Daily Comment (September 22, 2022)

by Patrick Fearon-Hernandez, CFA, and Thomas Wash

[Posted: 9:30 AM EDT] | PDF

Good morning and buckle up! Today’s Comment will focus exclusively on the central banks. We begin with a broad overview of the latest Federal Open Market Committee (FOMC) meeting followed by an assessment of the future path of policy hikes. Next, we cover the market reaction to the Fed’s rate decision and discuss implications for the global economy. Lastly, the report summarizes how central banks responded to the Federal Reserve’s rate announcement.

It Will Be Enough: The Federal Reserve raised its benchmark interest rate by 75 bps for the third meeting in a row and signaled that it has the tools necessary to corral inflation.

  • In a press conference, Fed Chair Jerome Powell reaffirmed that his position is unchanged since giving his Jackson Hole speech three weeks ago. He reiterated the central bank’s will to keep interest rates in restrictive territory until it sees compelling evidence that inflation is coming down. Although his comments were mostly hawkish, Powell signaled the Fed could slow the pace of increases at some point.
  • The Fed’s latest “dot plot” shows the implied year-end fed funds rate above 4.25%. Although Powell mentioned that no decision has been made on the size of the next hike, it is widely believed the Fed will raise rates 75 bps and 50 bps, respectively, at its next two meetings. The plot also shows that policymakers favor a mild hike of 50 bps for all of next year.

    • Although there were no dissenting votes in the Fed’s rate decision, the dot plot reveals that at least one Fed member on the committee was uncomfortable lifting the fed funds rate above 4.00%. We would guess the outlier was one of the new Fed governors, either Lisa Cook or Philip Jefferson. If that is the case, future hikes could face resistance, especially if the economy falls into recession.
  • The Fed’s economic projection showed that the U.S. economy could expand by only 0.2% in 2022. This tepid growth forecast suggests that central bank officials are possibly factoring in a recession later this year. Although the Fed does forecast more robust growth in 2023 and 2024, the sharp increases in the policy rate imply that the central bank does not plan to reverse course if economic growth slows.

The Markets React: Equities whipsawed, major currencies tanked, and long-duration bond prices surged as investors weighed the impact of higher interest rates on financial assets.

  • The central bank has been able to raise rates because the unemployment rate remains low, but policymakers will likely not be able to sustain this pace of hikes once the economy contracts. While Powell maintains the bank plans to keep rates high for as long as it takes to bring down inflation, the central bank could face political pressure as the economy weakens and labor markets soften. For example, hours after the rate announcement, Massachusetts Senator Elizabeth Warren (D-MA) slammed the Federal Reserve for its hawkish actions for not looking out for workers. Accordingly, the recent volatility is likely attributable to investors being unsure of whether the Fed will blink when confronted with poor economic data.
  • The U.S. dollar rallied against its peers following the Fed’s decision to raise rates. The euro fell further below parity, and the British pound dipped to its lowest level since 1985. The greenback’s strength will exaggerate inflation in other countries as most commodities are priced in dollars. Additionally, the currency’s strength encourages capital outflows, especially from emerging markets, as investors look to move away from risk assets into safe-haven assets. As a result, non-U.S. central banks will be forced to raise rates if they want to prevent their currencies from weakening, thus increasing the likelihood that the global economy will fall into recession.
  • The yield curve inversion deepened as recession fears led to a plunge in long-duration yields and a spike in short-end yields. Because financial institutions like to borrow in the short term and lend in the long term, an inverted yield curve can hurt bank profitability. Thus, financial institutions may be less inclined to issue loans to potential borrowers. As a result, the potential decline in lending activity will hinder investment spending and may be already negatively impacting the housing market.

    • The number of existing home sales plummeted as the Fed’s interest rate hikes pushed up mortgage rates to their highest level since 2008. In his speech, Powell mentioned that he expects the housing market to enter correction territory.

The World Strikes Back: Central banks are altering their monetary policy to prevent a stronger dollar from hurting their respective economies.

  • The Bank of Japan intervened in the foreign exchange market for the first time since 1998. The move was aimed at protecting the yen from depreciation, while the central bank maintained its ultra-accommodative monetary policy. The intervention pushed the dollar down 2% to around 140.2 against the yen. However, the BOJ’s action will provide limited relief for the currency as traders will still attempt to offload their yen holdings until the central bank backs away from its loose monetary policy.
  • In contrast to the BOJ, the Bank of England lifted its benchmark rate by 50 bps to 2.25%, its seventh consecutive rate hike. The bank’s actions were relatively modest compared to the hikes of 75 bps from the Federal Reserve and European Central Bank. The BOE’s moves are likely related to confidence that the U.K. government’s plan to cap energy bills will also lower inflation. Following the hike, the pound briefly rallied above $1.13 before settling back to its 1985 lows. Although the BOE was the first major central bank to raise interest rates, we suspect it could be the first bank to pause its policy tightening as the country battles recession.
    • PM Liz Truss’s new administration has advocated for pro-growth policies as she looks to jump-start the British economy. Thus, if the bank tightens policy too much and the economy contracts, the bank will likely be blamed. This dynamic should push the British pound closer to dollar parity over the next few months.
  • Several other central banks also tightened their policy to slow the rise in import prices. For example, the Swiss National Bank hiked interest rates by 75 bps, bringing the country out of negative territory for the first time since 2015. Meanwhile, the Philippines and Indonesia raised rates by 50 bps each, and Taiwan hiked interest rates by a modest 12.5 bps. Import goods, especially commodities, are primarily priced in dollars; thus, a surging greenback generally adds to inflationary pressures abroad. As a result, we suspect other central banks will continue to tighten policy until the Fed ends its hiking cycle.

View PDF

Weekly Energy Update (September 22, 2022)

by Bill O’Grady, Thomas Wash, and Patrick Fearon-Hernandez, CFA | PDF

Crude oil prices remain under pressure on recession fears.

(Source: Barchart.com)

Crude oil inventories rose 1.1 mb compared to a 1.9 mb build forecast.  The SPR declined 6.9 mb, meaning the net draw was 5.8 mb.

In the details, U.S. crude oil production was steady at 12.1 mbpd.  Exports were unchanged while imports rose 1.2 mbpd.  Refining activity rose 2.0% to 93.6% of capacity.

(Sources: DOE, CIM)

The above chart shows the seasonal pattern for crude oil inventories.  The rise in stockpiles over the past two weeks is contra-seasonal.  As the chart shows, we are nearing the seasonal trough in inventories.  The build seen in October into November is usually due to refinery maintenance.  With the SPR withdrawals continuing, the seasonal build could be exaggerated this year.

Since the SPR is being used, to some extent, as a buffer stock, we have constructed oil inventory charts incorporating both the SPR and commercial inventories.

Total stockpiles peaked in 2017 and are now at levels last seen in 2003.  Using total stocks since 2015, fair value is $106.98.

With so many crosscurrents in the oil markets, we are beginning to see some degree of normalization.  The inventory/EUR model suggests oil prices should be around $66 per barrel, so we are seeing about $20 of risk premium in the market.

The SPR

In our weekly reporting above, we have been updating total U.S. oil inventories, both commercial and the SPR.  For years, analysts have tended to treat the two as different entities as commercial inventories are what is available and the SPR was only deployed in emergencies.  Price modeling, therefore, tended to focus on commercial storage.  The separation of commercial and strategic stocks made sense.  However, as our above analysis suggests, we have stopped treating the SPR as an emergency reserve and have begun considering it a buffer stock.

Buffer stocks are sometimes used in commodity markets to dampen price volatility.  When prices rise to a level considered “too high,” the buffer stock manager releases inventory, and when prices are “too low” the commodity is purchased.  In the 1970s, several commodities had buffer stocks, which were managed by producers.  All of them eventually failed because producers set a price well above the market clearing one.  Eventually, the buffer stock became too large, and the manager was forced to “dump” the stocks on the market, leading to a price collapse.  A buffer stock operated by a consumer would likely have the opposite problem since it would want to set a price well below the market clearing one.

Recently, the Biden administration floated an idea that if WTI fell to $80 per barrel or less, the SPR would buy oil to refill it.  We still harbor doubts that oil will ever be purchased by this administration, but this recent “trial balloon” is intriguing.  If this idea becomes policy, it will confirm that the SPR has become a buffer stock and the government is comfortable with an $80 per barrel oil price.  That is probably a high enough price to maintain current output, but if prices remain steady, the inflationary impact (inflation is a rate of change concept) would diminish over time.  In theory, the $80 per barrel becomes a floor, and it is unclear what price would trigger selling (the ceiling price), although one could imagine that a round number like $100 per barrel would be reasonable.  There remain numerous uncertainties about this concept, but we will continue to monitor developments.

Here’s the key point to all this:  from the late 1970s until recently, there was great faith placed on markets to solve problems.  Government intervention into the economy was normalized during the Great Depression and WWII but the inflation of the 1970s undermined the idea that the government could manage the economy.  The infamous gas lines of the 1970s occurred, in part, due to price caps on product.  When it became unprofitable to refine gasoline at the cap price, shortages developed.  Markets do work, but they are focused on efficiency, not equality.  In other words, high gasoline prices did increase available supply and eased demand, but the burden of the policy fell more heavily on lower income households.  The government using the SPR as a buffer stock could suggest a return to the pre-Reagan/Thatcher era.

Market News:

  • We want to issue a correction to last week’s report; we implied that the permitting element of the Inflation Reduction Act had already been passed. It was not.  This part was peeled from the bill to be passed separately.  Talks on permitting are currently underway.
  • The government has accepted about $190 million of bids for offshore oil development.
  • The G-7 price cap idea remains untested, but the IEA notes that when the EU implements its embargo next February, Russian oil demand will fall by 1.9 mbpd.
  • As winter approaches, U.S. oil producers warn they will not be able to meet shortfalls as demand rises. Surging LNG exports are pushing U.S. electricity prices higher.
  • For reference, this site updates EU natural gas storage.
  • One of the factors that has cooled oil prices has been weaker Chinese economic growth. If Beijing becomes serious about stimulating the economy, oil prices will likely rise.
  • Over the past several months, we have noted that the data for miles driven by Americans shows a clear reaction to higher gasoline prices. For years, it was a “truism” that driving demand was price insensitive.  However, work from home and the expansion of social media appear to have caused gasoline consumption to become more sensitive to price.
  • As energy prices rise in the EU, manufacturing firms are being forced to curtail production.
  • Smaller U.S. oil firms have been aggressively expanding oil and gas production, but reports suggest that they have exhausted their most promising fields, which may lead to falling output.
  • As energy prices rise in Europe, governments are trying to address this issue. There are two policy paths.  The first is to increase supply, and although that is the preferred solution, it is hard to execute in the short run because it often takes investment and time to lift production.  The other path is to ease the negative impact on consumers by either fixing the price and then allocating the “pain” to either producers or the government, or by subsidizing consumers.  The problem is, once this path has been taken, it becomes a political decision about who will bear the cost.  The U.K. is a good example of what not to do as the support program is likely too broad, offers too much support, and will be funded by government borrowing.  The steady decline in the GBP is evidence that the markets, to quote Queen Victoria, “are not amused.”
  • The lack of investment in oil and gas production is a key element to the recent rise in prices. A good example of this lack of investment is Nigeria, where oil production is  about 1.2 mbpd, down from 2.6 mbpd in 2012.  Economic mismanagement and corruption have weakened the incentives to investment, and since oil and gas are depleting assets, the lack of investment means falling output.  This investment issue isn’t just a Nigerian problem as OPEC+ now speaks of “production targets” as opposed to “production quotas,” reflecting the lack of productive capacity.
  • The recent heatwave in China has spurred coal demand and has lifted imports of coal from Russia and Indonesia.
  • As we head into another “La Niña” season, Japan is bracing for a cold winter. If the temperatures stay true to form, it will lift LNG demand.

 Geopolitical news:

 Alternative energy/policy news:

  • There is an old adage in commodities that “nothing cures high prices like high prices.” The idea is that high prices lead consumers to reduce demand and suppliers to boost output.  In the current high-price environment, most of the adjustment has come from consumers.  However, one area often overlooked is increasing efficiency.  A recent report indicated that data centers, server farms that do the calculating that fosters AI and the internet, tend to generate massive levels of heat that is usually vented.  However, with prices for energy high, there are efforts to capture this energy and use it for the production of steam.
  • As EVs expand, lithium, a key mineral in batteries, is in high demand. It tends to be found from two sources:  ‘hard rock’ mining and evaporating brine at high altitudes from waters containing lithium.  The latter source is mostly found in South America, primarily Chile.  The former source is distributed around the world, with several mining sites in Canada.  A major, yet undeveloped, mine exists in Quebec.  Despite high demand and high prices, the mine remains uncompleted due to various obstacles.
  • Hertz (HTZ, $18.15) announced plans to purchase 175,000 EVs from General Motors (GM, $39.17) over the next five years.
  • Modular nuclear reactors hold the promise of expanding nuclear power quickly to less populated regions. Despite their promise, industry expansion has been slow.  There are several reasons.  First, most of the research and development of these reactors are still in the concept and design phases.  This situation is still favorable, because is suggests this product will become increasingly available.  But for now, electricity from small modular nuclear reactors remains in the future.  Second, connecting to the grid remains an issue in some markets.  One possibility would be to site these reactors where current coal-fired plants reside, allowing for rapid connectivity.  And finally, even with modularity, nuclear power remains controversial, which tends to slow development.
  • Although key metals for clean energy are found in various places around the world, processing is concentrated in China.

  View PDF

Daily Comment (September 21, 2022)

by Patrick Fearon-Hernandez, CFA, and Thomas Wash

[Posted: 9:30 AM EDT] | PDF

Our Comment today opens with an update on the Russia-Ukraine war, in which Russia has announced a mobilization of its reserves and has made new threats to use nuclear weapons.  We next review a wide range of other international and U.S. developments with the potential to affect the financial markets today, including an overview of today’s interest-rate decision by the Federal Reserve.

Russia-Ukraine:  As Ukrainian forces continue to press their counteroffensives in their northeastern region around Kharkiv and in their southern region around Kherson, ethnic-Russian separatists in occupied areas yesterday announced they will hold referendums on annexing themselves to Russia.  The sham referendums are likely aimed at strengthening President Putin’s narrative that the war is all about “liberating” Ukraine and bringing the ethnic Russians there under Moscow’s protection.  After such a sop to Russian nationalism, Putin may hope to encourage more Russian men to volunteer for the war.  Indeed, in a speech defining the war as an existential struggle for Russia’s survival against what he described as a hostile West, Putin today announced a “partial mobilization” of Russia’s reserve forces.  Defense Minister Shoigu later said that the mobilization would eventually provide about 300,000 fresh troops for the armed forces, although he emphasized that the measure would not involve mass conscription.  Finally, in a further reflection of Russia’s continued manpower shortcomings, the Duma yesterday rushed into place a new law that dramatically increases penalties for desertion, refusing conscription orders, and insubordination. It also criminalizes voluntary surrender and makes surrender a crime punishable by ten years in prison.

  • Russia’s mobilization of reserves is unlikely to have much impact on the war in the near term, since the country’s wartime losses to date have depleted many of the officers, weapons, and supplies needed to train and equip any new troops. The mobilization, coupled with a new Russian threat to use nuclear weapons, is probably mostly geared toward intimidating the West and showing Chinese President Xi, Putin’s key patron, that Russia can turn the war around.  Another reassuring sign is Shoigu’s assurance that there would be no mass conscription, which suggests the government still fears the political consequences of a true mass mobilization.
  • As a reminder, government readouts from their summit last week suggest that Xi raised tough questions for Putin regarding the war. However, it’s unclear whether the message was that the Russians need to stop fighting with one hand tied behind their backs, or that they need to start winding down the war.
    • Putin’s mobilization and the new nuclear threat today could signal that the message was the former. In that case, Russia could now throw its full weight into the war and create much more risk for global geopolitics and the global economy.
    • However, since the Chinese readout didn’t mention Ukraine, and since Indian Prime Minister Modi explicitly questioned the wisdom of the war, it may be that Putin’s most important patrons and enablers are telling him to look for a way out. In that case, Putin’s latest move could merely be a last gasp before starting to search for an eventual wind-down of the war, perhaps by simply settling for a Russian annexation of Ukraine’s Luhansk, Donetsk, and other occupied regions.

European Union-China:  The European Union Chamber of Commerce in China issued a report saying EU companies are being forced to “reduce, localize, and silo” operations in China because of President Xi’s regulatory crackdowns on previously booming industries and his draconian Zero-COVID policies.

  • The bleak report also warns that because of those and other problems, China is losing its attractiveness as an investment destination.
  • The report is consistent with our view that the world is fracturing and regionalizing, with countries breaking up into relatively separate geopolitical and economic blocs. The result is likely to be less efficient production, higher costs, higher inflation, and lower profits.

European Union-United States:  In another example of how many key countries allied to the U.S. are coalescing into a U.S.-led bloc, companies in Europe that make steel, fertilizer, and other feedstocks of economic activity are shifting operations to the U.S., attracted by more stable energy prices and muscular government support.  The trend is likely positive for U.S. investment and employment going forward.

Germany:  The federal government announced it will nationalize the country’s largest electric utility Uniper (UNPRF, 4.27), after it was pushed to the brink of insolvency by Russia’s cutoff of energy supplies and soaring prices for natural gas.  The move is a fine example of how war and crises can lead to long-lasting increases in government power over the economy.

  • The German government, which had already planned to take a 30% stake, will now completely buy out Uniper’s previous owner for €480 million.
  • Berlin will also take on a €7.5 billion credit line from the previous owner.
  • Finally, the government will recapitalize the struggling utility with €8 billion. That move comes on top of a €13 billion government credit line that the government already provided to Uniper earlier this year.

United Kingdom:  To help its businesses weather surging energy prices touched off by the war in Ukraine, yesterday the government said it will cut the wholesale price of energy for businesses and public organizations by more than half this winter.

South Korea:  Even though the country’s currency is depreciating rapidly and is now at its lowest level against the dollar since 2009, the Bank of Korea has denied government suggestions that it will announce a currency swap arrangement with the Fed this week.  At 1,394.90 per dollar, the won is currently down 15.1% against the dollar so far this year, worse than any other major Asian currency except the Japanese yen.

Haiti:  In yet another sign of how high global prices for food, energy, and other commodities are feeding political unrest in developing countries, a government plan to cut fuel subsidies has sparked large protests throughout Haiti.  Demonstrators across the country are calling on Prime Minister Ariel Henry to resign, saying he failed to address a spiraling economic and security crisis that has destabilized the Western Hemisphere’s poorest country.

U.S. Monetary Policy:  Today, Fed officials will wrap up their latest two-day policy meeting, with their interest-rate decision and updated economic projections due out at 2:00 pm ET.  Investors are broadly expecting that the officials will again hike their benchmark fed funds interest rate by an aggressive 75 bps.  We’ll also be watching with keen interest to see what their new economic and interest-rate forecasts say about the path of monetary policy going forward.

  • As we mentioned yesterday, there has been some whispering among observers that the rate hike could be a full percentage point as the officials try to re-establish their inflation-fighting credibility amid continuing fast price hikes.
  • Investors in late summer seemed too complacent about the Fed’s rate-hiking program. While many investors thought the policymakers would quickly pivot to steady or falling rates, we think there is a high chance they will keep hiking and spark a recession.  Indeed, market indicators suggest investors are currently coming around to that view, not just for the Fed, but also for other major central banks.  The prospect for unexpectedly high interest rates will likely continue to challenge stocks, bonds, commodities, and foreign currencies in the near term.

Hurricane Fiona:  After battering Puerto Rico earlier this week, Hurricane Fiona has now strengthened to a Category 4 storm and is moving north-northwest through the Caribbean Sea.  The hurricane is expected to slam into Bermuda later this week.

View PDF

Daily Comment (September 20, 2022)

by Patrick Fearon-Hernandez, CFA, and Thomas Wash

[Posted: 9:30 AM EDT] | PDF

Our Comment today opens with an update on the Russia-Ukraine war, including a near miss yesterday when a Russian missile almost struck a Ukrainian nuclear power plant.  We next review a wide range of other international and U.S. developments with the potential to affect the financial markets today, including a preview of the Federal Reserve’s latest policymaking meeting which begins today.

Russia-Ukraine:  Ukrainian forces continue to consolidate and extend their gains in the northeastern region around Kharkiv and the southern area of operations near Kherson.  Although the gains have slowed since last week, Russian nationalist bloggers and influencers seem to be panicking to the point where they are urging the government to annex the ethnic-Russian provinces of Luhansk and Donetsk, despite the fact that Russian forces only control a portion of those two regions.

European Union:  In what could be a major political development for Europe, EU affairs ministers from across the bloc are meeting today in Brussels to discuss ways to scrap or limit the unanimity rule for foreign affairs.  Under that rule, any one EU country has a veto over the bloc’s foreign affairs initiatives, such as Hungary’s recent veto of tighter sanctions on Russia.

  • Officials from major countries such as Germany and France believe the move can be accomplished via current treaty provisions, which allow shifting from unanimity to “qualified voting” in certain circumstances.
  • If that isn’t possible, the move would likely require a change in EU treaties, which would be highly unlikely in the near term.

 Sweden:  The Riksbank today hiked its benchmark short-term interest rate by a whopping 1.0%, marking its biggest rate rise in three decades and lifting the rate to 1.75%.  As with other major central banks, the Riksbank is belatedly fighting to get control over a surge in consumer prices.  Sweden’s August consumer price index was up 9.8% year-over-year.

Iran:  Anti-government riots have broken out across the country in response to the death of a young woman in police custody who had been arrested for not wearing a headscarf as prescribed by the country’s “morality police.”  The government is cracking down hard on the protests, but the situation reveals increased unhappiness with Iran’s religious leaders and potential political instability in one of the world’s key oil producers.

China-Ecuador:  Yesterday, the government of Ecuador said it had secured a deal in which China Development Bank and the Export-Import Bank of China (Eximbank) will provide debt relief worth $1.4 billion and $1.8 billion, respectively. Consistent with China’s reluctance to write down any principal on its problem loans, the deals will extend the loans’ maturity, reduce interest rates, and slow amortization.

  • The deal will allow Ecuador to keep up public spending in order to diffuse recent public protests over rising food and fuel prices.
  • The deal also demonstrates how Ecuador has become a Chinese toehold in South America. Not only has it provided major financial assistance to Ecuador, which alone would boost its influence, but it is also negotiating a free-trade deal with the country that could be finalized as early as December.

Brazil:  Ahead of the first round of presidential elections on October 2, supporters of conservative President Bolsonaro have murdered at least two prominent supporters of leftist Former President Lula da Silva, the frontrunner.  The Lula campaign has also been hit with bombings and other political violence.  The incidents raise concerns about broader clashes as the election nears, or if President Bolsonaro refuses to accept the results of the election.  Naturally, such destabilization would be negative for Brazilian equities.

Mexico:  An earthquake registering at least 7.6 on the Richter scale hit the southwestern state of Michoacán yesterday, killing at least one person and damaging several buildings.  So far, the quake doesn’t appear to have caused any significant damage to the country’s economy or financial markets.

United States-United Kingdom:  In an interview on her way to the United Nations General Assembly, British Prime Minister Truss admitted that a U.S.-U.K. free trade deal is not in the cards anytime soon.  The admission belies Brexit supporters’ insistence that a major benefit of the U.K. leaving the EU would the opportunity to strike a major deal with the U.S.  Without such a deal, Brexit will leave the U.K. with a much more difficult trade relationship with the EU, adding to the U.K.’s economic problems and probably weighing on its financial markets.

U.S. Monetary Policy:  Today, Fed officials begin their latest two-day policy meeting, with their interest-rate decision and updated economic projections due out on Wednesday afternoon.  Investors are broadly expecting that the officials will again hike their benchmark fed funds interest rate by an aggressive 75 bps.

  • However, there has been some whispering among observers that the rate hike could be a full percentage point as the officials try to re-establish their inflation-fighting credibility amid continuing fast price hikes.
  • As we have been warning, investors in late summer seemed too complacent about the Fed’s rate-hiking program. While many investors thought the policymakers would quickly pivot to steady or falling rates, we think there is a high chance they will keep hiking and spark a recession.  Indeed, market indicators suggest investors are currently coming around to that view, not just for the Fed, but also for other major central banks (see chart below).  The prospect for unexpectedly high interest rates will likely continue to challenge stocks, bonds, commodities, and foreign currencies in the near term.

U.S. Labor Market:  Even though a major railroad strike was narrowly averted last week, workers emboldened by the tight labor market continue to make tough wage and benefit demands across industries.  It now appears that contract talks for 22,000 port workers on the West Coast have started to stall, raising the risk of a strike that would further impede international trade and snarl global supply chains.  Some isolated work stoppages have already occurred.

  • The increase in labor action is likely boosting wage, salary, and benefit costs in a number of industries.

Those cost increases will probably exacerbate inflation, encourage the Fed to hike interest rates further, and weigh on corporate profits.  Any way you cut it, the increased labor activism is a threat to stock values going forward.

View PDF

Daily Comment (September 19, 2022)

by Patrick Fearon-Hernandez, CFA, and Thomas Wash

[Posted: 9:30 AM EDT] | PDF

Our Comment today opens with an update on the Russia-Ukraine war, where the Ukrainians continue to make progress in their key counteroffensives.  We next review a wide range of other international and U.S. developments with the potential to affect the financial markets today, including a preview of this week’s Federal Reserve policy meeting and how it’s affecting the financial markets so far this morning.

Russia-Ukraine:  Ukrainian forces continue to press their counteroffensives both in the country’s northeast near the city of Kharkiv and in the south around the Russian-occupied city of Kherson.  The northeastern attacks have slowed somewhat as the Ukrainians focus on consolidating last week’s gains, although the Ukrainian military says it now controls the key eastern bank of the Oskil River.  The bulk of the Ukrainian effort now appears to be on the Kherson axis.  Meanwhile, Russian forces continue to cede ground and are struggling to establish new defensive lines, at least in part because they are mostly left with poorly trained, poorly motivated volunteers, and other irregular troops.  The Russians are progressively turning to rocket and missile attacks on Ukraine’s civilian energy and other infrastructure in an effort to break the Ukrainians’ will to fight.

  • On the economic front, Russia’s effort to undermine the West’s will to support Ukraine by shutting off energy supplies is increasingly looking like it’s blowing back on Russia itself. The strategy will undoubtedly cause economic pain in Western Europe this winter but falling global prices and reduced exports have sharply curtailed the Russian government’s revenues.  As Western European countries quickly build infrastructure to import energy from the U.S. and elsewhere, Russia’s strategy will have even less impact on Western Europe while leading to ever-increasing budget deficits at home.
  • Meanwhile, we continue to assess Russian President Putin’s meetings with Chinese President Xi and Indian Prime Minister Modi last week. The press read-outs from those meetings suggest China and India have stepped back from their support for Russia, whether it be tacit or otherwise.  A key question is whether Putin will respond by doubling down on his Ukrainian attacks in an effort to win the war quickly, or whether he will start looking for an excuse to start winding down the effort.
  • Of course, another key consideration for Putin is that Russia’s recent failures in the war have prompted increased criticism of his government, and, by implication, himself.

Global Diplomacy:  Queen Elizabeth II’s funeral was held today in Westminster Abbey, with leaders from dozens of major countries in attendance.  With all those leaders rubbing shoulders, it would be no surprise if we see lots of market-impacting diplomatic news from the gathering.  Remarkably, many of those leaders will then head off to New York for this week’s opening of the United Nations General Assembly, so there will actually be several days of major diplomacy to wade through.

European Union:  Today, the European Commission proposed new legislation that would give it the power to force member states to stockpile key products and break contracts during a crisis such as the war in Ukraine or the coronavirus pandemic.

  • The proposed law would give the Commission ample space to declare an emergency. It would then be able trigger a number of interventionist measures to ensure the availability of goods, for example, by facilitating the expansion or repurposing of production lines.
  • The proposal is an example of how geopolitical frictions, war, and other crises often strengthen the state over the private sector.

European Union-Hungary:  The European Commission yesterday proposed freezing about €7.5 billion of EU “cohesion funds” earmarked for Hungary over corruption concerns, although it also opened the door for a compromise under which Hungary could get the cash if it addresses its corruption issues.  The move is the latest in the EU’s long-running battle with Hungary, which has chafed at many EU regulations and policies, including the EU’s support for Ukraine in its war with Russia.

Taiwan:  An earthquake measuring 6.8 on the Richter scale struck southeastern Taiwan and reverberated across the island yesterday, causing building damage, derailing a train, and triggering concerns of a tsunami.  As of this writing, however, there have been no reports of damage at the country’s globally-critical semiconductor production facilities.

United States-Taiwan-China:  In an interview yesterday, President Biden again said the U.S. would defend Taiwan “if in fact there was an unprecedented attack” on the island by China.  That marks at least the third time Biden has made the commitment, which suggests he has decided to deliberately shift the U.S. away from its previous “strategic ambiguity” policy toward the island.

  • Under that policy, the U.S. left its commitment to the island unclear, both to discourage any Taiwanese independence moves and to deter China from getting too aggressive with the island.
  • The administration’s decision to explicitly commit to a defense of Taiwan likely reflects concerns about China’s growing military strength and aggressiveness. The new U.S. commitment hasn’t been expressed formally, but it does suggest a tougher approach that will likely help keep U.S.-China tensions high and create more headwinds for Chinese stocks.

U.S. Monetary Policy:  Tomorrow, Fed officials begin their latest two-day policy meeting, with their decision due out on Wednesday afternoon.  Investors are broadly expecting that the officials will again hike their benchmark fed funds interest rate by an aggressive 75 bps.

  • However, there has been some whispering among observers that the rate hike could be a full percentage point as the officials try to re-establish their inflation-fighting credibility amid continuing fast price hikes.
  • As we have been warning, investors in late summer seemed too complacent about the Fed’s rate-hiking program. While many investors thought the policymakers would quickly pivot to steady or falling rates, we think there is a high chance they will over-shoot and spark a recession.  As more investors buy into our view, we are noting meaningful drops in the values of stocks, bonds, commodities, and foreign currencies so far today.

U.S. Petroleum Industry:  New reports indicate smaller private oil companies that helped boost the country’s oil output over the last couple of years have now begun to deplete their fracking opportunities and are starting to pull back from the market.  With publicly-traded companies still held under a tight leash by investors demanding capital discipline, that raises the prospect of further tightness in supply that could again give a boost to prices, and inflation, going forward.

  • Separately, the continued rise in natural gas prices prompted by the war in Ukraine and supply shortages is pushing up electricity prices in the U.S.
  • The rise in gas and electricity prices threatens to impose big costs on households as autumn turns to winter and heating demand rises.

Hurricane Fiona:  Over the weekend, Hurricane Fiona slammed into Puerto Rico, knocking out electricity for the entire island at times.  The island’s power company warned that fully restoring electricity service could take several days.

View PDF

Asset Allocation Bi-Weekly – The Federal Reserve’s Big Policy Mistake (September 19, 2022)

by the Asset Allocation Committee | PDF

If you look at how stocks and other risk assets have lost value since Fed Chair Powell’s short, hawkish speech at Jackson Hole last month, it’s clear he has succeeded in resetting expectations for monetary policy.  Investors now seem to accept that the Fed plans to hike interest rates much higher and then hold them there until consumer price inflation falls sharply.  The drop in risk assets suggests investors now realize that monetary policymakers are willing to push the economy into recession if needed to re-establish their credentials as inflation fighters.  That’s a huge change in sentiment.  But has the change gone far enough?  Multiple signs suggest investors expect any impending recession to be mild.  For example, the S&P 500 price index is currently down just 19.2% from its most recent record high in early January versus a median decline of approximately 25% during recessions over the last few decades.

We are skeptical that the Fed can keep any impending slowdown mild, for several reasons.  One key reason is that the Fed now has much weaker control over financial conditions than it did in the past.  In the chart below, we show that the Chicago FRB’s broad measure of U.S. financial conditions had a very tight correlation with the Fed’s benchmark fed funds interest rate only up to about 1998.  Since then, financial conditions have had almost no relation to the fed funds rate.  At most, the chart suggests the Fed needs to keep hiking rates for a long time before financial conditions tighten, as in the years leading up to the housing crisis of 2007-2008.  And even then, when financial conditions tighten, they do so quickly and dramatically.  Why is that?

It’s hard to pinpoint exactly why the Fed’s interest rate policy lost its impact on financial conditions in the late 1990s, but one plausible explanation is that the U.S. economy by then had become “money market driven” and was no longer “bank driven.”  By the late 1990s and ever since, those in need of capital and those holding excess capital (including international entities) have increasingly found each other via efficient, impersonal trading markets.  Rather than borrowing from banks, sophisticated corporate or municipal borrowers now issue bonds directly to investors.  Individuals borrow from both banks and specialized mortgage companies, both of which often package those loans into securities and sell them to third-party investors.  Finally, any holder of high-quality assets like U.S. Treasury bills can pledge them in return for a loan via the “repo” market.  The capital flows involved in these market transactions amount to trillions of dollars, and neither the banks nor the Fed has much control over them.

The problem is that Chair Powell and the other Fed policymakers may not understand or accept that in this new, internationalized money market-driven environment, the Fed may be better positioned to manage the economy by setting guardrails on the value of market-traded financial instruments like bonds and repos.  The fed funds rate may no longer be the right tool to achieve the Fed’s goals of stable consumer prices and full employment.  In fact, the Fed’s current aggressive rate hikes implicitly show this.  In the chart below, we can see that the Fed’s current rate hikes have broken a 20-year tradition in which policymakers cut rates or refrained from hiking them when the VIX gauge of stock volatility was greater than 20.  The Fed is now hiking rates despite the VIX being well above 20, just as it did in its bubble-popping mode during the late 1990s.

We all know how dangerous it is to try slicing an apple with a dull knife: you add more and more pressure until, suddenly, the blade crashes through and takes off the tip of your thumb.  The fed funds rate is now a very dull knife, and Fed policymakers will likely have to press it much harder than people expect before it substantially tightens financial conditions and cuts inflation pressure.  The danger is that the accumulation of rate hikes will suddenly gain traction and slide through the economy.  Looking forward, the Fed may realize that a better policy tool now may be something like its emergency asset backstopping programs early in the coronavirus pandemic.  With those programs, the Fed promised to buy a wide range of assets ranging from Treasuries and commercial paper to municipal bonds, if needed, to ensure their tradability, but the programs were so successful in calming the markets that they were little used.  For the time being, however, Fed policymakers are still wedded to their old-school, dull-bladed fed funds rate and will likely keep ratcheting it up until it finally sparks a more substantial recession.

View PDF

Daily Comment (September 16, 2022)

by Patrick Fearon-Hernandez, CFA, and Thomas Wash

[Posted: 9:30 AM EDT] | PDF

Good morning! Today’s Comment begins with an update on the conflict in Ukraine, which includes a discussion about China and Russia’s relationship. Next, we review the dollar’s impact on the global economy. We conclude the report with an overview of U.S. efforts to adapt to a changing geopolitical landscape.

Ukraine Updates: The war shows no signs of ending soon, but Ukraine’s odds of retaking lost territory have drastically increased.

  • The UN’s nuclear watchdog urged Moscow to remove its forces from the Zaporizhzhia Power Plant to avoid a potential catastrophe. Russian troops took over the area early in the war and used the region to launch attacks against Ukrainian forces. The call from the regulators for Russia to depart the site reflects the clear and present danger the conflict is having on the region. The plant’s strategic importance suggests that it is unlikely that the Russians will leave the area. Thus, the possibility of a nuclear disaster is elevated.
  • Russian President Vladimir Putin admitted that China has concerns about the ongoing war in Ukraine. The rare acknowledgment of the two countries’ differences likely signals that Russia does not feel as if it has Beijing’s full support. If correct, this could potentially force Putin to take more decisive action in Ukraine to prevent further losses in the conflict. History shows that Russian leadership does not survive after the country loses a war. Therefore, we expect Putin to take more extreme action to change the tide of the conflict.
  • Ukraine’s recent success in its war efforts has encouraged the West to provide the country with more military support. President Biden announced that the U.S. would provide Ukraine with $600 million in additional weaponry, while Germany said it would send two more rocket launchers and 50 armored vehicles. The increase in Western military aid shows that the war is far from over. As a result, Europe will likely not be able to avoid an energy-supply crunch in the winter.
    • In a related story, Germany seized refineries owned by Russian oil giant Rosneft as Berlin looks to take over its energy sector. The move is designed to prevent disruptions in German energy supply as the country weans itself from Russian gas. In addition to taking over Rosneft, the country plans to take over Uniper (UNPRF, $4.03) and two other gas importers.

Dollar takes off: The greenback’s rise against global currencies will prevent central banks from providing policy stimulus even as economies slow.

  • The yuan surpassed 7 per dollar for the first time since 2020. This sharp decline in the yuan was driven by the deceleration in GDP growth and the rise of the U.S. dollar against global currencies. Although the depreciation of the yuan has typically led to a surge in capital flight to safer currencies, new regulation prevents this from happening. The decline in the yuan could prevent the People’s Bank of China from easing monetary policy while also pushing up the cost of imports. As a result, the depreciation of the yuan will likely add to a long list of economic woes in China, which already include COVID lockdowns, consumer pessimism, and slowing exports.
  • Today, concerns over the U.K. economy have pushed the pound to its lowest level since 1985. The British currency fell to $1.137 after weak retail sales signaled a slowdown in consumer spending. In addition to the sales numbers, investor expectations of a jumbo rate hike from the Fed also weighed on the sterling. The currency’s depreciation will force the Bank of England to continue tightening, possibly even if the economy contracts. Hence, the currency’s weakness could trigger a long and deep recession.
  • The U.S. Dollar Index, which tracks the greenback’s strength relative to global currencies, is up 14.5% year-to-date. For comparison, Energy is the only stock market sector with better performance. As a result, the dollar’s rise has pushed up import prices, making global inflation worse. This trend will likely continue as long as the Federal Reserve continues its currency policy path.

Geopolitical Shifts: The U.S. is adjusting to changes in the geopolitical landscape.

  • S. policymakers cannot agree on whether they want to send military aid to Taiwan. The new legislation, the Taiwan Policy Act, is criticized for being too provocative toward China. The bill would grant the sovereign island $4.5 billion in aid over four years and includes extensive language on sanctions toward Beijing if it were to become more hostile toward the region. As we have mentioned in previous reports, there are many political benefits to getting tough with Beijing. A recent poll showed that 82% of Americans hold an unfavorable opinion toward China. This bravado could backfire at some point if China retaliates, but it is unlikely that Beijing will take aggressive actions before its National Party Congress on October 16. However, this will likely not be the case once the summit is over. Further provocation from the U.S. might lead to a direct conflict with China.
    • China has imposed sanctions on U.S. defense companies for selling arms to Taiwan. The measure is another example of Beijing’s sensitivity to the One China Policy in Taiwan.
  • S. Secretary Tony Blinken has assumed a crucial role in ending military clashes between Armenia and Azerbaijan. The two sides began fighting on Tuesday over disputed territory. A previous cease-fire brokered by Moscow earlier this year failed as Russia was distracted by its invasion of Ukraine. The U.S. involvement in ending the conflict is a possible sign that Washington would like to fill the void left by Russia.

View PDF

Daily Comment (September 15, 2022)

by Patrick Fearon-Hernandez, CFA, and Thomas Wash

[Posted: 9:30 AM EDT] | PDF

Good morning! Today’s Comment begins with an overview of the implications of a more aggressive Federal Reserve. Next, we discuss the latest developments in the EU and U.S. fight against inflation, which includes an update on rail worker negotiations. The report concludes with a discussion on how sanctions are affecting Russia’s relationships with its allies.

Go Big or Go Home: Higher than expected inflation numbers have added to speculation that the Federal Reserve could be more aggressive in its tightening cycle. However, this does not mean it won’t cut rates.

  • The market expects the Federal Reserve to go big at its next meeting. The CME FedWatch Tool shows that the Federal Reserve will raise rates by at least 75 bps in September and potentially push its benchmark policy rate up 100 bps. This change in the policy-rate forecast was related to disappointing CPI and PPI reports. In August core CPI accelerated unexpectedly, while core PPI failed to drop as much as the market anticipated. Higher fed funds expectations could lead to a choppy market over the next few days as the FOMC meeting approaches.
  • The Fed’s next rate hike will be historic even if it raises the policy rate by only 25 bps. This next rate decision should lift the policy rate above the previous cycle’s peak for the first time since 1981. The milestone possibly reflects the central bank’s confidence in financial market conditions. The previous two economic downturns exposed the weaknesses in the financial system and forced the Fed to develop policy tools designed to prevent a crisis. Therefore, we may be heading into a new finance regime in which the Federal Reserve raises interest rates, but also maintains those rates for much longer. If we are correct, the tech sector’s dominance in the S&P 500 is likely over. However, the financial services industry could be on the ascent.

  • The Fed’s new policy tools will be tested as the central bank ramps its balance sheet reduction and rate hikes over the next few months. Quantitative tightening is expected to cause financial strain as traders struggle to get deals done. The Bloomberg U.S. Government Securities Liquidity Index, a gauge of deviations in yield compared to a fair value model, dropped to its lowest level since March 2020. The deterioration in the index suggests that traders find it more challenging to exchange treasuries for cash and vice versa. If the problem worsens, the Fed will be forced to intervene. Although the financial system is withstanding monetary tightening now, we are still not sure that a financial mishap will not take place in the future. In the event of a blowup in the financial system, we expect the Fed to become more accommodative in its rate policy. As a result, we believe that the Fed could pause or cut rates by mid-2023 if financial conditions deteriorate significantly.

The West Needs a Break: The European Union and the U.S. are exploring ways to prevent further inflation within their respective regions.

  • Vice President of the European Central Bank Luis de Guindos wants to anchor inflation expectations. In a speech to EU ministers, Guindos urged the central bank to prioritize price stability over growth. His comments are another example that the central bank could look to slow GDP growth in Europe to tame inflation. Higher European interest rates increase the likelihood that the region will fall into recession, leading to further fragmentation throughout the bloc. That said, a decline in gas prices could provide a tailwind for Europe, but we are not optimistic about that happening anytime soon.
  • As energy woes continue in Europe, EU countries rolled out plans designed to protect households from big jumps in their utility bills. France plans to cap energy price increases at 15% for next year. Meanwhile, Germany is considering purchasing a controlling stake in gas import company Uniper (UNPRF, $4.08) to ensure the company does not fall into bankruptcy. These extreme actions by countries demonstrate the growing angst over energy security.
  • The U.S. rail workers reached a tentative agreement with rail companies to avert a strike on Wednesday. At the last minute, White House officials intervened on a deal that secured better pay and improved working conditions for workers. A shutdown would have prevented almost 30% of cargo shipments by weight from shipping in the U.S., potentially adding to already elevated inflationary pressure. The agreement ended a two-year negotiation and will be welcomed by markets.

Ukraine War and Russian Sanctions Update: As Ukrainian troops continue to progress in their counteroffensive, the West looks for new ways to punish Russia for the invasion.

  • The West wants Turkey to stop helping Russia avoid sanctions. Although a NATO ally, Turkey has tried to remain neutral in the Ukraine conflict. It has supplied Ukraine with sophisticated military drones to help in its war efforts while deepening its trade ties with Russia. Turkey has received limited pushback from the U.S. and Europe up to this point. However, this may change soon. The West is considering slapping sanctions on Turkish banks that are integrated into Russia’s domestic payment system, known as MIR. The crackdown from the West suggests that it will become less conciliatory toward neutral countries that aid Russia in averting sanctions.
  • Chinese President Xi and Russian President Putin met in Uzbekistan on Thursday at the Shanghai Cooperation Organization Summit. The two countries will discuss the ongoing war in Ukraine, with Russia hoping for additional support from China. Despite the two’s agreement that their relationship has no limits, Beijing has implicitly shown that it is unwilling to run afoul of U.S. sanctions. China’s position is unlikely to change as Russia’s inability to secure a quick invasion, as it initially promised, has made it look weak in the eyes of many within the Chinese leadership. Moreover, China’s lack of military support will likely make Russia’s losses from the war even greater.
    • Although there is some speculation that U.S. actions in Taiwan could lead China to ramp up its support for Russia, we are not so sure. In our view, Russia’s vulnerabilities may have encouraged the U.S. to take a greater interest in Taiwan as the sovereign island has much more geopolitical significance than Ukraine. Thus, there are likely factions within the Chinese Communist Party that are less inclined to support the additional backing to Russia.

View PDF

Weekly Energy Update (September 15, 2022)

by Bill O’Grady, Thomas Wash, and Patrick Fearon-Hernandez, CFA | PDF

Crude oil prices remain under pressure on recession fears.

(Source: Barchart.com)

Crude oil inventories rose 2.4 mb compared to a 2.5 mb build forecast.  The SPR declined 8.4 mb, meaning the net draw was 6.0 mb.

In the details, U.S. crude oil production was steady at 12.1 mbpd.  Exports rose 0.1 mbpd, while imports declined 1.0 mbpd.  Refining activity rose 0.6% to 91.5% of capacity.

(Sources: DOE, CIM)

The above chart shows the seasonal pattern for crude oil inventories.  The rise in stockpiles over the past two weeks is contra-seasonal.  As the chart shows, we are nearing the seasonal trough in inventories.  The build seen in October into November is usually due to refinery maintenance.  With the SPR withdrawals continuing, the seasonal build could be exaggerated this year.

Since the SPR is being used, to some extent, as a buffer stock, we have constructed oil inventory charts incorporating both the SPR and commercial inventories.

Total stockpiles peaked in 2017 and are now at levels last seen in 2003.  Using total stocks since 2015, fair value is $106.07.

The SPR has been falling rapidly.

With so many crosscurrents in the oil markets, we are beginning to see some degree of normalization.  The inventory/EUR model suggests oil prices should be around $66 per barrel, so we are seeing about $20 of risk premium in the market.

Natural Gas Update

Now that summer is behind us, it’s time to examine the state of the natural gas market as winter approaches.  Currently, on a rolling 12-month basis, supply is exceeding consumption.

Some of the supply improvement has come from rising net imports.  As the chart below shows, the U.S. was a net importer of natural gas until late 2017 (again, on a rolling 12-month basis).  Since then, the U.S. is a net exporter, hence the negative net import reading. The recent rise in net imports appears to be tied to the Freeport LNG disruption, as LNG exports have fallen.  By next spring, that facility is expected to be at full production, which will reduce American supplies, assuming steady production.

Although supply has been ample, hot summer weather has lifted consumption and puts the U.S. at a modest storage deficit going into autumn.

This model seasonally adjusts storage levels, and the deviation line shows the difference between current and normal storage.

Expectations of rising LNG exports have pushed U.S. natural gas prices well above seasonal norms.  As always, the key to prices in the winter is temperature.  One way to measure the impact of temperature on energy demand is using the concept of the degree day.  The degree day measures the average temperature (high + low/2) compared to 65o with the idea that no climate control is necessary at that temperature.  If above 65o, cooling is required while if below, heating is required.  The temperature deviation is then adjusted by population.  Below are the deviations from normal.

Heating degree day values tend to be higher than cooling because extreme cold is more common than extreme heat.  A temperature of 0o generates a heating degree day where the equivalent would be 130o for a cooling degree day.  Thus, on the above charts, we have scaled the degree days equally.  Casual observation would suggest that winters have become milder as the last extreme cold month, December 2000, was a heating degree day of 200 which has not been exceeded since.  Such readings were far more common in the 1970s.  On the cooling side, there is a clear upward drift in deviations.  It is quite possible that rising greenhouse gas levels are a factor in both warmer winters and hotter summers, but one cannot rule out longer cycle factors, such as sunspots.  What this means for natural gas markets is that colder winters may not be as bullish a factor as it once was, but summers pay a larger role in demand.

Market news:

  • As autumn approaches, natural gas demand tends to decline. Moderate temperatures ease electric demand.  There is always a risk of hurricane disruption in the Gulf of Mexico, but so far this year, the region has been spared from storms.  Hurricane season peaks, on average, by September 10, so there is a growing chance that we will avoid a serious disruption from tropical activity.  Although EU natural gas inventories have increased, it is important to remember that inventory is a supplement to production and imports.  Thus, to ensure ample supplies, barring a mild winter, U.S. LNG flows, which have been critical to the inventory build, will need to continue.  This means that U.S. natural gas prices will remain elevated, unless the U.S. decides to curtail exports.
  • A follow-on effect of high natural gas prices is high fertilizer prices as natural gas is an important feedstock for fertilizers, and tight supplies are hammering the European fertilizer industry. In response, Germany has been increasing chemical imports.
  • One of the surprises over the past 18 months has been the lack of supply response from the oil industry in the face of elevated prices. A key reason is the worry about policy changes leading to stranded assets.  We expect this fear to cap the supply response and keep oil prices high.
  • Although the supply situation for crude oil remains bullish, demand is cyclical and as the odds of a recession rise, the potential for demand destruction is increased as well.
  • One of the key elements of recent legislation was permitting reforms. Environmentalists and other groups have been using the courts to prevent pipeline construction, for example.  The Inflation Reduction Act is designed to reduce the time of objections to construction.  Interestingly enough, it could work the other way.  Although intermittency is a hinderance to using solar and wind power, long-range electricity distribution could, in theory, counter intermittency by allowing solar or wind power to be sent long distances when it might be dark and calm.  This bill should help that process as well, as often proposals for electricity lines face local objections.

 Geopolitical news:

  • It is looking increasingly like a return to the Iran nuclear deal isn’t going to occur. To some extent, it appears that Iran won’t take “yes” for an answer.  The White House has generally accepted Iran’s demands, only to see new ones emerge.  We suspect the Iranian leadership needs an enemy much like the Castros do in Cuba; it is hard to repress one’s population without an ever-present enemy.  We have been skeptical of a deal and despite continued negotiations, it doesn’t look like one is coming.
  • Part of managing sanctions is the use of GPS and vessel transponders. Increasingly, software is spoofing this system, reducing the effectiveness of sanctions. Actual interdiction is still possible but would require a much larger military effort.
  • Lebanon has been in a financial crisis for some time. Things have gotten worse as the central bank has stopped supplying dollars to energy importers, leading to soaring product prices.

 Alternative energy/policy news:

  View PDF