Keller Quarterly (July 2023)

Letter to Investors | PDF

At least once a decade, the stock market vibrates with excitement over a new technology and, in this revelry, the stocks of any company close to that technology separate themselves from the rest of the market as a rocket separates itself from the ground. That remarkable upward surge in stock prices provides validation to speculators that they’re doing the right thing in paying exorbitant prices for these stocks. No analysis of business models, profit margins, capital structures, dividends, or (least of all) valuations are required. All that’s needed to justify the investment is to cite the name of the technology: “It’s artificial intelligence!” No other explanation is needed. Other speculators nod knowingly. “It’s a sure thing!”

Prior speculations were provided with similarly simple justifications. “It’s crypto-currency!” “It’s electric vehicles!” “It’s the internet!” “It’s mobile phones!” “It’s personal computers!” “It’s semiconductors!” “It’s plastics!” “It’s television!” “It’s radio!” “It’s the airplane!” “It’s the automobile!”

The ironic thing is that most, if not all, of these new speculation-sparking technologies really are transformational. They change the economy and society. What’s rarely remembered years later is how much capital was incinerated along the way as investors chased one “sure thing” after another. In 1908, there were 253 automobile manufacturers in the United States; by 1929, there were 44. Even among those 44 companies, General Motors, Ford, and Chrysler were making 80% of all cars in that year. Fifty years later, they were the only three left. Yes, some of the 250 other manufacturers were acquired, but the majority simply went out of business, leaving investors with nothing to show for their optimism.

Stock market analysts as old as I am can name dozens of defunct companies in all these transformational industries. You can probably think of a few crypto and EV companies that have already “bit the dust.” It’s hard enough to forecast which technologies are going to succeed financially; it’s much harder to figure out which companies in these lanes are going to both survive and prosper.

All too many people today believe that this is investing. To us, it is simply speculation: a level of risk that we deem unwise. I’ve often likened this manner of investing to wildcat drilling, that is, drilling lots of speculative holes in the ground, hoping that at least one proves to be a gusher and delivers enough of a return to more than compensate for all the dry holes. While that makes sense to some, we’ve never gone that route. If that gusher never comes in, you’re left with lots of lost money.

What makes much more sense to us is to invest in companies that are successful today, whose prospects for staying successful seem bright based on current developments, and whose management teams have proven to be effective in adapting to changing conditions. In other words, we want to invest in what is, not what if.

T.S. Eliot voiced similar thoughts (with infinitely greater eloquence):

What might have been and what has been

Point to one end, which is always present.

                                  (Burnt Norton, I, 9-10)

With investing, as with life, we can get lost if we live in the past or in the future. We live in neither; we live in the present, and thus we can only invest in the present. But isn’t investing about the future? Future returns, future cash flows, etc.? Yes, but we can’t go to the future and see what’s there. We must invest in the present, using the best available information and judgment we can bring to the decision. When the present changes, we can adjust our decisions. The problem with the future is that you can’t know if or when it will change.

Loeb Strauss emigrated from Bavaria to the U.S. in 1848 and joined his older brothers’ wholesale dry goods business in New York. A year later, gold was discovered in California. Unlike other 20- year-olds, Loeb wasn’t interested in chasing the prospect of maybe finding gold; he went to San Francisco to sell wholesale dry goods. He imported clothing, umbrellas, bolts of fabric, and other such stuff from his brothers in New York and sold them to local retailers. When one of his customers asked him to help patent a method for making pants out of Strauss’ denim by putting rivets at the points of stress, Loeb (now known by his nickname Levi) quickly agreed. The blue jean was born. Not many of the 300,000 people who went to California to find gold made a serious amount of money. Not only was Levi much more successful than the dream-followers, but his business also survives to this day.

We like the example of Levi Strauss, who invested in the present rather than speculating on the future.

We appreciate your confidence in us.

 

Gratefully,

Mark A. Keller, CFA
CEO and Chief Investment Officer

View PDF

Bi-Weekly Geopolitical Report – The 2023 Mid-Year Geopolitical Outlook: The Polycrisis (July 10, 2023)

Bill O’Grady, Thomas Wash, and Patrick Fearon-Hernandez, CFA | PDF

As is our custom, we update our geopolitical outlook for the remainder of the year as the first half comes to a close.  This report is less a series of predictions as it is a list of potential geopolitical issues that we believe will dominate the international landscape for the rest of the year.

We have subtitled this report “The Polycrisis” to reflect the complicated and multifaceted geopolitical world that is rapidly evolving.  The number of issues we cover here is much greater than our usual mid-year update, but we felt that all these matters were important enough to mention.  They are listed in order of importance.

Issue #1: Russian Political Instability

Issue #2: Ukraine’s Military Prospects

Issue #3: China Navigating Great Power Relations

Issue #4: China’s Youth Unemployment

Issue #5: China’s Debt Problem

Issue #6: U.S. Superpower Status and Fracturing Domestic Consensus

Issue #7: Re-Industrialization

Issue #8: Climate Change and Great Power Competition

Issue #9: The Problem with Mexico

Issue #10: Artificial Intelligence

Issue #11: EU vs. Poland and Hungary

Issue #12: Middle East Realignment

Issue #13: Iranian Nuclear Breakout

Issue #14: Emerging Market Debt

Read the full report

Don’t miss our accompanying podcasts, available on our website and most podcast platforms: Apple | Spotify | Google
The podcast episode for this particular edition is posted under the Confluence of Ideas series.

Weekly Energy Update (July 6, 2023)

by Bill O’Grady, Thomas Wash, and Patrick Fearon-Hernandez, CFA | PDF

Despite OPEC+ promises to cut production, oil remains in a $67 to $74 per barrel trading range.

(Source: Barchart.com)

Commercial crude oil inventories fell 1.5 mb, which was on forecast.  The SPR fell 1.5 mb, putting the total draw at 3.0 mb.

In the details, U.S. crude oil production rose 0.2 mbpd to 12.4 mbpd.  Exports fell 1.4 mbpd, while imports rose 0.5 mbpd.  Refining activity declined 1.1% to 91.1% of capacity.

(Sources: DOE, CIM)

The above chart shows the seasonal pattern for crude oil inventories.  After accumulating oil inventory at a rapid pace into mid-February, injections first slowed and then declined.  This week’s draw is consistent with seasonal norms.  The seasonal pattern would suggest that stocks should fall in the coming weeks, but this pattern has become less reliable due to export flows.

Fair value, using commercial inventories and the EUR for independent variables, yields a price of $61.81.  Commercial inventory levels are a bearish factor for oil prices, but with the unprecedented withdrawal of SPR oil, we think that the total-stocks number is more relevant.

Since the SPR is being used, to some extent, as a buffer stock, we have constructed oil inventory charts incorporating both the SPR and commercial inventories.  With another round of SPR sales set to happen, the combined storage data will again be important.

Total stockpiles peaked in 2017 and are now at levels last seen in 2002.  Using total stocks since 2015, fair value is $94.69.

Market News:

Geopolitical News:

Alternative Energy/Policy News:

(Source: Axios)

  View PDF

Business Cycle Report (June 29, 2023)

by Thomas Wash | PDF

The business cycle has a major impact on financial markets; recessions usually accompany bear markets in equities.  The intention of this report is to keep our readers apprised of the potential for recession, updated on a monthly basis.  Although it isn’t the final word on our views about recession, it is part of our process in signaling the potential for a downturn.

The Confluence Diffusion Index improved slightly in May but continues to signal that a recession is close. The latest report showed that six out of 11 benchmarks are in contraction territory. The diffusion index rose from -0.3333 to -0.2121 but still sits well below the contraction signal of +0.2500.

  • Equities rebounded despite financial conditions remaining tight.
  • Residential construction spiked but the goods-producing sector remains weak.
  • Labor markets appear to be strong but the number of unemployed workers is starting to climb.

The chart above shows the Confluence Diffusion Index. It uses a three-month moving average of 11 leading indicators to track the state of the business cycle. The red line signals when the business cycle is headed toward a contraction, while the blue line signals when the business cycle is in recovery. The diffusion index currently provides about six months of lead time for a contraction and five months of lead time for recovery. Continue reading for an in-depth understanding of how the indicators are performing. At the end of the report, the Glossary of Charts describes each chart and its measures. In addition, a chart title listed in red indicates that the index is signaling recession.

Read the full report

Weekly Energy Update (June 29, 2023)

by Bill O’Grady, Thomas Wash, and Patrick Fearon-Hernandez, CFA | PDF

Oil prices may be establishing a new trading range between $67 and $75 per barrel.

(Source: Barchart.com)

Commercial crude oil inventories fell 9.6 mb when compared to the forecast draw of 1.3 mb.  The SPR fell 1.4 mb, putting the total draw at 11.0 mb.

In the details, U.S. crude oil production was steady at 12.2 mbpd.  Exports rose 0.8 mbpd, while imports rose 0.4 mbpd.  Refining activity declined 0.9% to 92.2% of capacity.

(Sources: DOE, CIM)

The above chart shows the seasonal pattern for crude oil inventories.  After accumulating oil inventory at a rapid pace into mid-February, injections first slowed and then declined.  This week’s draw is consistent with seasonal norms.  The seasonal pattern would suggest that stocks should fall in the coming weeks, but this pattern has become less reliable due to export flows.

Fair value, using commercial inventories and the EUR for independent variables, yields a price of $61.31.  Commercial inventory levels are a bearish factor for oil prices, but with the unprecedented withdrawal of SPR oil, we think that the total-stocks number is more relevant.

Since the SPR is being used, to some extent, as a buffer stock, we have constructed oil inventory charts incorporating both the SPR and commercial inventories.  With another round of SPR sales set to happen, the combined storage data will again be important.

Total stockpiles peaked in 2017 and are now at levels last seen in 2002.  Using total stocks since 2015, fair value is $94.62.

Market News:

  • The Dallas Fed data shows slowing activity in shale drilling. Rig counts have been falling and firms are reducing investment in production.
  • OPEC+ is trying to woo Guyana into the cartel. So far, the South American nation has fended off the invitation.  The government argues that with oil demand set to decline over time, the country needs to maximize revenue in the short run; thus, producing to a quota may harm that effort.
  • From the 1970s into the late 1990s, the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia’s (KSA) rank as foreign supplier of oil to the U.S. was a reliable signal for the market. If the Saudis’ position fell below second place, within a few months, the Saudis would tend to flood the market with oil to maintain dominance of the U.S. oil market.  The shale revolution ended that relationship, but we are watching closely to see if a similar pattern develops with the China market.  It will be more difficult to establish the foreign rank given China’s tendency to control information, but we would not be surprised to see foreign oil producers try to become the largest supplier to China.  Thus, we note with interest the reports that Russia is gaining share in China.  This development could end the KSA’s recent thrust to raise oil prices via unilateral production cuts.
  • As a heat wave develops in the Pacific Northwest, a county in Oregon is suing fossil fuel companies. Although we doubt this action will have any effect, it does suggest a vulnerability for energy producers.
  • China is aggressively expanding its petrochemical capacity, leading to a glut of product on global markets. Meanwhile, there is new investment in this industry in the KSA as well.

Geopolitical News:

  • News of the Russian “coup” dominated last weekend, but for the oil markets, it’s not obvious if it will make much difference. Although there are many articles suggesting Putin is finished, we will wait and see.  Chaos in Russia would be bullish for oil prices but, in the short run, not much has changed for oil flows.
  • New research shows how geopolitical insecurity is leading China to stockpile oil and expand relations with oil and gas producers. The research suggests that insecurity of supply is driving policy.
  • There is increasing evidence that the KSA is engaging in energy policies designed to harm the U.S. For example, the U.S. will see the largest export reductions tied to the KSA’s decision to cut oil production.
  • The KSA is sending high-ranking officials to China’s “Summer Davos,” or formally, the Annual Meeting of New Champions. The decision highlights the Saudis’ close relations with Beijing.
  • The latest on the Nord Stream sabotage is that Ukrainian operatives based this action in Poland. If true, it complicates inter-EU relations with Germany.
  • Russian product sales are being facilitated by European trading firms.

Alternative Energy/Policy News:

  View PDF