Daily Comment (July 28, 2020)

by Bill O’Grady, Thomas Wash, and Patrick Fearon-Hernandez, CFA

[Posted: 9:30 AM EDT] | PDF

Even if the U.S. opening is looking a bit soft today, investors should be encouraged by an apparent stabilization in new U.S. coronavirus cases and the release (after considerable delay) of Senate Republicans’ proposal for a new coronavirus relief bill.  We outline both news items and all the other key developments below.

COVID-19:  Official data show confirmed cases have risen to 16,495,309 worldwide, with 654,327 deaths and 9,590,929 recoveries.  In the United States, confirmed cases rose to 4,294,270, with 148,056 deaths and 1,325,804 recoveries.  Here is the interactive chart from the Financial Times that allows you to compare cases and deaths among countries, scaled by population.

Virology:

Economic Impact:

  • Consultants at Accenture (ACN, 223.32) estimate that U.S. bank profits will be hit twice as hard by coronavirus loan loss provisions than their European peers, in a study that upends the traditional wisdom of European banks’ relative weakness.  The consultants foresee $427 billion in loan loss charges for 58 top U.S. banks over the next three years, equal to about 10.2% of their average 2020 loan books.  The 50 top European banks in the study are expected to take loan loss charges of $455 billion over the same period, equal to just 4.6% of their 2020 loan balances.
  • Adding to the various letter-designated scenarios for the post-crisis economic recovery, some people are now talking about a “K-shaped” rebound.  The idea is to capture the way that many people with white-collar jobs and financial investments are actually doing all right, while the many who work in low-paying service jobs and don’t have stocks or bonds are struggling to survive.

U.S. Policy Response:

  • Late yesterday, Senate Republicans finally released their proposal for the next coronavirus relief bill.  In comparison with the $3.5 trillion proposal passed weeks ago by Democrats in the House, the Republican proposal would cost about $1.0 trillion, setting up what is likely to be weeks of negotiations with the House and raising the risk of a deadlock or severely watered down bill that would likely drive down equity markets.  Key elements of the Republican proposal would:
    • Send another $1,200 check to the same group that received cash this spring (with payments phasing out for individuals with income above $75,000 and married couples with income above $150,000);
    • Provide an additional payment of $500 for each child, defined more broadly than last spring to include dependents over the age of 16 (meaning a bigger payment for parents of college students and people who take care of their elderly parents);
    • Extend the supplemental federal unemployment benefit, but cut it from the current $600 per week as follows:
      • Through September, the benefit would be cut to $200 per week for each recipient;
      • From October to XXX, the benefit would be set so that the sum of federal and state benefits would replace 70% of the recipient’s previous wage;
    • Provide $105 billion to schools and universities to cover the costs of operating during the pandemic, with some of the aid only available to schools that plan to physically reopen;
    • Provide no additional aid to state and local governments, but provide more flexibility in using existing federal assistance;
    • Provide $16 billion for expanded coronavirus testing;
    • Expand a worker-retention tax credit created in March, allowing larger credits per worker and letting up to $30,000 of wages and benefits qualify instead of just $10,000;
    • Temporarily give businesses a 100% tax deduction for restaurant meals, up from the current 50% deduction;
    • Adjust liability rules to make it harder to successfully sue schools, businesses and healthcare providers in coronavirus-related cases;
    • Provide for a number of other initiatives, some of which cynics might call “porkbarrel” (no surprise there!).

Foreign Policy Response:

  • To help ensure Eurozone banks can absorb losses and keep lending through the crisis, the ECB has called on lenders to keep foregoing dividend payments until at least January and be “extremely moderate” when setting staff bonuses.  The Bank of England said it would carry out a review in the fourth quarter over whether British lenders could resume paying dividends in 2021.

Financial Market Action:

United States:  Citing concern that economist Judy Shelton isn’t committed to the Federal Reserve’s independence, Senator Susan Collins (R., Maine) said she would join with Senator Mitt Romney (R., Utah) in opposing Shelton’s nomination to the Fed board of governors.  Since the Republicans only have a 53-47 vote advantage in the Senate, Shelton can’t afford to lose more than three Republicans if all Democrats oppose her candidacy.  Separately, the Fed will begin its latest policy-setting meeting today.  The policymakers are widely expected to hold current policy steady, but their post-meeting statement tomorrow could hold some clues on how they expect policy to evolve in the future.

United States-China:  State governments and the Department of Agriculture are investigating reports that hundreds of U.S. residents have been mailed unsolicited seeds from China.  The seeds raise the specter of a deliberate effort to spread toxic, noxious or invasive plants or weeds in the U.S. (a mild form of biological warfare?), so officials have warned people not to plant them.

New Zealand-Hong Kong-China:  The New Zealand government announced that it would suspend its extradition treaty with Hong Kong, joining the U.S., the U.K., Canada and Australia in protesting Beijing’s draconian new security law for the city.  The move is more evidence that the “Five Eyes” intelligence-sharing alliance could be evolving into the leading coalition against Chinese expansionism.

Russia:  Thousands of demonstrators in the far eastern city of Khabarovsk yesterday continued to demand the release of their jailed governor, Sergei Furgal.  The protests suggest the city’s protestors haven’t been mollified by President Putin’s naming of a replacement governor from Furgal’s opposition party.

Russia-Ukraine:  Beginning yesterday, Ukrainian troops and Russian-backed rebels in eastern Ukraine implemented a new ceasefire.  However, frictions remain because of issues such as Russia’s annexation of the Crimean peninsula and Kiev’s plan to exclude rebel territory from an upcoming election.

Japan-South Korea:  The Japanese government has warned of another sharp deterioration in Japanese-South Korean relations because of recently erected statues in a South Korean park that depict a man resembling Prime Minister Shinzo Abe kneeling and bowing to a girl symbolizing South Korean “comfort women” in World War II.

View PDF

Weekly Geopolitical Report – Rethinking China: Part I (July 27, 2020)

by Bill O’Grady | PDF

President and General Secretary Xi Jingping has changed the course of Chinese governance.  Deng Xiaoping Peng created a collective leadership model to prevent the rise of another Mao.  Leaders were carefully selected and surrounded by leading figures of the various factions of the Communist Party of China (CPC).  Term limits were put in place to restrict a President/General Secretary to two five-year terms. Deng established a structure of government which was somewhat decentralized.  Cults of personality were discouraged.

Xi Jinping has reversed these measures.  He has ended the restrictions on term limits.  The Standing Committee of the Politburo is mostly composed of allies.  Instead of using the structure of government that diffused power, Xi has created a series of informal committees that actually execute policy; this gives him nearly complete control of the government.  “Xi Jinping thought” is now discussed in party and academic circles; although no one has bound them into a little red book, it would not be a surprise if that were to occur.

Xi is also changing China’s foreign policy.  Under Deng, foreign policy was all about “hide your ambitions and disguise your claws.”  Under Xi, foreign policy has been more assertive.  However, over the past 18 months, we have seen aggressive and, perhaps more importantly, widespread actions.  China seems to be willing to create tensions across a broad spectrum, which does appear to be a new development.

There are two broad themes to this report.  In Part I, we will frame China’s situation using Japan as an analog.  In Part II, we will continue the analog, discuss recent Chinese aggression and offer a detailed analysis of the potential motivations of Chinese and U.S. policymakers.  As always, we will conclude the discussion with potential market ramifications.

Read the full report

Daily Comment (July 27, 2020)

by Bill O’Grady, Thomas Wash, and Patrick Fearon-Hernandez, CFA

[Posted: 9:30 AM EDT] | PDF

Happy Monday!  Baseball is back, and the NHL and NBA are close as well.  Our friends on the Texas coast had to cope with Hurricane Hanna over the weekend.  Equity markets are moving higher, the dollar is softening and the bull trend in gold is starting to accelerate.  This is one of the busiest weeks for Q2 earnings.  We lead with policy news, followed by the pandemic update.  Let’s get to it:

Policy news: 

  • The GOP will unveil its stimulus plan today, but internal dissention is running high. It isn’t clear the Senate could pass this bill with GOP votes alone, even though the party is in the majority.  The White House wanted a payroll tax cut, but it doesn’t look like that provision made it.  There is a debate over the $600 per week extra unemployment benefit.  There is no doubt that some workers are staying home because unemployment insurance pays about the same or better than any job available.  However, the problem with drastically reducing this benefit is that for those workers without any job available, the proposed reduction to 75% of their previous wage will lead to a drop in spending.
    • The last JOLTS report suggests that the inability to attract workers may not be as big of an impediment as the anecdotal evidence would suggest. In May, hires outpaced openings, 6.487 million to 5.397 million.  What is probably happening is that lower paid jobs in the service industries are struggling to get their workers back under current unemployment insurance provisions.  But, if you cut the insurance payments, not every laid-off worker may be able to find a job (openings were running 7.0 million prior to the pandemic).
    • The mere threat to reduce the $600 per week supplement could lead lower paid households to try to save as much as possible before the aid is restricted. If the goal of the extra cash is to support spending, this precautionary saving works against that aim.
  • We suspect the financial markets are looking through the current political morass and expecting the Democrats to dictate terms, meaning we will likely see a total package of $1.5 trillion to $2.0 trillion.
  • Congress isn’t the only body dealing with stimulus policy. The Fed meets this week and is trying to chart a path forward.  We don’t expect any new measures to be announced but the internal debate will be important.  Namely, the Fed will try to figure out how to explain any changes to its reaction function; in English, that’s how long will the Fed wait to react to higher price levels.  Since Volcker, the policy has been to react pre-emptively to potential inflation.  That policy was designed for a period of elevated inflation expectations.  That period is probably behind us, so allowing inflation to overshoot becomes stimulative.  Exactly how to do that remains uncertain.
  • But wait…there’s more. Tech leaders are visiting Capitol Hill on Wednesday to testify before the House Antitrust Committee.  We don’t expect much more than posturing at this meeting, but if there is a threat to big tech, antitrust is perhaps the most potent.  Since the mid-1980s, the operating theory of antitrust has been that if consumers are not harmed, size or market control alone should not trigger regulatory action.  The tech firms have taken this legal theory to heart and have become behemoths, sometimes through mergers, other times through predatory behavior.  Nevertheless, it is clear that consumers have faced little harm.  So, who has paid the cost of their behavior?  Labor, from Steve Jobs’s plan to avoid “poaching” other tech workers (a clear plan to suppress wages) to tales of harsh working conditions at some tech companies.  A new antitrust era is likely coming, but it won’t necessarily be bad for shareholders (although such reports will become more common as the situation evolves).  The breakup of Standard Oil proved to be a huge benefit for shareholders as the value of the company in parts was greater than as a whole.  However, it is possible that the fear of regulation could adversely affect the tech giants and, given their dominance in the indexes, a negative impact is possible.
  • Finally, although it isn’t happening here yet, the U.K. is already starting to discuss what to do with the bad debt that will come from loan programs to support companies in the pandemic. Some of the companies that have been supported will fail; how the bad debt is handled will be interesting to watch.  Will the bad debt remain on bank balance sheets?  Will a “bad bank,” such as the Resolution Trust Corporation, be created?  Will the government simply socialize the debt?  Stay tuned.

COVID-19:  The number of reported cases is 16,264,048 with 648,966 deaths and 9,407,977 recoveries.   In the U.S., there are 4,234,140 confirmed cases with 146,935 deaths and 1,297,863 recoveries.  For those who like to keep score at home, the FT has created an interactive chart that allows one to compare cases across nations using similar scaling metrics.

Virology: 

  • North Korea has instituted an aggressive lockdown at the border city of Kaesong after a COVID-19 infection was reported. This would be the country’s first confirmed case.  A former defector apparently decided to return to North Korea; Pyongyang has indicated that the person was infected, but South Korean officials, who have a strong contact tracing regime in place, indicate that he was not carrying the virus.  It isn’t clear if South Korea is wrong on the infection status, or whether North Korea, which probably does have cases, is using this as a way to reveal it has infections and thus blame Seoul for the outbreak.
  • New cases are springing up in areas that had previously brought the virus under control. The rise in new cases is disappointing, suggesting that it was lockdowns, and not herd immunity, that was keeping caseloads low.
  • The vaccine news is a mixed bag:
    • There are numerous areas in the U.S. where the virus is spreading rapidly. Paradoxically, that could accelerate vaccine trials, which need a large population to test and to be surrounded with infections to determine potency.  If a vaccine is tested in an area with few infections, it is more difficult to know if the vaccine is effective.
    • Given the huge number of vaccines being tested, it seems likely that one of them will prove to work. However, as we have noted earlier, one of the great unknowns is how long the immunity will last.  Sadly, that may simply be an “empirical question,” where we will need to see if those who have been vaccinated become ill six months to a year later.  The key to longer-term immunity will be the T and B cells.
    • History tells us that getting a vaccine is an important step but doesn’t fully end the crisis. Until it is widely distributed and time passes, we won’t know for sure how long the immunity lasts.  Anti-vaccine resistance is strong and will slow the development of herd immunity.  The government will need to determine the order of distribution; if they get it wrong, it could reduce the effectiveness of the campaign.  However, it is worth noting that markets tend to discount the future and will likely look past these problems, which could lead to a further disconnect between the economy and financial markets.

Foreign news:

Market and Economy news:

China news:

View PDF

Daily Comment (July 24, 2020)

by Bill O’Grady, Thomas Wash, and Patrick Fearon-Hernandez, CFA

[Posted: 9:30 AM EDT] | PDF

Happy Friday!  This Friday is starting with a risk-off tone.  Worries about the economy after the rise in claims yesterday and rising tensions with China are affecting sentiment.  But the overarching worry is that Congress will fail to deliver another stimulus package.  We cover China and policy below, along with the pandemic news.  The new Asset Allocation Weekly is available in its usual place along with the companion podcast and chart book.  Let’s get to it:

Policy news: 

  • Yesterday, we reported the GOP was preparing to release its new stimulus package. They failed to do soDisagreements within the congressional GOP caucus and the White House suggest a party in disarray.  What are the sticking points?
    • The White House wants a payroll tax cut or holiday. This isn’t necessarily a bad idea because the tax tends to fall most heavily on lower income workers.  However, in this crisis it may not be all that effective because it doesn’t help people who are not working.  Since layoffs have most adversely affected lower paid workers, the holiday would give money to those less affected by the pandemic.
    • There is disagreement over unemployment insurance. The $600 per week boost is having a distortive effect on the labor markets.  It overpays laid off workers outside major urban areas.  In these regions, the $31K per year that the payment represents, over and above what normal state insurance pays, is likely more than they would get by working.  Thus, it becomes a disincentive to return to work.  However, in higher paid urban areas, the additional benefit probably has less of this effect.  At the same time, it is hard to determine if reducing the benefit makes sense if there is no job to be had.  What remains a mystery is that these issues are nothing new.  Lawmakers have had about three months to think about the second round.  Over that time frame, it seems there would have been an effort to craft a policy that avoids the disincentive to return to work but supports those who can’t find a job.  The reaction yesterday suggests that if work was done, it didn’t get finished.
    • Here is the problem—financial markets have been assuming there would be an agreement. It would include some degree of additional unemployment insurance supplement and another stimulus check.  Aid to state and local governments should be part of the agreement as well.  Once there is evidence that another round of stimulus will be delayed or less than expected, financial markets will discount that outcome.  Even delays pose a problem because the reaction of households to uncertainty will be to save resources and reduce spending.
  • One silver lining, though, is that once a deal is struck (and the odds that nothing happens in an election year are near zero), the government should be able to move stimulus checks faster this time around.

China news:

  • In retaliation for closing the Houston consulate, China is forcing the U.S. to close a similar facility in Chengdu. Tensions between the U.S. and China continue to escalate; we will offer some insights on this issue in an upcoming WGR.
  • The U.S. has arrested three Chinese nationals on accusations of visa fraud. They apparently failed to declare their affiliation with the People’s Liberation Army.
  • The U.S. has sanctioned additional Chinese companies for alleged human rights violations in Xinjiang.
  • As we expected, China is taking steps to bolster Hong Kong’s status as a financial center. China needs the financial expertise contained in the city; other Chinese financial markets, such as Shanghai and Dalian, are simply not sophisticated enough to provide the services available already in Hong Kong (an aside: it seems that Xi may have been hasty in moving on the national security law—it would have made more sense to do so if other financial centers in China could replace Hong Kong).  This decision by China means that financial institutions and their workers will likely get a “light touch” from authorities, at least for a while.  It also opens a point of vulnerability for the West.  The U.S. could force international financial institutions to either quit Hong Kong or lose access to U.S. dollar markets.  Whether this step is taken remains to be seen.
  • Historic flooding continues to pressure the Three Gorges Dam. Officials have admitted parts of the dam have buckled under the pressure building behind the dam.  If the dam were to fail, the impact would be catastrophic to downstream cities, most notably Wuhan.

COVID-19:  The number of reported cases is 15,526,057 with 633,656 deaths and 8,873,385 recoveries.  In the U.S., there are 4,038,864 confirmed cases with 144,305 deaths and 1,233,269 recoveries.  For those who like to keep score at home, the FT has created an interactive chart that allows one to compare cases across nations using similar scaling metrics.  There are 12 states, including Texas, with R0 numbers below 1, meaning the spread of the virus is weakening.

Virology: 

Foreign news:

Market and Economy news:

  • One of the most difficult factors to analyze in markets is their anticipatory nature. When economics is taught, it is one of the areas that isn’t given as much emphasis as it should be.  Here is a case in point: Hershey (HSY, 146.33) is expecting a quiet Halloween and is planning to produce less themed product this year.  Since Halloween is a mask-wearing holiday, it would seem that trick-or-treating might not be affected.  And so, it might make sense to purchase Halloween goods early, just in case…besides, it’s good to have around.
  • The senior loan officer survey has suggested concerns about loan loss problems. New surveys suggest banks are closing credit cards and reducing credit lines on fears that households may not be able to service additional debt.  Bank lending tends to be pro-cyclical; it rises and falls with the business cycle, exacerbating the amplitude of the cycle.  These actions by banks will tend to reduce consumer demand.

View PDF

Asset Allocation Weekly (July 24, 2020)

by Asset Allocation Committee | PDF

In the Federal Reserve’s 107-year history, it has used a number of different methods to manage monetary policy.  In its early years, it relied on the discount rate and reserve requirement adjustments as policy tools.  During WWII, it managed the yield curve to a specific interest rate to support Treasury borrowing to fund the war effort.  In the early 1950s, monetary policy became independent of government borrowing.  From this period into the late 1970s, the Fed managed monetary policy by setting a target rate for fed funds.  Chair Volcker moved to target the money supply in a bid to bring down inflation; monetary targeting ended by 1987.  From 1987 until 2008, the primary tool of monetary policy was the fed funds policy rate.  If the banking system was oversupplied with reserves, the fed funds rate would decline below target.  The Fed would engage in open market operations to reduce the level of reserves to lift the effective fed funds rate.  Under conditions of an undersupplied market, banks would be bidding up rates to acquire reserves; the Fed would inject money into the banking system to prevent the effective fed funds rate from overshooting the target rate.  During the Great Financial Crisis, the U.S. central bank flooded the banking system with reserves to ensure ample liquidity; this action led to a massive level of bank reserves rendering the traditional fed funds rate management impossible.   The level of reserves would have anchored the fed funds rate at zero.  To allow for rate flexibility, the Fed began paying interest on reserves.

In March, when the pandemic triggered financial stress, the FOMC responded quickly.  Not only were rates cut but the Fed announced a series of actions designed to provide liquidity to various parts of the financial system.  In an unprecedented step, the central bank bought corporate bonds, including some that were below investment grade.  It purchased municipal bonds.  It also offered broad support for money markets and commercial paper.  And, it increased and broadened swap lines with foreign central banks to provide global dollar liquidity.  All these actions led to a massive rise in the Fed’s balance sheet.

This chart shows the Federal Reserve’s balance sheet relative to nominal GDP.  Note that the current level of the balance sheet is at all-time highs.

Recently, the Fed’s balance sheet has contracted; this change has raised concerns that the central bank may be withdrawing stimulus which would be bearish for the economy and financial markets.

This fear is misplaced, but understandable.  This chart shows the balance sheet along with the Chicago FRB’s National Financial Conditions Index.  A rising index number indicates increasing financial system stress.  We have shaded three periods of quantitative easing.  It is notable that the first two cycles had specific levels of asset purchases.  In other words, a given level of buying and a definitive end date was established.  The third cycle was more open ended in time but initially fixed in terms of purchases.

The recent rise in the balance sheet is less about supporting the economy and more about suppressing financial stress.  And so, as the level of stress has declined, the demand for Fed support has as well, leading to a decline in the balance sheet.  This isn’t due to the Fed withdrawing support; it is, in fact, evidence of the Fed’s success.  It should be noted, however, that the facilities remain in place.  If stress rises, the Fed has policies in place to suppress it.

The central bank’s next step will likely be to add accommodation.  In other words, additional actions will likely be necessary to encourage economic recovery.  Potential policies might entail yield curve control, “QE for people,” or direct payment from the Fed to households.  The important point is that one should not mistake the recent decline in the balance sheet as a sign of tightening.

View PDF

Business Cycle Report (July 23, 2020)

by Thomas Wash | PDF

The business cycle has a major impact on financial markets; recessions usually accompany bear markets in equities.  The intention of this report is to keep our readers apprised of the potential for recession, updated on a monthly basis.  Although it isn’t the final word on our views about recession, it is part of our process in signaling the potential for a downturn.

In June, the diffusion index stayed in recession territory as improvements in several indicators could not outweigh the negative impact of the previous three months. That being said, it does appear that the worst is now behind us. Financial markets continued to show signs of improvement as Fed Chair Jerome Powell testified before Congress that the Fed will not remove stimulus prematurely. Additionally, fiscal stimulus and monetary easing led to a sharp rise in equities. Meanwhile, the labor market showed signs of improvement as an increase in consumption, following the reduction in lockdown restrictions, allowed firms to hire workers in record numbers. However, economic uncertainty has weighed on consumer and investor confidence as a rise in virus cases toward the end of the month has hindered efforts to further ease restrictions. As a result, six out of the 11 indicators are in contraction territory. The reading for June remains unchanged from the previous month, at -0.1515, well below the recession signal of +0.250.

The chart above shows the Confluence Diffusion Index. It uses a three-month moving average of 11 leading indicators to track the state of the business cycle. The red line signals when the business cycle is headed toward a contraction, while the blue line signals when the business cycle is headed toward a recovery. On average, the diffusion index is currently providing about six months of lead time for a contraction and five months of lead time for a recovery. Continue reading for a more in-depth understanding of how the indicators are performing and refer to our Glossary of Charts at the back of this report for a description of each chart and what it measures. A chart title listed in red indicates that indicator is signaling recession.

Read the full report

Keller Quarterly (July 2020)

Letter to Investors | PDF

Thus far, the year 2020 has not been one most of us would like to repeat.  A pandemic, a sharp and deep recession, social distancing, civil unrest, and political uncertainty have left most people, much less investors, with severe anxieties.  I’ve mentioned before that a professional investor is, or should be, a professional worrier.  In that regard, this year has filled the plate of most investors.  On the other hand, we have long subscribed to Mr. Buffett’s maxim that, in order to successfully invest, “one must be cautious when the majority are bold and bold when the majority are cautious.”  This year, likewise, has supplied large portions of caution and, recently, even a little boldness.

So, where are we now?  We believe it is obvious that the economy hit bottom in April and has begun to recover.  It was a quick, but devastating, two-month recession that saw the economy come to a virtual standstill, the result of governmental and social efforts to mitigate the impact of COVID-19.  Since May, the economy has been battling to reopen, although a resurgence of infections in many regions and lasting damage done to many service industries is producing a slower-moving recovery than anyone would like.  Our economists have been telling us, however, that virtually all recoveries from recessions disappoint as to speed, and the peculiarities of the current situation will not change that.

We are indeed in recovery, but all recoveries are also uneven.  In other words, we shouldn’t be surprised if “a few steps forward” are followed by “one step back” every now and then.  This rhythm disappoints many who want a quick, straight-line recovery, but that’s even contrary to human nature.  I’m reminded of one of C.S. Lewis’ most memorable characters, the old demon, Screwtape, who wrote to his young apprentice, Wormwood, “Has no one ever told you about the law of Undulation? … [Humans’] nearest approach to constancy … is undulation – the repeated return to a level from which they repeatedly fall back, a series of troughs and peaks.  If you had watched your patient carefully, you would have seen this undulation in every department of his life – his interest in his work, his affection for his friends, his physical appetites, all go up and down.”  And, we might add, his mood about the economic and investment future.

It’s the stock market that has surprised most occasional observers.  “How can the market be going up when there is so much trouble around?”  I refer to the above-noted Law of Undulation.  Did the value of American businesses really drop by 35% during four weeks in February-March?  No, in my estimation, but market prices did so drop, affected as they are by undulating emotions.  Market prices have risen sharply since then.  A little good news triggers that classically American emotion: optimism.  Will pessimism return, at least for a little while?  Of course, this is how economies and stock markets always work: they undulate as they make forward progress.  A pandemic merely adds a new factor to the undulation.

Last night I had the pleasure of watching my oldest grandchild graduate from high school, employing virus-safe practices, on a video broadcast via the internet.  As I saw my grandson and his friends, one after the other, take off their masks momentarily to pick up their diplomas off the table and smile for the camera, I was thrilled.  These hard-working young people are sustaining extraordinary difficulties and yet are enduring them with aplomb, full of the optimism of youth.  We need that.  It’s what keeps us, and the nation, going.

Our country has been through many troubles in the past, and we are going through more now.  But through all these undulations we’ve managed to make quite a bit of forward progress along the way.  I fully expect more of the same.  We are investing that way.

We appreciate your confidence in us.

 

Gratefully,

Mark A. Keller, CFA
CEO and Chief Investment Officer

View PDF

Daily Comment (July 23, 2020)

by Bill O’Grady, Thomas Wash, and Patrick Fearon-Hernandez, CFA

[Posted: 9:30 AM EDT] | PDF

U.S. equity markets continue to tick higher, buoyed by expectations of continued stimulus.  The stronger EUR is lifting European stocks, while Chinese equities fell on U.S./China tensions.  Relations with China continue to deteriorate; that’s our lead-off story this morning.  We update the latest policy news as a plethora of programs are due to end by July 31.  We update the pandemic news, recap other foreign developments and wrap up with economic and market news.  The new Weekly Energy Update is available.  Off to the details:

China news:

Policy news: 

  • The GOP Senate leadership says it has an agreement with the White House and will announce the details later today. We will be watching to see the size of the next direct payment to households.  We do note there is growing opposition to additional spending among GOP budget hawks; although we doubt their opposition will be enough to derail the bill, it could mean the GOP leadership will more closely track Democratic proposals to ensure passage.
  • The Fed is deliberating additional stimulus before its July 28-29 meeting. In the background, the Fed continues to debate structural policy changes that would adjust how the central bank reacts to inflation.  In the aftermath of Paul Volcker, the Fed has tended to try to preempt inflation.  The trauma of the high interest rate years led a generation of officials to try at all costs to prevent rising inflation expectations.  The policy worked so well that they now find themselves in the position of feeling the need to signal that they will not act preemptively to prevent a rise in price levels.  To some extent, future policy decisions will depend on this structural policy change.
    • In related news, it does appear that Chris Waller and Judy Shelton will be confirmed by the Senate for the last two open positions on the FOMC. Waller will be a traditional dove, but Shelton appears to be more sensitive to politics.  It may turn out that she doesn’t act as she has been portrayed, but, for now, we are assuming she will be dovish with a GOP president and hawkish with a Democratic president.  However, if we are correct in our assessment, the impact of her dissents will likely be small.

COVID-19:  The number of reported cases is 15,255,093 with 606,206 deaths and 8,670,684 recoveries.  In the U.S., there are 3,971,343 confirmed cases with 143,193 deaths and 1,210,849 recoveries.  For those who like to keep score at home, the FT has created a an interactive chart that allows one to compare cases across nations using similar scaling metrics.  Axios has updated its state infection map; the pace of infections appears to have leveled off.

Virology: 

Foreign news:

Market and Economy news:

View PDF