Daily Comment (March 23, 2020)

by Bill O’Grady, Thomas Wash, and Patrick Fearon-Hernandez, CFA

[Posted: 9:30 AM EST]

It’s Monday.  Global markets remain in risk-off mode after the Senate’s first swing at the third phase of the rescue package failsBREAKING: FED GIVEN BROADER POWERS TO INTERVENE IN FINANCIAL MARKETS—MORE BELOW—S&P FUTURES RECOVER.  We update the COVID-19 virus news. Here are the details:

COVID-19:  The world now has 349,211 reported cases of COVID-19, with 15,308 fatalities and 100,165 recoveries.  Here is another link to a new site we have found on tracking the virus, along with a chart of infections from the FT:

The U.S. pace of infections is rising rapidly; this is probably more about increased testing. Sadly, there is no evidence of the bend we usually see when a country is getting on top of the spread.

The virus news:

The policy news:

The economic news:

Odds and ends:  The Marines are retooling their planning, preparing for war in the Asia-Pacific and reducing training for the Middle East.  Saudi Arabia intends to maintain the oil share war through borrowing.

View the complete PDF

Asset Allocation Weekly (March 20, 2020)

by Asset Allocation Committee

During the recent market tumult, gold has performed rather well, until lately.

(Source: Barchart.com)

This chart shows the nearest gold futures contract over the past year.  From mid-January, when reports of COVID-19 began to circulate, gold prices marched steadily higher, making an intraday high of $1,704.30.  Since then, this has declined by over $250 per ounce.  This drop is occurring despite a series of measures designed that would normally support gold prices, e.g., the return of zero fed funds, new quantitative easing, plans for massive fiscal spending, etc.

This is a chart of our gold model.  Fair value has increased to $1,529 per ounce and prices have dropped below that level.  We suspect the recent weakness is related to a rapid tightening of financial conditions.

This chart shows the Bloomberg Financial Conditions Index. A negative reading suggests higher levels of financial stress.  When financial stress rises to high levels, investors often are scrambling for cash, selling what they can and not necessarily what they should.  In other words, the investors may be selling gold to raise funds because it is a liquid asset.

Returning to the gold model chart, we highlighted the area in yellow that represents the 2008 Great Financial Crisis.  In the worst of that situation, gold also underperformed fair value.  However, once the liquidating stopped, gold began a multi-year bull market.  Although we are not necessarily expecting a similar move in prices, we do expect the aggressive expansion of liquidity via fiscal and monetary policy to create favorable conditions for gold in the coming years.

View the PDF

Daily Comment (March 20, 2020)

by Bill O’Grady, Thomas Wash, and Patrick Fearon-Hernandez, CFA

[Posted: 9:30 AM EST]

Good morning and happy Friday!  “There are decades where nothing happens, and there are weeks where decades happen.”  This quote, misappropriated to Lenin, seems to capture much of how things feel right now.  It’s a “green screen day” with equity futures rebounding around the world and the dollar finally taking a pause from its recent strength.  We update COVID-19 news, including comments about global stimulus activities.  Here are the details:

COVID-19:  The world now has 246,275 reported cases of COVID-19, with 10,038 fatalities and 86,035 recoveries.  Here is a chart of infections from the FT:

The U.S. pace of infections is rising rapidly; this is probably more about increased testing.  Sadly, there is no evidence of the bend we usually see when a country is getting on top of the spread.

The virus news:

The policy news:

  • We have seen nations attempt to control the news flow about the virus. China is notable in this area.  The U.S. is engaging in some of this as well.  The White House is asking states to stop issuing early information on initial jobless claims.  We are watching this news with great interest.  As we have been working through the data, we are seeing other economists suggesting historic declines in Q2 GDP of over 10% and perhaps a 2.0 million jump in jobless claims.  If the government decides to stop the release of the data, we will all be “flying blind.”  In addition, it won’t work; organization theory suggests that if you stop the flow of real information, people simply make up their own.  Not only will it probably not be accurate, it will likely be worse.
  • The Senate leadership is putting together a fiscal package of at least $1.0 trillion. Already, there is speculation this level will fall short.  And, the chance of getting something done quickly is starting to fade.  As one would expect, there is already squabbling over the details.  The White House has suggested that companies that take aid must give the government equity.  There is strong opposition to that idea, suggesting conditions haven’t gotten bad enough yet.
  • One of the tensions in the Senate bill is where the benefits fall. The establishment (both left and right) tend to favor support for businesses first, on the idea that if businesses fail, the job losses will be even worse.  Populists counter that businesses have squandered support after 2008 and recent tax cuts by merely repurchasing stock to aid the capital-owning establishment.  As we noted yesterday, we would use the same tactic we employ when confronting a dessert table—try everything!  However, we do note a set of reports that will give the establishment a black eye: a couple of senators, briefed on COVID-19 in February, dumped their equity holdings.  These reports will tend to undermine the establishment’s case; look for aid to be tied to equity.
  • Meanwhile, Germany and the U.K. have set up fiscal expansions.
  • The central banks continue to expand their activities. The BOE has cut rates to record lows and is increasing QE.  The Fed is moving aggressively as well, buying $250 billion of the $500 billion of new QE this week.  This almost certainly looks like more will be coming.  The ECB has also indicated it will consider boosting its balance sheet
  • Oil prices rallied on a few reports. First, President Trump suggested he may intervene in the conflict between Russia and the KSA.  There is some precedent for this action.  VP Bush reportedly did the same during the 1986 oil price collapse.  However, we note his intervention came after oil prices neared $10 per barrel and the parties were already in talks to end the overproduction war.  Second, as already announced, the U.S. will increase buying for the Strategic Petroleum Reserve.  Third, Texas is apparently considering dusting off its old production allocation mechanism used from the 1930s into 1970 which regulated the amount of oil that the state would produce.  Meanwhile, U.S. production remains at record levels.  As we noted in this week’s Weekly Energy Update, due to hedging, production will likely remain near record levels for the rest of the year without intervention.  What is unclear—if the Texas Railroad Commission restricts output, how will that affect debt servicing by oil companies?
  • The PBOC surprised us by not cutting rates overnight. China’s stimulus thus far has been modest.

The economic news:

Expect continued market swings.  Policymakers are moving in the right direction but the economic impact of battling the virus has been significant.  Enjoy the weekend.  We will talk to you on Monday.

View the complete PDF

Daily Comment (March 19, 2020)

by Bill O’Grady, Thomas Wash, and Patrick Fearon-Hernandez, CFA

[Posted: 9:30 AM EST]

Today is the spring equinox; it’s hard to say if this is a good or bad omen.  We update COVID-19 news.  Although there is much to say about the financial markets, to some extent, it can be summed up succinctly—there is a dash for cashEquities are falling again this morning.  Congress is working on a $1.0 trillion stimulus bill.  Don’t be surprised in a few weeks when we will marvel at how timid this action was.  We are paying close attention to today’s initial claims data as it is expected to show a massive increase in layoffs.  The weekly energy report is updated on our website.  Here are the details:

COVID-19: The world now has 222,643 reported cases of COVID-19 with 9,115 fatalities and 84,506 recoveries.  Here is a chart of infections from the FT:

The U.S. pace of infections is rising rapidly; this is probably more about increased testing.

The virus news:

And now, financial market news related to COVID-19:

Odds and ends: The journalism spat between the U.S. and China continues, with Beijing expelling some U.S. reporters.  The trade war continues as the U.S. increases tariffs on European aircraft.

View the complete PDF

Weekly Energy Update (March 19, 2020)

by Bill O’Grady, Thomas Wash, and Patrick Fearon-Hernandez, CFA

Crude oil inventories rose 2.0 mb compared to the forecast rise of 3.5 mb.

In the details, U.S. crude oil production rose 0.1 mbpd to 13.1 mbpd.  Exports rose 1.0 mbpd, while imports rose 0.1 mbpd.  The inventory build was less than forecast due to the rise in exports.

(Sources: DOE, CIM)

The above chart shows the annual seasonal pattern for crude oil inventories.  This week’s report put inventory accumulation modestly above seasonal norms.  Inventories will be expected to rise steady into late May.  We will be watching this chart closely in the coming weeks for signs that inventories are rising abnormally due to the market share war described below.

Based on our oil inventory/price model, fair value is $55.77; using the euro/price model, fair value is $53.14.  The combined model, a broader analysis of the oil price, generates a fair value of $53.26.  As we noted last week, the model output is less relevant unless Russia and the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia (KSA) come to an agreement on supply.

Needless to say, our forecast for oil prices was reasonably accurate in terms of level but far too conservative in terms of time.  WTI has declined under $21 per barrel since our last report.  The combination of increased KSA supply and rising Russian output, combined with falling demand, is putting significant negative pressure on prices.  U.S. oil producers in the shale patch are already signaling layoffs.  The U.S. industry is more competitive and better hedged than in 2015; although bankruptcies are unavoidable, production will likely remain elevated for some time regardless of how low prices fall.

This chart shows WTI oil prices with U.S. crude oil production.[1]  We have highlighted the area from the peak in oil prices in 2014 to the peak in production in 2015.  The lag between these two periods was 10 months.  Thus, we would not expect any significant declines in U.S. output until late Q4 at the earliest.  If Russia and the KSA continue to fight for market share, oil prices will remain under further pressure for the foreseeable future.

View the PDF


[1] The official DOE data has a two- to three-month lag.  The production data reported in the weekly data is an estimate from the DOE.

Daily Comment (March 18, 2020)

by Bill O’Grady, Thomas Wash, and Patrick Fearon-Hernandez, CFA

[Posted: 9:30 AM EST]

Well, it’s Wednesday, and we face another day right out of a post-apocalyptic zombie movie.  While there is still no sign of zombie armies marching on Washington, there is a more worrying sign that global financial markets are seizing up in a desperate scramble for liquidity.  Policymakers around the world are pledging in unison to do “whatever it takes” to rescue the global economy, which is a good thing, but markets will remain volatile until real results are visible.  Below we review all the key news from the crisis and beyond.

COVID-19:  Official data show confirmed cases have risen to 203,529 worldwide, with 8,205 deaths and 82,107 recoveries.  In the United States, confirmed cases rose to 6,496, with 114 deaths and 17 recoveries.  Most disconcerting, the slowdown in the real economy is exposing or exacerbating financial weaknesses.  There are increasing worries about businesses and individuals not only having trouble paying their everyday bills, but also covering the high levels of debt they took on during the boom of the last decade.

United States:  In yesterday’s Democratic Party primary elections, former Vice President Biden won all three key races.  With his wins in Florida, Illinois and Arizona, it appears he would only have to win 42.8% of the remaining delegates to the party’s summer convention in order to win outright in the first ballot.  The wins heap even more pressure on Vermont Sen. Bernie Sanders to drop out of the race.

Argentina:  President Alberto Fernández has proposed a further hike in the country’s soybean export tax to 33%, just months after he increased the tax to 30% from the previous 25%.  However, the powerful farmers’ lobby is now starting to push back by launching protests.  Along with the global coronavirus panic, the tension is negative for Argentine stocks and bonds.

View the complete PDF

Daily Comment (March 17, 2020)

by Bill O’Grady, Thomas Wash, and Patrick Fearon-Hernandez, CFA

[Posted: 9:30 AM EST]

Happy St. Patrick’s Day!  To celebrate the holiday, we think it would be great if the markets could end the day “in the green.”  However, much will depend on news flow related to the COVID-19 “black swan.”  With so many fast-moving developments, equities could easily turn back into the red.  On that colorful note, we review the latest news on the epidemic and a few odds and ends related to the oil market, Russia and Israel.

COVID-19:  Official data show confirmed cases have risen to 185,067 worldwide, with 7,330 deaths and 80,236 recoveries.  In the United States, confirmed cases rose to 4,661, with 85 deaths and 17 recoveries.

Oil market:  The International Energy Agency has warned that the Saudi-Russian price war and the COVID-19 epidemic will cut the revenues of “vulnerable” producing countries like Iraq and Nigeria by up to 85%.  The warning highlights how the combined crises could spark significant fiscal stress for many less developed countries.

Russia:  The highest Russian court approved President Putin’s constitutional changes, which were passed by parliament last week.  The court’s approval removes one of the final barriers to Putin potentially staying in power until 2036.

Israel:  President Rivlin has given former military chief Gantz the first crack at forming a government after this month’s inconclusive election.  However, Prime Minister Netanyahu is appealing to legislators in Gantz’s coalition to join with him to form a broad coalition in which Gantz and Netanyahu share power.

View the complete PDF

Weekly Geopolitical Report – Renewed Fighting in Idlib (March 16, 2020)

by Patrick Fearon-Hernandez, CFA

When financial markets get caught up in a crisis like the ongoing coronavirus panic, one underappreciated risk for investors is that they can get too distracted to notice other, longer-term problems that might be brewing.  That’s why we take such a disciplined approach to monitoring geopolitical, economic, social and market events all around the world.  While we continue working hard to understand the coronavirus epidemic and anticipate its trajectory, we’re also paying close attention to the latest flare up in the Syrian civil war.

In this week’s report, we discuss the Syrian government’s effort to finish off the last remaining rebels in the northwest part of the country, and we show why Turkey recently launched a counteroffensive against that effort.  We explain what the various players in the drama are hoping to achieve and how their actions could draw in outside forces like Russia and the U.S.  Importantly, we also discuss how the situation could produce another destabilizing migrant crisis for the Europeans.  As always, we conclude with investment implications.

View the full report

Keller Quarterly (March 16, 2020)

Letter to Investors

The last three weeks of financial market turbulence have been among the most harrowing I’ve ever seen.  To my memory it’s been a combination of October 1987 and October 2008, two months I’d prefer to forget.  While the stock market was dropping sharply and quickly, U.S. Treasury bonds were soaring almost as fast.[1]  In my last two quarterly letters I’ve noted the impossibility of seeing into the future.  I think we’ve now established beyond a reasonable doubt that neither we nor anyone else can forecast future events.  Within a surprisingly short period of time, the U.S. economy (and the global economy) has moved from a period of steady growth and low unemployment to a position of great vulnerability.  How did this happen?  Three things have quickly conspired to bring us to this point.  The first two were both new and invisible until quite recently.  The third was a known concern lurking out of sight (but always there in a long economic expansion).  These three causes of our troubles are:

  1. The coronavirus known as SARS-CoV-2, which produces a serious and sometimes fatal disease known as COVID-19, has spread around the world. This virus began in China in December 2019 and began moving across that country in the first two months of this year.  From there the virus moved east and west across the world (as almost all viruses do).  This virus has proven to be particularly dangerous because it is virtually as contagious as the common cold but has a mortality factor somewhat worse than seasonal influenza.  Our chief market strategist, Bill O’Grady, and his team have been tracking the path of this virus since January.  As it has neared the U.S. it has become apparent that it will cause an economic slowdown here, since the most effective way to combat this virus is social isolation, which translates to much lower economic activity.  Because the virus seems to have an arc of virulence roughly two to three months in length, it has been our view that the virus alone was not enough to cause a recession here or cause lasting economic damage.  Over the last week, that view has changed due to the second causal factor.
  2. An oil price war has broken out between OPEC, led by the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia (KSA), and the Russian government. Both governments are oil-dependent and thus benefit from higher (but not too high) oil prices.  This mutual goal has been frustrated in the last decade by increasing oil supplies from outside of OPEC and Russia, mostly from the United States.  In a meeting that concluded on March 7, the KSA tried to convince Russia to agree to a set of production cuts that would keep prices high.  Russia declined to reduce oil production and instead announced its intention to increase production to drive prices down.  The KSA has since also announced production increases.  These two petrostates appear to be intent on driving prices down in order to: a) maintain and grow market share in China, the world’s #1 importer, and b) reduce U.S. shale producers’ share of world markets by moving oil prices below their costs of production. Once relieved of the U.S.’s large oil production, they hope that prices will rise more permanently.  This is a high-stakes game, where the loser is the U.S. oil industry.  If the U.S. government cannot force the end of this price war quickly, the probability of a recession in the U.S. rises substantially when combined with the virus-related slowdown.  It so happens that right now the U.S. is vulnerable to a recession for a very ordinary reason, our third factor.
  3. Private sector debt always grows as an economic expansion ages. The reason for this is that investors and businesspeople become more bold as an expansion gets old.  The further a recession recedes into the rear-view mirror, the more people believe it won’t happen again.  Thus, they become bolder in their investments.  We are fortunate that, unlike 2008, the debt growth this time is not concentrated in the consumer sector like it was then.  Twelve years ago, residential mortgage debt was the big problem.  This time the debt problem is corporate debt.  This has been something we’ve been monitoring for a while.  Both our Market Strategy team and our Asset Allocation team have noted a heightened probability of economic difficulties in their recent publications.[2]  Much of this debt, especially that below-investment grade, is tied to the energy industry.  Thus, the price war in oil has increased the probability of financial troubles in the oil patch and on Wall Street.  Much of this debt is outside of the U.S. banking system.  Post-2008 reforms required U.S. banks to hold higher levels of equity capital and reserves, reducing their ability to lend.  The demand for debt capital grew, however, as both the economy and the energy industry grew.  Non-bank lenders grew dramatically over this decade to meet the demand for money, with the result that financial risk also grew.  The “staying power” of energy companies through this likely oil price “valley” is thus reduced by their debt loads, and the lenders who serve them could become impaired as well.

In my opinion, any one of these factors would have been unlikely to produce a recession.  For instance, factor #2 did occur just five years ago, when oil prices declined from near $100 per barrel to about $30 over 15 months.  While the oil industry suffered its own recession, the U.S. avoided a general recession.  The coincidence of all three of these factors within the same short time frame raises substantially and quickly the probability of a recession.

Bill O’Grady publishes every Friday an Asset Allocation Weekly report that is appended to the end of the Confluence Daily Comment.  This past Friday Bill published one of the most important pieces he’s ever written.[3]  In this report Bill explained why, within the space of a week, the probability of a recession this year has risen from low to high.  In a lengthier 2020 Outlook Update published today we explain how the three factors noted above have changed our base case for the year to one of recession.[4]  The sharp sell-off in the stock market and the rise in the treasury bond market were not simply due to panic about the coronavirus.  We presume that we were not alone in ratcheting up dramatically our expectation of a recession last week.  The result is that the U.S. stock market, basis the S&P 500, has dropped 27.0% from its top-tick on February 19 to its bottom tick on March 12.  It presently stands at 2711, or 20.1% below its high.  Bill’s work (in the AAW report noted) indicates a likely low of about 2300, which is 15.2% below our current level.  This estimate presumes a recession of normal length and depth, which is our current expectation.  Given that estimate, the market would appear to have, in a period of about three weeks, sold off roughly two-thirds of what we would have expected for the entire cyclical bear market.  This is consistent with market behavior over the last few decades, wherein market discounting for rapid changes in expectations has become an extremely quick affair.

What is Confluence doing?  Confluence provides both equity strategies (utilizing individual stocks) and asset allocation strategies (utilizing exchange-traded funds, or ETFs).  Our equity strategies are fully invested strategies with low turnover, which we believe provide long-term investors (those with a greater than five-year time horizon) the best opportunity to build wealth.  We do not asset allocate within an equity portfolio, which means we do not target cash to “time the market.”  We don’t do that because we deem it impossible to do so successfully and consistently.  This means that our equity portfolios do usually decline in price when the general market heads south.  Our goal is not to sit out bear markets, but to survive them by owning shares in companies that not only survive recessions but come out of them with stronger competitive positions.  For long-term taxable investors, this strategy is especially valuable, in our opinion.

While we always emphasize company quality according to specific and proprietary guidelines, as the probability of a recession rises, we test each position again regarding its survivability in the sort of recession we anticipate.  Any companies that concern us are removed and replaced, even if bought in recent months.  In other cases, shares of outstanding businesses we do not own because of prohibitively high valuations become available to us at what we consider to be bargain prices.  Thus, again, we will sell shares of companies we consider to be lesser businesses and replace them with what we believe is a quality upgrade.  Investors are sometimes troubled when we sell a stock in a down market, even at a loss, but when we do so we have the eventual economic recovery in mind.  The goal is to put the portfolio in an optimal position to benefit from that recovery.  As a wise old investor once said, “The goal in a falling market is to own tennis balls rather than tomatoes.”  Economies and stock markets do recover.  We aim to both give up as little as possible on the downside and to pick up as much as possible on the upside.

Confluence’s asset allocation strategies take a medium-term view of investing, that is, a three-year forward time frame.  In an era when changes in market prices occur quickly and severely as economic outlooks change, asset allocation is an investor’s best tool to protect oneself.  This is a preventative, rather than tactical, maneuver, but it’s by far the most effective.  An investor should set a balance between asset classes that fits his or her risk profile when markets are tranquil.  After markets have adjusted dramatically, such as at present, it makes sense to reevaluate the asset allocation.  If an investor’s risk profile is unchanged, it makes sense for most investors to rebalance the asset allocation.

For clients in our asset allocation and balanced strategies, an investor, with the counsel of their financial advisor, can select the appropriate asset allocation at the outset.  If personal circumstances change, the asset allocation can be changed by giving us instructions.  Otherwise, we manage the asset allocation according to our investment team’s outlook.  When markets move dramatically, the rebalancing occurs automatically in our asset allocation and balanced portfolios.

Given an increasingly dour outlook in recent quarters, we increased the relative duration and investment quality of our fixed income allocations and have increased our allocations to gold in those strategies for which commodity allocations are appropriate.  These allocations have cushioned some, but not all, of the downside in the equity allocations.  At some point in the economic cycle, we expect to reverse some of those moves.  Until that time, rebalancing asset allocations will still occur.

Regardless of the strategy, our investment teams are attentive to the rapid changes that have occurred and are occurring.  As noted above, we cannot forecast the future, but new and, sometimes, unexpected changes are par for the course.  When dramatically new challenges occur, we react accordingly, if necessary.  We encourage you to stay in touch with the changing investment landscape by reading our Daily Comment and other publications on our website.

We appreciate your confidence in us.

 

Gratefully,

Mark A. Keller, CFA
CEO and Chief Investment Officer

View the PDF


[1] This is a reminder, by the way, of the value of utilizing both stocks and bonds in a portfolio.

[2] 2020 Outlook: Storm Watch (12/19/2019); Asset Allocation Quarterly (Q1 2020)

[3] Asset Allocation Weekly (3/13/2020)

[4] 2020 Outlook Update: Storm Warning (3/16/2020)