Asset Allocation Weekly (June 12, 2020)

by Asset Allocation Committee

Although gold is the primary precious metal for investors, platinum, palladium and silver also can fulfill that role.  Complicating matters is that these three metals are dual-use products.  Unlike gold, which has few uses outside of monetary (store of value) purposes and jewelry, these other three have industrial uses as well.  About 55% of silver consumption is in electronics, while 39% is used for jewelry, silverware and monetary reasons.  The remaining 6% of silver consumption is in associated industrial use, including solar panels.  Industry and automotive demand accounts for about 60% of platinum demand, with jewelry absorbing about 30% and investment demand the remainder.  Palladium, which has been in the news lately due to strong price behavior, is mostly used in automobile exhaust systems; nearly 84% of the metal goes into cars, with other industrial uses taking up nearly all the remaining demand.

Thus, unlike gold, the other three precious metals are much more sensitive to industrial activity.  Supply factors are different as well.  Silver is mostly a byproduct of base metal and precious metal mining; only about 28% of silver comes from primary silver mines.  The rest comes from the mining activities of lead, zinc, copper and gold.  Thus, the supply of new silver is affected by the demand for these other metals.  In contrast, platinum and palladium both have limited sources; nearly 75% of new supply of platinum comes from South Africa, whereas 40% of the world’s palladium comes from Russia.

Both gold and silver prices began to rally in the early part of the 2000s after being in the doldrums from the mid-1980s through the 1990s.  High real interest rates depressed demand as policy was designed to contain inflation.  But, around 2003, gold began to rally, and by 2005, silver did as well.  This rally continued into 2011 when silver prices began to fall, and gold followed in 2012.  A stronger dollar weighed on precious metals prices during this period.

Since 2017, gold prices have clearly outpaced silver, but since August 2018, gold’s outperformance has been substantial.

The gold/silver ratio has been a longstanding way of measuring the relative value of the two metals.

During the gold standard years, many nations conducted a bimetallic system, where gold and silver could be used for money.  The common exchange was 15:1.  The relative scarcity of gold relative to silver led to a widening ratio after the Civil War into WWI.  During WWI, silver prices rose due to expanding industrial activity for the war effort.  The change in the official price of gold by the Roosevelt administration led the ratio to widen out during the 1930s into WWII.  Steadily rising silver prices reduced the ratio to 20:1 by late 1960; in response, the Coinage Act of 1965 dramatically reduced the use of silver in U.S. coins, easing the demand for silver and causing the ratio to rise.

The end of Bretton Woods ended the last remnants of the gold standard, leading to much higher prices for both metals.  Since the mid-1970s, the gold/silver ratio has generally tracked the path of industrial production.  This relationship reflects the industrial demand for silver that doesn’t exist to the same extent for gold.

The upper line on the chart shows the monthly gold/silver ratio; the lower line shows detrended U.S. industrial production.  Although the relationship isn’t perfect, in general, stronger industrial production has tended to coincide with a lower ratio, whereas falling and below-trend industrial production benefits gold in the ratio.  The current ratio is near its all-time highs, reflecting (a) generally weak industrial production in the latest business cycle, and (b) the recent collapse in production due to the pandemic shutdowns.

Although there remains a great deal of uncertainty surrounding the path of the recovery, as we detailed recently, the most likely path of this business cycle will be a deep but short recession followed by a lengthy recovery.  If this assessment is correct, industrial activity should rebound in the coming months.  Given the historic level of the gold/silver ratio, coupled with our overall positive position on gold, we believe silver is also attractively valued at current prices if our expectations about the economy are correct.  Therefore, for risk-tolerant investors, silver may be an attractive allocation at this time.

View the PDF

Daily Comment (June 12, 2020)

by Bill O’Grady, Thomas Wash, and Patrick Fearon-Hernandez, CFA

[Posted: 9:30 AM EDT]

Good morning and happy Friday!  After a big drop yesterday, equities are recovering this morning.  Our take gets top billing in today’s report.  Next up is tech news, followed by foreign developments.  After those sections, we offer a couple of interesting charts. There is an intensification of talks around Brexit.  Our usual commentary on COVID-19 is available, along with some reports on vaccines and immunity; in addition, we are seeing a rise in new infections, with the emerging and frontier world showing the fastest increases.  Policy updates follow and we conclude with China.  Additionally, this week’s Asset Allocation Weekly (AAW) is available; it’s all about silver.  Let’s get to it:

Market news:  Yesterday was a clear risk-off session.  A couple of culprits have been blamed, but the reasons offered in the media always smack of post hoc.  The two most offered explanations for the drop was Chair Powell’s “gloomy” economic outlook and the surge in new COVID-19 cases.  Both conditions were essentially in place before the selloff.  As we noted in the May 29 AAW, this recession will likely be short, but very deep and with a long recovery.  The Fed’s forecast confirmed that expectation.  Why did this confirmation suddenly lead to a sharp selloff?  It probably didn’t.  Our take is that equities rallied very far and very fast from the March lows and some degree of consolidation was likely.  On the pandemic, there is no doubt that easing the lockdown will increase infections.  The bigger issue is the ability of the medical sector to handle the increase.  We expect it will, so national or even state lockdowns are not likely.  That doesn’t mean local ones won’t be necessary.

The key to the rise in equities, we believe, came from two sources; first, equities anticipate and participants realized the recession may be over as soon as next month.  Second, the policy response has been epic and there is no evidence it’s over.  Thus, barring something new (war with China, pandemic takes a much more deadly turn, etc.) we probably are not testing the recent cycle low.  However, it is important to note that the recoveries from recession lows often have long, sideways periods.  We would not be shocked to see a period of consolidation.

Tech news:  Twitter (TWTR, 33.03) has uncovered over 32k accounts linked to the governments of China, Russia and Turkey which the company accuses of spreading disinformation.  In addition, the company says another 174k accounts are fake and tied to China.  Social media has become a low-cost conduit for foreign actors to attempt to sow chaos, or sway U.S. public opinion; how the platforms deal with this issue is complicated and is a potential threat to their business models.  In other tech news, major name brands are getting a boost from the European Commission who is pressing tech companies to police the sale of counterfeit goods using the brand names.

Foreign news:  North Korea’s rhetoric has turned hostile in recent days.  In a statement on the second anniversary of the U.S./North Korean summit, Pyongyang now says that diplomacy has failed and the country will accelerate its nuclear program.  We continue to gather information on Kim’s sister, Kim Yo Jong, who has emerged as a power center in the government, and appears to be unusually hawkish, even by Kim standards.  There are reports that she was instrumental in the recent removal of communication lines between the North and South.  One interesting sideline; North Korea has been illegally selling sand, evading sanctions.  Europe is opening its borders this summer, but with restrictions.

Syrian President Assad has replaced his prime minister; Hussein Arnous is taking over for Imad Khamis.  Syria has seen its economy suffer in recent weeks, likely tied to the pandemic.  The Syrian pound fell to 3k per USD recently.  We suspect Khamis fell from grace due to the slumping economy.  The U.S. and Iraq are opening talks on the future of American troops in the country.  Immediately after the assassination of Soleimani in Iraq, there were calls for ousting U.S. troops.  However, a resurgence of IS and a new PM have led to second thoughts.  We still expect the U.S. to reduce its presence, not just in Iraq but across the Middle East. However the talks suggest that it may not be immediate.

Economic news:  The Fed released the Financial Accounts of the U.S. yesterday for Q1; it was previously known as the “flow of funds” report.  It is a wide set of data about the shape of the economy and the financial system and our first look at the impact of the pandemic.  The net worth of U.S. households fell due to the decline in equities

This chart shows net worth compared to after tax income.  The drop is noticeable.  Net worth is $110.8 trillion, down $6.5 trillion from Q4, which is a record.  However, scaling is important, which is why we offer the above graph.

The U.K. economy fell 20.4% in April, compared to March on a non-annualized basis.  This is a spectacular decline but is exacerbated by the short time frame.  Britain, along with Canada, are among the few nations that offer official monthly GDP reports.  In the U.S., Macroeconomic Advisors calculates monthly GDP for the U.S.

According to their data, the decline in April was -76.3% annualized, or about 11.3% from March, about half as large a decline as reported in the U.K.

One of the datapoints overlooked in the recent employment report was the decline in government employment, which fell 585k.  Virtually all of that decline was in state and local governments, with the latter accounting for 83.3% of the job losses.  Cities and counties are shedding workers are a rapid pace.

Brexit and trade:  The EU and the U.K. have announced a high-level conference with PM Johnson and Ursula von der Leyen on June 15.  Meanwhile, in deference to U.K. businesses, the Johnson government is planning on reducing border checks on the British side of the EU/U.K. trade even though the EU will likely deploy full checks in the absence of a trade deal.  However, this decision only covers the trade with the continent; the plans for the North Sea remain unsettled.

COVID-19:  The number of reported cases is 7,543,070 with 421,948 deaths and 3,561,804 recoveries.  In the U.S., there are 2,023,347 confirmed cases with 113,820 deaths and 540,292 recoveries.  For those who like to keep score at home, the FT has created a nifty interactive chart that allows one to compare cases across nations using similar scaling metrics.

Virology:

Policy news:  Although there have been signs the EU was making significant steps in creating a continental response to the pandemic, actual legislation remains a slog.  The White House is considering a second round of stimulus; Congress’s recess schedule is an additional complication.  There are worries that a round of evictions may hit the economy later this summer.  Investors are beginning to calculate the impact of yield curve control.

China:  China is undertaking a $1.0 trillion campaign into technology research.  It is evident the U.S. and China are engaged in a tech race.

View the complete PDF

Daily Comment (June 11, 2020)

by Bill O’Grady, Thomas Wash, and Patrick Fearon-Hernandez, CFA

[Posted: 9:30 AM EDT]

Good morning.  It’s a risk-off day so far, with global equities falling.  Some of this appears to be some well-deserved profit taking in the wake of a strong equity rally.  The FOMC meeting ended yesterday.  We examine what they announced and other policy developments.  There may be a thaw in Brexit talks.  We update the latest on China.  Our usual commentary on COVID-19 is available along with some reports on vaccine development and a global rise in new infections.   Precious metals prices have been strong (they are higher this morning); we look at recent internal issues caused by a disruption of supply flows.  The Weekly Energy Update is available.  Here is the information:

Policy news:  The FOMC meeting ended.  There were no surprises in the statement.  The Fed kept rates unchanged and didn’t signal any adjustments to QE or other programs.  The tone of the statement was very cautious; the committee clearly wanted to convey a sense that the downturn is still a major risk to American citizens and that monetary policy will remain easy for the foreseeable future.   The statement was approved by all the voting members of the committee. Because this was a meeting on the quarter, the FOMC released economic projections.  It’s forecast for this year’s GDP is -6.5%, with a 5.0% reading in 2021 and 3.5% in 2022.

Their forecasts suggest that the recovery won’t end until sometime in 2021; the level of GDP will remain below the 2019 peak for the next two years.  Consequently, the forward guidance from the Fed is no change to the policy rate is expected until 2022, based on the median dot.  In other words, the Fed is now engaging in forward guidance, signaling that rates will stay low for at least the next 30 months.

There were three other items of note.  First, although there was no mention in the statement about yield curve control, Chair Powell noted the committee did talk about it in the meeting in response to a question in the press conference.  Second, there was no discussion about negative interest rates, although two St. Louis FRB economists suggested it might be necessary in order to boost the economy back to its long-term trend.  There is an argument to be made for negative rates.

These charts show the Mankiw rule variations.  Regular readers will recognize this rule as an offshoot of the Taylor Rule, which attempts to estimate the Fed funds target based on inflation and economic slack.  The difference is in the measure of slack. Taylor used the difference between GDP and potential GDP.  The latter number is not directly observable.  Mankiw substituted the unemployment rate.  We added three other measures of labor slack.  The chart on the right highlights the current situation; three of the four variations of the Mankiw rule are in negative territory, with the employment/population ratio model suggesting Fed funds should be 5.65%.  We don’t expect the Fed to deploy negative policy rates.  Negative rates would wreak havoc on the non-bank financial system and probably end money market funds as a financial instrument.  Third, Powell was asked about the problem of creating overvalued asset markets through easy monetary policy; Powell, in line with his predecessors, made it abundantly clear that he does not see how the Fed could raise rates and potentially hurt workers by trying to contain an asset bubble.  The ramifications are obvious; Fed policy will continue to support asset prices.

To put what the Fed has done in context, compare the S&P 500 to the policy response.  This chart looks at the yearly growth rate of M2 and the S&P.  We have taken the average growth rate of the money supply and one standard deviation bands over the period 1959—2020.  The black vertical lines show the month end peak of the S&P; the red lines show how long it took the Fed to lift money growth above the standard deviation line after a bear market ensued.  In 2000, it took 13 months; in 2007, 14 months and this time, four months.  Additionally, in the previous two episodes, once the standard deviation line was hit, money growth promptly fell.  Compare that behavior to the current cycle; not only is money growth running in excess of 20%, more than two standard deviations above the average, the time to reach that level has been very short.  Simply put, policy support is extreme and accounts for much of the rally in stocks.  There was nothing heard yesterday that makes us believe that policy stimulus will be removed anytime soon.  If anything, there could be more actions in the pipeline.

In terms of market reaction, equities initially rallied on the statement but retreated during the press conference.  We didn’t see anything particularly bearish, so the decline is probably profit taking.  Precious metals prices jumped.  The dollar initially fell but did recover after the press conference ended.  Interest rates also fell.  Our view is that (a) policy will remain easy but (b) the Fed remains reluctant to take more radical steps (yield curve control, deliberate dollar depreciation, negative interest rates) without additional deterioration in economic conditions.

In other policy news, Treasury Secretary Mnuchin indicated that he believed more fiscal action would be necessary to boost the economy, especially to small businesses.  The U.S. is proposing additional spending to bolster the semiconductor industry; this is partly to offset the costs of separating from China.  The U.S. is expanding its price fixing investigation of the poultry industry.

In overseas policy news, the ECB is apparently considering creating a “bad bank” that would absorb bad loans across the EU caused by COVID-19.  This approach allows for the loan to be worked out, and cleans up the balance sheet of the bank that held the bad debt.  Amazon (AMZN, 2647.45) will face anti-trust charges from the EU over its treatment of third party sellers.

Brexit and trade:  Michel Barnier, the EU chief negotiator for Brexit is asking for flexibility on the issue of a “level playing field.”  The EU has been worried that the U.K. would become a low regulation “Singapore on the Thames” that would undermine EU trade regulations.  Thus, the EU has held a rather hard line on not giving Westminster such arrangements.  The fact that Barnier is asking for some wiggle room suggests that the EU is starting to bend.  Why the change?  Probably because nations, like Ireland, which would be hurt badly by a hard Brexit, want to avoid that outcome.

China:  Here is what we are watching:

  • China has been allowing the CNY to weaken in response to increased U.S. pressure. As long as capital flight remains contained, we expect Beijing to continue to weaken its currency.
  • Despite the looming new security law, protests continue in Hong Kong.
  • For some time, China’s high debt has been a worry. Although there is evidence of increasing stress caused by the global downturn, so far, we are seeing informal methods, such as quiet restructurings and debt service postponement, to avoid outright default and bankruptcy.
  • The U.S. is maintaining military pressure on China. The S. Navy has deployed the USS Ronald Reagan and the USS Nimitz, two aircraft carrier groups, to the Asia/Pacific area.  The USS Theodore Roosevelt was in port at Guam, dealing with an outbreak of COVID-19.  However, according to reports, it is back at sea, giving the U.S. three carrier groups in theater.  This is a show of force that will not go unnoticed by Beijing.
  • China’s auto sales rose 14% in May, the second straight month of recovery.
  • Issues of inequality are not just a concern in the West. China’s high levels of inequality have caught the attention of it’s leaders as well.
  • In the aftermath of the end of Hong Kong’s “one country, two systems” model, relations with the U.K. have clearly deteriorated. It has now moved to the point where it is affecting U.K./China trade.
  • And finally, one of the deep social problems facing China has come from its one-child policy. The CPC rigorously enforced a policy of only allowing one child per family in a bid to slow population growth.  The program did what it was designed to do; China’s population growth slowed and for a number of years, it benefited from a falling dependency ratio.  However, such benefits, absent of high levels of immigration, could not be sustained.  Now, China’s dependency ratio is rising (and from the wrong end—its elderly population is rising much faster than its child population) and it has gender distribution problems.  Due to many families being restricted to one child, steps were often taken to ensure that the only born was male.  As a result, China now faces a demographic problem; it’s getting older and it has too many males relative to females.  Despite easing one-child restrictions, Chinese couples seem reluctant to have larger families.  So, one academic in China has offered a solution—polyandry, where women take on multiple husbands.

COVID-19:   The number of reported cases is 7,397,349 with 417,109 deaths and 3,478,385 recoveries.   In the U.S., there are 2,000,464 confirmed cases with 112,924 deaths and 533,504 recoveries.  For those who like to keep score at home, the FT has created a nifty interactive chart that allows one to compare cases across nations using similar scaling metrics.  And Axios has its map of the U.S. showing infection trends by state.  There are now 15 states with a Rt>1, which means that infections are rising at a faster rate.

Virology:

Commodity news:  Gold prices have been strong in recent months, helped by global uncertainty.  The pandemic has boosted demand as well.  What has been unexpected is the flows of gold to New York.  Although there are lots of ways to buy gold, including physical purchases and ETF’s, perhaps the most sophisticated way to buy the metal is to take delivery on a long futures position.  The delivery can be kept at the Comex vault and can be sold into the futures market at any time.  It is a very low-cost way of transacting a gold purchase.  Banks do something similar with their gold holdings.  Most physical gold is held in London and Zurich, but most of the futures trading occurs in New York.  Most of time, this isn’t a problem; the spread between the futures price and the physical product is small.  However, over the past few months, demand for gold has increased and because shipping has been disrupted due to the pandemic, the spread between futures and cash gold widened.  This forced banks, who were long the physical and short futures, to charter airplanes to deliver gold to the Comex in lieu of making margin calls.  In other gold news, Russia has been increasing its exports of gold; the country is the third largest producer of gold.  In other commodity news, rice prices are rising due to global demand and likely some precautionary inventory purchases.

View the complete PDF

Weekly Energy Update (June 11, 2020)

by Bill O’Grady, Thomas Wash, and Patrick Fearon-Hernandez, CFA

Here is an updated crude oil price chart.  The oil market continues to recover after April’s historic collapse.

(Source: Barchart.com)

Crude oil inventories surprised the markets again, with stockpiles rising 5.7 mb compared to forecasts of a 3.0 mb draw.  The SPR added 2.2 mb this week.

In the details, U.S. crude oil production fell 0.1 mbpd to 11.1 mbpd.  Exports fell 0.4 mbpd, while imports rose 0.7 mbpd.  Refining activity rose 1.3%, above the 0.6% rise forecast.  As we have seen in recent weeks, the level of unaccounted-for crude oil remains elevated.

Unaccounted-for crude oil is a balancing item in the weekly energy balance sheet.  To make the data balance, this line item is a plug figure, but that doesn’t mean it doesn’t matter.  This week’s number is -0.9 mbpd.  For the fifth week in a row, this number is running nearly 1.0 mbpd.  The 12-week average has now gone negative for the first time since October 2017.  It may mean that in the scramble for finding storage, some oil is being inventoried outside the survey system.  This week, some 7.0 mb of crude oil went into storage somewhere, just not where it can be recorded.  Or, production is falling much faster than the DOE estimates are capturing so there aren’t any missing barrels; simply put, production is cratering.  The DOE did indicate it had made modest downward revisions to production, but we are increasingly leaning toward the idea that production is falling rapidly, much faster than the DOE is able to record.

(Sources: DOE, CIM)

The above chart shows the annual seasonal pattern for crude oil inventories.  This week’s data showed a rise in crude oil stockpiles.  We are getting close to the beginning of the seasonal draw for crude oil.  If inventories don’t decline in the coming weeks, oil prices would be vulnerable to a correction.

Based on our oil inventory/price model, fair value is $27.65; using the euro/price model, fair value is $51.76.  The combined model, a broader analysis of the oil price, generates a fair value of $39.87.  We are starting to see a wide divergence between the EUR and oil inventory models.  The weakness we are seeing in the dollar, which we believe may have “legs,” is bullish for crude oil and may overcome the bearish oil inventory overhang.

Although gasoline consumption is improving, the distillate market is becoming a worry.

Distillates are the fuels of commerce; trucks, trains, planes and ships run on this fuel.  The weakness in consumption suggests that wholesale activity is probably slumping.  Perhaps the restocking of inventory that occurred after the initial decline is waning and the subsequent pickup is soft.  But the weakness here will tend to keep refinery activity slow and may cap the recent recovery in oil prices.

Although there are anecdotal reports that shale production may be restarting, history shows that there is about a five-month lag between prices and drilling activity.  That would suggest production overall will likely remain depressed well into Q4.

This chart shows oil and gas drilling activity from the industrial production data; in general, oil prices lead this measure by about five months.  If this pattern is maintained (and there is little reason to see why it won’t), we probably won’t see a recovery in drilling until much later this year, which is bullish for crude oil prices.

In politics and geopolitics this week, Iran has built a likeness of an aircraft carrier to allow its naval forces to train against.  Iran did something similar in 2015.  As U.S. forces leave Iraq, Islamic State activities are returning.  Although they are not in oil-producing areas, a return of IS would be bad news for Iraq.  We continue to monitor developments in Libya; currently, Khalifa Hifter’s forces have been reeling in the face of Islamic-leaning groups in western Libya who have been supported by Turkey.  We are seeing intermittent oil output disruptions.  China has been showing interest in increasing its influence in the Middle East.  Given China’s oil dependence, increasing its activity in the region makes sense, especially as the U.S. reduces its regional footprint.  However, we are surprised at Beijing’s increasing interest in Syria, which is a very small oil producer.  It will be interesting to see how Putin reacts to such behavior.  Although elements within the Democratic Party have pushed to severely restrict oil and gas drilling for environmental reasons, minority groups within the party are pushing for jobs in the sector.

View the PDF

Daily Comment (June 10, 2020)

by Bill O’Grady, Thomas Wash, and Patrick Fearon-Hernandez, CFA

[Posted: 9:30 AM EDT]

The relatively muted tenor in risk assets so far today comes as investors look forward to the Fed’s latest policy decision, forecast update and Chairman Powell’s news conference this afternoon.  We’ve also seen some pessimistic forecasts for the global economy from the OECD, signs the Republicans are pushing back harder against the next fiscal stimulus bill and the possibility of a future military takeover in Brazil.  We review all the key news below.

United States:  Today the Fed will wrap up its latest two day policy meeting.  As we’ve mentioned before, the policymakers have made it clear they don’t want negative interest rates, so the benchmark Fed funds rate will be held unchanged at essentially 0.0%.  The real debate will likely be over yield curve control.  Besides watching that debate closely, we’ll be parsing the policymakers’ latest forecasts for the economy and the future Fed funds rate.

COVID-19:  Official data show confirmed cases have risen to 7,264,866 worldwide, with 411,879 deaths and 3,394,970 recoveries.  In the United States, confirmed cases rose to 1,979,893, with 112,006 deaths and 524,855 recoveries.  Here is the interactive chart from the Financial Times that allows you to compare cases and deaths among countries, scaled by population.

Virology

Real Economy

U.S. Policy Response

United States-Germany:  Nearly two dozen Republican House members are urging the Trump administration to reconsider its decision to drastically cut the number of American troops assigned to Germany, according to a letter viewed by the Wall Street Journal.  In the letter, the Congressmen argue that, “such steps would significantly damage U.S. national security as well as strengthen the position of Russia to our detriment.”

United States-Russia-China:  Even though the U.S. and Russia have officially invited China to participate in the new arms control talks to open in Vienna later this month, Chinese officials have reportedly rejected the invitation.  Moreover, Russian Deputy Foreign Minister Ryabkov poured cold water on any hope that Russia would pressure China to participate.  The development undermines hope that a new, multilateral nuclear arms treaty can be signed to follow the U.S.-Russia New START agreement that expires next February.

EU-Russia-China:  The European Commission issued a report accusing Russia and China of conducting targeted influence operations and disinformation campaigns about COVID-19 in the EU, its neighborhood and globally.  The report accuses Moscow and Beijing of trying to “undermine democratic debate and exacerbate social polarization and improve their own image in the COVID-19 context.”

EU:  As EU members jostle to shape the bloc’s upcoming budget and coronavirus recovery fund to their liking, countries including Belgium and Ireland are arguing that more funds may be needed because of the risk of a hard Brexit at the end of the year, on top of the economic damage from the COVID-19 shutdowns.  EU and British negotiators continue to talk but are making little progress on a trade deal for the period after December 31.  Separately, Portuguese Finance Minister Centeno resigned his position, forcing him to also give up his role as head of the EU finance ministers’ group.  The proposed EU budget and recovery fund, including the idea of issuing common EU bonds, will be discussed next week by national leaders rather than finance ministers.  All the same, given Centeno’s pivotal role in pushing through the EU’s fiscal support packages to date, his departure increases the odds that the debt mutualization proposal could be rejected or substantially modified.

Brazil:  One of President Bolsonaro’s sons, who has previously praised the country’s past military dictatorship, said a similar break with democracy in Brazil is now inevitable.  The statement adds to signs that Bolsonaro is leaning toward a military takeover of the country as he deals with the coronavirus crisis, political scandals and fleeing foreign investors.  The political instability associated with any military takeover would likely be at least a near-term negative for Brazilian assets.

View the complete PDF

Daily Comment (June 9, 2020)

by Bill O’Grady, Thomas Wash, and Patrick Fearon-Hernandez, CFA

[Posted: 9:30 AM EDT]

Our newest podcast episode, “The Long-Term Effects of COVID-19,” is available.  In this episode, we discuss how the COVID-19 pandemic will likely accelerate the reversal of the equality/efficiency cycle toward equality.

Many countries continue to report falling coronavirus infection rates and economic reopening, helping to push the NASDAQ to a record close yesterday.  All the same, it appears that the official declaration of a recession in the U.S. and sobering trade data from Germany have helped spark some profit-taking in the financial markets today.  As always, we recap all the key news below.

United States:  Yesterday, the arbiter of the U.S. business cycles, the National Bureau of Economic Research, officially declared that the economic expansion that began in March 2009 came to an end in February 2020.  The surprise wasn’t that the NBER’s Business Cycle Dating Committee believes the U.S. economy has been in recession ever since then.  Just about all economists and financial market analysts around the world, ourselves included, have thought that for some time.  The surprise was that the group moved so quickly to declare the recession, rather than waiting until deep in the downturn or even later like it usually does.  The quick designation likely reflects the extreme depth of the pullback, which has made it obvious to just about everyone.  The big question is whether a recovery is at hand, and if so, how long and robust it will be.  We think things have stopped getting worse and the recovery is now starting.  The NBER therefore, could declare an end to the recession sooner than it has in the past.  Given the depth of the decline, however, we suspect the recovery back to the previous level of activity will be long and fitful.  A key risk is that officials could withdraw the supportive monetary and fiscal policies they’ve deployed to date and take the wind out of the recovery’s sails.  Indeed, yesterday Senate Majority Leader McConnell and White House advisor Hassett both suggested that improving employment numbers would mean any further fiscal packages to support the economy could be scaled back.

COVID-19:  Official data show confirmed cases have risen to 7,142,462 worldwide, with 407,067 deaths and 3,316,747 recoveries.  In the United States, confirmed cases rose to 1,961,187, with 111,007 deaths and 518,522 recoveries.  Here is the interactive chart from the Financial Times that allows you to compare cases and deaths among countries, scaled by population.

Virology

Real Economy

  • German exports dropped by a record 24.0% in April, coming in worse than expected and leaving foreign shipments for the month down 31.0% from April 2019.  Imports also contracted sharply in April, with a drop of 23.6% from the previous month.  As shown in the tables below, this produced a sharp drop in the country’s trade balance for April.
  • Although weakened demand from the crisis has driven down overall inflation so far, many food prices are rising at their fastest pace in decades.  This has the potential to further weigh on overall demand, as consumers are especially sensitive to rising costs for essentials like food.

U.S. Policy Response

  • As we mentioned yesterday, today is the first day of the Fed’s latest two-day policy meeting.  Given that the policymakers have made it clear they don’t want negative interest rates, the benchmark fed funds rate will be held unchanged at essentially 0.0%.  The real debate will likely be over yield curve control.  Besides watching that debate closely, we’ll be parsing the policymakers’ latest forecasts for the economy and the future fed funds rate.
  • The Fed announced another set of changes to its Main Street Lending Program for small and medium businesses. This is as it strives to make the $500 billion program more attractive to borrowers and banks, without taking undue credit risk when it ramps up in the coming weeks.  The loans still will be run through the nation’s banks, which can sell 95% of the loans to the Fed, but under the latest set of changes:
    • The minimum loan amount will be reduced to $250,000 from $500,000, which will make the program more attractive to smaller firms.
    • The maximum loan amount will be raised to $35 million for new loans, or up to $300 million to refinance an existing loan if a firm’s total debt, relative to its 2019 earnings, is below certain thresholds. Those maximum loan amounts had been set at $25 million and $200 million, respectively, in late April.
    • The maximum loan term will be extended to five years from four years previously.
    • Businesses will be allowed to defer principal payments for the first two years instead of just the first year.

Foreign Policy Response

NATO-China:  NATO General Secretary Stoltenberg called for nations around the world to join with the alliance to resist China’s “bullying and coercion.”  In his speech, Stoltenberg warned that, “The rise of China is fundamentally shifting the global balance of power, heating up the race for economic and technological supremacy, multiplying the threats to open societies and individual freedoms and increasing the competition over our values and our way of life.”  While there is now broad consensus around the world regarding China’s aggressive moves to build, expand and exercise its power, Stoltenberg’s statement reflects what may be another growing consensus:  That because of China’s size and aggressiveness, resisting it will probably require the combined power of many like-minded democracies operating in alliance, i.e., not just individual countries pushing back against China, but a clash of Western Civilizations against a Chinese Civilization seeking its renaissance.

China-Hong Kong:  Hong Kong-based hedge funds are exploring ways to move their operations elsewhere as China prepares to impose sweeping national security legislation on the city.  According to one advisor who works with hedge funds in the city and elsewhere in the region, “Hong Kong as we know it is dead.  It will become just another city in China. The hedge fund community will move on to Singapore and elsewhere.”  Separately, thousands of protesters rallied Tuesday evening in downtown Hong Kong, defying a police ban on demonstrations to mark the one-year anniversary of a million-person rally that thrust the city into its biggest turmoil in decades.

North Korea-South Korea:  The North Korean state news agency KCNA said the inter-Korean communication line by which the two governments speak daily, as well as a separate hotline to the South Korean president, will be severed from midday on Tuesday.  The move is in retaliation for South Korean non-governmental groups that have been sending balloons and drones to drop anti-North Korean leaflets over the country, though it probably also reflects Kim Jong Un’s frustration at the collapse of the denuclearization talks with the U.S.

United States-Russia-China:  U.S. Special Envoy for Arms Control Billingslea said the U.S. and Russia have agreed to open a new round of arms control talks in Vienna later this month, and that China has been invited to participate as well.  The talks may include discussions to extend the New START nuclear arms treaty that is due to expire in February 2021.

View the complete PDF

Weekly Geopolitical Report – The Geopolitics of the 2020 Election: Part III (June 8, 2020)

by Bill O’Grady | PDF

In this five-part series on the geopolitics of the 2020 election, we have divided the reports into nine sections. Last week, in Part II, we discussed the second and third sections, understanding the electorate and party coalitions.  In this report, we continue our coverage with the fourth and fifth sections, the incidence of the establishment coalition and the impact of social media.

Read the full report

Daily Comment (June 8, 2020)

by Bill O’Grady, Thomas Wash, and Patrick Fearon-Hernandez, CFA

[Posted: 9:30 AM EDT]

Our newest podcast episode, “The Long-Term Effects of COVID-19,” is available.  In this episode, we discuss how the COVID-19 pandemic will likely accelerate the reversal of the equality/efficiency cycle toward equality.

Good morning and happy Monday!  Global stocks are mixed; Europe is lower on disappointing German data, while U.S. equity futures are ticking higherTropical Depression Cristobal hit Louisiana over the weekend and remnants are expected in St. Louis on Tuesday.  The Fed meets this week; we will get forecasts and maybe a dots plot.  Brexit fears are rising; we look at the looming trade deadline and other European trade issues.  We update on China and touch on its trade data.  The U.S. is pulling troops from Germany.  OPEC+ has a deal and oil prices are higher.  We update COVID-19, focusing on U.S. and global reopening from lockdown.  Additionally, we have some Monday charts!  Here is the update:

Policy news:  The Fed meets this week.  There is absolutely no mystery on the policy rate; since the FOMC has made it clear it doesn’t want negative fed funds, there really isn’t more to be done on that front.  Instead, we expect the debate to be over yield curve control.  This isn’t exactly new for the Fed; during WWII, the central bank fixed rates across the entire yield curve to control Treasury borrowing costs.  However, the impact of such control would be significant.  For example, the Treasury curve would no longer be a forecasting tool; we might be able to use the corporate curve, but even there, one would expect some relationship to the risk-free rate.  The other issue we will be watching for are forecasts for the economy and the policy rate.  The bigger issue here is that if the Fed goes this far, it has essentially ceded its independence.  It can get it back at some point, but it will be a war because no president wants to be in office when the Fed stops the stimulus.  Harry Truman would concur, we suspect.

Brexit and trade:  Although the actual exit date isn’t until year’s end, if the U.K. is going to ask the EU for an extension of Brexit negotiations, it must do so by June 30.  By all accounts, PM Johnson has made it clear that he will not ask for an extension, so the odds of a hard break are risingTrade officials and businesses are beginning to count the costs of a hard border with Europe.  A concern has been that British negotiators don’t seem clear on what they want from an agreement with the EU.  One of the benefits of a hard break is that the U.K. can make trade deals with other nations; Westminster is looking to make a deal with the U.S. in short order.  The U.S. has made it clear that such a deal would include U.S. agriculture, including the infamous “chlorine chickens.”  The issue of the U.S. and EU food regulation and trade is nothing new, but could become an issue when the U.S. and U.K. begin trade talks.

China:  A sharp decline in imports offset a drop in exports, expanding China’s global trade surplus.

Meanwhile, analysts are questioning China’s employment data, suggesting it is painting too rosy a picture of China’s recovery.  Recent policy statements seem to confirm this notion.  Lastly, China’s drive to semiconductor self-sufficiency has been lagging badly.

Foreign news:  The U.S. announced over the weekend that nine thousand U.S. troops will be leaving Germany.  Relations between Berlin and Washington have been strained for some time; while some commentators are suggesting this decision is supportive for Russia, that may not be the case.  Poland is hoping that the U.S. will move these forces to its soil.  The U.S. is threatening both the EU and China over lobster tariffs.  EU support has, for now, reduced financial stress in Italy.

OPEC:  As expected, OPEC and Russia have reached a deal to extend supply cuts.  Russia and Saudi Arabia were able to corral some of the smaller producers in OPEC, which have been overproducing; of course agreeing is one thing, cutting is another.

COVID-19:  The number of reported cases is 7,036,623 with 403,131 deaths and 3,153,223 recoveries.  In the U.S., there are 1,942,363 confirmed cases with 108,211 deaths and 506,367 recoveries.  For those who like to keep score at home, the FT has created a nifty interactive chart that allows one to compare cases across nations using similar scaling metrics.  The news surrounding the virus, across the world, is the next phase of the crisis—the reopening.  Europe is easing restrictions; British pubs are scheduled to reopen June 22.  As we are seeing in the U.S., there are regional differences, with some European nations opening to all travelers, others creating travel bubbles, allowing free entry of some nations, restrictions from others.  Meanwhile, in the U.S., New York is starting to reopen.  In the U.S., there is evidence that as social distancing restrictions ease, infections are rising.  This should be no surprise.  The point of the lockdowns were to control the rise of infections so the health system could cope.  However, the economic costs of the lockdowns were high and, barring a mutation in the virus that turns it into something with a fatality ratio similar to smallpox, we doubt we will see broad lockdowns repeated.  Thus, the fear of the “rise in autumn” that is often discussed is probably not that great of a risk to the economy.  Instead, we expect to see targeted measures, which would protect the most vulnerable from infection while leaving the rest of the economy to normalize.  In Brazil, the government is limiting the release of virus data.

Monday charts:  Here are three charts we have been working on.  First, Friday’s employment data raised great hopes that a recovery is underway.  We tend to agree with that idea; as we stated in a recent Asset Allocation Weekly, recoveries start when conditions stop getting worse.  Given the catastrophic drop in growth, it should be no surprise that conditions are improving.  However, it is important not to confuse the trough with the path of the recovery.  The economy is in a deep hole that will take a long time to dig out of.

In this chart, we index the level of employment to the peak before the onset of recession.  Each recession is measured to see how long it takes before the previous cycle high is met.  There is nothing in the postwar experience that matches what we are seeing here.  So, if policymakers take Friday’s data as a reason to hold off on additional stimulus, it could be an epic mistake.

Meanwhile, the recovery in equities has been surprising.  This chart shows the weekly Friday closes from the onset of recession; we rebased the S&P to the market peak prior to the beginning of each recession.

Two things are notable about the current cycle. First, the decline was the fastest in the postwar experience.  The cascading decline in February and March was extremely fast.  Second, the recovery has been remarkable as well.  Only two earlier recessions, the 2001 and 1956, have the index higher than we are currently.  The 2001 recession was very mild; the 1956 recession occurred during the Asian flu pandemic, although the drop was mostly attributed to monetary policy.  The 1956 recession was very deep but short, which is similar to what we are expecting.  Here is a note of caution; the average line shows that sideways performance tends to follow once the initial bounce occurs.  We would not be surprised to see markets consolidate at some point.  On the other hand, we have never seen this degree of policy support in the postwar world.

 

Finally, this is the weekly S&P chart compared to retail MMK fund levels[1]; the orange bars show periods where MMK fell below $920 billion, which tended to coincide with market consolidations.  We have been noting rising caution among retail investors since 2018 when the trade conflict with China escalated.  Even with the strong rally in equities from Q3 2018 into Q3 2019, retail MMK continued to rise.  Cash levels have continued to rise through the recent decline and recovery in the S&P.  Note that the bull market that began in March 2009 was fueled by a decline in retail MMK; if a similar pattern develops in this cycle, we could see further gains in equities.

View the complete PDF

Asset Allocation Weekly (June 5, 2020)

by Asset Allocation Committee

Last week, we discussed how equity markets, because of their anticipatory nature, tend to bottom in advance of the end of recessions.  Assuming that condition continues, if our expectations for a short recession (but probably a long recovery) are correct, it would make sense that the equity market would have already bottomed.  That historical pattern, coupled with extraordinarily supportive monetary policy, is supporting equity values.

The view of the economy for most Americans is the job market.  In general, the common belief is that a good economy is one with a good job market.  Economists tend to take a broader view and assume that the economy is more than just jobs.  And so, when overall economic activity recovers, recessions are declared over.  However, there are numerous cases where the economy and equity markets are doing fine, while the labor markets are still sluggish.

This chart shows the S&P 500 with the unemployment rate.  We have placed black vertical lines at the trough of the equity index (using S&P 500 monthly averages) and a red line at the peak of unemployment.  Here is a table of the results.

This table shows that equities trough about seven months before the peak of the unemployment rate.  Thus, if the unemployment rate has peaked the turn in equity markets seen in recent weeks would be consistent with that pattern.  The full recovery in the labor markets will take much longer, but we do expect labor market conditions will steadily improve.

View the PDF