Weekly Energy Update (May 14, 2020)

by Bill O’Grady, Thomas Wash, and Patrick Fearon-Hernandez, CFA

Here is an updated crude oil price chart.  The oil market continues to show signs of recovery.

(Source: Barchart.com)

Crude oil inventories surprised the markets by falling 0.7 mb compared to the forecast rise of 5.0 mb.

In the details, U.S. crude oil production fell 0.3 mbpd to 11.6 mbpd.  Exports were unchanged, while imports fell 0.3 mbpd.  Refining activity fell 2.6%, when a modest rise was expected.

So, why the unexpected inventory draw?

Unaccounted for crude oil is a balancing item in the weekly energy balance sheet.  To make the data balance, this line item is a plug figure; but that doesn’t mean it doesn’t matter.  This week’s number of 914 kbpd is the largest negative number on record.  It may mean that in the scramble for finding storage, some oil is being inventoried outside the survey system.  In other words, over the week, some 6.4 mb of crude oil went into storage somewhere, just not where it can be recorded.  This explanation would be consistent with the build seen in the API data.  Or, production is falling much faster than the DOE estimates are capturing so there aren’t any missing barrels; simply put, production is cratering.  We are leaning toward the first explanation, but if inventories don’t rise in the coming weeks the second theory would become more plausible.  The second factor is that the SPR rose 1.9 mb as some of the oil went into the strategic reserve.

(Source: Barchart.com)

The above chart shows the annual seasonal pattern for crude oil inventories.  This week’s data, with the caveats expressed in the discussion about the unaccounted-for crude oil, suggests the worst of the inventory accumulation is behind us.

Based on our oil inventory/price model, fair value is $29.17; using the euro/price model, fair value is $44.14.  The combined model, a broader analysis of the oil price, generates a fair value of $36.98.  As we noted recently, the model output is less relevant as there is a non-linearity tied to the loss of storage capacity that cannot be fully captured with these models.  At the same time, if storage remains available, the models would suggest upside for oil prices.  We also note that the Eurozone could be roiled by German court decisions that might limit the flexibility of the ECB to support the Eurozone economy.  This outcome would be bearish for the euro and may weaken it further, which would be bearish for oil prices.

Although consumption remains depressed, gasoline data does show improvement.  Some data tracking does suggest an upswing in driving activity.

The news for the week was mixed.  On the positive side for oil prices, the UAE announced production cutbacks.  The DOE’s short-term forecast indicated that demand should start to recover and supplies should fall as the year progresses.  On the negative front, OPEC cut its crude oil demand forecast for 2020 by 2.0 mbpd.  Oil CEOs are warning that oil may be witnessing peak demand.

On the geopolitical front, Iran’s Khuzestan province is implementing social distancing to thwart a rise in COVID-19 infections.  Iran has been breaking U.S. sanctions, sending oil to Syria and oil equipment to Venezuela.  U.S. sanctions are reducing funding for Iranian proxies and forces in Syria.  Saudi Arabia is being forced to implement austerity measures to deal with the drop in oil prices.  Finally, the U.S. has pulled Patriot missile batteries from Saudi Arabia.

View the PDF

Daily Comment (May 13, 2020)

by Bill O’Grady, Thomas Wash, and Patrick Fearon-Hernandez, CFA

[Posted: 9:30 AM EDT]

The general rise in today’s markets comes as multiple countries and states continue to ease their coronavirus restrictions and Democrats in the House released their proposal for another round of fiscal relief, but optimism remains tempered by health officials’ warnings against easing too quickly and signs of increasing tensions between the U.S. and China.  As always, we review the key pandemic and related news below.

COVID-19:  Official data show confirmed cases have risen to 4,283,885 worldwide, with 292,619 deaths and 1,504,429 recoveries.  In the United States, confirmed cases rose to 1,370,016, with 82,389 deaths and 230,087 recoveries.  Here is the interactive chart from the Financial Times that allows you to compare cases and deaths among countries, scaled by population.

Virology

Real Economy

U.S. Policy Response

Foreign Policy Response

Political Impact

Israel-China-United States:  Responding to U.S. concern about China’s growing influence over the Israeli economy, Israeli Prime Minister Netanyahu will force additional checks on whether a Hong Kong-based company should be allowed to bid for the construction of a $1.5 billion desalination plant in the country.

China:  Ahead of two major policy meetings in Beijing next week, Communist Party hardliners are reportedly planting criticisms in state media of January’s “Phase I” trade deal between the U.S. and China.  The criticisms likely signal an effort to push back against any further concessions to the U.S. in trade and other bilateral issues.

View the complete PDF

Daily Comment (May 12, 2020)

by Bill O’Grady, Thomas Wash, and Patrick Fearon-Hernandez, CFA

[Posted: 9:30 AM EDT]

Investors today continue to focus on pandemic lockdowns being eased around the world, including the reopening of schools in much of Europe, but a bit of caution is rising as some countries and localities are seeing a rebound in cases.  As always, we review the key pandemic and related news below.

COVID-19:  Official data show confirmed cases have risen to 4,201,921 worldwide with 286,835 deaths and 1,467,412 recoveries.  In the United States, confirmed cases rose to 1,347,936 with 80,634 deaths and 232,733 recoveries.  Here is the interactive chart from the Financial Times that allows you to compare cases and deaths among countries, scaled by population.

Virology

Real Economy

Financial Market Impact

  • Data from the Wilshire Trust Universe Comparison Service shows public pension plans in the U.S. lost a median 13.2% in the three months ended March 31, slightly worse than the previous record decline in the fourth quarter of 2008.  Despite a partial rebound in performance since the beginning of April, the loss will likely make pension costs even more burdensome for states, counties, and cities going forward, which will probably impact their creditworthiness for years.

U.S. Policy Response

Foreign Policy Response

View the complete PDF

Weekly Geopolitical Report – Schumann in Volgograd (May 11, 2020)

by Patrick Fearon-Hernandez, CFA

If you ever find yourself in Volgograd, Russia, you will visit Rodina Mat’ Zovyot.  It’s unavoidable.  The statue, depicting Mother Russia calling her sons to battle against her invaders, is one of the tallest in the world.  Standing almost 280 feet high, she is nearly twice as tall as the Statue of Liberty.  Her colossal height is accentuated by her position at the summit of Mamayev Kurgan, the high ground overlooking Volgograd, whose great, grassy green slopes were fertilized by the blood of a quarter-million Soviet soldiers who died defending it from the invading Nazis during World War II, when the city was still known as Stalingrad.

You never know when you’re about to have an experience that will stay in your memory, and haunt you, for the rest of your life.  Such was the moment when I first entered the glittering round chamber below the statue, where an eternal flame keeps alive the memory of the 20 million or so Russians who died in the war.  I entered just at the beginning of the ceremony marking the changing of the guard.  Young Russian soldiers in ill-fitting uniforms and black jack boots marched in painfully slow goose steps up the ramp around the perimeter of the chamber to relieve the previous sentries of their duty.  It was impressive in the extreme.  But, more than anything, I remember the haunting, plaintive choral music playing in the background (see this video).  It perfectly expressed the quiet calm and peace that all who suffer in war must yearn for, if only in death.  But when I asked my guide what the song was, I was flabbergasted by her reply: “Daydreams, by Schumann.”

What?! A Russian World War II memorial playing the music of a German composer?  How could it be?

View the full report

Daily Comment (May 11, 2020)

by Bill O’Grady, Thomas Wash, and Patrick Fearon-Hernandez, CFA

[Posted: 9:30 AM EDT]

Good morning and happy Monday!  Given the news flow of recent weeks, it was rather quiet overnight.  Risk markets are lower this morning.  We update the COVID-19 news.  Here are the details:

COVID-19:  The number of reported cases is 4,122,173 with 283,001 deaths and 1,418,656 recoveries.  In the U.S., there are 1,329,799 confirmed cases with 79,528 deaths and 216,169 recoveries.

For those who like to keep score at home, the FT has created a nifty interactive chart that allows one to compare cases and fatalities between nations, scaled by population.

The virus news:

  • The good news:
    • One of the early concerns as hospitalizations rose was a shortage of ventilators. There were measures taken to repurpose assembly lines to make the medical device.  As we have noted in earlier reports, there have been cases of silent hypoxia, where patients have blood/oxygen levels that are critically low yet seem to exhibit little distress.  The usual protocol in such cases is to deploy a ventilator.  However, due to the lack of distress, doctors are now using less invasive measures to raise oxygen levels, instead deploying CPAP machines, laying patients in a prone position or giving oxygen.
  • The bad news:

The policy news:

The economic news:

The market news:

The foreign policy news:

  • For years, economists have argued that China’s economy was overly dependent on investment and exports. In fact, China’s policy mix deliberately disadvantaged households, forcing them to oversave.  This saving provided funds for investment but as household saving continued to rise, it swamped the needs of domestic investment, leading to large trade surpluses.  As China prepares its 14th five-year plan, policymakers are anticipating a more hostile foreign environment that will require more domestic-driven demand.  Perhaps deglobalization will finally prompt a policy mix that boosts domestic consumption and reduces the trade surplus.
  • The U.K. has outlined its reopening process. Although most stay-at-home orders remain in place, relaxation starts in earnest on June 1, when primary schools reopen.  Additional openings are expected in early July.  The U.K. will impose a quarantine on air travelers.
  • In response to the drop in oil revenues due to lower oil prices, Saudi Arabia announced a series of measures designed to reduce the impending fiscal deficit. Spending will be cut and its VAT rate will be tripled.  Austerity is rarely popular, so we will be watching the reaction to these measures from Saudi citizens.  We note that the kingdom has announced a unilateral 1.0 mbpd cut in production, likely in a bid to lift prices and oil revenues; oil prices jumped on the news.

Iran:  At least 19 Iranian sailors died in what appears to be a friendly-fire accident during naval exercises.  Although details are sketchy, it looks like a vessel was mistakenly struck by a ship-to-ship missile.  The exercises were being held in the Gulf of Oman; there are no reports that any U.S. ship was in the vicinity.

India/China:  The border between the two nations has been in dispute for some time but, since it sits in the inhospitable Himalayan mountain range, military operations tend to be limited.  It appears that soldiers from both nations exchanged words and non-lethal blows over the weekend before officers on both sides ordered troops to disengage.

View the complete PDF

Asset Allocation Weekly (May 8, 2020)

by Asset Allocation Committee

The U.S. economy has been hit with shelter-in-place orders that have depressed consumption and reduced production.  The economic readings on Q2 will be historically bad, perhaps even worse than the Great Depression.  However, based on the assumptions that (a) aggressive policy support will continue, and (b) the pandemic will wane over time, either due to natural herd immunity or medical intervention, financial markets are assuming the impact of COVID-19 will be severe in impact but short in duration.  Although we mostly agree with that assessment, the rebound has much to do with how GDP is reported.  The common way is to annualize the quarterly change.  Thus, if we get a large decline in Q2, a very modest rise in GDP in Q3 will tend to look quite large.  This is not the only way to measure the change in GDP.  The year-on-year change will look less onerous in Q2 but won’t look as impressive in Q3.

Another way we like to look at the GDP data is against its long-term trend.  To forecast Q2 GDP, we are taking advantage of a new high-frequency index created by the New York FRB.  The index is designed to measure the yearly change in GDP—how much GDP has changed compared to Q2 2019.  It is currently forecasting about a 12% yearly change.[1]  We can then take that number and calculate what the level of GDP looks like compared to its long-term trend.

To generate this chart, we log-transform real annual GDP and regress a time trend through the data.  The important line is the lower deviation line.  There are two periods when GDP was well below trend; the Great Depression and the post-Great Financial Crisis to the present.  The Great Depression showed a massive drop in the level of GDP that took until 1942 to return to trend.  Although fiscal and monetary policy were expanding after 1932, it took war spending to finally bring the economy back to trend.  What has been disconcerting about the past expansion is that it was much slower than the long-term trend.  And so, the level of GDP continued to fall compared to trend; our estimate for GDP in the COVID-19 recession shows a downleg in growth that is rivaling levels seen in 1935.

The point of this analysis is that the trend should represent some degree of capacity.  It is possible the trajectory for GDP that held from 1901 to 2008 is no longer possible.  But, if that trendline does represent a normal level for GDP, it would suggest the economy can absorb aggressive fiscal and monetary policy expansion before inflation becomes a problem.  If inflation starts to rise before the trendline is achieved, it would confirm that the trendline is no longer valid; however, for the political class, it would seem natural to find out if the long-term trend line remains a measure of capacity.  In other words, we would expect even more deficit spending and easy monetary policy until inflation returns.  Given how far GDP remains below trend, the return of inflation may take a rather long time.

View the PDF


[1] Although this is not the focus of this report, the forecast level of decline is consistent with a 35% drop in annualized GDP in Q2.

Daily Comment (May 8, 2020)

by Bill O’Grady, Thomas Wash, and Patrick Fearon-Hernandez, CFA

[Posted: 9:30 AM EDT]

Good morning and happy Friday!  Global risk markets are rising at the same time Treasury yields are falling.  It’s employment Friday; we cover the data below but, suffice it to say, it’s historic and not in a good way.  We update the COVID-19 news.  This week’s Asset Allocation Weekly is published below.  And, podcasts are back!  Despite being unable to utilize our recording studio, our sound engineer, Dane Stole, has figured out how we can record remotely.  Check it out!  Here are the details:

COVID-19:  The number of reported cases is 3,862,174 with 269,881 deaths and 1,291,490 recoveries.  In the U.S., there are 1,256,972 confirmed cases with 75,670 deaths and 195,036 recoveries.

For those who like to keep score at home, the FT has created a nifty interactive chart that allows one to compare cases and fatalities between nations, scaled by population.

The virus news:

The policy news:

  • House Democrats are putting together a fourth coronavirus stimulus package. Early reports suggest a number around $2.0 trillion.  However, we would not be surprised to see this number go higher.  Lobbyists realize this will probably be the last one for a while so they are trying to get the “last shot” at their goals.  We do note negotiations with the GOP, both Senate and White House, have not started.  We expect a rather frosty response from the Senate, but perhaps a more positive one from the executive branch.
  • One of the lingering concerns about the policy response to COVID-19 is that much of the funds come from the states, which mostly lack the ability to deficit spend. In the recovery from the 2007-09 recession, falling state spending mostly offset higher federal spending, blunting the policy response.  The decline in state tax revenues is widespread. A bill has been introduced to shore up state revenue.
(Data: Lucy Dadayan/The Urban Institute. Chart: Andrew Witherspoon/Axios)

(Data: Lucy Dadayan/The Urban Institute. Chart: Andrew Witherspoon/Axios)

The economic news:

The market news:

The foreign policy news:

Argentina:  The country’s biggest bondholders are balking at the restructuring deal being offered by the government.  The Kirchner government wants a 62% reduction in interest payments and a 5.4% write-off.

China:  There are reports that a new computer virus, called Aria-body, was developed by a group with ties to the Chinese military.  The virus can take control of a computer and apparently cover its tracks.  It is passed invisibly through emails.  Its primary purpose appears to be information gathering.

Middle East:  The U.S. is pulling Patriot missile batteries out of Saudi Arabia.  These were initially put in the kingdom in response to the missile attack last year.  The decision to remove the missile defense system could reflect a number of factors.  First, it is possible that the kingdom has improved its own defenses and no longer needs the U.S. support.  Second, backchannel contacts with Iran may have reached some sort of agreement not to repeat the missile attack; as we noted yesterday, Israel noted that Iran appears to be pulling back from Syria.  It may be that Iran simply lacks the resources to threaten Saudi Arabia and the U.S. is reacting to that fact.  Finally, there is a clear move to reduce the American military footprint in the Middle East and this action reflects that.  We do note that Islamic State is stepping up its activities as the U.S. and Europe reduce troop strength in Iraq.

View the complete PDF

Daily Comment (May 7, 2020)

by Bill O’Grady, Thomas Wash, and Patrick Fearon-Hernandez, CFA

[Posted: 9:30 AM EDT] Good morning; it’s the 75th anniversary of Germany’s surrender in WWII.  Despite expectations of dreadful labor market data tomorrow, equity futures continue to move higher.   The BOE maintains current policy.  We update the COVID-19 news.  Our Weekly Energy Update can be found here.  Here are the details:

COVID-19:  The number of reported cases is 3,769,150 with 264,111 deaths and 1,250,579 recoveries.  In the U.S., there are 1,228,609 confirmed cases with 73,431 deaths and 189,910 recoveries.

For those who like to keep score at home, the FT has created a nifty interactive chart that allows one to compare cases and fatalities between nations, scaled by population.

The virus news:

  • The good news:
    • Epidemiologists and health economists are working to discern which social distancing measures are worth the cost. This exercise is an important next step in establishing how society should operate in the absence of established therapies for COVID-19.  In this current stage, epidemiologists dominated the conversation and were focused mostly on reducing infections.  The next phase will be figuring out which mitigation measures save the most lives compared to the costs entailed in implementing them.  This process will be difficult because we know so little about the virus.  And, it may lead to governments permitting activities only to find that this was a bad idea.  Still, this is progress because it is the process of learning to cope with the virus being with us for the foreseeable future.
    • There may be more UV light in our future; UV light disinfects the air and surfaces but tends to burn skin and eyes, reducing its usage as a safety measure. Scientists at Columbia have created a version of UV lighting that doesn’t burn skin or eyes that could be used as a continual disinfectant in public areas.  If this works, it would reduce the odds of transmission in public places and speed the return of opening businesses and restaurants.  We could see businesses, arenas and airports have visitors pass through such light to reduce transmission of viruses.
    • Mass testing has been something of a problem for many countries. Without testing, it is difficult to know the extent of the virus’s spread.  Researchers are investigating if they can trace the degree of infection in a community in sewage.  It is known that the virus does leave the digestive tract.  Measuring the “back end” may tell mayors and governors that a problem is developing before it becomes evident in hospitalizations.
    • Here’s another drug to watch—EIDD-2801, an antiviral that is currently under trial in the U.K. and will begin phase 1 in the U.S. later this month. It is designed to work similarly to remdesivir but can be taken as a pill; remdesivir must be administered intravenously.
    • There is some promising work being done with llamas to create a potential therapy for COVID-19. Their blood can generate unique antibodies to the virus.  The good news is that it would give a person immediate immunity to COVID-19; the bad news is that the immunity wanes rather quickly, in one to two months.  However, it could be used to protect health care workers until a vaccine is developed.
    • Germany, Europe’s largest economy, is beginning to reopen.  Its reported cases are in clear decline. The secret of Germany’s success was widespread testing and general compliance with social distancing.  Germany’s recovery would help the EU economy, which, as we note below, is in very bad shape overall.
(Source: FT)
  • The bad news:
    • Coronaviruses are known to mutate. There are reports that the current virus is a version that began to emerge in mid-March and is different than what originally came from China.  The new version isn’t necessarily more virulent, but it may replicate faster, making those infected sicker than what was seen in the initial version.
    • One debate governments are having is when to reopen schools. There is evidence to suggest that children are less susceptible to the worst of COVID-19 and thus probably face less danger in reducing social distancing (assuming, of course, no preexisting conditions exist).  However, there is a potential problem with reopening schools—children may become vectors for COVID-19 by harboring asymptomatic infections and putting their families at risk.  We should note these studies conflict with others suggesting children are not necessarily a risk.
    • As noted yesterday, nursing homes remain an area of great risk for COVID-19.
    • There are reports that France may have had a fatality from COVID-19 as early as December. If true, it means the virus was circulating around Europe well before February.
    • Over the past few weeks, we have noted the various ways COVID-19 attacks the human body. This report is a recap of what is currently known.
    • There has been a rise in apparent suicides among Russian medical staff. It is believed that stress related to COVID-19 is to blame.

The policy news:

  • One of the issues we have been watching for is a policy mistake. The biggest is when central banks or fiscal authorities inadvertently cause systemic risk because they didn’t backstop a certain area of the financial market.  The ECB may be introducing this risk because it has refused, so far, to offer support to the European high yield market.
  • In the U.S., there were provisions in the stimulus package to aid student loan borrowers. Unfortunately, some borrowers, many of whom took out loans prior to 2010, find that the provisions don’t include their loans.  It doesn’t appear there was a rationale for the exclusion and seems to be a simple oversight.
  • There has been massive fiscal and monetary support to the economy. However, one area that has been repeatedly rebuffed in getting support is private equity.  The lack of support shows how politically toxic this sector has become.
  • There is also a political standoff brewing between the White House, which is pushing for additional stimulus, and the right-wing establishment in Congress, which is becoming uncomfortable with the level of spending. This is more of an intra-party conflict within the GOP.
  • Part of the stimulus package was a boost to unemployment insurance. In addition to the usual state payments, the federal government is kicking in an additional $600 per week.  This measure was pushed by the representatives from large urban areas with high living expenses.  However, outside major cities, unemployment benefits exceed what many workers were making before the shutdown.  Needless to say, there is an incentive to simply exhaust the unemployment insurance before returning to work.  We are seeing reports that some businesses, which have been given permission to reopen after lockdown, are struggling to find workers, in part due to the generous benefits given for not working.

The economic news:

  • Tomorrow, the BLS will release April’s employment report. As yesterday’s ADP report showed, job losses are going to be historic.  The current forecast is for a drop in nonfarm payrolls of 21.0 mm.  The largest previous drop in history, starting in 1939, was 1.959 mm in September 1945, due in part to war demobilization.  The unemployment rate for April is forecast at 16.0%.  Although there are great hopes that the economy will rebound quickly and workers will only face temporary layoffs, some businesses won’t recover from this drop in business, turning temporary layoffs into permanent ones.  At the same time, some real time data does suggest there is an element of stabilization in the economy; it’s not recovering fast but it isn’t getting worse.
  • The economic situation in Europe is terrible. The EU warns that the virus has affected nations differently and the uneven nature of the shock requires a unified response.  The BOE warned that the K. economy could contract by 25% in Q2.
  • An idea that is emerging is the concept of the flexible lease. Currently, lease payments are fixed; under normal circumstances, that makes sense.  The building owner doesn’t see his sunk capital costs drop in a recession.  But, in the wake of the current downturn, some landlords are showing openness to the idea of setting rent based on business revenue.  This could create some rather interesting situations; for example, a REIT may be valued based on the business growth of tenants, not how well leased a building is.  If this practice were to become widespread, it would tend to turn real estate investments into more of an equity product and less of a fixed income product.
  • We have been documenting the growing problems in the protein supply chain. Stores are beginning to put limits on meat purchases and prices are rising.  Until we see processors reopen, supplies will likely remain constrained.

 

  • One of the arguments used to end restrictions on interstate banking was that larger banks would have economies of scale that would improve their efficiency and reduce costs. This was more of a faith-based idea; there wasn’t much evidence at the onset that it was true.  In some aspects of banking, scale turned out to be important.  The handling of transactions has improved with concentration, for example.  And, there is no doubt that scale helps with creating and building technology.  However, for relationship banking, there is scant evidence that scale improves service, especially for smaller firms.  Community banks have proven this in the COVID-19 situation, being much more effective in tapping the government programs to provide loans to small businesses.
  • As we detail in the data table below, China’s April exports bounced unexpectedly, although much of this may be clearing up the backlog from Q1. We also note that Chinese car sales are starting to recover.

The market news:

  • The battle for the USPS is underway. The postal service has been losing money most years, in part due to its mandate to deliver letters.  In general, delivery services make their money on parcels, while regular mail is a loss leader.  Delivery companies have reduced the USPS hold on parcels and electronic mail has made letter carrying even less attractive.  In addition, the unionized workforce of the USPS makes it difficult for the service to adapt to changes in the marketplace.  The White House has appointed a new postmaster and is pressing to renegotiate labor contracts and delivery arrangements that are unfavorable to the USPS.  We note that online retailers who tend to benefit from these delivery arrangements are lobbying hard to maintain the current status and are asking Congress for a bailout of the postal system.
  • Years ago, we participated in a conference call with a client and her advisor. The client wondered if she should buy one-ounce gold coins or quarter-ounce coins.  We responded by noting that four of the latter equal the former, to which the client said, “If I need to bribe the border guards, am I better off with smaller coins?”  We responded, “If we get to that degree of societal breakdown, you will be better off with booze, bullets and tobacco.”  Much to the chagrin of the advisor, the client agreed with us.[1]  Recent market performance appears, at least to some extent, to support this notion.

The foreign policy news:

  • Tensions with China continue to escalate:
  • A surprising fight has emerged between China’s Finance Ministry and the PBOC. The Finance Ministry wants the Chinese central bank to monetize its spending.  In other words, the ministry wants the PBOC to directly purchase its debt.  It is unusual for such fights to occur in the open; we suspect the battle is underway because the government’s leadership doesn’t know how it wants to handle increased fiscal spending.  We have been noting evidence that China is reverting to its “tried and true” methods of boosting the economy via infrastructure spending.  Apparently, Chairman Xi hasn’t decided how he wants to fund that spending quite yet.  And so, the PBOC is pressing to maintain some semblance of independence.  There may be an element of entertaining a foreign audience as well.  It is becoming clear that the Fed is steadily seeing its independence erode.  If the PBOC appears to “win” this one, it might boost the status of the CNY relative to the USD.
  • Recent oil losses have not just affected oil producers. Retail clients in China purchased products designed to follow the price of oil.  Apparently, they were structured a bit like futures contracts; you can lose more than your initial investment.  When oil prices fell into negative territory last month, these speculators took losses they didn’t expect.  Apparently, regulators are pressuring Chinese banks to absorb some of these losses to quell investor unrest.
  • The impact of COVID-19 on Russia has been escalating recently. President Putin was planning on a referendum of sorts and expanding infrastructure spending this year; both have been disrupted by the virus.  Putin has tended to foster close relations with the Russian Orthodox Church, something a bit unusual for a former KGB agent.  However, social distancing rules have created divisions between the church and the government.  Although we don’t expect Putin to face any real threats to his position, he is clearly having a rough time.
  • An issue we are watching with increasing interest is Germany’s Constitutional Court, which ruled that the ECB engaged in monetary practices outside of mandate and the approval of these measures by the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) were in error. Germany’s court ruled that the ECB must give it adequate justification for its bond-buying or the Bundesbank will no longer be permitted to participate in the program.  This situation is a problem on various levels.  First, it violated the ECB’s independence for a German court to dictate policy.  Second, it clearly undermines the authority of the CJEU.  If Chancellor Merkel doesn’t thwart the German court, then she will be creating a situation where the ECB may not be able to continue to act in any way that defies Germany, and it will seriously weaken EU governing bodies.  In some respects, we have been expecting the EU and the Eurozone to eventually fall apart; without the Soviet Union to act as a threat to work in concert, and without the U.S. providing costless security, the EU and the Eurozone were in grave danger.  However, we didn’t expect a court ruling to be the event that triggers the potential breakup.  We would not be surprised to see Merkel try to resolve this problem; at the same time, it is hard to see any other German leader with the power and authority to buck the court’s ruling.  When she is gone, the chances that Germany goes its own way increase.  We are starting to see other European leaders criticize the German court, seeing it as a threat to stability.
  • On the topic of the ECB, the European central bank has been offering loans to European commercial banks to maintain credit lines. However, the banks have been turning down the programs because they are already burdened with bad loans from the last downturn.  In addition, the recovery in the EU has been rather sluggish anyway, meaning that many companies were unable to grow out of their bad debt.  EU policymakers have limited capacity for fiscal spending and rely on banks for stimulus.  However, if the banks can’t be forced to lend, the support will fail to work.
  • We have been keeping close watch on a number of GOP senators who have been crafting a right-wing populist agenda. Their policy mix is based on deglobalization and anti-trust.  Who is involved?  Hawley (R-MO), Sen. Cotton (R-AK), Sen. Rubio (R-FL) and Sen. Cruz (R-TX).  Hawley recently published an op-ed calling for the end of the WTO.  Three of the four sent letters to the White House calling for a suspension of temporary work permits granted to foreign workers due to the virus-driven job losses.  Anti-immigration is part of this policy mix.  Our position is that populism in the U.S. is on the ascendency; the only question is the variant, i.e., right- or left-wing.  So far, it appears the right wing is winning the most influence.

View the complete PDF


[1] Again, this is Bill’s story and he is using the imperial “we.”