Daily Comment (April 3, 2020)

by Bill O’Grady, Thomas Wash, and Patrick Fearon-Hernandez, CFA

[Posted: 9:30 AM EDT]

Happy Friday!  It’s employment Friday, although this may be one of the most irrelevant reports ever.  Since the survey is conducted around the 10th of the month, much of the jump in claims won’t be reflected in this report.  But, our quick take is that the weakness was profound as payrolls plunged 701k and the unemployment rate jumped to 4.4%; we have the details below.  We update the COVID-19 news.  Global stocks are under pressure, while oil makes a historic rally.  Here are the details:

COVID-19:  The official number of global cases is 1,030,628, with 54,137 fatalities and 218,771 recoveries.

The virus news:

The policy news:

The chart shows that for the month ending March 20, $32 billion has left investment grade.  The past two weeks have been far worse.  A net $560 billion of corporate debt has been downgraded, with $97 billion now officially fallen angels.

  • The Fed’s various support programs purposely exclude high yield. Bill Dudley, the former NY FRB president, recently argued that the Fed should not include such bonds on the basis of moral hazard.  We understand the sentiment but would argue that now is not the time to enforce market discipline because it is very difficult to know which debtor will trigger systemic problems and which won’t.
  • We have been generally optimistic, all things considered, because of the aggressive policy response. Although we remain so, we are worried that the combination of the lack of execution and short-sighted reluctance to support all borrowers will trigger unanticipated negative outcomes.  To quote the recently departed Kenny Rogers, “…there will be time enough for countin’ when the dealin’s done.”
  • Another area to watch is mortgages; defaults are almost certain to spike, and we doubt the nation would tolerate another response like we saw after the Great Financial Crisis.
  • Members of the FOMC are pressing for more fiscal stimulus.

The economic news:

  • As we continue to digest the incoming U.S. economic data and how it’s starting to reflect COVID-19, we think it’s important to emphasize that the March ISM Manufacturing Index released this week probably overstated the health of the factory sector.  The overall index fell to 49.1 in March, only modestly below the 50 level that indicates expansion, and not dramatically weaker than the readings of 50.1 in February and 50.9 in January. The figure for March was actually above every reading from August through December 2019.  The problem is that the overall figure is the average of five subindexes (new orders, production, employment, supplier deliveries, and inventories), and the subindex on supplier deliveries has been distorting the overall number for several months running.  That subindex measures how long it takes for manufacturers to get their supplies delivered once they’ve placed their orders, with the idea that delayed deliveries are a sign of high demand and strong factory activity.  When the subindex is higher, it means more manufacturers are experiencing delayed deliveries.  The problem is that the recent high numbers for the subindex are more a reflection of supply chain disruptions from last year’s trade war and this year’s virus shutdowns rather than high demand or strong manufacturing activity.  Excluding the distorted supplier delivery subindex from the calculation, the overall ISM Manufacturing Index for March would have been just 45.2, its lowest reading since May 2009.  That’s additional evidence that the economy has now slipped into a deep contraction.  Since the virus shutdowns are sure to keep the subindex on supplier deliveries high over at least the next couple of months, we’ll continue to focus on our adjusted measure of the ISM index to get a better sense of how the factory sector is faring.

  • The chart above shows how the ISM Manufacturing Index, if computed excluding the subindex on supplier deliveries, is now at its lowest level since late in the Great Recession of 2008-2009.
  • We are seeing a steady stream of reports of layoffs, buyouts, and furloughs. We are also seeing reports of wage cuts to maintain employment.

The market news:

  • The key market news is oil. Prices leaped yesterday on reports that President Trump had engineered a meeting of OPEC and Russia with tentative promises of production cuts.  Prices are higher this morning on reports that OPEC+ will hold a virtual meeting on Monday to discuss output reductions.
  • It appears the KSA is trying to get as broad of a group as possible to agree to reductions. This makes sense.  The wider the agreement, the better the chances of success…with one caveat.  Cartels always suffer from free riders.  Although all participants benefit from output constraints, an individual member has a great incentive to cheat.  We do expect some sort of deal on Monday, with promises of 10.0 mbpd of production cuts.  We do not expect cuts of this magnitude to be achieved.  At best, 3.0 to 5.0 mbpd is about all that can be expected, and we seriously doubt Russia will actually cut anything.  Failing to make any sort of deal at this meeting would be a disaster but it would be naïve to expect that compliance will be anywhere near what is promised.  This doesn’t mean a deal won’t have an impact; if the KSA doesn’t raise output to 12.0 mbpd, we probably avoid single-digit oil prices.  But, even with a deal, demand destruction is still a reality and prices in the $20s will be with us for a while.
  • Add this industry to others that have found fortune in the era of COVID-19.

Foreign policy:

View the complete PDF


[1] A fallen angel is an investment-grade bond that has been downgraded to junk status and can no longer be held in an investment-grade bond portfolio.

Daily Comment (April 2, 2020)

by Bill O’Grady, Thomas Wash, and Patrick Fearon-Hernandez, CFA

[Posted: 9:30 AM EDT]

Good morning!  After a drubbing yesterday, we are seeing a rebound in global markets this morning.  One of the factors helping sentiment is a 10% jump in crude oil prices.  The White House is continuing to talk to Russia and the KSA, and the president is meeting with energy executives.  However, Moscow has indicated it won’t change its policy anytime soon.  China announced it is buying oil for its strategic reserves.  Linked here is our updated Weekly Energy Update.  We update all the COVID-19 news, including some charts on what is happening in the economy.  Here are the details:

COVID-19:  The official number of global cases is 951,901 with 48,284 fatalities and 202,342 recoveries.  The FT did not issue an infection chart; we will try to find one for tomorrow.

The virus news:

The policy news:

The economic news:

  • Initial claims jumped to 6.65 million, a new record. We cover the data below.  There has been a surge in layoffs reported recently and the data confirm it.
  • We are seeing a surge in worker revolt. Production workers, delivery drivers, health care workers, warehouse employees, and grocery clerks are starting to push back against what they see are unsafe working conditions.  They have high leverage at this moment.

The market news:

Foreign policy:

Iran:  There are reports that Iran is planning attacks on U.S. military bases in Iraq.  The U.S. is warning Tehran against such actions.

View the complete PDF

Weekly Energy Update (April 2, 2020)

by Bill O’Grady, Thomas Wash, and Patrick Fearon-Hernandez, CFA

Crude oil inventories rose 13.0 mb compared to the forecast rise of 3.5 mb.

In the details, U.S. crude oil production was unchanged at 13.0 mbpd.  Exports fell 0.7 mbpd, while imports declined 0.1 mbpd.  Refining activity fell 5.0%, well more than the 0.1% decline forecast.  The inventory build was due to a combination of falling exports and a severe decline in refinery operations.

(Sources: DOE, CIM)

The above chart shows the annual seasonal pattern for crude oil inventories.  This week’s report has lifted stockpiles well above seasonal norms.  Although not totally unexpected, this is the first week where the impact of COVID-19 and the oil war has started to affect the weekly data.

Based on our oil inventory/price model, fair value is $50.98; using the euro/price model, fair value is $48.95.  The combined model, a broader analysis of the oil price, generates a fair value of $48.59.  Usually, the fair value from the combined model falls within the values generated by the individual models.  Recent volatility has led to some model instability, so the combined model is generating the lowest forecast price.  As we noted recently, the model output is less relevant unless Russia and the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia (KSA) come to an agreement on supply.

In the coming weeks, there are two key factors we will be monitoring.  First, we will start looking at the impact of the virus on demand.  This week, we are seeing the first signs that the virus has affected product demand.  The chart below shows the four-week average of gasoline supplied to the distribution system.  As the chart shows, shipments have cratered.  Distillate demand is holding up better, reflecting the increases in delivery of goods.

We also note that refinery activity is rolling over.

This sort of decline is usually seen during severe weather events, such as hurricanes.  The COVID-19 crisis will almost certainly last longer and thus will negatively impact crude oil consumption.

Second, estimated primary U.S. commercial crude oil storage is around 510.0 mb.  An additional 110.0 mb is available at refineries and in pipelines.  The total capacity of the Strategic Petroleum Reserve (SPR) is 713.5 mb, of which 635 mb is already being utilized, meaning there is an additional 77.5 mb.  Once primary storage is filled, secondary storage will be utilized.  However, it tends to have a higher cost and is less accessible than primary storage.  Producers fund storage costs via the calendar spreads in crude oil.  When the spread is positive, they produce oil today to sell in the future.  Currently, producers can earn $4 per barrel by producing oil now and selling it six months into the future.  The chart below shows the rolling six-month crude oil calendar spread.

Since mid-2013, the correlation between the six-month calendar spread and oil inventories has been at 74.6%, with the spread leading inventories by two months.  The current spread suggests that oil inventories will rise at least another 10 mb over the next two months.

Adding to inventory pressure are two other factors.  First, rising U.S. crude oil exports have been a key factor in reducing U.S. crude oil inventories.  As OPEC+Russia boost output and exports, it will be difficult for exports to be maintained.  If exports decline, that crude oil will need to be stored.

On the international front, so far, the U.S. has had little success in getting either Russia or the KSA to back away from their adversarial positions.  The KSA is poised to dramatically ramp up output.  The U.S. is considering easing Iranian sanctions due to COVID-19.

On the domestic front, the White House is considering restricting oil imports in a bid to protect domestic producers.  Texas regulators are reopening the debate on having the Texas Railroad Commission return to its role of regulating oil production.  Although Congress did not include funding for SPR purchases, the White House is considering a program to allow firms to lease the SPR for additional storage.

In conclusion, the current market fundamentals are about as bearish as we have ever seen.  It will take significant government and OPEC intervention to stop the downdraft.  History suggests that such actions rarely occur until prices reach unfathomable levels.  Although we are friendly to a number of different asset classes, oil isn’t one of them.  Somewhere between now and Labor Day, some sort of resolution is likely, but it probably gets much worse before it improves.

View the PDF

Daily Comment (April 1, 2020)

by Bill O’Grady, Thomas Wash, and Patrick Fearon-Hernandez, CFA

[Posted: 9:30 AM EDT]

Happy April Fool’s Day!  But please don’t expect any foolishness here!  As always, we soberly review the latest U.S. projections on the course of the COVID-19 pandemic, which have rattled the markets so far this morning.  We also note the Fed has come out of the closet as the world’s central bank (see detailed discussion below), while Europe continues to struggle with a way to support its economy.

COVID-19:  Official data show confirmed cases have risen to 874,081 worldwide, with 43,537 deaths and 185,194 recoveries.  In the United States, confirmed cases rose to 189,633, with 4,081 deaths and 7,136 recoveries (though the recovery data is lagging).  Here is the main chart of infections now being published by the Financial Times:

  • Real Economy.  IHS Markit said its final March PMI for the Eurozone manufacturing sector came in at a seasonally adjusted 44.5, modestly lower than the flash estimate of 44.8 and the final February reading of 49.2 (see data tables below).  In the U.K., the IHS Markit/CIPS manufacturing PMI fell to a three-month low of 47.8 in March versus 51.7 in February.  As with all major PMIs, readings under 50 point to falling activity.
  • Financial System.  In a welcome sign that the junk bond market may be stabilizing after seizing up in early March, junk bond prices have improved a bit this week.  At least two major firms have also been able to float riskier debt.  Below-investment grade obligations are still trading at elevated spreads over U.S. Treasuries, but the improved market dynamics suggest that aggressive fiscal and monetary policy may have turned the tide.  All the same:
  • U.S. Monetary Policy Response.  Launching yet another new rescue program, the Fed said it will temporarily allow approximately 170 foreign central banks and international monetary authorities to borrow dollars by pledging the U.S. Treasuries they hold at the New York FRB.  The new “FIMA Repo Facility” will supplement the currency swap facilities already in place with more than a dozen major central banks.  Amid the global scramble for dollars touched off by the coronavirus crisis, the Fed said a key aim of the facility is to give foreign central banks access to the dollars they need without forcing them into disruptive sales of their Treasury holdings.  The facility will likely be considered especially helpful for smaller emerging markets, though China was probably the key country under consideration.  In a broader sense, the facility may be one of the most radical, risky, and controversial of the Fed’s many moves to counter the crisis as it amounts to a full, unabashed embrace of being the world’s central bank or the global lender of last resort.  That role is clearly at odds with the broader U.S. trend toward deglobalization, and it is out of sync with the administration’s policy of withdrawing from the traditional U.S. role as global hegemon.
  • Foreign Fiscal Policy Response.  The EU continues to struggle to come up with fiscal programs that can cushion the blow from the crisis without generating pushback from the northern creditor members.

View the complete PDF

IDEA Dividend Update (March 31, 2020)

A Report from the Value Equities Investment Committee | PDF

Growing dividends are at the core of Confluence’s Increasing Dividend Equity Account (IDEA) strategy. Given the unprecedented nature of a national economic shutdown to combat COVID-19, it is likely that many companies, including some that may be held in the IDEA portfolio, will choose to not grow their dividends and some may even choose to temporarily suspend or decrease their dividends during the economic shutdown. With this possibility in mind we thought it would be helpful to proactively discuss the situation and our planned response prior to any changes companies might make with their dividends.

Why are growing dividends beneficial?

First, it would probably be helpful to review why owning companies with growing dividends is a good investment strategy. When you purchase a stock, you are buying a fractional portion of a company with the expectation of receiving a share of its ongoing cash flow. Each year a company’s earnings (cash flow) may be used to reinvest to grow the company, repurchase shares, pay dividends to the owners, or possibly do all three.

Over the long term, a stock’s total return will be determined by the cash flow growth and dividends paid out to the owners. As a result, a company with a history of consistent and growing dividends indicates a company with consistent and growing cash flow – a recipe for good long-term investment returns.

The team at Confluence has a long track record of identifying and investing in companies that not only have histories of growing dividends but also have solid prospects that those dividends should continue to grow well into the future.

Why would a company temporarily suspend or decrease its dividend in the current environment?

Read the full report

Asset Allocation Quarterly (Second Quarter 2020)

  • The prospect of a recession in the U.S. is nearly a foregone conclusion. The depth will likely be severe, but the duration could be brief.
  • Actions over the past two weeks by the U.S. Federal Reserve should help mitigate the economic crisis, potentially avoiding problems faced in past downturns.
  • The stimulus package signed into law on March 27 offers further assistance for lessening the duration of the contraction.
  • Our three-year forecast is for a recovery and even the potential for expansion toward the end of the forecast period.
  • Risk assets, especially U.S. equities and even corporate bonds, are at attractive valuations in our view.
  • Each strategy now has elevated exposure to equities with a tilt toward growth over value.
  • Though long-term Treasuries have likely run their course, the use of gold as a stabilizer for the strategies remains appropriate.

View the complete PDF

 

ECONOMIC VIEWPOINTS

The COVID-19 virus has plunged the U.S. and global economies into a recession faster and more violently than anyone had forecasted even a month ago. Sheltering at home has ground economic activity to a near-standstill and has resulted in an astounding increase in unemployment claims and consequent business inactivity. Nearly simultaneously, the price of oil has collapsed, owing to the market share battle waged between the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia [KSA] and Russia. A third concern, that of increasing financial stress, has been addressed and potentially allayed by the recent actions of the Fed. Since the beginning of March, the Fed has responded with the following, among other measures:

  • Cutting fed funds by 1.50% to 0.00%-0.25%;
  • Expanding its repo operations, effectively offering an unlimited amount;
  • Resuming Quantitative Easing as open-ended, announcing thee intention to buy $375 billion in Treasuries and $250 billion in mortgage-backed securities for the week of March 23 alone;
  • Supporting money market funds through the Money Market Mutual Fund Liquidity Facility, allowing banks to pledge collateral they purchase from prime money market funds.
  • Resurrecting the Primary Dealer Credit Facility, offering rates as low as 25 basis points to primary dealers with investment-grade debt, including municipals, and equities being used as collateral;
  • Encouraging bank lending by lowering the discount window rate to 25 basis points and extending the term to 90 days from overnight;
  • Relaxing regulatory capital requirements and liquidity buffers in an effort to stimulate lending;
  • Establishing two new facilities to support high-grade U.S. corporations: the Primary Market Corporate Credit Facility – allowing the Fed to buy new corporate bond issues and extending loans; and the Secondary Market Corporate Credit Facility – allowing purchases of not only existing corporate bonds, but also ETFs holding investment-grade rated bonds.

These historic measures by the Fed have the potential to avoid the issues associated with most prior recessions where the financial system exacerbated the problems.

Despite the Fed’s actions, the magnitude of the impact of COVID-19 on the economy remains to be seen. Due to the lag in data reporting, many indicators won’t turn decidedly negative until reports are released in April and May. However, we have noted a sudden decline in financial conditions as measured by the Bloomberg Financial Conditions Index for the U.S., which is compiled daily and comprises eight variables.[1] The more negative the reading, the greater the level of financial stress. It clearly indicates a substantial impact from the economic inactivity inflicted by the disease.

Our forecast is for a dramatic decline in U.S. GDP recorded for the second quarter of this year, with the potential to stretch into the third and fourth quarters should a second wave of the virus assert itself in autumn. However, over the full three-year forecast period, we anticipate that a U-shaped recovery will engage, accompanied by an unleashing of pent-up demand from businesses and households awash in liquidity.


[1] The eight variables contained in the index are the TED spread, LIBOR/OIS spread, commercial paper/T-bill spread, Baa/10-Year T-Note spread, Muni/10-Year T-Note spread, swap volatility, S&P 500 and VIX.

STOCK MARKET OUTLOOK

Although our near-term view is that domestic and overseas equity markets will be in search of new footing, we believe that in the absence of a policy mistake equity markets should recover over the course of our three-year forecast period. That is not to imply that in the interim all will be roses and buttercups for corporations and equity investors. The combination of the pandemic, the “oil war” between Russia and the KSA, and the global recession will naturally cripple corporate earnings. Our updated EPS estimate for the S&P 500 is $127 for 2020. A resurgence of the virus in autumn and/or a policy mistake, such as a failure to follow the $2 trillion stimulus bill with additional legislation in the event of a more severe and durable economic contraction, could plunge equity prices even lower. However, the policy responses thus far have been heartening.

The downturn may provide an opportunity for companies to write down some inflated assets, such as intangibles, and revise compensation structures to appease governance-focused institutional investors. In addition, share repurchase programs are likely to be curtailed, reducing this form of demand for shares, and in the near term, dividends may be suspended by a number of firms as they address the business impact over the next several months. However, over our forecast period, dividends are likely to become the preferred means by which to reward shareholders, thereby replacing share repurchases. Over the course of the next three years we anticipate that pent-up demand, the realignment of supply chains, and builds in corporate inventories will lead to a recovery in equity prices from today’s attractive valuations.

In summary, current pressures associated with COVID-19 and the oil war may continue to build over the next several months, placing more downward pressure on equities. However, we find valuations to be enticing, even factoring in a temporary plunge in EPS for this year. Accordingly, over our forecast period we believe that stocks hold remarkable appeal and will be viewed as such when we look in the rearview mirror in 2023.

Among U.S. equities, a tilt now exists in favor of growth over value and we increase the allocation to the quality factor focusing on profitability, earnings quality, and lower leverage. Within large cap sectors, we established an overweight to Consumer Discretionary, given expectations for performance once constrained demand from COVID-19 is revived, while maintaining the overweight to Technology and Communication Services.

In contrast, overseas developed markets hold lesser appeal, given the current and anticipated continued strength of the U.S. dollar. Until a durable catalyst for weakening the U.S. dollar becomes evident, the strategies will continue to exclude non-U.S. developed market exposure. For the more aggressive strategies, however, we find that emerging markets have largely discounted the effects of a strong dollar, COVID-19, and the oil war. Emerging markets ex-China are trading one-third lower than they were at the end of last year. Accordingly, we have introduced exposure to emerging markets in the higher risk strategies, Growth and Aggressive Growth.

BOND MARKET OUTLOOK

The extraordinary measures employed by the Fed have helped to ratchet down yields across the curve and thus far have effectively rescued the commercial paper and investment-grade corporate bond market. While these measures excluded the high-yield bond market, the stimulus package passed by Congress on March 27 provides the potential for remedy. Within the package is a tax carryback provision allowing companies to use losses incurred from 2018-2020 to offset profits from prior years. This may provide continued life support for a number of high-yield entities. As the chart shows, spreads for both investment-grade and high-yield corporate bonds rapidly widened over the course of the past month yet have declined over the past week due to both Fed intervention and anticipated assistance from the stimulus package.

While the Asset Allocation strategies benefited from employing long-term Treasuries as stabilizers through last quarter’s equity market turbulence, we find continued upside to be limited as there is a risk that the U.S. encounters a lift in inflation this summer from surging demand, which would pressure the long-end of the curve. The potential for an increase in rates over the full three-year forecast period encourages our substantial reduction of long-term bonds in the income-oriented strategies and their elimination from the Growth and Aggressive Growth strategies.

OTHER MARKETS

The combination of our forecast for rates and the significantly attractive pricing caused by the market decline leads to the continued exposure to REITs in the more conservative Income with Growth strategy. Although the office/retail segment will obviously struggle this year, the more diversified pool of REIT enterprises including data storage, cell towers, and timber lessens the impact retail and office formerly held.

We retain the prior elevated allocation to gold given its ability to offer a potential hedge against geopolitical risk. In the more risk-seeking strategies of Growth and Aggressive Growth, gold is complemented by small positions in silver, which we find can magnify the advantages of gold. Another potential advantage of silver is that roughly half of its demand is from industrial uses, which can be supportive of its price during an economic recovery.

View the complete PDF

Daily Comment (March 31, 2020)

by Bill O’Grady, Thomas Wash, and Patrick Fearon-Hernandez, CFA

[Posted: 9:30 AM EDT]

As March draws to a close today, we’re reminded of the old adage about the month: in like a lion, out like a lamb.  After what we’ve all gone through during the last month, we certainly hope for a day that’s as quiet and gentle as a lamb!  As always, we review all the key news on the coronavirus epidemic and related, market-relevant items.

COVID-19:  Official data show confirmed cases have risen to 801,400 worldwide, with 38,743 deaths and 172,657 recoveries.  In the United States, confirmed cases rose to 164,610, with 3,170 deaths and 5,945 recoveries (though the recovery data is lagging).  Here is the latest chart of infections from the Financial Times:

Global Oil Market:  Two major shale producers in the Permian Basin have asked Texas regulators to consider curtailing crude output in the state as the industry grapples with collapsing demand and plunging prices.  Meanwhile, poorer oil producers such as Iraq and Venezuela are being forced to consider steep budget cuts as low oil prices cut deeply into their revenues.

View the complete PDF

Weekly Geopolitical Report – Could the Coronavirus Pandemic Break Up the EU? – Part I (March 30, 2020)

by Patrick Fearon-Hernandez, CFA

In times of crisis, the future is a luxury.  Or, at least, thinking about the future can seem like a luxury, especially if you’re reeling from the death of a loved one, the loss of a job, the devastation of a retirement portfolio, or just the boredom and isolation of a quarantine.  Many people are overwhelmed with those challenges in the midst of the COVID-19 pandemic.  And yet the pandemic is changing the future course of the world in ways that we’ll all need to understand and respond to eventually.  Those future changes extend to politics and geopolitical relations.

In this report, we explore the recent signs suggesting the COVID-19 pandemic could potentially lead to a break-up of the European Union (EU).  In Part I, we examine the history of the EU, how it works, and the political and social fissures that undermine its stability.  In Part II next week, we will look at the recent policy moves by various EU countries that could lead to disintegration if carried too far.  We’ll wrap up with a discussion of the possible economic consequences of a break-up and the ramifications for investors.

View the full report

Daily Comment (March 30, 2020)

by Bill O’Grady, Thomas Wash, and Patrick Fearon-Hernandez, CFA

[Posted: 9:30 AM EDT]

Good morning and happy Monday!  Before we begin, we want to note a correction from our Friday comment; we erroneously reported the NHL had cancelled its season.[1]  That wasn’t true, and we apologize for any confusion.  Global equities are lower and oil prices are testing $20 per barrel.  However, U.S. equity futures are ticking higher.  We update all the COVID-19 news, including some charts on what is happening in the economy.  Here are the details:

COVID-19:  The official number of global cases is 735,560 with 34,830 fatalities and 156,380 recoveries.  There is growing skepticism over China’s numbers; this is especially pertinent given media reports that the U.S. now has more cases than China.  Here is the usual FT chart:

There is a recognizable “bend” developing in the U.S. infection rate.  That is potentially good news.

The virus news:

The policy news:

  • Congress and the White House are already preparing for “Phase 4” of the stimulus program. The general consensus is that the preceding measures will merely offer support to those affected by COVID-19 and act as a stopgap.  Restarting growth will be another matter.
  • Congress is “rearming” the Fed, boosting its ability to begin lending directly to businesses and local governments. These new powers are significant; one of the problems that hampered the response in 2008 was that the Fed pushed liquidity into the banking system, where it sat idle.  That led to calls among left-wing politicians for direct central bank support; in Britain, Jeremy Corbyn called for “QE for people.”  These new powers are a step in that direction—the Fed would be simply bypassing the financial system and putting money directly into the economy, à la MMT.  This development comes in the face of a severe testing of the U.S. social safety net.
  • The U.S. plans to suspend tariff collection for three months.
  • The next battle brewing could be in insurance. The industry is claiming that policies it has written specifically exclude pandemics; governments beg to differ.
  • Across the pond, there are a couple items of note. First, Italy’s widespread “off the books” labor market means that millions of workers will be excluded from government support measures.  And, there is a deep battle brewing in the Eurozone; a growing roster of nations, mostly in the south, are pressing for a Eurobond, a bond backed by the full faith and credit of the entire (read: Germany) Eurozone.  Needless to say, Germany and the Netherlands are opposed to such measures.  As we are reporting over the next two weeks in the WGR, the fracturing of the EU is becoming a geopolitical concern.

The economic news:

The market news:

  • Banks and other lenders are tightening lending standards as borrowing demand rises. Historically, lenders are pro-cyclical; they tend to increase lending in good times and withdraw it in bad times.  Unfortunately, this sort of behavior makes the recession worse.  Hence the entry of the Fed into direct lending.
  • There are three charts we want to note this morning. First, there has been a flight-to-government money market funds (IMMK) and away from prime funds.  During the 2008 Financial Crisis there was similar activity.  The second chart updates the retail MMK and S&P 500, while the third chart shows how foreign central banks are drawing the Fed’s swap lines.

In 2016, SEC regulations changed and allowed the NAV on MMK to deviate from $1.00 per share.  This change prompted a flight into government funds.  However, we did see a modest recovery in prime MMK until recently.  As financial stress has increased, so has the exodus from prime MMK.

Second, readers will be familiar with our retail MMK/S&P 500 chart, which is updated below.

When the trade war expanded in early 2018, retail investors began building cash positions.  This positioning accelerated despite the rally in stocks from Q2 2018 into February of this year.  But, as stocks have declined, MMK has risen sharply.

Third, the Fed’s forex swap lines are being drawn aggressively.

These swap lines are used by foreign central banks to provide dollars to their borrowers who have dollar-denominated debt.  As financial stress has increased, we have seen the dollar rally.  In 2008, the dollar weakened only after the draw on foreign currency swaps declined.

  • Oil prices continue to spiral lower. A couple news items of note.  First, the recently passed stimulus bill failed to include funding to purchase oil for the SPR.  Second, gasoline crack spreads, which is a rough measure of refining margins, have dipped under zero recently.  The chart below shows that a barrel of gasoline is trading below the cost of a barrel of oil.  If this continues much longer, we will likely see refining activity decline which will put additional pressure on prices.
(Source: Bloomberg)

Foreign policy news:

View the complete PDF


[1] One of the dangers of working from home is overhearing members of the household making unsubstantiated claims.  Going forward, we will rely on Ronald Reagan’s dictum of “trust but verify.”