Daily Comment (March 31, 2020)

by Bill O’Grady, Thomas Wash, and Patrick Fearon-Hernandez, CFA

[Posted: 9:30 AM EDT]

As March draws to a close today, we’re reminded of the old adage about the month: in like a lion, out like a lamb.  After what we’ve all gone through during the last month, we certainly hope for a day that’s as quiet and gentle as a lamb!  As always, we review all the key news on the coronavirus epidemic and related, market-relevant items.

COVID-19:  Official data show confirmed cases have risen to 801,400 worldwide, with 38,743 deaths and 172,657 recoveries.  In the United States, confirmed cases rose to 164,610, with 3,170 deaths and 5,945 recoveries (though the recovery data is lagging).  Here is the latest chart of infections from the Financial Times:

Global Oil Market:  Two major shale producers in the Permian Basin have asked Texas regulators to consider curtailing crude output in the state as the industry grapples with collapsing demand and plunging prices.  Meanwhile, poorer oil producers such as Iraq and Venezuela are being forced to consider steep budget cuts as low oil prices cut deeply into their revenues.

View the complete PDF

Weekly Geopolitical Report – Could the Coronavirus Pandemic Break Up the EU? – Part I (March 30, 2020)

by Patrick Fearon-Hernandez, CFA

In times of crisis, the future is a luxury.  Or, at least, thinking about the future can seem like a luxury, especially if you’re reeling from the death of a loved one, the loss of a job, the devastation of a retirement portfolio, or just the boredom and isolation of a quarantine.  Many people are overwhelmed with those challenges in the midst of the COVID-19 pandemic.  And yet the pandemic is changing the future course of the world in ways that we’ll all need to understand and respond to eventually.  Those future changes extend to politics and geopolitical relations.

In this report, we explore the recent signs suggesting the COVID-19 pandemic could potentially lead to a break-up of the European Union (EU).  In Part I, we examine the history of the EU, how it works, and the political and social fissures that undermine its stability.  In Part II next week, we will look at the recent policy moves by various EU countries that could lead to disintegration if carried too far.  We’ll wrap up with a discussion of the possible economic consequences of a break-up and the ramifications for investors.

View the full report

Daily Comment (March 30, 2020)

by Bill O’Grady, Thomas Wash, and Patrick Fearon-Hernandez, CFA

[Posted: 9:30 AM EDT]

Good morning and happy Monday!  Before we begin, we want to note a correction from our Friday comment; we erroneously reported the NHL had cancelled its season.[1]  That wasn’t true, and we apologize for any confusion.  Global equities are lower and oil prices are testing $20 per barrel.  However, U.S. equity futures are ticking higher.  We update all the COVID-19 news, including some charts on what is happening in the economy.  Here are the details:

COVID-19:  The official number of global cases is 735,560 with 34,830 fatalities and 156,380 recoveries.  There is growing skepticism over China’s numbers; this is especially pertinent given media reports that the U.S. now has more cases than China.  Here is the usual FT chart:

There is a recognizable “bend” developing in the U.S. infection rate.  That is potentially good news.

The virus news:

The policy news:

  • Congress and the White House are already preparing for “Phase 4” of the stimulus program. The general consensus is that the preceding measures will merely offer support to those affected by COVID-19 and act as a stopgap.  Restarting growth will be another matter.
  • Congress is “rearming” the Fed, boosting its ability to begin lending directly to businesses and local governments. These new powers are significant; one of the problems that hampered the response in 2008 was that the Fed pushed liquidity into the banking system, where it sat idle.  That led to calls among left-wing politicians for direct central bank support; in Britain, Jeremy Corbyn called for “QE for people.”  These new powers are a step in that direction—the Fed would be simply bypassing the financial system and putting money directly into the economy, à la MMT.  This development comes in the face of a severe testing of the U.S. social safety net.
  • The U.S. plans to suspend tariff collection for three months.
  • The next battle brewing could be in insurance. The industry is claiming that policies it has written specifically exclude pandemics; governments beg to differ.
  • Across the pond, there are a couple items of note. First, Italy’s widespread “off the books” labor market means that millions of workers will be excluded from government support measures.  And, there is a deep battle brewing in the Eurozone; a growing roster of nations, mostly in the south, are pressing for a Eurobond, a bond backed by the full faith and credit of the entire (read: Germany) Eurozone.  Needless to say, Germany and the Netherlands are opposed to such measures.  As we are reporting over the next two weeks in the WGR, the fracturing of the EU is becoming a geopolitical concern.

The economic news:

The market news:

  • Banks and other lenders are tightening lending standards as borrowing demand rises. Historically, lenders are pro-cyclical; they tend to increase lending in good times and withdraw it in bad times.  Unfortunately, this sort of behavior makes the recession worse.  Hence the entry of the Fed into direct lending.
  • There are three charts we want to note this morning. First, there has been a flight-to-government money market funds (IMMK) and away from prime funds.  During the 2008 Financial Crisis there was similar activity.  The second chart updates the retail MMK and S&P 500, while the third chart shows how foreign central banks are drawing the Fed’s swap lines.

In 2016, SEC regulations changed and allowed the NAV on MMK to deviate from $1.00 per share.  This change prompted a flight into government funds.  However, we did see a modest recovery in prime MMK until recently.  As financial stress has increased, so has the exodus from prime MMK.

Second, readers will be familiar with our retail MMK/S&P 500 chart, which is updated below.

When the trade war expanded in early 2018, retail investors began building cash positions.  This positioning accelerated despite the rally in stocks from Q2 2018 into February of this year.  But, as stocks have declined, MMK has risen sharply.

Third, the Fed’s forex swap lines are being drawn aggressively.

These swap lines are used by foreign central banks to provide dollars to their borrowers who have dollar-denominated debt.  As financial stress has increased, we have seen the dollar rally.  In 2008, the dollar weakened only after the draw on foreign currency swaps declined.

  • Oil prices continue to spiral lower. A couple news items of note.  First, the recently passed stimulus bill failed to include funding to purchase oil for the SPR.  Second, gasoline crack spreads, which is a rough measure of refining margins, have dipped under zero recently.  The chart below shows that a barrel of gasoline is trading below the cost of a barrel of oil.  If this continues much longer, we will likely see refining activity decline which will put additional pressure on prices.
(Source: Bloomberg)

Foreign policy news:

View the complete PDF


[1] One of the dangers of working from home is overhearing members of the household making unsubstantiated claims.  Going forward, we will rely on Ronald Reagan’s dictum of “trust but verify.”

2020 Outlook Update #2: Storm Warning (March 27, 2020)

by Bill O’Grady & Mark Keller | PDF

We have been updating our 2020 Outlook to keep you informed of our thoughts as conditions evolve. We have refreshed some of the charts from our update last week and added new comments, included below in bold.

Update #2: March 27, 2020 | Update #1: March 16, 2020

Summary—High Probability of Recession:

  1. The economy is facing three simultaneous problems:
    1. A public health crisis—COVID-19 and the economic impact of containing it;
    2. An oil price war and a regional economic slump;
    3. Rapidly rising financial stress caused by (a) and (b) along with underlying unresolved issues.
  2. Although we are weeks away from data confirming that we are in a recession, the qualitative evidence leads us to say that a recession is a near certainty.
    1. We are now working from the standpoint that a recession is underway.
  3. The content of this report:
    1. An overview of how recessions look compared to expansions;
    2. A discussion of the three threats the expansion faces;
    3. The market impact of these three threats.

Read the full report

Asset Allocation Weekly (March 27, 2020)

by Asset Allocation Committee

We continue to monitor the path of the economy and markets as our expectations for a recession loom.  This week we will update our S&P 500 earnings forecast for 2020.

We use two components to build our forecast for S&P per share earnings.  First, we need to estimate GDP.  Normally, we use the GDP forecast from the Philadelphia FRB’s survey of economists.  However, under current circumstances, these forecasts are woefully out of date, so we are left to our own devices.  Any GDP forecast at present is mostly a guess; there isn’t enough data for March to project any sort of forecast for Q2.  Nevertheless, some estimate of GDP is necessary; our expectation for real GDP is a decline of 5.5% for the year 2020 with a strong rebound in 2021.  This will make the 2020 recession one of the deepest on record and the deepest yearly recession since 1946.  But, it will be short; our estimate suggests that Q2 and Q3 will be negative, with a positive Q4.

We take this forecast and calculate a nominal GDP number.  Second, we use a model to generate the S&P operating earnings margin relative to GDP.  It uses a series of variables, including unit labor costs, fed funds, NIPA profits/GDP, the euro, WTI, real net exports/GDP and corporate cash flow.  The one variable that has been of particular concern is the comparison of S&P 500 earnings/GDP compared to NIPA profits[1]/GDP; the modeled difference between these two variables has widened and, in the past, has signaled an eventual reversion would bring S&P earnings sharply lower.

The deviation line shows that when S&P earnings/GDP is elevated relative to NIPA profits/GDP, the two tend to correct during recessions.  Current levels are elevated; in a recession, history shows the two series tend to converge.

In our 2020 Outlook Update, we postulated that a recession would occur.  Our margin model shows that S&P earnings will fall to 4.5% of nominal GDP.  That lowers our estimate for 2020 S&P operating earnings to 127.00 per share.

Whenever we make a forecast, we try to determine where the most likely area of error can occur.  We note that in the last recession, the model forecast failed to capture the depths of the earnings decline.  And, in 2016, it didn’t fully account for the energy-related declines.  Thus, we may be underestimating the degree of earnings weakness that may occur.  But, for now, we will be using the 127.00 per share number for 2020, with the caveat that further downgrades are possible.

View the PDF


[1] NIPA stands for “National Income and Product Accounts” and is the formal name of the GDP accounts.  As part of that accounting, the Commerce Department calculates corporate profits for the entire economy.

Daily Comment (March 27, 2020)

by Bill O’Grady, Thomas Wash, and Patrick Fearon-Hernandez, CFA

[Posted: 9:30 AM EST]

Happy Friday as we wrap up another long week.  After three days of vigorous equity rallies, we are taking a breather this morning.  We update all the COVID-19 news.  Venezuela’s president is indicted.  Israel has a new unity government.  Here are the details:

COVID-19:  The official number of global cases is 542,788 with 24,361 fatalities and 124,351 recoveries.  There is growing skepticism over China’s numbers; this is especially pertinent given media reports that the U.S. now has more cases than China.  Here is the usual FT chart:

There is a recognizable “bend” developing in the U.S. infection rate.  That is potentially good news.

The virus news:

  • Boris Johnson has tested positive for the virus, the first G-7 leader to do so. So far, his symptoms have been mild, and he is continuing to work in isolation.
  • There is a growing debate among epidemiologist modelers about how COVID-19 is spreading. The conventional position is that the virus is potentially dangerous because it is novel and there is no imbedded immunity in the community.  This position prescribes widespread social distancing.  However, other modelers suggest there is a significant number of cases that were asymptomatic so the level of immunity in the community may be much higher than we think.  If the latter is true, then the need for social distancing is less critical.  What we see is that the disease is overwhelming the medical capacity in several cities worldwide.  This observation bolsters the conventional position.  However, the opposing position may be the one that leads us out.  Sweden has opted for very modest restrictions; it is gambling that (a) most cases are mild and thus the costs of infection are bearable, and (b) its medical system can handle the influx of cases if it is wrong.  Sweden, Mexico and Brazil are offering natural experiments on the policies of lockdowns and social distancing.
  • As we noted yesterday, Russia is postponing a referendum on extending Putin’s time in office. It also announced social distancing measures and is going to tax bank deposits to pay for them.
  • Earlier this week, the U.S. Navy announced that 23 sailors aboard the U.S.S. Theodore Roosevelt tested positive for COVID-19. This vessel has been ordered to port so the remaining sailors can be tested.
  • China has closed its borders to foreign travelers in an attempt to prevent a rebound in cases.

The policy news:

  • The House is expected to vote on the stimulus bill, which passed the Senate yesterday. Although we expect it to pass, it will not be without drama.  The leadership is trying to ensure it can get enough members back in Washington to form a quorum.  House leadership was hoping to pass the measure with a voice vote, but it only takes one member to object which would force a physical vote; hence the rush to Washington.
  • In the bill, airlines will give equity stakes to the government in return for support. Cruise lines, due to foreign ownership, won’t get aid.
  • Although getting this bill passed is a significant achievement, the reality is that it only partially replaces the losses already endured. Further measures are likely, but getting them passed will become increasingly difficult.
  • The ECB has started new bond purchases. We are already seeing yield spreads narrow between countries.

The economic news:

  • The jump in initial claims, reported yesterday, was historic. And, it is quite possible that the claims data was understated.  We modeled the unemployment rate using the four-week average of claims and continuing claims.  We will likely see a massive rise in unemployment.

The March employment data will be very sensitive to the survey week, which is usually the second week of the month.  We may not get the full impact of the virus until the April data is released, which comes out in early May.

  • Although we continue to lack data on the level of damage to the economy, there are high-frequency reports from new sources that suggest serious weakness. Here is one on consumer confidencePolling suggests widespread pain.
  • With reference to our recent WGR, the Swiss have been managing their shutdown with relative ease because of government strategic stockpiles of foodstuffs.
  • Companies are reporting a jump in sales of tops and shirts, but without the corresponding pants and skirts—perhaps a reflection of increased videoconferencing.

The market news:

Foreign policy:

Israel:  Although Netanyahu and Gantz vowed not to form a unity government, under the stress of the virus, they have worked out a deal.

Venezuela:  The U.S. has indicted Venezuelan President Maduro for narcotics trafficking and has offered a $15 million reward for information leading to his capture and conviction.

View the complete PDF

Business Cycle Report (March 26, 2020)

by Thomas Wash

The business cycle has a major impact on financial markets; recessions usually accompany bear markets in equities.  We have created this report to keep our readers apprised of the potential for recession, which we plan to update on a monthly basis.  Although it isn’t the final word on our views about recession, it is part of our process in signaling the potential for a downturn.

In February, the economic data was slightly weaker than the prior month but not enough to signal recession. The coronavirus spread from China into South Korea, which raised concerns of the impact the virus would have on the global economy. As a result, equities weakened and U.S. Treasuries rallied. That being said, manufacturing showed signs of a recovery as purchasing managers were optimistic that the trade deal signed in the previous month would finally lead to an improvement in orders. Additionally, the employment numbers were strong, suggesting that prior to March there was a lot of optimism about the economy. In this report, three out of the 11 indicators were in recession territory. The reading for February fell to +0.576 from +0.636.

The chart above shows the Confluence Diffusion Index. It uses a three-month moving average of 11 leading indicators to track the state of the business cycle. The red line signals when the business cycle is headed toward a contraction, while the blue line signals when the business cycle is headed toward a recovery. On average, the diffusion index is currently providing about six months of lead time for a contraction and five months of lead time for a recovery. Continue reading for a more in-depth understanding of how the indicators are performing and refer to our Glossary of Charts at the back of this report for a description of each chart and what it measures. A chart title listed in red indicates that indicator is signaling recession.

View the complete PDF

Daily Comment (March 26, 2020)

by Bill O’Grady, Thomas Wash, and Patrick Fearon-Hernandez, CFA

[Posted: 9:30 AM EST]

The long-awaited initial claims data is out; we offer details below, but claims rose a record 3.28 mm.  After a two-day respite, equities have turned lower.  As we note below, the Senate has passed a $2.0 trillion spending package.  As usual, we update the COVID-19 data.  The Weekly Energy Update is available.  Here are the details:

COVID-19:  The official number of global cases is 487,648 with 22,030 fatalities and 117,749 recoveries.  Although we report on this data each day, readers should note that these numbers are, at best, a mere snapshot.  The number of actual cases is probably far higher.  Here is the usual FT chart:

The virus news:

The policy news:

The economic news:

The market news:

  • Bonds have been a mixed bag. Investment grade is rebounding as the Fed measures improve liquidity.  However, high yield, which lacks similar support, remains strained.  Weekly flows data show a massive “bond dump.”  This chart shows the weekly flows into bond mutual funds and ETFs, showing the raw data with a 12-week moving average.  The chart speaks for itself.

Foreign policy:

Odds and ends:  Turkey has indicted 20 Saudis in connection with the murder of Jamal Khashoggi.  There is growing dissention within the right-wing populist AfD in Germany.

View the complete PDF

Weekly Energy Update (March 26, 2020)

by Bill O’Grady, Thomas Wash, and Patrick Fearon-Hernandez, CFA

Crude oil inventories rose 1.6 mb compared to the forecast rise of 3.0 mb.

In the details, U.S. crude oil production fell 0.1 mbpd to 13.0 mbpd.  Exports fell 0.5 mbpd, while imports declined 0.4 mbpd.  The inventory build was less than forecast due to a modest rise in refinery operations.

(Sources: DOE, CIM)

The above chart shows the annual seasonal pattern for crude oil inventories.  This week’s report maintained the recent pattern of putting accumulations modestly above seasonal norms.  Inventories will be expected to rise steady into late May.  We will be watching this chart closely in the coming weeks for signs that inventories are rising abnormally due to the market share war described below.

Based on our oil inventory/price model, fair value is $55.20; using the euro/price model, fair value is $50.09.  The combined model, a broader analysis of the oil price, generates a fair value of $50.96.  As we noted last week, the model output is less relevant unless Russia and the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia (KSA) come to an agreement on supply.

In the coming weeks, there are two key factors we will be monitoring.  The first is the recession’s impact on product demand.  So far, there is little evidence that demand is being affected.  We do expect that we will start to see consumption decline markedly in the near future.  Second, U.S. commercial crude oil storage is around 550 mb.  If commercial inventories rise to that level, price declines could become catastrophic because there will be nowhere for that oil to go.  We approached that level in 2017 but OPEC took action to prevent further declines in prices.  The government’s decision to add to the Strategic Petroleum Reserve will help in this area but we still worry that the lack of storage capacity could have a profoundly bearish effect on oil prices.

On the international front, the U.S. is pressing the KSA to end its price war.  We doubt Riyadh will change course, but we will monitor this development.

View the PDF