Daily Comment (June 25, 2020)

by Bill O’Grady, Thomas Wash, and Patrick Fearon-Hernandez, CFA

[Posted: 9:30 AM EDT]

The 13th episode of the Confluence of Ideas podcast is available; it is our first in a series of reports on the November elections.

Good morning, all.  Lots going on today.  For the second consecutive day, we are starting with weaker equity markets.  In fact, almost everything is red this morning except Treasuries.  In equities, there are worries that institutional managers may try to capture Q2’s surge in equities with an aggressive rebalance and that would be bearish for stocks in the very short run.  We update the pandemic news; it appears another surge in cases is upon us, although we are noting some differences compared to the initial rise.  We update China news this morning, noting a real cold war is emerging on the India/China frontier and there is some divergence in policy direction between the White House and Congress.  The economic news includes the IMF’s downgrade of global GDP.  Poland is open to U.S. troops.  We are noting some flooding issues and there was an earthquake yesterday in Mexico; we also follow up on the arctic heatwave.  The Weekly Energy Update is available.  Here are the details:

COVID-19: The number of reported cases is 9,440,535 with 483,207 deaths and 4,754,755 recoveries.  In the U.S., there are 2,381,369 confirmed cases with 121,979 deaths and 656,161 recoveries.  For those who like to keep score at home, the FT has created a nifty interactive chart that allows one to compare cases across nations using similar scaling metrics.  The Axios U.S. state map has been updated.

Virology:

  • The WSJ details the rise in new cases; although increased testing is a factor, it does look like we are seeing increased spreading.
  • One factor we are seeing is fewer deaths per the number of cases.
(Sources: Johns Hopkins, CIM)

This chart looks at the rolling seven-day change in new cases and fatalities.  We are seeing a clear upswing in cases, but fatalities are continuing to decline.  It is possible that there is a lag between cases and fatalities.  In fact, the above chart suggests there is about a 10-day lag, so some increase in fatalities wouldn’t be a surprise.  But, at the same time, we are well into that 10-day window and, so far, fatalities haven’t jumped yet.  We suspect two changes have occurred that may slow the rate of deaths; first, the medical system has probably gotten better at treatment.  We know ventilator use has slowed as less invasive techniques have proven to be more effective.  Second, it is probably the case that vulnerable populations (the elderly, chronic conditions, etc.) are being more careful in public and those contracting the disease are younger and healthier.  That doesn’t mean this group can’t die from the disease, but the chances are lower.

  • Therefore, we may be seeing a slow transition from avoiding the disease at all costs to learning to live with it. It is apparent that lockdowns do work in slowing the rate of infections, but the economic cost is horrific.  Being more selective in who stays home, taking other measures (distancing in social situations, mask wearing) and working on mitigation therapies are all probably in our future until widespread vaccination develops.
  • Disney (DIS, 112.07) may be forced to delay reopening its theme parks as workers push back against the company’s plans. Other companies and industries are facing similar concerns.  Several states are reconsidering their plans to reopen as well.
  • India is facing a massive problem in its medical system due to the pandemic.
  • Genetic researchers in the U.K. have identified 68 genes associated with the risks surrounding COVID-19. One of the mysteries of the virus is the wide variation in symptoms.  Some people who are infected exhibit no symptoms, while others are seriously affected.  Their research suggests that COVID-19 is not just a respiratory illness but a cardiovascular one as well.  It has also been found that Type A blood groups are at higher risk of serious complications, while Type O groups are not.  If specific markers can be determined, genetic testing could indicate who is vulnerable and who is not and thus allow low-risk groups to reengage in social and economic activities (which could have much less attractive aspects as well).

China news: 

  • As the powers between Congress and the executive branch have evolved over time, the president generally has a greater say in foreign policy. That doesn’t mean Congress has no impact, but, in the day-to-day operation of foreign policy, the White House is in charge.  Still, for better or worse, Congress reflects the broader populous and thus has exhibited swings in sentiment over various policy issues.  Accordingly, in terms of foreign policy, Congress can push for sanctions and other policy measures that the president may be reluctant to implement as they might undermine other policy goals.  This is a situation that has been part of American political history since Washington (our first president had to fend off congressional desires to join France against England in French Revolutionary Wars).
    • Currently, Congress is pushing for numerous measures to punish China over various issues. Regarding Hong Kong, the White House is trying to prevent Congress from passing mandatory sanctions.
    • Congress is pressing to ease restrictions that would allow Americans to sue China over pandemic costs.
    • There are divisions within the executive branch as well. The Pentagon has published a list of 20 Chinese companies with ties to the Chinese military; it is presumed this list was created to reduce these companies’ ability to tap U.S. financial markets and perhaps sanction trade.  The Senate is pushing for greater transparency for foreign firms listing on U.S. exchanges.  It appears the goal of the bill is to force Chinese firms to give up their ties to the security state for access to U.S. financial markets.  National Security Advisor O’Brien recently gave a speech that was sharply critical of the CPC.
    • It is often the case that a president doesn’t necessarily oppose measures brought by Congress or other members of the executive branch; what presidents oppose are measures that restrict their ability to enjoy policy flexibility.
  • Although direct hostilities appear to have eased in the India/China frontier, it does appear both sides are digging in for potential future conflicts. India has blocked the importation of various Chinese goods in retaliation for the recent attacks.
  • There are increasing worries about military conflicts between China and the U.S.

Trade policy news:

Foreign news:

Economic news:

Weather news:

View the complete PDF

Weekly Energy Update (June 25, 2020)

by Bill O’Grady, Thomas Wash, and Patrick Fearon-Hernandez, CFA

(NB:  Due to the upcoming Independence Day holiday, the next report will be published on July 9.)

Here is an updated crude oil price chart.  The oil market has stabilized at higher levels after April’s historic collapse.

(Source: Barchart.com)

Crude oil inventories rose less than market expectations, with stockpiles rising 1.4 mb compared to forecasts of a +2.0 mb build.  The SPR added 2.0 mb this week.

In the details, U.S. crude oil production rose 0.5 mbpd to 11.0 mbpd.  Exports rose 0.7 mbpd, while imports fell 0.1 mbpd.  Refining activity rose 0.8%, modestly higher than expected.  After major declines for the past several weeks, the level of unaccounted-for crude oil recovered sharply this week.

Unaccounted-for crude oil is a balancing item in the weekly energy balance sheet.  To make the data balance, this line item is a plug figure, but that doesn’t mean it doesn’t matter.  This week’s number is -53 kbpd.  This is a very small number and suggests the DOE is getting the data fixed.  The rise in production suggests that the unaccounted-for crude oil data was being affected more by crude oil stored in areas unreported, although falling output addressed some of this figure as well.

We have been seeing oil flow into the Strategic Petroleum Reserve (SPR) in recent weeks.  The government is offering storage in the SPR to relieve inventory constraints.  The chart below shows the history of the level of inventory in the SPR by party holding the White House.

Although President Carter was an exception, in general, Republicans have tended to build the SPR, while Democrats have held it mostly steady.  This may be due, in part, to the fact that the GOP tends to favor the energy industry.  President Trump has not followed that pattern until recently.  We do expect these injections to be temporary as the rise is due to aiding the industry and not a deliberate policy to increase the stockpile.  But, since mid-April, 18.8 mb have gone into the SPR, easing bearish price pressures.

(Sources: DOE, CIM)

The above chart shows the annual seasonal pattern for crude oil inventories.  This week’s data showed another modest rise in crude oil stockpiles.  We are in the beginning of the seasonal draw for crude oil.  The continued rise in inventories is bearish for prices.

Based on our oil inventory/price model, fair value is $26.85; using the euro/price model, fair value is $52.56.  The combined model, a broader analysis of the oil price, generates a fair value of $39.99.  We are starting to see a wide divergence between the EUR and oil inventory models.  The weakness we are seeing in the dollar, which we believe may have “legs,” is bullish for crude oil and may overcome the bearish oil inventory overhang.

Gasoline consumption remains below average, but the recovery is unmistakable.

(Sources: DOE, CIM)

Still, the refining industry is continuing to struggle, and without improvement in this sector the demand for crude oil could stall in the coming weeks.

View the PDF

Daily Comment (June 24, 2020)

by Bill O’Grady, Thomas Wash, and Patrick Fearon-Hernandez, CFA

[Posted: 9:30 AM EDT]

Good morning!  The 13th episode of the Confluence of Ideas podcast is available; the topic is the first in a series of episodes on the November elections.

Equity futures are lower this morning; market talk suggests it’s due to rising COVID-19 infections, but a good, old-fashioned “pause to refresh” is just as likely.  Poland’s President Duda visits the White House today just before elections in his country.  The Segway is done.  We update the news from China.  We offer some thoughts on reports that the administration is considering additional stimulus and other measures.  There is growing concern about commercial real estate.  Tech leaders are opposed to immigration restriction measures.  Our usual commentary on COVID-19 is available.  Here are the details:

China news: 

  • It appears that India and China are reducing recent border tensions. This is the usual pattern; we have seen a cycle of rising tensions followed by steps to prevent a broader war.  The risk is, of course, that the border tensions, at some juncture, do lead to something worse.  One area of concern is that PM Modi has less ability to control public opinion in India, compared to Chairman Xi; it is not inconceivable that an Indian PM at some point in the future may not be able to contain the groundswell and may be forced into a conflict.  In an upcoming WGR, we will look at the history of this issue.
  • For the past few days, we have been commenting on the recent EU/China videoconference. In the aftermath, it is clear that EU leaders are unhappy with China’s behavior, but are also reluctant to press too hard on Beijing for fear of hurting trade and investment relations.  The recent row over comments from Peter Navarro suggests similar sentiment exists in the U.S. as well.  The closest historical parallel, in our view, to China’s relations with the U.S., or the EU too, was between the U.K. and Germany from 1870 to 1914.  There was a growing geopolitical rivalry, but deep economic ties as well.

Economic and policy news:

Foreign news:

  • The EU is considering banning U.S. travelers from the bloc due to concerns about COVID-19. Interestingly enough, the ban would not exclude China.
  • North Korea has engaged in a number of provocative acts recently. It appears that Kim Jong Un may be dialing back some of the tensions.  To some extent, what we have seen recently is consistent with North Korea’s behavior.  Pyongyang often takes aggressive actions and raises tensions, then promises to behave better if it gets sanctions relief, or aid.  What might be different this time is that this news may signal a reengagement of Kim Jong Un; there has been some evidence to suggest he has been sidelined and his sister, Kim Yo Jong, has been driving policy.  She appears to be much more hawkish than her brother.  Knowing what is happening in North Korea is always a challenge, but it is possible we are seeing a divided leadership.
  • Russia is holding its military parades today that it usually holds on May 9. These parades were delayed due to the pandemic.  Tomorrow, Russians vote to extend Putin’s rule; we expect him to win.
  • British landlords and tenants are facing an end to support, reflecting similar worries in the U.S.

Tech news:

COVID-19:  The number of reported cases is 9,273,773 with 478,160 deaths and 4,645,628 recoveries.  In the U.S., there are 2,347,102 confirmed cases with 121,225 deaths and 647,548 recoveries.  For those who like to keep score at home, the FT has created a nifty interactive chart that allows one to compare cases across nations using similar scaling metrics.

Virology:

Finally, there are reports of soaring temperatures in Siberia.  Although it hasn’t been verified, the city of Verkhoyansk reported a high temperature of just 100o Fahrenheit on Saturday.  The Russian Arctic is also seeing higher temperatures, with temperatures rising about 0.69o every decade, compared to world temperatures rising about 0.18o every decade.  The rise in temperatures is thawing permafrost and contributed to a recent diesel fuel spill, as weakening permafrost damaged a storage tank.  One way this change affects U.S. weather is that it weakens the jet stream and can leave weather systems “parked” over parts of the U.S., leading to extended heat waves, or rainfall and flooding.

View the complete PDF

Daily Comment (June 23, 2020)

by Bill O’Grady, Thomas Wash, and Patrick Fearon-Hernandez, CFA

[Posted: 9:30 AM EDT]

Good morning!  The 13th episode of the Confluence of Ideas podcast is available; the topic is the first in a series of episodes on the November elections.  U.S. equity futures are higher again this morning, with the rest of the world rising as well.  In other markets, gold is at a seven-month high, WTI is over $40 per barrel and the dollar is lower.  We did see some volatility overnight after Peter Navarro seemed to indicate that the trade agreement with China is “over.”  S&P futures quickly dropped about 50 points.  The White House moved in short order to clarify Navarro’s comments, confirming that the Phase One arrangement is still intact.  We update China and economic news.  We also cover domestic policy and foreign news.  Our usual commentary on COVID-19 is available.  Here are the details:

China news: 

Economic news:

  • The WSJ notes that there has been a surge in household savings in the U.S. Much of this jump was due to the influx of fiscal support coupled with the lockdown that reduced spending.  If the savings persists, it will have an impact on economic growth.  However, it is quite possible that as the lockdowns ease, spending will accelerate, and the level of savings will decline.  What is unknown is if there will be higher levels of savings in the aftermath of the pandemic.  If there is, government dissaving, business dissaving or a smaller trade deficit will result.  Our expectation, if the change is permanent, is that the fiscal deficit will absorb most of the savings.

Policy news:

Foreign news:

COVID-19:  The number of reported cases is 9,115,878 with 472,541 deaths and 4,544,196 recoveries.  In the U.S., there are 2,312,302 confirmed cases with 120,402 deaths and 640,198 recoveries.  For those who like to keep score at home, the FT has created a nifty interactive chart that allows one to compare cases across nations using similar scaling metrics.  We are seeing a surge in the R0 data, suggesting a rising pace of infections in the U.S.  Here is the state-by-state data.

Virology:

Finally, some good news—honeybee populations saw a lower than normal winter die-off this year, after suffering a larger loss last year.  Honeybees are critical to numerous U.S. crops, so the recovery is positive.

View the complete PDF

Weekly Geopolitical Report – The Geopolitics of the 2020 Election: Part V (June 22, 2020)

by Bill O’Grady | PDF

This is the final report in our five-part series on the geopolitics of the 2020 election, which was divided into nine sections.  This week, we conclude the report by covering the eighth and ninth sections, the base cases for a Trump or Biden win and market ramifications.

Read the full report

Daily Comment (June 22, 2020)

by Bill O’Grady, Thomas Wash, and Patrick Fearon-Hernandez, CFA

[Posted: 9:30 AM EDT]

Good morning and happy Monday.  U.S. equity futures are higher this morning, while Europe is lower.  Treasuries yields are lower, as well as the dollar, while gold is up. EU leaders are talking to Chairman Xi today; the new security law passed in Beijing, meaning it has become law in Hong Kong.  We recap banking data.  President Trump says he will talk to Maduro.  Our usual commentary on COVID-19 is available.   Here are the details:

China news: 

  • EU and Chinese leaders are scheduled to have a video conference today. European leaders have become increasingly alarmed by China’s behavior.  As we have discussed before, the EU has noted Beijing’s aggressive narrative control over COVID-19.  In addition, China’s investment activities in Europe has raised fears that China will use the weakness caused by the pandemic to take control of European businesses.  Expectations surrounding the talks are low, suggesting that not much will come from the conference.
  • Although the news was no surprise, Beijing is moving to ratify the new security law for Hong Kong. The Standing Committee of the Politburo will convene a special session on June 28 and impose the new law on the former colony.  One part of the new law will establish a new agency to execute national security in Hong Kong, signaling it is taking concrete steps to apply the new legislation.  The decision to create this new bureaucracy quashes any hope that the law would be passed but implemented with a “light touch.” This law will effectively end Hong Kong’s “one country, two systems” approach.  We expect this decision to further undermine U.S. and U.K. relations with China.
  • China has had a new surge of COVID-19 cases, with the outbreak centered on food markets in Beijing. As we noted last week, Nordic salmon was said to have tested positive for the virus, although it was generally believed the virus likely came from infected workers handling the product.  Although handling or eating food that has been found to have the virus hasn’t been reported as a vector for spreading the disease, blaming the outbreak on imported food does fit Beijing’s narrative of the virus coming from outside China.  Over the weekend, China has banned some chicken imports coming from a Tyson (TSN, 63.22) plant with a high number of COVID-19 cases.   We would not be surprised to see China use this news as an excuse for failing to meet its obligations set in the Phase One trade agreement.
  • The PBOC held its loan prime rate steady, suggesting that we are probably approaching the end of the rate cutting cycle in China.

Economic news:

  • The Fed has updated its May data on the banking system. There were three items that are worth noting.  First, households are being very cautious.  Consumer credit fell 1.1% from last year.

Second, deposits have soared, rising 20.7% from last year, the fastest growth for this data (which goes back to 1973.

Third, business lending has soared (and partly accounts for the jump in deposits).

What does this tell us?  Households are cutting their borrowing and increasing their cash holdings, while businesses are tapping credit lines and gathering cash too.  There is a pile of liquidity in the financial system and where it eventually ends up will be critical for financial and commodity markets.

Policy news:

COVID-19:   The number of reported cases is 8,975,776 with 468,724 deaths and 4,448,281 recoveries.   In the U.S., there are 2,280,969 confirmed cases with 119,977 deaths and 622,133 recoveries.  For those who like to keep score at home, the FT has created a nifty interactive chart that allows one to compare cases across nations using similar scaling metrics.

Virology:

View the complete PDF

Asset Allocation Weekly (June 19, 2020)

by Asset Allocation Committee

By now, investors have rightly come around to the idea that the equity market’s strong rebound since late March can be largely ascribed to the aggressive monetary and fiscal policies put in place to counter the coronavirus crisis.  The economic downturn from the pandemic lockdown has been severe, pushing unemployment to its highest level since the Great Depression and freezing demand for most products.  All the same, the Federal Reserve’s massive bond-buying and the federal government’s gigantic spending programs have convinced many people that the public sector is doing what’s necessary to support a quick recovery and minimize the long-term damage.  Investors have bid up stocks in response.  The technology-heavy NASDAQ has even reached a new record high.

What’s gotten less attention is that the policy moves have also helped limit the damage in the debt markets.  That’s especially clear in the market for riskier debt that the credit rating firms consider to be below-investment grade, i.e., “high yield” or “junk” bonds.  One way to measure the demand for that kind of debt is to compare the yield investors are requiring for that kind of bond versus the yield on a risk-free bond of similar maturity, such as the five-year Treasury note.  As shown in the chart below, the effective yield on the BofA Merrill Lynch High-Yield Master II Index spiked to as much as 8.57% at the peak of the coronavirus crisis in March and April.  At the same time, safe-haven buying drove down the yield on the five-year Treasury note to just 0.39%.  That boosted the high-yield spread over the five-year Treasury all the way to 8.18% compared with an average spread of 5.61% over the last several decades.

As shown in the chart, the April spread of 8.18% was one full standard deviation above the average spread since 1988.  But instead of rising even further above the one-standard deviation mark as typically happens during a recession, the spread has fallen modestly in May and June.  We think that’s a clear indication that investor nerves have been calmed by the aggressive monetary and fiscal policy already put into place.  One particularly helpful move was the Fed’s decision to purchase corporate debt, ultimately including debt that had been downgraded to junk status after March 22 and corporate bond ETFs that might hold high-yield obligations.

By pumping liquidity into the economy and helping many firms avoid bankruptcy, the U.S. policy moves have helped bolster not only junk bonds, but also investment-grade bonds and equities.  For example, the chart below shows how the spread of corporate investment-grade yields over the 10-year Treasury also initially spiked and then narrowed after the policy moves were implemented.  The pattern looks very similar to the narrowing of high-yield spreads.  Although the financial markets remain volatile and credit spreads could widen again, we think the early signs of credit spread narrowing support increasing exposure to corporate credit in portfolios.

View the PDF

Daily Comment (June 19, 2020)

by Bill O’Grady, Thomas Wash, and Patrick Fearon-Hernandez, CFA

[Posted: 9:30 AM EDT]

Good morning and happy Friday! U.S. equity futures are higher this morning as optimism over the economy continues to rise.  China remains in the news.  The forbearance being offered by lenders is having an adverse impact on the industry designed to deal with bad debt—bankruptcy lawyers and trustees, repossession firms, auction houses, etc.  Our usual commentary on COVID-19 is available.  Additionally, there are a couple of interesting market items.  Here are the details:

China news: 

  • SoS Pompeo met with Yang Jiechi yesterday in Hawaii. Both sides have been mostly tight-lipped about the outcome; it appears that the U.S. and China stated their positions on various issues but if there was any attempt to find commonality, it isn’t obvious.  Meanwhile, President Trump indicated the U.S. could still sever relations with China.
  • Large changes create opportunities. As conditions change in Hong Kong, other nations are looking to provide a home for various businesses currently in the former colony.  Japan is attempting to bring financial firms to Tokyo, for example.  At the same time, as the U.S. considers making Chinese firms delist from U.S. stock exchanges, Hong Kong bankers are trying to get these firms to list in Hong Kong.  Although only time will tell, it is possible that China will attempt to preserve Hong Kong’s financial power; as the U.S. leans toward closing off American financial markets from China, the Xi regime may need Hong Kong’s financial expertise.  That doesn’t mean that the CPC won’t try to end democracy in Hong Kong, but it may give the financial industry wide latitude to operate.
  • We continue to closely monitor the situation on the Indian/Chinese frontier. The leadership of both nations appear to be trying to contain nationalist fervor that could force escalation.  China, due to its social controls, can generally manage such issues.  India, on the other hand, has an active tabloid press and thus PM Modi will have his hands full trying to keep group emotions in check.
  • One outcome from the border clash is that New Delhi may decide to join the West in dealing with China. India has traditionally avoided such arrangements.  It was a key member of the non-aligned movement during the Cold War and tried to avoid joining either the Communist Bloc or the Free World.  If the border issue leads to India joining the West, it will add to the encirclement of China and would be seen as a major loss for Beijing.

Policy news:

  • One of the strengths of the U.S. system of capitalism is the ability to deal with failure. In Europe, going bankrupt could put a person in debtor’s prison; in the U.S., debts are written down and the debtor could start over.  The U.S. system isn’t perfect, but it works remarkably well compared to other nations.  An infrastructure has developed around bankruptcy and bad debt; there are law firms that specialize in bankruptcies.  Towing firms engage in repossession; banks have workout groups.  Auction houses specialize in selling off the assets that are repossessed.  Firms clean up houses after evictions to prepare for sale or lease.  All this activity forces creditors to quickly adjust the value of their loan assets and allows debtors to start over.  Additionally, the repossessed asset then gets put back into the economy, usually at an attractive price, to find a new use.
    • That process is mostly on hold. Despite rising bankruptcies on the horizon, at present, a set of policy decisions has effectively frozen the process.  In many states, evictions have been postponed.  Banks have been encouraged to offer debt service forbearance.  If the current downturn is mostly a short-term phenomenon and all will return to normal soon, these actions make sense.  However, if the recovery turns out to be long (as we expect), these policies will tend to keep debt backed by assets that have fallen in value in limbo.
    • If policy prevents the process of foreclosure, as we see in China and Japan, it can lead to slower growth. At the same time, the bankruptcy process, much like insurance, isn’t designed for systemic events.  In other words, the process works if bankruptcy is caused by poor management or bad luck for an individual; it doesn’t work as well if the bankruptcies are due to an event that causes widespread failure.  That’s what we saw in the Great Depression; the policy of the Hoover administration was to liquidate the loans aggressively, but that led to a debt/deflation spiral that collapsed the economy.
    • Policymakers seem to be leaning toward this event as systemic, so it has encouraged lenders to avoid immediate repossession and the Fed has been buying up corporate debt. The problem is that some of these loans are simply not going to get serviced and should be liquidated.  Unfortunately, it is hard to discern who is facing a solvency issue and who is facing a liquidity issue.  What we are doing works if it’s mostly the latter; it will create a Japan-like situation if it’s the former.
  • There is a growing call for a better way to fund small business. Although the SBA exists, its lending doesn’t appear to be filling the need.  So, there is some speculation that the Fed’s current program may become permanent.
    • Our two cents? A better way would be to reduce consolidation in the financial system and support the expansion of small banks.  Smaller banks seemed to do a better job of managing the PPP program; large banks do a good job with (a) massive loans to large borrowers, and (b) lending that is rules-based, like mortgages.  However, larger banks can only make money on operations that they can scale up and making individual lending decisions by human loan officers isn’t in their “sweet spot.”  That is a business that smaller banks can do more effectively.
  • European nations are on their way to implementing digital taxes. This will exacerbate trade tensions.

COVID-19:  The number of reported cases is 8,513,725 with 454,513 deaths and 4,181,443 recoveries.   In the U.S., there are 2,191,200 confirmed cases with 118,435 deaths and 599,115 recoveries.  For those who like to keep score at home, the FT has created a nifty interactive chart that allows one to compare cases across nations using similar scaling metrics.

Virology:

Markets:

View the complete PDF