Daily Comment (July 31, 2020)

by Bill O’Grady, Thomas Wash, and Patrick Fearon-Hernandez, CFA

[Posted: 9:30 AM EDT] | PDF

Happy St. Ignatius[1] Day!  It’s Friday and the “dog days” of August await.  Equity markets are mostly higher this morning after the major tech firms revealed impressive earnings.  This may be one of the rare times where such earnings are a problem given the firms’ recent testimony to Congress.  Policy news, or the lack thereof, leads today’s coverage.  China and COVID-19 are next.  The new Asset Allocation Weekly is posted below (and published as a separate report on our website) and the related podcast and chart book are also available.  Here are the details:

Policy news: 

  • As a number of recovery measures are set to expire, congressional leaders remain far apart on a deal for another stimulus package. The GOP has offered a series of individual bills that would address unemployment insurance and evictions.  Democrats were not impressed, fearing that once these measures pass, other goals would languish.  We do expect a bill to be passed, because the lack of additional support would be a serious problem.  As yesterday’s GDP data revealed, the economy is in a difficult spot.
  • On the topic of yesterday’s GDP data, the headline numbers were so historically bad that much of the detail was lost in the coverage. This is the fourth recession since 1982, meaning that the U.S. economy has suffered a recession roughly every 9.5 years since then.  From 1946 through the 1982 recession, the economy had a recession, on average, every four years.  One reason that recessions became less frequent was due to a structural change in the economy.  As services became more important, downturns were less frequent.  This is because services are less prone to inventory cycles.  Goods production is hard to get exactly right; if overproduction occurs, and stockpiles rise, activity declines and recessions occur.  But, in services, the “inventory” is actually made up of workers.  Firms will adjust tasks when business slows and only reluctantly reduce headcount.[2]  In general, there is less volatility in services relative to goods.  From 1947 until Q1 2020, the average contribution to GDP from services consumption was 1.1% per quarter with a standard deviation of 0.6%.  For goods over the same time frame, the average was +0.9% with a standard deviation of 1.7%.  However, last quarter, goods consumption subtracted 2.2% from GDP, while services consumption pulled a whopping -22.9%.

This chart highlights the problem of boosting growth.  Consumption dominates GDP and services dominate consumption.  Goods represent 33% of consumption and services 67%.  Services are dependent on contact; 16% of service consumption is restaurant and recreation.  Add health care, another service that usually requires contact, and the percentage rises to 40%.  Without a reliable way to control the spread of the virus, getting services back will be very difficult.  A vaccine with widespread adoption is the best path to this goal, so, as Chair Powell indicated, the economic recovery is dependent on the virus.

China news:

  • The CPC announced it will hold its central committee meeting in October. Meanwhile, Chairman Xi is holding Politburo meetings about the economy where he is recommending a focus on fostering domestic demand for future growth.  This “pivot” to domestic consumption and away from the dependence on exports and investment has been recommended by economists for years.  The economics of the move are well understood, but the politics are another matter.  There are two problems with this shift politically; first, those who have benefited from the export/investment policy tend to be powerful members of the CPC.  Xi has deliberately purged most opposition but the blowback from harming this powerful group’s economic fortunes is risky.  Second, the transition won’t be easy; households would need to have assets and income moved in their direction and one would expect a lag between receiving that income and assets and increasing consumption.[3]  That would mean slower growth, at least for a while.  And, the CPC has made its mark on delivering growth, so the party’s political image would be harmed by a drop in GDP.
    • With regard to growth, China has returned to its old playbook of investment to lift output. It is pressing state and local governments to borrow.  This may be a short-term fix, but it does highlight how hard it is to break old habits.  It also explains this quarter’s lift in industrial metals prices.
    • Although this reform is likely necessary for China’s development, the proximate cause appears to be due to the deterioration of U.S./China relations.
    • It is also important to remember that China has a long history of cycling between openness and inwardness. The former tends to occur when the government wants faster growth and the latter when it wants political stability.  We may be heading into an “inward” phase.
  • China’s economy does seem to be doing ok. PMI data indicates the expansion continues.
  • Hong Kong legislative elections have been delayed, with leaders blaming COVID-19. A number of pro-democracy candidates have been banned from running.
  • As we have been saying for a while, China continues to lag in its Phase One commitments. At the same time, we are seeing a surge in corn orders, a welcome sign for American farmers.
  • At a hearing before the Senate Foreign Relations Committee, SoS Pompeo indicated that additional measures against China are planned.
  • Lee Teng-hui, Taiwan’s first elected president, died yesterday at age 97.

COVID-19:  The number of reported cases is 17,322,041 with 673,833 deaths and 10,156,580 recoveries.  In the U.S., there are 4,495,224 confirmed cases with 152,075 deaths and 1,414,155 recoveries.  For those who like to keep score at home, the Financial Times has created a nifty interactive chart that allows one to compare cases across nations using similar scaling metrics.  The FT has also issued an economic tracker that looks across countries with high frequency data on various factors.  The Rt data is showing some improvement.  Forty percent of the states have a reading under 1, which would indicate the virus spread should diminish.  On a local note, Missouri has the highest reading in the union, at 1.2.

Virology:

  • Chinese hackers have reportedly targeted Moderna (MRNA, 77.63), one of the leading firms in vaccine research.
  • Sanofi (SNY, 52.50) and GlaxoSmithKline (GSK, 40.25) have made an agreement with the U.S. to provide the vaccine to the U.S.
  • Survivors of COVID-19 are being warned that their infection may not have provided lasting immunity and thus they should exercise care.
  • Former presidential candidate Herman Cain has died from COVID-19.
  • We are seeing the first lawsuits against companies over COVID-19 infections. The GOP has been pressing for protection against such suits, correctly fearing that if companies face legal liability they will simply not reopen.  At the same time, if companies are given blanket protection, they will have no incentive to protect workers.  Finding a midpoint between applying complete immunity and full legal responsibility is an obvious necessity.  One way to thread this needle would be to rely on insurance standards—companies have to engage in various precautionary standards and, if those are met, they are protected from lawsuits.
  • Testing remains a serious problem. As the country has ramped up testing, it has overwhelmed the test processing industry, leading to delays so long as to render the tests nearly useless.  But, to improve the turnaround, we would need to reduce the number of tests.  Without adequate and widespread testing with quick responses, we are mostly “flying blind” regarding the virus.
  • We often hear commentators and political figures speak reverently about science. However, any reading about the history of science will show that science is a method of inquiry.  And it’s a good one.  Following the rules of science will tend to overcome human bias and reach favorable conclusions.  Nevertheless, the process of science isn’t always straightforward and it’s not sacred.  The history of science is littered with positions that were considered “facts” until disputed with new information.[4]  Often, it takes generational change to adjust theoretical understanding.[5]
    • One of the problems with COVID-19 is that we aren’t really sure how it spreads. Initially, it was thought to be spread on surfaces.  Thus, hand washing and mass sanitizing was implemented; this was probably best described as “hygiene theater.”  We all saw the shortages on hand sanitizers and bleach.  But further research indicated that it also probably spreads by droplets.
      • However, even this discovery complicated things. If the dispersion comes from large droplets, they fall to earth by gravity.  This led to the recommendation of being “six feet apart,” or social distancing.
      • At the same time, there is evidence to suggest that much smaller droplets, or “aerosols,” may be the primary spreading vector, meaning that being six feet apart is completely inadequate. These aerosols can be suspended in air for some degree of time and thus being further apart would be necessary.  Instead, the guidance would call for avoiding closed areas and close contact and crowds, especially indoor crowds.  Instead of bleach, we should be considering HEPA filters.
      • It isn’t all bad news. Aerosols don’t last very long outside.  Sunlight can weaken them, and they dissipate in moving air.  There is probably less risk in outdoor activities.  Being indoors, on the other hand, is quite risky.  Mass events and optional mask wearing indoors would present a problem, while walking the dog without a mask is much less risky.
    • The point is, there is much we really don’t know. And that is to be expected.  This is a new virus.  It will take time and research to develop certainty surrounding COVID-19.  Unfortunately, the media does a poor job of reporting on science news, projecting an air of certainty when it isn’t warranted or indicating skepticism when it shouldn’t.
    • So, what should be done? It is important to realize the situation is fluid and that recommendations will change over time.  In finance, we make decisions under conditions of uncertainty all the time.  In the end, all of us have to make probability judgements for which a certain degree of humility is required.

Foreign news:

View PDF


[1] The founder of the Society of Jesus (Jesuits).

[2] This is why the advent of gig work is so interesting.  It allows firms more flexibility in their “inventory.”

[3] The economic theory is called the permanent income hypothesis.  It postulates that households spend based on their income and wealth history.  Thus, if incomes fall but the decline is seen as temporary, spending continues.  If the opposite occurs, wherein a windfall happens, spending doesn’t immediately adjust.

[4] Until 1956, it was generally believed that humans had 48 chromosomes; turns out, we have 46.

[5] “Science progresses one funeral at a time.” — Max Plank

Asset Allocation Weekly (July 31, 2020)

by Asset Allocation Committee | PDF

The pandemic has clearly affected the economy.  The decline in economic activity in Q2 will be historic.  However, it is still unclear what effects will be temporary and what will be long-lasting.  A recent paper suggests that one permanent change may be a reduction in older workers.  COVID-19 has a disproportionately negative impact on older people; studies have shown that nearly 75% of fatalities have occurred among those over the age of 65.  That age falls roughly in the middle of the baby boom generation.  Anyone born in 1955 or earlier falls into this high-risk category.

Americans working past 65 years old, at least as a percentage of the total labor force, was common after WWII.  Social Security was still relatively new.  But, from 1947 to 1985, the participation rate for Americans over the age of 65 fell from the 28.6% peak in October 1949 to a low of 10.4% in June 1984.  The number of Americans in the labor force over the age of 65 peaked at 10.8 MM in February.  It has fallen sharply since.

This chart shows both the actual number of civilians employed over the age of 65 and the percentage of these workers compared to the labor force of 65-year-olds and older.  Participation has been rising since the early 1990s.  Some of this rise is simply due to a rising population of Americans aged 65 years and older relative to the total population.

This chart shows the actual and projected level of 65-year-olds and older compared to the total population.  The percentage has been rising since 2003 and is forecast to plateau in 2040.  The entire baby boom generation will be 65 years or older by the end of the decade.

It is possible that the tendency for COVID-19 to be a greater risk to older workers may mean that the drop in employment for adults 65 and over will be lasting.  These workers have the option of taking Social Security and don’t necessarily need to take the risk of returning to work.  If they do leave the workforce for an extended period, perhaps 18 to 24 months for a widely available vaccine, employers may be less open to hiring this age of worker when a younger one can be found.

What impact would a decline in workers aged 65 and older have?  Since older workers are often paid more due to their years of service, losing these workers will, at least initially, improve margins.  It will almost certainly lead to some increased hiring of younger workers and may accelerate lowering the age of the workforce.  It may also lead these older households to lower the risk in their portfolios by reducing equity positioning.  Of course, given current paltry interest rates on low-risk fixed income, investors striving for yield will be forced to take on equity-like risk at times.  It is still unclear whether the pandemic will lead to a permanent shift, but there is a good chance it will.  Thus, we will continue to monitor this development.

View PDF

Daily Comment (July 30, 2020)

by Bill O’Grady, Thomas Wash, and Patrick Fearon-Hernandez, CFA

[Posted: 9:30 AM EDT] | PDF

It’s GDP day!  It has been well forecast for months that Q2 GDP would be an epic negative.  It turned out to be bad, but not as bad as expected.  GDP fell 32.9% on an annualized basis compared to expectations of a 34.5% decline.  See below for the details.  It’s a risk-off day so far.  We have a plethora of policy news as the Fed held its meeting, the tech giants met with Congress, and the stimulus bill is a mess.  News on China is extensive as well.  We discuss pandemic updates.  The Weekly Energy Update is available.  There is a lot to cover so let’s get to it:

Policy news: 

  • There were no major surprises from the Fed. Rates remain unchanged and QE will continue at $120 billion per month, with $80 billion to Treasuries and $40 billion to mortgages.  As we noted yesterday, the Fed has extended its backstop programs; forex swap lines were also extended.  Overall, the statement was somewhat downbeat, with comments suggesting the pandemic is continuing to weigh on economic activity.  Hence, the FOMC decided to continue its extraordinary support for the economy and financial markets.  There were no dissents to the decision.
  • CEOs of Apple (APPL, 380.16), Google (GOOGL, 1523.51), Facebook (FB, 233.29), and Amazon (AMZN, 3,033.53) all testified remotely in front of the House Antitrust Subcommittee. It would be difficult to describe the testimony as friendlyAnger at the large tech companies is bipartisan, although the reasons for the displeasure are not.  Democrats were upset with the monopolistic behaviors of the firms and their fostering of misinformation; Republicans were angered by censorship of right-wing views.  Social media firms try to hide behind algorithms to suggest their software is unbiased; in reality, the goal is eyeballs on screens, so there is a documented manipulation.
    • It would be difficult to argue that at least three of these firms (GOOGL, FB, AMZN) are not engaging in blatant anti-competitive behavior. They have purchased rivals and duplicated and engaged in predatory pricing actions of products on platforms.  Their ability to generate profits and revenues in any season is probably not possible without market dominance.  Their actions would have already been curtailed under legal standards prior to the mid-1980s.  That hasn’t happened under current standards because it is hard to argue that consumers have been hurt.  However, labor has; we offered a framework in our WGR series last year, “The Economic Triangle: Parts I and II.”  Using that framework, antitrust policy over the past 35 years has aligned the interests of capital and consumers against labor.  The well-documented rise of populism suggests that alignment is probably near an end and new (or a return to pre-1985) antitrust policy is part of that realignment.
    • At the same time, although anger is universal, complaints are not. Democrats are attacking the firms mostly on size and behavior grounds, but the GOP is divided.  The GOP establishment mostly wants social media to not censor right-wing views, while GOP populists are more aligned with Democrats over the market power of these firms.  Look for the tech firms to try to exploit this difference.  Although we do expect these firms will eventually face antitrust actions, it will probably be a while.
  • It is looking increasingly unlikely that a stimulus package will be ready before August 1, when the current measures expire. The GOP is deeply divided.  The White House mostly wants spending and lots of it (although the Chief of Staff may have misgivings), whereas GOP populists want spending too but the establishment wants to slow the rise of the deficit.  If the Senate majority leader wants a bill, he can cobble together a majority with Democrats, but that will hurt his own caucus.  Democrats have already rejected a patch measure.  Some Republicans are offering new programs, meaning consensus is not occurring.  The lack of a plan is likely weighing on market sentiment this morning.

China news:

  • Taiwan has become a flashpoint in U.S./China relations. Beijing is imposing sanctions on Lockheed Martin (LMT, 386.66) over arms sales to Taipei.  Analysts suggest the sanctions are not terribly damaging for the company, but more of a warning shot.  However, the Global Times, a CPC mouthpiece, warned that rare earths could be affected.  China has used its dominance in rare earths before, against Japan over the Senkaku Islands (also referred to as the Diaoyu Islands by China).  The warning by the Global Times suggests that Beijing may return to constraining the supply of rare earths again if tensions escalate.  Rare earths, although not all that rare, are critical to numerous high tech and defense applications.  We are seeing some production outside China, but a cutoff of supply would be a problem.
  • Unemployed graduates are a risk to stability. China is making a particular effort to expand state jobs to absorb new graduates.
  • The recent decision by the U.S. to close China’s consulate in Houston appears to be a signal to China. The U.S. has become aware of how China uses consulates not only for espionage but also for monitoring Chinese nationals and other former citizens.
  • This week’s WGR, along with Part II next week, discusses recent Chinese policy. In next week’s report, we will examine China’s policy from Beijing’s perspective.  We continue to monitor China’s position for insights into future behavior.  We note that Xi’s policy of aggressive confrontation is facing some criticism within the CPC.  In addition, two hawkish generals, Dai Xu[1] and Qiao Liang, have cautioned that the PLA is no match for the U.S. military at this juncture and prompting a war could be catastrophic.  The generals note that:
    • The U.S. has developed a profound hatred for China, which is a new development.
    • The U.S. government’s negotiating stance has changed, becoming aggressive and well beyond what China expected.
      • Although not part of the general’s comments, we note that China hawks within the administration are reported to have made contacts with members of the Biden camp. This would suggest these members of the administration are preparing for the possibility of a change in office and are attempting to establish a policy that will extend beyond 2020.
    • No nation has come to China’s defense, suggesting that either the U.S. is still powerful enough to coerce compliance or, more likely, the rest of the world sees China as a threat and supports U.S. policy.
    • A united front is developing around U.S. policy, not China’s.
    • The U.S. isn’t a paper tiger; it’s a potent one that can inflict damage.
    • The U.S. has remarkable ability to course correct and adjust (democracies are actually pretty good at this).
    • The U.S. is less interested in ideology and values and is more driven by economic interests.
    • It was bad policy to say out loud that China was going to surpass the U.S. (in Xi’s defense, Khrushchev made the same mistake in the 1960s).
    • The U.S. really doesn’t care if it offends other nations; it has lots of allies and doesn’t sacrifice its own interests.
    • China needs to understand it is not the world’s superpower; the U.S. is, and Beijing needs to admit that fact.
    • Don’t talk about “sharing information” with the U.S. Americans see that as intellectual property theft.
    • Elections don’t matter all that much as national strategy lasts beyond whomever is in the White House.
    • You don’t fight the U.S. alone.

These admissions are remarkable.  We doubt these two generals will survive these comments; as we noted, one has already tried to deny them.  But this does show that the triumphalism of President Xi is not universally held.

COVID-19:  The number of reported cases is 17,054,819 with 667,707 deaths and 9,984,590 recoveries.  In the U.S., there are 4,427,493 confirmed cases with 150,716 deaths and 1,389,425 recoveries.  For those who like to keep score at home, the FT has created a nifty interactive chart that allows one to compare cases across nations using similar scaling metrics.  The FT has also issued an economic tracker that looks across countries with high frequency data on various factors.  The weekly Axios map shows an improving situation, with case growth slowing, although here in Missouri things are looking rather ugly.

Virology: 

  • One of the puzzles of COVID-19 has been the wide dispersion of the effects on patients. Many are completely asymptomatic.  As professional sports return and consistent testing of this population ensues, it has been interesting to note how many players test positive without symptoms or conditions so mild they mistake it for a cold.  At the same time, others are severely impaired or fail to survive in infection.  One development vexing doctors are cases where patients appear to have long-term symptoms of the disease but fail to test positive for it.
  • The Sandinista-led government in Nicaragua has been dismissive of COVID-19 and is now persecuting doctors who are calling for measures to reduce the spread of the virus.
  • China is reporting an outbreak of cases in the northeastern regions. Nine cities have reported new cases.
  • Vietnam, which appeared to have completely eradicated the virus, is seeing a return of cases.
  • Johnson & Johnson (JNJ, 146.54) began human trials for a vaccine that protected monkeys.
  • The FDA is expected to rule on convalescent plasma as a treatment.
  • The FBI is investigating claims that China attempted to steal COVID-19 research from the University of Texas.
  • One of the areas of failure has been the inability of policymakers to craft a policy mix that reduces the risk of the virus while protecting the economy. This has been a breakdown along many fronts.  Medical advice has been contradictory at times; face masks were downplayed then recommended.  Initially, there was great worry about the virus on surfaces; now we know most of the spreading is in the air.  At its heart, managing the virus is about probabilities.  What activities are high risk?  Who bears the most risk from contracting the virus?  Humans are not very good at measuring probabilities.  We often fear things that have a low probability of harming us and blithely engage in actions that are rather dangerous (the classic example is the fear of flying when the most dangerous part of the trip is getting to the airport).  Eventually, we will learn to live with this virus and it will likely require some changes in behavior until a vaccine is developed and widely adopted.

Market and Economy news:

Foreign news:

Odds and ends:  Coming to a safe near you…a new metal said to be harder than diamonds.

View PDF


[1] For the record, Dai Xu disavowed his comments on a social media post yesterday.  It’s not clear why, and doesn’t necessarily mean the comments are not a reflection of some within the PLA.

Weekly Energy Update (July 30, 2020)

by Bill O’Grady, Thomas Wash, and Patrick Fearon-Hernandez, CFA | PDF

Here is an updated crude oil price chart.  The oil market has stabilized at higher levels after April’s historic collapse.

(Source: Barchart.com)

Crude oil inventories unexpectedly fell, declining 10.6 mb compared to forecasts of a 1.0 mb rise.  The SPR was unchanged this week.

In the details, U.S. crude oil production was steady at 11.1 mbpd.  Exports rose 0.2 mbpd, while imports fell 0.8 mbpd.  Refining activity rose 1.6%, well above expectations.  The drop in imports may have been affected by tropical storm activity; if so, we should see a rebound next week.

Unaccounted-for crude oil is a balancing item in the weekly energy balance sheet.  To make the data balance, this line item is a plug figure, but that doesn’t mean it doesn’t matter.  This week’s number is +43 kbpd.  Although this is one week’s report, stabilization would suggest the DOE is getting a better handle on production and inventory.

(Sources: DOE, CIM)

The above chart shows the annual seasonal pattern for crude oil inventories.  This week’s data showed a decline in crude oil stockpiles.  We are well into the seasonal draw for crude oil.  By this time of the summer, we have usually seen a 5% decline in commercial storage.  The fact that inventories are mostly steady is a bearish factor.

Based on our oil inventory/price model, fair value is $31.95; using the euro/price model, fair value is $56.08.  The combined model, a broader analysis of the oil price, generates a fair value of $44.17.  The wide divergence continues between the EUR and oil inventory models.  As the trend in the dollar rolls over, it is bullish for crude oil.  Any supportive news on reducing the inventory overhang could be very bullish for crude oil.

After a steady recovery since the trough in late April, gasoline consumption has stalled.  We suspect this is related to the surge in COVID-19 infections; if it continues, it is a bearish factor for crude oil prices.

In energy news, U.S. oil companies are reporting a return of production as shale output returns.  Although it is unlikely that we will see a return to the peak levels of production for a while, the backlog of “drilled but uncompleted” wells offer ample opportunity for rising oil production.

The DOE has updated its data for April (the official data has a rather long lag), and as one would expect the decline in consumption of energy was historic, falling to three-decade lows.  Petroleum consumption fell to its lowest level since 1983 and coal consumption declined to its lowest level since the DOE began collecting data.

Russia has been supporting Gen. Haftar in Libya.  A “private” mercenary group, based in Russia, known as the Wagner Group, has captured Libya’s largest oil field and the Es Sider export facility.  There are increasing concerns that Russia’s proxies are moving to take full control of Libya’s oil industry.  Libya is becoming a new point of friction between the U.S. and Russia.  The primary opposition to Russia’s aims in Libya is Turkey, which is supporting Islamist groups in the country.

VP Biden’s energy policy has led to concerns in the energy sector that he will support an aggressive “green” policy.  However, in his plans for climate, we note a call for increased funding for carbon capture.  A successful carbon capture regime would support both coal and natural gas.  Although a Biden presidency would not be considered friendly for the energy sector, it is also possible that the outcome may not be as dire as some might suspect (and also disappointing for left-wing populists).  We note that oil and gas groups have suggested there is “common ground” in the Biden energy plan.

Carbon credits, a European market that allows firms to trade carbon emissions, has become a significant bull market.  The rising price of credits is putting pressure on European coal.

View PDF

Daily Comment (July 29, 2020)

by Bill O’Grady, Thomas Wash, and Patrick Fearon-Hernandez, CFA

[Posted: 9:30 AM EDT] | PDF

Investors today are hoping for more clarity on future monetary policy after the Federal Reserve finishes its latest policy meeting.  Also in Washington, top tech firm executives are being grilled remotely by a House antitrust committee regarding the market dominance of their online platforms.  Finally, we note signs that both the EU and Japan may be swinging toward the U.S. administration’s “Tough on China” policy, which could have a significant impact on global stock markets in the coming years.  After reviewing the latest coronavirus news, we examine these developments and others below.

COVID-19:  Official data show confirmed cases have risen to 16,762,605 worldwide, with 661,012 deaths and 9,771,236 recoveries.  In the United States, confirmed cases rose to 4,352,304, with 149,260 deaths and 1,355,363 recoveries.  Here is the interactive chart from the Financial Times that allows you to compare cases and deaths among countries, scaled by population.

Virology

U.S. Policy Response

European Union-China:  The EU announced it will impose sanctions on China over the new security law it has imposed on Hong Kong.  The sanctions include limiting exports of equipment that China could use for repression and reassessing extradition arrangements with Beijing.  The move is notable because EU governments have sometimes been reluctant to put their Chinese export markets at risk.  If EU governments are now becoming more convinced of China’s geopolitical, military, and economic threats, they may eventually adopt a “Tough on China” policy like the one developing in the U.S.  If such a conflict arises between the broader West and China, new anti-China capital regulations and other measures could be especially negative for Chinese assets.

Japan-China:  Adding to the evidence that the developed democracies could be coalescing around a “Tough on China” policy, China hawks in Japan also appear to be gaining influence and are pushing Prime Minister Abe to take a harder line on Beijing.

China-Hong Kong:  Prominent pro-democracy campaigner Benny Tai was fired from his job as an associate law professor at the University of Hong Kong based on his participation in a 2014 protest.  The move illustrates how academic freedoms in the city are becoming constricted as China asserts its authority.  Separately, Hong Kong officials drew a rebuke from the U.S., the U.K., and Australia after they said they may postpone their September legislative elections for up to one year due to the city’s recent rebound in coronavirus cases.

United States:  The chief executives of several major U.S. technology firms including Amazon.com (AMZN, 3,000.33), Apple (AAPL, 373.01), Facebook (FB, 230.12), and Google (GOOG, 1,500.34) are being hauled before the House Antitrust Subcommittee today to be grilled on the market dominance of their online platforms.  With politicians across the political spectrum signaling their displeasure with the companies, for various reasons, there is a risk that tough questioning of the CEOs could spook investors in the tech sector.

United States:  Presumptive Democratic nominee for president Joe Biden issued a plan to tackle racial inequality that would include pushing the Federal Reserve to monitor and target gaps in employment, wage rates, and wealth.  The proposal would “require the Fed to regularly report on current data and trends in racial economic gaps—and what actions the Fed is taking through its monetary and regulatory policies to close these gaps.”  However, the plan stops short of calling for the Fed to directly target the unemployment rates of Black and Hispanic communities, instead of the U.S. average, as has been backed by some economists (including Jared Bernstein, one of Biden’s economic advisers while he served as vice president).

View PDF

Daily Comment (July 28, 2020)

by Bill O’Grady, Thomas Wash, and Patrick Fearon-Hernandez, CFA

[Posted: 9:30 AM EDT] | PDF

Even if the U.S. opening is looking a bit soft today, investors should be encouraged by an apparent stabilization in new U.S. coronavirus cases and the release (after considerable delay) of Senate Republicans’ proposal for a new coronavirus relief bill.  We outline both news items and all the other key developments below.

COVID-19:  Official data show confirmed cases have risen to 16,495,309 worldwide, with 654,327 deaths and 9,590,929 recoveries.  In the United States, confirmed cases rose to 4,294,270, with 148,056 deaths and 1,325,804 recoveries.  Here is the interactive chart from the Financial Times that allows you to compare cases and deaths among countries, scaled by population.

Virology:

Economic Impact:

  • Consultants at Accenture (ACN, 223.32) estimate that U.S. bank profits will be hit twice as hard by coronavirus loan loss provisions than their European peers, in a study that upends the traditional wisdom of European banks’ relative weakness.  The consultants foresee $427 billion in loan loss charges for 58 top U.S. banks over the next three years, equal to about 10.2% of their average 2020 loan books.  The 50 top European banks in the study are expected to take loan loss charges of $455 billion over the same period, equal to just 4.6% of their 2020 loan balances.
  • Adding to the various letter-designated scenarios for the post-crisis economic recovery, some people are now talking about a “K-shaped” rebound.  The idea is to capture the way that many people with white-collar jobs and financial investments are actually doing all right, while the many who work in low-paying service jobs and don’t have stocks or bonds are struggling to survive.

U.S. Policy Response:

  • Late yesterday, Senate Republicans finally released their proposal for the next coronavirus relief bill.  In comparison with the $3.5 trillion proposal passed weeks ago by Democrats in the House, the Republican proposal would cost about $1.0 trillion, setting up what is likely to be weeks of negotiations with the House and raising the risk of a deadlock or severely watered down bill that would likely drive down equity markets.  Key elements of the Republican proposal would:
    • Send another $1,200 check to the same group that received cash this spring (with payments phasing out for individuals with income above $75,000 and married couples with income above $150,000);
    • Provide an additional payment of $500 for each child, defined more broadly than last spring to include dependents over the age of 16 (meaning a bigger payment for parents of college students and people who take care of their elderly parents);
    • Extend the supplemental federal unemployment benefit, but cut it from the current $600 per week as follows:
      • Through September, the benefit would be cut to $200 per week for each recipient;
      • From October to XXX, the benefit would be set so that the sum of federal and state benefits would replace 70% of the recipient’s previous wage;
    • Provide $105 billion to schools and universities to cover the costs of operating during the pandemic, with some of the aid only available to schools that plan to physically reopen;
    • Provide no additional aid to state and local governments, but provide more flexibility in using existing federal assistance;
    • Provide $16 billion for expanded coronavirus testing;
    • Expand a worker-retention tax credit created in March, allowing larger credits per worker and letting up to $30,000 of wages and benefits qualify instead of just $10,000;
    • Temporarily give businesses a 100% tax deduction for restaurant meals, up from the current 50% deduction;
    • Adjust liability rules to make it harder to successfully sue schools, businesses and healthcare providers in coronavirus-related cases;
    • Provide for a number of other initiatives, some of which cynics might call “porkbarrel” (no surprise there!).

Foreign Policy Response:

  • To help ensure Eurozone banks can absorb losses and keep lending through the crisis, the ECB has called on lenders to keep foregoing dividend payments until at least January and be “extremely moderate” when setting staff bonuses.  The Bank of England said it would carry out a review in the fourth quarter over whether British lenders could resume paying dividends in 2021.

Financial Market Action:

United States:  Citing concern that economist Judy Shelton isn’t committed to the Federal Reserve’s independence, Senator Susan Collins (R., Maine) said she would join with Senator Mitt Romney (R., Utah) in opposing Shelton’s nomination to the Fed board of governors.  Since the Republicans only have a 53-47 vote advantage in the Senate, Shelton can’t afford to lose more than three Republicans if all Democrats oppose her candidacy.  Separately, the Fed will begin its latest policy-setting meeting today.  The policymakers are widely expected to hold current policy steady, but their post-meeting statement tomorrow could hold some clues on how they expect policy to evolve in the future.

United States-China:  State governments and the Department of Agriculture are investigating reports that hundreds of U.S. residents have been mailed unsolicited seeds from China.  The seeds raise the specter of a deliberate effort to spread toxic, noxious or invasive plants or weeds in the U.S. (a mild form of biological warfare?), so officials have warned people not to plant them.

New Zealand-Hong Kong-China:  The New Zealand government announced that it would suspend its extradition treaty with Hong Kong, joining the U.S., the U.K., Canada and Australia in protesting Beijing’s draconian new security law for the city.  The move is more evidence that the “Five Eyes” intelligence-sharing alliance could be evolving into the leading coalition against Chinese expansionism.

Russia:  Thousands of demonstrators in the far eastern city of Khabarovsk yesterday continued to demand the release of their jailed governor, Sergei Furgal.  The protests suggest the city’s protestors haven’t been mollified by President Putin’s naming of a replacement governor from Furgal’s opposition party.

Russia-Ukraine:  Beginning yesterday, Ukrainian troops and Russian-backed rebels in eastern Ukraine implemented a new ceasefire.  However, frictions remain because of issues such as Russia’s annexation of the Crimean peninsula and Kiev’s plan to exclude rebel territory from an upcoming election.

Japan-South Korea:  The Japanese government has warned of another sharp deterioration in Japanese-South Korean relations because of recently erected statues in a South Korean park that depict a man resembling Prime Minister Shinzo Abe kneeling and bowing to a girl symbolizing South Korean “comfort women” in World War II.

View PDF

Weekly Geopolitical Report – Rethinking China: Part I (July 27, 2020)

by Bill O’Grady | PDF

President and General Secretary Xi Jingping has changed the course of Chinese governance.  Deng Xiaoping Peng created a collective leadership model to prevent the rise of another Mao.  Leaders were carefully selected and surrounded by leading figures of the various factions of the Communist Party of China (CPC).  Term limits were put in place to restrict a President/General Secretary to two five-year terms. Deng established a structure of government which was somewhat decentralized.  Cults of personality were discouraged.

Xi Jinping has reversed these measures.  He has ended the restrictions on term limits.  The Standing Committee of the Politburo is mostly composed of allies.  Instead of using the structure of government that diffused power, Xi has created a series of informal committees that actually execute policy; this gives him nearly complete control of the government.  “Xi Jinping thought” is now discussed in party and academic circles; although no one has bound them into a little red book, it would not be a surprise if that were to occur.

Xi is also changing China’s foreign policy.  Under Deng, foreign policy was all about “hide your ambitions and disguise your claws.”  Under Xi, foreign policy has been more assertive.  However, over the past 18 months, we have seen aggressive and, perhaps more importantly, widespread actions.  China seems to be willing to create tensions across a broad spectrum, which does appear to be a new development.

There are two broad themes to this report.  In Part I, we will frame China’s situation using Japan as an analog.  In Part II, we will continue the analog, discuss recent Chinese aggression and offer a detailed analysis of the potential motivations of Chinese and U.S. policymakers.  As always, we will conclude the discussion with potential market ramifications.

Read the full report

Daily Comment (July 27, 2020)

by Bill O’Grady, Thomas Wash, and Patrick Fearon-Hernandez, CFA

[Posted: 9:30 AM EDT] | PDF

Happy Monday!  Baseball is back, and the NHL and NBA are close as well.  Our friends on the Texas coast had to cope with Hurricane Hanna over the weekend.  Equity markets are moving higher, the dollar is softening and the bull trend in gold is starting to accelerate.  This is one of the busiest weeks for Q2 earnings.  We lead with policy news, followed by the pandemic update.  Let’s get to it:

Policy news: 

  • The GOP will unveil its stimulus plan today, but internal dissention is running high. It isn’t clear the Senate could pass this bill with GOP votes alone, even though the party is in the majority.  The White House wanted a payroll tax cut, but it doesn’t look like that provision made it.  There is a debate over the $600 per week extra unemployment benefit.  There is no doubt that some workers are staying home because unemployment insurance pays about the same or better than any job available.  However, the problem with drastically reducing this benefit is that for those workers without any job available, the proposed reduction to 75% of their previous wage will lead to a drop in spending.
    • The last JOLTS report suggests that the inability to attract workers may not be as big of an impediment as the anecdotal evidence would suggest. In May, hires outpaced openings, 6.487 million to 5.397 million.  What is probably happening is that lower paid jobs in the service industries are struggling to get their workers back under current unemployment insurance provisions.  But, if you cut the insurance payments, not every laid-off worker may be able to find a job (openings were running 7.0 million prior to the pandemic).
    • The mere threat to reduce the $600 per week supplement could lead lower paid households to try to save as much as possible before the aid is restricted. If the goal of the extra cash is to support spending, this precautionary saving works against that aim.
  • We suspect the financial markets are looking through the current political morass and expecting the Democrats to dictate terms, meaning we will likely see a total package of $1.5 trillion to $2.0 trillion.
  • Congress isn’t the only body dealing with stimulus policy. The Fed meets this week and is trying to chart a path forward.  We don’t expect any new measures to be announced but the internal debate will be important.  Namely, the Fed will try to figure out how to explain any changes to its reaction function; in English, that’s how long will the Fed wait to react to higher price levels.  Since Volcker, the policy has been to react pre-emptively to potential inflation.  That policy was designed for a period of elevated inflation expectations.  That period is probably behind us, so allowing inflation to overshoot becomes stimulative.  Exactly how to do that remains uncertain.
  • But wait…there’s more. Tech leaders are visiting Capitol Hill on Wednesday to testify before the House Antitrust Committee.  We don’t expect much more than posturing at this meeting, but if there is a threat to big tech, antitrust is perhaps the most potent.  Since the mid-1980s, the operating theory of antitrust has been that if consumers are not harmed, size or market control alone should not trigger regulatory action.  The tech firms have taken this legal theory to heart and have become behemoths, sometimes through mergers, other times through predatory behavior.  Nevertheless, it is clear that consumers have faced little harm.  So, who has paid the cost of their behavior?  Labor, from Steve Jobs’s plan to avoid “poaching” other tech workers (a clear plan to suppress wages) to tales of harsh working conditions at some tech companies.  A new antitrust era is likely coming, but it won’t necessarily be bad for shareholders (although such reports will become more common as the situation evolves).  The breakup of Standard Oil proved to be a huge benefit for shareholders as the value of the company in parts was greater than as a whole.  However, it is possible that the fear of regulation could adversely affect the tech giants and, given their dominance in the indexes, a negative impact is possible.
  • Finally, although it isn’t happening here yet, the U.K. is already starting to discuss what to do with the bad debt that will come from loan programs to support companies in the pandemic. Some of the companies that have been supported will fail; how the bad debt is handled will be interesting to watch.  Will the bad debt remain on bank balance sheets?  Will a “bad bank,” such as the Resolution Trust Corporation, be created?  Will the government simply socialize the debt?  Stay tuned.

COVID-19:  The number of reported cases is 16,264,048 with 648,966 deaths and 9,407,977 recoveries.   In the U.S., there are 4,234,140 confirmed cases with 146,935 deaths and 1,297,863 recoveries.  For those who like to keep score at home, the FT has created an interactive chart that allows one to compare cases across nations using similar scaling metrics.

Virology: 

  • North Korea has instituted an aggressive lockdown at the border city of Kaesong after a COVID-19 infection was reported. This would be the country’s first confirmed case.  A former defector apparently decided to return to North Korea; Pyongyang has indicated that the person was infected, but South Korean officials, who have a strong contact tracing regime in place, indicate that he was not carrying the virus.  It isn’t clear if South Korea is wrong on the infection status, or whether North Korea, which probably does have cases, is using this as a way to reveal it has infections and thus blame Seoul for the outbreak.
  • New cases are springing up in areas that had previously brought the virus under control. The rise in new cases is disappointing, suggesting that it was lockdowns, and not herd immunity, that was keeping caseloads low.
  • The vaccine news is a mixed bag:
    • There are numerous areas in the U.S. where the virus is spreading rapidly. Paradoxically, that could accelerate vaccine trials, which need a large population to test and to be surrounded with infections to determine potency.  If a vaccine is tested in an area with few infections, it is more difficult to know if the vaccine is effective.
    • Given the huge number of vaccines being tested, it seems likely that one of them will prove to work. However, as we have noted earlier, one of the great unknowns is how long the immunity will last.  Sadly, that may simply be an “empirical question,” where we will need to see if those who have been vaccinated become ill six months to a year later.  The key to longer-term immunity will be the T and B cells.
    • History tells us that getting a vaccine is an important step but doesn’t fully end the crisis. Until it is widely distributed and time passes, we won’t know for sure how long the immunity lasts.  Anti-vaccine resistance is strong and will slow the development of herd immunity.  The government will need to determine the order of distribution; if they get it wrong, it could reduce the effectiveness of the campaign.  However, it is worth noting that markets tend to discount the future and will likely look past these problems, which could lead to a further disconnect between the economy and financial markets.

Foreign news:

Market and Economy news:

China news:

View PDF