Daily Comment (April 14, 2020)

by Bill O’Grady, Thomas Wash, and Patrick Fearon-Hernandez, CFA

[Posted: 9:30 AM EDT]

Today’s uptick in the markets appears to stem in large part from chatter about COVID-19 lockdown restrictions being eased in the coming weeks.  Of course, other data shows that in some countries new virus cases and deaths are still rising strongly, so it’s still too early to call the “all clear.”  We review all the virus developments and other news below.

COVID-19:  Official data show confirmed cases have risen to 1,934,583 worldwide, with 120,863 deaths and 464,398 recoveries.  In the United States, confirmed cases rose to 582,594, with 23,649 deaths and 44,308 recoveries.  Here is the chart of infections now being published by the Financial Times:

Virology

Real Economy

U.S. Policy Response

Foreign Policy Response

Markets

Odds & Ends:  Top negotiators from the EU and the U.K. will hold a call tomorrow in an effort to restart negotiations on the U.K.’s post-Brexit relationship with the EU, after talks were curtailed by the virus crisis last month . . . North Korea has carried out what appears to be its fifth short-range missile test of the year . . . Israeli President Rivlin said he would give Benny Gantz and incumbent Prime Minister Netanyahu two more days to form a government, after they informed him they were struggling to agree on a new unity government but still making progress.

View the complete PDF

Daily Comment (April 13, 2020)

by Bill O’Grady, Thomas Wash, and Patrick Fearon-Hernandez, CFA

[Posted: 9:30 AM EDT]

Good morning!  Equities are modestly lower this morning; oil is steady.  We update the COVID-19 news.  OPEC+ has a deal.  Some comments on the Fed.  Here are the details:

COVID-19:  The official number of global cases is 1,860,011 with 114,983 fatalities and 438,516 recoveries.  Here is the FT chart:

For those looking for more intensive monitoring, here is the IHME site.  You can not only check out the U.S. data but also look at it by state.  The good news is that, according to these models, we are at the peak of fatalities now and should see slow improvement.  However, a caveat…the confidence bands are extremely wide.  The forecasts from these models are important but also carry a remarkable degree of uncertainty.

The virus news:

  • PM Johnson has left the hospital. He has not returned to work quite yet.
  • The virus has hit the Saudi royal family. The governor of Riyadh is said to be in intensive care and several dozen members have been infected as well.
  • Spain is starting to ease restrictions, while India is in the early stages of the pandemic. Nations around the world are in various phases of dealing with the virus.
  • Early on, COVID-19 was compared to the seasonal flu; we did that as well. As our experience has developed, important differences have emerged.  Those hospitalized with COVID-19 are there much longer and 10x more are hospitalized with it.  The fatality rate appears to be much higher.  There is also a mystery about why some people are not only asymptomatic but also virus “super-spreaders.”
  • New York is struggling with the grim task of burying the indigent dead.
  • Morgan Stanley (MS, $41.08) has generated a likely path for the recovery from COVID-19.
(Source: Morgan Stanley)

Their analysis, like our work, is an estimate, but it is a reasonable path of the disease.  By early summer, they estimate we will be seeing widescale testing, both for the virus and for immunity.  Workers will start returning by June with another wave by mid-summer, based on the idea that we will (a) have a much better idea of who has immunity, and (b) testing will allow for rapid isolation of those who catch it later.  Schools will reopen in the fall.  By Q4, we will be testing a potential vaccine; by late Q1 2021, a vaccine will become broadly available.  This schematic suggests that it will take about a year for conditions to return to normal but there will be steady improvement over time.  For those with sensitive conditions, returning to work may not occur for a year.  But, for those under 50 without complicating conditions, or with immunity, the sheltering-in-place orders will start to ease up.

The policy news:

  • The firestorm of Fed programs is making it hard to keep up; Fed independence is clearly at risk. But, one of the nice things about a three-day weekend is that it gives one time to reflect and analyze.  The Fed’s decision to expand support for state and local debt is potentially a game changer.  One of the key points to Federal debt is that it is issued in a currency that the debt issuer can print.  In other words, default can only occur by decision because money can always be provided to service the debt.  That doesn’t mean that the Federal government can’t get into trouble by expanding debt, but it isn’t the same trouble that an issuer lacking currency sovereignty can find itself.  In other words, inflation is the problem for debt issuers with currency sovereignty; default is the problem for debt issuers that lack currency sovereignty.
    • The lack of currency sovereignty is one of the key differences between Federal debt and state and local debt. The latter cannot print the currency in which it issues its debt and thus can default.
    • But, the Fed is now backstopping state and local debt which means, in reality, these issuers now have currency sovereignty. Or, put another way, by putting this debt on the Fed’s balance sheet, state and local governments can, in theory, run persistent deficits.
    • In the short run, what the Fed is doing is justifiable. One of the problems of the Great Financial Crisis was that state and local governments, facing a collapse in tax revenue, were forced to cut spending.  In fact, spending was cut enough to mostly offset what the Federal government was spending.

Note that by Q3 2010, the Federal government was adding about 122 bps to GDP; state and local governments were subtracting 168 bps.  The government does not want a situation where the stimulus is being offset by falling state and local spending.

The economic news:

The market news:

(Sources: Axios, IHS)

 

As we noted last week, history tends to show that the larger the cartel, the harder it is to avoid the free-rider problem.  The good news is that the arrangement likely prevents a sudden collapse.  However, it doesn’t mean that a bottom is in place either.  Meanwhile, we are starting to see well shut-ins; it is highly unlikely that many of these wells will ever restart in the absence of much higher prices.  Studies by regional Fed banks, including Dallas and Kansas City, warn of massive bankruptcies if prices remain below $30 per barrel.

  • Given the sharp recovery seen in equities, we have been getting questions about whether this pace of improvement will continue. History would suggest it won’t.

We have weekly data for the S&P 500 Friday closes going back to 1928.  We reviewed every recession (except 1945, which had very odd behavior) and indexed each market to the pre-recession high.  The red line shows the average of all recessions, along with the three highest correlating periods.  We overshot both the average and the other correlating years.  We have rallied back to the average, but note that the average and 1968/1980 cycles remained rather flat until after week 15.  We are currently on week eight.  If history is any guide, we will likely see equities churn for another couple of months, at best.  At worst, we will stay sideways for more than a year.  Each recession is different and this one we are now experiencing is clearly unusual.  However, it would be a bit of a stretch to expect that what we have seen recently will continue.

The foreign policy news:

View the complete PDF

Asset Allocation Weekly (April 9, 2020)

by Asset Allocation Committee

One of the more controversial issues of the past bull market was the impact of share buybacks.  The way we like to frame that issue is with the S&P 500 divisor.  The divisor is a number that is used to smooth out the index; when stocks leave the index, through replacement or mergers, or when new stock is issued or purchased, the divisor adjusts to prevent discrete jumps in the index.  Therefore, if companies are buying back stock, the divisor will decline, all else held equal.

This chart shows the divisor and the S&P 500 from 1964.  In general, it would be reasonable to assume that as stock prices rise, but especially if the P/E multiple rises, companies would generally want to issue stock.  Thus, the divisor would be expected to follow the overall movement of the market.  And, from 1964 until 2004, that was generally true.  The two series were positively correlated at the 74.9% level.  However, from 2005 to the present, despite a major bull market from 2009 to 2020, the trend in the divisor was lower.  In fact, the sign of the correlation reversed to negative.

The divisor is used to calculate earnings per share; a falling divisor boosts the earnings per share reading.  If we assume that the divisor had remained at the most recent peak in 2011, the chart below shows the impact on earnings per share.

This chart shows operating earnings on a rolling four-quarter basis.  Using Q4 2019, the latest actual data available,[1] the reported operating earnings per share was $157.12; adjusting for the 2011 peak divisor shows a reading of $143.28.

The extensive policy actions taken by the government and the Federal Reserve to backstop the economy and the financial markets will likely come with the costs of direct regulations and social control.  In other words, taking the government’s money or using the Fed’s balance sheet to simply support shareholders through dividends and buybacks is probably not going to be possible.  If that is the case, it is highly likely that earnings growth will be less than what we have seen in recent years.  Margins are another element we are monitoring; these have been remarkably strong for the past decade.  So far, we have not seen aggressive actions to reduce margins but a retreat from globalization and a return to regulation could bring down margins as well.

View the PDF


[1] These numbers will appear lower than what is commonly shown because we use data from Standard and Poor’s. The media usually reports data from Thomson/Reuters, the owners of I/B/E/S, the service that collects earnings estimates. Thomson/Reuters earnings tend to be about 7% higher than Standard and Poor’s.

Daily Comment (April 9, 2020)

by Bill O’Grady, Thomas Wash, and Patrick Fearon-Hernandez, CFA

[Posted: 9:30 AM EDT]

It’s Holy Thursday in the time of COVID-19.  With financial markets closed tomorrow for Good Friday, our next report will be published on Monday, April 13.  From all of us at Confluence Investment Management, we wish you a Happy Easter and Passover.  Equity markets are taking a breather today after the recent rally (although the breaking announcement by the Fed to boost lending has reversed the downtrend—see below), while oil is up on hopes of an output reduction agreement.  Our Weekly Energy Update is available.  Claims remain historically elevated.  We update the COVID-19 news.  Here are the details:

COVID-19:  The official number of global cases is 1,496,055 with 89,435 fatalities and 336,780 recoveries.  Here is the FT chart:

Clearly, Spain and Italy are bending the curve.  The U.S. is accelerating at a slower pace.

The virus news:

  • One of the persistent questions we are getting is, “when is this done?” A recent NYT report offers four benchmarks that need to be met for the current measures to be reduced:
    • Hospitals need to be able to safely treat all patients without resorting to crisis standards of care. This wouldn’t mean COVID-19 cases would not continue but that treating them would become routine.
    • The government at all levels must be able to treat everyone with symptoms.
    • The government at all levels must have the ability to monitor confirmed cases and perform contact tracing. This may require some relaxation of privacy rules.
    • A state or region must have a sustained reduction in cases for 14 days.
    • In addition to these four conditions, we will need to see serological testing to see who has immunity.
    • And, it isn’t really under control until there is a vaccine.

Once the four benchmarks are reached, we should see gradual relaxation of social distancing measures.  Still, until herd immunity develops, we will likely see some continued modified social distancing measures, e.g., fewer restaurant tables, masks for those over 60 or with compromised immune systems, temperature testing at airports, etc.

The policy news:

  • BREAKING: The Fed announced it will purchase $2.3 trillion in new debt purchases which includes the government’s small business loans, municipals, mortgages, and, maybe, non-investment grade (yes, junk) bonds. Details are still sketchy, but the initial look is that this is yet another dramatic expansion of funding.  Apparently, the Fed is not planning on buying junk directly but the ETFs; this is a bit of a distinction without a difference.  We will be watching this going forward BUT THIS IS A BIG DEAL.  The Fed is getting deeper into the “weeds” of credit, increasing the odds that the bank will eventually take credit losses.  We have been watching the Fed’s balance sheet expansion with great interest; it is looking increasingly like it is trying to resolve the large private debt overhang (defined as household and non-financial corporate debt) by taking it on the public balance sheet.  The last time we witnessed this sort of public/private debt swap was WWII.  The alternative to dealing with this overhang is debt/deflation, which has become politically impossible.  The last 12 years of very low rates allowed the overhang to persist without triggering a downturn but also led to weak growth.  This debt swap may be the only way out, but there will be strings attached.
  • The Fed minutes held no real surprises, but did clearly show a high level of concern.
  • Europe continues to struggle to develop a response to the economic problems caused by the virus. It appears that the European Stability Mechanism (ESM), a body created during the 2010-11 Eurocrisis, will be the lending arm; Eurobonds look like a dead letter.  Apparently, northern European nations are open to lending out of the ESM but want “memorandums of understanding” that would put restrictions on borrowers.  This demand is toxic for southern Europe, a holdover of what Greece was required to accept during the Eurocrisis.  Thus, not much has been accomplished.
  • Congressional bickering over additional fiscal support is making headlines; the GOP wants a quick add to small business lending, while the Democrats want to add more money and other funding. Although much ink (or electrons) is spilt over this wrangling, this is rather normal.  We expect something to be passed in the next week or so.
  • The firehose of policy stimulus has a couple of caveats. First, using the banking system as a conduit has proven to be rather clunky.  Second, there is a surprising lack of oversight on both fiscal and monetary policy.  The lack of oversight at this stage opens up the potential for retroactive supervision years from now; you could see borrowers being questioned before Congress at some point.
  • A warning: the CFTC is reporting a surge in new scams involving complex derivatives. The common feature is high fees.

The economic news:

The market news:

The foreign policy news:

View the complete PDF

Weekly Energy Update (April 9, 2020)

by Bill O’Grady, Thomas Wash, and Patrick Fearon-Hernandez, CFA

Crude oil inventories rose 15.2 mb compared to the forecast rise of 9.0 mb.

In the details, U.S. crude oil production fell 0.6 mbpd to 12.4 mbpd.  Exports fell 0.3 mbpd, while imports declined 0.2 mbpd.  Refining activity fell 6.7%, well more than the 1.8% decline forecast.  The inventory build was due to a combination of falling exports and a severe decline in refinery operations which offset the decline in production.

(Sources: DOE, CIM)

The above chart shows the annual seasonal pattern for crude oil inventories.  The last two weeks have pushed stockpiles almost “off the charts.”  Although not totally unexpected, this is the first week where the impact of COVID-19 and the oil war has started to affect the weekly data.

Based on our oil inventory/price model, fair value is $45.11; using the euro/price model, fair value is $44.63.  The combined model, a broader analysis of the oil price, generates a fair value of $43.44.  Usually, the fair value from the combined model falls within the values generated by the individual models.  Recent volatility has led to some model instability, so the combined model is generating the lowest forecast price.  As we noted recently, the model output is less relevant unless Russia and the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia (KSA) come to an agreement on supply.  At the same time, it does show that prices in the mid-$20s have discounted a good bit of bad news.  However, there is a non-linearity tied to the loss of storage capacity that cannot be fully captured with these models.  If storage capacity is fully utilized, a catastrophic decline in prices, which we would define as low teens, is possible.

As promised, here are a couple of charts that look at U.S. oil demand.  The chart below shows the four-week average of gasoline supplied to the distribution system.  As the chart shows, shipments have cratered.  Distillate demand is holding up better, reflecting the increases in delivery of goods.

This is a longer-term view of refinery activity.

The last time we saw a drop of this magnitude was during the depths of the Great Financial Crisis.  Over the past two weeks, refineries have reduced their oil consumption by 2.2 mbpd, far exceeding the drop of 0.4 mbpd in production.  The underlying fundamentals for crude oil continue to deteriorate.  The DOE reduced its forecast for U.S. production this year to 11.8 mbpd.  This means that production can be expected to decline further.

Oil prices have held up rather well because of hope of a broad deal between OPEC+others to reduce production.  President Trump is threatening all sorts of actions, including tariffs and anti-dumping legislation.  There is a risk to all this—such actions will raise gasoline prices over time.  However, that isn’t a problem in the near term.  As the above chart shows, people aren’t driving all that much.  Still, we think the president doesn’t really want to directly intervene, but merely threaten Russia and the KSA into agreeing to cut output.  Russia has reportedly agreed to cut 1.6 mbpd, which is boosting prices this morning.

We remain highly skeptical that a deal can be fashioned among the wide number of participants, but we would be surprised if no deal is announced.  But, announcing is one thing, while actually cutting is another matter.  Another point to consider—oil futures prices are running well above cash barrels as speculators hoping for a deal are buying in the futures market.  At some point, these physical barrel holders are going to rush to sell their actual oil into the futures market to capture the spread.  Don’t be surprised to see a “buy rumor, sell fact” trade post-agreement.

View the PDF

Daily Comment (April 8, 2020)

by Bill O’Grady, Thomas Wash, and Patrick Fearon-Hernandez, CFA

[Posted: 9:30 AM EDT]

Yesterday’s optimism about a potential peak in the coronavirus crisis is being undermined a bit today by reports of re-tightened lockdowns in some countries and the failure of EU finance ministers to agree on an aid program for hard-hit European countries.  We review all the key virus news along with other odds and ends below.

COVID-19:  Official data show confirmed cases have risen to 1,446,242 worldwide, with 83,424 deaths and 308,146 recoveries.  In the United States, confirmed cases rose to 399,929, with 12,911 deaths and 22,539 recoveries.  Here is the chart of infections now being published by the Financial Times:

Virology

Real Economy

U.S. Fiscal Policy Response

Foreign Fiscal Policy Response

Odds & Ends:  Afghan and Taliban negotiators have broken off talks on a prisoner swap meant to pave the way toward a peace agreement, just weeks after U.S. Secretary of State Pompeo rescued the talks from a similar near-failure.

View the complete PDF

Daily Comment (April 7, 2020)

by Bill O’Grady, Thomas Wash, and Patrick Fearon-Hernandez, CFA

[Posted: 9:30 AM EDT]

After yesterday’s strong market action, investors are again in risk-on mode based on optimism that the coronavirus pandemic may be peaking.  We report on all the key developments relating to the virus as well as building pressure for a cut in oil production and Chinese use of the pandemic as cover for more mischief in the South China Sea.

COVID-19:  Official data show confirmed cases have risen to 1,362,936 worldwide, with 76,373 deaths and 292,188 recoveries.  In the United States, confirmed cases rose to 368,449, with 10,993 deaths and 19,919 recoveries (though the recovery data is lagging).  Here is the chart of infections now being published by the Financial Times:

Virology

Real Economy

Financial Markets

U.S. Fiscal Policy Response

U.S. Monetary Policy Response

Foreign Fiscal Policy Response

Political Fallout

Global Oil Market:  Ahead of Thursday’s virtual meeting between OPEC, Russia, and other major oil producers to address the Saudi-Russia price war, Saudi Arabia and its OPEC partners are warning that global storage capacity will soon be completely full and prices could fall further.  The warning aims to put pressure on Russia and other major producers, including the U.S. and Canada, to cut output on Saudi terms in order to support prices.

United States-China:  The U.S. State Department has issued a statement condemning China for using one of its coast guard ships to ram and sink a Vietnamese fishing boat in a disputed area of the South China Sea last week.  The incident suggests China is again trying to assert its sovereignty over the region while the world’s attention is diverted by the coronavirus pandemic.

View the complete PDF

Weekly Geopolitical Report – Could the Coronavirus Pandemic Break Up the EU? – Part II (April 6, 2020)

by Patrick Fearon-Hernandez, CFA

(Note: Due to the Easter holiday, our next report will be published on April 20.)

In Part I of this report we examined the history of the European Union (EU), how it works, and the political, economic, and social fissures that had already rendered it unstable when the COVID-19 pandemic took hold.  This week, we look at several recent policy moves that various EU countries have taken in response to the pandemic, and we explain why those policy moves could potentially push the EU over the tipping point toward disintegration if they are carried too far.  As always, we’ll wrap up with a discussion of the possible economic consequences of a break-up and the ramifications for investors.

The Temptation to Barricade
As we discussed in Part I, the founders of the EU believed that preventing another major war on European soil could be accomplished, in part, by an “ever-closer union among the peoples of Europe.”  The EU is often seen mostly as an economic arrangement (i.e., a customs union coupled with a free-trade area), but its founding principles are broader than that.  The EU aspires to the free movement of virtually all people, goods, services, and capital.  Unfortunately, the COVID-19 pandemic has tempted EU leaders to erect barriers in these areas.

View the full report

Daily Comment (April 6, 2020)

by Bill O’Grady, Thomas Wash, and Patrick Fearon-Hernandez, CFA

[Posted: 9:30 AM EDT]

Happy Monday!  Global equities are rising on hopes that the pandemic is stabilizing.  We update the COVID-19 news.  Here are the details:

COVID-19:  The official number of global cases is 1,280,046, with 69,789 fatalities and 265,462 recoveries.  Here is the updated FT chart:

We have received requests for a chart weighted by population.  We found this one yesterday.

Note that Japan’s numbers are rising at a slow pace but showing no signs of “bending.”  We suspect the recent action to declare a limited state of emergency (see below) is due to worries that an exponential rise may be in the offing.

The virus news:

The policy news:

  • Our position has been that the COVID-19 recession would be historically deep in terms of magnitude but short in duration. That belief was based on the expectation that policymakers would move quickly to support the economy and virus suppression efforts would relax by autumn.  Like all our forecasts, they are always subject to re-evaluation.  We have three immediate concerns:
  • Meanwhile, Germany continues to push back against a Eurobond, instead calling for more emergency lending. If this continues, the Eurozone will be in grave danger.
  • The UN is warning that it is facing a budget crunch due to spending on COVID-19.

The economic news:

  • One observation from Friday’s March employment report is that there was significant divergence between the payroll survey and the household survey with reference to employment.  As most of you are aware, the employment report consists of two different surveys, one gathered from employers and the other from households.  The employer survey is where the non-farm payrolls number is generated.  The household report is where the unemployment rate comes from.  The two numbers often diverge; the payroll report will capture those working at traditional businesses, while the household report is better at capturing sole proprietors and gig workers.  In March, payrolls fell 976k; employment from the household survey plunged 2.9 million.  The household survey is sobering, suggesting conditions are much worse than they look.

The market news:

  • Oil prices plunged overnight on news that a spat between Russia and the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia (KSA) has delayed today’s scheduled meeting on output reduction. The meeting will be held on Thursday.  We have seen prices rally off the lows as the market is betting that a deal will be made at some point.  However, the fact that a “you started it; no, you started it” fight between adult leaders of Russia and the KSA has led to a delay is a clear indication that managing these egos will be a challenge.
  • Meanwhile, President Trump has backed away from his threat to implement tariffs on oil. Although such ideas have been circulating for some time, it is important to note that a tariff might not be all that effective in propping up prices.  Assume the U.S. puts a $10 per barrel tariff on imported oil.  Foreign prices will likely fall in response, but perhaps even more importantly the dollar will soar.  The dollar strength will have unintended consequences for the global financial system.  If the government wants to support oil producers (after all, why should any government outside of OPEC want higher oil prices), a better tactic would be to do what we do for farmers.  Simply set a price for oil and pay oil companies the difference between the world price and the desired price.  Although this would require a massive “spend” of political capital, we could see it as part of a stimulus bill.
  • So, will we get a deal or not? We suspect that a deal will be struck and will likely collapse in short order.  Both Russia and the KSA want a wide agreement with other producers to prevent the loss of market share.  However, any reading of cartel behavior shows that the larger the cartel, the less likely it is that it will avoid free riders.
  • One interesting piece of evidence on how much oil demand has declined: air quality around the world is showing remarkable improvement.
  • One fallout from the virus is that Chinese household borrowing is slowing rapidly, and bad debt is rising.

View the complete PDF