Daily Comment (April 28, 2020)

by Bill O’Grady, Thomas Wash, and Patrick Fearon-Hernandez, CFA

[Posted: 9:30 AM EDT]

Market sentiment continues to get a boost from the fact that many foreign governments and various U.S. states are easing their coronavirus restrictions.  As always, we review all the latest virus news below.  We also provide an update on the continued mystery of North Korean leader Kim Jong Un’s whereabouts.

COVID-19:  Official data show confirmed cases have risen to 3,060,152 worldwide, with 212,056 deaths and 905,662 recoveries.  In the United States, confirmed cases rose to 988,469, with 56,253 deaths and 111,583 recoveries.  Here is the chart of infections now being published by the Financial Times:

Virology

Real Economy

Financial Markets

U.S. Policy Responses

International Policy Responses

United States:  The FOMC begins its latest policy meeting today.  The policymakers are widely expected to leave the interest-rate policy unchanged when they announce their decision tomorrow.  However, given the wide range of support programs the Fed has undertaken to help cushion the economy from the COVID-19 crisis, all eyes will be on any potential new moves that might be announced in the accompanying statement.

North Korea:  Paramount leader Kim Jong Un remains out of sight, leaving foreign governments unsure about whether he is still alive and in control of the country.  South Korean officials insist Kim is well, but South Korea and the U.S. scrambled six reconnaissance planes to spy on North Korea yesterday amid rumors he is dangerously ill.  The North Korean government uses a highly refined system of secrecy and diversion to keep the outside world from knowing what’s going on with its leader.

View the complete PDF

Weekly Geopolitical Report – Revisiting Scheidel’s Horsemen: Part II (April 27, 2020)

by Bill O’Grady

In Part I, we introduced Walter Scheidel’s four horsemen and examined the impact of COVID-19 using his framework.[1]  This week, we introduce the equality/ efficiency cycle and discuss the first issue that would be affected by the reversal of this cycle.

COVID-19 and the Equality/Efficiency Cycle
We postulate that economies pass through cycles of equality and efficiency.  We developed this concept based on the seminal work of three scholars.  The first strand is the idea of the equality/efficiency tradeoff, which comes from Arthur Okun.[2]  He argued that societies face a tradeoff between equality and efficiency.  Efficiency is necessary for growth, while equality is required for political and social stability.  However, there is no evidence that Okun saw this tradeoff as a cycle; instead, he saw it as two competing forces to be constantly balanced.

The second source of our postulate is from Peter Turchin, who suggested that countries cycle between periods of greater or lesser equality.  In the following chart, Turchin shows this cycle in the U.S. from the early 1800s to 2000.  Measuring inequality (red line) is a simple calculation that originated with Kevin Phillips.  It is the ratio of the largest fortune in the U.S. relative to average household wealth.  The well-being line (blue line) is the detrended and log-transformed level of social optimism, which is the average age of marriage, along with the wages of production workers divided by per-capita GDP, life expectancy and average height.  The chart shows that well-being is inversely correlated to inequality.

(Source: Peter Turchin)

The third source of our thesis comes from Walter Scheidel, who suggests that efficiency cycles are the norm due to the power of capital.  Efficiency continues until it is stopped by one of four major disruptions: mass mobilization war, revolution, societal collapse or pandemic.

Therefore, our thesis is the following:

  1. Societies face a tradeoff between equality and efficiency.
  2. This tradeoff leads to cycles in which the goals of one or the other dominate.
  3. The natural course is for efficiency to dominate because capital tends to accumulate economic and political power over time.
  4. What reverses the dominant trend is a cataclysmic event, i.e., mass mobilization war, revolution, collapse of social order, pandemic.
  5. What reverses an equality cycle is persistent inflation, which is usually supported by equality policies of trade impediments, immigration control and regulation.

View the full report


[1] Scheidel, Walter. (2017). The Great Leveler: Violence and the History of Inequality from the Stone Age to the Twenty-First Century. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

[2] Okun, Arthur. (1975). Equality and Efficiency: The Big Tradeoff. Washington, D.C.: Brookings Institution Press.

Daily Comment (April 27, 2020)

by Bill O’Grady, Thomas Wash, and Patrick Fearon-Hernandez, CFA

[Posted: 9:30 AM EDT]

Good morning and happy Monday!  It’s central bank week; the BOJ has spoken, while the Fed and ECB meet later this week.  Equity futures are pointing to another higher opening and there are widespread reports of nations easing social distancing measures.  Oil prices are falling.  We update the COVID-19 news.  Here are the details:

COVID-19:  The number of reported cases is 2,982,933 with 206,8111 deaths and 881,635 recoveries.  In the U.S., there are 965,933 confirmed cases with 54,877 deaths and 107,045 recoveries.  Here is the FT chart:

The virus news:

  • The WHO announced over the weekend that there is currently “no evidence” that people who have been infected by COVID-19 have developed antibodies that protect them from reinfection. There has been speculation that once a person is infected by the virus that a degree of immunity would be conferred.   That would allow governments to use serological tests to determine the degree of immunity and maybe issue “passports” that would allow those with immunity to return to normal activities.  However, that assumes that once infected, a person would be protected.  There has been evidence of those who were previously infected having caught the virus again.  In that regard, COVID-19 may behave like the common cold or influenza.
  • Despite these concerns, there has been a rush to develop tests to determine who has been infected. Sadly, their reliability remains suspect.
  • The FT has published a report that argues the death toll from COVID-19 could be 60% higher than reported. The study compares average death rates across 14 countries to normal and assumes increased death rates are likely from the virus.  The statistical counts we report each day should be treated as estimates; as an example, the spread between estimated fatality rates from the 1918 Spanish influenza varies widely even more than a century after the event.  This article’s methodology clearly has flaws (not all of the deaths above average have come from the virus), but it does act as a check on the official data.
  • Although global mortality continues to show that age is a risk factor, doctors in the U.S. are reporting that young people who have been infected with COVID-19 are facing blood clotting issues and are suffering from strokes. Although the number of cases isn’t large, it is occurring with enough frequency that researchers are documenting the phenomena.  In what may be a related story, the autopsy of the Santa Clara County woman, who was the earliest confirmed fatality from the virus, concluded that she died of a massive heart attack that led the sack around her heart to fill with blood and “rupture.”
  • Another twist to COVID-19 is that it seems to undermine lung capacity well before those infected discover it. Patients infected with the virus will have oxygen saturation readings well below the normal 94% to 100%.  Some are reported to have saturation as low as 50% with only mild symptoms.  The reaction, known as “silent hypoxia,” means that those infected are quite sick but don’t have the classic symptoms such as shortness of breath.  By the time they have noticeable trouble breathing, their oxygen saturation is at dangerously low levels and can progress to critical status quickly.
  • Boris Johnson is back to work.
  • Nursing homes continue to be an area of concern everywhere; France has been especially hard hit.

The policy news:

  • The Fed meets this week. We do not expect any policy action to be announced given the huge actions already taken.  So, don’t expect much in the statement.  The press conference, on the other hand, could be interesting.  We are watching for two things—first, how does the chair handle the negative interest rate question, and second, what about expanding the municipal bond backstop?  On the first, expect the Fed to demur; on the second, expect promises to help if necessary.
  • The Small Business Administration has moved to not allowing hedge funds or private equity firms to acquire small business rescue loans. It is also limiting the ability of firms owned by private equity to borrow on the payroll protection program.  Hospitals purchased by private equity firms are demanding bailouts or they are threatening to close in the midst of a pandemic.  Meanwhile, there is a “shaming” underway for larger firms that are taking bailout funds.  The popular view is that the bailout money is helping the local bar and grill; in reality, anytime the government offers money, all sorts of people will line up to take it.  And, helping larger firms can reduce the impact on unemployment.  But this isn’t how the public frames the debate, so larger firms are caught; do they take needed funds and risk the public relations backlash, or forego the money and hurt their companies?
  • Another twist is that bankrupt companies can’t get stimulus money. This decision might actually be very bad for energy companies.
  • States are starting to reopen, but slowly. To a great extent, governors and mayors are trying to balance public safety with the need for economic growth.  Complicating matters, as we noted in the virus news, is that we don’t really know everything about COVID-19.  Thus, what may seem like a reasonable decision could look like a terrible mistake in the eyes of historians years from now.  The news of reopening is helping equities this morning.

The economic news:

  • In our memory, we can’t ever remember government-related entities issuing dire forecasts for the economy. Whether it be the IMF, OECD, World Bank or the Congressional Budget office, we rarely see a forecast of bad news.  However, recently, we have seen the IMF and the World Bank issue bearish forecasts.  The CBO has just forecast a deep decline in GDP for Q2.

The snapback in Q3 is mostly a function of annualization.  The key point to focus on is the level of GDP.  Note that the level of GDP remains below the recent peak of $21.7 billion reported in Q4 2019.  According to this forecast, nominal GDP won’t reach the peak this year.

  • Chinese households have been increasing their debt in recent years. Although the level remains below that of the U.S., which is around 75% of GDP, the slowdown caused by COVID-19 is increasing pressure on China’s households.

The market news:

The foreign policy news:

North Korea:  As promised, we continue to monitor developments tied to the disappearance of Kim Jong Un.  South Korean Defense Minister Jeong Kyeong-doo indicated that North Korea has increased inspections of its artillery’s readiness and has been increasing air force operations.  The most threatening part of North Korea’s military is its artillery.  Massed along the border, it could cause serious damage to Seoul and would take a major air campaign to suppress.  The fact that it is holding inspections and increasing combat readiness could be indicating preparations.  We also note that China has suspended some rail traffic in Dalian.  Although this move is probably in response to COVID-19 infections, Dalian is close enough to North Korea that if the PLA needed to move troops to the border, it would probably use trains from this major port city.

The site 38o North is reporting that a train known to be used by the Kim family has been at the Wonsan compound since April 21.  This merely shows that the train is in place but doesn’t indicate anything about Kim’s condition.  Media accounts continue to conflict.  Sources in Hong Kong and Japan have reported that he is in a vegetative stateSouth Korean media continues to report that Kim is “alive and well.”  Reuters reported that China has sent a team of doctors to advise on Kim’s condition; if this story is accurate, it lends credence to the idea that the “young general” is suffering a serious medical problem.  So, what do we think?  First, it is really hard to know what is going on in North Korea; it isn’t called the Hermit Kingdom for nothing.  Second, we find it a bit odd that a young man could have such terrible heart disease.  It’s not unprecedented, but unusual.  Third, it is quite possible that COVID-19 is running rampant through North Korea and Kim has decided to evade the public in order to avoid infection.  Kim has disappeared before, sparking rumors, only to return later.  Simply put, we don’t know and neither does anyone else outside of the Kim family.

As we reported last week, if Kim is indeed dead or incapacitated, it isn’t clear who would be next in line to the “throne.”  North Korea is a dynastic kingdom acting as if it is Marxist.  Although Kim has a sister who plays a prominent role in the government, we have doubts that the Korean people are ready for a “queen” to rule.  Both China and South Korea fear a breakdown of the regime, worried that it might trigger a refugee crisis.

Turkey:  Ankara riled the U.S. and NATO when it purchased the S-400 missile system from Moscow.  The system has been delivered but President Erdogan has decided to “leave it in the box” for now.  The U.S. is prepared to invoke the Countering America’s Adversaries Through Sanctions Act (CAATSA) against Turkey for buying the S-400.  Turkey’s collapsing economy is likely leading Ankara to avoid deploying the missile system and triggering the CAATSA sanctions.  Turkey has also approached the Fed about a currency swap line.  Given the turmoil in the region, Erdogan has apparently concluded that angering the U.S. is a bad idea and decided that the benefits of the missile system do not outweigh maintaining relations with Washington.

China:  The U.S. has pulled its heavy bombers from Guam.  The Air Force has had nuclear weapons-capable bombers on Guam since 2004.  The DoD argues that both North Korea and China have missiles that can reach Guam, putting the bombers at risk.  In addition, they can still attack both targets from North Dakota and Missouri and not be at risk from the same type of missile attack.  At the same time, the symbolism of the U.S. removing these assets will not be lost on U.S. allies in the region.

China has arrested five former employees of Huawei (002502, CNY 3.31) who claimed on social media that the company did, indeed, sell products to Iran, violating U.S. sanctions.  This news comes at a time when public opinion of China is falling rapidly.

Iran:  In a twist, the U.S. is arguing that it remains a participant in the Iran nuclear deal.  This is being done to press the U.N. Security Council to extend the arms embargo or increase sanctions.  The current ban expires in October and Washington is likely worried that trade with Tehran will rise after the expiration.  The U.S. is using this ploy to trigger the “snapback” provisions of the agreement.  This situation will become more important as summer ends.  Stay tuned…

View the complete PDF

Asset Allocation Weekly (April 24, 2020)

by Asset Allocation Committee

As the COVID-19 pandemic continues to evolve, we are watching to see how the disease will affect the economy longer term.  Of course, projections of this sort are highly probabilistic; factors could and will likely emerge that could render these projections irrelevant.  At the same, ignoring potential long-term consequences of the virus could lead to improper decisions, failing to fully appreciate the changes the disease has caused.

In this week’s report, we will look at demographics.  Demographic analysis is important because it is a “deep background” of what affects markets.  Demographic change tends to occur slowly but can be rather easily forecast far into the future.  Thus, if a variable is sensitive to changes in the population, it can be rather simple to forecast trends well into the future.

The baby boom, encompassing Americans born during 1946-64, has always been the “pig in the snake” for demographers.  When this generation reached school age, the number of elementary enrollments jumped.  Later, in the mid-1970s, enrollment fell and led to empty school buildings.

(Source: Goldin, Claudia. “A Brief History of Education in the United States,” NBER, Aug. 1999.)

The current age range for the baby boom is 56 to 74.  In another seven years, this entire generation will reach retirement age.  The chart below shows that the population share 65 years and older is set to rise rapidly for the next two decades.  Demographers for years have been warning that the mass retirement of this generation would cause problems in the labor market, predicting that employers would be scrambling to fill positions.

That hasn’t happened yet for a number of reasons—globalization has allowed firms to tap labor resources abroad, immigration has offset some of the retirement numbers, and baby boomers have continued to work longer.

At the turn of the century, the participation rate[1] was around 12.5%.  It has steadily increased to over 20%, although it has recently declined.  Essentially, baby boomers, which include nine years of this group, appear to have remained in the labor force.  We suspect there are two reasons.  First, as life expectancies have increased, wealthier boomers, who are probably healthy, likely wanted to remain working.  Second, less affluent boomers probably needed to keep working as long as possible due to the lack of retirement saving.

COVID-19 could reverse this participation trend.  The fatality rate of the virus tends to rise with age.  Older workers who have stayed in the labor force may decide that the threat of infection is too high and thus opt to retire.  If a broad-spectrum vaccine is developed, this potential trend could be thwarted, but if COVID-19 mutates like influenza and requires an annual vaccination of varying effectiveness, a vaccine might not be enough to prevent older workers from exiting the workforce.  A decline in older worker participation would reduce the labor force; if that action occurs along with restrictions on immigration and trade impediments, all tenets of deglobalization, we would expect the labor share of national income to rise.

View the PDF


[1] The participation rate is the labor force (employed + unemployed seeking employment)/population eligible to be in the labor force.

Daily Comment (April 24, 2020)

by Bill O’Grady, Thomas Wash, and Patrick Fearon-Hernandez, CFA

[Posted: 9:30 AM EDT]

Good morning!  Equity futures are pointing to a modestly higher opening; oil prices are also higher.  We update the COVID-19 news.  Here are the details:

COVID-19:  The number of reported cases is 2,721,354 with 191,231 deaths and 745,605 recoveries.  In the U.S., there are 869,172 confirmed cases with 49,963 deaths and 80,934 recoveries.  Here is the FT chart:

Here is another website to add to your COVID-19 monitor.  It attempts to measure the R0 (pronounced “R-naught”) by state.  That number tells you how many new cases are generated by each infection.  A R0 greater than one would mean that each infection generates more than one new infection.  Thus, one should be careful about relaxing social distancing standards if the reading is greater than one.  Although this is an interesting site, the output is only as good as the data input.  In other words, the actual count of infections is necessary to generate the R0.  But, even with that caveat, watching the history of the data does show that social distancing has had a positive impact on reducing new cases.

Although we have seen some impressive data analysis on the virus, the data collection itself remains a problem.  Nations have reasons to manipulate the data for political reasons; perhaps the nation with the most serious undercount is Brazil.  Its leader, Jair Bolsonaro, had downplayed the impact of COVID-19; in his defense, Brazil may not have much of a choice.  Its economy can’t afford to engage in social distancing, so Brazil needs to acquire herd immunity through widespread infection.  It is a risky strategy, but one we may see repeated elsewhere.  We note that Africa may become the next hot spot for COVID-19.

The virus news:

  • There were mixed headlines on the virus over the past 24 hours. Here is the good news:
    • An antibody survey in New York State showed wide exposure to COVID-19. The survey of 3,000 people showed that 14% were carrying antibodies and 21% of those from New York City were carrying antibodies.  The caveats:
      • The sample is small and not random. Participants volunteered at shopping centers, meaning they were healthy enough to be circulating.
      • Although 14% and 22% is a start, herd immunity requires at least 70% of the population to be carrying the antibody. Achieving herd immunity through infections isn’t really possible (that’s why parents used to have “chickenpox parties” because it was better to get a child exposed early; however, the fact that these parties were held showed that the virus still circulated and herd immunity was not achieved).  On the other hand, rising numbers of those who are likely immune would allow those who survived an infection to go back to regular activities.
    • The bad news:
    • And the interesting news:
      • There has been a strong call for ventilators in the COVID-19 crisis. However, there is increasing nuance in deciding when to use the machines.  More doctors are concluding they should be used as a last resort.  In some cases, it appears the lung damage from intubation and ventilation is so great that the use of the machines may need to be curtailed.
      • A study of transmission in China shows that, by far, the most dangerous place one can be for the virus is indoors. The study suggested that the most common transmission came in homes (probably from an infected family member), followed by transportation.  The safest place to be was outdoors.  It’s not that there were no reports of outdoor transmission but there was only one out of 7,324 that was identified as suffering from outdoor transmission.  Here is the paper.  If other research confirms this study, we could see parks reopen, and concerts and religious services being held outdoors.

The policy news:

  • The House has passed the most recent support package; it goes off to the White House where President Trump is expected to sign it into law.
  • The next round will be much more challenging. We see five brewing problems that will likely need federal attention and additional support.  All are fraught with political risk.
    • State and local governments are in deep trouble. High job losses have led to massive demand on unemployment insurance.  Although the weekly claims data has soared, the antiquated systems the states use to process claims have been balky; there has been a surge in demand for COBOL programmers, an indication of the age of these systems.  Funds for unemployment insurance are being drained.  Medical care costs have hit state coffers as well.  This need for support is running headlong into a deep political divide.  Some state governments over the years have made pension promises they probably can’t keep.  While the union movement has been languishing for years in the private sector, it continues to flourish in the public sector.  The GOP fired a broadside yesterday, suggesting these governments should avail themselves to the bankruptcy courts, which would likely force the reduction of pension payments and abrogate union contracts.  Democrats oppose this idea and want to give states aid.
    • The Energy sector continues to reel. Although the drop in oil prices has caught the attention of the media (nothing like a unique event like negative prices to generate interest), the bigger story is that the industry is struggling.  Treasury Secretary Mnuchin is considering a lending program for the oil industry.  This is where the politics flip; oil production tends to be centered on the red states and Democrats, especially left-wing populists, are strongly opposed to fossil fuels.  It is possible the administration could bypass Congress and prompt the Fed to lend directly to the industry or backstop bank loans.  But, much of this debt is very risky, which would expose the Fed to losses.  At the same time, a disorderly collapse of the Energy sector would be a risk to the broader economy.
    • The postal service is in financial trouble again. Although it has received some assistance, the administration appears to want to prompt significant changes to its business model in return for a bailout.  We would not just expect higher rates on package shipping but a renegotiation of union contracts for postal workers.
    • Policymakers face a dilemma with private equity. Often, firms that are bought by private equity firms have their assets leveraged to support the debt used to buy them.  As the downturn worsens, the firms purchased by private equity will likely fall into trouble; bailing them out could end up supporting the private equity firms that purposely weakened the target company’s balance sheet.  Preventing bailouts means innocent workers could lose their jobs and worsen the downturn, but bailouts increase the risk of privatizing the profits and socializing the risk.
    • The government has allowed homeowners forbearance with federally backed mortgages. However, the legislation apparently didn’t tell servicers how this would work.  According to reports, some servicers are offering only short breaks in payment and demanding a balloon payment once forbearance ends.  We have been saying for some time that mortgage servicers will need support; until they get it, their offers of forbearance will be so onerous that few borrowers will want it.  At the same time, many of the mortgage servicers are the largest banks.  As the smaller ones are not supported, further concentration in the industry is certain.
    • From our perspective, all five issues could cause disruptions that would have an adverse impact on financial markets. For example, muni bankruptcies won’t just force public workers to be the only party to bear the cost of adjustment; bondholders will almost certainly do so as well.  If bond obligations for state and local governments become a credit issue on a systemic basis, it would cause a serious jolt to the financial system in a time of great risk.  Allowing broad business failures in Energy could spill over into other areas of the financial system.  As 2008 showed, it is hard to know where systemic risk emerges.  The same is true with private equity.  And, in a period when home delivery is expanding, a postal strike would be a problem.  So far, policymakers have done a good job in preventing a widespread decline in the financial markets but the longer this goes on and the more contentions the political issues become, the greater the chances are that a mistake is made.
  • The Fed will begin disclosing who it is lending to in a new report.
  • So far, Japan has been the largest participant in the Fed’s forex swap program.

The economic news:

The foreign policy news:

View the complete PDF

Business Cycle Report (April 23, 2020)

by Thomas Wash

The business cycle has a major impact on financial markets; recessions usually accompany bear markets in equities.  We have created this report to keep our readers apprised of the potential for recession, which we plan to update on a monthly basis.  Although it isn’t the final word on our views about recession, it is part of our process in signaling the potential for a downturn.

In March, the diffusion index nearly fell into recession territory. The weakness in the report was primarily due to the coronavirus pandemic, turmoil in the financial markets and the Saudi-Russia oil dispute. Last month, confirmed cases of COVID-19 in the U.S. rose from 74 at the start of the month and grew to over 180,000. Meanwhile, the oil price war between Saudi Arabia and Russia led oil prices to fall to a near-20-year low. As a result, equities dropped and Treasuries rallied. The interest rate on the 10-year T-note fell below 1.0% for the first time ever. Additionally, the manufacturing sector showed mixed signals as a slowdown in delivery times reflected positively in the report despite a drop in new durable goods orders. The employment numbers were abysmal and will likely be worse in next month’s report. In this report, six out of the 11 indicators were in recession territory. The reading for March fell to +0.333 from +0.57, a hair above the recession signal of +0.250.

The chart above shows the Confluence Diffusion Index. It uses a three-month moving average of 11 leading indicators to track the state of the business cycle. The red line signals when the business cycle is headed toward a contraction, while the blue line signals when the business cycle is headed toward a recovery. On average, the diffusion index is currently providing about six months of lead time for a contraction and five months of lead time for a recovery. Continue reading for a more in-depth understanding of how the indicators are performing and refer to our Glossary of Charts at the back of this report for a description of each chart and what it measures. A chart title listed in red indicates that indicator is signaling recession.

View the complete PDF

Daily Comment (April 23, 2020)

by Bill O’Grady, Thomas Wash, and Patrick Fearon-Hernandez, CFA

[Posted: 9:30 AM EDT]

Good morning!  Ramadan begins this evening.  Equities are steady this morning as financial markets digest historically weak economic data out of Europe.  Meanwhile, oil prices continue to recover; we update our views on oil in this week’s Weekly Energy Update.  We also update the COVID-19 news below, and, proving that geopolitics, like rust, never sleeps, we update geopolitical concerns over North Korea and China.  Here are the details:

COVID-19:  The number of reported cases is 2,647,512 with 184,372 deaths and 721,349 recoveries.  In the U.S., there are 842,624 confirmed cases with 46,785 deaths and 76,614 recoveries.  Here is the FT chart:

The virus news:

  • The reopening after lockdown is the next phase of the virus. We are watching with great interest the steps that various governments are using to make this work.
  • New reports indicate that the first confirmed case of COVID-19 occurred in Santa Clara as early as February 6. This means COVID-19 got here earlier than previously thought.
  • The most vulnerable to the virus appear to be residents of nursing homes.
  • Meanwhile, there remains great uncertainty about the veracity of the infection and fatality data. This report sheds some light on the issue by comparing overall death rates to normal rates in numerous nations.  One interesting sidelight is that Sweden’s fatality rate is only running about 12% above normal compared to Spain at 66% or England and Wales at 33%.  Sweden has been doing “lockdown-lite” and this data would suggest it is working, at least so far.
  • A new, and we must say, unsettling, development is being reported about COVID-19. Infections seem to be triggering difficult to control blood clotting in some patients.  Researchers are not sure but speculate that the clotting may be caused by the body’s reaction to the virus itself.  In other words, COVID-19 doesn’t directly lead to clotting but the body’s immune response triggers the reaction.  There were some reports of clotting overseas but the U.S., plagued by obesity and heart disease, is seeing more cases.  Apparently, it has become a risk factor for women immediately after childbirth.  This is the first time we have heard of this characteristic, but it might explain why age has become such a serious risk factor for the virus.
  • In China, testing of patients who have had the disease, recovered and are asymptomatic are still showing the virus remains present. It is unclear whether (a) these patients continue to shed the virus and are thus able to spread it, or (b) the tests are generating false positives.  It is universally held by researchers that the key to reopening economies and easing social restrictions is testing.  However, we are increasingly concerned the testing may be flawed.  When one creates an indicator, there is always a tension between sensitivity and accuracy.  Constructing an indicator for sensitivity will tend to give lots of positive signals but risk false positives.  Making one that leans toward accuracy means the test confirms clear cases but will miss borderline ones or generate false negatives.  This is simply a fact of creating such instruments.  We suspect researchers have feared false negatives more than false positives, which makes sense.  And, we note there has been little evidence that those who have recovered have been transmitting the disease to others.  However, if we go “all in” on testing, we could create situations where we believe we are surrounded by “typhoid Mary’s” who we quarantine when they pose no threat at all.
  • China is facing a new surge in cases in Heilongjiang province which borders Russia in the northeast. Local officials have imposed travel restrictions with Russia, fearing that the new cases are being imported from the north.
  • SOS Pompeo has accused China of deliberately destroying coronavirus samples as part of a cover-up to prevent analysts from determining the origin of COVID-19. This allegation continues the pattern of deteriorating relations between the U.S. and China.

The policy news:

  • There is a brewing battle between the Speaker of the House and the Majority leader in the Senate. State and local governments have increased their spending to respond to COVID-19.  Democrats wanted to boost support for state and local governments in the latest stimulus package but were rebuffed.  McConnell revealed his thoughts yesterday, suggesting state and local governments should probably avail themselves to the bankruptcy courts.
    • The position of state and local governments has been a brewing problem for some time. A number of states (our neighbors east, in particular) have difficult financial positions due to pension obligations.  Bankruptcy may be the only way to address the pension problem, forcing a resolution.
    • That might be a solution, but now is a potentially dangerous time to bring it up. Financial crises develop because asset holders fear a “run on the bank.”  If muni bond holders begin to believe their bonds could default on a widespread basis, it could trigger a mass selloff and lead to a broader financial crisis.
    • We will watch to see how the Fed and the White House react; our suspicion is that McConnell will get some sympathy for his position, but, in the end, there will be aid for state and local governments.
  • Another area we are watching closely is the mortgage industry. There are growing concerns that Fed support isn’t broad enough and the fiscal side isn’t doing enough either.
  • It appears the backlog for the Paycheck Protection Program is growing rapidly and may quickly exhaust the $320 billion new funding. Another item we discovered that we didn’t know before: there are moral clauses in SBA lending which are shutting out businesses for these loans.  We are starting to see talk of a stimulus idea that, in one form, which we noted over a month ago, would be a payroll tax holiday.  However, what is being considered now would put the plan on steroids; it would use the system in reverse to funnel money to firms that pay the payroll tax to subsidize keeping employees on the payroll.
  • As we note below, European PMI data fell to historically low levels. The European Commission is mulling a €2.0 trillion support package that includes loans and grants.   However, there has still been no movement on a Eurobond.

The economic news:

  • The preponderance of the data still points to a very weak economy. The NY FRB has issued a weekly estimate of GDP designed to show what the yearly change in GDP will be based on current data.  The index doesn’t have a long history, but it fits GDP rather well.  It is suggesting a nearly 11% yearly decline is on its way.  We will continue to monitor this data for insights into the path of the economy.

  • It’s not all bad, however. Daily consumer sentiment data from Morning Consult is suggesting that consumers remain glum, but conditions are not worsening.
  • The move to cash by households and firms has led to a massive jump in M2. This measure of the money supply is up over 15% from last year.  Under normal circumstances, this available liquidity would be considered bullish for future growth.  However, uncertainty surrounding the futures will, at least for a while, lead to a drop in velocity.

The market news:

  • Another meatpacking plant has been forced to close due to COVID-19. Tyson Foods (TSN, 59.92, -1.99) announced it would close its Waterloo, IA, pork processing plant, the largest in the company.  This follows closures by other firms in South Dakota.  We would expect pork shortages to begin developing very soon.
  • One of the consequences of working from home may be that households begin to realize that living in a big, expensive city may not be necessary for employment. That may lead to an exodus from these overcrowded areas into areas with lower costs of living.

The foreign policy news:

China:  China has been taking increasingly aggressive actions in the South China Sea.  Malaysia is reporting that a Chinese survey vessel has been operating in its waters without asking for permission.  This same ship, the Hai Yan Di Zhi 8, operated in a disputed area near Vietnam.  This is just the latest in a series of actions China has taken recently.  To some extent, this is nothing new; China has claimed the entire South China Sea as its own, but does appear to be using the distraction triggered by the COVID-19 pandemic to continue these actions.  The U.S. has responded by sending U.S. warships into the areaChina has also been accused of using social media to send fake messages into the U.S. designed to spread disinformation.  These actions, along with others, have been increasing anger at China, which may have an adverse reaction in the future.

North Korea:  Although COVID-19 is clearly dominating the news and markets, there are other concerns we are monitoring.  The mystery of Kim Jong Un’s health is front and center.  As we have noted, the “young general” has been out of sight for much of April.  He missed his grandfather’s birthday remembrance celebration on April 15.  There are reports, still not actually confirmed, that he had heart surgery, perhaps of an emergency nature.  Kim is said to be a heavy smoker and may be sporting a BMI of 45.  On the one hand, those risk factors would point to a cardiac problem; at the same time, there are plenty of men in their early 30s with those factors who do just fine.  It’s when they get a bit older that problems emerge.  Thus, if Kim needed bypass surgery at this age, that would be a problem.

At the same time, we are not seeing the sort of behavior we usually see when an authoritarian leader is stricken.  Often, if the leadership is in doubt, the military is confined to barracks to prevent a coup and, if a praetorian guard is in place, it is put on high alert.  None of these situations have been reported.  It is not uncommon for those whose status is totally dependent on the sickened leader to head for the exits when it looks like a new person is going to take over.  After all, the new leader will have his own people and the previous leader’s sycophants are usually dispatched either to remote and hostile areas of the country or to regions beyond this earthly pale.  There is no evidence of high-level defections.  This isn’t the first time Kim has disappeared; he was missing for a month in September 2014, only to reappear using a cane.  It was suspected the young leader fell victim to a bout of gout.  So, we do have to take care in overreacting.

Here are two items to consider. First, if Kim is really in grave danger, watch China and South Korea.  China is always worried about a collapse in Pyongyang because it will trigger a refugee crisis.  If we see Beijing take steps to aggressively seal the border with North Korea, it would probably mean something is up.  South Korea has similar worries.  Seoul is terrified of the costs West Germany bore to integrate East Germany.  Given how militarized the 38o parallel is, it would be suicidal for North Koreans to flee south unless the regime completely collapses.  But, if South Korea starts moving to protect the border, it may mean it knows the regime is in trouble.  Second, there are reports that Kim’s half-sister, Kim Yo Jong, would be the next in line for the “throne.”  We have serious reservations about this idea.  The Kim regime isn’t called the “Hermit Kingdom” for nothing; this is a dynastic system and it isn’t clear a woman would be accepted as leader.  She might, but it’s not guaranteed.  Kim Jong Un has an older brother, Kim Jong Chul.  The oldest brother, Kim Jong Nam, was assassinated in 2017.

The collapse of the North Korean regime would be a geopolitical mess.  There would be a scramble for power among the non-Kim leaders.  We could see a mass selloff of military hardware, and there is the aforementioned refugee crisis.  There are reports that the U.S. has contingency plans, which is good.  However, one must always remember Mike Tyson’s comment about plans.  If a breakdown occurs, equities in South Korea and Japan would be at highest risk.

Argentina:  The government missed a $503 million debt payment yesterday, starting the clock for default.  If an arrangement isn’t made in the 30-day grace period, there will be an official default on $65 billion of debt owed to private creditors.

View the complete PDF

Weekly Energy Update (April 23, 2020)

by Bill O’Grady, Thomas Wash, and Patrick Fearon-Hernandez, CFA

Given the remarkable events of the past week, we are adjusting the usual format of this report.  We[1] have been covering energy for over three decades and never imagined that we would see prices for actively traded futures fall into negative territory.

(Source: Barchart.com)

The sharp drop in prices was mostly due to forced selling by exchange-traded products (ETPs).[2]  As a reminder, there are no grantor trusts in oil, which would require the trust to hold actual barrels of oil; instead, oil ETPs usually create their products in the futures markets.  Although there are various methodologies in operation, they all work, to a greater or lesser degree, by rolling contracts in different oil futures months.  The most commonly used ETPs normally operate by holding the front month contract and, at some point near expiration, “rolling” into the next month.  This gives an approximate constant long position in crude oil.  The total return on these products come from three sources—the price of oil itself, the interest on margin,[3] and the “roll yield.”  If the calendar curve for oil prices is backward (that is, the nearby futures trade at a premium to the deferred contracts), there is a positive roll yield.  At each roll, under these conditions, the ETP will be purchasing a cheaper contract.  If nothing changes, the cheaper contract will rise in value and benefit the ETP holder.  The opposite condition, where the nearby futures trade at a discount to the deferred futures contracts, is known as contango.  That is the current situation in the oil market.  In this case, there would be a negative roll yield.  Contango usually occurs when there is too much prompt supply relative to demand.

There have been reports of strong inflows into oil ETPs.  Although we don’t have a breakdown by commodity, there has been a clear surge in flows.  The chart below shows ETF net issuance for commodity ETPs on a weekly basis.  The recent surge is notable and market commentary would suggest the lion’s share of these flows were likely into oil ETPs.

It is likely that retail investors viewed low oil prices as unsustainable and wanted to establish continual long positions for the eventual turn in prices.  If not for the roll yield, this would be a reasonable strategy.  But the roll yield under conditions of contango increases the cost of holding the position.

As the ETPs began the roll process, where they sold their long positions in the nearby futures and bought the next deferred contract, there was a large long position that needed to be liquidated.  Unfortunately, there was little place to put the oil as the ETP doesn’t take delivery of the commodity.  As of April 10, nearly 70% of storage at the Cushing, OK, delivery hub for the CME crude oil contract was utilized; it is likely that much of the rest of it was already leased.  The ETPs were forced to sell to buyers that required the long to “pay” them for taking the oil off their hands, leading to the historic negative price for crude oil.

Some will ask, “is this a real price?”  In one sense, no.  We won’t see less than free gasoline anytime soon.  The 2nd or 3rd next nearby futures contract is a better reflection of what is a normal price under current conditions.  On the other hand, back in our futures days,[4] we remember a squawk box conference where a futures analyst suggested a price of a commodity had become “artificial”…to which a broker responded, “the margin calls, sir, are quite real.”  There was damage to some investor accounts due to this debacle, to say nothing about participants in futures that made outsized gains and losses unexpectedly; imagine how it would be if a long equity position could see the stock price fall below zero.  I am not sure this will ever happen again, but the continued squeeze on storage means that at every expiration there is a chance that something like this could be repeated.[5]  If it does, the CME contract is in grave danger; we could see a shift to using Brent futures, which exhibited none of this behavior because it has wider storage options, including a cash settlement.  The broader issue is that oil fundamentals are abysmal and until supply contracts and demand expands, prices will remain under pressure.

Crude oil inventories rose 15.0 mb compared to the forecast rise of 14.0 mb.

In the details, U.S. crude oil production fell 0.1 mbpd to 12.2 mbpd.  Exports fell 0.5 mbpd, while imports declined 0.7 mbpd.  Refining activity fell 1.5%, a bit less than the 2.0% decline forecast.  The inventory build was mostly due to the continued collapse in refinery operations.

(Sources: DOE, CIM)

The above chart shows the annual seasonal pattern for crude oil inventories.  The last four weeks have pushed stockpiles almost “off the charts.”  Although not totally unexpected, the divergence in seasonal patterns could diverge in a bearish fashion in early June.

Based on our oil inventory/price model, fair value is $33.63; using the euro/price model, fair value is $44.77.  The combined model, a broader analysis of the oil price, generates a fair value of $38.70.  As we noted recently, the model output is less relevant as there is a non-linearity tied to the loss of storage capacity that cannot be fully captured with these models, which has been clearly exhibited over the past week.

As promised, here are a couple charts that look at U.S. oil demand.  The chart below shows the four-week average of gasoline supplied to the distribution system.  The combination of rising inventories and lower demand has pushed up the current days to cover to nearly 48 days; the average is 25 days.

Total fuel consumption is plunging.

This is a longer-term view of refinery activity.

The last time we saw a drop of this magnitude was during the depths of the Great Financial Crisis.  Over the past four weeks, refineries have reduced their oil consumption by 3.4 mbpd, far exceeding the drop of 0.6 mbpd in production.

So, now that oil prices have fallen precipitously, what happens now?  There is a good chance that prices stay low for a rather long time.  The market is building a major supply overhang that will take a long time to remove.  This supply problem is being exacerbated by collapsing demand caused by the policies to reduce the spread of COVID-19.  Thus, barring some event that reduces supply or boosts demand quickly, oil prices will likely languish at least into late summer.  What sort of events could support a recovery in prices?

A geopolitical event in the Middle East.  The potential for a disruption in oil flows is always possible.  Lately, Iran has become more aggressive in harassing shipping in the Persian Gulf.  The White House has warned Iran about this behavior.  We doubt Iran wants a full-scale conflict with the U.S., and we doubt the U.S. wants a war either.  There is the potential that both parties could stumble into a conflict, but it isn’t likely and would not be a reason to buy oil at this point.

Governments could absorb some of the overhang for strategic reserves.  Such purchases would make sense.  Oil prices are unusually cheap and buying emergency storage under such conditions is ideal.  Australia has announced a plan to buy oil and store it in the U.S. Strategic Petroleum Reserve (SPR).  It plans to purchase AUD 94.0 mm ($59 mm), roughly four million barrels of oil (at WTI $15 per barrel).  China has announced purchases as well, although the actual level of injections into strategic reserves is unknown.  The Trump administration has suggested SPR purchases but hasn’t been able to convince Congress to allocate funding.  By itself, these purchases would not probably spark a recovery, but the buying would help.

Governments could take more aggressive actions to reduce supply.  In addition to the government taking direct ownership stakes in oil companies to keep them afloat, there are reports that the administration is considering buying oil reserves from producers and simply not developing the purchased reserves, selling them at a later date when prices have recovered.  This action would give cash-strapped producers cash for those assets and, at the same time, reduce future supply.  There is no doubt energy-producing regions of the U.S. could use the relief.  However, this plan is fraught with risk.  It is not hard to imagine that a future administration could have a different policy on oil production and simply never sell or develop the purchased reserves.  At the same time, this policy could have the same issues as adding oil to the SPR; it works in the short run but fashioning a policy to sell the reserves or sell oil out of the SPR has never really been done.  Nevertheless, there is a chance that radical action may be taken.

Liquidate.  Deep recessions and depressions reveal who is a marginal producer and who has staying power.  Strong firms would likely prefer a wave of bankruptcies that would allow them to acquire assets cheaply.  The fact that there is opposition to support from the oil industry suggests this sentiment remains strong.  It would probably last until the strongest producers face bankruptcy; then support would be broadly welcomed.  To some extent, this is the other side of the aggressive government action.

Overall, we have probably seen the lows in oil prices.  It may be a few months before we see prices improve.  The key factor for recovery will be a significant recovery in economic activity, which will likely come by autumn.  Until then, prices will likely range in the teens into the summer.

In other news, the U.S. has ordered Chevron (84.44, +2.80) to halt operations in Venezuela by December and stop all production now.  Although we doubt this will help reduce supplies all that much, it will disappoint the company, which had held on in the country to try to benefit from if or when the Maduro government finally leaves.

View the PDF


[1] Of course, this is Bill “talking” in the royal sense.

[2] This term encompasses exchange-traded funds, exchange-traded notes and grantor trusts.

[3] Margin on June futures is $6,400 per contract.  There are 1k barrels per contract, and so, at $20 per barrel, the total value of a futures contract is $20k.  The ETP fully funds the contract but is only required to maintain the margin.  The rest is usually held in T-bills which generate some interest income.

[4] Again, Bill using the “imperial our.”

[5] BTW, if you were wondering if a retail client could buy and hold crude oil, here is a story about that.

Daily Comment (April 22, 2020)

by Bill O’Grady, Thomas Wash, and Patrick Fearon-Hernandez, CFA

[Posted: 9:30 AM EDT]

Today is Earth Day and also Lenin’s birthday.  But please don’t accuse us of implying a connection!  Rather, we’re focused today on the latest coronavirus news, including the Senate’s passage of new PPP funds, and signs that oil prices may be stabilizing.

COVID-19:  Official data show confirmed cases have risen to 2,585,468 worldwide, with 178,845 deaths and 695,324 recoveries.  In the United States, confirmed cases rose to 825,306, with 45,075 deaths and 75,673 recoveries.  Here is the chart of infections now being published by the Financial Times:

As shown in the graph, many major countries have passed the “bend in the curve” and are seeing slower case growth, but few are exhibiting sharp declines in the number of new infections.  In addition, many countries are now revising their past death counts upward as further investigation shows many people likely died from the virus without it being realized.

Real Economy

U.S. Policy Responses

International Policy Responses

Hong Kong:  Chief Executive Carrie Lam reshuffled her cabinet, naming new secretaries for technology, financial services, home affairs, mainland affairs and the civil service.  The move, which was approved (or initiated) by Beijing, is being interpreted as an effort to tighten control over city employees and relations with the Chinese government.

North Korea:  Despite press reports this week that North Korean leader Kim Jong Un was in critical condition after emergency heart surgery, South Korean officials say Kim appears to be proceeding with his normal schedule, and there is no sign that North Korean military forces are under the kind of alert that would be expected in a crisis.  U.S. officials admit they still have no confirmation on Kim’s condition.

View the complete PDF