Weekly Geopolitical Report – “Catalonia, a New State within Europe”? (October 12, 2015)

by Kaisa Stucke, CFA

“Catalonia, a new state within Europe” is the slogan of the pro-independence secession movement in the Spanish region of Catalonia.  Catalonia has always pined for more autonomy, but calls for secession have intensified as the Spanish economy has suffered from slow growth and corruption scandals have discredited the central government.  At the end of September, Catalonia held regional parliamentary elections.  These elections were touted by some as a prelude to Catalan secession from Spain.  However, the Spanish federal government has made it clear that it will not hold negotiations for secession and, in fact, even holding an independence referendum is considered unconstitutional.  Although the majority of Catalans support independence, they could likely be appeased with more autonomy, especially financial autonomy.

This week, we will look at the separatist movement in Catalonia.  We will start by giving a brief overview of the region’s history and politics, then look at the roots of the independence movement.  We will explore the probability of independence, the potential future relationship between the region and the central government, and the roles of the EU and the Eurozone.  As always, we will conclude with market ramifications.

View the full report

Keller Quarterly (October 2015)

Letter to Investors

Back before talk radio became the domain of either political opinionates or “shock talkers,” it was dominated by the friendly conversation of morning humorists in the path established by Arthur Godfrey.  Here in St. Louis, a very funny fellow named Jack Carney dominated the airwaves in the mid-morning for a generation.  At least a quarter of all the radios in the area were tuned in to his show during his time slot, ratings current radio execs can only dream of.  One of his recurring call-in guests was an elderly woman named “Miss Blue.”  She and Jack engaged in funny chit-chat that always began and ended with her pronouncing (in a delightful Southern accent) that, “Aaw-ll is way-ll!” You just had to smile when she said it.  I think of her when I field calls from agitated friends who are concerned that the world is falling apart.  I just want to tell them that, “All is well,” and have it calm them in the way that Miss Blue did.

Of course, people won’t believe that all is well, which, of course, it never is.  But all is rarely on the verge of doom either, even though these days that’s what many people seem to think.  We are always wrestling with a number of difficult problems in the world economy; the trick is to identify the ones that really matter.  Only rarely do the ones that the “talking heads” fixate on really matter to your portfolio.  In a nutshell, here are the problems that I think really matter:

  1. The level of U.S. consumer debt is still relatively high (though down quite a bit from seven years ago), leading to low levels of consumer spending and, hence, slow growth in the U.S. economy. These phenomena won’t change anytime soon.
  2. China and the emerging markets are seeing their growth decelerate at alarming rates, simply because the U.S. is not buying as much of their goods as it used to. China, in particular, is trying to transition to a more sustainable consumer-oriented economy, but this transition will take a very long while and will probably stumble a few times.  These phenomena will probably get worse before they get better.
  3. Our Federal Reserve seems determined to raise short-term interest rates, even though we see no inflation problem coming and believe there is a fair amount of “slack” in our economy. I was glad to see them postpone the rate increase last month and hope they keep postponing it.  This question of Fed policy will remain with us for quite a while.

Problem #1 has been with us for a long time, so we’ve learned to deal with it.  Slow growth is no fun but, like getting old, it beats the alternative.  Problem #2 will continue to trouble us, but because we buy a lot more from the developing world than we sell to them, their problems will generally not be imported to us.  We are embarking on a time, I believe, when the emerging markets’ economies will be worse than ours.  Finally, problem #3 is the one we should worry about the most.  Although they are well-meaning people, the Fed’s Open Market Committee has sometimes done harm by setting the wrong policy at the wrong time.  We are encouraged that they are still waiting to raise rates.

As I noted in last quarter’s letter, investment conditions in the U.S. really are much better than the rest of the world.  Particularly after the recent decline in equity prices, U.S. stocks are more reasonably priced than we’ve seen in a while. It appears to me that the investor pessimism is considerably “over-shooting” the reality of the situation.  In other words, I think the investment outlook is much better than it “feels,” even if it’s not quite as good as Miss Blue would say.

Thank you for your confidence in us.

 

Gratefully,

Mark A. Keller, CFA
CEO and Chief Investment Officer

View the PDF

Weekly Geopolitical Report – Putin and Syria (October 5, 2015)

by Bill O’Grady

Last month, Russia moved a significant amount of military hardware into areas of Syria controlled by the Assad regime.  The action caught the Obama administration by surprise and raises questions about what Russian President Putin is trying to accomplish.

In this report, we will examine Russia’s short-term geostrategic goals and the tactics Putin is using to achieve these aims.  As always, we will conclude with potential market ramifications.

View the full report

Weekly Geopolitical Report – El Niño Update (September 28, 2015)

by Kaisa Stucke, CFA

Meteorologists have been calling for an El Niño event since last year.  Current forecasts place the likelihood of an El Niño occurrence this winter at over 90%.  Now, talk has turned from the likelihood of an El Niño to whether the abnormal weather pattern event will be super-sized or monster-sized.  Water temperatures in the Pacific, one of the first signs of a looming El Niño, have measured much higher than normal.  In fact, water temperatures have been on par with the most severe El Niño event from the past 30 years.  As investors, we monitor larger climate events as severe weather can have an effect on most commodity markets.

This week, we will look at how an El Niño develops and its possible climate, economic and geopolitical effects on the global economy.  As always, we will outline the potential investment implications of this event.

View the full report

Weekly Geopolitical Report – Meet Jeremy Corbyn (September 21, 2015)

by Bill O’Grady

On September 12th, Jeremy Corbyn, a longtime Member of Parliament (MP), was elected as the new leader of the U.K.’s Labour Party.  When he announced he would run in June, his candidacy for the position appeared laughable, but by the time the party election was held it was clear that Corbyn would win.  Corbyn was considered a fringe member of the Labour Party; he has never controlled a major mandate (e.g., Exchequer, Defense, etc.) or held any position of responsibility in the party.

In this report, we will begin with a short biography of Corbyn followed by a description of how he won his party’s leadership role.  With this background, we will explore Corbyn’s long held policy positions and their potential impact on U.K. policy.  We will offer our reflections on Corbyn’s win, including an examination within the context of other political developments in the West.  As always, we will conclude with potential market ramifications.

View the full report

Quarterly Energy Comment (September 3, 2015)

by Bill O’Grady

The Market

Over the past year, oil prices fell sharply into the first quarter, remained rangebound from January through March, rallied above $60 per barrel in the spring and early summer, and then slid to new lows in August.  Recently, we have seen a sharp bounce in prices; in fact, it is the fastest recovery since August 1990, when Saddam Hussein invaded Kuwait.

(Source: Barchart.com)

The decline from late June into late August is probably discounting the normal seasonal demand weakness that occurs after the summer ends.  Refineries usually engage in extended maintenance during autumn which reduces oil demand.  The recent rally looks like aggressive short covering.  The sub-$40 lows will probably hold as the lower end of the trading range into early winter.  From there, we would look for a retest of the upper end of the range.  It is always important to remember that cartel markets tend toward trading ranges as the supply behaviors lead to price stability.  We are probably entering a $60 to $40 dollar trading range.  Could we break down below this range?  Yes, because it isn’t clear that OPEC will take steps to defend that level.  However, some of the recent rally was due to rumors that OPEC was considering steps to support the market.  Around $40 dollars, demand would be expected to improve.  So, for now, our stance is that we are creating a price range and until we see strong evidence to the contrary, we expect it to hold.

View the complete PDF

Weekly Geopolitical Report – Bremmer’s Choices (August 31, 2015)

by Bill O’Grady

Last week, we wrote our first formal book review as a Weekly Geopolitical Report.  The book, Superpower: Three Choices for America’s Role in the World, is a recently published book by Ian Bremmer in which he discusses three models for American foreign policy.  In our closing comments last week, we promised to take a deeper look at Bremmer’s three foreign policy models to examine their costs and benefits.  In this report, we will analyze his three models of exercising the superpower role, Indispensable America, Independent America and Moneyball America.  From this analysis, we will discuss which model is the most likely choice.  As always, we will conclude with market ramifications.

View the full report

Weekly Geopolitical Report – Book Review: Superpower (August 24, 2015)

by Bill O’Grady

This is the first formal book review we have conducted as a Weekly Geopolitical Report, although we have leaned heavily on books or papers for much of the content in other reports.  We believe this book is important because of its message and due to the proximity to the 2016 elections.

Our subject this week is a new book titled Superpower: Three Choices for America’s Role in the World, by Ian Bremmer of the Eurasian Group.[1]  Bremmer is a well-known political scientist and author who writes often about geopolitical issues.  His new book comes at an important juncture in American history.  At some point, America’s leadership will need to select a workable foreign policy for the post-Cold War world, which involves determining what America will do about the superpower role.  This is a topic we discuss often and, after reading this book, view Bremmer’s analysis as critically important in the examination of America’s foreign policy.  In this report, we will review Bremmer’s book, starting with his premise that none of the presidents since the fall of the Berlin Wall have developed a coherent foreign policy.  We will then focus on his three models of exercising the superpower role.  From this analysis, we will examine Bremmer’s choice in the matter and offer a critical assessment of his opinion.  As always, we will conclude with market ramifications.

View the full report

____________________

[1] Bremmer, Ian. (2015). Superpower: Three Choices for America’s Role in the World. New York, NY: Penguin Publishing, Random House.

Weekly Geopolitical Report – Donald and Bernie (August 17, 2015)

by Bill O’Grady

In the spring of 2014, we wrote a series of Weekly Geopolitical Reports that looked at the 2016 elections.  In these reports, we described the economic and political environment that had the potential to make the 2016 election historically important.  The emergence and remarkable staying power of Donald Trump and Bernie Sanders suggests that our earlier analysis and conclusions may be coming to pass.

In this report, we will recap the economic and political factors that led us to conclude last year that the next presidential cycle could be unusually significant.  From there, we will look at the unlikely rise of Donald Trump and Bernie Sanders and what their success thus far signals about the electorate and the next presidential election.  Finally, we will analyze their potential impact on the election, including the possibility that each might mount an extra-party candidacy.  As always, we will conclude with market ramifications.

View the full report