Daily Comment (August 20, 2020)

by Bill O’Grady, Thomas Wash, and Patrick Fearon-Hernandez, CFA

[Posted: 9:30 AM EDT] | PDF

We are seeing some reversals of recent trends in the wake of the Fed minutes.  Currently, equity markets are lower this morning.  Some of the weakness is being attributed to the lack of new fiscal stimulus, but we think a better case can be made that the Fed disappointed, which we discuss below.  We update news on China, the pandemic and Belarus. And, being Thursday, the Weekly Energy Update is available.  Here are the details.

Fed policy: The Fed released the minutes of its July 28-29 meeting.  Let’s get to the point—the sentence that has roiled the market is this one: “Many participants judged that yield caps and targets were not warranted in the current environment but should remain an option.”  Financial markets have been building in the idea that the Fed was going to engage in financial repression.  Specifically, the expected policy mix was fixing interest rates across the yield curve, a slow reaction to rising inflation and continued policy accommodation.  This has led to low Treasury yields, higher gold and equity prices and narrowing credit spreads.  As the above quote indicates, there was a surprising degree of reluctance to embrace the idea.  Some of this hesitancy was due to the lack of upward pressure on interest rates (of course, part of the low rate situation is due to market expectations of yield curve control).  It was a decided minority (“a couple of participants”) who seemed to express support for the idea.  It won’t really be tested until rates rise.  But, in the end, it appears the FOMC is in a “wait and see mode,” keeping current policy in place but seems unlikely to add additional stimulus unless there is a decided decline in economic activity.  This is not what financial markets wanted to hear.  Our take is that Chair Powell is supportive of the concept of yield curve control, but the lack of support suggests the rest of the FOMC isn’t on board yet.  At the same time, we think the market’s assessment of the Fed’s future policy is correct; financial repression is likely.  The continued process to avoid preemptive rate hikes to quell inflation, the move to average inflation targeting and extensive forward guidance are all part of this policy.  It’s just that markets like clarity, and the Fed has little reason to provide it when the financial markets are already enforcing that policy.  The real test will be when there is a whiff of inflation; if long-end yields begin to rise, will the Fed tolerate it?  We doubt it will.  But we don’t know for sure and, apparently, neither do FOMC members.

In the rest of the minutes, the assessment of financial markets and the economy suggested that there was some improvement in economic and financial market conditions, although both were said to be sensitive to pandemic developments.  The staff economic outlook was generally upbeat, expecting stronger GDP and higher inflation in 2021 and 2022.  However, they did express concerns about a slowdown in H2 2020.  Participants were more guarded, noting the unequal dispersion of economic weakness caused by COVID-19.  They also expressed that the economy’s path was still highly uncertain; it is not clear if this uncertainty was due to their own analysis or from comments the regional presidents are hearing from their local business contacts.  They also expressed concern about the potential lack of fiscal support.  The committee members also noted continued risks to financial stability.  Overall, this meeting’s tone was “wait and see.”  Markets rarely like such indecision.

China news:

COVID-19: The number of reported cases is 22,427,939 with 788,030 deaths and 14,349,696 recoveries.  In the U.S., there are 5,530,247 confirmed cases with 173,193 deaths and 1,925,049 recoveries.  For illustration purposes, the FT has created an interactive chart that allows one to compare cases across nations using similar scaling metrics.  The FT has also issued an economic tracker that looks across countries with high frequency data on various factors.

(Source: FT)
  • The mask debate isn’t just a U.S. issue. The Scandinavian countries have provided very loose guidelines for using masks, citing that the benefits from using them do not offset the social issues of face coverings.

Economics and Markets

Belarus: Although Lukashenko has lost the workers and urban dwellers, the security forces remain loyal.  There have been anecdotal reports of former security forces rejecting the leader, but these rejections do not appear to be systemic at present.  Lukashenko remains adamant that he will remain in power.  The EU is trying to walk a narrow diplomatic line; it wants to reject Lukashenko’s actions but doesn’t want Putin to fear he will “lose” Belarus and militarize the situation.  Therefore, EU leaders have condemned Lukashenko’s actions, calling the elections a sham, but have not called for a new vote.  We could see targeted EU sanctions against individuals in the Lukashenko government.  President Putin has warned the EU against “meddling” in Belarus, but Lukashenko should not take comfort that the Russian president wants to keep him in power.

One interesting twist to the Belarus saga is that the country was a participant in China’s belt and road project.  Although investment levels were not all that large, China did arrange a line of credit to Minsk.  Lukashenko tried to diversify Belarus’s economy away from its deep dependence on Russia and thus cultivated China’s interest.  It isn’t clear if this investment will be secure if Lukashenko is ousted.

Navalny poisoned: Russian opposition leader Alexei Navalny is in a coma after an apparent poisoningHis condition appears grave.  Poisoning is an oft-deployed tactic of Russian security agencies against political enemies.  There is always a risk that such a blatant attack will backfire and lead to unrest; however, we believe that risk is low.

Coup in Mali: Mali has had its share of troubles in recent years.  There has been a constant fight against Islamist groups that has drained resources and displaced millions.  And, the government was seen as corrupt.  Although President Ibrahim Boubacar Keita was elected to office twice, he initially took control after a coup in 2012.  Yesterday, elements of the armed forces staged a coup, and the president has left office.  The coup leaders are promising to hold new elections soon.  Mali is Africa’s fourth largest gold producer; several gold mining companies with operations in Mali suffered a selloff in light of the news.

Brexit: Although talks continue, negotiators are stuck on the degree to which British truck drivers can traverse the EU and conduct business.  The U.K. wants drivers to have the ability to move across Europe and make multiple stops and deliveries.  The EU sees that as too close to being a member and wants to grant less freedom.  Although this issue probably won’t completely derail talks, it does suggest that a number of contentious issues remain; if talks fail, the GBP could decline.

Going postal: No, this isn’t about the recent mail controversy.  One of the proposals we have seen circulate would be for the Fed to offer limited banking services to the general public.  The banking system appears incapable of providing basic banking services to low-income households, leaving them to the tender mercies of payday check cashers and money orders.  The idea is that the Fed could provide basic services, but they would need a venue for such services.  In other countries, the venue has been post offices (Japan’s Postal Savings system is perhaps the most famous).  Of course, this would be a major expense for the Fed and perhaps for the USPS.  However, we note that JP Morgan (JPM, 98.55) has offered to install branch offices in postal stations.  This may be a way to head off the threat of competing directly with the Fed or it may offer the Fed a path to providing basic services but use the infrastructure that JP Morgan would provide.  We will continue to monitor this idea.

Policy odds and ends: Treasury Secretary Mnuchin has indicated that talks remain stalled but suggested the parties might resume negotiations because the House has returned to deal with the USPS.  Speaker Pelosi has suggested she would consider reducing the $3.0 trillion package passed by the House.  Republicans haven’t directly responded.  Both parties remain divided on the path forward on stimulus.  Business leaders are indicating that they probably won’t implement the payroll tax cut executive order because it only delays the tax, setting up a situation where companies will have to send the tax to the Treasury early next year.  The order is being dubbed as “unworkable.”

View PDF

Weekly Energy Update (August 20, 2020)

by Bill O’Grady, Thomas Wash, and Patrick Fearon-Hernandez, CFA | PDF

Here is an updated crude oil price chart.  The oil market has stabilized at higher levels after April’s historic collapse.

(Source: Barchart.com)

Crude oil inventories fell less than anticipated, declining 1.6 mb compared to forecasts of a 2.9 mb decline.  The SPR declined 2.7 mb as oil that was placed in the SPR for temporary storage is now being put back into the commercial system.  Taking the SPR into account, storage dropped 4.2 mb.

In the details, U.S. crude oil production was steady at 10.7 mbpd.  Exports plunged 1.0 mbpd, while imports rose 0.1 mbpd.  Refining activity fell 0.1%.

Unaccounted-for crude oil is a balancing item in the weekly energy balance sheet.  To make the data balance, this line item is a plug figure, but that doesn’t mean it doesn’t matter.  This week’s number is -421 kbpd.  Although the volatility of this number is elevated, the trend is slowly stabilizing.

(Sources: DOE, CIM)

The above chart shows the annual seasonal pattern for crude oil inventories.  This week’s data showed another decline in crude oil stockpiles.  We are approaching the end of the seasonal withdrawal period.  Although the declines of the last few weeks are supportive, stockpiles remain well above seasonal norms and remain a bearish factor.

Based on our oil inventory/price model, fair value is $36.48; using the euro/price model, fair value is $64.08.  The combined model, a broader analysis of the oil price, generates a fair value of $50.41.  The wide divergence continues between the EUR and oil inventory models.  As the trend in the dollar rolls over, it is bullish for crude oil.  Any supportive news on reducing the inventory overhang could be very bullish for crude oil.

Gasoline consumption remains stalled.  Although we probably won’t see the usual seasonal decline in consumption (there wasn’t much of a vacation season), the slowing of consumption does suggest a weaker economy.

In oil news, the Trump administration is postponing a politically fraught decision on ethanol.  There is a mandate from the EPA on ethanol blending.  The original law mandated that 36MM gallons of biofuels would be part of the transportation fuel mix by the early 2020s.  The industry has not been able to hit that number; last year, there was 15.8MM gallons produced, down slightly from the prior year.  The farming industry wants to force the mandate, whereas the petroleum industry, especially refiners, want to avoid it.  What happens in practice is that the government maintains the mandate but liberally grants waivers to refiners, meaning that the growth in ethanol production has been flat.  When the bill was signed by President Bush in 2007, it was assumed that gasoline demand would continue to rise.  In that way, the mandate could have been met without increasing the percentage of ethanol blended into gasoline.  But, the 2007-09 recession and the sluggish recovery that followed led to flattening gasoline consumption, meaning the only way to achieve the law’s goals is by increasing the blend percentage.

This year’s recession is likely to weaken demand further.  Not only was the drop in growth historic, the work from home trend that the pandemic triggered could fundamentally alter commuting.  Although public transportation demand has slowed, it is likely that at least some workers will work from home at least part time.  That means the mandate will become even more difficult to meet.  The administration is faced with displeasing two constituents—farmers and the oil industry.  There is really no solution that will please both.  So, we would not expect a resolution before November.

Often in political trends, we see an emerging development that faces a counter movement.  In other words, “the Empire strikes back.”  During the Reformation, for example, there was a counter-Reformation that eventually led to a kind of cold peace within Christendom.  Sometimes, the countertrend only slows the emerging one.  We may be seeing something in the latter with regard to oil energy.  The current administration is pro-petroleum, but the broader societal trend is heading in the opposite direction.  One item that tends to support this idea is that drilling activity remains soft even with the recovery in oil prices.  Major oil companies are rethinking their long-term strategies and governments are nudging them in this direction.  Whenever we observe potential inflection points, we try to look for items that both support and dispute the potential change in trend.  For example, the U.S. has taken steps to open more of Alaska for drilling.  If oil companies jump at the chance, the “death of oil” is probably premature.  On the other hand, if no actions are taken, it would bolster the case that the oil industry is on a long-term downtrend.  Here’s another bit of evidence contrary to the death of oil.  Chevron (CVX, 89.48) is looking to invest in Iraq.  If one thought that oil demand was going to decline, it is highly unlikely they would take the risk of drilling in a volatile political environment like Iraq.  So, the jury is still out, although the weak performance of oil stocks overall would suggest that the death of oil trend may still win out.  Another item supporting oil’s continued dominance is that the Democrats have removed language calling for the end of fossil fuel subsidies and tax breaks from the final party platform.  At the same time, we have seen a surge in “green” equity performance, suggesting the trend against oil may be gaining momentum.

Working in the oil industry, like any profession, has its good and bad points.  To the former, the work often pays very well.  It also can be interesting, taking its workers to different parts of the world in challenging environments.  Cutting edge technology is also part of the business.  On the downside, it is brutally cyclical; when its good, its great, but the troughs can be difficult.

This chart shows the percentage of oil and gas workers to total non-farm payrolls compared to inflation-adjusted oil prices.  As the chart shows, employment is sensitive to the price of oil.

A number of commodity industries are struggling to attract younger workers.  The average age of farmers has been rising for some time.  The reputation of the oil industry has been under pressure over the issue of climate change; it appears that younger workers are shunning the industry over those concerns.  If this trend continues, the industry can only survive by improving productivity.

Although reducing carbon emissions is helpful in offsetting the potential impact of climate change, in reality, even if all carbon emissions stopped today, the existing levels will continue to affect the climate for decades.  To truly reverse the impact of carbon in the atmosphere, we would need to remove the carbon that already exists.  Scientists and engineers have been working for some time on such technologies.  We note reports that Occidental Petroleum (OXY, 13.95) is working with privately held Carbon Engineering to build a carbon capture plant in the Permian basin.  If this technology develops, it is probably the most promising route to dealing with climate change.

The Trump administration is attempting to trigger the “snapback” provisions of the Iran nuclear deal even after its withdrawal from it.  The U.S. is claiming that it is still a “participant” despite its withdrawal and thus can request a return to earlier weapons embargoes that were part of the original agreement if Iran failed to comply.  We doubt this will go anywhere, meaning that the conventional weapons ban will likely expire in October.  It remains to be seen how the administration will react if states begin selling arms to Iran.  Russia and China could both decide to sell arms to thwart U.S. goals with Iran.

View PDF

Daily Comment (August 19, 2020)

by Bill O’Grady, Thomas Wash, and Patrick Fearon-Hernandez, CFA

[Posted: 9:30 AM EDT] | PDF

On this, the 29th anniversary of the August 1991 coup in the Soviet Union, it looks like the U.S. equity market will follow through on its rise yesterday to a new record-high close.  Today’s apparent follow-through comes despite very little coronavirus news…or perhaps because of it?  Most of today’s key news is political, as we outline below.

China: President Xi has reportedly launched a major purge of the country’s security personnel.  Since the purge commenced last month, dozens of high-level police and judicial officials have been arrested, fired, or sent for “ideological training,” including the Shanghai chief of police.  Xi has often purged officials in order to stamp out corruption or remove opponents and overly ambitious rivals, especially early in his tenure.  However, reports indicate this purge is much more sweeping.

  • Some commentators suggest the new firings merely represent another anti-corruption effort, but it’s likely that such a broad move also reflects growing political opposition against Xi within the Communist Party establishment.
  • That opposition is hard to see from the outside, but various reports by knowledgeable China observers, including former Australian Prime Minister Kevin Rudd, indicate Xi has generated considerable discontent within the Communist Party for several of his policy initiatives.  For example:
    • Many party officials dislike Xi’s abandonment of collective rule and his attempt to build a cult of personality in which he alone holds all power as an autocrat.
    • Xi’s reputation has also been heavily damaged by his failure to keep a lid on the novel coronavirus when it first surfaced last year.
    • Xi has generated pushback against his aggressive geopolitical moves in places like the South China Sea and the Himalayas.  Those moves represent an abandonment of Deng Xiaoping’s dictum to “hide your strength, bide your time.”  Many Communist Party officials are probably also uncomfortable with Xi’s failure to avoid an economic, political, and technological conflict with the U.S.  In simplistic terms, these concerns center on the possibility that Xi has misjudged China’s strength and has embarked on moves that are generating strong pushback from the U.S. and other Western democracies before China really has the power to follow through on them.
  • If the purge really does turn mostly on Xi’s need to stamp down burgeoning internal political opposition, his past success with purges suggests he will probably be successful.  All the same, if the breadth of the purge reflects how broad the political opposition has become, it also raises the risk of political instability at some point in the future.  That possibility, in turn, suggests that one thing missing from current U.S. policy toward China is an effort to play to Xi’s opponents, perhaps by offering a softer policy again if Chinese geopolitical or economic policy becomes less aggressive.
  • In any case, if Xi’s opponents were to gain power and the country became politically unstable, it would naturally be disruptive for global markets.  On the other hand, increased opposition to Xi overseas and a burgeoning political opposition at home could chasten Xi and lead him to cool his geopolitical and economic ambitions, at least temporarily.  That reaction might help cool global tensions and create a more favorable investment environment.

United States-China: As if to illustrate the U.S. pushback that Xi’s policies have generated, President Trump said he ordered the cancellation of last weekend’s planned U.S.-China meeting on the implementation of the “Phase I” trade deal, which the countries signed in January.  His administration has also urged university endowments to divest their holdings of Chinese stocks ahead of the companies potentially being delisted from American exchanges.  Those developments help explain today’s drop in the Chinese and Hong Kong stock markets.

Japan: Just months after his last regular checkup, Prime Minister Abe unexpectedly spent an entire day in a Tokyo hospital this week for unspecified medical tests.  Abe only has one year left in his final term as leader of the ruling Liberal Democratic Party, but the visit has led to growing speculation about his political future.  It also intensified maneuvering by his rivals for the chance to succeed him.  His main potential successors are Fumio Kishida and Shigeru Ishiba, both former ministers and leaders of party factions.  Separately, the Democratic Party for the People is expected to approve a merger today with the Constitutional Democratic Party of Japan, forming a more organized, numerically viable opposition to Abe and raising the prospect of snap elections.

Canada: A day after his previous finance minister quit, Prime Minister Trudeau named his deputy, Chrystia Freeland, as the country’s new finance minister and said he would suspend parliament until September 23 in order to develop a new plan for addressing the coronavirus pandemic and economic recovery.  That plan, which Mr. Trudeau hinted would include aggressive spending measures, would be subject to an immediate vote, giving the opposition parties—which hold a majority of seats in the legislature—a chance to defeat the Liberal government and trigger an election.

United States: The Democrats formally nominated Joe Biden as their candidate for president last night.  Biden is expected to formally accept the nomination in a speech on Thursday.

United States-India: Although Biden’s choice of Kamala Harris as his vice presidential running mate has excited many Indians, given her Indian heritage, reports say the Indian foreign policy establishment is becoming apprehensive about how a Biden-Harris administration might respond to Prime Minister Modi’s aggressive Hindu nationalist agenda, which has deeply alienated the country’s Muslim minority.

United States-Russia-China: After two days of U.S.-Russia meetings on extending the New START nuclear arms treaty, which is due to expire in February, administration officials signaled they are no longer insisting on China’s participation in a follow-on deal.  The change of approach should help ensure that the key arms limitation agreement will be extended.

European Union-Belarus-Russia: Ahead of today’s emergency EU summit to discuss the political crisis in Belarus, Russian President Vladimir Putin warned German Chancellor Merkel and French President Macron that he would not tolerate any outside pressure on the Belarusian leadership.  At the meeting, EU leaders are expected to discuss imposing sanctions on Belarusian leaders and officials who oversaw the recent election and the brutal response to the initial protests, which led to thousands of people being detained.

Mali: Renegade soldiers in Mali detained President Ibrahim Boubacar Keita, Prime Minister Boubou Cisse, and dozens of other senior officials in what appeared to be a coup attempt after months of civilian demonstrations calling for the government’s resignation.  Keita soon acquiesced in the takeover and announced his resignation.  According to the military, a transitional government will now be set up to rule until new elections.

COVID-19: Official data show confirmed cases have risen to 22,169,145 worldwide, with 781,575 deaths and 14,138,936 recoveries.  In the United States, confirmed cases rose to 5,482,823, with 171,833 deaths and 1,898,159 recoveries.  Here is the interactive chart from the Financial Times that allows you to compare cases and deaths among countries, scaled by population.

Virology

U.S. Policy Response

View PDF

Daily Comment (August 18, 2020)

by Bill O’Grady, Thomas Wash, and Patrick Fearon-Hernandez, CFA

[Posted: 9:30 AM EDT] | PDF

The modest uptick in risk assets so far today comes despite new U.S. moves to punish Chinese companies on national security and economic policy grounds, as well as the continued stalemate over a new U.S. coronavirus relief bill.  We review all the key news below.

United States: The Democratic Party opened its virtual convention last night with a theme of “We the People,” seeking to emphasize national unity while at the same time celebrating U.S. diversity.  The program included surprise appearances by several high-level Republicans, including former Governor John Kasich of Ohio and former Governor Christine Whitman of New Jersey, who argued for Republicans to support the presumptive Democratic candidate for president, Joe Biden.

United States-China: The Commerce Department issued new rules prohibiting non-U.S. firms from selling microprocessor chips made using U.S. technology to Chinese telecom equipment giant Huawei (002502.SZ, 3.00) without a special license. The rule even covers widely available, off-the-shelf chips made by overseas firms.  In addition, the department added 38 Huawei affiliates in 21 countries to its “Entity List,” which prevents companies from exporting U.S. technology to those entities without a license.

  • Given the dominance of U.S. technology in certain segments of chipmaking, the new rule reportedly amounts to a blanket ban on any chip sales to Huawei, hitting its 5G equipment and handset businesses.
  • By further crimping Huawei’s ability to operate, the moves will escalate the administration’s tough-on-China policy, highlighting the risk of even more bilateral tension and economic disruption down the road.  In fact, President Trump also signaled that his administration is considering similar moves against other Chinese firms on national security and economic policy concerns.

China:  According to a new study by law firm Baker McKenzie and economic consultancy Silk Road Associates, Chinese exports had already started losing global market share last year, before the coronavirus pandemic hit.  The study showed that Chinese exports of 1,200 products accounted for 22% of the world’s exports, 3 percentage points lower than in the previous year. For consumer goods, the country’s global market share fell by 4 percentage points to 42%.  The study found that the decline in China’s market share stemmed mostly from the U.S.-China trade dispute, the rise of new technologies, and corporate governance demands.

European Union: As EU member countries continue working to implement the bloc’s big, new coronavirus relief and mutualized debt program, the so-called “frugal four” countries that agreed to the program in return for higher rebates from the EU budget are now demanding that those rebates be increased by 2% per year to offset price inflation—despite expectations that inflation is likely to remain minimal in the EU for the foreseeable future.

Belarus: In a sign that President Lukashenko continues to lose support after the apparently fraudulent elections earlier this month, the autocrat was booed by workers at a major defense factory he was visiting.  The booing was notable because workers at the plant, which produces key components for Russia’s military, are probably among the best paid and highest privileged workers in the country.  It was also noteworthy because Lukashenko was using the occasion to announce he is preparing a referendum on a new constitution that could eventually lead to him handing over power.  Obviously, the workers weren’t buying it.

Canada: Finance Minister Morneau said he will step down, the biggest casualty to date from a scandal tying the Liberal government to a charity with close links to the family of Prime Minister Justin Trudeau.

COVID-19:  Official data show confirmed cases have risen to 21,916,639 worldwide, with 774,720 deaths and 13,908,270 recoveries.  In the United States, confirmed cases rose to 5,444,205, with 170,559 deaths and 1,865,580 recoveries.  Here is the interactive chart from the Financial Times that allows you to compare cases and deaths among countries, scaled by population.

Virology

Economic Impact

  • While the pandemic has hurt real estate properties of all types, it’s having an especially heavy impact on New York’s iconic Empire State Building as more companies embrace remote work or cheaper satellite offices outside city centers.  Some in the industry say the building is worse off than many peers because it relies on smaller office tenants, which tend to be more at risk during a downturn.
  • In the longer term, one little-discussed implication of the pandemic is that the disease and the associated economic disruption will likely push down birthrates and further slow population growth.  That’s starting to be an especially important concern for Japan, which already had one of the most rapidly aging societies even before the pandemic.
  • Even though China was able to minimize infections when the pandemic first broke out late last year, and has been staging an impressive economic recovery since then, it turns out that the recovery has widened income inequality, just as it has in many Western democracies.

Financial Market Impact

  • While the pandemic has helped touch off a sustained depreciation of the dollar versus other major currencies, key emerging market currencies continue to suffer even more.  The Brazilian real, the South African rand, and the Turkish lira have lost about 20% of their value against the dollar this year, putting the former two on course for their biggest annual declines since 2015. The Russian ruble and the Mexican peso have dropped roughly 15%.

U.S. Policy Response

  • Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell has warned that the ongoing discussions on a new coronavirus relief bill may not lead to a deal.  Media reports also say Republicans are considering further reducing their proposed stimulus amount.  Both developments are raising concerns that the fiscal rug could be pulled out from under the economy before a solid and sustainable recovery is in place.  Those concerns appear to be a key reason for the muted tenor of the risk markets so far today.

View PDF

Weekly Geopolitical Report – An Inflection Point in Lebanon (August 17, 2020)

by Bill O’Grady | PDF

On the afternoon of August 4, there was a massive explosion at the Port of Beirut.  The explosion was one of the largest non-nuclear blasts in history, a seismic event with a magnitude of 3.3 on the Richter scale.  At latest count, 220 have been confirmed dead, 110 are missing, and over 6,000 were injured.

The Middle East is undergoing significant change.  The U.S. is clearly reducing its footprint, leading nations within and outside the region to adapt.  The explosion occurred amid this evolving environment and it has the potential to be a catalyst to accelerate changes.

In this report, we will begin by detailing the event, followed by an examination of Lebanon’s political and economic backdrop to frame how these conditions contributed to the accident.  The third section will discuss the U.S. withdrawal and the scramble by players both inside and outside the region to gain control or protect their interests.  This discussion includes a look at the states affected by the machinations of others.  As always, we conclude with market ramifications.

Read the full report

Daily Comment (August 17, 2020)

by Bill O’Grady, Thomas Wash, and Patrick Fearon-Hernandez, CFA

[Posted: 9:30 AM EDT] | PDF

Happy Monday.  Equity markets are higher this morning as the S&P 500 slowly trends toward a new high.  Foreign news leads off our comments this morning, with a special focus on Belarus.  China news is next, followed by market and economic news.  We close with the pandemic update.  Here are the details.

Foreign news:

China news:

Market and Economic news:

COVID-19:  The number of reported cases is 21,707,773 with 775,926 deaths and 13,690,055 recoveries.  In the U.S., there are 5,404,115 confirmed cases with 170,052 deaths and 1,833,067 recoveries.  For illustration purposes, the FT has created an interactive chart that allows one to compare cases across nations using similar scaling metrics.  The FT has also issued an economic tracker that looks across countries with high frequency data on various factors.

View PDF

Daily Comment (August 14, 2020)

by Bill O’Grady, Thomas Wash, and Patrick Fearon-Hernandez, CFA

[Posted: 9:30 AM EDT] | PDF

Happy Friday!  It looks like a risk-off morning.  Foreign news is the opening focus—the U.S. has engineered the UAE’s recognition of Israel, only the third nation in the region (Jordan and Egypt are the others) to grant formal recognition.  China news comes next, in which Chinese concerns about financial sanctions and threats to Taiwan dominate.  We update the virus news and close with economics and markets.  Being Friday, the new Asset Allocation Weekly is available, along with the podcast and chart book; the topic this week is precious metals.  Here are the details.

Foreign news:

  • In a momentous breakthrough, the UAE has agreed to formally recognize Israel. The UAE offered Israel a dealif Israel didn’t annex areas of the West Bank, the UAE would grant formal recognition.  The U.S. was cool to the idea of annexation anyway, so, from the American perspective, this development is a win.
  • So, what’s the bigger picture here? The driving force behind this outcome, in our opinion, is the U.S. reducing its geopolitical footprint in the region.  A key “known/unknown” is how the world acts as the U.S. pulls back.  S. hegemonic management after WWII assumed that three “hot spots” would require constant U.S. engagement to prevent an outbreak of hostilities.  These areas were Europe, where the German problem had to be managed, the Far East, where the endemic conflict between Japan and China had to be quelled, and the Middle East, where a colonial legacy left states designed to be unstable.  Optimists believe that if the U.S. pulls back from these hot spots, Japan and China will work out their differences, German regional hegemony in Europe will be beneficial, and the Middle East will adjust without going to war.  Pessimists expect that optimists are falling into the trap of mistaking hope for a plan.
    • As the U.S. withdraws from the Middle East, the nations there need to figure out how to counteract Iran’s malign influence, control Turkish ambitions, and manage outside actors, such as Russia. Israel and the Gulf States have mutual interests—they all want to contain Iran, are uncomfortable with Russia, and have enough memories of the Ottomans to want to keep the Turks at bay.
    • As long as the U.S. was guaranteeing security, these nations could avoid uncomfortable compromises. But if that guarantee is fading, the Arab States and Israel have an urgency to make common cause.
    • And so, this agreement is a “win” for the optimists. And, it allows the U.S. to focus its efforts on China.
  • A theme we have held for a while is that if U.S./Chinese economic relations are set to fray, Mexico should be a major beneficiary. Although there is clear evidence of pressure, most U.S businesses, so far, are trying to keep their ties to China.  In addition, AMLO’s government in Mexico has not been considered “business friendly” and his management of the economy and the pandemic have been a disappointment.  Mexican equities have tended to underperform; over the past five years, the iShares Mexico ETF (EWW, 34.14) is down 37.1% compared to the S&P over the same time frame, which is up 61.6%.   However, at long last, perhaps Mexican leaders are starting to see their geographic advantage―reports suggest Mexico is working actively to lure U.S. firms that are considering leaving China.
  • For the first time, the Trump administration has seized Iranian fuel shipments that violate American sanctions. This action will further raise tensions between the two states.
  • The EU is formally protesting U.S. sanctions on the Nord Stream 2 project. This project would bring Russian natural gas to Europe under the Baltic Sea, bypassing Ukraine.  The U.S. has consistently opposed this project.

China news:

COVID-19:  The number of reported cases is 20,950,402 with 760,235 deaths and 13,015,379 recoveries.  In the U.S., there are 5,254,878 confirmed cases with 167,253 deaths and 1,774,648 recoveries.  For illustration purposes, the FT has created an interactive chart that allows one to compare cases across nations using similar scaling metrics.  The FT has also issued an economic tracker that looks across countries with high frequency data on various factors.  The Rt data shows 28 states with a reading less than one, a positive development.  The lowest state is Maine, while the highest is Hawaii.

  • Russia has introduced a vaccine for limited use with very limited testing. It appears that some of this was a headline grab.  We will be watching to see how it does and hopefully it will work.
  • One of the frustrating elements of this virus is that we are all learning on the fly. There is a tendency to try to project facts off limited data.  One of the items that has been noted is that children, for the most part, seem to be less affected by COVID-19.  That isn’t to say all are safe from it, and it says nothing to the issue of carrying the virus to others.  The effects on children are critical to the reopening of schools.  A new datapoint seems to suggest that minority children may be at greater risk to the virus, which complicates the reopening issue.
  • A vaccine is the most likely path to normalization. This report highlights the difficulties in producing and distributing a vaccine once one is developed.

Market and Economic news:

  • The recent executive order about suspending the payroll tax is increasing uncertainty for businesses. Since the tax is only deferred, businesses are not sure if they should continue to collect it or give it to their workers only to take it back in a lump sum early next year.  This was clearly not the intent of the order, but it does show the difficulty of governing without legislation.
  • Yesterday, we noted that mortgage insurers were preparing to assess a new fee on refinancing.  The White House is criticizing the move.

View PDF


[1] Egypt was the most significant military threat to Israel; the normalization between Israel and Egypt meant that the former didn’t need to worry about its southern border and the latter could operate in the Sinai without risk.

Asset Allocation Weekly (August 14, 2020)

by Asset Allocation Committee | PDF

Precious metals prices have risen recently, making new highs.

(Source: Barchart.com)

This is a monthly chart for the nearest gold futures contract.  As the chart shows, we have recently moved above the 2011 highs.  In this report, we will discuss two areas that have supported this rise—the prevalence of negative real interest rates and a potential short squeeze on the futures market.

The Treasury Inflation Protected Securities (TIPS) are designed to provide protection against rising inflation.  The security has a component where its value rises when inflation increases.  It is possible to compare the Treasury yield relative to the TIPS yield to determine the “break-even” inflation rate; in other words, this is the market’s expectation of future inflation.

Note that the 10-year TIPS yield is now negative and the nominal yield on the 10-year T-note is mostly steady.  To some extent, this suggests the market believes the Fed is already engaging in yield curve control.  The combination of a falling real yield and a steady nominal yield means inflation expectations are rising.

These charts show there is a close relationship between the real 10-year yield and gold prices.  In fact, they correlate at the -88.9% level.

The second factor is a potential short squeeze in gold.

Recently, we have seen a rapid rise in gold delivery at the COMEX.  Perhaps the most sophisticated process of buying gold is to buy a futures contract and take delivery.  The buyer accepts a warehouse receipt at the COMEX exchange and pays a modest monthly fee for storage.  The holder of the warehouse receipt can then short the futures and deliver the warehouse receipt back into the market when they decide to sell their holdings.  This process solves a persistent problem for precious metals buyers—the transaction spread is narrow and the prices are fully transparent.  The drawback for most investors is the 100 oz contract at the COMEX, which is a commitment beyond that of the small investor.  Swap dealers who make markets between physical gold and the futures markets are not accustomed to this level of delivery and may have been caught short; if so, they will need to buy gold to deliver gold on their short positions.  That may account for the recent strength we have seen in the market.

View PDF