Author: Rebekah Stovall
Asset Allocation Weekly (July 16, 2021)
by the Asset Allocation Committee | PDF
The pandemic-related expanded benefits for the unemployed are expected to end in September. States that have ended the booster early have seen a sharper decline in initial claims than states that haven’t ended them. Although the end of enhanced employment benefits could help resolve the labor shortage, there is also the likelihood that it could lead to an increase in the unemployment rate. If this happens, this could force the Fed to rethink its decision regarding when to reduce its policy accommodation. In this report, we will discuss the possibility that the unemployment rate could rise and how it could impact monetary policy.
Currently, the labor market appears to be improving. National continuing jobless claims have fallen from an all-time high of 23 million in March 2020 to 3.5 million in June 2021. Additionally, during this time frame, the unemployment rate fell from 14.8% to 5.9%. The labor market has tightened so quickly over the last few months that firms have struggled to find workers to fill their open positions. However, this labor tightness is somewhat misleading. Continuing claims, currently at 3.3 million, remain well above the historical average of 2.8 million. In addition, employment has not recovered to its pre-pandemic peak. Finally, labor shortages remain especially bad in particular industries, most notably, Leisure and Hospitality and Transportation and Warehousing.
Since the start of 2020, many firms have been forced to limit their operating capacity to meet COVID-19 restriction guidelines. Firms, particularly in services, were forced to reduce the number of customers they could serve, limit their offerings, and, in some cases, temporarily shut down to comply with restrictions. As a result, there was a huge drop-off in hiring in the services sector at the start of the pandemic. Although the removal of restrictions led to a resurgence in hiring, the recovery was uneven.
As the recovery accelerated, firms began to rapidly increase hiring. Services related to tourism and travel, in particular, saw a spike in sales. Consumer expenditures on travel and airlines have doubled from the prior year. As a result, firms that found themselves understaffed began raising wages. When that didn’t work, states voluntarily withdrew from the extended unemployment benefits program to increase the size of the available workforce. Although somewhat successful, the initiative highlights the fact that there are still a lot of workers that haven’t committed to looking for work. Hence, when extended benefits end in September, it could lead to an increase in the number of unemployed people genuinely looking for work.
Although benefits recipients are technically required to look for work, some states have been lenient on enforcing it. Therefore, the end of extended benefits could lead to an increase in the civilian labor force, thus pushing up the unemployment rate. This is because the unemployment rate is calculated as a ratio of unemployed persons to the civilian labor force. The civilian labor force is defined as those working plus those who are unemployed but actively seeking employment. If those who are relying on the expanded benefits decide to join the labor force, ending expanded benefits may expand the labor force and usual frictional labor market issues may, at least temporarily, lead to a rise in the unemployment rate.
The timing of the expiration of the expanded benefits may also play a role. Many of the new jobs that have been added over the last five months have come from industries that are traditionally seasonal. For example, leisure and hospitality accounted for 60% of the jobs created in that period. For comparison purposes, the sector has accounted for 20% of the jobs created in the last decade. This problem becomes more apparent when you consider that a growing share of Leisure and Hospitality jobs are coming from Arts, Entertainment, and Recreation, a sector known for its seasonal swings. In other words, ending the expanded benefits could lead people back into the labor market at a time when firms are starting to slow their hiring.
In response to the June jobs report, St. Louis Federal Reserve President James Bullard suggested that the labor market may be tighter than it looks. Given Federal Reserve Chair Jerome Powell’s focus on full employment in guiding monetary policy, Bullard’s comments were regarded as rather hawkish. Thus, if the removal of the expanded benefits proves successful in bringing people back into the labor force, it could lead to a rise in the unemployment rate. Although we believe that a rise in the unemployment rate will likely be temporary, it may also slow down the drive to remove policy accommodation. Therefore, a rise in the unemployment rate could be favorable for risk assets.
Weekly Geopolitical Report – Unrest in Colombia (July 12, 2021)
by Patrick Fearon-Hernandez, CFA | PDF
When you find yourself surrounded by a squad of masked, black-clad fighters with their machine guns aimed at you, you can be pretty sure you’re about to have a bad day. The sense of foreboding was especially strong when this happened to me on a deserted road high up in the Colombian mountains, just after my jeep passed an abandoned one-room schoolhouse with “ELN Vive” spray painted on its wall, announcing that one of Colombia’s main rebel groups was active in the area. My only other feeling at the time was consternation: When my Colombian wife had talked me into letting her take our two young sons to spend the summer at her family’s coffee plantation outside the city of Manizales, she had assured me that it was perfectly safe. I was now on my way to pick them up and bring them home from this supposedly safe mountainside. As I watched the gunmen approaching my jeep, I realized that “safe” is a relative term for Colombians.
Once the soldiers had emerged out of the tall grass along the road and made my driver stop, their leader walked up and motioned for me to surrender my passport. In situations like this, the moment you hand over a U.S. passport is the moment you start to feel like you have a bullseye painted on your back. But as he examined mine, it gave me time to look more closely at the fighters. Their uniforms were all brand new and of the finest quality, including their Kevlar helmets. Their M16 rifles were so new they didn’t have a single scuff on them. The commander handed back my passport, assured me his squad would be patrolling nearby if my family needed help, and motioned me onward. I had just been rescued by Colombian solders trained and equipped by the U.S. Department of Defense under the “Plan Colombia” aid program.
Asset Allocation Weekly – #44 (Posted 7/9/21)
Asset Allocation Weekly (July 9, 2021)
by the Asset Allocation Committee | PDF
In our report from June 25, we discussed the data from the Financial Accounts of the U.S., otherwise known by its original name, the Flow of Funds Report. There is a section of the report that comes out a couple weeks after the initial release known as the Distributional Financial Accounts of the U.S. This second dataset provides a balance sheet by wealth percentile. In other words, it provides the breakdown of assets, liabilities, and net worth by the top 1% of households, the next 9%, the middle 40%, and the bottom 50%. For the most part, we aggregate the top 1% and the next 9% in our analysis.
In the earlier report, we noted that household saving has risen dramatically due to government transfer payments. This report gives us an indication of who is holding the cash.[1]
Over the past year, cash holdings of the top 10% are up $161,000. Holdings of the middle 40% are up $14,962, while that of the bottom 10% are up $2,051. Although there have been large government transfers, targeted to the bottom 90%, most of the additional liquidity is in the hands of higher income households.
Net worth rose across all household categories.
Over the past year, the top 10% saw their net worth rise by $1.4 million. The middle 40% increased by $101,090, and the bottom 50% rose by $10,786.
Finally, in terms of liabilities relative to cash, the bottom 50% are steadily deleveraging.
This chart shows a macro form of the cash ratio. Currently, the bottom 50% liabilities exceed cash by 8.8x. The ratio for the middle 40% is 1.3x and it is 0.4x for the top 10%. The key point of this chart is that the bottom 50% have been deleveraging since the Great Financial Crisis.
These three charts are sending a similar message, which is that the distribution of cash and assets does not support sustained inflation. We would need to see more liquidity and assets held in the middle and bottom income brackets, but most of the liquidity is held by the top 10% of households. They are less likely to use it to buy goods and services and more likely to invest. With regard to the third chart, it’s always difficult to know when a household reaches a point where it is comfortable with its debt levels and wants to borrow again. Current levels are consistent with values from 1995 to 2000. However, we note that in the early 1990s, a ratio of 6x was normal. If this group of households decides to further reduce its debt, the chances of this liquidity feeding a reflation would be further reduced.
[1] We define cash as currency and near-cash equivalents, e.g., bank deposits, money market funds, and cash held in pensions.
Confluence of Ideas – #22 “The Geopolitics of Taiwan and the Issue of Globalization” (Posted 7/7/21)
Daily Comment (July 2, 2021)
by Bill O’Grady, Thomas Wash, and Patrick Fearon-Hernandez, CFA
[Posted: 9:30 AM EDT] | PDF
Good morning, all! U.S. equities appear to be headed for a higher open this morning. Today’s Comment begins with a discussion about Chinese President Xi Jinping’s speech. International news follows, with an update on the global minimum tax proposal and the EU’s decision to end caged farming. U.S. Economics and policy news are next, including an update on the infrastructure package. China news follows, and we end with our pandemic coverage.
China will not be bullied: Thursday marked the 100-year anniversary of the Chinese Communist Party. During the celebration, President Xi gave a speech that alluded to a possible war over Taiwan. In the speech, he stated that an attempt by “foreign forces” to bully China would result in “heads bashed bloody against a Great Wall of steel forged by 1.4 billion Chinese people.” He went on to pledge that China would regain full control over Taiwan. The speech comes within weeks of China flying fighter jets and bombers through Taiwan’s air space.
His latest remarks were in steep contrast with comments he made to diplomats a month ago. In June, Xi advised officials to create a “trustworthy, lovable and respectable” image of the country abroad. So far, markets have not responded well to the sudden change in tone. We note that investors sold Chinese equities in the wake of Xi’s speech. Although the sell-off may be short-lived, as China’s economy appears to be stable, the probability of war between the West and China, though remote, is elevated.
On Wednesday, Japanese officials warned that Russia and China were coordinating military exercises to threaten not only Taiwan but also Hawaii. Although simulated attacks are quite common during military exercises, it shows that as China ramps up its rhetoric about a possible takeover of Taiwan, it is also preparing for a U.S. response. The U.S. and Japan, who have also been coordinating military exercises, appear to be growing more concerned about the increase in China’s assertiveness over the last few years. Although it appears Japan will likely retaliate if China follows through on its threat to invade Taiwan, the U.S. has been noticeably ambiguous on the matter. President Biden himself appears to be conflicted. People within his administration, such as Secretary of State Antony Blinken, would likely support a retaliation. In the past, Blinken has argued that the U.S. shouldn’t shy away from its role as hegemon and was once quoted as saying “superpowers don’t bluff.” However, it doesn’t appear that Biden believes he could persuade the American public to back a war with China over Taiwan. A survey conducted by the Chicago Council on Global Affairs shows that if China invaded Taiwan, only 41% of Americans would support a U.S. military response. The lack of support could make retaliation politically risky, and given the blowback Biden received after supporting the invasion of Iraq, he may be keen to play it safe.
One of the biggest takeaways from Xi’s speech is that the U.S.-China decoupling appears to be inevitable. Given the rise in tensions, the U.S. has taken a tougher stance against China and some of its labor practices. Earlier this year, the U.S. issued sanctions against China in response to allegations of forced labor being used in Xinjiang cotton fields. Although U.S. companies issued statements expressing their concerns about the use of forced labor, it doesn’t appear that these companies were willing to sever ties with China over the matter. During a call with Wall Street analysts, Nike (NKE, $158.00) CEO John Donahue claimed that “Nike is a brand that is of China and for China.” In response, Commerce Secretary Gina Raimondo hinted that U.S. companies should take a more active role in speaking out against human rights violations. Although we don’t expect laws to deter companies from working with China to be forthcoming, we are starting to see this administration hint that companies may want to consider other options first.
International news: Protests in Myanmar, support for a global minimum tax, and a ban on raising farm animals in cages.
- Since taking power in February, the Myanmar army has struggled to contain the nationwide protests. On Thursday, protesters set fire to army uniforms and chanted pro-democracy hymns.
- Over 130 countries have signed on to the 15% global minimum corporate tax on multinational corporations. Following heavy lobbying by the U.S., all G20 countries have backed the plan. There are a few holdouts, including Ireland, who claimed that it isn’t in a position to back the proposal. Ireland’s corporate tax rate is 12.5%.
- Venezuela is preparing to slash six zeroes from the bolivar, its national currency, as the country has struggled to contain the rampant inflation. Although the country has adopted the dollar for many of its transactions, the bolivar is still needed for everyday items such as bus fare.
- The European Union has decided to back a ban on raising farm animals in cages. The new regulation is expected to be introduced in 2023 and will likely not be put into place until 2027.
Economics and policy: The House passes a spending bill, the International Monetary Fund revises U.S. growth expectations, and U.S. plains maintain air strike capabilities in Afghanistan.
- On Thursday, the House passed a bill that would approve $715 billion of spending on transportation and drinking water. The bill would likely need to meld with the infrastructure deal struck by a bipartisan group of Senators.
- The Biden Administration warned 17 countries for not doing enough to combat human trafficking. The list included major countries, such as Russia, Iran, and China. Failing to act on human trafficking could result in sanctions.
- The Congressional Budget Office (CBO) projected that the U.S. deficit would expand to $3 trillion in 2021 and average $1 trillion over the next ten years. This deficit reached its second-highest level since 1945.
- The International Monetary Fund raised its U.S. growth projections to 7.0% in 2021, up from 4.6%. The projection assumes that Congress passes the infrastructure spending bill. The supranational organization also stated that the Fed would likely need to raise rates by late 2022 or early 2023, as it believes spending will keep inflation above its long-term trajectory.
- The Federal Trade Commission has announced it will begin to crack down on companies that inaccurately use the “Made in the U.S.A.” Violators will be fined as much as $43,280.
- The U.S. plans to keep airstrike capabilities in Afghanistan following its withdrawal from the country. The U.S. will keep some of its troops and artillery at the Hamid Karzai International Airport in Kabul. The U.S. decision to maintain airstrike capabilities within the region is in response to an increase in attacks and reports that the government could fall within six months of its withdrawal.
China: Students are harassed, and there’s a change in electricity prices
- Pro-democracy Chinese students who are attending Australian universities have been harassed and threatened by the Chinese government.
- In response to declining utilization rates at coal-fired plants, Chinese state planners have decided to change the way it sets residential electricity prices. The change will make household electricity more expensive.
COVID-19: The number of reported cases is 182,653,642 with 3,955,835 fatalities. In the U.S., there are 33,679,489 confirmed cases with 605,019 deaths. For illustration purposes, the FT has created an interactive chart that allows one to compare cases across nations using similar scaling metrics. The FT has also issued an economic tracker that looks across countries with high-frequency data on various factors. The CDC reports that 382,283,990 doses of the vaccine have been distributed, with 328,152,304 doses injected. The number receiving at least one dose is 181,339,416, while the number of second doses, which would grant the highest level of immunity, is 155,884,601. The FT has a page on global vaccine distribution.
- A new mass testing technique has improved the efficiency of COVID testing. In a paper published in Nature Biotechnology, this new technique can detect about 100 times lower amounts of the virus than the traditional test. The new method should help pave the way for school reopening in the fall.
- The digital COVID-19 certification went into effect in the European Union on Thursday. The certificate allows for people who have received vaccines made by Pfizer-BioNTech (PFE, $39.48), Moderna (MRNA, $234.73), Johnson & Johnson (JNJ,$165.50 ), and AstraZeneca(AZN, $60.30) to travel throughout the bloc without restrictions.
- Although the Delta variant has emerged as the dominant strain in England, it has not led to a surge in hospitalizations. This is a welcoming sign as there have been growing fears the variants could be immune to vaccines.
- The World Health Organization has stated that gatherings to watch the UEFA EURO 2020 in stadiums and bars contribute to the increase in infections. Although this is an unwelcome sign, we would like to remind our clients that it is safe to root for “La Roja” from the comfort of their own homes.
The Biden Administration will send “surge teams” to communities with low vaccination rates to help combat the spread of the Delta variant of the coronavirus.
Asset Allocation Weekly (July 2, 2021)
by the Asset Allocation Committee | PDF
(Due to the Independence Day holiday, there will not be an accompanying podcast and chart book this week. The multimedia offerings associated with this report will resume next week, July 9.)
The Wall Street Journal Dollar Index, which tracks the dollar’s value relative to seven major currencies, has fallen nearly 10% since March 2020. Generally, when the dollar weakens it leads to an increase in the price of U.S. imports and a decrease in the price of U.S. exports. The drop in export prices may be good for U.S. exporters in the long term, but the rise in import prices may have a negative impact on consumers. For example, the recent rise in gasoline prices can at least be partially explained by the depreciation in the dollar. The rise in import prices has posed a dilemma for many U.S. firms that rely on imports. They can choose to raise prices and risk losing market share or they can maintain prices and accept smaller profit margins. In this report, we discuss how a weaker dollar may contribute to inflationary pressures.
Most trade is contracted and settled in U.S. dollars. As a result, it is relatively easy for Americans to purchase foreign goods and services from abroad. In the year ended in March, the value of imported consumer goods, automobiles, and food and beverage was equivalent to more than a quarter of all U.S. consumption spending. That being said, this dynamic does not always favor U.S. trade partners. Because trades are primarily transacted in U.S. dollars, exporters to the U.S. bear most of the currency risk. This is especially true in the initial stages of currency depreciation as contracts prevent foreign exporters from adjusting their prices in response to the weakening dollar. Exporters are initially forced to absorb the currency depreciation through narrower profit margins, all else being equal. As sales are implemented over time, however, the foreign exporters are able to adjust their prices. In other words, import prices are sticky in the short-run but flexible in the long-run. The impact currency has on trade can be seen in changes to a country’s balance of trade.
In the initial stages of currency depreciation, U.S. importers are incentivized to buy more goods and services before the contract ends, thus leading to an increase in imports. At the same time, U.S. exports remain stable as it takes time for firms to expand production to meet the new demand. The trade balance therefore tends to weaken. Over time, however, the decline in the trade balance reverses as consumers find alternatives to the more expensive imports and exporters are able to expand their capacity to meet the increase of foreign demand. The initial decline followed by an upward swing in the trade balance is referred to as the J-curve effect.
Despite the correlation between the dollar and import prices, firms don’t always have the leeway to push the adjustment onto consumers. During the Great Recession of 2008-2009 and the period immediately following, merchandise import prices significantly outpaced the rise in consumer prices. The discrepancy is possibly related to economic conditions. In the months leading up to the recession, there weren’t many signs of significant supply chain disruptions. As a result, many firms were hesitant to push the increase in import prices onto their consumers out of fear of losing market share. Today, that isn’t the case. Supply chain disruptions and strong demand due to post-pandemic reopenings have made it easier for firms to push the rise in import prices onto their consumers. As a result, the rise in consumer prices closely matches the rise in import prices.
Although we are confident that the dollar’s depreciation has contributed to the rise in inflation, we still believe supply shortages and stronger demand are the primary drivers. However, if we are wrong, this would likely mean that elevated levels of inflation may be around longer than we have anticipated. In this case, the Fed would likely be forced to raise rates earlier than it has forecast, which would be bullish for the dollar and bearish for commodities.
Business Cycle Report (June 30, 2021)
by Thomas Wash | PDF
The business cycle has a major impact on financial markets; recessions usually accompany bear markets in equities. The intention of this report is to keep our readers apprised of the potential for recession, updated on a monthly basis. Although it isn’t the final word on our views about recession, it is part of our process in signaling the potential for a downturn.
In May, the diffusion index rose further above the recession indicator, signaling that the recovery continues. In the financial markets, a sharp rise in inflation expectations led to a modest sell-off in equities in the middle of the month. Meanwhile, construction and manufacturing activity slowed as increasing costs for materials are becoming a problem for homebuilders and factories. Lastly, the labor market showed signs of strengthening as hiring increased and the unemployment rate dropped. As a result, eight out of the 11 indicators are in expansion territory. The diffusion index rose from +0.333 to +0.3939, above the recession signal of +0.2500.
The chart above shows the Confluence Diffusion Index. It uses a three-month moving average of 11 leading indicators to track the state of the business cycle. The red line signals when the business cycle is headed toward a contraction, while the blue line signals when the business cycle is headed toward a recovery. On average, the diffusion index is currently providing about six months of lead time for a contraction and five months of lead time for a recovery. Continue reading for a more in-depth understanding of how the indicators are performing and refer to our Glossary of Charts at the back of this report for a description of each chart and what it measures. A chart title listed in red indicates that indicator is signaling recession.