Weekly Geopolitical Report – Renewed Fighting in Idlib (March 16, 2020)

by Patrick Fearon-Hernandez, CFA

When financial markets get caught up in a crisis like the ongoing coronavirus panic, one underappreciated risk for investors is that they can get too distracted to notice other, longer-term problems that might be brewing.  That’s why we take such a disciplined approach to monitoring geopolitical, economic, social and market events all around the world.  While we continue working hard to understand the coronavirus epidemic and anticipate its trajectory, we’re also paying close attention to the latest flare up in the Syrian civil war.

In this week’s report, we discuss the Syrian government’s effort to finish off the last remaining rebels in the northwest part of the country, and we show why Turkey recently launched a counteroffensive against that effort.  We explain what the various players in the drama are hoping to achieve and how their actions could draw in outside forces like Russia and the U.S.  Importantly, we also discuss how the situation could produce another destabilizing migrant crisis for the Europeans.  As always, we conclude with investment implications.

View the full report

Weekly Geopolitical Report – What’s Putin up to? (August 29, 2016)

by Bill O’Grady

Over the past few months, Russian President Vladimir Putin has been unusually active on multiple fronts.  He has expanded his military operations in the Middle East in support of Syrian President Assad, boosted troop strength on the Ukrainian border and conducted a major purge and restructuring of the Russian government.  He has also accused Ukraine of terrorist activity in Crimea, which he seized in 2014.

In this report, we will offer a short recap of Putin’s recent activities.  To create context for these moves, we will discuss how these actions fit into Putin’s hold on power.  As always, we will conclude with potential market ramifications.

View the full report

Weekly Geopolitical Report – Syria and the Red Line (May 6, 2013)

by Bill O’Grady

On Thursday, April 25, Secretary of Defense Hagel acknowledged that evidence that chemical weapons exposure occurred in Syria was probably accurate.  This news dominated the Sunday talk shows, mostly because President Obama had indicated that Syrian military use of chemical weapons would be a “game changer” and a “red line” that would trigger a U.S. and international response.  Now that it appears that somehow chemical weapons exposure did occur, the world awaits to see what exactly the president meant by a “response.”

In this report, we will discuss the problem President Obama has created, why he likely declared the “red line,” and his reluctance to intervene.  This reluctance is varied and complicated—essentially, it is difficult to see how there are any good options for the U.S. in intervening in the Syrian Civil War.  At the same time, not taking some sort of action will undermine his and America’s credibility which will be closely watched by North Korea, Iran, Russia and China, as well as by America’s allies.  As always, we will examine the ramifications of this event on the financial and commodity markets.

View the full report