Author: Rebekah Stovall
Asset Allocation Weekly (June 26, 2020)
by Asset Allocation Committee
(N.B. Due to the Independence Day holiday, the next report will be issued on July 10, 2020.)
Since 2008, some central banks have implemented negative policy interest rates. Standard economics suggests that negative nominal rates on deposits are impossible because holders could simply liquidate the deposit and “put the money under the mattress.” We have observed that there are costs to holding cash in large amounts, so banks can implement a negative rate (perhaps best thought of as a fee) on holding cash. Although there are limits to how low negative rates can go (at some point, the cost of providing safekeeping exceeds the benefits), we note the Swiss National Bank has had a policy rate of -0.75% since December 2014.
Why would a central bank consider implementing a negative policy rate? If economic conditions warranted easing and inflation was low,[1] it may be impossible to use low but positive interest rates as a policy tool. In that case, negative interest rates or some other unconventional monetary policy may be necessary.
Are conditions similar in the U.S.? Our analysis of the policy rate, using the Mankiw Rule, a variation on the Taylor Rule, suggests that the FOMC could consider negative policy rates. The Taylor Rule is designed to calculate the neutral policy rate given core inflation and the measure of slack in the economy. John Taylor measured slack using the difference between actual GDP and potential GDP. The Taylor Rule assumes that the Fed should have an inflation target in its policy and should try to generate enough economic activity to maintain an economy near full utilization. The rule will generate an estimate of the neutral policy rate; in theory, if the current fed funds target is below the calculated rate, the central bank should raise rates. Greg Mankiw, a former chair of the Council of Economic Advisors in the Bush White House and current Harvard professor, developed a similar measure that substitutes the unemployment rate for the difficult-to-observe potential GDP measure. We have taken the original Mankiw Rule and created three other variations. Specifically, our models use core CPI and either the unemployment rate, the employment/population ratio, involuntary part-time employment or yearly wage growth for non-supervisory workers. In this report, we are not using the wage growth variation because it is yielding a sharply positive policy rate; wages have increased because lower paid workers have been laid off in greater numbers than higher paid workers.
As the recession developed, the unemployment rate jumped, the employment/population ratio fell, and the number of involuntary part-time workers rose. Complicating matters further, inflation declined. All these factors pointed to the need for policy stimulus. In fact, in the worst case, the employment/ population ratio variation, the nominal rate should be as low as -5.65%.
In 2008 through most of 2011, these variations of the Mankiw Rule suggested the policy rate should have been below zero. That is the case today. So far, the FOMC has rejected a negative policy rate and instead relies on expanding the balance sheet and forward guidance. The current program of balance sheet expansion is historically unique; for the first time, we are seeing the Fed buy an assortment of financial assets that expose it to credit risk. These include corporate and high yield bonds. As we noted last week, the current QE is reducing credit spreads, but, like forward guidance, the actual stimulative impact is uncertain.
So, why is the FOMC opposed to negative interest rates? The most likely reason is the structure of the U.S. financial system. The U.S. system has an extensive non-bank financial system; unlike banks, this system isn’t funded by deposits but by repo and money markets. The non-bank financial system, also known as the “shadow banking system,” finances large swaths of the U.S. economy. Although it is difficult to estimate the size, there are reports it may be as large as $1.2 trillion. The fear is that negative deposit rates would likely cause the money market funds to “break the buck” to account for the below-zero yield. That could lead to difficult-to-determine outcomes, but it is plausible that the non-bank financial system may find itself without a source of funding. Since there is no Fed backstop to the non-bank financial system, there could be a run on the loan providers. Other nations have much smaller non-bank systems and thus can manage negative policy rates. The U.S. probably can’t.
And so, additional policy stimulus, if necessary, will come from further expansion of the balance sheet and forward guidance. Another possibility would be yield curve control, which was implemented during WWII into the early 1950s. In this policy, the Fed will set the desired rate of some or all of the Treasury curve, absorbing all the Treasury borrowing that the market won’t buy, thus fixing the interest rate. The Bank of Japan and Reserve Bank of Australia are currently running such policies. Although the FOMC hasn’t taken this step yet, it is being considered by Fed policymakers. The conclusion—monetary policy will likely remain historically accommodative well into 2021.
[1] For example, Switzerland’s May CPI was -1.3% from last year.
Business Cycle Report (June 25, 2020)
by Thomas Wash
The business cycle has a major impact on financial markets; recessions usually accompany bear markets in equities. The intention of this report is to keep our readers apprised of the potential for recession, updated on a monthly basis. Although it isn’t the final word on our views about recession, it is part of our process in signaling the potential for a downturn.
In May, the diffusion index fell deeper into recession territory as improvements in several indicators could not outweigh the negative impact of the previous two months. Last month, states started reopening their economies which resulted in a rise in economic conditions. The financial market continued to show signs of improvement as the Federal Reserve offered reassurances that it would continue to intervene in markets when needed. Additionally, increased economic activity led to a sharp rise in equities. Meanwhile, a reduction in lockdown restrictions allowed firms to hire workers in record numbers. However, the impact of the pandemic continued to weigh heavily on both investor and consumer confidence as concerns persist surrounding economic outlook. As a result, six out of the 11 indicators are in contraction territory. The reading for this month fell to -0.152 from +0.030 in April, well below the recession signal of +0.250.
The chart above shows the Confluence Diffusion Index. It uses a three-month moving average of 11 leading indicators to track the state of the business cycle. The red line signals when the business cycle is headed toward a contraction, while the blue line signals when the business cycle is headed toward a recovery. On average, the diffusion index is currently providing about six months of lead time for a contraction and five months of lead time for a recovery. Continue reading for a more in-depth understanding of how the indicators are performing and refer to our Glossary of Charts at the back of this report for a description of each chart and what it measures. A chart title listed in red indicates that indicator is signaling recession.
Daily Comment (June 25, 2020)
by Bill O’Grady, Thomas Wash, and Patrick Fearon-Hernandez, CFA
[Posted: 9:30 AM EDT]
The 13th episode of the Confluence of Ideas podcast is available; it is our first in a series of reports on the November elections.
Good morning, all. Lots going on today. For the second consecutive day, we are starting with weaker equity markets. In fact, almost everything is red this morning except Treasuries. In equities, there are worries that institutional managers may try to capture Q2’s surge in equities with an aggressive rebalance and that would be bearish for stocks in the very short run. We update the pandemic news; it appears another surge in cases is upon us, although we are noting some differences compared to the initial rise. We update China news this morning, noting a real cold war is emerging on the India/China frontier and there is some divergence in policy direction between the White House and Congress. The economic news includes the IMF’s downgrade of global GDP. Poland is open to U.S. troops. We are noting some flooding issues and there was an earthquake yesterday in Mexico; we also follow up on the arctic heatwave. The Weekly Energy Update is available. Here are the details:
COVID-19: The number of reported cases is 9,440,535 with 483,207 deaths and 4,754,755 recoveries. In the U.S., there are 2,381,369 confirmed cases with 121,979 deaths and 656,161 recoveries. For those who like to keep score at home, the FT has created a nifty interactive chart that allows one to compare cases across nations using similar scaling metrics. The Axios U.S. state map has been updated.
Virology:
- The WSJ details the rise in new cases; although increased testing is a factor, it does look like we are seeing increased spreading.
- One factor we are seeing is fewer deaths per the number of cases.

This chart looks at the rolling seven-day change in new cases and fatalities. We are seeing a clear upswing in cases, but fatalities are continuing to decline. It is possible that there is a lag between cases and fatalities. In fact, the above chart suggests there is about a 10-day lag, so some increase in fatalities wouldn’t be a surprise. But, at the same time, we are well into that 10-day window and, so far, fatalities haven’t jumped yet. We suspect two changes have occurred that may slow the rate of deaths; first, the medical system has probably gotten better at treatment. We know ventilator use has slowed as less invasive techniques have proven to be more effective. Second, it is probably the case that vulnerable populations (the elderly, chronic conditions, etc.) are being more careful in public and those contracting the disease are younger and healthier. That doesn’t mean this group can’t die from the disease, but the chances are lower.
- Therefore, we may be seeing a slow transition from avoiding the disease at all costs to learning to live with it. It is apparent that lockdowns do work in slowing the rate of infections, but the economic cost is horrific. Being more selective in who stays home, taking other measures (distancing in social situations, mask wearing) and working on mitigation therapies are all probably in our future until widespread vaccination develops.
- Disney (DIS, 112.07) may be forced to delay reopening its theme parks as workers push back against the company’s plans. Other companies and industries are facing similar concerns. Several states are reconsidering their plans to reopen as well.
- India is facing a massive problem in its medical system due to the pandemic.
- Genetic researchers in the U.K. have identified 68 genes associated with the risks surrounding COVID-19. One of the mysteries of the virus is the wide variation in symptoms. Some people who are infected exhibit no symptoms, while others are seriously affected. Their research suggests that COVID-19 is not just a respiratory illness but a cardiovascular one as well. It has also been found that Type A blood groups are at higher risk of serious complications, while Type O groups are not. If specific markers can be determined, genetic testing could indicate who is vulnerable and who is not and thus allow low-risk groups to reengage in social and economic activities (which could have much less attractive aspects as well).
China news:
- As the powers between Congress and the executive branch have evolved over time, the president generally has a greater say in foreign policy. That doesn’t mean Congress has no impact, but, in the day-to-day operation of foreign policy, the White House is in charge. Still, for better or worse, Congress reflects the broader populous and thus has exhibited swings in sentiment over various policy issues. Accordingly, in terms of foreign policy, Congress can push for sanctions and other policy measures that the president may be reluctant to implement as they might undermine other policy goals. This is a situation that has been part of American political history since Washington (our first president had to fend off congressional desires to join France against England in French Revolutionary Wars).
- Currently, Congress is pushing for numerous measures to punish China over various issues. Regarding Hong Kong, the White House is trying to prevent Congress from passing mandatory sanctions.
- Congress is pressing to ease restrictions that would allow Americans to sue China over pandemic costs.
- There are divisions within the executive branch as well. The Pentagon has published a list of 20 Chinese companies with ties to the Chinese military; it is presumed this list was created to reduce these companies’ ability to tap U.S. financial markets and perhaps sanction trade. The Senate is pushing for greater transparency for foreign firms listing on U.S. exchanges. It appears the goal of the bill is to force Chinese firms to give up their ties to the security state for access to U.S. financial markets. National Security Advisor O’Brien recently gave a speech that was sharply critical of the CPC.
- It is often the case that a president doesn’t necessarily oppose measures brought by Congress or other members of the executive branch; what presidents oppose are measures that restrict their ability to enjoy policy flexibility.
- Although direct hostilities appear to have eased in the India/China frontier, it does appear both sides are digging in for potential future conflicts. India has blocked the importation of various Chinese goods in retaliation for the recent attacks.
- There are increasing worries about military conflicts between China and the U.S.
Trade policy news:
- If you are a fan of European wines, get busy; there is a possible jump in tariffs on EU wine coming due to the ongoing dispute over EU aircraft subsidies. Other European “goodies” might be targeted as well.
- It looks like the structure of a grand bargain over Brexit is in the works. The U.K. would be allowed to make changes to its policy that may lead to an “uneven” playing field with the EU. In other words, if the U.K. relaxes its environmental laws, the EU could be at a disadvantage in trade. The EU will be given the right to selectively apply tariffs on U.K. goods to offset Britain’s advantage. The strategic ambiguity of this proposal is rather impressive; both sides can claim they got what they wanted, and a hard Brexit can be avoided. How it would actually work in practice is another matter, but this looks like a rather elegant solution.
- The U.K. is beginning to realize that a trade deal with the U.S. may require it to simply adopt U.S. regulatory policy.
Foreign news:
- Poland could receive American soldiers who are likely to be removed from Germany, assuming Poland is willing to pay for billeting U.S. troops. Poland does want the U.S. presence to remain in Europe; given Poland’s history, this is a very reasonable request.
- Russia held its May parade yesterday; the country goes to the polls today on a referendum to extend Putin’s rule.
- Mexico suffered a massive earthquake yesterday but, so far, fatalities have been remarkably light. Mexico’s unions oppose the decision by the government to nationalize lithium mines.
Economic news:
- The IMF downgraded its economic outlook, indicating the world economy will shrink 4.9% this year compared to its earlier estimate of -3.0%. The pandemic was blamed.
- One of our concerns about the economy is that state and local governments, facing falling tax revenues and pandemic costs, will be forced to curtail services and lay off workers. There are reports that New York is facing this problem.
- The Fed is conducting bank stress tests. Governor Quarles is suggesting banks test for a second downturn in the economy.
- Yelp reports that 140K businesses remain closed due to the pandemic; around 40% of those firms may not reopen.
- Congressional leaders are criticizing the Fed for relying on the three major rating agencies in their purchases of corporate debt. If the Fed widens its buying beyond this group, the central bank may be accepting more credit risk.
- We have been monitoring the financial markets for evidence of election worries. One of the issues that is evolving is that the widespread use of absentee ballots, due to COVID-19, will delay reporting results and thus it is very possible that we may not know for certain who won on the day after the election. That will include congressional races as well. We are seeing a rise in JPY call option purchases for November as traders speculate that the yen would rally if uncertainty over the election were to develop.
- On a lighter note, MLB will allow mascots to return when the baseball season resumes. Fredbird has avoided a layoff.
Weather news:
- Massive, widespread flooding is being reported in China. Although this is a period of seasonal rain, this year, rain has been much greater than normal. The Chinese party organ, the Global Times, reports that the Three Gorges Dam is ok…which, of course, begs the question: why did the CPC need to tell us that? We are also seeing flooding in Ukraine.
- Yesterday, we reported on the arctic heat wave; it appears that the higher than normal temperatures could trigger widespread fires.
Weekly Energy Update (June 25, 2020)
by Bill O’Grady, Thomas Wash, and Patrick Fearon-Hernandez, CFA
(NB: Due to the upcoming Independence Day holiday, the next report will be published on July 9.)
Here is an updated crude oil price chart. The oil market has stabilized at higher levels after April’s historic collapse.

Crude oil inventories rose less than market expectations, with stockpiles rising 1.4 mb compared to forecasts of a +2.0 mb build. The SPR added 2.0 mb this week.
In the details, U.S. crude oil production rose 0.5 mbpd to 11.0 mbpd. Exports rose 0.7 mbpd, while imports fell 0.1 mbpd. Refining activity rose 0.8%, modestly higher than expected. After major declines for the past several weeks, the level of unaccounted-for crude oil recovered sharply this week.
Unaccounted-for crude oil is a balancing item in the weekly energy balance sheet. To make the data balance, this line item is a plug figure, but that doesn’t mean it doesn’t matter. This week’s number is -53 kbpd. This is a very small number and suggests the DOE is getting the data fixed. The rise in production suggests that the unaccounted-for crude oil data was being affected more by crude oil stored in areas unreported, although falling output addressed some of this figure as well.
We have been seeing oil flow into the Strategic Petroleum Reserve (SPR) in recent weeks. The government is offering storage in the SPR to relieve inventory constraints. The chart below shows the history of the level of inventory in the SPR by party holding the White House.
Although President Carter was an exception, in general, Republicans have tended to build the SPR, while Democrats have held it mostly steady. This may be due, in part, to the fact that the GOP tends to favor the energy industry. President Trump has not followed that pattern until recently. We do expect these injections to be temporary as the rise is due to aiding the industry and not a deliberate policy to increase the stockpile. But, since mid-April, 18.8 mb have gone into the SPR, easing bearish price pressures.

The above chart shows the annual seasonal pattern for crude oil inventories. This week’s data showed another modest rise in crude oil stockpiles. We are in the beginning of the seasonal draw for crude oil. The continued rise in inventories is bearish for prices.
Based on our oil inventory/price model, fair value is $26.85; using the euro/price model, fair value is $52.56. The combined model, a broader analysis of the oil price, generates a fair value of $39.99. We are starting to see a wide divergence between the EUR and oil inventory models. The weakness we are seeing in the dollar, which we believe may have “legs,” is bullish for crude oil and may overcome the bearish oil inventory overhang.
Gasoline consumption remains below average, but the recovery is unmistakable.

Still, the refining industry is continuing to struggle, and without improvement in this sector the demand for crude oil could stall in the coming weeks.
Daily Comment (June 24, 2020)
by Bill O’Grady, Thomas Wash, and Patrick Fearon-Hernandez, CFA
[Posted: 9:30 AM EDT]
Good morning! The 13th episode of the Confluence of Ideas podcast is available; the topic is the first in a series of episodes on the November elections.
Equity futures are lower this morning; market talk suggests it’s due to rising COVID-19 infections, but a good, old-fashioned “pause to refresh” is just as likely. Poland’s President Duda visits the White House today just before elections in his country. The Segway is done. We update the news from China. We offer some thoughts on reports that the administration is considering additional stimulus and other measures. There is growing concern about commercial real estate. Tech leaders are opposed to immigration restriction measures. Our usual commentary on COVID-19 is available. Here are the details:
China news:
- It appears that India and China are reducing recent border tensions. This is the usual pattern; we have seen a cycle of rising tensions followed by steps to prevent a broader war. The risk is, of course, that the border tensions, at some juncture, do lead to something worse. One area of concern is that PM Modi has less ability to control public opinion in India, compared to Chairman Xi; it is not inconceivable that an Indian PM at some point in the future may not be able to contain the groundswell and may be forced into a conflict. In an upcoming WGR, we will look at the history of this issue.
- For the past few days, we have been commenting on the recent EU/China videoconference. In the aftermath, it is clear that EU leaders are unhappy with China’s behavior, but are also reluctant to press too hard on Beijing for fear of hurting trade and investment relations. The recent row over comments from Peter Navarro suggests similar sentiment exists in the U.S. as well. The closest historical parallel, in our view, to China’s relations with the U.S., or the EU too, was between the U.K. and Germany from 1870 to 1914. There was a growing geopolitical rivalry, but deep economic ties as well.
Economic and policy news:
- June and the end of Q2 are coming soon, and several stimulus measures are about to expire. The measures were put in place with fairly short endpoints because the expectations were that the economy would be returning to normal in short order. It is true that there is ample evidence of the economy improving, but making new peaks in GDP will probably take until H2 2021. As it becomes apparent that that a new expansion is going to take a while, policymakers are rethinking their ideas on allowing various measures to expire next month.
- The first round of stimulus checks worked pretty well; renters were remarkably current on making payments and spending levels have shown signs of recovery. The president is apparently on board with another round of stimulus checks. Although there will be opposition, we would not be surprised to see a second round soon.
- The tax deadline may be extended again, past July 15th.
- President Trump would also like an infrastructure bill, to the tune of $1.0 trillion, but he doesn’t appear to be getting much support from either Congress or the rest of his administration.
- There are growing concerns about commercial real estate; policymakers are pushing for a new Fed facility to support this market. There are reports that some mall operators are pressing small retailers for rent payments for months when the malls were closed. This problem highlights the problems in the payment chain; as commercial rents don’t get paid, cash shortages develop to operators and eventually bondholders.
- Overall, we do expect new measures to be forthcoming. However, as is normal with policymaking, look for there to be much “11th hour” type brinkmanship before anything gets passed.
- The U.S. is contemplating $3.1 billion of new tariffs on the EU and U.K. if they proceed with a digital tax. Canada is facing new tariffs on aluminum as Washington tries to cope with rising supplies. This move is coming just before USMCA goes into effect on July 1. Congress is planning a vote on leaving the WTO next month. The measure appears to be jointing led by right- and left-wing populists in Congress.
- There has been a run on plexiglass as shields for COVID-19.
Foreign news:
- The EU is considering banning U.S. travelers from the bloc due to concerns about COVID-19. Interestingly enough, the ban would not exclude China.
- North Korea has engaged in a number of provocative acts recently. It appears that Kim Jong Un may be dialing back some of the tensions. To some extent, what we have seen recently is consistent with North Korea’s behavior. Pyongyang often takes aggressive actions and raises tensions, then promises to behave better if it gets sanctions relief, or aid. What might be different this time is that this news may signal a reengagement of Kim Jong Un; there has been some evidence to suggest he has been sidelined and his sister, Kim Yo Jong, has been driving policy. She appears to be much more hawkish than her brother. Knowing what is happening in North Korea is always a challenge, but it is possible we are seeing a divided leadership.
- Russia is holding its military parades today that it usually holds on May 9. These parades were delayed due to the pandemic. Tomorrow, Russians vote to extend Putin’s rule; we expect him to win.
- British landlords and tenants are facing an end to support, reflecting similar worries in the U.S.
Tech news:
- The S. has suspended work visas for several classes of workers due to high unemployment. The tech industry is upset by the decision as is India.
- The DOJ and states’ attorneys general are meeting to discuss antitrust action against some tech firms.
COVID-19: The number of reported cases is 9,273,773 with 478,160 deaths and 4,645,628 recoveries. In the U.S., there are 2,347,102 confirmed cases with 121,225 deaths and 647,548 recoveries. For those who like to keep score at home, the FT has created a nifty interactive chart that allows one to compare cases across nations using similar scaling metrics.
Virology:
- As lockdowns ease, there has been a rise in infections, not only in the U.S., but around the world. South America has been especially hard hit. Nursing homes have been a particular area of risk, and Canada has been hit hard.
- There are reports some Chinese nationals in Russia are using forged COVID-19 tests showing a negative result so they can return to China.
Finally, there are reports of soaring temperatures in Siberia. Although it hasn’t been verified, the city of Verkhoyansk reported a high temperature of just 100o Fahrenheit on Saturday. The Russian Arctic is also seeing higher temperatures, with temperatures rising about 0.69o every decade, compared to world temperatures rising about 0.18o every decade. The rise in temperatures is thawing permafrost and contributed to a recent diesel fuel spill, as weakening permafrost damaged a storage tank. One way this change affects U.S. weather is that it weakens the jet stream and can leave weather systems “parked” over parts of the U.S., leading to extended heat waves, or rainfall and flooding.
Daily Comment (June 23, 2020)
by Bill O’Grady, Thomas Wash, and Patrick Fearon-Hernandez, CFA
[Posted: 9:30 AM EDT]
Good morning! The 13th episode of the Confluence of Ideas podcast is available; the topic is the first in a series of episodes on the November elections. U.S. equity futures are higher again this morning, with the rest of the world rising as well. In other markets, gold is at a seven-month high, WTI is over $40 per barrel and the dollar is lower. We did see some volatility overnight after Peter Navarro seemed to indicate that the trade agreement with China is “over.” S&P futures quickly dropped about 50 points. The White House moved in short order to clarify Navarro’s comments, confirming that the Phase One arrangement is still intact. We update China and economic news. We also cover domestic policy and foreign news. Our usual commentary on COVID-19 is available. Here are the details:
China news:
- As we noted yesterday, the EU and China held a video meeting. Overall, it appears that both sides remain deeply divided; evidence of this division is the fact that no joint statement was released. EU leaders pressed Beijing to treat European firms in China fairly. Relations with China and the EU have been strained lately. China has been accused of pressing officials to soften language criticizing Beijing’s handling of the pandemic and there are fears China is using its financial power to divide the EU. EU Commission President von der Leyen criticized China for launching cyberattacks on European hospitals. Overall, China is facing diplomatic pressure from Europe and the U.S.
- Beijing has revealed much of the new Hong Kong security law, but not all parts. The rest will be made public after it officially passes the Chinese legislature, which is expected on June 30.
- Fan Xinghai, a vice-chair of the China Securities Regulatory Commission, warned China’s leaders that it should be prepared to be cut off from the U.S. dollar system in a fashion similar to what occurred to Russia. Given China’s massive foreign reserves, such an action by the U.S. would have a significant impact on global financial markets. Although the usual fear is that China would “dump” its Treasuries, such action would harm China more than others. Instead, China would probably try to slowly reduce its Treasury holdings by funneling the sales through intermediaries and try to replace the Treasuries with other foreign bonds, e.g., European and Japanese. A proposed Eurobond for funding the COVID-19 recovery in Europe could be a very attractive replacement for some of the Treasuries held by China.
- Meanwhile, China is seeing a jump in inflows as foreigners are buying Chinese sovereigns, likely to take advantage of their relatively higher yield.
- As we noted last week, the meeting between SoS Pompeo and Yang Jiechi didn’t seem to yield any immediate results. However, it appears one message did emerge; China has agreed to increase the pace of its grain purchases. The current pace is woefully below target. Corn and soybean prices are lower this morning despite this news, although yesterday’s rain across Iowa, Illinois and Missouri probably had more to do with the decline in prices.
Economic news:
- The WSJ notes that there has been a surge in household savings in the U.S. Much of this jump was due to the influx of fiscal support coupled with the lockdown that reduced spending. If the savings persists, it will have an impact on economic growth. However, it is quite possible that as the lockdowns ease, spending will accelerate, and the level of savings will decline. What is unknown is if there will be higher levels of savings in the aftermath of the pandemic. If there is, government dissaving, business dissaving or a smaller trade deficit will result. Our expectation, if the change is permanent, is that the fiscal deficit will absorb most of the savings.
Policy news:
- President Trump clarified reports suggesting he was considering talking to Venezuelan President Maduro. The U.S. will only talk to Maduro about leaving office.
- The U.S., as expected, has restricted work visas; the tech industry opposes this move.
- New York state is nearing the end of its moratorium on evictions; there are worries about widespread evictions, although the mechanics of actually moving people out of apartments will probably prevent immediate actions.
Foreign news:
- Japan has given six weeks for the U.K. to make a trade agreement. The apparent “need for speed” seems to be driven by desires in Japan to be the first to strike a deal with the U.K. out of the EU. It isn’t obvious how much can be accomplished in such a short time frame, but if it can be done, Westminster will be able to claim it has its first trade agreement after Brexit.
- The U.K. is increasing its takeover defenses from foreign buyers. Similar actions have been seen around Europe as the continent adapts to deglobalization.
- EU investors are threatening to reduce investments in Brazil if the country doesn’t address the deforestation of the Amazon region.
COVID-19: The number of reported cases is 9,115,878 with 472,541 deaths and 4,544,196 recoveries. In the U.S., there are 2,312,302 confirmed cases with 120,402 deaths and 640,198 recoveries. For those who like to keep score at home, the FT has created a nifty interactive chart that allows one to compare cases across nations using similar scaling metrics. We are seeing a surge in the R0 data, suggesting a rising pace of infections in the U.S. Here is the state-by-state data.
Virology:
- Saudi Arabia announced it will sharply reduce the number of foreign visitors to the haji, the annual visit to Mecca. Worries about infections prompted the decision.
- Gilead (GILD, 75.67) will begin human testing for an inhaled version of Remdesivir; currently, the drug requires an IV, so going to an inhaled version would allow for greater distribution of the treatment.
Finally, some good news—honeybee populations saw a lower than normal winter die-off this year, after suffering a larger loss last year. Honeybees are critical to numerous U.S. crops, so the recovery is positive.
Confluence of Ideas – #13 “The 2020 Election: Part 1” (Posted 6/23/20)
Weekly Geopolitical Report – The Geopolitics of the 2020 Election: Part V (June 22, 2020)
by Bill O’Grady | PDF
This is the final report in our five-part series on the geopolitics of the 2020 election, which was divided into nine sections. This week, we conclude the report by covering the eighth and ninth sections, the base cases for a Trump or Biden win and market ramifications.