Daily Comment (October 21, 2019)

by Bill O’Grady, Thomas Wash, and Patrick Fearon-Hernandez, CFA

[Posted: 9:30 AM EDT]

Note: After a long hiatus, we have resumed podcasting.  Our new series, titled The Confluence of Ideas, begins with an overview of “Hegemonic Stability Theory” (the program title links to our podcast page).  Our plan is to record a new episode about every 10 days, or three per month.  We hope you enjoy them—let us know what you think!

Happy Monday!  An update on Brexit, and our thoughts on the drug cartels in Mexico.  Unrest is springing up all over the world and so are elections.  Here are the details:

Brexit: The anticipated vote didn’t happen on Saturday.  Instead, Parliament passed a measure that forces PM Johnson to ask for an extension.  He sent an unsigned letter to Donald Tusk asking for the action.  Initially, this vote looked like a major blow for Johnson but, in reality, it appears the vote was to ensure that a hard Brexit won’t occur on Halloween.  Johnson intends to bring his bill up again this week and estimates of votes suggest he will get the 320 needed to pass.[1]  In other words, a slim majority has decided this is the best deal they are going to get and favor Johnson’s plan; they didn’t vote for it on Saturday, opting for the other measure, in order to prevent a hard Brexit.

That being said, there is still a good bit of uncertainty.  Labour may attach a call for a second referendum, this time on Johnson’s bill.  This position might gain favor even if Johnson’s bill passes if the majority is narrow.  If a second referendum is held, there is a rising possibility that the U.K. stays in the EU.  Why?  Because of demographics.  Older voters support Brexit; younger voters don’t.  Over the past 30 months since Brexit started, older voters have died and more young people have become eligible to vote.  The GBP continues to swing based on sentiment toward Brexit; as the odds of a hard Brexit fade, the currency has been appreciating.

Mexico: Last week, in the city of Culiacan, there was a firefight between Mexican troops and gunmen associated with Joaquin Guzman, the son of “El Chapo,” the notorious drug lord.  After capturing the young Guzman, authorities returned him to his “associates” following the cartel’s threats to assassinate Federal officers in their control.  This situation is quite disturbing.  Harkening back to Thomas Hobbes, we give the state a monopoly on violence to protect us from lawlessness.  A monopoly on violence, according to Max Weber, is one of the hallmarks of a nation.  The fact that drug cartels control much of Mexico weakens the government’s claim on sovereignty.  Although this doesn’t necessarily prevent investors from considering Mexico as a destination for funds, the tenuous nature of state control does have to be taken into account.

Unrest spreading: We are seeing civil unrest spreading around the world.  There was another round of protests in Hong Kong on SundayProtestors across the political spectrum came out against corruption in Lebanon.  Meanwhile, in Chile, protests against a fare hike for public transportation are expanding rapidly.  The Pinera government has rescinded the hike but unrest has continued, enough to trigger state-of-emergency declarations.  Eight people have reportedly been killed in the rioting.  Protests have emerged in other South American nations, including Argentina and Ecuador.  The common themes in these protests are opposition to corruption and a reaction against austerity.  We are continuing to monitor Hong Kong, although we suspect that, in the end, Beijing will bring things under control.  The unrest in Chile is escalating and the government’s reaction has been rather harsh.  Chile has been one of the most stable nations in the region, so civil disorder there does raise concerns.  Lebanon is divided, therefore small protests can spin into big ones relatively quickly.

Elections: The Swiss held elections over the weekend, in which the Greens had the best showing.  The center-right will continue to dominate the government.  Vote counting continues in Bolivia.  It appears the vote will be inconclusive and a run-off will be necessary, although the fact that election officials stopped updating results has raised concerns of a “fix.”  Canadians go to the polls today in a race that is too close to callArgentina will hold its elections next week.

Germany: The Bundesbank said the country’s economy may have contracted in the third quarter.  If so, it would mean Germany has entered its first recession in six years.  That confirms the view of most analysts, and it suggests continued weakness in the overall Eurozone economy and strong headwinds for Eurozone stocks.

Global fiscal policy: At the annual meetings of the IMF and World Bank over the last week, multiple finance ministers and central bankers suggested the threat of further slowing in the global economy calls for increased fiscal stimulus.  The officials specifically noted that easy monetary policy is now probably at the limit of what it can do to support the economy.

China trade: There was some optimism expressed by China on the progress of trade talks.  However, there were no details offered.  The optimism is helping equities this morning.

Syria: U.S. troops are decamping for western Iraq, although the administration is considering leaving a small contingent in Syria.  Kurdish forces have withdrawn from the border as part of the ceasefire agreement.

Odds and ends: JP Morgan (JPM, 120.56) is announcing a new plan to reintroduce those with criminal backgrounds into the workforce.  Some of this is likely part of recent announcements by the Business Roundtable to move beyond mere shareholder interest in setting policy, but it is also possible that tight labor markets are prompting the move.  Although fears have eased, there are still worries about financial market liquidity.  One of the characteristics of cyberwar is that it can be difficult to determine the source of the attack.  Russia has taken this a step further, instigating attacks and making it appear that Iran was behind them.  It’s getting so hard to find financing in the shale oil patch that some firms are turning to directly securitizing wells.  This action effectively turns ownership of the well over to a special purpose vehicle which pays out production revenue to bondholders.  These bonds could have some interesting characteristics; rising oil prices might actually boost the value.  At the same time, it would shift a number of risks to bondholders, including faster decline rates and regulatory changes.  Mario Draghi presides over his last ECB meeting on Thursday.

View the complete PDF


[1] Although there are 650 seats in Parliament, the Commons Speaker and his three deputies don’t vote.  And, Sinn Fein has seven seats in Parliament but refuses to sit in the House of Commons.  That means there are effectively 639 seats, so 320 will pass a measure.

Keller Quarterly (October 2019)

Letter to Investors

I recently had the opportunity to give a talk to a large group of investment advisors, many of whom were longtime friends.  Even though we knew each other well, given the times we’re in I felt compelled to begin with a two-part preamble concerning investing that I sometimes give when speaking to people whom I’ve not previously met.

First: we don’t invest in the world we wish we had, we only get to invest in the world we have.  These days people have such definite ideas about the way the world should be as to economics and politics that every thought they have about investing is colored by the same biases.  Such thinking is deadly to successful investing.  No one invests in the world that ought to be, but only in the world that is.  (See David Hume’s is-ought fallacy, a common logical flaw.) Rather, figure out what is going on now and invest according to the present.  Neither the utopian ideal nor its dystopian alternative are friends to successful investing today.

Second: successful investors are not forecasters, they are odds-makers.  In other words, they do not see the future, but rather they invest according to probabilities.  So many people who wouldn’t dare to believe in fortune-tellers easily believe those who claim to see the future of economics and markets.  Economic and stock market forecasters don’t claim clairvoyance or dress like Merlin (except when they are granted their Ph.D.s), but many seem happy to have the rest of us believe they have such abilities.  In fact, the demand for knowledge of the financial future is so great that there will always be a market for such seers.

Of course, no one can see the future.  (I shouldn’t have to write that.)  The best that anyone can do, whether in business or investing (or any other pursuit), is to estimate the probabilities of various outcomes and invest in favor of the highest probable outcomes.  That is easier in some professions than others, depending on the degree of regularity and the role of randomness (luck).  For example, it’s much easier to predict how many Americans will brush their teeth in 2020 than it is to predict whether America will have a recession in 2020.

Unfortunately for us in the investment business, market performance and economics are affected by a high degree of randomness.  Don’t let anyone tell you differently.  Our investment processes are geared to our estimations of the highest probability outcomes, not a prediction of the future.  That’s an important distinction.  Even though we at Confluence may occasionally use words such as “forecast” or “expected return” in our communications, rest assured that we have not gained any special resource for fortune-telling.  We are just using the conventions of language.

In his Divine Comedy, Dante discovers that fortune-tellers are in the fourth trench of the Eighth Circle of Hell.  (By Dante’s geography, that’s far down there.)  Their eternal punishment is to have their heads mounted backwards on their bodies, so that they can only see behind them and thus can only walk backwards.  In Dante’s Hell, sinners receive as punishment the logical outcomes of their actions.  Indeed, it’s my experience that those who get lucky with a stock market forecast that turns out to be correct begin thinking they really do have the “skill” to forecast market action.  They then become slaves of the past, forever living off past glories and looking for history to repeat itself.

It’s our desire to keep our eyes and feet pointed in the same direction.

We appreciate your confidence in us.

 

Gratefully,

Mark A. Keller, CFA
CEO and Chief Investment Officer

View the PDF

Asset Allocation Weekly (October 18, 2019)

by Asset Allocation Committee

In 2017, we introduced an indicator of the basic health of the economy and added it to the many charts we monitor to gauge market conditions.  The indicator is constructed using commodity prices, initial claims and consumer confidence.  The thesis behind this indicator is that these three components should offer a simple and clear picture of the economy; in other words, rising initial claims coupled with falling commodity prices and consumer confidence is a warning that a downturn may be imminent.  The opposite condition should support further economic recovery.  In this report, we will update the indicator with September data.

This chart shows the results of the indicator and the S&P 500 since 1995.  The updated chart shows that the upward momentum in the economy slowed last year but it does remain well above zero.  We have placed vertical lines at certain points when the indicator fell below zero.  It works fairly well as a signal that equities are turning lower, but there is a lag.  In other words, by the time this indicator suggests the economy is in trouble, the recession is very near and the equity markets have already begun their decline.

To make the indicator more sensitive, we took the 18-month change and put the signal threshold at minus 1.0.  This provides an earlier bearish signal and also eliminates the false positives that the zero threshold generates.  Nevertheless, the fact that this variation of the indicator is just below zero raises caution.

What does the indicator say now?  The economy has decelerated but is not yet at a point where investors should become overly defensive.  At the same time, the 18-month change in the indicator has fallen below zero; in 2016, this situation led to several months of sideways market activity.  If we continue to see the lower chart hover around zero, the greater the likelihood that equities will flatten.  Thus, reducing equity risk by rebalancing for a more defensive equity sector exposure would be prudent.

View the PDF

Daily Comment (October 18, 2019)

by Bill O’Grady, Thomas Wash, and Patrick Fearon-Hernandez, CFA

[Posted: 9:30 AM EDT]

Note: After a long hiatus, we have resumed podcasting.  Our new series, titled The Confluence of Ideas, begins with an overview of “Hegemonic Stability Theory” (the program title links to our podcast page).  Our plan is to record a new episode about every 10 days, or three per month.  We hope you enjoy them—let us know what you think!

Happy Friday!  China GDP growth eases.  Ceasefire in Turkey.  Here are the details:

China:  Third quarter GDP was up just 6.0% year-over-year, compared with annual increases of 6.2% in the second quarter, and 6.4% in each of the two quarters before that.  The growth rate in the third quarter was not only weaker than expected, but it was also the slowest expansion in some 30 years.  The slowdown stemmed primarily from the U.S.-China trade war, cooling manufacturing investment and weaker income growth; along with the simple fact that the economy is much bigger, and more mature than it was during its peak growth period in the early 2000s.  Of course, China’s true growth rates are widely considered to be even weaker than the official data indicates.  The really intriguing thing about today’s report is that the government was willing to release such a weak number.  Along with its generally limited stimulus measures in recent months, this could reflect a deliberate decision to signal that slower growth is now acceptable and won’t necessarily lead to new fiscal, or monetary policy responses that might worsen the country’s debt load.  The data has therefore weighed heavily on Chinese stocks today, driving them sharply lower.

U.S.-China Trade:  Right before the latest round of U.S.-China trade talks early this month, National Economic Council Director Kudlow arranged for a group of outside economists to meet with President Trump and explain how trade uncertainty is hurting the economy.  Tellingly, Trump reportedly pushed back, blaming the Federal Reserve for not doing enough to boost the economy.  All the same, it is possible that the economists’ message helped convince the president to strike the partial deal with the Chinese.  The question is whether the message will stick long enough to prevent a reversion to Trump’s tough tactics against China.

Ceasefire:  Turkey has agreed to a five-day ceasefire on the southern border, which eases the threat of U.S. sanctions.  However, there are reports that suggest the agreement is already being violated as shelling and drone strikes have apparently occurred.  It appears to us that it is unlikely Turkey will “take its foot off the gas pedal” in this fight, so even this limited ceasefire probably won’t be strictly followed.

Brexit:  There isn’t a whole lot more to say on this topic.  The vote will occur at 4:00 pm (11:00 am EDT), on Saturday.   The law needs the vote of 325 MPs.  So far, Johnson has 287 with certainty.  The DUP’s 10 MPs have already indicated they won’t support the measure, and Johnson pushed 23 former Tories out of his party.  It is expected that a majority of these 23 (not included in the 287) will likely support the measure.  Thus, to push this through, he needs some Labour support.  The FT’s current estimate suggests neither side has this locked up; their headcount is 321 against, 318 for.  That means that Johnson must woo seven of the remaining 11 undecided MPs to pass his plan.  The prediction markets still have the measure failing, 40% to 60%.  However, the odds have improved over the past 24 hours, from a 26% chance of passage.  If the measure fails, the Benn Act requires that Johnson ask for an extension from the EU; we do expect it to be granted, but there is no guarantee it will be.  BREAKING:  FRENCH PRESIDENT MACRON INDICATES HE WILL REJECT AN EXTENSION.   If one of the remaining 27 nations in the EU votes against an extension, a hard Brexit on Halloween would be looming.  Our take?  The chances of more Labour defections is elevated and the chances of passage with a close vote may be higher than it looks, while the possibility of a hard Brexit may move some votes to Johnson’s side.

Japan:  Prime Minister Abe’s cabinet has approved draft legislation that would require foreigners to advise the government before buying more than 1% of Japanese defense-sector stocks.  The move shows how protectionism is moving beyond trade and into the realm of international investment.  As we’ve been discussing recently, similar moves are afoot in the U.S. Congress, with the potential to seriously alter the makeup of the U.S. bond and stock markets as well as the prospects for the dollar.

Japan:  Defense Minister Kono said Japan will send naval ships and patrol planes to the Gulf of Oman to help protect oil shipments through the area.  However, reflecting Japan’s growing confidence in its large and capable navy, the Japanese forces will operate independently rather than joining the U.S.-led coalition being formed to help with that task.

The strike:  Although negotiations between General Motors (GM, 36.19) and the UAW have reached a tentative agreement, the union has decided to maintain the walkout.  This is a bit unusual; normally, once a deal is reached, the union calls off the strike on the assumption that the rank and file will approve.  The agreement, from our reading, doesn’t appear to be all that firm on future jobs; there was no detail released on future investment, and no guarantees on bringing jobs back from Mexico.  Thus, even though there is more money for workers in the proposed contract, passage isn’t certain.

Odds and ends:  Bolivians go to the polls on Sunday to decide if Evo Morales will get a fourth term (a violation of the constitution).   Germany expresses concern over a U.S./EU trade conflictChina has acquired a lease to the entire island of Tulagi, a major potential threat to Australia and New Zealand.   After the Senate failed to overturn a veto on wall funding, a budget battle looms that could shut down the government next month.  Saudi Arabia has delayed the Saudi Aramco IPO.  Protests against the jailing of Catalan-independence leaders continues to worsen, including violent clashes with police in Barcelona and elsewhere in the region.  However, the violence is starting to cause cleavages in the independence movement.  It is also further weakening the ruling Socialist Party ahead of the elections on November 10.

Energy update:  Crude oil inventories rose 9.3 mb compared to an expected build of 3.1 mb.

In the details, U.S. crude oil production was unchanged at 12.6 mbpd.  Exports fell 0.2 mbpd while imports rose 0.1 mbpd.  The rise in stockpiles was mostly due to continued declines in refinery demand (see below).

(Sources: DOE, CIM)

This chart shows the annual seasonal pattern for crude oil inventories.  We are now into the autumn build season, which usually lasts into early December.

The most important information from this week’s data is that we are now well into the autumn refinery maintenance season.

(Sources: DOE, CIM)

The drop in refinery utilization should end with this week’s data.  However, the decline refining is well more than normal and is having a bearish effect on oil prices.

Based on our oil inventory/price model, fair value is $62.41; using the euro/price model, fair value is $47.31.  The combined model, a broader analysis of the oil price, generates a fair value of $51.74.   We are seeing a clear divergence between the impact of the dollar and oil inventories.  Given that we are into the maintenance season, we would normally expect inventories to continue to rise.  Prices will remain sensitive to Saudi output and tensions in the Middle East.

View the complete PDF

Daily Comment (October 17, 2019)

by Bill O’Grady, Thomas Wash, and Patrick Fearon-Hernandez, CFA

[Posted: 9:30 AM EDT] The EU and the PM Johnson have a deal.  Trade news continues.  Interesting items emerging from the financial markets.  Here are the details:

Brexit:  In the wee small hours of the morning (at least in the U.S.), EU and U.K. negotiators made a deal on Brexit.  Here are the key points:

  1. The deal is mostly what PM May delivered with one key difference. The May deal forced the entirety of the U.K. to remain in the EU customs union.  Under Johnson, only Northern Ireland is still in the customs union.  In effect, there is a trade barrier between the British Isles and the Irish Sea.  As we suggested earlier, there was a clear chance that Johnson would sell out the DUP to get a deal.  It looks like he did.  The U.K. will now be able to negotiate new trade agreements with other nations, but Northern Ireland won’t be included in whatever arrangement emerges.
  2. The DUP has already come out in opposition. This is to be expected.  However, it should be noted that of the 18 seats in Northern Ireland, seven lean republican (support union with Ireland) and so those seven will likely support the deal.  After all, Northern Ireland’s economic position is enhanced; it will be a member of both the U.K. and EU customs unions and there won’t be a hard border with the Republic of Ireland.  However, for the Unionists this deal is terrifying because it does separate, at least in economic terms, Northern Ireland from the U.K.  That is a step toward unification, although it may be a minor one.
  3. At the same time, the DUP rejection will have an effect on hardline Brexit supporters within the Tories. When the DUP rejected May’s proposal, this group (the “European Study Group”) also rejected her plan.  Johnson has to sway this faction without DUP support—not impossible, but not easy either.
  4. Johnson agreed to language of “maintaining a level playing field” with EU regulations. In theory, this agreement would prevent the U.K. from becoming the “Singapore on the Thames,” a U.K. that is deregulated and thus a threat to the cozy regulated world of the EU.  However, this promise is in the political section and is non-binding.  Elements of Labour that want Brexit, but want to avoid deregulation might take comfort in this agreement and vote for the deal.  Elements of the Conservatives (and the Brexit party) that want the “Singapore” option will have to trust Johnson, and believe these are simple “weasel words.”
  5. The EU will need to accept this deal. All 27.  We suspect they will, but nothing is guaranteed.
  6. Johnson wants the EU to signal it won’t give the U.K. an extension, thus framing this weekend’s vote in Parliament as either “Johnson’s deal or hard Brexit.” So far, the EU has not supported this position.  We would not expect them to, but if Juncker does deliver this for Johnson, it would give him tremendous leverage.
  7. The GBP initially rallied on news of a deal but has fallen rather sharply on fears thar Parliament will, like it did with May, ultimately reject it. Or, Parliament will require amendments, e.g., approval only after a referendum.  So, there is still risk that this could all fall apart.  Johnson needs 320 votes.  He may not be able to pull this off.   He will likely need Labour votes to win and if Johnson’s deal is passed, he will almost certainly win new elections.  However, if Johnson can get the EU to make this vote on Saturday either by deal or hard Brexit, he might just pull it off.
(Source: Barchart)

European Union:  Illustrating how the Brexit deal will affect EU politics, German Chancellor Merkel said Britain’s exit from the union will leave her country with an “excessive burden.”  She therefore demanded that Germany get a rebate from the EU budget.  Given that Germany’s relative weight in the EU will rise after Britain leaves, she may well get what she demands.

European Central Bank:  In a speech yesterday, Bundesbank Chief Weidmann warned against a broadened stimulus policy that many think incoming ECB Chief Lagarde may consider, i.e., buying government bonds in return for infrastructure, or climate change investment.  That adds to similar pushback from French, Dutch and Austrian central bankers.

United States:  The United Auto Workers and General Motors (GM, 36.65) have reached a tentative deal on a new labor contract, although the ongoing strike could continue for as long as two weeks until union leaders approve it.  Whatever the final outlines of the deal, we think the union’s ability to hold out for a full month is a signal of rebounding power for organized labor.  If that rebound continues and broadens, it could eventually become a significant headwind for corporate margins, playing into the environment of greater regulation and increased inflation pressure that we think will evolve over time.

China:  Even if a truce is reached in the U.S.-China trade war, the Chinese government will struggle to reignite growth with fiscal or monetary stimulus measures.  At a conference of local-government development funds this week, officials complained that even if they were given more money, they are running out of attractive infrastructure projects to invest in.  That serves as a reminder that China’s economic slowdown doesn’t just reflect the trade war; it also reflects the fact that the economy is maturing and now has fewer attractive investment opportunities than before.

China:  Based on a survey across 18 cities, Cushman & Wakefield estimates China’s commercial real estate vacancies stood at 20.0% in the third quarter, up from 16.7% in the third quarter of 2018.  The consultancy said the rise in vacancies came not from excess building, but from weaker demand amid the continuing U.S.-China trade war and economic slowdown.

Saudi Arabia:  Confirming our view that the successful missile and drone attacks on Saudi oil facilities last month reflect incompetence, U.S. officials revealed they have struggled to convince the Saudis to upgrade their air defense systems.  According to one official, “We’ve told them their defense system was not up to speed.  But their defense apparatus [and] their central command lack competence.”  Even though the attacks failed to give a lasting boost to oil prices, systemic vulnerabilities in the Saudi air defense network and Iran’s desire to cause pain suggests we may see an even bigger attack from Iran in the future, which could have a larger, more lasting impact on the oil markets.

Odds and ends:  Scotch distillers, facing a tariff jump, are air freighting their precious liquid to the U.S. to beat the deadline.  There has been some rather interesting market action recently.  First, there has been a slew of profitable large option trades that have benefited from policy statements made by the Trump administration.  There are probably three potential reasons (a) insider leaks, (b) really good algorithms, and (c) there have been a number of these positions that haven’t worked but we don’t hear about those.  We reserve judgement for now.  Second, Eurodollar futures options traders are placing bets on negative interest rates.  We doubt these will be profitable, but the fact they are being made is newsworthy.

View the complete PDF

Asset Allocation Quarterly (Fourth Quarter 2019)

  • The U.S. Federal Reserve and other central banks are expected to continue their accommodative postures, especially considering issues stemming from trade impediments.
  • While we retain a relatively sanguine view of the U.S. economy over our three-year cyclical forecast period, we recognize there is increased potential for an economic downturn.
  • Each strategy reflects a more neutral posture, with risk exposure being trimmed and all residing in the U.S.
  • Within equities, our style guidance has shifted to 60% value/40% growth.
  • The prospect of trade-based earnings compression leads us to lean toward firms with larger market capitalizations, particularly those with more defensive characteristics.
  • Heightened geopolitical uncertainty and the potential for elevated volatility in global equity markets encourages an increased allocation to long-term U.S. Treasuries and gold.

View the complete PDF

 

ECONOMIC VIEWPOINTS

The overall economic picture, while still positive, has exhibited recent signs of lethargy. Sentiment remains elevated, though some important surveys are lower than earlier in the year. As an example, the Duke University CFO Global Business Outlook for Q3 2019 indicates less optimism and has trended down from this period last year.[1] Earnings may come under pressure, particularly from trade, as firms continue to absorb the cost of tariffs and reorder supply chains. In addition, as the accompanying chart illustrates, the Chicago Fed’s National Activity Index is measuring softness at a level last seen in 2015.

On the plus side, GDP prints have been positive as have corporate earnings surprises over the latest quarter. The Federal Reserve shaved a quarter-point from the fed funds rate in each of its past two meetings and announced the curtailment of the reduction of its balance sheet beginning on August 1. Owing to recent primary dealers funding pressures, the Fed also expanded its overnight reverse repurchase facility, effectively increasing its balance sheet. It also announced a $60 billion per month increase in the balance sheet through February 2020.

While we believe the Fed will continue to exhibit an accommodative stance, with the potential for further cuts to the fed funds rate and expansion of its balance sheet to preserve short-term funding needs, the Fed may have been too tardy in its pivot to easing. Consequently, there is the potential for a decrease in economic activity.

This chart estimates the probability of recession, a year into the future, based on the yield curve. The current level would be consistent with a recession later next year. In general, the financial indicators of the business cycle are signaling an increased likelihood of recession. On the other hand, purely economic indicators are still signaling a modest expansion. Overall, we would not shift portfolios to a fully defensive posture until both types of indicators indicate recession.

Global economic conditions are similarly mixed. In his last maneuver as chair of the European Central Bank, Mario Draghi furthered the ECB’s ultra-easy monetary policy. Similarly, the Bank of Japan noted it may take preemptive action against economic risks through greater easing. Germany’s GDP declined slightly last quarter and is expected to remain sluggish, especially as its export-oriented economy is influenced by trade tensions. Conversely, the global appetite for yield has helped to lower financing costs. Globally there is roughly $15 trillion of negative-yielding debt, representing almost a quarter of total debt outstanding. This helps support global economies, making it easier for marginal companies to remain solvent, yet with distortions that could hold longer term consequences.

Against this varied backdrop, we find it prudent to lessen our historically high allocations to risk-based assets, preferring to adopt a more neutral posture with associated offsets as detailed in the strategy section of this document (p.5). In deference to global economic uncertainty, all risk exposures remain in the U.S.


[1] https://www.cfosurvey.org/wp-content/uploads/2019/09/2019-Q3-US-Key-Numbers-1.pdf

STOCK MARKET OUTLOOK

In the U.S., earnings growth is likely to be more restrained than what we have experienced over the past three years. As noted above, the CFO survey by Duke University is more muted, with optimism regarding the U.S. economy as well as their own companies lower than prior quarters. Another complication to the earnings picture is the revision to the Bureau of Economic Analysis [BEA] profit calculations. Prior to the revision the operating earnings for the S&P 500 were marginally elevated, yet within model ranges. However, due to the revision, our model suggests that absent a durable catalyst, pressure on earnings growth is likely. As a result, we are reducing our allocations to risk assets and concentrating in the larger capitalization, higher quality segments of U.S. stocks.

As with the past several quarters, we express near-term caution regarding non-U.S. developed and emerging markets. Despite valuations for non-U.S. stocks generally being attractive relative to U.S. counterparts, the elevated level of global economic uncertainty encourages our purely domestic exposure. Within investing styles, we have initiated a 60/40 tilt to value over growth and have introduced an allocation to a quality factor focusing on profitability, earnings quality and lower leverage. Additionally, we have modified the large cap equity sector weightings, retaining a slight overweight to Technology and introducing overweights to the Consumer Staples and Health Care sectors. Among market capitalizations, current exposures now favor large capitalization companies over mid-cap and small cap. Although trailing valuations of lower market cap companies appear attractive, the potential for earnings compression leads us to lean toward firms with larger market capitalizations, particularly those with more defensive characteristics.

BOND MARKET OUTLOOK

The more accommodative posture of the Fed combined with the global appetite for yield should lead to a normally sloped yield curve over the course of the next several quarters. Over our three-year forecast period, we regard longer term Treasuries as relatively attractive given the global yield appetite and the potential for gravitational pull exerted by $15 trillion of bonds outstanding with negative yields. Additionally, longer term U.S. Treasuries should prove resilient in the event of more volatile global equity markets. Although nearly $5 trillion of corporate debt will be maturing before 2023, our caution is directed toward speculative grade, or high yield, corporate bonds where we expect spread widening to occur.

The duration of bond holdings in the strategies with income objectives has been extended slightly, accruing from our forecast for an accommodative Fed, a slowing economy, lack of inflationary pressure and global demand for bonds. We retain the laddered structure as a nucleus beyond the short-term segment in these strategies.

OTHER MARKETS

Despite the outsized returns that many REITs have enjoyed during 2019, the combination of our forecast for rates, the lack of excesses in the segment and the more diversified pool of enterprises leads to our constructive view on REITs. As a result, REITs are included in the income-oriented strategies given the diversified income stream they provide.

We have increased the prior allocation to gold given its ability to offer a hedge against geopolitical risks combined with the safe haven it can afford during an uncertain climate for both equities and the U.S. dollar.

View the complete PDF

Daily Comment (October 16, 2019)

by Bill O’Grady, Thomas Wash, and Patrick Fearon-Hernandez, CFA

[Posted: 9:30 AM EDT] The IMF gives details on weakening global growth.  Brexit is at a crossroads.  Trade tensions with China remain.  Update on Syria.  The National League has its pennant winner; the Cardinals, meanwhile, have much in common with private equity.  The latter spent billions on alleged unicorns that turned out to be donkeys wearing traffic cones on their heads; the Cardinals spent millions on alleged hitters…anyway, here are the details:

Global growth:  As we went to the deadline yesterday, the IMF had just released its updated global economic forecast for 2019 and 2020.  The details are sobering.  The body described the world’s economic situation as “precarious” and reduced growth rates for this year to 3.0%, down from 3.3% in its April forecast.  That would be the slowest growth since 2009.  Next year’s growth is forecast for modestly better, at 3.4%.  The IMF blamed the trade wars and slow monetary policy responses for the downgrade.  World trade is forecast to fall to a 2.5% growth rate, with 90% of the world’s nations looking for slower growth.   The U.S. saw its forecast rise to 2.1% from below 2% in April.  China is forecast to see growth fall below 6% this year.

If trade tensions were to ease, growth would likely recover.  However, such a shift isn’t likely, or expected.   For most of the postwar period, a weaker U.S. economy could drag the rest of the world into lower growth, but the reverse wasn’t necessarily true.  However, due to increased global integration, there is a higher probability that a slower world economy will adversely affect the U.S.

Brexit:  Talks between the U.K. and EU continue, but the problems that bedeviled Theresa May’s Brexit plan have resurfaced for Boris Johnson.   The EU’s red line is no hard border on the Ireland/Northern Ireland frontier.  Johnson seems amenable to that outcome, but has to craft a plan that effectively jettison’s Northern Ireland without the Unionists discovering it.  So far, Johnson also hasn’t managed that hurdle, although the DUP in his government have not rejected the proposal out of hand.  In fact, the DUP may be swayed, in the end by money; there are reports that the Unionists are asking for “billions, not millions” to secure their votes.  Johnson’s problem, like May before him, is all about votes. His plan isn’t attractive enough to bring in votes from outside the Tories, so he needs the Unionists to pass the plan.  Another issue has emerged; Johnson’s vision of the U.K. after Brexit is far different than May’s.  The latter saw Britain apart, but similar to Europe; the former sees the post-Brexit U.K. as a low tax, low regulation alternative to Europe, an outcome that gives EU leadership the willies.  Additionally, there is another complication—Labour is warming to the idea that it might support Johnson’s plan, but only if it includes a second referendum; in other words, the Johnson plan would get tentative approval but only after the public confirms it.  The GBP has eased from yesterday’s strong rally on worries over talks.

China and trade:  The House has passed the Hong Kong Human Rights and Democracy Act; if passed, it would require the executive branch to determine whether political developments in Hong Kong justify its special treatment as a separate trade area.  Beijing, not surprisingly, isn’t happy with this development, threatening unspecified retaliation if it becomes law.  As we noted yesterday, Beijing is pressing the U.S. to rollback $ 50 bn of existing tariffs before agreeing to buy U.S. agricultural products.  Increasingly, there are doubts China will buy all these products anyway.

The Turkish incursion:  The White House continues to take criticism from both wings of the establishment, with strong exception being taken about the impact of sanctions.   VP Pence and SoS Pompeo are in route to Ankara to try and sell Turkish President Erdogan on a ceasefire.  We doubt the U.S. delegation will have much success.  The real worry is whether Russia and Turkey will end up in a direct conflict.  If that were to occur, it would involve a NATO member and the question is, if Article 5 were invoked, would the rest of NATO come to Turkey’s aid?  If NATO demurred, it would seriously question the security guarantee that NATO membership provides, and give Putin something he has desired all along; to break up NATO and give Russia the opportunity to retake eastern Europe.

Repo Rebellion: Following the Federal Reserve’s decision to expand its balance sheets, money market funds, who are among the largest holders of US treasury, have expressed resistance to the measure. Because money market funds are only able to buy assets with no more than 13 months of maturity, it would be more profitable for them to hold on to the US treasuries as opposed to selling its share of treasuries to the Fed and then going back into the market to buy debt with potentially lower yields. The resistance from money market funds will likely add to the angst of the Federal Reserve, as attempts are made to get cooperation from financial institutions to resolve the liquidity concerns in the repo market.

Odds and ends:  France has given a non to Albanian and Northern Macedonian bids to join the EU.  There are an increasing number of areas where a $100k income isn’t enough to buy a home.   Kim Jong un mounted a strong steed as a show to highlight the anger of the North Koreans over continued sanctions.  North and South Korea played to a 0-0 draw in a World Cup qualifying match in Pyongyang in front of an empty stadium.  Apparently, the North Korean leadership was uncomfortable with the potential loss to its southern rival so it implemented a news blackout and didn’t allow spectators.  In the Democratic Party debates last night, the tech sector was a prime target.   There are reports that confirm the U.S. responded to the Iranian attack on Saudi Arabia with a cyber strike.

View the complete PDF


[1] We know, “dog bites man,” right?

Daily Comment (October 15, 2019)

by Bill O’Grady, Thomas Wash, and Patrick Fearon-Hernandez, CFA

[Posted: 9:30 AM EDT] Commercial bankers come back to work today.  The Middle East is a mess, but oil prices haven’t budged.  There was little progress on Brexit, but hope remains.  The Chinese trade deal continues to hit snags; China also released a batch of economic data.  Here are the details:

BREAKING:  IMF LOWERS GLOBAL GROWTH FORECAST TO 3%, LOWEST SINCE THE GREAT FINANCIAL CRISIS. 

Middle East:  The Turkey/Syria situation is devolving at great speed.  As we noted yesterday, Syria and Russia have become the Kurds new ally against Turkey.  The likely cost to the Kurds?  Living again under Assad’s control.  The U.S. imposed sanctions but they were less onerous than feared, and the TRY rallied on the news.  A Saudi diplomat called the U.S. action in Syria a “disaster.”   Russia is working to fill the power vacuum– Alexander Lavrentiev, Russia’s special envoy to Syria, said Turkey’s invasion of northern Syria is unacceptable and was not agreed with President Putin in advance.

As our most recent WGR notes, the Carter Doctrine has been in trouble since 9/11.  What we are seeing now is the logical conclusion of a path we have been on for nearly two decades.  What is happening in the Middle East is a foreshadowing of what will eventually occur in Europe and the Far East.  We suspect that two areas of the world are watching what is happening to the Kurds with great interest—the Baltic states and Taiwan.  They have to wonder if the U.S. will back them from Russian or Chinese aggression.

Chinese trade:  China still hasn’t called last week’s meeting a “deal.”  This reluctance is partly due to China’s concern that President Trump won’t adhere to any agreement.  Our suspicion of what is happening to the U.S./China relationship is strategic ambiguity isn’t working anymore.  For years, both China and the U.S. would say the same things, but mean something quite different; as long as the “bluffs were not called” this didn’t matter much.  Now, the U.S. is forcing clarity, something China isn’t used to.  A new example emerged today.  The U.S. believed that in return for delayed tariffs (that were set to begin yesterday), China was to buy $50 bn of U.S. agricultural products.  Today, China suggested that to be able to make these purchases, the U.S. will need to roll back some of the tariffs currently in place.  China has also indicated it wants more talks before signing any agreement.  Meanwhile, Treasury Secretary Mnuchin has indicated that if a deal isn’t signed next month at APEC, the U.S. could go ahead and implement tariffs announced for mid-December.  The problem with these negotiations is that both sides think they have the upper hand and can, at some point, dictate terms.  As long as this condition exists, getting a deal done will be difficult.

China economic data:  China’s CPI rose 3.0%, a bit more than forecast, driven mostly by an 11.4% jump in food prices.  Pork prices rose 69% from last year, a key factor in the rise of food prices.

Meanwhile, PPI is still deflating.

Total credit grew 12.5% from last year, in line with the past three months.

Overall, the data shows that China has a serious food inflation problem; the fact that it is trying to negotiate lower tariffs in the face of a nearly 70% rise in pork prices is remarkable.  At the same time, deflation at the producer level is a warning sign of weaker growth, and likely reflects problems tied to the trade conflict.

 

Brexit:  We are seeing conflicting messages coming from the EU.[1]  The Finnish PM Antti Rinne, currently the EU’s president (it rotates among members) said overnight that the talks “need more time.”  However, the EU’s chief Brexit negotiator, Michel Barnier, suggested that a withdrawal deal is still “possible.”  We continue to believe that if Johnson wants a deal before Halloween, he has to “lose” Northern Ireland; in other words, he has to put the trade border at the Irish Sea and leave Northern Ireland in the EU customs union.  His current plan is trying to finesse this outcome by leaving Northern Ireland in the U.K. trade zone but adopting EU trade rules depending on the destination of the export or import.  If Johnson doesn’t abandon the Unionists, he will face new elections with a viable Brexit party on his right flank.  We suspect that Johnson will eventually abandon the Unionists which would give him a strong position in upcoming elections.

 

Global Bond Markets:  In his first investment outlook since retiring in March, former PIMCO bond king Bill Gross said that with a global bond market dominated by negative-yielding bonds, investors should favor stocks with a secure dividend.  However, he also warned that future stock price gains are likely to be muted as the impact of falling interest rates fades.

 

Odds and ends:  Spain is in turmoil after a Spanish court jailed pro-independence Catalan leaders.  The decision will complicate November elections.  Although Poland’s populist PiS party won the weekend’s election, it failed to control the upper house, making its win less impressive.  Although we rarely comment on U.S. elections this early, we are closely monitoring developments.  Apparently, Mayor Bloomberg is noting that the establishment “lane” may be opening and is considering running for the Democratic Party nomination.  The 2020 election has the potential to be as divisive as the 1860 election due to stark divisions among American voters.

View the complete PDF


[1] We know, “dog bites man,” right?

Weekly Geopolitical Report – The End of the Carter Doctrine: Part I (October 14, 2019)

by Bill O’Grady

In our 2018 Mid-Year Geopolitical Outlook we opened the report with an analysis of America’s evolving hegemony.  We noted that America’s hegemonic narrative centered on containing communism.  This factor united Americans to accept the burden of the superpower role.  However, embedded in that commitment to contain communism was the “freezing” of three conflict zones.

In Part I of this report, we will identify and reiterate the need to stabilize these three areas in order to maintain global peace.  We will focus on the Middle East and discuss the development of the Carter Doctrine and examine how the doctrine has been enforced since its inception.  In Part II, we will discuss the reasons for the breakdown of the order prior to President Trump and follow this discussion with the impact of the current president.  We will project the likely actions of the nations in the region and, as always, conclude with market ramifications.

View the full report