Daily Comment (June 19, 2020)

by Bill O’Grady, Thomas Wash, and Patrick Fearon-Hernandez, CFA

[Posted: 9:30 AM EDT]

Good morning and happy Friday! U.S. equity futures are higher this morning as optimism over the economy continues to rise.  China remains in the news.  The forbearance being offered by lenders is having an adverse impact on the industry designed to deal with bad debt—bankruptcy lawyers and trustees, repossession firms, auction houses, etc.  Our usual commentary on COVID-19 is available.  Additionally, there are a couple of interesting market items.  Here are the details:

China news: 

  • SoS Pompeo met with Yang Jiechi yesterday in Hawaii. Both sides have been mostly tight-lipped about the outcome; it appears that the U.S. and China stated their positions on various issues but if there was any attempt to find commonality, it isn’t obvious.  Meanwhile, President Trump indicated the U.S. could still sever relations with China.
  • Large changes create opportunities. As conditions change in Hong Kong, other nations are looking to provide a home for various businesses currently in the former colony.  Japan is attempting to bring financial firms to Tokyo, for example.  At the same time, as the U.S. considers making Chinese firms delist from U.S. stock exchanges, Hong Kong bankers are trying to get these firms to list in Hong Kong.  Although only time will tell, it is possible that China will attempt to preserve Hong Kong’s financial power; as the U.S. leans toward closing off American financial markets from China, the Xi regime may need Hong Kong’s financial expertise.  That doesn’t mean that the CPC won’t try to end democracy in Hong Kong, but it may give the financial industry wide latitude to operate.
  • We continue to closely monitor the situation on the Indian/Chinese frontier. The leadership of both nations appear to be trying to contain nationalist fervor that could force escalation.  China, due to its social controls, can generally manage such issues.  India, on the other hand, has an active tabloid press and thus PM Modi will have his hands full trying to keep group emotions in check.
  • One outcome from the border clash is that New Delhi may decide to join the West in dealing with China. India has traditionally avoided such arrangements.  It was a key member of the non-aligned movement during the Cold War and tried to avoid joining either the Communist Bloc or the Free World.  If the border issue leads to India joining the West, it will add to the encirclement of China and would be seen as a major loss for Beijing.

Policy news:

  • One of the strengths of the U.S. system of capitalism is the ability to deal with failure. In Europe, going bankrupt could put a person in debtor’s prison; in the U.S., debts are written down and the debtor could start over.  The U.S. system isn’t perfect, but it works remarkably well compared to other nations.  An infrastructure has developed around bankruptcy and bad debt; there are law firms that specialize in bankruptcies.  Towing firms engage in repossession; banks have workout groups.  Auction houses specialize in selling off the assets that are repossessed.  Firms clean up houses after evictions to prepare for sale or lease.  All this activity forces creditors to quickly adjust the value of their loan assets and allows debtors to start over.  Additionally, the repossessed asset then gets put back into the economy, usually at an attractive price, to find a new use.
    • That process is mostly on hold. Despite rising bankruptcies on the horizon, at present, a set of policy decisions has effectively frozen the process.  In many states, evictions have been postponed.  Banks have been encouraged to offer debt service forbearance.  If the current downturn is mostly a short-term phenomenon and all will return to normal soon, these actions make sense.  However, if the recovery turns out to be long (as we expect), these policies will tend to keep debt backed by assets that have fallen in value in limbo.
    • If policy prevents the process of foreclosure, as we see in China and Japan, it can lead to slower growth. At the same time, the bankruptcy process, much like insurance, isn’t designed for systemic events.  In other words, the process works if bankruptcy is caused by poor management or bad luck for an individual; it doesn’t work as well if the bankruptcies are due to an event that causes widespread failure.  That’s what we saw in the Great Depression; the policy of the Hoover administration was to liquidate the loans aggressively, but that led to a debt/deflation spiral that collapsed the economy.
    • Policymakers seem to be leaning toward this event as systemic, so it has encouraged lenders to avoid immediate repossession and the Fed has been buying up corporate debt. The problem is that some of these loans are simply not going to get serviced and should be liquidated.  Unfortunately, it is hard to discern who is facing a solvency issue and who is facing a liquidity issue.  What we are doing works if it’s mostly the latter; it will create a Japan-like situation if it’s the former.
  • There is a growing call for a better way to fund small business. Although the SBA exists, its lending doesn’t appear to be filling the need.  So, there is some speculation that the Fed’s current program may become permanent.
    • Our two cents? A better way would be to reduce consolidation in the financial system and support the expansion of small banks.  Smaller banks seemed to do a better job of managing the PPP program; large banks do a good job with (a) massive loans to large borrowers, and (b) lending that is rules-based, like mortgages.  However, larger banks can only make money on operations that they can scale up and making individual lending decisions by human loan officers isn’t in their “sweet spot.”  That is a business that smaller banks can do more effectively.
  • European nations are on their way to implementing digital taxes. This will exacerbate trade tensions.

COVID-19:  The number of reported cases is 8,513,725 with 454,513 deaths and 4,181,443 recoveries.   In the U.S., there are 2,191,200 confirmed cases with 118,435 deaths and 599,115 recoveries.  For those who like to keep score at home, the FT has created a nifty interactive chart that allows one to compare cases across nations using similar scaling metrics.

Virology:

Markets:

View the complete PDF

Daily Comment (June 18, 2020)

by Bill O’Grady, Thomas Wash, and Patrick Fearon-Hernandez, CFA

[Posted: 9:30 AM EDT]

Good morning!  U.S. equity futures are weaker this morning, but off the worst levels of the overnight session.  Our usual commentary on COVID-19 is available.  We cover a myriad of policy issues this morning, including global taxes and the increased scrutiny facing U.S. tech firms.  In policy, a number of central banks took action overnight.  Australia looks like it is in recession and we examine the difference between expectations and reality in the economic reports.  The Weekly Energy Update is available.  Here are the details:

COVID-19The number of reported cases is 8,367,894 with 449,397 deaths and 4,091,978 recoveries.  In the U.S., there are 2,163,894 confirmed cases with 117,717 deaths and 592,191 recoveries.  For those who like to keep score at home, the FT has created a nifty interactive chart that allows one to compare cases across nations using similar scaling metrics.  Additionally, we have the weekly Axios U.S. state map.

Virology:

Policy news:

  • One of the issues that has developed in public finance is taxing multinational corporations. In the U.S., we often see tax breaks offered to companies to move facilities into a state.  It can become a race to the bottom as states are continually faced with the need to offer deals to keep companies within the state.  Because public goods must usually be provided to the company and workers (workers need police and fire protection, schools and company facilities need the same, plus infrastructure) the incidence of funding these services tends to fall on those who lack the resources to “shop around.”  Something similar occurs at the international level.  Nations can attract businesses by becoming tax havens.  Ireland is perhaps the most developed nation example.  Multinational firms have the resources to establish outlets in tax favorable environments and extract subsidies and other support.  In an effort to stop this process, the OECD had sponsored talks to harmonize global tax policy.  However, in any tax regime, there are those who benefit from the current situation and see little reason to change, and those who want to shift the incidence of a tax to others.  Europe has been keen on taxing technology, which, in reality, becomes a tax on U.S. firms.  The EU would gain the revenue and the U.S. would mostly bear the incidence of the tax payment.  Needless to say, the U.S. isn’t all that supportive of this effort.  As a result, yesterday, talks broke down.  We would expect the EU to go ahead with digital taxes and the U.S. to treat this move as targeting the U.S. and respond with tariffs and other penalties.
  • The tech industry is coming under increased scrutiny as part of the Communications Decency Act. Initially, in the 1990s, the government was concerned if young tech firms were sued for user content, they would be unable to survive and so the industry was given broad protections against lawsuits from user content.  So, the Communications Decency Act protected the firms from lawsuits.  However, as the firms have grown in size and power, policymakers are taking another look at this issue.  For example, Hawley (R-MO) is introducing legislation that would reduce the protections tied to censorship.  The DOJ is looking at similar measures to reduce immunity.
  • Apple (APPL, 353.94) is facing antitrust investigations from the EU over its app store.
  • Chair Powell finished this second day of Congressional testimony yesterday. What we noted was that the Chair does not want Congress to begin withdrawing fiscal support quite yet.  He wants some form of jobless benefits to continue, and the extension of other measures as well.
  • One of the factors we have been monitoring since 2008 has been the rise of populism which includes opposition to globalization. Within the political parties, this pits the establishment against the populists.  This issue has come up again recently, as the Chamber of Commerce warns against restricting visas for foreign workers, indicating that if businesses can’t get these workers from abroad, they will be forced to bid up wages for local workers…which is exactly the point the populists have been making.
  • USTR Lighthizer weighed in on the WTO yesterday. The body is searching for a new leader and the U.S. clearly wants to shape global trade policy in a more favorable manner.  What we find interesting is that Lighthizer doesn’t want to see the WTO scuttled (as some in Congress do), but does want it to fit trade policy to favor the U.S.
  • Several central banks eased credit yesterday, with the notable exception of Taiwan, who kept policy steady. This morning, the BOE expanded QE but didn’t move rates below zero.  The PBOC, who so far has been reluctant to expand policy stimulus, appears to be moving to boost growth.

China:

Markets:  Insurance companies are reviewing their exposure in collateralized loan obligations (CLOs).  CLOs are usually pooled corporate debt, originated by banks.  CLOs can be separated into different tranches by credit risk and payment priority.  In recent years, insurance companies have been avid buyers of these instruments to take advantage of their higher yield.  However, recently, there has been growing concerns about the credit quality of these instruments.

There is a rising level of delayed loan payments.  Student loans are showing the highest delinquencies.

Economy news:

The country, which hasn’t had a recession since the early 1990s, is clearly in one now.

  • One of the concepts a new analyst always has to learn is that the actual data matters less than the data relative to expectations. Recent data has been far better than forecast.
(Source:  Bloomberg)

This chart shows the economic surprise index from Bloomberg. It measures the difference between the actual data and expectations; the data included are weighted based on their effects on foreign exchange behavior.  What the index is telling us now is the economic data is coming in much better than forecast.  That doesn’t mean the data is good; it means that expectations are so depressed that even soft numbers are still better that deeply depressed forecasts.  What we have observed over the years is that the expectations tend to catch up in a few months and so better future data may not look as good, even with the improvement, because expectations will tend to rise even faster.  This could lead to “disappointing” economic data by autumn.

  • One of the consequences of the lockdowns has been that firms and workers are realizing that they probably don’t need to go to the office to be effective. And, if that’s the case, why would someone stay in a crowded expensive city if they can just as easily live elsewhere.  If this becomes a trend, smaller metropolitan areas may benefit from workers moving to new, smaller cities.
  • The massive expansion of central bank balance sheets has raised fears of inflation. Japan, which has seen ballooning government deficits, remains susceptible to deflation.

View the complete PDF

Weekly Energy Update (June 18, 2020)

by Bill O’Grady, Thomas Wash, and Patrick Fearon-Hernandez, CFA

Here is an updated crude oil price chart.  The oil market has stabilized at higher levels after April’s historic collapse.

(Source: Barchart.com)

Crude oil inventories were mostly in line with market expectations, with stockpiles rising 1.2 mb compared to forecasts of a 0.8 mb draw.  The SPR added 1.7 mb this week.

In the details, U.S. crude oil production fell 0.6 mbpd to 10.5 mbpd.  Exports were unchanged, while imports fell 0.2 mbpd.  Refining activity rose 0.7%, in line with expectations.  As we have seen in recent weeks, the level of unaccounted-for crude oil remains elevated but did decline this week.

Unaccounted-for crude oil is a balancing item in the weekly energy balance sheet.  To make the data balance, this line item is a plug figure, but that doesn’t mean it doesn’t matter.  This week’s number is -0.7 mbpd.  The fact that the decline fell from 1.0 mbpd to 0.7 mbpd and coincided with a sharp drop in oil production suggests that this number is reflecting falling output.  Simply put, oil production is falling faster than the official data suggest.

(Sources: DOE, CIM)

The above chart shows the annual seasonal pattern for crude oil inventories.  This week’s data showed a modest rise in crude oil stockpiles.  We are on the cusp of the beginning of the seasonal draw for crude oil.  If inventories don’t decline in the coming weeks, oil prices would be vulnerable to a correction.

Based on our oil inventory/price model, fair value is $27.27; using the euro/price model, fair value is $52.74.  The combined model, a broader analysis of the oil price, generates a fair value of $40.24.  We are starting to see a wide divergence between the EUR and oil inventory models.  The weakness we are seeing in the dollar, which we believe may have “legs,” is bullish for crude oil and may overcome the bearish oil inventory overhang.

Although conditions in energy are improving, the recovery is slow.  Refining operations are 20 points below average.

(Sources: DOE, CIM)

The IEA forecast a sharp recovery in oil demand in 2021, which we would expect.  This year’s crude demand is expected to fall 8.1 mbpd but rise 5.7 mbpd next year.

View the PDF

Daily Comment (June 17, 2020)

by Bill O’Grady, Thomas Wash, and Patrick Fearon-Hernandez, CFA

[Posted: 9:30 AM EDT]

Risk assets have wind in their sails today, in large part due to easing coronavirus lockdowns, signs of rapid economic recovery and continued policy support around the globe.  However, those positives are being offset to some extent by serious new geopolitical tensions between China and India, as well as a worrisome new outbreak in Beijing.  We review all the key news below.

China-India:  It now appears that yesterday’s China-India military clash along the countries’ border in the Himalayan mountains was substantially more lethal than first known.  The Indian government now says 20 of its soldiers died, including not just the three direct fatalities that we reported yesterday, but also 17 more who perished after falling into a deep ravine, or succumbing to the freezing temperatures.  To minimize the risk of a shooting war along the disputed border like the major 1962 confrontation, Chinese and Indian troops patrolling the area don’t carry firearms.  The current tensions have evolved from fistfights last month to attacks with rocks and clubs wrapped in barbed wire this week, resulting in the border troops’ first fatalities in decades.

  • Ultimately, the confrontation can be traced back to the heightened nationalist disposition of Chinese President Xi Jinping and Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi.  Both leaders want to assert their country’s sovereignty to the fullest extent possible, including in disputed areas like the Himalayan border.
    • Xi’s efforts to assert control in Hong Kong, Taiwan and the South China Sea are well known.
    • Modi has also been working to assert India’s control over the Kashmir region.  India’s warming ties with the U.S. and an ill-timed decision to postpone a major military exercise in the area probably also tempted Xi to take a tougher stance.
  • According to Indian sources, several Chinese troops also died in the melee, so a key risk now is that if the Chinese losses were substantial, Xi may find it hard to back down.  On the Indian side, Prime Minister Modi warned today that his country would provide a “befitting reply” if China tried to worsen the situation.
  • As a result of the initial fistfights last month, high-level Chinese and Indian military officers have been meeting to diffuse the situation, and they reportedly met again as recently as yesterday.  Calming tensions and averting a downward spiral in the conflict may require Xi and Modi to swallow some pride and pull back from the precipice.  If they don’t, any shooting conflict in the area would be a major risk to local and global financial markets.

COVID-19:  Official data show confirmed cases have risen to 8,199,838 worldwide, with 444,368 deaths and 3,978,358 recoveries.  In the United States, confirmed cases rose to 2,137,731, with 116,963 deaths and 583,503 recoveries.  Here is the interactive chart from the Financial Times that allows you to compare cases and deaths among countries, scaled by population.

Virology

Economic Impact

United States:  Congress will scrutinize the Trump administration’s aggressive international trade initiatives today, as U.S. Trade Representative Lighthizer, appears before House and Senate committees.  Lighthizer’s testimony will give lawmakers an opportunity to question how the administration’s recent trade deals are playing out.  We also expect them to probe how the administration sees the U.S. economic relationship with other trading partners, including the European Union and the United Kingdom.

United States-United Kingdom:  Even as the U.K. and the EU struggle to develop a post-Brexit trade agreement, with EU demands for a “level playing field” with lower-regulated Britain, it turns out that many British farmers are worried that the U.K.-U.S. trade deal now being negotiated will leave them unable to compete with even lower-regulated U.S. producers.  The result?  They’re also hoping for a “level playing field” with the U.S.

Hungary:  Parliament voted to end a controversial state of emergency that gave Prime Minister Viktor Orban the right to rule by decree, after leaders in the U.S. Congress and the European Union accused him of using the coronavirus pandemic to amass authoritarian-like powers.  However, the legislators left in place some of the measures the government took during the height of its outbreak to concentrate fiscal control over the country’s largely liberal cities.

View the complete PDF

Daily Comment (June 16, 2020)

by Bill O’Grady, Thomas Wash, and Patrick Fearon-Hernandez, CFA

[Posted: 9:30 AM EDT]

Risk assets are on a tear so far today in response to a blockbuster report on U.S. retail sales suggesting that the economy may be rebounding from the coronavirus crisis more rapidly than expected.  At the same time, officials across the globe continue to signal more monetary and fiscal stimulus, though geopolitical risks are also rising on the China-India border.  As always, we review all the key news below.

United States:  Federal Reserve Chairman Powell will testify before Congress this morning.  While the Fed’s recent forecasts calling for a long post-coronavirus recovery have buttressed expectations that monetary policy will remain extremely accommodative, we’ll be watching closely for any sign that today’s better-than-expected retail sales data may have shifted his views or policy preferences.

COVID-19:  Official data show confirmed cases have risen to 8,058,427 worldwide, with 437,473 deaths and 3,893,780 recoveries.  In the United States, confirmed cases rose to 2,114,026, with 116,127 deaths and 576,334 recoveries.  Here is the interactive chart from the Financial Times that allows you to compare cases and deaths among countries, scaled by population.

Virology

Real Economy

U.S. Policy Response

Foreign Policy Response

  • In a move that would align the ECB’s monetary policies more closely with the Fed’s policies, ECB Executive Director Fabio Panetta offered assurances that his central bank would consider buying “fallen angel” bonds that have recently lost their investment grade rating if necessary to combat the financial fallout from the coronavirus crisis.  Even though the ECB increased the size of its bond-buying program to €1.35 trillion earlier this month, Panetta said it still hasn’t unleashed the “full monty” of its available stimulus.

European Union-United Kingdom:  In their video summit yesterday, top leaders from the U.K. and the EU agreed to redouble their efforts to strike a post-Brexit trade deal in the coming weeks.  The surprisingly cordial post-summit statements from the likes of British Prime Minister Johnson and European Council President Michel are reassuring, but we note that there is still some risk that the two sides won’t come to an agreement and Britain could be facing a sudden stop in its trade with the EU at the end of the year.  Naturally, such a hard break would be negative for European, and particularly British, stocks.

United States-European Union:  Following a preliminary investigation, the European Commission said it has opened two formal antitrust investigations into Apple (AAPL, 342.99).  The investigations will look into the company’s practice of charging media firms’ large commissions to sell their products through its App Store and Apple Pay payment system, even as it uses the information gleaned to promote its own music and book services.  The launch of yet another regulatory move against a major U.S. technology firm is likely to further sour U.S.-EU relations.  The move is also likely to sit badly with Washington because, at the same time, the EU is loosening its state-aid rules to make it easier for member governments to help their own tech start-ups.

United States-China:  As more evidence of cooling U.S.-China tensions, the Department of Commerce yesterday slightly loosened its sanctions against Chinese telecom equipment giant Huawei (002502.SZ, 2.87).  The move will allow U.S. firms to collaborate with Huawei on setting technical standards for 5G and other emerging technologies.  Separately, U.S. Secretary of State Pompeo and Chinese Foreign Minister Yang Jiechi will meet tomorrow in Hawaii.

China-India:  In a dangerous escalation of tensions, the Indian military said three of its soldiers have been killed in clashes with Chinese troops along the countries’ disputed border high in the Himalayan mountains.  The deaths, which were the first since the 1970s in the two countries’ long-running border dispute, came despite multiple rounds of talks by Indian and Chinese military commanders intended to de-escalate tensions.  Those talks had pointed to some easing in the latest round of tensions, but the surprising deaths are a sign that things aren’t going as well as previously thought.  Therefore, the news has weighed on Indian stocks so far today.

North Korea:  In a dramatic display of its frustration with the stalled denuclearization talks and continued sanctions, North Korea has blown up the inter-Korean liaison office near the country’s border with South Korea.  The explosion came just hours after North Korea said via state media that its military would potentially enter border areas that had been disarmed after a 2018 summit between Kim Jong Un and South Korean President Moon Jae-in.

View the complete PDF

Weekly Geopolitical Report – The Geopolitics of the 2020 Election: Part IV (June 15, 2020)

by Bill O’Grady | PDF

In this five-part series on the geopolitics of the 2020 election, we have divided the reports into nine sections. Last week, in Part III, we covered the incidence of establishment policy and the role of social media.  This week, we reveal the sixth and seventh sections; we handicap the race as it stands and discuss how foreign nations are likely to intervene in the election.

Who is Going to Win?
Before we discuss our expectations of the outcome, we want to note that we analyze elections with an eye toward answering two questions.  First, who is going to win? Second, what will they do once elected?  In our primary role of managing money, we cannot afford to allow any political preference to distort our process as that bias could affect investment performance.  And, being well ensconced in the flyover zone of the U.S., our political biases don’t matter anyway.  It’s not as if our analysis affects the actual outcomes of elections.  Our position is that, as a money manager, we want to know what the future looks like, not necessarily root for a certain outcome.  So, here goes.

To forecast the outcome of elections, we have various factors we examine that have signaled the outcomes of previous elections.  These factors are:

  1. Incumbency
  2. The Economy
  3. Polling
  4. Prediction Markets
  5. Base of Support
  6. Money
  7. Social Media Presence

We are also sensitive to the fact that we don’t directly elect presidents; we elect electors to the Electoral College who, in most states, vote for the president based on the majority of votes in that state.[1]  So, our focus is on determining our best estimate of the Electoral College based on polls and available decision markets, along with  economic activity at the state level.

Read the full report


[1] Maine and Nebraska can have split electoral votes.

Daily Comment (June 15, 2020)

by Bill O’Grady, Thomas Wash, and Patrick Fearon-Hernandez, CFA

[Posted: 9:30 AM EDT]

Good morning and happy Monday!  It’s another risk-off day as financial markets recoil from reports of rising COVID-19 infections.  Our usual commentary on COVID-19 is available.  We update on China and trade issues with the U.K./EU/U.S.  We are watching U.S./Russian relations as Paul Whelan was found guilty of espionage.  We look at the economy and policy news.  Here is what we are watching:

COVID-19:   The number of reported cases is 7,934,277 with 433,919 deaths and 3,789,462 recoveries.   In the U.S., there are 2,094,069 confirmed cases with 115,732 deaths and 561,816 recoveries.  For those who like to keep score at home, the FT has created a nifty interactive chart that allows one to compare cases across nations using similar scaling metrics.

Virology:

China:  Although the virus surge in Beijing is catching most of the attention this morning, overall economic conditions do show improvement.  Consumers continue to show caution, but are spending on big-ticket items.  Also, as usual, China is using investment spending to lift growth.

(Source:  Capital Economics)

This chart shows a steady rebound in the Chinese economy.

SoS Pompeo is meeting with EU foreign ministers to craft a common policy on China.  He is getting some pushback from the EU, which wants to tie cooperation on China with an easing of the trade conflict with Washington.  Of course, Pompeo will try and insist that the issues are separate, but we doubt he will be able to make his case.

Trade:  PM Johnson and EC President von der Leyen will hold video talks today to discuss Brexit.  Johnson is hoping his personal touch will push talks forward while von der Leyen intends to reiterate the EU position on either integration, or a hard border.  At the same time, trade talks between the U.K. and the U.S. will resume today.  There is speculation that Westminster is using talks with the U.S. to extract concessions from the EU; however, Washington could just as easily insist on difficult concessions from the U.K., given its precarious position with the EU.

Russia:  Paul Whelan was found guilty of espionage and sentenced to 16 years in prison.   Although Russia accuses Whelan of spying, his background suggests he probably isn’t one.  He is a corporate security official for a car parts manufacturing firm and was in Russia for a wedding.  He is a Marine, but was discharged under less than stellar circumstances.  We suspect Russia seized Whelan and intends to use him for swap purposes in the future.  We will monitor this case to see if his cause is taken up by the government.

Economy news:  There is growing evidence that the U.S. economy is improving; given how deep the initial decline was, it is almost impossible for things to not look better.  However, it is still good to see signs of life.  Nevertheless, coping with COVID-19 remains a challenge.  We note that manufacturing firms are slow to recover, due to the costs of protective measures and continued infections.

Policy news:  This week, Chair Powell will travel to Capitol Hill to give his semi-annual testimony to Congress.  Given the forecasts from the Fed, we expect him to give testimony that the economy needs additional help.  National Economic Council head Kudlow opposes extending the $600 per week boost to unemployment insurance, but does support a smaller bonus for workers returning to their jobs.  There is worry that the unemployment insurance benefit may be an impediment to returning to work.  At the same time, Peter Navarro says the president wants another stimulus program of at least $2.0 trillion.

View the complete PDF

Asset Allocation Weekly (June 12, 2020)

by Asset Allocation Committee

Although gold is the primary precious metal for investors, platinum, palladium and silver also can fulfill that role.  Complicating matters is that these three metals are dual-use products.  Unlike gold, which has few uses outside of monetary (store of value) purposes and jewelry, these other three have industrial uses as well.  About 55% of silver consumption is in electronics, while 39% is used for jewelry, silverware and monetary reasons.  The remaining 6% of silver consumption is in associated industrial use, including solar panels.  Industry and automotive demand accounts for about 60% of platinum demand, with jewelry absorbing about 30% and investment demand the remainder.  Palladium, which has been in the news lately due to strong price behavior, is mostly used in automobile exhaust systems; nearly 84% of the metal goes into cars, with other industrial uses taking up nearly all the remaining demand.

Thus, unlike gold, the other three precious metals are much more sensitive to industrial activity.  Supply factors are different as well.  Silver is mostly a byproduct of base metal and precious metal mining; only about 28% of silver comes from primary silver mines.  The rest comes from the mining activities of lead, zinc, copper and gold.  Thus, the supply of new silver is affected by the demand for these other metals.  In contrast, platinum and palladium both have limited sources; nearly 75% of new supply of platinum comes from South Africa, whereas 40% of the world’s palladium comes from Russia.

Both gold and silver prices began to rally in the early part of the 2000s after being in the doldrums from the mid-1980s through the 1990s.  High real interest rates depressed demand as policy was designed to contain inflation.  But, around 2003, gold began to rally, and by 2005, silver did as well.  This rally continued into 2011 when silver prices began to fall, and gold followed in 2012.  A stronger dollar weighed on precious metals prices during this period.

Since 2017, gold prices have clearly outpaced silver, but since August 2018, gold’s outperformance has been substantial.

The gold/silver ratio has been a longstanding way of measuring the relative value of the two metals.

During the gold standard years, many nations conducted a bimetallic system, where gold and silver could be used for money.  The common exchange was 15:1.  The relative scarcity of gold relative to silver led to a widening ratio after the Civil War into WWI.  During WWI, silver prices rose due to expanding industrial activity for the war effort.  The change in the official price of gold by the Roosevelt administration led the ratio to widen out during the 1930s into WWII.  Steadily rising silver prices reduced the ratio to 20:1 by late 1960; in response, the Coinage Act of 1965 dramatically reduced the use of silver in U.S. coins, easing the demand for silver and causing the ratio to rise.

The end of Bretton Woods ended the last remnants of the gold standard, leading to much higher prices for both metals.  Since the mid-1970s, the gold/silver ratio has generally tracked the path of industrial production.  This relationship reflects the industrial demand for silver that doesn’t exist to the same extent for gold.

The upper line on the chart shows the monthly gold/silver ratio; the lower line shows detrended U.S. industrial production.  Although the relationship isn’t perfect, in general, stronger industrial production has tended to coincide with a lower ratio, whereas falling and below-trend industrial production benefits gold in the ratio.  The current ratio is near its all-time highs, reflecting (a) generally weak industrial production in the latest business cycle, and (b) the recent collapse in production due to the pandemic shutdowns.

Although there remains a great deal of uncertainty surrounding the path of the recovery, as we detailed recently, the most likely path of this business cycle will be a deep but short recession followed by a lengthy recovery.  If this assessment is correct, industrial activity should rebound in the coming months.  Given the historic level of the gold/silver ratio, coupled with our overall positive position on gold, we believe silver is also attractively valued at current prices if our expectations about the economy are correct.  Therefore, for risk-tolerant investors, silver may be an attractive allocation at this time.

View the PDF

Daily Comment (June 12, 2020)

by Bill O’Grady, Thomas Wash, and Patrick Fearon-Hernandez, CFA

[Posted: 9:30 AM EDT]

Good morning and happy Friday!  After a big drop yesterday, equities are recovering this morning.  Our take gets top billing in today’s report.  Next up is tech news, followed by foreign developments.  After those sections, we offer a couple of interesting charts. There is an intensification of talks around Brexit.  Our usual commentary on COVID-19 is available, along with some reports on vaccines and immunity; in addition, we are seeing a rise in new infections, with the emerging and frontier world showing the fastest increases.  Policy updates follow and we conclude with China.  Additionally, this week’s Asset Allocation Weekly (AAW) is available; it’s all about silver.  Let’s get to it:

Market news:  Yesterday was a clear risk-off session.  A couple of culprits have been blamed, but the reasons offered in the media always smack of post hoc.  The two most offered explanations for the drop was Chair Powell’s “gloomy” economic outlook and the surge in new COVID-19 cases.  Both conditions were essentially in place before the selloff.  As we noted in the May 29 AAW, this recession will likely be short, but very deep and with a long recovery.  The Fed’s forecast confirmed that expectation.  Why did this confirmation suddenly lead to a sharp selloff?  It probably didn’t.  Our take is that equities rallied very far and very fast from the March lows and some degree of consolidation was likely.  On the pandemic, there is no doubt that easing the lockdown will increase infections.  The bigger issue is the ability of the medical sector to handle the increase.  We expect it will, so national or even state lockdowns are not likely.  That doesn’t mean local ones won’t be necessary.

The key to the rise in equities, we believe, came from two sources; first, equities anticipate and participants realized the recession may be over as soon as next month.  Second, the policy response has been epic and there is no evidence it’s over.  Thus, barring something new (war with China, pandemic takes a much more deadly turn, etc.) we probably are not testing the recent cycle low.  However, it is important to note that the recoveries from recession lows often have long, sideways periods.  We would not be shocked to see a period of consolidation.

Tech news:  Twitter (TWTR, 33.03) has uncovered over 32k accounts linked to the governments of China, Russia and Turkey which the company accuses of spreading disinformation.  In addition, the company says another 174k accounts are fake and tied to China.  Social media has become a low-cost conduit for foreign actors to attempt to sow chaos, or sway U.S. public opinion; how the platforms deal with this issue is complicated and is a potential threat to their business models.  In other tech news, major name brands are getting a boost from the European Commission who is pressing tech companies to police the sale of counterfeit goods using the brand names.

Foreign news:  North Korea’s rhetoric has turned hostile in recent days.  In a statement on the second anniversary of the U.S./North Korean summit, Pyongyang now says that diplomacy has failed and the country will accelerate its nuclear program.  We continue to gather information on Kim’s sister, Kim Yo Jong, who has emerged as a power center in the government, and appears to be unusually hawkish, even by Kim standards.  There are reports that she was instrumental in the recent removal of communication lines between the North and South.  One interesting sideline; North Korea has been illegally selling sand, evading sanctions.  Europe is opening its borders this summer, but with restrictions.

Syrian President Assad has replaced his prime minister; Hussein Arnous is taking over for Imad Khamis.  Syria has seen its economy suffer in recent weeks, likely tied to the pandemic.  The Syrian pound fell to 3k per USD recently.  We suspect Khamis fell from grace due to the slumping economy.  The U.S. and Iraq are opening talks on the future of American troops in the country.  Immediately after the assassination of Soleimani in Iraq, there were calls for ousting U.S. troops.  However, a resurgence of IS and a new PM have led to second thoughts.  We still expect the U.S. to reduce its presence, not just in Iraq but across the Middle East. However the talks suggest that it may not be immediate.

Economic news:  The Fed released the Financial Accounts of the U.S. yesterday for Q1; it was previously known as the “flow of funds” report.  It is a wide set of data about the shape of the economy and the financial system and our first look at the impact of the pandemic.  The net worth of U.S. households fell due to the decline in equities

This chart shows net worth compared to after tax income.  The drop is noticeable.  Net worth is $110.8 trillion, down $6.5 trillion from Q4, which is a record.  However, scaling is important, which is why we offer the above graph.

The U.K. economy fell 20.4% in April, compared to March on a non-annualized basis.  This is a spectacular decline but is exacerbated by the short time frame.  Britain, along with Canada, are among the few nations that offer official monthly GDP reports.  In the U.S., Macroeconomic Advisors calculates monthly GDP for the U.S.

According to their data, the decline in April was -76.3% annualized, or about 11.3% from March, about half as large a decline as reported in the U.K.

One of the datapoints overlooked in the recent employment report was the decline in government employment, which fell 585k.  Virtually all of that decline was in state and local governments, with the latter accounting for 83.3% of the job losses.  Cities and counties are shedding workers are a rapid pace.

Brexit and trade:  The EU and the U.K. have announced a high-level conference with PM Johnson and Ursula von der Leyen on June 15.  Meanwhile, in deference to U.K. businesses, the Johnson government is planning on reducing border checks on the British side of the EU/U.K. trade even though the EU will likely deploy full checks in the absence of a trade deal.  However, this decision only covers the trade with the continent; the plans for the North Sea remain unsettled.

COVID-19:  The number of reported cases is 7,543,070 with 421,948 deaths and 3,561,804 recoveries.  In the U.S., there are 2,023,347 confirmed cases with 113,820 deaths and 540,292 recoveries.  For those who like to keep score at home, the FT has created a nifty interactive chart that allows one to compare cases across nations using similar scaling metrics.

Virology:

Policy news:  Although there have been signs the EU was making significant steps in creating a continental response to the pandemic, actual legislation remains a slog.  The White House is considering a second round of stimulus; Congress’s recess schedule is an additional complication.  There are worries that a round of evictions may hit the economy later this summer.  Investors are beginning to calculate the impact of yield curve control.

China:  China is undertaking a $1.0 trillion campaign into technology research.  It is evident the U.S. and China are engaged in a tech race.

View the complete PDF