Daily Comment (April 15, 2019)

by Bill O’Grady and Thomas Wash

[Posted: 9:30 AM EDT] Happy Tax Day!  It’s a quiet start to a short week.  Here is what we are watching:

A Chinese anniversary: This is the 30th anniversary of the death of Hu Yaobang, a reformist leader in the late 1980s.  Deng had supported the rise of Hu, who was implementing market reforms, to the chagrin of the traditional communist party elders.  Deng appointed him general secretary in 1982.  In 1987, student unrest led to him being fired from his post in January 1987 and he died two years later.  His death triggered the Tiananmen Square protests in 1989 that threatened the CPC and eventually led to a harsh repression.  Expect the Xi government to attempt to either quash any remembrances of Hu or only allow carefully stage-managed celebrations of this anniversary.

U.S./China trade: Treasury Secretary Mnuchin indicated that the U.S. and China are nearing the final round of concluding issues.[1]  Although Mnuchin avoided discussing details of the negotiations, a few items did emerge.  First, negotiators are apparently considering the possibility that the U.S. could face “repercussions” from not living up to the U.S. side of the bargain.  In other words, if the U.S. fails to meet the terms of the agreement, it is possible that China could implement retaliatory actions, e.g., quotas, tariffs, etc.[2]  We are somewhat surprised the U.S. would accept such a deal, even though it seems fair on the surface.  We note that both Lighthizer and Navarro have argued that China has no right to retaliate with tariffs because the U.S. is simply reacting to earlier Chinse trade impediments.  Thus, this concession, if true, does suggest the U.S. wants an agreement.  Second, there are reports that the U.S. has also given in to China’s industrial subsidies.[3]  China’s subsidies allow it to produce goods at prices below those of foreign competitors, giving it the ability to gain market share.[4]  Third, one of Mnuchin’s aims, reducing the ability of foreign nations to manipulate their currencies to offset the impact of tariffs, is apparently in the agreement.[5]  In theory, this position makes sense; in practice, it’s hard to execute.  We continue to closely watch Lighthizer; he is a trade hawk with clear ideas on how he wants to change the U.S./China trade relationship.  He will not make a deal with China for political expediency.  If the White House pressures him to make an agreement he dislikes, we would not be at all surprised to see him resign.[6]

Finnish elections:  The Finns went to the polls this weekend[7] and, consistent with what we have seen in the rest of Europe, the outcome showed deep divisions within Finnish society.  The center-left, center-right and populist right ended the vote with a near tie.  The center-left Social Democrats won 17.7% of the vote (+1.2% from 2015) and claimed 40 seats out of 200.  That was a six-seat improvement.  The populist right Finns Party won 17.5% of the vote (-0.2% from 2015) and 39 seats, gaining one seat.  The National Coalition Party, a center-right group, took 17.0% of the vote (-1.2% from 2015) and 38 seats, a one-seat improvement.  The Center party, a centrist farm party, took 13.8% of the vote (-7.3% from 2015) at 31 seats.  That was a loss of 18 seats from 2011.  The Greens won 11.5% of the vote (+3.0% from 2015) and 20 seats, a five-seat improvement.  Finally, the Left alliance won 8.2% (+1.1% from 2015) and 16 seats, a four-seat gain.  Various minor parties captured 16 seats.

There is no obvious path to 101 seats because the mainstream parties are uncomfortable with forming a government with the Finns Party.  Keeping the Finns Party out of government forces a “grand coalition” structure, similar to what we’ve seen in Germany.  Such governments tend to be unwieldy.  We expect the process of forming a government to take weeks.  But, the bigger issue remains the rise of populism and the inability of the establishment parties to successfully co-opt the movements around Europe.

More on Asian Swine Fever (ASF): As ASF continues to adversely affect the Chinese pork market, analysts are beginning to calculate the impact.  China is the third largest consumer, per capita, of pork.  However, due to its large population, the impact of China is massive.  ASF is a deadly disease to pigs; once infected, whole herds are quickly lost.  Simply put, there aren’t enough pigs in the rest of the world to offset the losses in Asia.[8]  And, the effects are ongoing.  The current loss of herds is curtailing future supply as farmers in China are reluctant to restart herd building.  The jump in prices will tend to boost production elsewhere, but there is a natural cycle that must be accommodated.

(Source: Barchart)

The ripple effects are starting to show up in the grain markets.  Until herds expand elsewhere, demand for grain will decline, especially soybeans.  Complicating matters is that planting for corn will likely be delayed due to this weekend’s blizzard; the longer corn planting is delayed, the greater the likelihood that acres will shift to soybeans.[9]

Venezuela: The key to the U.S. policy of ousting Maduro is getting the military to turn on the incumbent.  So far, the military has stayed loyal.  Why?  Most likely, Cuban intelligence operatives.[10]

The Fed:There were a number of comments on the Fed over the weekend.  As we noted last week, Herman Cain’s nomination is under pressure.  There is clear establishment opposition to the politicization of the Fed.[11]  The president hammered on the central bank over the weekend.[12]  Starting later today, we will publish the first edition in a new WGR three-part series on the interaction of the Fed on American hegemony.  Essentially, it’s all about the ability of the U.S. to impose at least part of the costs of domestic economic adjustment the world.  Stay tuned…

View the complete PDF


[1] https://www.wsj.com/articles/mnuchin-says-trade-talks-near-final-round-11555188048?mod=hp_lead_pos7

[2] https://www.ft.com/content/9d363b28-5e5c-11e9-b285-3acd5d43599e

[3] https://www.reuters.com/article/us-usa-trade-china-exclusive/exclusive-u-s-waters-down-demand-china-ax-subsidies-in-push-for-trade-deal-sources-idUSKCN1RR02X

[4] https://www.reuters.com/article/us-usa-solar/chinas-solar-subsidy-cuts-erode-the-impact-of-trump-tariffs-idUSKCN1LF18K

[5] https://www.wsj.com/articles/u-s-china-trade-pact-takes-aim-at-currency-manipulation-11555074003

[6] https://www.ft.com/content/532fd236-5cd7-11e9-9dde-7aedca0a081a

[7] https://www.ft.com/content/69b66888-5ef5-11e9-b285-3acd5d43599e?emailId=5cb404a5316b1d0004e6714f&segmentId=22011ee7-896a-8c4c-22a0-7603348b7f22

[8] https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2019-04-11/hog-apocalypse-in-china-leaves-farmers-fortifying-pigsties

[9] https://finance.yahoo.com/news/deadly-pig-disease-reshaping-global-230000341.html

[10] https://www.washingtonpost.com/world/national-security/venezuelas-military-despite-us-expectations-has-not-turned-on-maduro/2019/04/13/bd0928de-5d2b-11e9-9625-01d48d50ef75_story.html?utm_term=.9fd5c8f4cda3&wpisrc=nl_todayworld&wpmm=1

[11] https://www.nytimes.com/2019/04/11/business/mankiw-moore-cain-federal-reserve.html

[12] https://finance.yahoo.com/news/trump-slams-fed-again-says-151047489.html

Asset Allocation Weekly (April 12, 2019)

by Asset Allocation Committee

The employment data is closely watched by financial markets; although the data isn’t necessarily a leading indicator for the economy, it is probably the most important from a political and social perspective.  Weak employment data is a worry for political incumbents and concerning to policymakers.  However, beyond the headline data, there are usually interesting trends worth noting.  In this week’s report, we will examine two trends that have longer term implications.

Career paths were part of corporate culture three decades ago.  Large companies often had junior executive programs, where promising young talent was brought to the firm and would follow a rotation of positions in numerous departments before finding a permanent home.  In other situations, college graduates would join a company and follow a path of positions of increasing responsibility.  However, over the years, outsourcing jobs overseas and increasing industry concentration[1] have probably reduced the number of entry level professional positions in the U.S.  This chart shows the percentage of production and non-supervisory workers compared to total non-farm employment.

In the 1970s, this percentage declined to a low of 66%.  However, since the early 1980s, the percentage has steadily increased in each business cycle.  This data suggests that an increasing number of jobs are non-management positions.  We suspect that college graduates are being forced to accept non-management positions as fewer of them are available for an increasing number of graduates.  Such disappointment has the potential to cause social unrest.  At the same time, reversing industry concentration would tend to boost the number of management jobs in the economy (every firm needs HR, finance, etc.).  Thus, support for anti-trust actions could become more popular.

Second, initial claims, on a weekly basis, fell to 40-year lows recently.  However, the weekly data is “noisy” and can be affected by floating holidays and weather.  Another way of looking at claims is to scale to the civilian non-institutional population.  This data is at historic lows.

This low level of claims is likely due, in part, to firms holding on to workers because of tight labor conditions.  A rising number of retirees will lift the non-working civilian non-institutional population but fewer workers will tend to depress claims.  In any case, this level of claims compared to the population is remarkably low and would argue that wages should rise.

Overall, these two charts offer insights into longer term issues in the labor market.  They won’t have an immediate effect on financial markets, but both signal potential for further disruption.

View the PDF


[1] https://finance.eller.arizona.edu/sites/finance/files/grullon_11.4.16.pdf

Daily Comment (April 12, 2019)

by Bill O’Grady and Thomas Wash

[Posted: 9:30 AM EDT] We are seeing a risk-on day.  Other than this sentence, there will be no discussion of Brexit today.  Here is what we are watching:

Chinese data: Bank loans rose much more than expected, with CNY 1.69 trillion extended compared to expectations of CNY 1.25 trillion.  Total financing rose to CNY 2.86 trillion compared to the CNY 1.85 trillion expected.  Although the data does suggest that China’s announced liquidity expansion is starting to make its way into the economy, it’s important to note that recent actions pale in comparison to what we saw in 2009-10.

The yearly growth rate of bank loans in March was 13.7%., up from 13.4% in February.  This is welcome growth but not enough to boost global growth.

M2 growth remains sluggish.

Meanwhile, China’s trade surplus jumped to $55.6 bn (goods only) as exports rose 5.4% but imports fell 8.1%.  The decline in imports is worrisome as this sector is usually sensitive to domestic demand.  Still, the rise in the trade surplus will boost China’s GDP.

We suspect the lift we are seeing this morning in risk assets is coming from expectations of better growth in China.  Although the data is showing some improvement, the growth rates are far from spectacular and the drop in imports is a concern.

Sudan: After ruling (or, perhaps, misruling) Sudan for three decades, President Omar Hassan al-Bashir has been ousted in a military coup[1] after four months of nearly continuous protests.  Although al-Bashir was a brutal ruler, his regime remains in place and the ouster probably won’t end the protests.  Sudan produces around 100 kbpd, but the concern is that if civil order collapses in Sudan then oil from South Sudan (about 200 kbpd) could be affected.  Sudan becomes another concern for oil supply, joining Libya and Algeria.  Oil prices have bounced this morning.

Cain in trouble: Four Senate Republicans have indicated they won’t support Herman Cain for Fed governor.[2]  Although this news doesn’t bode well for his nomination, it doesn’t necessarily kill it either.  For this number to sink Cain’s chances, all Democrats would have to reject his nomination.  That might not happen.  Still, if Cain is pulled, we would not be shocked to see Larry Kudlow get the nod, which would put two Trump loyalists on the Fed.

View the complete PDF


[1] https://www.nytimes.com/2019/04/11/world/africa/sudan-omar-hassan-al-bashir.html?emc=edit_MBE_p_20190412&nl=morning-briefing&nlid=5677267tion%3DtopNews&section=topNews&te=1

[2] https://www.washingtonpost.com/powerpost/pelosi-slams-trumps-fed-picks-as-totally-unsuited-unqualified/2019/04/11/8dfebc5c-5c5e-11e9-842d-7d3ed7eb3957_story.html?utm_term=.f3496aa0e38b

Daily Comment (April 11, 2019)

by Bill O’Grady and Thomas Wash

[Posted: 9:30 AM EDT] Lots of news this morning.  Here is what we are watching: 

Assange arrested: The Ecuadorian government has removed Julian Assange’s asylum status and he has been arrested in London.[1]  We expect him to eventually be extradited to the U.S.[2]  Assange is a controversial figure; Wikileaks has exposed all sorts of confidential information that governments would prefer to keep secret.  His leaks seemed to take a partisan direction in the 2016 election.  Thus, he has lots of enemies.  It will be interesting to see how he gets prosecuted.

Central banks: Yesterday, the ECB and the Fed[3] gave us essentially dovish signals.  As we noted yesterday, the ECB told the markets it has other tools to support the Eurozone economy.  The Fed strongly suggested that policy would be on hold for the rest of the year.  In our 2019 Outlook, we named a monetary policy error as one of the four risks facing the financial markets.  It appears we can assume that this risk has been eliminated.

Mankiw Rule update: The Taylor Rule is designed to calculate the neutral policy rate given core inflation and the measure of slack in the economy.  John Taylor measured slack using the difference between actual GDP and potential GDP.  The Taylor Rule assumes that the Fed should have an inflation target in its policy and should try to generate enough economic activity to maintain an economy near full utilization.  The rule will generate an estimate of the neutral policy rate; in theory, if the current fed funds target is below the calculated rate then the central bank should raise rates.  Greg Mankiw, a former chair of the Council of Economic Advisers in the Bush White House and current Harvard professor, developed a similar measure that substitutes the unemployment rate for the difficult-to-observe potential GDP measure.

We have taken the original Mankiw rule and created three other variations.  Specifically, our models use core CPI and either the unemployment rate, the employment/population ratio, involuntary part-time employment or yearly wage growth for non-supervisory workers.  All four compare inflation and some measure of slack.  Here is the most recent data:

This month, all the models are showing a drop in the estimated target rate.  Three of the models would still suggest the FOMC is behind the curve and needs to be increasing the policy rate.  However, the employment /population ratio implies a rather high level of slack in the economy and would suggest the Fed has already lifted rates more than necessary.  Given the uncertainty in the economy, coupled with political pressure, we expect the FOMC to remain on the sidelines.

Brexit: As has been the case during this whole event, the extension was a compromise.  Macron wanted a very short extension as did PM May.  Most of the EU wanted to extend the deadline up to a year.  They split the difference, with the deadline being moved to October 31 (we suspect the irony was lost on the participants).[4]  The U.K. will participate in European elections, although the EMPs won’t necessarily stay very long.

So, the good news is that, just maybe, we won’t have to talk about Brexit every day for a while.  Still, the whole process (or lack thereof) has been painful to watch and perhaps all of it has missed the real issue.  Those of us who live in democracies have become habituated to the notion that compromise is possible on every point of contention.[5]  To some extent, that is what makes democracy work.  The American founders created a divided government that would foster compromise.  But, there are some issues for which compromise probably isn’t possible.  Slavery turned out to be one; that was resolved through war.  The two-state solution in Israel probably isn’t workable because both parties claim the same land as theirs.  With Brexit, there really isn’t a workable middle ground.  All the solutions that avoid a hard break put the U.K. in a less advantageous position than it would have been by simply remaining within the EU.  So, the real decision is to either stay or leave abruptly.  From an economic standpoint, it is hard to see how the U.K. will be better off with a hard break, but socially and politically it might be.  It is natural for politicians to try to find a middling solution that would give most of the benefits of being in the EU, while satisfying those who want to leave.  However, that natural inclination is probably not bringing us closer to a resolution.  Polls suggest the U.K. public is closely divided on leaving.[6]  This problem may lead to another referendum but, even if the results are reversed, the British public will remain divided.  From a market perspective, in the short run, staying in the EU is the better option.  In the long run, it isn’t as clear cut; if Germany doesn’t accept the role of regional hegemon and start absorbing EU domestic demand (in the form of a trade deficit), then the EU could devolve and therefore leaving early might have its advantages.

In light of this news, the financial markets are mostly unchanged.  The EU does one thing really well—it delays hard decisions.  It would not surprise us to see another delay around Halloween.  So, the financial markets are assuming the status quo continues.  It’s probably the right call.

Trade news: There are reports that the U.S. and China are planning to create enforcement offices to monitor any trade agreements.[7]  Although this doesn’t eliminate all the potential sticking points, it does resolve an important one.

Cain in trouble: Although the Trump administration hasn’t completed the vetting process for Herman Cain’s nomination for the Fed, Senators Romney (R-UT), Murkowski (R-AK) and Gardner (R-CO) have announced they won’t support his nomination.  Assuming all Democrats oppose his nomination, the loss of one more Republican will doom his chances.  Interestingly enough, the controversy surrounding Cain has reduced opposition to Stephen Moore.  If Cain fails, we would not be surprised to see Larry Kudlow get the nod.

Dalai Lama hospitalized: The Dalai Lama is in a New Delhi hospital with a chest infection.[8]  Although his condition is considered good, the news does raise questions about his succession.  The CPC has always considered the Dalai Lama a threat because he represents a power that the party can’t control.  China has consistently indicated it wants to approve the next Dalai Lama, which means the Buddhist designation process would be subsumed under the Chinese state.[9]

Australian elections: Australia will hold elections on May 18.[10]  Current polls suggest that Labor is favored 53% to 47% in a two-party race, but the Liberal-National Coalition (conservative incumbent government) holds a small lead in a multi-party race.[11]

Energy update: Crude oil inventories rose 7.0 mb last week compared to the forecast rise of 2.5 mb.

In the details, refining activity rose 1.1%, near expectations.  Estimated U.S. production was unchanged at 12.2 mbpd.  Crude oil imports fell 0.2 mbpd, while exports fell 0.4 mbpd.

(Sources: DOE, CIM)

This is the seasonal pattern chart for commercial crude oil inventories.  We are nearing the end of the spring build season and will probably not achieve average, although the gap has narrowed significantly over the next two weeks.

Refinery activity is still lagging average.

(Sources: DOE, CIM)

Usually by this week we are seeing utilization above 90%.  Given the 7.2 mb decline in gasoline stocks, we would look for rising utilization in the coming weeks.

Based on oil inventories alone, fair value for crude oil is $55.33.  Based on the EUR, fair value is $51.99.  Using both independent variables, a more complete way of looking at the data, fair value is $52.27.  Current prices are running well above fair value.  Geopolitical risks, including the unrest in Libya, continued problems in Iraq, falling Venezuelan output[12] and the upcoming decision on Iranian oil export waivers, are lifting prices.  However, our data does suggest the markets are getting a bit rich, so evidence that any of these situations are improving will likely lead to a pullback in prices.

View the complete PDF


[1]https://apnews.com/53b9db6a174742168622f66749a61c4c?utm_source=newsletter&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=newsletter_axiosam&stream=top

[2] https://www.washingtonpost.com/world/europe/wikileakss-julian-assange-evicted-from-ecuador-embassy-in-london/2019/04/11/1bd87b58-8f5f-11e8-ae59-01880eac5f1d_story.html?utm_term=.41778ebdded4&wpisrc=nl_politics&wpmm=1

[3] https://www.ft.com/content/ac3cfa72-5bae-11e9-9dde-7aedca0a081a?emailId=5caec3df0f7aa7000439d880&segmentId=22011ee7-896a-8c4c-22a0-7603348b7f22

[4] https://www.washingtonpost.com/world/europe/theresa-may-heads-to-decisive-eu-summit-to-beg-for-more-time-before-britain-brexits/2019/04/10/1b342ffa-5622-11e9-aa83-504f086bf5d6_story.html?utm_term=.f1e45d2e1d77&wpisrc=nl_todayworld&wpmm=1 and https://www.nytimes.com/2019/04/10/world/europe/uk-eu-brexit-extension.html

[5] https://www.bloomberg.com/opinion/articles/2019-04-03/brexit-in-the-end-the-u-k-s-choice-will-be-stay-or-go?cmpid=BBD041019_AUT&utm_medium=email&utm_source=newsletter&utm_term=190410&utm_campaign=authers

[6] https://www.telegraph.co.uk/politics/2019/04/08/exclusive-britons-split-middle-no-deal-no-brexit-telegraph-poll/

[7] https://www.ft.com/content/4a2ae4e4-5bcb-11e9-9dde-7aedca0a081a?emailId=5caec3df0f7aa7000439d880&segmentId=22011ee7-896a-8c4c-22a0-7603348b7f22&list=intlhomepage

[8] https://www.reuters.com/article/us-china-tibet-dalai-lama/dalai-lama-83-hospitalized-with-chest-infection-idUSKCN1RL2EW

[9] https://www.ndtv.com/world-news/china-says-dalai-lamas-successor-must-have-its-approval-2020939

[10] https://www.ft.com/content/0967dfa6-5b9a-11e9-939a-341f5ada9d40?emailId=5caec3df0f7aa7000439d880&segmentId=22011ee7-896a-8c4c-22a0-7603348b7f22

[11] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Opinion_polling_for_the_2019_Australian_federal_election

[12] https://www.reuters.com/article/us-iea-oil/venezuela-oil-output-plummets-to-870000-bpd-on-outages-sanctions-iea-idUSKCN1RN0QY?il=0

Daily Comment (April 10, 2019)

by Bill O’Grady and Thomas Wash

[Posted: 9:30 AM EDT] It’s a very quiet morning in front of some important news today.  Brexit, the ECB meeting and Fed minutes are all on tap this morning.  Here is what we are watching:

ECB: The ECB has pushed the first rate hike into next year (and it will be unlikely even then).  Other than that, everything else remains unchanged.  The ECB is in a difficult spot.  The EU economy is clearly slowing, but with its policy rate already negative it’s not clear if additional cuts will help.  And, new aggressive actions might have a “whiff of panic.”  In the press conference, ECB President Draghi intimated that the central bank has policy tools to ease further; the markets are taking his comments as dovish as the EUR has weakened.

Brexit: PM May has met with French President Macron and German Chancellor Merkel.  The EU intends to offer a long extension, to perhaps the end of the year or the end of Q1 2020, with the option of leaving before the deadline if a deal is reached.[1]  The EU wants a longer deadline because it doesn’t want another year of monthly cliffhangers.  This is a nightmare outcome for the Brexit crowd; the longer the break is delayed, the more likely it is that the U.K. never leaves.  At the same time, it’s hard to see how PM May can stick around with such a long deadline.  However, she is nothing if not tenacious and because she has already won a leadership vote the Tories are sort of stuck with her until December.

Fed minutes: There will be great interest in seeing any comments on how policy reversed, but given the sanitized nature of this report we doubt any real insight will emerge.  We will have to wait until 2024 when the actual transcripts are released to hear what really happened.  The other item of interest is the FOMC’s adjustment of its inflation target policy.  Vice Chair Clarida suggested in discussions yesterday that the Fed might allow inflation to run above target for a period if it had been below target previously.[2]  This policy change would allow the Fed to be more dovish and signal to markets that breaking the 2% target would not necessarily mean an immediate move to tighten.  In early June, the Fed will hold a conference in Chicago on the inflation targeting issue.

China/EU summit: By all accounts, China caved to EU demands.[3]  The agreement[4] pretty much gave the EU everything it asked for, including meetings on human rights, reductions in industrial subsidies[5] and reduced technology transfers.[6]  Although diplomats are lauding the meeting as a “win-win,” in reality, the EU was prepared to exit the meeting due to the lack of progress.[7]  China could not afford a two-front war on trade and thus the EU likely benefited from the difficult U.S./China trade negotiations.

The IMF and trade: Yesterday, we noted that the IMF had lowered global growth estimates.  The fund noted that one of the uncertainties surrounding the forecast was trade policy.  What the world is struggling to understand is that the U.S. is fundamentally changing its trade policy.  This may be the biggest change in U.S. trade policy since Nixon closed the gold window and ended the Bretton Woods system.  The Nixon administration faced an external accounts problem.  By closing the gold window and floating the dollar, Nixon forced the adjustment on foreign nations.  However, the cost was inflation.  Under Reagan and his successors, the U.S. position was shifted to open trade to weaken inflation.  Thus, globalization was supported to contain prices.  Trump is shifting this policy to reduce the external balance but, unlike Nixon, he is mostly using tariffs[8] instead of dollar weakness (Nixon also used tariffs but mostly relied on currency depreciation).  However, we expect the current administration to eventually seek dollar weakness.  A significant way to weaken the dollar is to undermine the perception of Fed independence; the proposals to add Herman Cain and Stephen Moore could be related to this goal.[9]  Nixon also undermined Fed independence in a public campaign to embarrass Fed Chair Burns.  Even if Cain and Moore are not appointed,[10] the die has already been cast.  If the president gives up on both, he can more easily appoint conventional doves (current Fed Presidents Bullard and Kashkari would be my recommendation) to the open governor positions.  This outcome would not meet Trump’s aim of loyalty, but it would give him the same outcome without the drama.

Oil news: Uncertainty surrounding Libya remains elevated as General Hifter continues to move on Tripoli.[11]  While we would not be surprised to see Hifter gain control of the capital, his actions will probably not stabilize oil production as militia groups continue to operate despite Hifter’s march on the western parts of Libya.  Meanwhile, Iraqi oil output unexpectedly fell[12] and Venezuelan output plunged 0.5 mbpd in March to 960 kbpd.  All this news is supportive for oil prices.

Israel elections: Although the two major right-wing party groups each won 35 seats in the Knesset,[13] it appears PM Netanyahu will be able to put together a government.[14]  This will make him the longest serving PM in Israel’s history.

A conflict with Italy?  Italy has raised its deficit/GDP projections on forecasts of weaker economic growth.[15]  The EU is apparently not taking this news well and is making noise about rejecting Rome’s spending plans.[16]  We don’t expect the EU to follow through but a conflict with Italy will further boost populism in Europe.  In addition, fiscal expansion is exactly what the EU needs so punishing Italy is counterproductive.

View the complete PDF


[1] https://finance.yahoo.com/news/eu-poised-grant-britain-long-brexit-delay-emergency-summit-053526295.html

[2] https://www.wsj.com/articles/fed-to-review-inflation-targeting-policy-tools-and-communications-11554849900?mod=hp_major_pos10

[3] https://www.politico.eu/article/eu-china-summit-result-assist-donald-trump/?utm_source=POLITICO.EU&utm_campaign=9f233a4c90-EMAIL_CAMPAIGN_2019_04_10_05_01&utm_medium=email&utm_term=0_10959edeb5-9f233a4c90-190334489

[4] https://www.consilium.europa.eu/media/39020/euchina-joint-statement-9april2019.pdf?utm_source=POLITICO.EU&utm_campaign=9f233a4c90-EMAIL_CAMPAIGN_2019_04_10_05_01&utm_medium=email&utm_term=0_10959edeb5-9f233a4c90-190334489

[5] https://www.reuters.com/article/us-eu-china/assertive-eu-to-face-resistant-china-at-trade-focused-summit-idUSKCN1RL00B

[6] https://www.ft.com/content/4a37a40c-5add-11e9-9dde-7aedca0a081a?emailId=5cad621b558ee20004214ea7&segmentId=22011ee7-896a-8c4c-22a0-7603348b7f22

[7] https://www.scmp.com/news/china/diplomacy/article/3005470/joint-statement-threat-eu-diplomats-nearly-walked-out-talks?utm_source=POLITICO.EU&utm_campaign=9f233a4c90-EMAIL_CAMPAIGN_2019_04_10_05_01&utm_medium=email&utm_term=0_10959edeb5-9f233a4c90-190334489

[8] https://finance.yahoo.com/news/trump-message-world-trade-wars-204544517.html

[9] https://finance.yahoo.com/news/why-trump-wants-to-manipulate-the-federal-reserve-123602758.html

[10] https://www.politico.com/story/2019/04/09/herman-cain-federal-reserve-trump-1264072

[11] https://www.washingtonpost.com/world/africa/the-west-and-its-allies-legitimized-a-renegade-libyan-general-then-they-remained-silent-as-he-marched-on-the-capital/2019/04/09/a9a402ae-5a2a-11e9-98d4-844088d135f2_story.html?utm_term=.5a5c2effdd24&wpisrc=nl_todayworld&wpmm=1

[12] https://www.spglobal.com/platts/en/market-insights/latest-news/oil/040919-iraqi-mar-crude-output-falls-45000-b-d-to-45-million-b-d-somo

[13] https://www.washingtonpost.com/world/israeli-elections-to-decide-netanyahus-fateas-voters-head-to-the-polls/2019/04/08/df9859b2-5a18-11e9-98d4-844088d135f2_story.html?wpisrc=nl_todayworld&wpmm=1

[14] https://www.nytimes.com/2019/04/09/world/middleeast/israel-election-results.html?action=click&emc=edit_MBE_p_20190410&module=Top+Stories&nl=morning-briefing&nlid=56772670410&pgtype=Homepage&section=topNews&te=1

[15] https://www.ft.com/content/c48db112-5af9-11e9-9dde-7aedca0a081a?emailId=5cad621b558ee20004214ea7&segmentId=22011ee7-896a-8c4c-22a0-7603348b7f22

[16] https://www.politico.eu/article/italy-bigger-budget-deficit-that-may-provoke-brussels-european-commission/?utm_source=POLITICO.EU&utm_campaign=9f233a4c90-EMAIL_CAMPAIGN_2019_04_10_05_01&utm_medium=email&utm_term=0_10959edeb5-9f233a4c90-190334489

Daily Comment (April 9, 2019)

by Bill O’Grady and Thomas Wash

[Posted: 9:30 AM EDT] It’s a very quiet morning in front of Brexit deadlines.  The only economic news of note was weak Chinese car sales (-12.7% in March).  Here is what we are watching:

BREAKING NEWS: Italy reduces its GDP forecast to 0.1% from 1.0% this year.  This action will increase its deficit/GDP ratio.  The IMF lowered its world GDP growth forecast for 2019 to 3.3% from 3.5%, which was a bigger decline than forecast.

Brexit: PM May is on the continent to ask for an extension.[1]  She wants to stay in the EU until the end of May.  There are some in the EU that want to give her a flexible extension[2] for a year, but allow the U.K. to leave sooner if a deal is reached.  May is reluctant to accept a long delay as it will be seen by Tory Brexit supporters as a delay with no end.[3]  Meanwhile, talks between May and Corbyn[4] continue on the idea of a customs union with the EU.[5]  A customs union has its own problems (it would prevent the U.K. from striking deals on tariffs with the rest of the world, for example), but, politically, it would only pass with a subset of MP votes from Labour and the Conservatives.  This could split both parties and lead to a political realignment.  Another complicating issue is that if the U.K. stays past mid-May it will need to participate in EU elections, which is something the hardline Brexit supporters loathe.[6]

There are probably four potential outcomes this week.  The most likely is a short delay with promises of extensions.  We doubt a workable deal can emerge from Parliament and we don’t expect the EU to force the U.K. out of the EU.[7]  A long delay is the second most likely result.  But, in any case, a hard Brexit is the least likely outcome, which is reflected in the financial markets.  The GBP remains steady despite all the uncertainty.

China/EU summit: Meetings between the two sides begin tomorrow.  Talks have taken on an air of urgency as the EU has become increasingly hostile toward Beijing.  We suspect European leaders are seeing two major threats from China.  First, China is using its Belt and Road project to divide Europe.  Italy’s recent decision to sign a memo of understanding highlights this risk.  Second, China is moving up the value chain and ruthlessly using state power to dominate industries and using direct purchases of European companies to favor Chinese supply chains.[8]  China is framing the dispute as the EU following Washington’s lead,[9] but the reality is that Europe has discovered China is becoming a geopolitical rival to the U.S. and it has no good response.

EU tariffs?  The Trump administration is considering $11 bn in tariffs on EU goods.[10]  This proposal is partly in response to a WTO ruling that EU aircraft subsidies harmed U.S. interests.[11]

Oil news: India is delaying its purchases of Iranian oil, awaiting U.S. decisions on sanctions waivers.[12]  Frackers are using production methods that boost production quickly but also dissipate wells rapidly.  This is leading to faster depletion rates and excess output of associated natural gas.[13]  The faster depletion rates mean drilling must continue at a rapid pace just to keep production steady.  If investment begins to decline, oil supplies could tighten further and support oil prices.

China v. bitcoin: Chinese officials are considering banning bitcoin mining.[14]  China is the world’s largest producer of technology designed to mine bitcoins but the National Development and Reform Commission (NDRC) argued that the mining itself is wasteful and should not be permitted.  We have wondered for a while why China would permit such activities; bitcoin has become the vehicle of choice for criminal activity and would be a currency outside of state control.  The position of the NDRC would seem to be more consistent with the degree of social and political control the Xi government supports.

Tech regulation: The U.K. is considering a measure that would penalize social media firms for allowing harmful content to be posted on their platforms.[15]  Although the rules would only apply to the U.K., they could become the basis for regulation in other countries.  If it becomes law, it would force the social media platforms to more systematically police its user-posted content and dramatically increase its cost of doing business.  The U.K. regulation could be part of more regulatory actions in other nations.[16]

Chart du jour (plus one): Although equity values continue to trend higher, retail investors are still shying away from stocks.

This chart shows the S&P 500 with retail money market funds as measured by ICI.  In 2007, money market funds rose rapidly as the real estate crisis unfolded.  This area, shown in gray, coincided with market weakness.  The decline in money market funds coincided with the beginning of the current bull market.  We have also placed orange areas on the chart that show periods when money market fund levels fell below $920 bn.  Equities tended to stall during these times.  Since mid-2017, we have seen a steady rise in money market funds and levels rose above $1.0 trillion in early 2018, which also ushered in a period of broad consolidation.  The pattern in retail money market funds is similar to what was seen during the panic in 2005-08.

The recent rally in equities does not appear to be supported by falling retail money market levels.[17]  Company buybacks are thought to be supporting equities.[18]  Still, without the return of retail investors, it is difficult to see how this rally could extend much further.  We note that flows into equities in the form of mutual funds and ETFs have been mostly negative since the middle of last year.

Note that flows were negative in 2016 but reversed rapidly as the Fed delayed policy tightening.  If we see a similar pattern this year, a challenge of 3000 on the S&P is quite possible.

View the complete PDF


[1] https://www.ft.com/content/d10acc5a-59e5-11e9-939a-341f5ada9d40?emailId=5cac0f7c5f28c30004fe9f16&segmentId=22011ee7-896a-8c4c-22a0-7603348b7f22 and https://www.reuters.com/article/us-britain-eu/theresa-may-to-ask-merkel-and-macron-for-brexit-delay-idUSKCN1RK2HP?il=0

[2] https://www.politico.eu/pro/brexit-flextension-plan-gains-traction/

[3] https://www.ft.com/content/1c92be22-59fe-11e9-939a-341f5ada9d40?emailId=5cac0f7c5f28c30004fe9f16&segmentId=22011ee7-896a-8c4c-22a0-7603348b7f22

[4] https://www.nytimes.com/2019/04/08/world/europe/brexit-corbyn-theresa-may-compromise.html?emc=edit_MBE_p_20190409&nl=morning-briefing&nlid=5677267tion%3DtopNews&section=topNews&te=1

[5] https://www.ft.com/content/48dcc7f8-5a07-11e9-939a-341f5ada9d40?emailId=5cac0f7c5f28c30004fe9f16&segmentId=22011ee7-896a-8c4c-22a0-7603348b7f22

[6] https://www.ft.com/content/0fed22d0-5a20-11e9-939a-341f5ada9d40?emailId=5cac0f7c5f28c30004fe9f16&segmentId=22011ee7-896a-8c4c-22a0-7603348b7f22

[7] https://www.washingtonpost.com/world/europe/this-is-a-pivotal-week-for-brexit-here-are-four-ways-it-could-end/2019/04/08/05c94490-5a03-11e9-98d4-844088d135f2_story.html?utm_term=.99b05fc2dabf&wpisrc=nl_todayworld&wpmm=1

[8] https://www.foreignaffairs.com/articles/china/2019-04-03/why-europe-getting-tough-china and https://www.politico.eu/blogs/the-coming-wars/2019/04/how-europe-learned-to-fear-china/?utm_source=POLITICO.EU&utm_campaign=e0900b0c22-EMAIL_CAMPAIGN_2019_04_09_04_40&utm_medium=email&utm_term=0_10959edeb5-e0900b0c22-190334489

[9] https://www.politico.eu/article/chinas-envoy-to-europe-washington-is-getting-between-us/?utm_source=POLITICO.EU&utm_campaign=e0900b0c22-EMAIL_CAMPAIGN_2019_04_09_04_40&utm_medium=email&utm_term=0_10959edeb5-e0900b0c22-190334489

[10] https://finance.yahoo.com/news/us-floats-tariffs-11bn-eu-products-061755773.html

[11] https://www.ft.com/content/c381615a-5a55-11e9-9dde-7aedca0a081a?emailId=5cac0f7c5f28c30004fe9f16&segmentId=22011ee7-896a-8c4c-22a0-7603348b7f22 and https://www.wsj.com/articles/u-s-to-impose-tariffs-on-11-billion-of-eu-goods-11554770493?mod=hp_lead_pos4

[12] https://www.reuters.com/article/us-usa-iran-india/india-delays-may-order-for-iran-oil-awaits-clarity-on-sanctions-waiver-sources-idUSKCN1RL0PB

[13] https://www.wsj.com/articles/frackers-chasing-fast-oil-output-are-on-a-treadmill-11554721202?mod=itp_wsj&ru=yahoo

[14] https://www.reuters.com/article/us-china-cryptocurrency/china-says-it-wants-to-eliminate-bitcoin-mining-idUSKCN1RL0C4

[15] https://www.washingtonpost.com/technology/2019/04/07/uk-unveils-sweeping-plan-penalize-facebook-google-harmful-online-content/?utm_term=.86f84f2d7dd3&wpisrc=nl_daily202&wpmm=1 and https://www.nytimes.com/2019/04/07/business/britain-internet-regulations.html?emc=edit_MBE_p_20190409&nl=morning-briefing&nlid=5677267ion%3DwhatElse&section=whatElse&te=1

[16] https://www.axios.com/scoop-senators-target-the-ways-the-web-tricks-you-1554761685-0d393953-967d-4362-954d-08bcf5ad27c3.html?utm_source=newsletter&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=newsletter_axiosam&stream=top

[17] https://www.axios.com/newsletters/axios-markets-3dc392f3-edf6-46fe-9177-4688f4bb2f8b.html (see #3)

[18] https://www.axios.com/newsletters/axios-markets-89a6d4f2-bb17-4d1d-8922-860c0a0da999.html?chunk=0#story0

Weekly Geopolitical Report – When Hegemons Fade (April 8, 2019)

by Bill O’Grady

In our Daily Comment report, a section on Brexit has become something of a regular feature.  As part of keeping up with developments, we have commented on nearly every twist and turn (or lack thereof) in the Brexit process.  In a recent WGR series, we discussed the Irish problem[1] and how it relates to Brexit.

As we watch Brexit unfold, one persistent theme has emerged—much of Brexit is about unresolved issues surrounding the end of the British Empire.  Britain was the global hegemon from 1815 to around 1920 (although the nation still thought it was in charge until the end of WWII).  Historians tend to view the shift from one hegemon to another as a clear, abrupt break.  But, in reality, faded hegemons tend to cling to elements of former glory.  Although global influence may have waned, the vestiges of power still affect policy and national self-image.  For example, Spain’s era as global hegemon ended around 1640 after wars with the Dutch exhausted Spain’s power.  Still, Spain held possessions in the Western Hemisphere until the Spanish-American War in 1896-98.  That war finally ended the Spanish Empire.

There is an element of Brexit that is trying to recapture former glory.  Sadly, Brexit may make it clear that Britain is no longer a major global power.

In this report, we will discuss the geopolitics of Europe and Britain.  Using this geopolitical analysis, we will examine the British Empire and how it devolved.  These two analyses will be used to examine the path of Brexit.  As always, we will conclude with market ramifications.

View the full report


[1] See WGRs, The Irish Question: Part I (2/25/2019) and Part II (3/4/2019).

Daily Comment (April 8, 2019)

by Bill O’Grady and Thomas Wash

[Posted: 9:30 AM EDT] Happy Monday!  Although we are in spring, a massive winter storm is moving over the northern plains and will delay planting in the northern Corn Belt.  It will also increase flooding in the major river systems in a couple of weeks.  Here is what we are watching:

Elections this week: Israelis go to the polls tomorrow as PM Netanyahu tries to win another term.  In Israeli politics, no major party ever wins a majority and must form a coalition government with smaller parties.  Although we expect Netanyahu to prevail, he does face a formidable opponent in Benny Gantz, a retired general with extensive national security experience.  It will likely take a few weeks after the election for a government to be formed.  On Thursday, India, the world’s largest democracy, starts the election process that will take several weeks to complete.

Brexit: At least on paper, this is the deadline week for Brexit.  In reality, we expect a delay of at least until the end of June,[1] and perhaps much longer.  PM May and Labour’s Corbyn have been talking off and on but no signs of progress have emerged[2]; the talks themselves have upset party leaders on both sides.[3]  Meanwhile, the EU will also be meeting this week to discuss Brexit.  French President Macron has been taking a hard line against the U.K. but we doubt his position will carry the day.[4]  The “natural” path is to “kick the can down the road” a bit further.

China/U.S. trade: Both sides continue to tout progress but admit that hard decisions remain to be addressed.[5]  We continue to expect an agreement to emerge, perhaps by the end of April.

War in Libya?  American forces operating in Libya have been evacuated[6] as Gen. Khalifa Hifter faces stiff resistance in his march on Tripoli.  Hifter’s forces control the eastern part of Libya and last week moved on the western part of the country.  Although it is difficult to confirm, it appears that Hifter believed he had arrangements with militias[7] in the western regions to support his incursion.  Unfortunately, the militia groups splintered, meaning Hifter’s forces are facing much more resistance than he expected.  The fighting has given oil prices a boost.[8]

OPEC: Russia is indicating it may lift oil output in H2 as oil prices trend higher.[9]  Russian oil companies face a tax regime that essentially has a windfall profit tax.  In other words, the higher the oil price, the more tax liability Russian oil firms face.[10]  Thus, support for higher prices tends to wane among Russian oil firms as prices rise.  Saudi Arabia, on the other hand, continues to press for higher prices.  Also, we reported last week that unnamed Saudi officials were threatening to move away from dollar pricing for oil.[11]  The Saudi oil minister indicated today that such a change isn’t going to occur.[12]  Although we have been supportive of oil prices, at current levels, we would expect to see temptations rise for OPEC cheating.

IRGC a terrorist organization?  According to reports, the U.S. is considering naming the Iranian Republican Guard Corp a foreign terrorist organization (FTO).[13]  If the administration follows through on the threat, it would be the first time a government entity would be given this designation.  The FTO designation would greatly increase the financial sanction tools against Iran.  At the same time, it would invite strong retaliation from Iran.[14]  This designation will increase tensions with Iran and would be supportive for oil prices.

Cain for the FOMC: The establishment backlash against Herman Cain continues, while the administration continues to back his appointment.[15]  The FT is warning that the administration may take an even more aggressive line against the FOMC and directly threaten the Fed’s independence by firing Chair Powell.[16]  On the one hand, we rather doubt that President Trump would take such aggressive action against Powell.  On the other hand, the fact that a well-respected financial paper would even suggest such an attack is possible is remarkable by itself.  As we have noted before, central bank independence is not scriptural.  There is nothing sacred about central bank independence.  In fact, such stature is instrumental; if you want low inflation, an independent central bank is helpful to that effort.  But, if your goal is to reflate then an independent central bank can impede that process.  If the goal is reflation, a less independent FOMC would make sense.

China’s foreign reserves: China’s foreign reserves rose $8.6 bn in March.[17]  For the most part, reserve levels remain steady.

Chart du jour: We have noticed that retail wage growth has been very strong recently.

At the end of 2017, wage growth in retail was only about 1.0%.  Since then, it has soared to nearly 5.0% annual growth, far exceeding overall private sector wage growth.  Two factors appear to be driving the rise.  First, state and local government regulations have been boosting minimum wage laws.  This action, coupled with announced pay increases by high-profile firms, is lifting retail wages.  Second, anecdotally, there is evidence to suggest that tightening labor markets are forcing retailers to boost pay.[18]

View the complete PDF


[1] https://www.bbc.com/news/uk-politics-47825841?wpisrc=nl_todayworld&wpmm=1

[2] https://www.theguardian.com/politics/2019/apr/07/how-cross-party-brexit-talks-left-both-sides-frustrated-labour-tories and https://www.nytimes.com/2019/04/07/world/europe/theresa-may-brexit-compromise.html?emc=edit_MBE_p_20190408&nl=morning-briefing&nlid=5677267ion%3DwhatElse&section=whatElse&te=1

[3] https://www.ft.com/content/a45bf41e-5935-11e9-939a-341f5ada9d40?emailId=5caabdd68e66890004718a32&segmentId=22011ee7-896a-8c4c-22a0-7603348b7f22

[4] https://www.ft.com/content/bd91c0a6-5243-11e9-b401-8d9ef1626294

[5] https://www.wsj.com/articles/u-s-china-tout-progress-vow-to-continue-trade-talks-11554509376?mod=hp_lead_pos3

[6] https://www.washingtonpost.com/world/middle_east/american-troops-in-libya-moved-out-of-country-as-violence-escalates-near-capital/2019/04/07/bf754a6c-58b2-11e9-aa83-504f086bf5d6_story.html?utm_term=.22e373f40e68&wpisrc=nl_todayworld&wpmm=1

[7] https://www.nytimes.com/2019/04/07/world/africa/libya-us-troops.html?emc=edit_MBE_p_20190408&nl=morning-briefing&nlid=5677267ion%3DwhatElse&section=whatElse&te=1

[8] https://www.wsj.com/articles/libyan-crisis-presents-new-worry-for-white-houseand-oil-markets-11554503741?mod=hp_lista_pos3

[9] https://www.reuters.com/article/us-russia-opec/russia-signals-opec-and-allies-should-raise-oil-output-from-june-idUSKCN1RK0TW

[10] https://www.nytimes.com/2016/03/24/world/europe/russia-light-on-cash-weighs-risks-of-a-heavy-tax-on-oil-giants.html

[11] https://www.reuters.com/article/us-saudi-usa-oil-exclusive/exclusive-saudi-arabia-threatens-to-ditch-dollar-oil-trades-to-stop-nopec-sources-idUSKCN1RH008

[12] https://www.nasdaq.com/article/saudi-arabia-says-no-change-to-policy-of-trading-oil-in-dollars-20190408-00098

[13] https://www.wsj.com/articles/u-s-to-designate-iranian-guard-corps-a-foreign-terrorist-organization-11554499401?mod=hp_lead_pos2

[14] https://www.reuters.com/article/us-usa-iran-lawmaker/iran-to-blacklist-u-s-military-if-washington-designates-guards-as-terrorists-mp-idUSKCN1RI04X?feedType=RSS&feedName=topNews

[15] https://www.wsj.com/articles/herman-cain-expects-cumbersome-scrutiny-if-he-is-nominated-to-fed-board-11554559518?mod=hp_lead_pos1

[16] https://www.ft.com/content/d04270c6-57a5-11e9-a3db-1fe89bedc16e

[17] https://www.reuters.com/article/us-china-economy-forex-reserve/chinas-march-forex-reserves-rise-to-seven-month-high-idUSKCN1RJ05Q

[18] https://www.axios.com/newsletters/axios-markets-3dc392f3-edf6-46fe-9177-4688f4bb2f8b.html  see #2

Asset Allocation Weekly (April 5, 2019)

by Asset Allocation Committee

Mortgage-backed securities have rather odd characteristics compared to Treasuries.  At their most basic level, mortgages are bonds—prices are inversely related to yields.  The pricing on mortgages assumes a certain level of refinancing activity.  However, when yields rise, expected mortgage duration tends to extend because mortgage holders are less likely to refinance.  When yields fall, expected duration shortens as mortgage holders replace their existing mortgages with new ones at lower rates.  Usually, mortgage bonds tend to act like options; they act “normal” within a certain range of yields, but duration adjustments occur if yields change above a given range.

Some bond fund managers are required to maintain a given duration level.  If the manager is holding mortgages and refinancing activity rises then the fund’s duration could shorten.  This would require the manager to take steps to re-extend duration.  A fast way to accomplish this goal would be to buy long-duration Treasury futures.  These instruments are liquid and generally have a set duration.

In general, refinancing tends to take place when interest rates fall below the level of the current mortgage, taking closing costs into account.

The chart on the left shows the 10-year T-note yield; we have regressed a time trend through the data.  Clearly, yields have been on a downward path since 1990.  The chart on the right shows the 10-year T-note yield less trend on the lower line and the mortgage refinancing index on the upper line.  Evidently, refinancing activity tends to rise when rates are below trend.  Since 2016, the steady rise in rates relative to trend has depressed refinancing.  However, we have seen a lift in refinancing recently.  On the one hand, the dip in rates doesn’t look like enough to overcome closing costs.  On the other hand, paying a higher rate on a new mortgage may be the only way a homeowner can capture price appreciation.

This chart shows the ratio of the new rate to the old rate.  When the old rate is higher than the new rate, the ratio is less than 1.0.  Note that this ratio is now at a new record high.  Essentially, buyers are refinancing at a less advantageous rate to extract home equity.

We suspect the most important factors of the recent bond rally have been changes in monetary policy expectations and reduced inflation fears.  But, the rise in refinancing has likely played a role as well.  We doubt that the attractiveness of locking in a higher mortgage rate will continue indefinitely, therefore this bullish factor should dissipate in the coming weeks.

View the PDF