Daily Comment (April 7, 2020)

by Bill O’Grady, Thomas Wash, and Patrick Fearon-Hernandez, CFA

[Posted: 9:30 AM EDT]

After yesterday’s strong market action, investors are again in risk-on mode based on optimism that the coronavirus pandemic may be peaking.  We report on all the key developments relating to the virus as well as building pressure for a cut in oil production and Chinese use of the pandemic as cover for more mischief in the South China Sea.

COVID-19:  Official data show confirmed cases have risen to 1,362,936 worldwide, with 76,373 deaths and 292,188 recoveries.  In the United States, confirmed cases rose to 368,449, with 10,993 deaths and 19,919 recoveries (though the recovery data is lagging).  Here is the chart of infections now being published by the Financial Times:

Virology

Real Economy

Financial Markets

U.S. Fiscal Policy Response

U.S. Monetary Policy Response

Foreign Fiscal Policy Response

Political Fallout

Global Oil Market:  Ahead of Thursday’s virtual meeting between OPEC, Russia, and other major oil producers to address the Saudi-Russia price war, Saudi Arabia and its OPEC partners are warning that global storage capacity will soon be completely full and prices could fall further.  The warning aims to put pressure on Russia and other major producers, including the U.S. and Canada, to cut output on Saudi terms in order to support prices.

United States-China:  The U.S. State Department has issued a statement condemning China for using one of its coast guard ships to ram and sink a Vietnamese fishing boat in a disputed area of the South China Sea last week.  The incident suggests China is again trying to assert its sovereignty over the region while the world’s attention is diverted by the coronavirus pandemic.

View the complete PDF

Weekly Geopolitical Report – Could the Coronavirus Pandemic Break Up the EU? – Part II (April 6, 2020)

by Patrick Fearon-Hernandez, CFA

(Note: Due to the Easter holiday, our next report will be published on April 20.)

In Part I of this report we examined the history of the European Union (EU), how it works, and the political, economic, and social fissures that had already rendered it unstable when the COVID-19 pandemic took hold.  This week, we look at several recent policy moves that various EU countries have taken in response to the pandemic, and we explain why those policy moves could potentially push the EU over the tipping point toward disintegration if they are carried too far.  As always, we’ll wrap up with a discussion of the possible economic consequences of a break-up and the ramifications for investors.

The Temptation to Barricade
As we discussed in Part I, the founders of the EU believed that preventing another major war on European soil could be accomplished, in part, by an “ever-closer union among the peoples of Europe.”  The EU is often seen mostly as an economic arrangement (i.e., a customs union coupled with a free-trade area), but its founding principles are broader than that.  The EU aspires to the free movement of virtually all people, goods, services, and capital.  Unfortunately, the COVID-19 pandemic has tempted EU leaders to erect barriers in these areas.

View the full report

Daily Comment (April 6, 2020)

by Bill O’Grady, Thomas Wash, and Patrick Fearon-Hernandez, CFA

[Posted: 9:30 AM EDT]

Happy Monday!  Global equities are rising on hopes that the pandemic is stabilizing.  We update the COVID-19 news.  Here are the details:

COVID-19:  The official number of global cases is 1,280,046, with 69,789 fatalities and 265,462 recoveries.  Here is the updated FT chart:

We have received requests for a chart weighted by population.  We found this one yesterday.

Note that Japan’s numbers are rising at a slow pace but showing no signs of “bending.”  We suspect the recent action to declare a limited state of emergency (see below) is due to worries that an exponential rise may be in the offing.

The virus news:

The policy news:

  • Our position has been that the COVID-19 recession would be historically deep in terms of magnitude but short in duration. That belief was based on the expectation that policymakers would move quickly to support the economy and virus suppression efforts would relax by autumn.  Like all our forecasts, they are always subject to re-evaluation.  We have three immediate concerns:
  • Meanwhile, Germany continues to push back against a Eurobond, instead calling for more emergency lending. If this continues, the Eurozone will be in grave danger.
  • The UN is warning that it is facing a budget crunch due to spending on COVID-19.

The economic news:

  • One observation from Friday’s March employment report is that there was significant divergence between the payroll survey and the household survey with reference to employment.  As most of you are aware, the employment report consists of two different surveys, one gathered from employers and the other from households.  The employer survey is where the non-farm payrolls number is generated.  The household report is where the unemployment rate comes from.  The two numbers often diverge; the payroll report will capture those working at traditional businesses, while the household report is better at capturing sole proprietors and gig workers.  In March, payrolls fell 976k; employment from the household survey plunged 2.9 million.  The household survey is sobering, suggesting conditions are much worse than they look.

The market news:

  • Oil prices plunged overnight on news that a spat between Russia and the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia (KSA) has delayed today’s scheduled meeting on output reduction. The meeting will be held on Thursday.  We have seen prices rally off the lows as the market is betting that a deal will be made at some point.  However, the fact that a “you started it; no, you started it” fight between adult leaders of Russia and the KSA has led to a delay is a clear indication that managing these egos will be a challenge.
  • Meanwhile, President Trump has backed away from his threat to implement tariffs on oil. Although such ideas have been circulating for some time, it is important to note that a tariff might not be all that effective in propping up prices.  Assume the U.S. puts a $10 per barrel tariff on imported oil.  Foreign prices will likely fall in response, but perhaps even more importantly the dollar will soar.  The dollar strength will have unintended consequences for the global financial system.  If the government wants to support oil producers (after all, why should any government outside of OPEC want higher oil prices), a better tactic would be to do what we do for farmers.  Simply set a price for oil and pay oil companies the difference between the world price and the desired price.  Although this would require a massive “spend” of political capital, we could see it as part of a stimulus bill.
  • So, will we get a deal or not? We suspect that a deal will be struck and will likely collapse in short order.  Both Russia and the KSA want a wide agreement with other producers to prevent the loss of market share.  However, any reading of cartel behavior shows that the larger the cartel, the less likely it is that it will avoid free riders.
  • One interesting piece of evidence on how much oil demand has declined: air quality around the world is showing remarkable improvement.
  • One fallout from the virus is that Chinese household borrowing is slowing rapidly, and bad debt is rising.

View the complete PDF

Asset Allocation Weekly (April 3, 2020)

by Asset Allocation Committee

Earlier this year and late last year we recorded a series of podcast episodes that examined the issue of making decisions under conditions of uncertainty.  Episode #5 discussed the issue in broad terms, offering a general framework for examining such decisions.  In the end, the key to making these decisions comes down to process.  Without a sound process, decision makers can swing wildly on new information or take unconsidered risks.  In Episode #6, Mark Keller discussed this topic with a specific focus on how we make decisions in equity portfolio management.  In Episode #9, Greg Ellston did the same for asset allocation.

Recently, the Asset Allocation Committee met to make portfolio adjustments.  In the nearly two decades of being involved in such procedures, the current environment is perhaps the most unique for all members of the committee.  Simply put, we are in an area of substantial uncertainty.  The term “uncertainty” is not used lightly; we view the word in the sense analyzed by Frank Knight in his seminal work, Risk, Uncertainty and Profit.  Risk is where known probabilities can be assigned; games of chance such as roulette fall into the category.  Uncertainty occurs when probabilities cannot be accurately assigned.  That is the world in which most portfolio management decisions are made.

In our recent reallocation, which is detailed in the Asset Allocation Quarterly, our general position is that the economy is almost certainly in recession, but financial markets have already discounted much of the damage of a downturn.  Unlike most recessions, which occur due to policy error, geopolitical event, or inflation, this one is caused by a pandemic, which has almost no modern historical parallels.  We have seen extreme and severe market moves already; the decline in equities is one of the fastest on record.  New low yields have been established for long-duration Treasuries.  Credit spreads have widened to levels not seen since the Great Financial Crisis.  The key issue the committee had to determine was the likelihood that conditions would worsen beyond what the financial markets had already discounted.  Our determination was that the odds that market conditions could get worse is possible but less likely than the prospect that much of the bad news is already factored into asset prices.  That doesn’t mean that some element of caution isn’t appropriate but establishing the best positions to reduce portfolio risk is critical.

There were three themes that we applied to the asset allocation portfolio changes:

  1. The sharp decline in long-duration Treasury yields reduces the utility of this asset class in reducing portfolio risk. Our earlier position in this asset class has served our asset allocation portfolios well, but the utility was deemed to be near exhaustion.  There were two reasons for this determination.  First, the expansion of the Federal Reserve’s balance sheet will tend to raise inflation fears and thus slow further declines in long-dated Treasury yields.  Second, the Fed’s actions to narrow credit spreads will offer better opportunities in investment-grade credit.  To that end, we shortened duration and increased corporate bond exposure.
  2. The massive expansion of liquidity should favor precious metals. Although the dollar has been very strong due to the global scramble for dollars to service foreign-issued, dollar-denominated debt, the Fed has opened swap lines and other programs to improve global dollar liquidity.  We expect these actions to temper the dollar eventually.  The importance of gold as a portfolio hedge remains in place.  An allocation to silver was introduced in the Growth and Aggressive Growth strategies.
  3. We adjusted the portfolios regarding risk tolerance. Historically, steep declines in equities coupled with policy support have generally led to eventual recoveries in equities.  There was an increase in equity exposure across all the strategies with the largest increases seen in the Growth and Aggressive Growth strategies.  In these higher risk-tolerance portfolios, we added an allocation to emerging markets, which have fallen precipitously in this downturn.

Our CIO (and CEO) Mark Keller is fond of saying “we are not soothsayers, but oddsmakers.”  We are not predicting with certainty that the bottom in equities is in place or that credit won’t deteriorate further.  But, what we have seen from policymakers and our own analysis of how we believe the COVID-19 virus and the response will evolve over time leads us to the conclusion that the aforementioned three points are reasonable responses to current conditions.

View the PDF

Daily Comment (April 3, 2020)

by Bill O’Grady, Thomas Wash, and Patrick Fearon-Hernandez, CFA

[Posted: 9:30 AM EDT]

Happy Friday!  It’s employment Friday, although this may be one of the most irrelevant reports ever.  Since the survey is conducted around the 10th of the month, much of the jump in claims won’t be reflected in this report.  But, our quick take is that the weakness was profound as payrolls plunged 701k and the unemployment rate jumped to 4.4%; we have the details below.  We update the COVID-19 news.  Global stocks are under pressure, while oil makes a historic rally.  Here are the details:

COVID-19:  The official number of global cases is 1,030,628, with 54,137 fatalities and 218,771 recoveries.

The virus news:

The policy news:

The chart shows that for the month ending March 20, $32 billion has left investment grade.  The past two weeks have been far worse.  A net $560 billion of corporate debt has been downgraded, with $97 billion now officially fallen angels.

  • The Fed’s various support programs purposely exclude high yield. Bill Dudley, the former NY FRB president, recently argued that the Fed should not include such bonds on the basis of moral hazard.  We understand the sentiment but would argue that now is not the time to enforce market discipline because it is very difficult to know which debtor will trigger systemic problems and which won’t.
  • We have been generally optimistic, all things considered, because of the aggressive policy response. Although we remain so, we are worried that the combination of the lack of execution and short-sighted reluctance to support all borrowers will trigger unanticipated negative outcomes.  To quote the recently departed Kenny Rogers, “…there will be time enough for countin’ when the dealin’s done.”
  • Another area to watch is mortgages; defaults are almost certain to spike, and we doubt the nation would tolerate another response like we saw after the Great Financial Crisis.
  • Members of the FOMC are pressing for more fiscal stimulus.

The economic news:

  • As we continue to digest the incoming U.S. economic data and how it’s starting to reflect COVID-19, we think it’s important to emphasize that the March ISM Manufacturing Index released this week probably overstated the health of the factory sector.  The overall index fell to 49.1 in March, only modestly below the 50 level that indicates expansion, and not dramatically weaker than the readings of 50.1 in February and 50.9 in January. The figure for March was actually above every reading from August through December 2019.  The problem is that the overall figure is the average of five subindexes (new orders, production, employment, supplier deliveries, and inventories), and the subindex on supplier deliveries has been distorting the overall number for several months running.  That subindex measures how long it takes for manufacturers to get their supplies delivered once they’ve placed their orders, with the idea that delayed deliveries are a sign of high demand and strong factory activity.  When the subindex is higher, it means more manufacturers are experiencing delayed deliveries.  The problem is that the recent high numbers for the subindex are more a reflection of supply chain disruptions from last year’s trade war and this year’s virus shutdowns rather than high demand or strong manufacturing activity.  Excluding the distorted supplier delivery subindex from the calculation, the overall ISM Manufacturing Index for March would have been just 45.2, its lowest reading since May 2009.  That’s additional evidence that the economy has now slipped into a deep contraction.  Since the virus shutdowns are sure to keep the subindex on supplier deliveries high over at least the next couple of months, we’ll continue to focus on our adjusted measure of the ISM index to get a better sense of how the factory sector is faring.

  • The chart above shows how the ISM Manufacturing Index, if computed excluding the subindex on supplier deliveries, is now at its lowest level since late in the Great Recession of 2008-2009.
  • We are seeing a steady stream of reports of layoffs, buyouts, and furloughs. We are also seeing reports of wage cuts to maintain employment.

The market news:

  • The key market news is oil. Prices leaped yesterday on reports that President Trump had engineered a meeting of OPEC and Russia with tentative promises of production cuts.  Prices are higher this morning on reports that OPEC+ will hold a virtual meeting on Monday to discuss output reductions.
  • It appears the KSA is trying to get as broad of a group as possible to agree to reductions. This makes sense.  The wider the agreement, the better the chances of success…with one caveat.  Cartels always suffer from free riders.  Although all participants benefit from output constraints, an individual member has a great incentive to cheat.  We do expect some sort of deal on Monday, with promises of 10.0 mbpd of production cuts.  We do not expect cuts of this magnitude to be achieved.  At best, 3.0 to 5.0 mbpd is about all that can be expected, and we seriously doubt Russia will actually cut anything.  Failing to make any sort of deal at this meeting would be a disaster but it would be naïve to expect that compliance will be anywhere near what is promised.  This doesn’t mean a deal won’t have an impact; if the KSA doesn’t raise output to 12.0 mbpd, we probably avoid single-digit oil prices.  But, even with a deal, demand destruction is still a reality and prices in the $20s will be with us for a while.
  • Add this industry to others that have found fortune in the era of COVID-19.

Foreign policy:

View the complete PDF


[1] A fallen angel is an investment-grade bond that has been downgraded to junk status and can no longer be held in an investment-grade bond portfolio.

Daily Comment (April 2, 2020)

by Bill O’Grady, Thomas Wash, and Patrick Fearon-Hernandez, CFA

[Posted: 9:30 AM EDT]

Good morning!  After a drubbing yesterday, we are seeing a rebound in global markets this morning.  One of the factors helping sentiment is a 10% jump in crude oil prices.  The White House is continuing to talk to Russia and the KSA, and the president is meeting with energy executives.  However, Moscow has indicated it won’t change its policy anytime soon.  China announced it is buying oil for its strategic reserves.  Linked here is our updated Weekly Energy Update.  We update all the COVID-19 news, including some charts on what is happening in the economy.  Here are the details:

COVID-19:  The official number of global cases is 951,901 with 48,284 fatalities and 202,342 recoveries.  The FT did not issue an infection chart; we will try to find one for tomorrow.

The virus news:

The policy news:

The economic news:

  • Initial claims jumped to 6.65 million, a new record. We cover the data below.  There has been a surge in layoffs reported recently and the data confirm it.
  • We are seeing a surge in worker revolt. Production workers, delivery drivers, health care workers, warehouse employees, and grocery clerks are starting to push back against what they see are unsafe working conditions.  They have high leverage at this moment.

The market news:

Foreign policy:

Iran:  There are reports that Iran is planning attacks on U.S. military bases in Iraq.  The U.S. is warning Tehran against such actions.

View the complete PDF

Weekly Energy Update (April 2, 2020)

by Bill O’Grady, Thomas Wash, and Patrick Fearon-Hernandez, CFA

Crude oil inventories rose 13.0 mb compared to the forecast rise of 3.5 mb.

In the details, U.S. crude oil production was unchanged at 13.0 mbpd.  Exports fell 0.7 mbpd, while imports declined 0.1 mbpd.  Refining activity fell 5.0%, well more than the 0.1% decline forecast.  The inventory build was due to a combination of falling exports and a severe decline in refinery operations.

(Sources: DOE, CIM)

The above chart shows the annual seasonal pattern for crude oil inventories.  This week’s report has lifted stockpiles well above seasonal norms.  Although not totally unexpected, this is the first week where the impact of COVID-19 and the oil war has started to affect the weekly data.

Based on our oil inventory/price model, fair value is $50.98; using the euro/price model, fair value is $48.95.  The combined model, a broader analysis of the oil price, generates a fair value of $48.59.  Usually, the fair value from the combined model falls within the values generated by the individual models.  Recent volatility has led to some model instability, so the combined model is generating the lowest forecast price.  As we noted recently, the model output is less relevant unless Russia and the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia (KSA) come to an agreement on supply.

In the coming weeks, there are two key factors we will be monitoring.  First, we will start looking at the impact of the virus on demand.  This week, we are seeing the first signs that the virus has affected product demand.  The chart below shows the four-week average of gasoline supplied to the distribution system.  As the chart shows, shipments have cratered.  Distillate demand is holding up better, reflecting the increases in delivery of goods.

We also note that refinery activity is rolling over.

This sort of decline is usually seen during severe weather events, such as hurricanes.  The COVID-19 crisis will almost certainly last longer and thus will negatively impact crude oil consumption.

Second, estimated primary U.S. commercial crude oil storage is around 510.0 mb.  An additional 110.0 mb is available at refineries and in pipelines.  The total capacity of the Strategic Petroleum Reserve (SPR) is 713.5 mb, of which 635 mb is already being utilized, meaning there is an additional 77.5 mb.  Once primary storage is filled, secondary storage will be utilized.  However, it tends to have a higher cost and is less accessible than primary storage.  Producers fund storage costs via the calendar spreads in crude oil.  When the spread is positive, they produce oil today to sell in the future.  Currently, producers can earn $4 per barrel by producing oil now and selling it six months into the future.  The chart below shows the rolling six-month crude oil calendar spread.

Since mid-2013, the correlation between the six-month calendar spread and oil inventories has been at 74.6%, with the spread leading inventories by two months.  The current spread suggests that oil inventories will rise at least another 10 mb over the next two months.

Adding to inventory pressure are two other factors.  First, rising U.S. crude oil exports have been a key factor in reducing U.S. crude oil inventories.  As OPEC+Russia boost output and exports, it will be difficult for exports to be maintained.  If exports decline, that crude oil will need to be stored.

On the international front, so far, the U.S. has had little success in getting either Russia or the KSA to back away from their adversarial positions.  The KSA is poised to dramatically ramp up output.  The U.S. is considering easing Iranian sanctions due to COVID-19.

On the domestic front, the White House is considering restricting oil imports in a bid to protect domestic producers.  Texas regulators are reopening the debate on having the Texas Railroad Commission return to its role of regulating oil production.  Although Congress did not include funding for SPR purchases, the White House is considering a program to allow firms to lease the SPR for additional storage.

In conclusion, the current market fundamentals are about as bearish as we have ever seen.  It will take significant government and OPEC intervention to stop the downdraft.  History suggests that such actions rarely occur until prices reach unfathomable levels.  Although we are friendly to a number of different asset classes, oil isn’t one of them.  Somewhere between now and Labor Day, some sort of resolution is likely, but it probably gets much worse before it improves.

View the PDF

Daily Comment (April 1, 2020)

by Bill O’Grady, Thomas Wash, and Patrick Fearon-Hernandez, CFA

[Posted: 9:30 AM EDT]

Happy April Fool’s Day!  But please don’t expect any foolishness here!  As always, we soberly review the latest U.S. projections on the course of the COVID-19 pandemic, which have rattled the markets so far this morning.  We also note the Fed has come out of the closet as the world’s central bank (see detailed discussion below), while Europe continues to struggle with a way to support its economy.

COVID-19:  Official data show confirmed cases have risen to 874,081 worldwide, with 43,537 deaths and 185,194 recoveries.  In the United States, confirmed cases rose to 189,633, with 4,081 deaths and 7,136 recoveries (though the recovery data is lagging).  Here is the main chart of infections now being published by the Financial Times:

  • Real Economy.  IHS Markit said its final March PMI for the Eurozone manufacturing sector came in at a seasonally adjusted 44.5, modestly lower than the flash estimate of 44.8 and the final February reading of 49.2 (see data tables below).  In the U.K., the IHS Markit/CIPS manufacturing PMI fell to a three-month low of 47.8 in March versus 51.7 in February.  As with all major PMIs, readings under 50 point to falling activity.
  • Financial System.  In a welcome sign that the junk bond market may be stabilizing after seizing up in early March, junk bond prices have improved a bit this week.  At least two major firms have also been able to float riskier debt.  Below-investment grade obligations are still trading at elevated spreads over U.S. Treasuries, but the improved market dynamics suggest that aggressive fiscal and monetary policy may have turned the tide.  All the same:
  • U.S. Monetary Policy Response.  Launching yet another new rescue program, the Fed said it will temporarily allow approximately 170 foreign central banks and international monetary authorities to borrow dollars by pledging the U.S. Treasuries they hold at the New York FRB.  The new “FIMA Repo Facility” will supplement the currency swap facilities already in place with more than a dozen major central banks.  Amid the global scramble for dollars touched off by the coronavirus crisis, the Fed said a key aim of the facility is to give foreign central banks access to the dollars they need without forcing them into disruptive sales of their Treasury holdings.  The facility will likely be considered especially helpful for smaller emerging markets, though China was probably the key country under consideration.  In a broader sense, the facility may be one of the most radical, risky, and controversial of the Fed’s many moves to counter the crisis as it amounts to a full, unabashed embrace of being the world’s central bank or the global lender of last resort.  That role is clearly at odds with the broader U.S. trend toward deglobalization, and it is out of sync with the administration’s policy of withdrawing from the traditional U.S. role as global hegemon.
  • Foreign Fiscal Policy Response.  The EU continues to struggle to come up with fiscal programs that can cushion the blow from the crisis without generating pushback from the northern creditor members.

View the complete PDF

IDEA Dividend Update (March 31, 2020)

A Report from the Value Equities Investment Committee | PDF

Growing dividends are at the core of Confluence’s Increasing Dividend Equity Account (IDEA) strategy. Given the unprecedented nature of a national economic shutdown to combat COVID-19, it is likely that many companies, including some that may be held in the IDEA portfolio, will choose to not grow their dividends and some may even choose to temporarily suspend or decrease their dividends during the economic shutdown. With this possibility in mind we thought it would be helpful to proactively discuss the situation and our planned response prior to any changes companies might make with their dividends.

Why are growing dividends beneficial?

First, it would probably be helpful to review why owning companies with growing dividends is a good investment strategy. When you purchase a stock, you are buying a fractional portion of a company with the expectation of receiving a share of its ongoing cash flow. Each year a company’s earnings (cash flow) may be used to reinvest to grow the company, repurchase shares, pay dividends to the owners, or possibly do all three.

Over the long term, a stock’s total return will be determined by the cash flow growth and dividends paid out to the owners. As a result, a company with a history of consistent and growing dividends indicates a company with consistent and growing cash flow – a recipe for good long-term investment returns.

The team at Confluence has a long track record of identifying and investing in companies that not only have histories of growing dividends but also have solid prospects that those dividends should continue to grow well into the future.

Why would a company temporarily suspend or decrease its dividend in the current environment?

Read the full report