Weekly Energy Update (May 21, 2020)

by Bill O’Grady, Thomas Wash, and Patrick Fearon-Hernandez, CFA

Here is an updated crude oil price chart.  The oil market continues to show signs of recovery.

(Source: Barchart.com)

One interesting development has been in open interest.  Open interest is the number of open contracts in a futures market.  Most of the time, the highest open interest in the calendar of contracts is the nearby or the second nearby, when the first nearby is near expiration.  However, currently the contract with the highest open interest is for December delivery.  Investors are taking the stance that oil prices are likely to rise in the future due to the combination of improving economic growth and falling output.  However, as the debacle recently witnessed in the oil ETFs showed, the nearest contracts are subject to wild price swings due to the lack of storage.  Thus, it appears speculators and investors are moving to the longer-dated contracts to execute positions to avoid the problems inherent in the nearby contracts.  The drawback with this strategy is that, under conditions of contango, the deferred prices are higher than the nearby.  However, this disadvantage has narrowed recently.  As the chart below shows, the July/December spread fell to nearly -10.00 per barrel in late April; it has narrowed to under -2.00 per barrel recently.  Thus, the carrying cost of holding the deferred contract has become less onerous.

Crude oil inventories surprised the markets for the second straight week by falling 5.0 mb compared to the forecast rise of 2.0 mb.

In the details, U.S. crude oil production fell 0.1 mbpd to 11.5 mbpd.  Exports fell 0.3 mbpd, while imports fell 0.2 mbpd.  Refining activity rose 1.5%, in line with expectations.  As we saw last week, there was another jump in unaccounted-for crude oil.

Unaccounted-for crude oil is a balancing item in the weekly energy balance sheet.  To make the data balance, this line item is a plug figure; but that doesn’t mean it doesn’t matter.  This week’s number of -998 kbpd is the largest negative number on record.  It may mean that in the scramble for finding storage, some oil is being inventoried outside the survey system.  In other words, over the week, some 6.9 mb of crude oil went into storage somewhere, just not where it can be recorded.  Or, production is falling much faster than the DOE estimates are capturing so there aren’t any missing barrels; simply put, production is cratering.  We are leaning toward the first explanation, but if inventories don’t rise in the coming weeks the second theory would become more plausible.  The second factor is that the SPR rose 1.9 mb as some of the oil went into the strategic reserve.

(Sources: DOE, CIM)

The above chart shows the annual seasonal pattern for crude oil inventories.  This week’s data, with the caveats expressed in the discussion about the unaccounted-for crude oil, suggests the worst of the inventory accumulation is behind us.

Based on our oil inventory/price model, fair value is $30.89; using the euro/price model, fair value is $44.26.  The combined model, a broader analysis of the oil price, generates a fair value of $36.88.  As we noted recently, the model output is less relevant as there is a non-linearity tied to the loss of storage capacity that cannot be fully captured with these models.  At the same time, if storage remains available, the models would suggest further upside for oil prices.

Although consumption remains depressed, there are reports that driving is starting to recover as lockdown rules ease.  The gasoline supplied data on the chart below also continues to show improvement.  Some data tracking does suggest an upswing in driving activity.

The market news for the week was mixed.  As we noted above, demand does appear to be improving, but prices remain depressed and production will likely continue to fall.  The Dallas FRB has produced research suggesting the net effect of the oil bear market has been negative for the economy, a major reversal from past years, reflecting the growing importance of oil production to the overall economy.  Meanwhile, it is possible the U.S. will restrict Chinese oil firms from buying U.S. oil companies.  And, in a first, the U.S. is on track to generate more electricity from renewables compared to coal.

On the geopolitical front, we are seeing the U.S. and Iran ease tensions.  Washington appears to be ignoring Iran’s trading with Venezuela, for example.  We suspect Tehran does not want to trigger a conflict before the election, a move that might actually boost support for President Trump.  Saudi Arabia is trying to balance the goals of economic restructuring with the loss of revenue due to falling oil pricesArgentina has set a domestic price of $45 per barrel to protect domestic producers.

View the PDF

Daily Comment (May 20, 2020)

by Bill O’Grady, Thomas Wash, and Patrick Fearon-Hernandez, CFA

[Posted: 9:30 AM EDT]

Today’s U.S. market strength stems in part from earnings reports showing many companies have been able to adjust relatively well to the coronavirus challenges, albeit with higher costs.  Adding to the positive vibe is news that all 50 states have now relaxed their coronavirus lockdowns, although remaining restrictions vary widely.  Overseas, officials also continue to loosen their lockdowns, or contemplate doing so, including several large developing countries where infections are still rising.  As always, we review all the key pandemic and related news below.

Additionally, our latest podcast episode, “The Lessons of History,” is available, which examines the economic, market and social effects of earlier pandemics.

COVID-19:  Official data show confirmed cases have risen to 4,922,137 worldwide, with 323,855 deaths and 1,706,539 recoveries.  In the United States, confirmed cases rose to 1,528,661, with 91,938 deaths and 289,322 recoveries.  Here is the interactive chart from the Financial Times that allows you to compare cases and deaths among countries, scaled by population.

Virology

Real Economy

Financial Markets

Political Impact

China-Taiwan:  In her second inaugural address today, Taiwanese President Tsai Ing-wen reiterated her rejection of China’s efforts to assimilate the island, but she also offered to work with Chinese leader Xi Jinping to stabilize relations in ways that respect Taiwan’s democracy and sovereignty—conditions that China has previously rejected.  To bolster Taiwan’s ability to resist Chinese coercion, she also pledged to further revamp the economy, strengthen the military and deepen ties with friendly countries.  After U.S. Secretary of State Pompeo offered his congratulations to Tsai, the Chinese ministries of foreign affairs, defense, and Taiwan relations lashed out at him for interfering in China’s internal affairs, highlighting today’s increased friction in U.S.-China relations.

United States-China:  More broadly, the increased U.S.-China bickering over trade, the coronavirus and Taiwan are signs that the two countries continue to struggle with the “Thucydides Trap,” or the tension caused when an incumbent power seeking to preserve its position is challenged by a rising power seeking to gain what it perceives to be its rightful place in the world.  As we’ve discussed in the past, this type of situation can eventually lead to military conflict if not managed well.  Reflecting the current defense-oriented stance of the U.S., Senator Josh Hawley (R-Mo.) will lambaste China on the Senate floor today, arguing that the international order must be ripped up to avoid America taking “second place to the imperialists in Beijing.”  Separately, the U.S. Air Force has ramped up flyovers of B-1B Lancer bombers over waters near China, complementing increased military operations by both the U.S. Navy and Air Force in the South China Sea, East China Sea, the Taiwan Strait and the Yellow Sea.

View the complete PDF

Daily Comment (May 19, 2020)

by Bill O’Grady, Thomas Wash, and Patrick Fearon-Hernandez, CFA

[Posted: 9:30 AM EDT]

The generally positive trend in risk markets today comes as coronavirus restrictions continue to be lifted around the world and scientists continue to make progress in understanding the virus, coming up with treatments and developing vaccines.  We review all the key news below.

Additionally, our next podcast episode, “The Lessons of History,” is now available. This episode examines the economic, market and social effects of earlier pandemics.  Although the Black Death is mentioned, we focus on relatively recent events, including the Spanish influenza.  One of our themes has been an impending reversal in the equality/efficiency cycle; in this podcast we discuss the potential that the pandemic could accelerate the shift to an equality phase.

COVID-19: Official data show confirmed cases have risen to 4,829,232 worldwide, with 319,031 deaths and 1,801,461 recoveries.  In the United States, confirmed cases rose to 1,508,957, with 90,369 deaths and 283,178 recoveries.  Here is the interactive chart from the Financial Times that allows you to compare cases and deaths among countries, scaled by population.

Virology

  • As the aircraft carrier USS Theodore Roosevelt prepares to depart Guam following a two-week layover because of a COVID-19 outbreak, reports indicate some crew members have come down with the disease for a second time.  Defense officials didn’t know whether some of the tests had produced false negative readings, or whether the sailors had contracted the virus after spending two weeks in quarantine in Guam.  Either way, the news serves as a reminder that scientists still don’t know for sure whether being infected by the virus leads to future immunity.
  • On the other hand, South Korean health officials found that a group of patients who tested positive a second time for the coronavirus hadn’t passed the disease on to others, lending credence to the possibility that the suspected relapses were a fluke of testing rather than the re-emergence of an active infection.

Real Economy

U.S. Policy Response

Foreign Policy Response

  • German Chancellor Merkel and French President Macron proposed a new, €500-billion coronavirus recovery fund for the EU, boosting hopes for a coordinated European fiscal response to the pandemic.  The funds would be raised by the European Commission borrowing on capital markets — which to date has only been done on a relatively modest scale — and would be used to provide grants funneled through the EU budget rather than loans to national governments.  To be implemented, the plan would need to be approved by all 27 member states at an upcoming EU summit.
    • The plan would move the EU farther toward common debt obligations than it has ever gone before, but it still falls short of the massive grant program funded by joint “coronabonds” that some hard-hit countries in the south have demanded.
    • At the same time, the plan has already met resistance by some creditor nations north of the EU – including the Netherlands, Denmark and Sweden – who oppose any mutualization of debt and any reliance on grants instead of loans.
    • Despite the plan’s uncertain future, it should be a positive for European stocks and bonds.  Indeed, bonds issued by hard-hit, highly indebted countries such as Italy and Spain are rallying on the news so far today.

Political Impact

View the complete PDF

Weekly Geopolitical Report – The Geopolitics of the 2020 Election: Part I (May 18, 2020)

by Bill O’Grady | PDF

(NB:  Due to the Memorial Day holiday, the next report will be published on June 1.)

In our geopolitical outlook for 2020,[1] our most important issue was the 2020 elections.  In general, U.S. presidential elections are geopolitical issues because of America’s hegemonic status.  In an era where the U.S. is changing its position on hegemony, who resides in the White House may be unusually important.  Therefore, foreign governments have an incentive to affect the outcome in November.

Due to the importance of this issue, we have written a five-part report, broken into nine sections.  The sections are as follows:

  1. The Basics of Public Finance: We look at the economics of public goods, the problem of free-riding and the role of the political process in allocation costs and benefits.
  2. Understanding the Electorate: We examine the intersection of identity and class, which create groups, and introduce the Zeihan Grid to graphically show how they interact.
  3. Party Coalitions: In a two-party system, parties are essentially coalitions of groups that change over time.
  4. The Incidence of Current Policy: We show how the policies designed to dampen inflation have acted to harm the lower income classes.
  5. The Role of Social Media: Media is always important to the political process and social media has changed how the parties act.
  6. Who will win? We handicap the race between President Trump and VP Biden (spoiler alert—we are leaning toward Biden due to the current recession).
  7. Foreign Behavior: This section examines the capabilities and leanings of major foreign nations with regard to swaying the election.
  8. The Base Cases: We consider the outcome based on who wins the election.
  9. Ramifications: We conclude with the likely market effects from the election.

Read the full report


[1] The 2020 Geopolitical Outlook, 12/16/19

Daily Comment (May 18, 2020)

by Bill O’Grady, Thomas Wash, and Patrick Fearon-Hernandez, CFA

[Posted: 9:30 AM EDT]

Good morning and happy Monday!  Equity markets are on a tear this morning, and oil is also higher.  Reports that vaccine trials are going well are boosting stocks.  There wasn’t much news on China overnight, which probably accounts for some of the lift.  We update the COVID-19 news.  Here is what we are watching:

COVID-19: The number of reported cases is 4,730,968 with 315,488 deaths and 1,739,890 recoveries.  In the U.S., there are 1,417,889 confirmed cases with 89,564 deaths and 246,414 recoveries.

For those who like to keep score at home, the FT has created a nifty interactive chart that allows one to compare cases and fatalities between nations, scaled by population.  It also has a chart showing global lockdowns.

The virus news:

  • The good news:
    • We are seeing a global reopening of economies, although, as one would expect, some new clusters of infections are being reported. In the media, the reopening debate is often pitted as health vs. the economy.  However, this binary position lacks necessary nuance.  A recent paper on the Nordic response concludes that mandated shutdowns had less of an impact on the economy compared to the virus itself.  In other words, just because lockdowns are lifted doesn’t mean that recovery follows rapidly.  People remain selective on what activities they will engage in based on perceptions of risk.
    • Vaccine research continues at a rapid pace. A reliable vaccine is the fastest way the world will return to any semblance of normal.
    • Italy has reopened its borders and suspended quarantines for visitors.
  • The bad news:
    • As we have been documenting for some time, the range of effects from COVID-19 infection varies widely. Large numbers appear to have either very mild cases or are completely asymptomatic.  Others are struck with a variety of maladies, including blood clotting, organ failure, etc.  Even months after recovery, some victims continue to report effects from the disease.
    • In the U.S., COVID-19 cases are now rising in rural areas as the crisis starts to dissipate in the urban centers. Unfortunately, the medical systems often lack resource depth and thus may have higher risk of fatalities.  A larger elderly population increases that risk.

The policy news:

The finance news:

The economic news:

The foreign news:

Brexit: Last week, we reported that trade talks between the EU and Britain were not going well.  It would appear the most logical outcome is an extension to give negotiators more time to develop a trade agreement.  However, PM Johnson has expressly ruled out asking for one.  This situation raises worries that a hard Brexit may be coming.  One possibility to avoid such an outcome would be a conditional extension, allowing both sides to continue talking without asking for a formal extension.  This is exactly the kind of “fudge” or “can-kicking” action that the EU does best.  The financial markets, especially the GBP, have been worried about a hard break, and the potential for a conditional extension reduces that likelihood.

View the complete PDF

Asset Allocation Weekly (May 15, 2020)

by Asset Allocation Committee

As the Federal Reserve expands its balance sheet and the federal deficit balloons, there is a legitimate concern about the potential for inflation.  In this week’s report, we will examine inflation from a theoretical perspective.

There are two simple tools we use to discuss inflation, the equation of exchange and the intersection of aggregate supply and demand.  To start, this is the equation of exchange:

MV=PQ

M is the money supply and V represents the speed at which it is spent; on the other side of the equation is P, the price level, and Q, output.  In the calculation of the variables, the right side of the equation is nominal GDP and M is one of the various formulations of the money supply.  However, the power of the equation, in our opinion, comes from what the variables represent.  For example, Q is best thought of as the productive capacity of the economy, the ability of an economy to procure goods and services.  It would include not just actual production, but also excess capacity.  And V isn’t just a residual; it can tell us the effectiveness of money policy.

The classical economists assumed that V and Q were fixed; V represented the institutional structure of money demand and thus only changed when spending and income patterns were adjusted.  Since prices were flexible, Q was always at full employment and thus didn’t change.  If these assumptions were true, any increase in M would lead to a proportional rise in P.  However, it turns out neither V nor Q were fixed; in some periods, increasing M led to higher price levels, but in others, it did not.

In the last episode of the Federal Reserve balance sheet expansion, velocity fell, leaving prices and quantity mostly unchanged.

This chart shows calculated velocity and the Fed’s balance sheet.  The gray shaded areas indicate periods of official QE.  Note that there is a strong inverse correlation between velocity and the balance sheet expansion, suggesting that households and businesses are not demanding the funds being provided to the banking system.  Thus, the inflationary impact of expansionary monetary policy has been reduced.  Given current risks in the economy and markets, we would expect the current balance sheet expansion to lead to a similar result in the short run—another decline in velocity.

The second tool is aggregate supply and aggregate demand.  Although neither of these can be calculated with any degree of confidence, we can use the tools for illustration.

The key point to this schematic lies in the supply curves, labeled S, S1 and S2.  The latter is what we believe is our current supply curve; demand has shifted from D to D1.  One of the consequences of COVID-19 is that we expect the trend toward deglobalization to accelerate, which would likely mean a shift in the supply curve from S2 to S1.  As deglobalization is eventually tied to reregulation of the economy, we will shift to S.  Of course, the key to rising prices will be the path of demand.  The longer it takes for demand to recover, the less likely it is that inflation will return with any significance.  However, when demand returns, we will likely see upward price pressures; if rising demand coincides with the eventual shift to the terminal supply curve S, the markets could be in for a notable inflation surprise.  We don’t expect this terminal shift to occur in the next three years, but it is highly likely in the latter half of the decade.

Tying this back to the equation of exchange, the supply curves above are represented by Q.  So, as supply becomes increasingly constrained, velocity will need to fall further in order for prices to remain steady as the money supply rises.  If inflation expectations change, it would be reasonable to expect velocity to increase, which would tend to lead to higher inflation.  The key points from this analysis are that (a) Fed policy actions, in isolation, are not necessarily inflationary, and (b) constraining supply, which is an element of deglobalization, could lead to higher price levels once demand recovers.

View the PDF

Daily Comment (May 15, 2020)

by Bill O’Grady, Thomas Wash, and Patrick Fearon-Hernandez, CFA

[Posted: 9:30 AM EDT]

Good morning and happy Friday!  Equity markets are weaker after a rather robust recovery yesterday.  Trade worries appear to be a problem.  We update the COVID-19 news.  Retail sales are out this morning—details below.  Here is what we are watching:

COVID-19: The number of reported cases is 4,444,670 with 302,493 deaths and 1,588,858 recoveries.  In the U.S., there are 1,417,889 confirmed cases with 85,906 deaths and 246,414 recoveries.  For those who like to keep score at home, the FT has created a nifty interactive chart that allows one to compare cases and fatalities between nations, scaled by population.

The virus news:

  • The good news:
    • Japan has lifted its state of emergency in 39 of the nation’s 47 prefectures. The major cities, Osaka and Tokyo, remain under emergency orders, but the government is planning on ending those orders by May 21.
    • A large-scale study on the use of plasma from infected patients to others was found to be safe, passing Phase 1 of the process. The next step is to see if the process reduces symptoms in those infected.
    • The CDC has released guidelines for reopening.
  • The bad news:
    • Health care workers in Russia are dying at an alarming rate from COVID-19. PPE is generally lacking in Russia and the health care system suffers from underinvestment.
    • We have been worried that the race for a vaccine would become so politicized that it would hamper research and production. The head of Sanofi (SNY, $47.67), a French company, caused a stir when he indicated he would give preference to the U.S. for vaccine supplies because America has provided more money for research and development.  Needless to say, the Europeans were not pleased.  However, this comment raises the problem of free riding; why shouldn’t the U.S. get preferential treatment?  At the same time, there is a moral argument that suggests there should be equal access.  However, in reality, what would that mean?  Equal by what standard?  This row suggests that even when a vaccine is ready, factors for distribution will be difficult to create without triggering a political backlash.

The policy news:

  • The House will vote today on a $3.0 trillion fiscal package. Although the Democrat-sponsored bill should pass, it is meeting some resistance within the party.  The bill appears to have lots of unrelated spending and the GOP-controlled Senate has already declared it won’t pass in its current form.
    • The package includes aid for states. This is a problem for the GOP as there are some states that have created a problem for themselves by creating pension programs they can’t fund.  Thus, the GOP does not want to reward such behavior.  At the same time, in the last recovery, falling state fiscal spending more than offset federal stimulus.  States usually do their budgeting now for a June deadline.  It is almost certain that without some form of aid, state-level spending will decline precipitously due to the lack of revenue.  Because states don’t print the money they borrow in, they must balance their budgets.  If lawmakers are not careful, we could have a situation where fiscal spending is much less than advertised because states are cutting back as the federal government spends.
  • The Fed published a report on consumer finances; no surprise, lower income households have been severely hurt by the pandemic. Nearly 40% of workers earning <$40k per year have lost their jobs.
  • Seventy-five percent of small businesses have applied for government aid. So far, just under 40% have received help.  It is likely the number of those receiving aid will rise in the coming weeks, but the fear is that some may not survive long enough to get support.
  • Chair Powell and other members of the FOMC have made it abundantly clear they will not take policy rates below zero. And yet, futures markets continue to signal that such an outcome is possible.  Why is that?  One factor driving this outcome is a peculiarity of interest rate swaps.  Let’s say I have a fixed rate loan and I think rates are going to fall.  I could go to my bank and repaper the loan to a floating rate.  Or, we could do a swap.  Instead of paying my fixed rate, the bank and I make a deal where I pay the difference on some short-term interest rate compared to the current rate.  So, if rates, fall, I pay less.  However, once rates fall below zero, as the borrower, I would be required to pay the bank.  Borrowers don’t want that risk, so banks offer a downside cap that keeps the rate at zero.  To make that cap, banks go to the futures market and short the instrument so it would pay them if the rate goes negative. Thus, the rate signaling may be less about expectations and more about the mechanics of swaps.

The economic news:

The foreign news:

  • As usual, there was lots of China news:
    • Relations between the U.S. and China remain tense. In an interview yesterday, President Trump suggested that “we could cut off the whole relationship.”  The president proposed that Chinese firms may be required to meet U.S. accounting standards to acquire a U.S. exchange listing, although he did acknowledge this could simply mean Chinese firms may list elsewhere.  The president did seem to suggest that Phase 1 could be in trouble; China is stepping up farm purchases, indicating it doesn’t want to see this agreement fail.
    • Taiwan Semiconductor (TSM, 52.10) announced it will build a chip factory in Arizona. This is a significant act by the firm, which has always straddled the East and West.  By moving production to the U.S., it is signaling a greater reliance on the U.S.  This move will clearly get the attention of Beijing and may prompt greater chip self-sufficiency by China.
    • The Global Times, a tabloid in China, published an article suggesting that China should consider retaliatory measures in response to various COVID-19 lawsuits emanating from the U.S. One idea floated was to freeze U.S. assets in China.  Although this source is not considered an official mouthpiece for the Chinese leadership, it is a fount of nationalist trial balloons and may reflect a warning to Washington that Beijing is not without measures it can take.
    • The National People’s Congress (NPC) meeting starts today after a two-month delay due to the pandemic. We are watching to see:
      • What growth forecast, if any, China establishes. Even a 3% target for the year would require a robust recovery.  On the other hand, a number below that would look bad.  One of two outcomes is likely: either (a) they don’t offer a forecast, or (b) they make a 6% forecast for a two-year period.  In any case, China’s stimulus thus far has been modest and more will be needed if these sorts of numbers are going to be reached.  On the other hand, if there is no forecast, stimulus will likely remain modest.
      • We will be watching for any clues about an official response to cooling U.S. relations.
    • The U.S.S. McCampbell transited the Taiwan strait yesterday. This is a “freedom of navigation” maneuver that will clearly get the attention of Beijing.  It is also notable this occurred a week before the inauguration of Tsai Ing-wen to her second term.  China views the Taiwan leader as a separatist and thus the McCampbell sailing will be seen as a show of support for the incoming president.
    • As we noted yesterday, the head of the WTO has resigned a year before his term ended. It is apparently setting off a leadership struggle as both the U.S. and China vie to put “one of their own” in that role.
  • One of the measures of statehood is that a state holds a monopoly on violence. A country that can’t control security is one that doesn’t fully fulfill the role of a nation.  The active drug cartels in Mexico have raised this problem.  We note the cartels are using the pandemic to burnish their reputations by providing aid to the localities.

Brexit: Brexit talks are not going well.  The latest round of talks ends today.  The EU accuses the U.K. of refusing to compromise on key areas, including fisheries and the legal framework that will exist between the two sides.  The U.K. is accusing the EU of being “ideological.”  It seems unlikely the two sides will have a full deal by year’s end.  This means one of three outcomes: (a) we see an extension, although PM Johnson opposes this outcome, (b) a “mini-deal” that allows the two sides to claim that a deal was struck and then details on a broader deal will be worked out in the coming years, or (c) a hard break.  The most likely outcome is (b), although the odds of (c) are probably increasing.

View the complete PDF

Daily Comment (May 14, 2020)

by Bill O’Grady, Thomas Wash, and Patrick Fearon-Hernandez, CFA

[Posted: 9:30 AM EDT]

Good morning!  Equity markets continue under pressure this morning.  We update the COVID-19 news.  The Weekly Energy Update is available.  Here are the details:

COVID-19:  The number of reported cases is 4,364,172 with 297,491 deaths and 1,418,656 recoveries.  In the U.S., there are 1,390,764 confirmed cases with 84,136 deaths and 243,430 recoveries.  For those who like to keep score at home, the FT has created a nifty interactive chart that allows one to compare cases and fatalities between nations, scaled by population.  Here is another map from Axios, showing the growth of new cases by state.

The virus news:

  • The good news:
    • One of the tools being developed in the fight against the virus is blood antibodies. These drugs are developed either from the blood of humans who have recovered from COVID-19 or from animals who have been immunized.  This report from the FT is a primer on the process.
    • We have been reporting on new UV light processes to disinfect public areas. A robot equipped with a UV light has been able to disinfect hospital rooms.
    • Researchers at Yale say they have found that saliva is superior to nasal swabs to test for COVID-19 infection. If true, this would make the testing process much easier.
    • Border controls and social distancing measures are being relaxed.
    • The bad news:
      • Wuhan has launched a mass testing drive after a series of new infections from COVID-19 were reported.
      • South America is seeing a surge in cases without the resources to cope with the economic fallout from the virus.
      • Although children usually have mild cases of COVID-19, there are reports from New York of 100 cases of an inflammatory syndrome that comes from the virus. It is unclear if this development represents yet another mutation of the virus.
      • The medical establishment is working feverishly to create a vaccine for COVID-19. However, there is the possibility that a vaccine may not be accepted by part of the public.  This would slow herd immunity if this outcome develops.   Meanwhile, data from Spain suggests only about 5% of the population has been infected with COVID-19 and thus herd immunity is much further off (70% is considered a minimum for herd immunity).
      • The WHO’s chief scientist, Soumya Swaminathan, told a group yesterday that it may take four to five years to get COVID-19 under control, depending on medical developments and virus mutations.
        • Although one would wish for something different, it is also likely that the virus will simply need to be accommodated. Broad lockdowns do blunt the initial rise of the disease but are not a permanent solution.  After all, economic disruption and social isolation carry their own dangers.  What Swaminathan is really getting at is that society will need to learn to cope with the virus, similar to how we accommodate influenza and other infectious diseases.
        • This may mean that vulnerable populations will take greater precautions than others.
        • One of the more disturbing, but not surprising, elements of the current situation is that COVID-19 has become politized. This leads to binary thinking—either you open the economy full bore and risk rising infections or stay locked down for good and have no growth.  But, in reality, this isn’t the only set of choices.  We can build safety into our economy without complete social distancing and have vulnerable populations take additional measures without having those who are less at risk carry the same burden.  Will things be different?    Airplanes may need to build different seating arrangements.  Some things may cost more.  A generation may learn to cook at home.  Hotels are figuring out how to sanitize so patrons will return.  But, people and societies are remarkably adaptable.  This will get figured out.

The policy news:

The economic news:

The market news:

The foreign news:

WTO:  The head of the WTO has resigned a year before his term ended.  The WTO leadership has been under great strain due to rising trade tensions, and Roberto Azevedo has apparently decided to move on.

Islamic State:  Islamic State is becoming active again in the area on the Iraq/Syrian frontier.  This region is generally not controlled by either Damascus or Baghdad, and with the U.S. reducing its troop strength it appears the group is coming alive again.  One sign of activity is that Islamic State is being blamed for a series of crop fires in Iraq.

U.K.:  In anticipation of trade talks with the U.S., Westminster is planning to cut agricultural goods tariffs on U.S. farm exports.  As one would expect, there is opposition from British farmers to the news.

German courts:  Although Chancellor Merkel was (as expected) non-committal, the judges of Germany’s Constitutional Court are holding firm on their position in the fight over ECB QE.  If Germany continues on this path, the Eurozone will either (a) acquiesce to German hegemony over the Eurozone, or (b) likely accelerate the breakup of the single currency.  This is a very difficult dilemma.

View the complete PDF