Daily Comment (July 1, 2020)

by Bill O’Grady, Thomas Wash, and Patrick Fearon-Hernandez, CFA

[Posted: 9:30 AM EDT]

A slew of purchasing managers’ indexes from around the world today show manufacturing activity is either growing again, or declining at a much milder pace than at the initial peak of the coronavirus crisis (see tables below).  However, renewed infection outbreaks and lockdowns are taking the wind out of investors’ sails, as are renewed tensions with China after its imposition of a new national security law on Hong Kong.  We present all the key news below.

COVID-19:  Official data show confirmed cases have risen to 10,501,482 worldwide, with 511,909 deaths and 5,378,800 recoveries.  In the United States, confirmed cases rose to 2,636,538, with 127,425 deaths and 720,631 recoveries.  Here is the interactive chart from the Financial Times that allows you to compare cases and deaths among countries, scaled by population.

Virology

Economic Impact

 

U.S. Policy Response

China-Hong Kong:  The Hong Kong municipal government officially published the text of the new national security law imposed on it by Beijing yesterday, putting the legislation into effect just one hour before today’s 23rd anniversary of Britain’s handover of Hong Kong to China.  The full text of the law, which can be found here, is largely consistent with the hints and summaries provided by Chinese officials over the last few weeks.  In other words, the legislation seems as bad as feared, which will further tamp down anti-China political opposition in Hong Kong and exacerbate tensions with the U.S. and other Western democracies.  Police in Hong Kong today made their first arrests under the law when a group of protestors tried to hold a demonstration marking the 1997 handover of Hong Kong to China.  Under the law,

  • Secessionist, subversive, and terrorist activities against China, or Hong Kong are criminalized beginning today, as are acts of collusion with foreign forces that endanger national security. The collusion offenses include espionage and efforts to impose sanctions against China, or Hong Kong, as well as inciting hatred against the central or local government.  Punishments include jail terms up to life in prison.
  • Any person who commits offenses defined by the legislation are subject to the law’s provisions, even if they are outside Hong Kong and aren’t permanent residents of the territory. It wasn’t clear how this provision would be implemented.
  • China’s central government is empowered to supervise the policing of subversive activities in Hong Kong and, in some cases, intervene directly. Its provisions would supersede Hong Kong legislation should there be inconsistencies between them.
  • A special council formed by Hong Kong officials and led by the city’s chief executive has responsibility for enforcing the law. Their work will be confidential, with decisions not subject to judicial reviews.
  • Within the municipal police force, a special unit will be set up to handle national security cases.  Beyond the police’s usual powers in criminal investigations, the law allows the special police unit to put suspects under secret surveillance with authorization from the city’s chief executive.
  • Hong Kong’s government is also required to strengthen its scrutiny and management of schools, civic organizations, media and the Internet, and use these platforms to educate local residents on matters related to national security.
  • A dedicated central-government office in Hong Kong will oversee national-security affairs, and its personnel are empowered to gather and analyze intelligence, as well as advise and supervise local authorities on security matters. Its personnel won’t be subjected to Hong Kong law when they are carrying out their duties.

China-Hong Kong-United States:  Just after the publication of the new Hong Kong security law, a bipartisan group of U.S. senators and representatives introduced legislation that would offer refugee status to Hong Kong residents at risk of persecution under it.  The legislation would require the State Department to give special status to Hong Kong residents and certain family members who suffered persecution, or have a well-founded fear of it, due to their expression of political opinions, or peaceful participation in political activities. The paperwork could be completed in Hong Kong or in a third country, and refugees would then be able to apply for permanent residency and citizenship. The opportunity, which wouldn’t be restricted by the current U.S. cap on refugees, would be valid for five years from the date of the bill’s passage.

Russia:  The country will finish voting today on a series of constitutional changes that would allow President Putin to run for two more terms in office and stay in power until 2036.  To sweeten the pot, the amendments also include a range of social and nationalist goodies such as guaranteeing social benefits and a ban on “belittling the significance” of Russia’s victory over Nazi Germany in World War II (though voters can only vote for or against the entire package).  And in case that’s not enough to drive participation, posters and mass text messages are promising Muscovites “a million prizes” through raffles in exchange for voting, officials are pressuring public employees to vote and large state companies are offering their own prizes for doing so via QR codes that could be used to track people at polling stations.  A positive outcome for Putin seems little in doubt.

Germany:  Defense Minister Annegret Kramp-Karrenbauer is dissolving a unit of the country’s special forces, known as the Kommando Spezialkräfte (KSK) after some of its members were found to have radical rightwing sympathies.  The KSK will also be restructured and stripped of control over its training.

United States-Mexico-Canada:  The new U.S.-Mexico-Canada (USMCA) trade agreement, which updated the previous NAFTA deal, officially went into effect today.

View the complete PDF

Daily Comment (June 30, 2020)

by Bill O’Grady, Thomas Wash, and Patrick Fearon-Hernandez, CFA

[Posted: 9:30 AM EDT]

U.S. risk assets are little changed today as encouraging economic data out of China is being largely offset by reports of renewed coronavirus outbreaks and lockdowns in many key U.S. states and some foreign localities.  At the same time, geopolitics are rising to the forefront again, with China passing its new national security law for Hong Kong and Australia boosting its cyber-defenses against Chinese aggression.  We present all the key news below.

COVID-19:  Official data show confirmed cases have risen to 10,417,063 worldwide, with 509,474 deaths and 5,255,829 recoveries.  In the United States, confirmed cases rose to 2,682,897, with 129,544 deaths and 705,203 recoveries.  Here is the interactive chart from the Financial Times that allows you to compare cases and deaths among countries, scaled by population.

Virology

  • Surging coronavirus cases in California, Arizona, Texas and Florida are reportedly straining hospital systems and maxing out the capacity of their intensive care units.  In Phoenix, where ICU units at several hospitals are already full, some are reportedly refusing to admit patients arriving by ambulance to the emergency room.  When a community’s health system is overwhelmed, it tends to prompt government officials to take action they otherwise wouldn’t take, and it can have a significant negative impact on people’s confidence.  The development could prompt renewed economic restrictions and undermine political support for current incumbents in key localities, so it’s an important risk for the equity markets.
  • Just as Florida and Texas did last week, Arizona has responded to the surge in caseloads and stress on the hospital system by putting its economic reopening into reverse.  Governor Ducey said yesterday that the state would immediately close all bars, gyms and cinemas for at least one month.  Separately, New Jersey halted plans to allow indoor restaurant operations and New York’s governor said he is considering a similar move, while Tennessee’s government said its state of emergency would be extended.  Curiously, even as states continue to stretch their traditional health and welfare responsibilities into stringent economic lockdowns, few of the new announcements touched on the imperfect but much simpler and less costly measure of requiring people to wear facemasks in public.
  • Meanwhile, in Britain, the city of Leicester and surrounding areas have been placed under renewed lockdown in response to a resurgence in COVID-19 cases.  Health Secretary Matt Hancock said non-essential shops had been told to close on Tuesday and schools asked to shut their doors to the majority of their pupils from Thursday.  Classes will remain open for vulnerable children and children of critical workers.
  • In India, the government said schools would stay shut for another month and restrictions would be extended until the end of July on nonessential services and movement of persons in containment zones—coronavirus hot spots where lockdowns are still in effect. A nighttime curfew will also be kept in place across the country.
  • The FDA today will outline its conditions for approving a COVID-19 vaccine, including a requirement that any vaccine be at least 50% more effective than a placebo in preventing the disease.  According to the Wall Street Journal, the agency will also say that a vaccine won’t be approved simply if it leads to antibodies in the bloodstream of patients, on grounds that it is not known what level of antibodies will confer protection.  The guidance will also reportedly say that no vaccine would be approved unless a vaccine company had “clearly demonstrated” proof of a vaccine’s safety and effectiveness through a clinical study.
  • WHO Director General Ghebreyesus warned that the virus pandemic is far from over and the worst could yet come.  He also said the WHO would send a second team to China to investigate the source of the pathogen.

U.S. Policy Response

  • Federal Reserve Chair Powell and Treasury Secretary Mnuchin will testify before the House Financial Services Committee today on the coronavirus crisis and the policies implemented to fight it, as required by economic support legislation passed in March.  According to his prepared remarks, Powell will say that even though the economy appears to have bounced back faster than previously expected, there is still significant uncertainty as to whether the virus will be kept in check and how the economy will grow from here.  If Powell sticks to that theme, it will probably be interpreted as confirmation that monetary policy will remain extraordinarily accommodative, which would be supportive of the markets.

Foreign Policy Response

  • In an effort to build momentum for the European Commission’s proposed €750 billion post-coronavirus recovery fund, which would be financed with common EU debt, German Chancellor Merkel assured the “frugal four” nations opposed to the idea that all EU countries must also be willing to reform their economies and make them more “future-proof.”  Merkel expressed confidence that EU leaders would reach agreement on the fund and on the bloc’s new budget at a summit due to be held in July, although she admitted there is still a “long way to go.”  If Merkel’s gambit helps push the recovery fund forward, it will likely be positive for European assets and negative for the dollar, at least in part because the common EU debt would help create conditions for the euro to eventually become a true reserve currency to rival the greenback.

China-Hong Kong:  In an extraordinary meeting, China’s rubber-stamp legislature gave final approval to a new national security law for Hong Kong and President Xi immediately signed it, though full details are still to be released.  Demonstrating how swiftly the new law is affecting Hong Kong politics, anti-China activist Joshua Wong disbanded his Demosisto opposition party and urged pro-democracy leaders to use “more flexible” methods to resist Chinese influence on Hong Kong.

China-India:  New Delhi announced it would ban dozens of Chinese mobile apps from being downloaded or used in India, citing this month’s China-India border clashes in the Himalayas and the possibility that the apps could be used to monitor and profile Indian citizens.  According to a senior Indian official, “This is India’s first salvo to China after the border clashes, showing that India has a diverse range of retaliatory options.”  The move deprives some of China’s biggest and most important technology firms from accessing India’s large, fast-growing market.  It may therefore encourage similar moves by the U.S. or other countries that are concerned about China’s growing assertiveness.

China-Australia:  The Australian government is recruiting 500 additional cyber spies and making its largest-ever investment in digital security after a breakdown in diplomatic relations with China and mutual allegations of espionage activity.  The investment of almost $1 billion over a decade follows a warning from Prime Minister Morrison that the nation’s government, companies and educational institutions have been under sustained attack from a “sophisticated state actor.”

Russia-Libya:  The Russian government is sending additional fighters, weapons and cash to Libyan opposition leader Khalifa Haftar, who is on the defensive after a failed effort to topple the country’s UN-backed government.  In an effort to maintain influence in the country in case Haftar loses further support, the Russians are reportedly also building relationships with alternative opposition leaders, including Aguila Saleh.

United States:  A nonprofit higher education research organization said overall enrollment at U.S. colleges and universities this spring was down 1.7% from a year earlier, marking the seventh straight year of annual declines.  The drop was most severe for four-year, for-profit institutions and smaller, nonprofit schools.  Many large public and private nonprofit schools saw increased enrollment.

View the complete PDF

Weekly Geopolitical Report – The Geopolitics of the Eurobond (June 29, 2020)

by Bill O’Grady | PDF

(N.B.  Due to the Independence Day holiday, the next report will be published on July 13.)

A global hegemon provides two broad categories of public goods.  The first is security.  A successful hegemon enforces some degree of global security as it has the ability to project power globally.  This power projection ostensibly prevents regional wars from becoming world wars.  Another way of thinking about hegemony is that if a world war occurs, it is evidence of hegemonic failure.  In addition to war suppression, the hegemon’s global reach gives it the capability to secure sea lanes, which facilitates global trade.

The second public good is financial.  The hegemon provides the reserve currency which enables global trade and investment.  The reserve currency nation must have two characteristics to be a successful provider of the reserve currency.  First, it must be willing to run persistent current account deficits.  It is through trade that the rest of the world acquires the reserve currency. Persistent current account deficits put great strain on the labor markets of the hegemon and require a strong commitment from the reserve currency nation to absorb these imports.  Second, it must have deep financial markets and an instrument that is considered safe and widely available so nations that accumulate the reserve currency can use this instrument to hold this saving until it is needed for trade or direct investment.

If the U.S. is going to be replaced as a hegemon, the successor will need to fill these two roles.  Currently, there is no nation that is capable or willing to fully provide these public goods.  However, it is not impossible to consider a situation where a partial replacement occurs.  Such outcomes have occurred before.  By the late 1800s, Britain realized that it could not defend any of its colonies in the Western Hemisphere from a determined American attack.  The U.S. economy was too well developed and its navy and army too large; the costs of defending Canada, for example, would have been excessive.  So, quietly, the British ceded regional hegemony, at least in terms of security, to the U.S.  That allowed Westminster to focus on the other growing threat, Germany.  In the current environment, the U.S. could cede a sphere of influence to China.  It is arguable that the U.S. would like to see a regional hegemon arise in the Middle East to allow America to reduce its security burden there as well.

Something similar could occur on the reserve currency front as well.  Some economists, notably Barry Eichengreen, have argued that there is the potential for multiple reserve currencies.  Although we have had doubts about this possibility, recent developments have led us to consider the possibility that the euro could become a serious competitor for the dollar as a reserve asset.  That doesn’t mean the euro would replace the dollar as the reserve currency, but it would mean the euro could be a parallel reserve currency and offer competition to the dollar.

The most recent development that could create potential competition for the dollar’s reserve status is the proposed new financial instrument designed to fund Europe’s recovery from the pandemic.  The proposal evolved from a plan developed by Germany and France to create a €500 billion recovery fund.  European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen expanded the proposal, increasing it to €750 billion.  But the key element of the proposal is a specific bond backed by the full faith and credit of the European Union.  The bond service would be tied to several EU-wide revenue sources, including a proposed digital tax, a carbon border tax and fees on transportation.

The proposed plan still requires approval by all members of the EU.  The “frugal four”—Austria, Denmark, the Netherlands and Sweden—could still scuttle the proposal.  But, Germany’s support is a reversal of its longstanding opposition to EU debt mutualization and will probably be enough to sway the opposition toward accepting the program.

The prospect of debt mutualization creates competition for the dollar’s reserve status.  The EU doesn’t fulfill the other requirements for hegemony; its military strength has atrophied, and it has not shown a willingness to run persistent current account deficits.  Nevertheless, a mutualized debt instrument does make the euro a much more attractive currency for reserve purposes.

In this report, we will examine why an alternative reserve currency might be attractive for several countries.  An analysis of why Germany has changed its position on debt mutualization will follow.  As always, we will conclude with market ramifications.

Read the full report

Daily Comment (June 29, 2020)

by Bill O’Grady, Thomas Wash, and Patrick Fearon-Hernandez, CFA

[Posted: 9:30 AM EDT]

Good morning, and happy Monday!  U.S. equity futures are currently pointing to a modest rise in a holiday-shortened week.  We update the COVID-19 news.  In foreign news, we cover the Poland elections and a new government in Ireland.  The end of stimulus measures is looming in the U.S.  We update weather news.  Here are the details:

COVID-19:   The number of reported cases is 10,154,984 with 502,048 deaths and 5,147,436 recoveries.  In the U.S., there are 2,549,069 confirmed cases with 125,803 deaths and 685,164 recoveries.  For those who like to keep score at home, the FT has created a nifty interactive chart that allows one to compare cases across nations using similar scaling metrics.  State infection rates are showing a definite rise.

Virology: 

  • We have been monitoring reports that the virus may be mutating. A paper out of China suggests that COVID-19 has indeed mutated from its form in China to a more virulent form in Europe.  A mutation, named D614G, increases the number of spikes on the virus, enhancing its ability to infect.  The mutation has made the virus more contagious by increasing its shedding.   This development may explain why the virus initially seemed to be about as problematic as influenza and has become something worse.  There are also reports that the virus has developed in such a way that it sends out “fingers” that increase the pace of infection.
  • Last week, in the face of rising infections, Texas and Florida took the aggressive actions to close bars, ban the sale of alcohol consumption and limit restaurant seating.   The population infected in the South does appear different than what we saw in the Northeast.  The current infections are hitting younger Americans and thus we are seeing fewer fatalities per infection.
  • Doctors are finding that even asymptomatic patients with COVID-19 are showing signs of lung damage. How serious the damage is remains uncertain.
  • Health officials are considering a new testing strategy, pool testing. In a pool test, a single test is administered to a group of people.  If all test negative, it is assumed the entire pool is infection free.   This method allows for a much larger testing base with the same level of resources, and, with careful sorting, can even increase the power of the testing.  It has two downsides.  First, a false negative means a much larger problem because it means the entire pool is considered safe, but it may not be.  Second, the process of pooling itself can dilute the sample, increasing the odds of a false negative.
  • There is evidence that COVID-19 is causing psychiatric and neurological problems in patients. The symptoms include strokes, encephalitis, and encephalopathy.  Some patients exhibited evidence of dementia and psychosis.
  • There remains hope that a vaccine will be developed by late 2020. We remain skeptical that it will occur in this short time frame.  However, a vaccine isn’t the only path to reducing the risk of the virus.  Antiviral treatments could also reduce the virulence of the disease; AIDS has been controlled by this path.  Three[1] new anti-viral drugs are being tested; all three are currently used in treating cancer, so if they work on COVID-19, they could be deployed rapidly.

Policy news:

China news:

  • China has been aggressively building out its 5G network. Although the U.S. has been working to reduce Chinese tech firms’ ability to sell 5G products abroad, China also needs to import products for its domestic build out.  Apparently, Japanese firms have been aiding this effort.  We will be watching to see if Washington takes steps to end this practice.
  • The PBOC is promising to take stronger measures to support the Chinese economy.

Technology news:

Foreign news:

  • Andrzej Duda won a plurality in this weekend’s election in Poland but not a majority. A second round of elections will be held on July 12th, where he will face Warsaw Mayor Rafał Trzaskowski, who won second place.
  • Ireland has a new PM, Macheal Martin; he will govern a three-party coalition of Fianna Fail, Leo Varadkar’s Fine Gael and the Green Party. Sinn Fein, the political arm of the IRA, will be the official opposition.  The current PM, Varadkar, will be deputy PM and will take over the PM jog in 30 months.   This is a “grand coalition” of sorts; for the first time since the founding of the modern Irish republic, Fianna Fail and Fane Gael will form a coalition.  This is mostly because neither could agree to form a government with Sinn Fein.
  • Russia is increasing its arms sales to Turkey and India. The former is a member of NATO and a long-time U.S. ally; the arms relationship with Russia has been an unwelcome development.  India, on the other hand, is a long-term client of Russia’s arms industry but is being courted by the U.S. in a bid to contain China.  The arms sales will likely not cause problems for New Delhi, but we would expect U.S. arms makers to try and encourage India to begin using U.S. platforms.  This will be especially the case if relations become closer.
  • Despite U.S. opposition, it appears the EU will be moving ahead to implement digital taxes. The U.S. opposes this move because it is seen as a threat to the American tech firms.
  • The EU has also slapped tariffs on an Egyptian fiberglass firm that was built in conjunction with the Chinese “one belt, one road” project.  This action will be seen as a snub to Beijing.
  • Lebanon is in the midst of a debt and currency crisis. The currency has lost 75% of its value in the unofficial market and its external debt is over 186% of GDP and the country is in default.  Demonstrations took place late last week to protest declining living conditions.  Although the level of anger is palpable, it is not clear at all how the situation will be resolved.
  • The State Department says Iran has become a haven for al Qaeda. Although we doubt much will come from this news, it could be used as a pretext for retaliation, either kinetic or financial, by the U.S.
  • Late last year, Congress passed the Caesar Act, makes sanctions mandatory for anyone who facilitates the Assad regime’s acquisition of goods and services among other actions that support the current regime in Syria.  The U.S. has begun implementing that act, putting additional sanctions on Syria and could add more to Iran as well.  Lebanon will also face a sanction threat from the law. The other important characteristic of the Caesar Act is that it applies sanction pressure directly on Syrian Alawites, the base of Assad’s support.
  • We are monitoring reports of elevated levels of radioactive particles in Northern Europe.  The current levels are not a health risk but the inability to pinpoint the source is a worry.  There are concerns that the elevated levels may signal a problem due to a Russian nuclear power facility, Russia claims that no problems exist.

View the complete PDF

[1] https://xospata.com/, https://ascopubs.org/doi/abs/10.1200/JCO.2019.37.15_suppl.5537, https://www.prnewswire.com/news-releases/senhwa-biosciences-silmitasertib-named-as-potential-covid-19-therapy-301032362.html

Daily Comment (June 26, 2020)

by Bill O’Grady, Thomas Wash, and Patrick Fearon-Hernandez, CFA

[Posted: 9:30 AM EDT]

The 13th episode of the Confluence of Ideas podcast is available; it is our first in a series of episodes on the November elections.  Additionally, there is something new!  As usual, we have a new Asset Allocation Weekly in today’s report (which we also post as standalone report), but we are adding two new features to this report: an associated podcast and an automated chartbook!  Check them out!

Good morning and happy Friday!  Equity futures are mostly marking time this morning.  Personal income and spending are out today; we detail the numbers below.  In the economics section, we look at the drop in global trade and the problem of college sports.  There was news on banking policy; we go over the details below, but, in short, “the Fed giveth and the Fed taketh away.”  China had something akin to a bank run.  We update the pandemic, including the “Duff’s map.”  We also take a look at tech.  Here are the details:

Economic news:

Policy news:

China news:

  • Chinese households, like their counterparts in Japan, Europe and the U.S., have been in search of yield for their savings. In China, trust companies have emerged to satisfy this demand.  The industry holds CNY 21.0 trillion ($3 trillion); it is estimated that around CNY 625 billion of these assets are distressed.  However, financial institutions that are sound can face liquidity problems if depositors demand liquidity simultaneously.  Small scale protests have broken out in Chengdu, Sichuan, after Sichuan Trust told investors that it would “struggle to make principal and interest payments” on about CNY 13 billion of assets.  China’s debt growth has been of concern for some time.  It has been noted that Chinese policy support from the pandemic has been modest compared to what we saw after the Financial Crisis, leading to concerns about China’s debt capacity.  This situation bears watching; if Chinese investors begin to fear the stability of the financial system, we could see purchases of bitcoin, gold and capital flight.

COVID-19:  The number of reported cases is 9,632,969 with 489,854 deaths and 4,859,744 recoveries.  In the U.S., there are 2,422,312 confirmed cases with 124,415 deaths and 663,562 recoveries.  For those who like to keep score at home, the FT has created a nifty interactive chart that allows one to compare cases across nations using similar scaling metrics.  Additionally, one way of monitoring reopening is by the number of beer taps operated relative to capacity, or as we like to call it, the “Duff’s map.”

Virology:

Technology news:

Foreign news:

View the complete PDF

Asset Allocation Weekly (June 26, 2020)

by Asset Allocation Committee

(N.B.  Due to the Independence Day holiday, the next report will be issued on July 10, 2020.)

Since 2008, some central banks have implemented negative policy interest rates.  Standard economics suggests that negative nominal rates on deposits are impossible because holders could simply liquidate the deposit and “put the money under the mattress.”  We have observed that there are costs to holding cash in large amounts, so banks can implement a negative rate (perhaps best thought of as a fee) on holding cash.  Although there are limits to how low negative rates can go (at some point, the cost of providing safekeeping exceeds the benefits), we note the Swiss National Bank has had a policy rate of -0.75% since December 2014.

Why would a central bank consider implementing a negative policy rate?  If economic conditions warranted easing and inflation was low,[1] it may be impossible to use low but positive interest rates as a policy tool.  In that case, negative interest rates or some other unconventional monetary policy may be necessary.

Are conditions similar in the U.S.?  Our analysis of the policy rate, using the Mankiw Rule, a variation on the Taylor Rule, suggests that the FOMC could consider negative policy rates.  The Taylor Rule is designed to calculate the neutral policy rate given core inflation and the measure of slack in the economy.  John Taylor measured slack using the difference between actual GDP and potential GDP.  The Taylor Rule assumes that the Fed should have an inflation target in its policy and should try to generate enough economic activity to maintain an economy near full utilization.  The rule will generate an estimate of the neutral policy rate; in theory, if the current fed funds target is below the calculated rate, the central bank should raise rates.  Greg Mankiw, a former chair of the Council of Economic Advisors in the Bush White House and current Harvard professor, developed a similar measure that substitutes the unemployment rate for the difficult-to-observe potential GDP measure.  We have taken the original Mankiw Rule and created three other variations.  Specifically, our models use core CPI and either the unemployment rate, the employment/population ratio, involuntary part-time employment or yearly wage growth for non-supervisory workers.  In this report, we are not using the wage growth variation because it is yielding a sharply positive policy rate; wages have increased because lower paid workers have been laid off in greater numbers than higher paid workers.

As the recession developed, the unemployment rate jumped, the employment/population ratio fell, and the number of involuntary part-time workers rose.  Complicating matters further, inflation declined.  All these factors pointed to the need for policy stimulus.  In fact, in the worst case, the employment/ population ratio variation, the nominal rate should be as low as -5.65%.

In 2008 through most of 2011, these variations of the Mankiw Rule suggested the policy rate should have been below zero.  That is the case today.  So far, the FOMC has rejected a negative policy rate and instead relies on expanding the balance sheet and forward guidance.  The current program of balance sheet expansion is historically unique; for the first time, we are seeing the Fed buy an assortment of financial assets that expose it to credit risk.  These include corporate and high yield bonds.  As we noted last week, the current QE is reducing credit spreads, but, like forward guidance, the actual stimulative impact is uncertain.

So, why is the FOMC opposed to negative interest rates?  The most likely reason is the structure of the U.S. financial system.  The U.S. system has an extensive non-bank financial system; unlike banks, this system isn’t funded by deposits but by repo and money markets.  The non-bank financial system, also known as the “shadow banking system,” finances large swaths of the U.S. economy.  Although it is difficult to estimate the size, there are reports it may be as large as $1.2 trillion.  The fear is that negative deposit rates would likely cause the money market funds to “break the buck” to account for the below-zero yield.  That could lead to difficult-to-determine outcomes, but it is plausible that the non-bank financial system may find itself without a source of funding.  Since there is no Fed backstop to the non-bank financial system, there could be a run on the loan providers.  Other nations have much smaller non-bank systems and thus can manage negative policy rates.  The U.S. probably can’t.

And so, additional policy stimulus, if necessary, will come from further expansion of the balance sheet and forward guidance.  Another possibility would be yield curve control, which was implemented during WWII into the early 1950s.  In this policy, the Fed will set the desired rate of some or all of the Treasury curve, absorbing all the Treasury borrowing that the market won’t buy, thus fixing the interest rate.  The Bank of Japan and Reserve Bank of Australia are currently running such policies.  Although the FOMC hasn’t taken this step yet, it is being considered by Fed policymakers.  The conclusion—monetary policy will likely remain historically accommodative well into 2021.

View the PDF


[1] For example, Switzerland’s May CPI was -1.3% from last year.

Business Cycle Report (June 25, 2020)

by Thomas Wash

The business cycle has a major impact on financial markets; recessions usually accompany bear markets in equities.  The intention of this report is to keep our readers apprised of the potential for recession, updated on a monthly basis.  Although it isn’t the final word on our views about recession, it is part of our process in signaling the potential for a downturn.

In May, the diffusion index fell deeper into recession territory as improvements in several indicators could not outweigh the negative impact of the previous two months. Last month, states started reopening their economies which resulted in a rise in economic conditions. The financial market continued to show signs of improvement as the Federal Reserve offered reassurances that it would continue to intervene in markets when needed. Additionally, increased economic activity led to a sharp rise in equities. Meanwhile, a reduction in lockdown restrictions allowed firms to hire workers in record numbers. However, the impact of the pandemic continued to weigh heavily on both investor and consumer confidence as concerns persist surrounding economic outlook. As a result, six out of the 11 indicators are in contraction territory. The reading for this month fell to -0.152 from +0.030 in April, well below the recession signal of +0.250.

The chart above shows the Confluence Diffusion Index. It uses a three-month moving average of 11 leading indicators to track the state of the business cycle. The red line signals when the business cycle is headed toward a contraction, while the blue line signals when the business cycle is headed toward a recovery. On average, the diffusion index is currently providing about six months of lead time for a contraction and five months of lead time for a recovery. Continue reading for a more in-depth understanding of how the indicators are performing and refer to our Glossary of Charts at the back of this report for a description of each chart and what it measures. A chart title listed in red indicates that indicator is signaling recession.

View the complete PDF

Daily Comment (June 25, 2020)

by Bill O’Grady, Thomas Wash, and Patrick Fearon-Hernandez, CFA

[Posted: 9:30 AM EDT]

The 13th episode of the Confluence of Ideas podcast is available; it is our first in a series of reports on the November elections.

Good morning, all.  Lots going on today.  For the second consecutive day, we are starting with weaker equity markets.  In fact, almost everything is red this morning except Treasuries.  In equities, there are worries that institutional managers may try to capture Q2’s surge in equities with an aggressive rebalance and that would be bearish for stocks in the very short run.  We update the pandemic news; it appears another surge in cases is upon us, although we are noting some differences compared to the initial rise.  We update China news this morning, noting a real cold war is emerging on the India/China frontier and there is some divergence in policy direction between the White House and Congress.  The economic news includes the IMF’s downgrade of global GDP.  Poland is open to U.S. troops.  We are noting some flooding issues and there was an earthquake yesterday in Mexico; we also follow up on the arctic heatwave.  The Weekly Energy Update is available.  Here are the details:

COVID-19: The number of reported cases is 9,440,535 with 483,207 deaths and 4,754,755 recoveries.  In the U.S., there are 2,381,369 confirmed cases with 121,979 deaths and 656,161 recoveries.  For those who like to keep score at home, the FT has created a nifty interactive chart that allows one to compare cases across nations using similar scaling metrics.  The Axios U.S. state map has been updated.

Virology:

  • The WSJ details the rise in new cases; although increased testing is a factor, it does look like we are seeing increased spreading.
  • One factor we are seeing is fewer deaths per the number of cases.
(Sources: Johns Hopkins, CIM)

This chart looks at the rolling seven-day change in new cases and fatalities.  We are seeing a clear upswing in cases, but fatalities are continuing to decline.  It is possible that there is a lag between cases and fatalities.  In fact, the above chart suggests there is about a 10-day lag, so some increase in fatalities wouldn’t be a surprise.  But, at the same time, we are well into that 10-day window and, so far, fatalities haven’t jumped yet.  We suspect two changes have occurred that may slow the rate of deaths; first, the medical system has probably gotten better at treatment.  We know ventilator use has slowed as less invasive techniques have proven to be more effective.  Second, it is probably the case that vulnerable populations (the elderly, chronic conditions, etc.) are being more careful in public and those contracting the disease are younger and healthier.  That doesn’t mean this group can’t die from the disease, but the chances are lower.

  • Therefore, we may be seeing a slow transition from avoiding the disease at all costs to learning to live with it. It is apparent that lockdowns do work in slowing the rate of infections, but the economic cost is horrific.  Being more selective in who stays home, taking other measures (distancing in social situations, mask wearing) and working on mitigation therapies are all probably in our future until widespread vaccination develops.
  • Disney (DIS, 112.07) may be forced to delay reopening its theme parks as workers push back against the company’s plans. Other companies and industries are facing similar concerns.  Several states are reconsidering their plans to reopen as well.
  • India is facing a massive problem in its medical system due to the pandemic.
  • Genetic researchers in the U.K. have identified 68 genes associated with the risks surrounding COVID-19. One of the mysteries of the virus is the wide variation in symptoms.  Some people who are infected exhibit no symptoms, while others are seriously affected.  Their research suggests that COVID-19 is not just a respiratory illness but a cardiovascular one as well.  It has also been found that Type A blood groups are at higher risk of serious complications, while Type O groups are not.  If specific markers can be determined, genetic testing could indicate who is vulnerable and who is not and thus allow low-risk groups to reengage in social and economic activities (which could have much less attractive aspects as well).

China news: 

  • As the powers between Congress and the executive branch have evolved over time, the president generally has a greater say in foreign policy. That doesn’t mean Congress has no impact, but, in the day-to-day operation of foreign policy, the White House is in charge.  Still, for better or worse, Congress reflects the broader populous and thus has exhibited swings in sentiment over various policy issues.  Accordingly, in terms of foreign policy, Congress can push for sanctions and other policy measures that the president may be reluctant to implement as they might undermine other policy goals.  This is a situation that has been part of American political history since Washington (our first president had to fend off congressional desires to join France against England in French Revolutionary Wars).
    • Currently, Congress is pushing for numerous measures to punish China over various issues. Regarding Hong Kong, the White House is trying to prevent Congress from passing mandatory sanctions.
    • Congress is pressing to ease restrictions that would allow Americans to sue China over pandemic costs.
    • There are divisions within the executive branch as well. The Pentagon has published a list of 20 Chinese companies with ties to the Chinese military; it is presumed this list was created to reduce these companies’ ability to tap U.S. financial markets and perhaps sanction trade.  The Senate is pushing for greater transparency for foreign firms listing on U.S. exchanges.  It appears the goal of the bill is to force Chinese firms to give up their ties to the security state for access to U.S. financial markets.  National Security Advisor O’Brien recently gave a speech that was sharply critical of the CPC.
    • It is often the case that a president doesn’t necessarily oppose measures brought by Congress or other members of the executive branch; what presidents oppose are measures that restrict their ability to enjoy policy flexibility.
  • Although direct hostilities appear to have eased in the India/China frontier, it does appear both sides are digging in for potential future conflicts. India has blocked the importation of various Chinese goods in retaliation for the recent attacks.
  • There are increasing worries about military conflicts between China and the U.S.

Trade policy news:

Foreign news:

Economic news:

Weather news:

View the complete PDF