Asset Allocation Quarterly (Third Quarter 2019)

  • We maintain our sanguine view of the economy and markets, though it is more guarded than last quarter.
  • We expect the Federal Reserve to implement easier policy in the third quarter, marking its first rate reduction since 2008.
  • In the absence of a recession, which is not in our forecast, the rate reduction should lead to a healthy environment for U.S. equities.
  • Although economic weakness abroad is forecast to persist in the near-term, such weakness will only modestly impact the U.S. economy.
  • The Fed’s accommodation and our expectations for continued, albeit muted, U.S. growth encourages our decision to maintain historically high allocations to U.S. equities in the strategies.

View the complete PDF

 

ECONOMIC VIEWPOINTS

Although several indicators show increased potential for a recession and several metrics have softened, our consensus forecast is that recession in the U.S. is not imminent, and the economic expansion, already in record territory,[1] may continue beyond our three-year forecast period. While some factors, such as the inverted yield curve, the two-year forward LIBOR rate lower than fed funds, and softening in the composite index of 10 leading indicators, have led to an increase in the probability of a recession, this rise is from a level that was close to zero several months ago. Our expectation is that the Fed will be successful in engineering a soft landing, or at least forestalling a recession. One of the principal arguments for our anticipation of continued, albeit muted, growth is the lack of excesses that exist in the economy. Credit creation, housing values, and equity valuations are certainly elevated relative to the depth of the Great Financial Crisis a little over 10 years ago, yet are far from being stretched. Moreover, the Fed retains some room for maneuvering that can assist in its efforts to maintain the expansion, inclusive of further rate cuts and curtailment of its balance sheet reduction.

Beyond the U.S., significant leadership and economic uncertainties remain unresolved for the balance of the year. These include the probability of a hard Brexit, Christine Lagarde’s ability to steer the European Central Bank, Italy’s flirtation with broaching the EU’s fiscal rules, the new German chancellor, the replacement of Mark Carney as governor of the Bank of England, the potential for a large reduction in the Bank of Japan’s quantitative easing, and the ability of the People’s Bank of China to continue stimulus measures. Though difficulties beyond our shores can impact the U.S. economy, as the global hegemon it is unlikely that a global slowdown, or even a recession in certain jurisdictions, would cause a recession in the U.S.

The U.S. economy continues to grow, albeit at a muted pace relative to its long-term average. Given the absence of overt inflationary pressures, the Fed is likely to lower the fed funds rate at its meeting in the third quarter, marking its first reduction since 2008. The elevated level of fed funds relative to the implied LIBOR rate, two years deferred, is supportive of a rate reduction as the Fed attempts to engineer a soft-landing in a fashion similar to 1997.


[1] Assuming this is confirmed by the National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.

STOCK MARKET OUTLOOK

In every instance following an initial reduction in the fed funds rate that was not accompanied by a recession, equity investors were rewarded. However, as the accompanying chart indicates, each business cycle has its own unique characteristics. Those cycles where the initial reduction in fed funds were concurrent with a recession are indicated by dots on the associated lines.

Our position is that the accommodative posture of the Fed will continue to propel the economy and risk-based assets through the end of this year and into next year’s election cycle. In addition, our estimates for S&P 500 earnings are $157.30 in 2019, increasing to $161.32 for 2020.[2] Obviously, a 2.5% increase is far from a cause for celebration, but it does represent an improvement from year-over-year declines recorded over the first half of 2019. Additionally, such growth corresponds with our consensus forecast for positive, though muted, GDP growth. Nevertheless, the potential for a policy mistake, intensifying trade impediments, or building inflationary pressures necessitate vigilance and the willingness to trim equity exposure should conditions warrant.

All risk assets within the strategies remain in the U.S. As noted in the Economic Viewpoints section on the previous page, we remain cautious on non-U.S. exposure over the near-term. Although relative valuations are promising, the range of uncertainties encourage our purely domestic exposure. Within investing styles, we maintain our neutral posture between value and growth. Among sectors, Industrials, Technology, and Materials continue to be overweight. While the allocations to equities remain at historically high levels in the strategies, with an overweight to lower capitalization stocks, we trimmed a portion of the small cap position in three of the strategies in favor of increasing the exposure to mid-caps in all strategies. The rationale for this change is due to our view that the latter stages of an economic cycle coupled with pronounced M&A activity is normally favorable for mid-cap stocks.


[2] Using Standard and Poor’s method of calculating operating earnings

BOND MARKET OUTLOOK

The prospect for an increasingly accommodative Fed going into the election season guides our view that the yield curve will return to its traditional slope over the course of the year, principally through a reduction in short-term rates. Through our full three-year forecast period, we are positive on longer term rates as long Treasuries have significantly attractive yields relative to those from other developed countries. Though we have some concerns regarding the nearly $5 trillion in corporate debt maturing before 2023, this concern is offset by the $12 trillion of bonds outstanding globally with negative yields, representing 24% of the global bond market. This fact supports the notion of an adequate appetite for the maturing investment grade corporate credits. In the speculative bond space, however, we expect spread widening over the full forecast period owing to a slower economy being less supportive of lesser rated bonds.

The duration of bond holdings in the strategies with income objectives has been extended slightly accruing from our forecast for an accommodative Fed, a slowing economy, lack of inflationary pressure, and global demand for bonds. We retain the laddered structure as a nucleus beyond the short-term segment in these strategies.

OTHER MARKETS

Although REITs have enjoyed outsized returns thus far this year, our forecast for rates combined with a lack of excesses in the commercial real estate segment leads to our sanguine view on REITs. Thus, the small exposure remains in the Income with Growth strategy due to the diversified income stream that REITs provide.

Gold is retained at a modest allocation given its ability to offer a hedge against geopolitical risks combined with the safe haven it can afford during an uncertain climate for the U.S. dollar.

View the complete PDF

Weekly Geopolitical Report – Russia’s Local Elections (July 15, 2019)

by Patrick Fearon-Hernandez, CFA

Although Russia hasn’t been in the Western news very much recently, there’s been plenty of action “under the radar” related to the country’s regional and municipal elections this fall. On September 8, governors will be elected in 16 of the country’s 85 regions, including the important city of St. Petersburg.  Legislative assemblies will also be elected in 14 regions, the capitol Moscow, and many other municipalities.  In this week’s report, we’ll review the Russian government’s security goals and show how domestic political security is one of its most important priorities.  We’ll also discuss the domestic political challenges faced by the government and how it is attempting to control the regional and local elections to ensure President Putin and his United Russia Party retain power.  As always, we’ll conclude with market ramifications.

Russia’s Traditional Security Goals
In recent years, we’ve explored Russia’s security concerns in detail (see our Weekly Geopolitical Report from February 8, 2016).  We’ve emphasized that Russian security concerns stem largely from the fact that the country has few natural defenses and is essentially landlocked.  Russia’s European territory is open to invasion through the northern European plain, as illustrated by the invasions of Napoleonic France and Nazi Germany.  Meanwhile, Russia’s primary outlets to the sea can be blocked with relative ease.  Such landlocked isolation, restrained foreign trade, and limited arable land have left Russia relatively insular and poor, with an economy focused on natural resources.

View the full report

Asset Allocation Weekly (July 12, 2019)

by Asset Allocation Committee

The recent testimony from Chair Powell to Congress made it quite clear that the U.S. central bank is likely to cut rates at the end of July.  For the equity markets, the key issue is whether the shift away from tightening to easing will be enough to avoid recession.  If the rate cut(s) in the coming months reduce the odds of recession, we could see the expansion continue and the Fed may have engineered a rare “soft landing.”  On the other hand, it is quite possible that monetary authorities have raised rates too much and have waited too long to ease policy; if so, then a recession may be unavoidable.

This chart shows two business cycle indicators, one from the New York FRB and the other from the Atlanta FRB.  The former predicts the business cycle a year ahead and is based on the yield curve; the latter is coincident and based on GDP.  We overlay the two, using the New York number as a warning and the Atlanta index as confirmation.  The New York number has crossed the 30 threshold, which has been a signal of recession in the past with no false positives.  And, even rate cuts haven’t prevented recession once the 30 threshold has been crossed.  At the same time, we have not seen confirming data in the national accounts (GDP) data.  Thus, recession may be in the cards, although the risk isn’t imminent; the downturn may still be two years away and it is possible it could be avoided.  After all, every cycle is unique.

This chart shows the dilemma for equity investors.  In this chart we examine the average total return for the S&P 500 on a yearly basis, with the data indexed to the first rate cut, a year in advance of the cut and two years subsequent.  The data shows that equities tend to perform very well if recession is avoided, roughly earning 20% in the first year after the cut and nearly 50% over two years.  However, if a recession occurs, declines in excess of 20% are possible.

Although the NY Fed’s indicator has a strong track record, each business cycle is different, and it is possible that a recession can be avoided.  This analysis does suggest caution, although most safety assets have performed very well already, thus it may be too soon to fully de-risk portfolios.  In the immediate term, however, there is little cause to exit the equity markets, but vigilance is clearly necessary.

View the PDF

Asset Allocation Weekly (July 5, 2019)

by Asset Allocation Committee

Although it’s not official,[1] it appears the current expansion has reached a new record.

(Source: NBER)

This chart shows expansions by months since 1850.  The current expansion just reached 121 months, exceeding the 1991-2001 expansion, which was previously the longest.

Part of the reason this expansion has lasted so long is because economic growth has been rather slow.

This chart shows the average GDP for expansions since 1960; we have also isolated the average contribution from the components of GDP.[2]  Not only has this expansion had the slowest average GDP growth, but two of the components, net exports and government, were negative contributors.  That had never happened over this time frame before.

Because the expansion was slow, the bottlenecks that often develop in a long expansion have not become evident in this cycle.  Inflation remains tame, with the overall PCE deflator below 2.5%.  In previous recessions this measure of inflation had exceeded 2.5%, which would tend to trigger policy tightening.

Recessions are usually triggered by either policy tightening or a geopolitical event.  The former tends to occur when policymakers are facing rising inflation.  With current inflation tame, excessive tightening would be a major mistake.   The potential for a geopolitical risk is elevated at this time but not high enough to suggest a significant defensive position.

So, until inflation rises or a geopolitical event occurs, there is no reason that the current expansion can’t last longer.  And, as long as the expansion continues, equities should continue to perform relatively well. 

View the PDF


[1] The National Bureau of Economic Research, a private body, is the official arbiter of business cycles.  When it dates the onset of recession, it is usually months after the downturn has occurred.  Thus, it is possible (but not likely) that the group could determine that a recession began before July.  We won’t know for certain that the current expansion is the longest until the next recession starts.

[2] We break out fixed investment to eliminate the impact of inventories.  The actual calculation is GDP = Consumption + Investment + Government + Net Exports.

Asset Allocation Weekly (June 28, 2019)

by Asset Allocation Committee

Gold prices have been strong recently, supported by perceptions of easing monetary policy and oblique statements from the White House hinting at supporting a weaker dollar.  Lower interest rates and dollar weakness are generally bullish for gold prices.

Our coincident gold price model suggests the recent rally is merely “catching up” from an undervalued condition.

This model uses the balance sheets of the Federal Reserve and the European Central Bank, the EUR/USD exchange rate, the fiscal account as a percentage of GDP and the real two-year Treasury yield.  The model has been suggesting that gold was undervalued for the past two years.  The recent rally has closed the gap; however, as the dollar weakens and the central banks return to expanding their balance sheets, the model’s forecast will rise and support gold prices.

On a longer term basis, the unscaled level of the deficit does tend to suggest a favorable environment for gold.

This chart shows the Congressional Budget Office’s level of the deficit (on an inverted scale) and forecast to 2025.  The body is suggesting the deficit will worsen in the coming years which has tended to be supportive for gold prices.  Interestingly enough, the mere level has the biggest effect on prices compared to scaling the fiscal account to GDP.  Most likely, the level is easier for gold buyers to understand.

With inflation low and Modern Monetary Theory becoming popular, the likelihood of rising deficits is elevated.  A position in gold is one way investors can position for a secular trend in rising deficits.

View the PDF

Business Cycle Report (June 26, 2019)

by Thomas Wash

The business cycle has a major impact on financial markets; recessions usually accompany bear markets in equities.  We have created this report to keep our readers apprised of the potential for recession, which we plan to update on a monthly basis.  Although it isn’t the final word on our views about recession, it is part of our process in signaling the potential for a downturn.

Economic data released for May suggests the economy remains strong but is showing some signs of weakness. Currently, our diffusion index shows that 10 out of 11 indicators are in expansion territory, with several indicators approaching warning territory. The index currently sits at +0.818.[1]

The chart above shows the Confluence Diffusion Index. It uses a three-month moving average of 11 leading indicators to track the state of the business cycle. The red line signals when the business cycle is headed toward a contraction, while the blue line signals when the business cycle is headed toward a recovery. On average, the diffusion index provides about seven months of lead time for a contraction and three months for a recovery. Continue reading for a more in-depth understanding of how the indicators are performing.

View the complete PDF


[1] The diffusion index looks slightly different from last month due to adjustments we made to the formula and revisions in certain data sets.

Weekly Geopolitical Report – The Mid-Year Geopolitical Outlook (June 24, 2019)

by Bill O’Grady

(Due to the Independence Day holiday and a short summer hiatus, the next report will be published July 15.)

As is our custom, we update our geopolitical outlook for the remainder of the year as the first half comes to a close.  This report is less a series of predictions as it is a list of potential geopolitical issues that we believe will dominate the international landscape for the rest of the year.  It is not designed to be exhaustive; instead, it focuses on the “big picture” conditions that we believe will affect policy and markets going forward.  They are listed in order of importance.

Issue #1: Deglobalization

Issue #2: Election Meddling

Issue #3: Iran

Issue #4: China

View the full report

Asset Allocation Weekly (June 21, 2019)

by Asset Allocation Committee

In 2017, we introduced an indicator of the basic health of the economy and added it to the many charts we monitor to gauge market conditions.  The indicator is constructed using commodity prices, initial claims and consumer confidence.  The thesis behind this indicator is that these three components should offer a simple and clear picture of the economy; in other words, rising initial claims coupled with falling commodity prices and consumer confidence is a warning that a downturn may be imminent.  The opposite condition should support further economic recovery.  In this report, we will update the indicator with May data.

This chart shows the results of the indicator and the S&P 500 since 1995.  The updated chart shows that the economy did slip late last year but has recovered in 2019.  We have placed vertical lines at certain points when the indicator fell below zero.  It works fairly well as a signal that equities are turning lower, but there is a lag.  In other words, by the time this indicator suggests the economy is in trouble, the recession is likely near or already underway and the equity markets have already begun their decline.

To make the indicator more sensitive, we took the 18-month change and put the signal threshold at -1.0.  This provides an earlier bearish signal and also eliminates the false positives that the zero threshold generates.  Notwithstanding, we will pay close attention when the 18-month change approaches zero as it did in January.

What does the indicator say now?  The economy has decelerated but is not yet at a point where investors should become defensive.  Breaking below the red line would be our signal to expect a broader downturn.  Most likely, we are going through a period similar to what we experienced in 2016.  If this is the case, and the economic data begins to improve, then equities should remain supported into H2.

View the PDF

Weekly Geopolitical Report – War with Iran? (June 17, 2019)

by Bill O’Grady

Over the past year, U.S. relations with Iran have deteriorated.  In May 2018, President Trump announced he would withdraw from the Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action (JCPOA), a multinational treaty that was designed to slow, but not eliminate, Iran’s nuclear development.  As part of exiting the JCPOA, the U.S. reapplied sanctions that have reduced Iran’s oil exports.  Since the U.S. has taken this action, the Iranian economy has suffered, with inflation rising to dangerous levels.

This chart shows the yearly change in Iran’s CPI.  We have placed a vertical line at the point where the U.S. pulled out of the JCPOA.  Note that inflation has jumped from a yearly increase of 10% to over 50%.

Sanctions have dramatically reduced Iran’s oil exports, shown on the following chart.  Before the U.S. withdrawal, Iran was exporting around 2.5 mbpd of crude oil.  That number has declined to 0.3 mbpd.

(Source: Bloomberg)

Iran has been threatening to retaliate in the face of a weakening economy.  In a previous report last year, we examined potential responses by Iran.  These included restarting the nuclear program, projecting power into the Middle East, closing the Strait of Hormuz, deploying a cyberattack, building a coalition against the U.S. and renegotiating the JCPOA.

Some of the actions that Iran might take could escalate into a hot war with the U.S.  In this report, we will begin with an examination of the geography and geopolitics of Iran.  Using this information, we will discuss what a war with Iran might look like.  We will also reflect on the very nature of war and alternatives to the use of military force within the context of Iran.  As always, we will conclude with market ramifications.

View the full report