Weekly Geopolitical Report – Turkey Lashing Out (August 5, 2019)

by Patrick Fearon-Hernandez, CFA

Here at Confluence, we write a lot about the rise and fall of hegemonic states – those great nations that develop enough power and influence to dominate the global economy, or at least some region of it.  These superpowers use their extraordinary military might and other levers to impose order on their sphere of influence, providing the security necessary for international trade.  They also provide the reserve currency that acts as a common medium of exchange for that trade.  These hegemons therefore provide the foundation on which a global or regional economy can function.

During the Cold War, the United States accepted leadership of the Free World and acted as hegemon for the non-communist bloc.  After the disintegration of the Soviet Union and the demise of Soviet-style communism in 1991, the United States became a global hegemon.  What is now less appreciated is that the burdens of hegemony and the demise of Soviet communism have eroded the willingness of U.S. citizens to maintain their country’s leading role in the world.  At the same time, the removal of the Soviet threat has encouraged other nations to once again assert their own interests and the freedom of action they sacrificed to come under U.S. protection during the Cold War.  This week’s report looks at one of the best examples of that dynamic, the recent discord between Turkey and the United States, which has culminated in Turkey’s defiant purchase of a Russian air-defense system.  We will review Turkey’s political dynamics and why its president, Recep Erdogan, has implemented a more assertive foreign policy that is putting the country at odds with the United States and the West, in general.  As always, we conclude with a discussion of the resulting market implications.

View the full report

Weekly Geopolitical Report – The Mid-Year Geopolitical Outlook (June 24, 2019)

by Bill O’Grady

(Due to the Independence Day holiday and a short summer hiatus, the next report will be published July 15.)

As is our custom, we update our geopolitical outlook for the remainder of the year as the first half comes to a close.  This report is less a series of predictions as it is a list of potential geopolitical issues that we believe will dominate the international landscape for the rest of the year.  It is not designed to be exhaustive; instead, it focuses on the “big picture” conditions that we believe will affect policy and markets going forward.  They are listed in order of importance.

Issue #1: Deglobalization

Issue #2: Election Meddling

Issue #3: Iran

Issue #4: China

View the full report

Weekly Geopolitical Report – The Mid-Year Geopolitical Outlook (June 25, 2018)

by Bill O’Grady

(Due to the Independence Day holiday, the next report will be published July 9.)

As is our custom, we update our geopolitical outlook for the remainder of the year as the first half comes to a close.  This report is less a series of predictions as it is a list of potential geopolitical issues that we believe will dominate the international landscape for the rest of the year.  It is not designed to be exhaustive; instead, it focuses on the “big picture” conditions that we believe will affect policy and markets going forward.  They are listed in order of importance.

Issue #1: America’s Evolving Hegemony

Issue #2: Rising Western Populism

Issue #3: Rising Authoritarianism

View the full report

Weekly Geopolitical Report – Reflections on Nationalism: Part III (September 11, 2017)

by Bill O’Grady

Three weeks ago, we began our series on nationalism.  In Part I, we discussed social contract theory before and after the Enlightenment.  We examined three social contract theorists, Thomas Hobbes, John Locke and Jean-Jacques Rousseau.  In Part II, we recounted Western history from the American and French Revolutions into WWII.  From there, we examined America’s exercise of hegemony and the key lessons learned from the interwar period.  This week, we will begin with an historical analysis of the end of the Cold War and the difficulties that have developed in terms of the post-WWII consensus and current problems.  We will discuss the tensions between the U.S. superpower role and the domestic problems we face.  Next, we will analyze populism, including its rise and the dangers inherent in it.  As always, we will conclude with market ramifications.

View the full report

Weekly Geopolitical Report – Reflections on Nationalism: Part II (August 28, 2017)

by Bill O’Grady

(Due to the Labor Day holiday, the next report will be published on September 11.)

Last week, we began our series on nationalism.  In Part I of this report, we discussed social contract theory before and after the Enlightenment.  We examined three social contract theorists, Thomas Hobbes, John Locke and Jean-Jacques Rousseau.  This week, in Part II, we will recount Western history from the American and French Revolutions into WWII.  From there, we will analyze America’s exercise of hegemony and the key lessons learned from the interwar period.

In two weeks, in Part III, we will begin with an historical analysis of the end of the Cold War and the difficulties that have developed in terms of the post-WWII consensus and current problems.  We will discuss the tensions between the U.S. superpower role and the domestic problems we face.  From there, an analysis of populism will follow, including its rise and the dangers inherent in it.  As always, we will conclude with market ramifications.

View the full report