Asset Allocation Quarterly (Third Quarter 2016)

  • The U.S. economy is likely to remain in its low-growth trend and we don’t foresee a recession, given that the Fed has become less inclined to raise rates.
  • Brexit should be largely transitory for Britain, but may reveal a variety of weaknesses within the European Union.
  • The U.S. presidential elections reveal a myriad of changing views within the population. Changing policies in Washington will be important to monitor.
  • Domestic equities, diversified across capitalization sizes, maintain the lion’s share of stock allocations. Our view toward equities remains generally positive, although we expect moderate returns, absent easy policy from the Fed. Our style bias remains in favor of growth at 60/40.
  • We believe slow economic growth and low inflation, along with low global interest rates and high geopolitical risk, will keep U.S. interest rates near current levels.
  • We introduce a commodity allocation this quarter, utilizing gold. We believe gold can help address risks related to global central bank policies.

ECONOMIC VIEWPOINTS

Although U.S economic growth remains far below its long-term average, the economy continues to move forward in one of the longest expansions in modern history. The stability of the economy, more so than inflation or the strength of the labor markets, compelled the Fed to begin raising rates last December. However, with domestic economic data indicating potential pockets of instability, along with Britain’s decision to exit the European Union (Brexit), the Fed has recognized there is enough uncertainty to put further rate hikes on hold. We believe this decision is a good one, and absent future Fed policy errors we do not foresee a recession at this point in time.

Equity and bond markets around the world were shocked with the British vote to leave the EU. Equities became volatile, while bond yields in developed countries continued to decline. In our view, Brexit may create some near-term uncertainty for the British economy, but we expect the problems to be mostly transitory. The British economy will benefit from rising exports as a result of the weak British pound. Furthermore, the Bank of England has telegraphed its intention to help address uncertainty in the country’s financial system. For these reasons, we believe Britain will work its way through its departure from the EU.

However, for the rest of the EU, Brexit opens a Pandora’s Box of potential problems. On the immediate horizon, the uncertainty is likely to slow already low levels of economic growth. Germany is particularly dependent upon exports, including those to Britain. Perhaps more important is the weakness of the Italian banking system. Like many other peripheral EU countries, Italy has yet to address the billions of euros of bad loans dating back to the 2008 financial crisis. Policies thus far have generally been Band-Aids that only defer problems rather than fix them. Brexit may bring these problems to the forefront, along with the EU’s limited political cohesion and inability to address conditions in a consistent manner. Accordingly, one of the longer term risks we see from Brexit is the potential for the EU to begin unravelling.

We have long held an overwhelming domestic bias in our portfolios, recognizing weak foreign growth and elevated levels of geopolitical risk. This posture has helped insulate portfolios from risks like Brexit; however, we recognize that global markets and economies have become increasingly interconnected. If Britain or the EU were to dip into recession, this could cause the U.S. economy to grow even slower. Still, we believe the U.S. economy is likely to prove itself as the strongest one standing among developed countries.

Of course, it is a presidential election year and it’s important to acknowledge the changes taking place in Washington. For investors, it’s important to remember that Fed Chair Yellen is likely to have a much more immediate impact on portfolios than either Clinton or Trump. Still, the political forces at work reveal changing views within the country. Many of the same issues that elevated Trump also buoyed Sanders. So, whether our next president is Trump or Clinton, the issues themselves will remain. These include policy changes related to trade, taxation, immigration and income inequality, to name a few. Policy changes take time to work through the political process but, as Washington adjusts, we will carefully monitor the trends, which will affect our views toward issues including inflation, productivity, growth and valuations.

STOCK MARKET OUTLOOK

We find it ironic that even as the Fed has embarked on a policy to raise short-term interest rates, the result has actually been lower long-term rates. One could argue that the Fed’s recent policies have been an amalgamation of unintended consequences. Nevertheless, one fairly consistent outcome of Fed policy over the past few years has been the relationship between easier monetary policy and rising equity valuations. We saw a pretty clear relationship during the three rounds of Quantitative Easing (2009-2014), and we have seen it again this year in February and June, when the Fed clarified a slowing path for raising rates. For equity investors, this indicates higher potential return when the Fed chooses a path of easy monetary policy, which is a possibility going forward. Absent help from the Fed, we believe equity returns are likely to be moderate. Earnings growth remains low, while valuations are somewhat elevated. This profile isn’t necessarily negative, but we believe equity investors should temper their expectations for returns over the next several quarters.

Except for a relatively small allocation in our most aggressive portfolio, our equity allocations remain entirely domestic. Our economic viewpoint toward Europe reflects a much weaker growth environment than that of the U.S. In addition, we believe Japan is likely to struggle, and perhaps enter recession, as the yen strengthens and harms Japanese exports. Within the U.S. equity allocations, we remain diversified across capitalization sizes. For large cap allocations, we are overweight technology, energy and consumer discretionary. We have a particular emphasis in energy that adds exposure to crude oil prices, which have the potential to increase as U.S. production declines and global geopolitical risks remains elevated. We are underweight financials, healthcare, utilities and telecom. Our style bias remains in favor of growth over value (60/40).

BOND MARKET OUTLOOK

Interest rates around the world remain historically low and rates are actually negative across a wide range of maturities in many countries. Low and negative rates reflect a variety of factors, including weak global economies, disinflation, aggressive central bank policies, enormous liquidity and investor risk aversion. So, even as U.S. rates are also historically low, domestic bond yields are actually pretty high relative to many other developed countries.

We continue to include a range of different maturities in our bond allocations. One important benefit that bonds have provided over the past several quarters is diversification. Oftentimes when equity markets decline, bond prices surge, particularly for longer maturity Treasuries. The inclusion of longer maturities has benefited portfolios and we continue to include them. Our allocations include corporate bonds as well as U.S. Treasuries.

OTHER MARKETS

We continue to believe real estate can play a constructive role in portfolios, particularly where income is an objective. Although this asset class has become increasingly similar to equities, and its diversification benefits are now more limited, we believe strong fundamentals can continue to benefit investors. Valuations are high for certain industries, but we believe an attractive return/risk tradeoff is available when factoring in low interest rates and strong foreign capital flows.

This quarter we introduce a commodity allocation, which is something we have avoided for many quarters. After several years of poor performance, commodities have provided some of the highest returns this year. We have concerns that low or declining global growth may cause commodity prices to turn lower; however, we believe gold provides ballast to the risks central bankers are creating with negative interest rate policies. Gold can also provide a safe haven during periods of elevated geopolitical and currency risks.

View the complete PDF

Weekly Geopolitical Report – Meet Theresa May (July 18, 2016)

by Bill O’Grady

On Monday, July 11, U.K. Energy Minister Andrea Leadsom withdrew from the race for prime minister.  The Tories decided to end the leadership contest with Leadsom’s exit, giving the PM job to Theresa May.  She officially took over the role on Wednesday, July 13.

In this report, we will begin with a discussion of how she won.  We will offer a short biography of May, focusing on her accomplishments, temperament and leadership style.  We will also discuss her mandate and the odds of early elections.  As always, we will conclude with the potential impact on markets.

View the full report

Daily Comment (July 18, 2016)

by Bill O’Grady and Kaisa Stucke

[Posted: 9:30 AM EDT] The big weekend news was the failed coup in Turkey.  Late Friday, news began to emerge of unusual troop movements within the country.  By evening, it was clear that a full-blown coup attempt was underway.  President Erdogan issued a statement to his followers via FaceTime to resist the coup plotters.  Although the gesture seemed rather pathetic at the time, the action does appear to have turned the tide against the coup.  By nightfall in the West, it had become apparent that the coup plotters had failed, although bloodshed continued for several hours.  Once Erdogan flew to Istanbul, the government was in control of the situation.

These charts show the reaction within the Turkish financial markets.

(Source: Bloomberg)

This chart shows the TRY/USD exchange rate on an inverted scale.  Note that the Turkish lira plunged on the news but has regained about half of its losses.

Turkish equities show a similar pattern.

(Source: Bloomberg)

This is a six-month daily candlestick chart.  Note that equities had been rallying into the event.  They have sold off hard today and are trading near the lows.  Even though the coup failed, it is unclear how far Erdogan will go in reaction to the coup.  This will be a topic of an upcoming WGR.  Nevertheless, the point is that the dragnet appears unusually wide; in fact, if the conspiracy was as wide as the arrests indicate, it is unfathomable how operational secrecy was maintained.  It appears that Erdogan is going to use this event to eliminate as many opponents as possible.  If a widespread purge follows the coup, it won’t be good for Turkish financial assets.

The other quiet event that occurred in the wake of the Turkish coup was that the PBOC used the cover of events to further depreciate the CNY.

(Source: Bloomberg)

This chart shows the CNY/USD exchange rate, inverted, over the past year.  After last August’s devaluation, China has been following a “stair step” approach to depreciate its currency, with periods of pushing the rate lower followed by consolidation.  It is becoming clear that China is trying to use a weaker currency to stimulate its economy.  This action will tend to export deflation to the rest of the world and is supportive of further declines in long-term interest rates.

Overall, the failed coup’s broader market impact appears rather modest but it does highlight the underlying risks of emerging market investing.  The bigger market impact may be felt in the aftermath of the coup as the purge has the potential to turn Turkey into an authoritarian regime.  Its relationship with NATO and its role in stabilizing the Middle East are now under question.

View the complete PDF

Daily Comment (July 15, 2016)

by Bill O’Grady and Kaisa Stucke

[Posted: 9:30 AM EDT] There were two major news items overnight, the Nice terrorist attack and China’s GDP.  News reports indicate that there were 84 deaths from a terrorist attack in Nice, France.  The attacker, identified as Mohamed Lahouaiej Bouhlel, a French passport holder of Tunisian descent, used a 19 tonne truck to drive into a crowd celebrating Bastille Day on the French Riviera.  Not too much is known about the assailant; he appears to be a petty criminal but was not on any terrorist watch lists.  There have been reports that IS has been actively recruiting criminals of Middle Eastern origin living in Europe.  These recruits are often not overtly religious but seem attracted to the violent nature of IS.[1]  Neighbors of Bouhlel report that he did not appear religious.  He was married with three children but, according to reports, his marriage was estranged.  President Hollande asked the French legislature to extend the state of emergency for three more months; it was due to expire.

Terror attacks such as these are nearly impossible to stop.  Normal reasoning would look for patterns, trying to create a profile that might inform when the next attack may be coming.  However, that doesn’t seem to work; after all, if small-time criminals can suddenly turn into terrorists, there is no clear way to figure out the difference.  The longer this goes on the more likely it is that the public will demand protection, which may mean that anyone with a certain religious background with a criminal record will come under increased scrutiny and surveillance, at a minimum.  The increase in fear will almost certainly have a political effect; we will be watching closely to see if Le Pen’s National Front poll numbers improve in the coming weeks.  On the other hand, the financial markets have become so inured to these events that there is scant evidence of an effect on todays’ trade.

China’s Q2 GDP rose 6.7% from last year, a bit better than the 6.6% expected.  The data is (not surprisingly) in line with government growth targets.  The rise in credit has lifted GDP at the risk of increasing non-performing loans in the future.

(Source: Bloomberg)

This chart shows that private investment continues to fall; essentially, the government was able to meet its goals by boosting public investment.  Property investment is up 6.1% YTD compared to the same period last year.  It is unclear if another rise in real estate activity is a good long-term plan.  The good news of the data is that the Chinese economy isn’t in imminent danger.  The bad news is that it is likely creating future debt problems that could be serious in order to avoid problems now.

With the release of CPI data, we can tentatively update our versions of the Mankiw rule model.  This model attempts to determine the neutral rate for fed funds, which is a rate that is neither accommodative nor stimulative.  Mankiw’s model is a variation of the Taylor Rule.  The latter measures the neutral rate using core CPI and the difference between GDP and potential GDP, which is an estimate of slack in the economy.  Potential GDP cannot be directly observed, only estimated.  To overcome this problem with potential GDP, Mankiw used the unemployment rate as a proxy for economic slack.  We have created three versions of the rule, one that follows the original construction by using the unemployment rate as a measure of slack, a second that uses the employment/population ratio and a third using involuntary part-time workers as a percentage of the total labor force.

Using the unemployment rate, the neutral rate is now up to 3.93%, suggesting the FOMC is well behind the curve.  Using the employment/population ratio, the neutral rate is 1.31%, indicating that, even using the most dovish variation, the FOMC needs a rate hike of at least 75 to 100 bps to achieve neutral policy.  Finally, using involuntary part-time employment, the neutral rate is 2.54%.  Currently, fed funds futures place the odds of a September hike at 21%.  A probability in excess of 50% isn’t seen until June 2017.  We had three Fed speakers yesterday; none suggested a rate was required in the near term.  With the immediate impact of Brexit mostly out of the way and no policy tightening on the horizon, there is clear evidence of improving investor confidence.  The next two events of consequence are the Italian referendum on government reform in October and the November U.S. elections.  In the wake of Brexit, we would expect EU officials to give some ground to Italy; we note that the new head of Italy’s largest bank, UniCredit (UCG, €2.18), called for a “more lenient stance” on bank support from the EU.  Although the risk of a President Trump is, in our opinion, probably higher than polls suggest, it is still nothing more than a coin flip.  Essentially, the biggest risk we identified in our 2016 outlook, a policy mistake by the FOMC, is becoming less likely, at least in terms of tightening too much and too often.  On the other hand, we may be facing the other risk, which is that stable policy triggers financial market exuberance.

View the complete PDF

___________________________

[1] https://www.washingtonpost.com/world/national-security/new-isis-recruits-have-deep-criminal-roots/2016/03/23/89b2e590-f12e-11e5-a61f-e9c95c06edca_story.html

Asset Allocation Weekly (July 15, 2016)

by Asset Allocation Committee

Since the recovery began, we have consistently favored duration in fixed income.  Our position has been that growth would remain sluggish in the developed world and global overcapacity would keep inflation contained.  The consensus of strategists and economists didn’t support our position.

This chart shows the path of the 10-year T-note yield along with the forecast at the beginning of each year from the Philadelphia FRB Professional Forecasters Survey.  The open boxes indicate when the forecasts were incorrect; the solid circles indicate correct forecasts.  We are on the 17th forecast; so far, 10 have been wrong and, barring a strong jump in yields similar to 2012, the forecasters will be incorrect this year as well.

In general, the persistently incorrect forecasts are likely due to the consensus opinion that the economy, inflation and markets will normalize over some time frame.  Instead, since the turn of the century, inflation has steadily declined and, in the aftermath of the financial crisis, economic growth has been persistently low.  Accordingly, financial markets and global economies have been operating in a “new normal” rather than a return to the 1990s normal.

Although our position on fixed income has been correct, we are watchful for conditions that would reverse this long-term downtrend in yields.  Inflation trends often have a political element.  One of the key tradeoffs society makes is between equality and efficiency.[1]  When society is leaning toward the latter, bonds will tend to do well because inflation will be controlled.  If equality is demanded, the risk levels of bonds rise.  Thus, we are carefully watching Brexit, Bernie Sanders and Donald Trump.  These are all manifestations of a potential trend toward equality that would likely be expressed by re-regulation and deglobalization of the economy.  If these trends, and others, gain traction, the potential for rising inflation and interest rates would increase.  For now, we continue to favor long duration assets.  Given the high level of binary risks looming (the process of the U.K. leaving the EU, November U.S. elections, the Italian referendum on government reform and its banking problems), long duration Treasuries offer some protection against bearish events, as the Brexit situation showed.  But, we are closely monitoring economic and political conditions for a change in the secular trend in bonds.

View the PDF

_________________________

[1] For a discussion on efficiency and equality cycles, see our recent WGR: Post-Brexit (7/11/16).

Daily Comment (July 14, 2016)

by Bill O’Grady and Kaisa Stucke

[Posted: 9:30 AM EDT] Equities are higher this morning on expectations of continued support from policy stimulus.  Although the BOE disappointed (see below), the BOJ looks like it is moving steadily toward direct BOJ financing of fiscal spending, otherwise known as helicopter money.  Japan remains mired in near-deflationary conditions and the JPY has been strengthening lately.  This rise has been exacerbated by a stealth depreciation of the CNY, making Japan’s exports less competitive compared to a key competitor in Asia.

This chart shows the JPM real effective exchange rates of China and Japan.  For most of this year, Japan’s exchange rate has been strengthening while China’s has been weakening.  Japan will not tolerate this situation indefinitely.  For some perspective, note the chart below.

The vertical line shows Abe’s election win in late 2012.  Note how the general trend has been for the JPY to weaken and the CNY to appreciate.  This year has seen a reversal in that trend and we suspect that the Abe government wants to push back against this year’s exchange trends.  As we have noted before, one of the primary effects of helicopter money is a sharp depreciation in the exchange rate.  If China reacts against this, the exporting of deflation to world markets will accelerate.

The BOE surprised the markets to some extent by keeping policy steady.  There were general expectations for a cut.  The vote was 8-1, with the dissenter calling for a cut of 25 bps.  The BOE did indicate that a cut in August is possible but, given the uncertainty surrounding the May government and Brexit, in general, the BOE decided to wait before acting.  The GBP rose sharply on the news.

(Source: Bloomberg)

This is the intraday chart on the £/$ exchange rate in USD per GBP.  The pound jumped on the news of no change in rates.

The U.S. crude oil inventories fell a bit more than forecast, dipping 2.6 mb versus estimates of a 2.3 mb decline.

This chart shows current crude oil inventories, both over the long term and the last decade.  We are starting to see inventories decline, but normal levels would be below 400 mb, some 130 mb lower than now.

So, obviously, inventories remain elevated.  Inventories have been lagging the usual seasonal pattern.  We are in a period of the year when crude oil stockpiles tend to fall at an increasing pace.  The pace of declines will slow in the coming weeks as we are halfway through the summer driving season.

It is important to remember that the dollar is playing a bigger role in determining oil prices.

Based on inventories alone, oil prices are profoundly overvalued at a fair value price of $34.98.  Meanwhile, the EUR/WTI model generates a fair value of $47.07.  Together (which is a more sound methodology), fair value is $40.80, meaning that current prices are a bit rich.

Perhaps the bigger worry is product supplies.  Gasoline inventories are also quite elevated and, with the end of the summer driving season in sight, it appears we will head toward Labor Day with a significant overhang of stockpiles unless refineries cut production, which will dampen crude demand.

This chart shows the current level of gasoline inventories along with last year’s levels and the five-year average.  Current stocks are 25.3 mb above average for this time of year.  This high level of gasoline stocks is occurring despite robust consumption levels.

This chart shows weekly gasoline consumption on a rolling four-week average for the current year, last year and the five-year average.  The chart clearly shows that consumption is outpacing last year and the average.  However, the chart also shows that we only have about another month of elevated demand before the autumn slowdown begins.  Although we are not wildly bearish oil at this time, a pullback into the low $40s would not be a major surprise.

Finally, the lead story in today’s FT reports that the Obama administration is lodging a formal complaint against China at the WTO over China’s export restrictions on key metals, such as copper and cobalt.  These restrictions create an artificially low price market for these raw materials and give companies that use these metals an advantage in global trade.  We suspect this action is being taken to placate an electorate becoming increasingly jaded with globalization.

View the complete PDF

Daily Comment (July 13, 2016)

by Bill O’Grady and Kaisa Stucke

[Posted: 9:30 AM EDT] It was another quiet overnight session.  Equities continue to be well bid; as noted above, so far, earnings are coming in better than expected.  Of course, as our AAW discusses this week, the data we track daily comes from Thomson-Reuters, meaning that they are probably overstating the strength of earnings in the current situation.

In London, we are awaiting two events.  First, Theresa May will be appointed PM today, and second, the BOE is expected to cut rates tomorrow by 25 bps.  We view May’s appointment as an important signal for policy; this will be the topic of next week’s WGR.  On the BOE, we believe Governor Carney is quite worried about the economic impact of Brexit and thus will err on the side of excessive stimulus.  The sharp drop in the GBP is a form of monetary support so adding rate cuts to the recent depreciation should offer the U.K. economy some significant help.

The other stimulus situation we are following closely is Japan.  Bloomberg is reporting that the Abe government is considering at least partial direct BOJ funding of fiscal stimulus, colloquially known as “helicopter money.”[1]  By directly funding fiscal spending, the public debt load does not rise.  The downside is that this leads to a permanent rise in the money supply and will almost certainly lift inflation and weaken the JPY…which, of course, is exactly what Abenomics is trying to accomplish.  As we noted in the reports in the footnote, we expected that the first developed world nation to experiment with direct funding of fiscal spending would be Japan.

The IEA released its monthly report on the oil markets and, unlike recent comments, the study was less upbeat on prices.  The OECD group is concerned that global demand is showing signs of slowing as the Chinese economy slumps.  Although oil inventories have fallen, product stockpiles are high and rising and, at some point, refiners will be forced to cut production which will reduce oil demand.  The IEA did note that non-OPEC production is falling but also reported that OPEC output has reached an eight-year high, boosted by rising Saudi production.  The Saudi plan for OPEC (read: Saudi Arabia) to lift market share continues to play itself out in the oil markets.

View the complete PDF

__________________________

[1] See WGRs: The Geopolitics of Helicopter Money, Part 1 (5/2/16), Part 2 (5/9/16), and Part 3 (5/16/16).

Daily Comment (July 12, 2016)

by Bill O’Grady and Kaisa Stucke

[Posted: 9:30 AM EDT] The most important news for investors is that, despite everything, equity markets around the world are gaining strength.  This improvement is coming despite slowing earnings growth, sluggish economic activity, Brexit, an adverse ruling against China on its maritime claims, U.S. elections, etc.  Why the strength?  Most likely the same reason that has lifted equities all along—supportive monetary policy.

This chart models the S&P 500 (monthly average) against the Fed’s balance sheet.  Since the recovery began, the U.S. equity markets have closely tracked the size of the Fed’s balance sheet.  Since the FOMC has ended its expansion of the balance sheet, the market has mostly moved in a sideways trading range.  We are starting to see a modest breakout, but it would not be a surprise if equities fade a bit from here.

On the other hand, the combination of Brexit and unstable employment data has removed almost any chance of FOMC tightening.  We do expect some brave talk about “September being on the table” and the like, but the financial markets don’t believe it for a minute.  With the potential for turmoil this autumn tied to the U.S. elections, we doubt the Fed will have any desire to inject itself into that debate.  At the same time, it looks like Abenomics 2.0 is about to be unleashed; this version will be more fiscal in nature but will rely on the BOJ to fund the expansion.  The ECB should remain accommodative and the BOE is expected to cut rates tomorrow.  In addition, the PBOC is supporting the Chinese economy, too.  Overall, the central banks appear to be in accommodation mode, which is bullish for risk assets across the board.  In the U.S., two major fears for equities have been eliminated as uncertainty eases around Brexit due to Theresa May’s win and the Fed remains on the sidelines due to uncertainty surrounding employment.

All this points to the potential of a “melt up.”  With low bond yields and zero to negative rates on cash, equities remain attractive, at least on a relative basis.

This chart shows the level of retail money market funds held along with the S&P 500.  In general, since 2011, the base level of money market funds held runs between $900 to $950 bn.  During market pullbacks, cash accumulates (the direction of causality cannot be determined—in other words, does raising cash weaken stocks or do weaker stocks lead to higher cash levels as investors sell?); as cash is redeployed, equities recover.  Current cash levels are above the upper end of the recent range, suggesting that there is ample liquidity available to propel equities higher in the short run.

The longer term danger of a stronger stock market is that it’s doubtful it can be supported by robust earnings growth.  As this week’s AAW discusses below, even the veracity of earnings is in question due to the divergence between Thomson-Reuters and Standard & Poor’s earnings numbers.  If earnings don’t keep up, the rally will come from multiple expansion.  Low interest rates support multiple expansion but it also means that equities could become “priced to perfection.”  Thus, we are in rally mode now but we are worried it will be difficult to sustain over time.

View the complete PDF

Weekly Geopolitical Report – Post-Brexit (July 11, 2016)

by Bill O’Grady

On June 23rd, voters in the U.K. shocked global markets by voting to leave the EU.  In this report, we will examine the various paths the country may take in the coming months with regard to this issue, discuss the political lessons learned and the impact Brexit will have on other European nations.  As always, we will conclude with the potential impact on markets.

Brexit—Now What?
In the aftermath of the Brexit vote, PM Cameron announced he would be stepping down in September and the ruling Conservatives will select a new prime minister.  Over the past week, the Tories, who are members of Parliament (MPs), voted on potential replacements for Cameron.  The party started with five candidates and, through party voting and resignations, that group has narrowed to Home Secretary Theresa May.  Energy Minister Andrea Leadsom pulled out of the race today.  May is a member of the “remain” camp but has indicated that she will respect the will of the people expressed in the referendum vote.  Leadsom supported the “leave” campaign.  Thus, her exit from the campaign does have an impact on whether or not Brexit actually occurs.  It is unclear at this point, even though May is the only remaining candidate, whether the party will hold a membership vote in September to formally select her as the new prime minister.

View the full report