Daily Comment (December 8, 2022)

by Patrick Fearon-Hernandez, CFA, and Thomas Wash

[Posted: 9:30 AM EST] | PDF

Good morning! Today’s Comment begins with our thoughts about the deepening yield curve inversion and who stands to benefit. Next, we explain why we think major powers will look to make friends with commodity-rich countries. We end our report with a discussion on the impact that global fracturing will have on tech stocks.

Breaking news: WNBA player Brittney Griner was freed in a prisoner swap for an arms dealer. 

Inversion deepens:  In recent weeks, we have seen a general decline in U.S. Treasury yields.  However, the bulk of the declines have occurred in the longer duration segment of the yield curve, causing a deeper inversion. Interestingly enough, the decline in interest rates has supported international equities.

  • Recession fears and doubts about the Fed’s willingness to further tighten policy have led to a decline in both the short and long end of the yield curve. The two-year Treasury has dropped 40 bps from a month ago, but the ten-year Treasury has fallen even more, at 70 bps over the same period. As a result, the yield curve inversion is at its lowest point in over 40 years. The depth of the yield curve inversion has added to concerns that the recession could be worse than the market anticipates; however, the decline in interest rates has some unexpected beneficiaries.

  • The decline in U.S. Treasury yields has made riskier assets more attractive. Despite being down nearly 9% on the year, the Euro Stoxx 50 index is up more than 18% on the quarter. The rally in European equities is related to optimism that inflation is close to peaking, the dollar is in decline, and the situation in Ukraine won’t markedly deteriorate. Although Europe is still expected to fall into recession next year, it seems that the market is starting to believe it won’t be as bad as originally thought.
  • Although the market has been pricing in a U.S. recession over the last several months, investors are still unclear as to whether the downturn will be severe. There are likely three scenarios that will lead to a deep recession: a financial collapse, a housing market crash, and a major geopolitical event. At this time, any of these events could occur. In fact, the National Association of Home Builders suggests that the housing market is already in recession. Meanwhile, deteriorating financial conditions and the ongoing war in Ukraine are also current risks. Investors have likely discounted most of these risks, but there may still be more room for equities to drop. In the event of a crisis, the Fed could be swayed to cut rates drastically; thus, next year could lead to a strong rally.

An Uncertain World: Commodity-producing countries present a major risk to the global economy.

  • Peruvian President Pedro Castillo was replaced by Dina Boluarte after his failed attempt to change the constitution in order to avoid impeachment. Boluarte will be the country’s sixth president in less than five years. All things considered, the transition of power went rather smoothly, but Boluarte will likely be plagued by the same corruption scandals as her predecessor. At the same time, her not being elected to office will likely encourage the opposition to push for new elections. Political turmoil in a resource-rich country like Peru has the ability to cause volatility in commodity prices such as copper, gold, and zinc.
  • Meanwhile, U.S. officials are fretting over how the Chinese reopening will impact the price caps on Russian oil. Hopes of an increase in Chinese demand have boosted crude prices after four sessions of declines. Russian Urals crude oil trades at about a $20 discount to benchmark crude prices, suggesting a price of around $57 per barrel as of this morning. Although the cap is set at $60 per barrel, there are concerns that if the market price for the Urals rises above that limit, Russia will stop supplying oil to certain countries. Although the agreement to establish price caps allows for readjustment every two months, a limit set above $60 per barrel would undermine this effort to punish Moscow for the war.
  • Securing commodities within these countries will likely worsen as the world forms into blocs. As a result, leaders of the groups, who we assume will be China and the U.S., will have to increase their engagement in other parts of the world to ensure that the commodity markets remain stable. This new reality likely explains why the U.S. is relaxing tensions with Venezuela, and why China is building closer ties with Saudi Arabia. As a result, commodity-rich countries could become major investment targets as the U.S. and China vie for their interests.
    • Saudi Arabia and China are expected to sign an investment agreement and discuss the possibility of pricing oil in CNY.

Tech Pushback: Government restrictions and political scrutiny are leading to headwinds for the tech sector.

  • Meanwhile, social media giants are also being caught in regulatory crosshairs. The Biden administration is pushing the Supreme Court to hold social media companies liable for hate speech promoted on their platforms. Similarly, the push to ban TikTok is gaining momentum after South Dakota barred the use of the app for state agencies over national security concerns. Social media sites generate much of their revenue based on clicks and the data collection of their users; thus, limits on either would hurt the profitability of these firms. As a result, social media sites’ abilities to generate money is likely to be constrained by government regulations.
  • The tech sector thrives in a globalized world, and therefore, regional fracturing would significantly disrupt the industry. Tech has the highest exposure to foreign markets when compared to its peers (see the following chart). Its vulnerability to foreign markets means that restrictions will likely have an adverse effect on the industry’s ability to generate revenue. As a result, we believe that investors should be hesitant to pile into tech stocks without a deep understanding of these companies’ susceptibility to regulatory risks. Hence, a Fed pivot should not be the only factor when investing in tech stocks.

Source: Globalxefts

View PDF

Weekly Energy Update (December 8, 2022)

by Bill O’Grady, Thomas Wash, and Patrick Fearon-Hernandez, CFA | PDF

Crude oil prices continue to come under pressure on worries over economic growth.

(Source: Barchart.com)

Crude oil inventories fell 5.2 mb compared to a 3.9 mb draw forecast.  The SPR declined 2.1 mb, meaning the net draw was 7.3 mb.

In the details, U.S. crude oil production rose 0.1 mbpd to 12.2 mbpd.  Exports fell 1.5 mbpd, while imports were unchanged.  Refining activity rose 0.3% to 95.5% of capacity.

(Sources: DOE, CIM)

The above chart shows the seasonal pattern for crude oil inventories.  As the chart shows, we are past the seasonal trough in inventories and heading toward the secondary peak which occurs in early Q4.  SPR sales have distorted the usual seasonal pattern in this data.  This week’s draw takes inventories further below the seasonal average, though perhaps the most important takeaway is that the usual seasonal pattern in inventory is breaking down.

Shortly after the war started, we stopped reporting on our basic oil model that uses commercial inventory and the EUR for independent variables.  We have updated that model, which puts fair value at $73.60 per barrel.  We are currently trading near fair value for the first time since the war began.

Since the SPR is being used, to some extent, as a buffer stock, we have constructed oil inventory charts incorporating both the SPR and commercial inventories.

Total stockpiles peaked in 2017 and are now at levels last seen in 2001.  Using total stocks since 2015, fair value is $106.07.

The CapAt long last, the EU has finally agreed on a price cap plan for Russian oil, pending Poland’s approval tomorrow.  The cap price is $60 per barrel, and since the current Urals price is around that level, it’s possible that not much will change.  The price was below what the Eastern Europeans were pushing for—Poland wanted a $30 price.  The U.S., however, was afraid that a price that low, which would effectively ban Russian oil exports, would trigger a major price rally and harm the world (and U.S.) economy.  The current price won’t really stop Russian exports if Russia wants to sell the oil.  Russia’s initial reaction is to refuse to sell oil to nations using the price cap.  We also note that, effective last Monday, the EU and U.K. will stop seaborne oil imports from Russia, which will have a more material impact on the oil markets.  The most likely market reaction is volatility.  The initial reaction to the cap and the OPEC+ decision was a sharp rise in oil prices, but that reaction faded earlier this week.

Market News:

  • The White House is seeking to halt SPR sales in the coming years. Congress has tended to use the SPR as a sort of budget “piggy bank” to allow for funding of various projects.  Thus, various sales have already been authorized for future years.  However, with the SPR being drained by the sales completed due to the war in Ukraine, the administration now wants to halt those future sales.  So far, we are not seeing any programs put in place to refill the reserve, but this action does suggest growing concern about the sales.
  • Recent data suggests that U.S. drilling activity remains lackluster. Due to regulatory and investment constraints, the U.S. oil and gas industry thus far has not reacted strongly to high oil prices.  We expect that to continue.
  • The fertilizer market has been a major concern since the Russian invasion of Ukraine. Both nations are major producers of fertilizers and feedstock for the product.  The UN says that it is near a deal that would allow Russia to export ammonia via a Ukrainian pipeline.  Ammonia is a key element for the economy and resuming this supply is important.  We note that fertilizer prices have been falling recently as markets adjusted to high prices, and the UN news will likely support further price declines.
  • One of our firm’s positions is that the unwinding of U.S. hegemony will lead to supply disruptions and trigger hoarding. Confirming this assertion is an announcement that Japan is building a strategic reserve for natural gas.  Japan gets nearly all of its natural gas from LNG and has faced higher prices as European demand for LNG has soared due to the war.
  • High prices and weak economic activity have reduced EU natural gas demand.
  • If China continues to ease COVID restrictions, oil prices should benefit.
  • Saudi Arabia announced it has discovered two new natural gas fields.
  • A 2019 study by the NBER showed that lower heating costs prevent winter deaths. The study suggested that the shale gas revolution likely saved 11k lives in the U.S.  If the study is correct, high heating prices may lead to higher mortality rates in Europe this winter.
  • Ethanol blending has hit new records.
  • Mild temps are bearish for natural gas prices. Meanwhile, U.S. LNG projects are being funded rapidly, although there are concerns that the industry won’t be able to find enough gas to match these projects.
  • Glencore (GLNCY, $13.31) is planning to accelerate coal mine closures. The closures have little to do with profitability but are instead being done to meet emissions targets.  The IEA is forecasting that renewables will overtake coal by 2025.
  • Russia and China have completed a pipeline to Shanghai.
  • New England authorities are warning that if the weather is unusually cold, rolling blackouts might occur. Some of the problem is tied to the Jones Act.

 Geopolitical News:

 Alternative Energy/Policy News:

  View PDF

Daily Comment (December 7, 2022)

by Patrick Fearon-Hernandez, CFA, and Thomas Wash

[Posted: 9:30 AM EST] | PDF

Good morning, on this 81st anniversary of the surprise attack on Pearl Harbor.  Only a few surviving servicemen will visit this site today, a reflection of the aging of the WWII generation.  A 17-year-old serviceman in 1941 would be 98 today. In the markets it is another rather quiet morning.  Earlier this morning, U.S. equity futures and oil were lower but have turned higher in the past hour while the dollar is mixed.

In today’s Comment, our coverage begins with China news.  International news comes next, and our update on the war in Ukraine follows.  Coverage of economic and market news is next in line, and we close with a roundup of U.S. news.

China News:  China is moving rapidly to ease COVID restrictions and there is some evidence of a thaw in U.S./China tech relations.

  • So far, there has been no national announcement of an end to Zero-COVID policies, but we are seeing a rapid dismantling of the restrictions. Here are some of the changes:
  • An important element of the adjustment to policy is expanded vaccinations. A key worry is the low level of immunizations found among the elderly, who are especially vulnerable to COVID.  China is facing strong resistance to vaccination among its older population.
  • This opening brings risks with some models suggesting up to one million deaths could result. But with rising social unrest and a soft economy, Beijing likely feels it has little option but to ease restrictions.  As we noted yesterday, the narrative around the Omicron variant is that it isn’t as deadly as earlier strains.  Although there is some data to support that idea, it is also true that in the West, by the time Omicron was circulating, vaccinations and widespread infections were already in place and resistance was therefore elevated.  In China, with fewer vaccinations and infections, the fast-spreading variant could be a problem.
  • A surge in infections could not just overburden the health system, it could expose health workers to the virus.
  • The recent actions to thwart China’s efforts to acquire advanced semiconductor chips and the tools to build them is leading to some adjustments. Corporate America is generally opposing the turn against China and their lobbying efforts are leading Congress to ease restrictions.  On China’s side, Beijing is allowing U.S. officials to enforce export controls to ensure that chips don’t end up in the hands of the military.  We don’t think these measures will change the trajectory of policy, but it does show how hard it is to enforce economic restrictions on a country like China, who is deeply enmeshed in the global economy.
  • TikTok continues to be a problem for U.S. security officials. The government remains worried that China will use the platform not only to collect data but to execute influence operations.

International News:  Germany uncovers a right-wing coup plot, and Argentina’s vice-president has been found guilty of fraud.

  • Twenty-five people were arrested from three countries on suspicion of a coup to overthrow the German government. Among those detained is a former AfD lawmaker, and a member of Germany’s special forces.  It isn’t obvious if the plot was gaining traction or close to operational capacity.  Some members did contact Russian intelligence, but there isn’t any evidence that the Russians were involved.  Germany has a neo-Nazi undercurrent that resurfaces on occasion.  During the 1970s, left-wing groups associated with communist factions, such as the Baader-Meinhof Gang, were prevalent.  None, so far, have seriously threatened the government.
  • Cristina Fernández de Kirchner, the current vice-president, a former president, and the wife of a late president, was convicted of fraud by an Argentine court. She was sentenced to six-years in prison and barred from public office for steering public works funding to a family associate while she was president and first lady.  In the short run, nothing will change.  She will appeal her conviction and during the appeal process, she will remain in office.  Her term ends next December, so it is likely she will leave office without the case being resolved.  The Kirchners are polarizing figures in Argentina; though, if the conviction sticks, it may mean the end of her family’s influence in the country.
  • The U.K. is facing a wave of labor discontent. PM Sunak is considering anti-strike legislation to stem the tide.

War in Ukraine:  More on the Ukraine strikes inside Russia, and Hungary blocks aid.

Markets, Economics and Policy:  Lumber futures rise, and supply chain issues slow arms sales.

  • Lumber prices soared during the pandemic, as there was a lift in housing and remodeling. However, the rally failed as time passed, and prices slid.  Although prices remain well below pandemic highs, prices jumped to their daily futures limit on reports that Canfor (CFPZF, $17.20) has cut mill output due to the falling demand.
  • Arms demand is elevated due to the war in Ukraine and the general rebuilding of defense. However, supply chain issues and rising costs have cut sales over the past few months.

U.S. News:  Part of North Carolina remains without power, and the Georgia Senate seat remains with Democrats.

  • Utilities are struggling to fix the sabotaged substations in North Carolina. It is still uncertain who was behind the attacks, but the event highlights the need for redundancies.  It would be prohibitively expensive to defend all infrastructure, but holding inventory of critical parts would likely speed recovery.  Of course, inventory costs money and reduces efficiency.
  • Raphael Warnock (D-GA) won a new six-year term by defeating Hershel Walker. This gives the Democrats a 51-49 advantage in the Senate.
  • Rackspace Technology (RXT, $3.95) reported a massive ransomware attack. The company hosts emails and cloud computing, mostly for business.

View PDF

Daily Comment (December 6, 2022)

by Patrick Fearon-Hernandez, CFA, and Thomas Wash

[Posted: 9:30 AM EST] | PDF

Good morning on the Feast of St. Nicholas!  It’s actually a rather quiet morning after yesterday’s risk-off day.  U.S. equity futures have been vacillating this morning, mostly trading inverse the dollar.  Gold is higher this morning, but oil is trading lower.  Equities have been taking on a tone of bad news is good news.  Yesterday’s ISM services index, coming in well above the expansion line of 50, raised fears that monetary policy won’t be as easy as hoped.  We note that the WSJ’s latest “Fed whisperer,” Nick Timiraos, published an article yesterday reiterating Chair Powell’s recent comments about moving to slower rate hikes but also signaling that tightening was far from over.  Last week, when that speech occurred, the financial markets viewed the talk as dovish.  The Timiraos article suggests that isn’t the narrative that the FOMC preferred.

In today’s Comment, our coverage begins with China news.  Economics and policy are up next, and an update on the North Carolina substation attack follows.  Our war in Ukraine briefing comes next, and we close with the international roundup.

China News:  The state funeral for Jiang Zemin has begun, as the CPC does its best to project unity.  We also update the COVID situation.

Markets, Economics and Policy:  The economic picture is mixed.  Business leaders are worried but still see a soft landing.  Supply chains are improving, but layoffs are rising.

  • Recent CEO surveys suggest that business leaders are becoming more concerned about the economy, but still expect a soft landing. It’s not obvious if these leaders have a great track record on forecasting the economy (to be fair, no one else is all that good either) but their attitudes likely reflect present business activity.  Thus, we see it as confirmation that we are not currently in a recession.
  • At long last, supply chains appear to be improving. Freight rates have been easing, and we note that in the recent ISM data, there is growing evidence of improvement.

North Carolina:  Although authorities are not calling the weekend attack on substations in North Carolina domestic terrorism, the actions were clearly targeted, suggesting that it wasn’t just a random attack.  Utilities are steadily bringing power back online, but it probably won’t be until Thursday before power is fully restored.  Our worry is that if similar attacks become common, not only will it cause disruptions, but mitigation efforts (backup generators, diesel stocks, extra food, etc.) will tend to be costly and could boost inflation.

War in Ukraine:  Ukraine strikes inside Russia which could expose divergences in goals among allies.

  • Although Kyiv hasn’t fully accepted responsibility, it appears that Ukrainian drones attacked three Russian airfields inside of Russia proper, including one that houses some of Russia’s strategic air assets[1]. A drone also hit a Russian oil depotUkraine’s ability to strike inside Russia is a new development, and one that the U.S probably isn’t pleased about.  We note that the U.S. “modified” its HIMARS systems given to Ukraine to reduce its range and lessen the likelihood that Ukraine could strike within Russia.
    • This development could mark a serious escalation of the war. First, if Ukraine now has the ability to strike targets deep inside Russia, then Putin’s conduct of the war will come under further scrutiny.  Second, Ukraine’s Western allies are mostly willing to support this war as long as it stays contained, since the West has no interest in seeing this conflict expand.  Attacking Russia proper changes the nature of the war and could prompt Russia to take more aggressive steps, such as engaging tactical nuclear weapons.
    • We will wait to see the U.S./allied response. Since the drones appear to be of Ukrainian origin, the U.S. and its allies can argue that it wasn’t Western arms that attacked Russia.  We doubt the Kremlin will accept this argument.  We look for the West to restrict weapons sales further to discourage this development.
  • Meanwhile, polls show some reduction in support among Americans for “indefinite” aid to Ukraine. And Germany is balking on sending the arms it promised earlier.
  • As the war continues, the Kremlin is increasing its commandeering of private companies to support the war effort. This action will tend to reduce available supply; if money supply isn’t restricted, then inflation will worsen.

International News:  The EU awakens to the change in U.S. policy.


[1] In other words, it houses an element of its nuclear weapons delivery.

[2] Which is a bit rich, given that numerous policies, such as regulations on food, are clearly protectionist.

View PDF

Daily Comment (December 5, 2022)

by Patrick Fearon-Hernandez, CFA, and Thomas Wash

[Posted: 9:30 AM EST] | PDF

Our Comment today opens with a long discussion of several key developments today in the global energy markets, including the implementation of several sanctions against Russia’s oil and natural gas due to its invasion of Ukraine.  We next review a wide range of other international and U.S. developments with the potential to affect the financial markets today.

Global Energy Market:  This week could be momentous for global energy markets, with the European Union and U.K. set to implement a ban on Russian oil imports, the broader group of industrialized countries set to impose a price cap on Russian oil exports, and Chinese President Xi set to visit Saudi Arabia.  These developments illustrate how the increased friction between the evolving U.S. and China-led geopolitical blocs has sparked a new era of intense economic warfare around the world, creating both headwinds and opportunities for investors.

  • As previewed in our Comment on Friday, the Group of Seven (G7) countries and their allies, representing much of the world’s richest and most advanced democracies, approved a plan to cap the price of Russian oil exports beginning today. To cut the revenues available to Russia for its war against Ukraine, the cap will ban Western companies from insuring, financing, or shipping Russian oil unless it is sold for less than $60 per barrel.
    • Russian officials have said they will not send any oil to countries that implement the price cap.
    • There are differences of opinion regarding the impact of the price cap on global oil prices. Oil prices are up so far this morning, but that could primarily be because of looser COVID-19 restrictions in China (see below).
  • Separately, today the EU and the U.K. will implement its ban on importing Russian oil, which was approved earlier this year. They will also implement a ban on Russian refined products beginning in early February.
  • Yesterday, the Organization of the Petroleum Exporting Countries and its Russia-led partners said that they will stand by their October decision to cut oil production by two million barrels per day, rather than the proposals last month ranging from an output cut to an output increase. The decision will give the OPEC+ group more time to assess the impact of the EU ban on Russian imports and the broader price cap on Russian oil exports.
  • Of course, oil isn’t the only front in the energy war. Data from commodity analytics firm ICIS shows that the EU’s demand for natural gas in October and November was 24% lower than its five-year average.  The figures suggest that the EU has made significant progress in finding energy efficiencies and implementing conservation measures, although they were also helped by the relatively warm weather in early autumn.
  • Spooked by the energy supply disruptions from the war in Ukraine, the Japanese government has launched a plan to develop a strategic reserve of liquified natural gas. The program would require importing an additional 840,000 tons of LNG per year, consistent with our view that the geopolitical fracturing of the world will not only threaten energy supplies, but will also encourage hoarding behavior, all of which will tend to buoy commodity prices.

Russia-Ukraine War:  As heavy fighting continues primarily in the Donbas region of northeastern Ukraine, and Russian forces continue to launch air, missile, and kamikaze drone attacks against Ukrainian infrastructure, explosions were reported at two air bases deep inside Russia.  The explosions reportedly damaged or destroyed several Russian military aircraft.  They are also consistent with a number of other explosions in Russian territory throughout the war that were likely carried out by Ukraine, although the Ukrainian authorities have not formally acknowledged any role in the attacks.

China:  Following the previous week’s big protests against the government’s Zero-COVID policies and repressions of freedom, we are seeing increasing reports that local government officials are gradually ratcheting back some pandemic restrictions.  The rollbacks include lifting some curbs on residents’ movements, such as by ending mandatory COVID testing for people who want to use public transport, enter parks, or visit other public spaces.  The authorities are also stepping up their efforts to vaccinate vulnerable citizens, especially the elderly, probably in an attempt to shield the population and healthcare system in case looser pandemic rules lead to higher infection rates.

  • The modest loosening of COVID restrictions may have helped eliminate the recent protests, but a heavy police presence and surveillance around potential protest sites probably played the bigger role.
  • The apparent easing in COVID rules have given a big boost to Chinese stocks and the CNY so far this morning. However, we continue to think the government’s COVID policies will weigh on the economy.  Much of China’s economy is still on lockdown, and even if the pandemic rules are loosened, the lack of herd immunity and weaknesses in the healthcare system mean big new outbreaks of infection will likely hold back activity.  That will also continue to create headwinds for the broader global economy and financial markets.

Iran:  After weeks of anti-government protests touched off by anger at the country’s Islamic “morality police,” the Iranian government said it is dismantling the organization and may roll back some rules such as the requirement that women wear the hijab in public.  However, protests continued over the weekend, signaling that the small grant of freedom may not be enough to relieve the political pressure on the government.  Instability in Iran, a major oil producer, may therefore continue in the near term.

Eurozone:  October retail sales fell by a seasonally adjusted 1.8%, even worse than expected and the biggest drop since last December.  Sales in October were also down 2.7% from the same month one year earlier.  The data supports the view that the Eurozone economy is now falling into recession.

United States-European Union:  In the latest sign that new U.S. subsidies and “buy-American” rules will prompt Europe to respond in kind, European Commission President von der Leyen said that the EU must “simplify and adapt” its rules on state aid to allow similar protectionist policies.  U.S. and EU officials are due to meet today to discuss the issue.

  • The Biden administration has not strongly pushed back against insinuations that the EU could respond with its own protectionist policies. Indeed, U.S. Trade Representative Tai recently proposed that the EU adopt similar policies, probably aimed at a reduction in EU trade with China.
  • In his meeting with French President Macron last week, Biden also suggested that the U.S. could adjust its rules to address European concerns.
  • The Europeans remain quite irritated and concerned about the new U.S. industrial support, which is focused largely on green technology, but President Biden’s conciliatory stance suggests that a trade war is not necessarily set in stone.

United States:  Two electrical substations in rural North Carolina were attacked by gunfire on Saturday evening, leading to power outages that could last for days for over 33,000 customers.  Although the outage is relatively small, the apparently deliberate attack has raised concern about follow-on attacks and the overall vulnerability of the nation’s electrical supply.

View PDF

Asset Allocation Bi-Weekly – Forecasting Financial Stress (December 5, 2022)

by the Asset Allocation Committee | PDF

[Note: The podcast that accompanies this report will be delayed until 12/12. Also, this report will go on holiday hiatus following today’s report; the next report will be published on January 16, 2023.]

One of the challenges of market strategy is the problem of financial stress.  In colloquial terms, the “Fed raises rates until something breaks.”  The problem is that the “something-breaks” event is difficult to predict in terms of when.  There are numerous financial stress and conditions indices that suggest rising financial tensions.  These tell us when conditions are such that problems might develop, but they don’t help us much with when a problem is likely to emerge.

This chart shows the Chicago FRB’s National Financial Conditions Index (CNFCI).  A reading of zero shows normal conditions, while any number less than zero implies favorable conditions.  Before mid-year 1998, financial conditions were highly correlated to the fed funds rate.  Since 1998, the two series have become almost entirely uncorrelated.  In 1998, the U.S. passed the Financial Services Modernization Act, often named for its authors, Senators Gramm, Leach, and Bliley.  This act changed the nature of the financial system as it was mostly bank-financed prior to this legislation.  The 1998 act allowed other financial participants to engage in lending and other bank-like activities.  Essentially, the U.S. financial system became money market-financed after 1998.

This change was designed to improve the efficiency of the financial system, but it also changed the “lender of last resort” function of the Federal Reserve.  Before 1998, if the FOMC raised rates, financial conditions deteriorated, but that problem could be easily addressed with rate cuts.  But note that after 1998, the fed funds rate became ineffective in either improving or weakening financial conditions.  The 2004-09 period is the best example of this problem as the FOMC raised rates with little impact on financial conditions.  Once a crisis developed (shown as a jump in the CNFCI), it took very aggressive rate cuts and promises to keep rates low for a long period of time before conditions improved.  Something similar developed in 2020 around the pandemic.

Currently, we are in a tightening cycle.  The CNFCI has increased but remains below zero. However, the worry remains that if the FOMC keeps raising rates, “something will break” which is represented by a spike in the index.  The notion of the “Fed pivot” is based on the expectation that as conditions deteriorate, the Fed will rapidly reverse policy tightening, which would be bullish for financial assets.  If something breaking is a prerequisite for the pivot, it would be useful to have some idea of when that might occur.

One way we attempt to determine when a tightening cycle may be poised to end is to compare the fed funds target to the implied three-month LIBOR rate from the Eurodollar futures market.

LIBOR rates represent funding costs for money market lending.  In general, because this collateral or the counterparties are not necessarily guaranteed by the government, it is reasonable to expect that the LIBOR rate should exceed the fed funds target.  And, as the top line of the chart indicates, most of the time it does.  However, on occasion, the spread inverts.  We have placed vertical lines on the above chart showing when these inversions have occurred.  Inversion suggests that the financial markets have assessed that the FOMC has raised rates enough and should either stop raising rates or consider cutting them.  In the 1990s, during the Greenspan Fed, rates were cut quickly when this spread inverted.  And, for the most part, he supervised a long expansion and even the 2001 recession was considered rather mild.  Contrast that with the Bernanke Fed’s decision to hold rates steady for an extended period even though the Eurodollar/fed funds spread had become inverted.  The recession that followed was very deep and was accompanied by a financial crisis.

To further analyze the impact of the spread of the implied LIBOR rate to fed funds, we created the below chart.

The lower part of this chart shows the fed funds/implied LIBOR spread.  We have placed a purple line at the -40 bps level, and when this level is penetrated, it has tended to signal that a financial accident is more likely.  In the past two events, an inversion below the -40 bps line was followed by a crisis six to 12 months later.  We are not at that point yet, but if the FOMC moves the fed funds target up by 50 bps in mid-December, the chances increase that we will see the spread invert below this level.

The Fed has two formal mandates and one universal mandate.  Its two formal mandates are full employment and low inflation.  These are legislated by Congress and defined by the Fed, but all central banks exist to support the functioning of financial markets.  We are seeing conditions evolve to a point where the FOMC may need to stop tightening or even ease in order to address the universal mandate.  However, that may force the Fed to ease before it contains inflation.  We suspect that the Fed will probably attempt to bring down inflation while hoping to avoid a financial problem.  In fact, the recent signal that the pace of hikes will slow may be designed to avoid an “accident.”  By moving less aggressively, we surmise that the FOMC hopes it can still bring down inflation and avoid a financial crisis. Nevertheless, the chances of a financial accident appear poised to grow in the coming months.

View PDF

Daily Comment (December 2, 2022)

by Patrick Fearon-Hernandez, CFA, and Thomas Wash

[Posted: 9:30 AM EST] | PDF

Howdy! Equities are down this morning after the jobs report soundly beat expectations, Today’s Comment begins with an overview of the recent sell-off in the U.S. dollar and what it means for financial markets. Next, we discuss the U.S. government’s efforts to resolve tensions with unions and the EU. Lastly, we explain the risk the war in Ukraine poses to equities abroad.

Dollar Peaking? The recent retreat in the greenback is significant, but it isn’t clear if it will last, as evidenced by its recovery today in the wake of the payroll data.

  • Although the U.S. dollar is one of the best-performing assets in 2022, it has begun to turn. The greenback has dropped more than 7% from its September peak. Its descent was driven by a combination of speculation that the Fed is almost done hiking and greater positivity about the global economy heading into 2023. The CPI and PCE inflation reports both came in below expectations. Meanwhile, GDP data from Germany and optimism of China’s reopening have made a global recession next year less likely. Additionally, signs that global inflation is approaching its peak have made foreign currencies more attractive.

U.S. Firefighting: The president and Congress are moving to contain flames both domestically and abroad.

  • The Senate passed legislation that would prevent rail workers from going on strike. The bill is expected to be sent to President Biden’s desk to be signed into law. The passage of the bill has prevented a strike from disrupting the U.S. economy but could have political costs for Democrats in upcoming elections. Rail workers were pushing for seven days of paid sick leave, a tenet that should have left-wing support on paper. The Democrats’ decision not to support labor is an example of how the party is becoming more pro-business establishment and less union-friendly. A stricter line by government officials could ease inflation and may be preferable to equities.
    • Government and unions can have a hot and cold relationship depending on the economic environment. In an inflationary period, politicians have been known to turn on labor.
  • President Biden is open to negotiating with Russian President Vladimir Putin over the war in Ukraine. This stance is in contrast with the U.S. president’s previous statement that peace talks must include Ukraine. Although there is some sign that Putin may accept the invitation, the change in Biden’s tone suggests that the West wants the war to end. Biden’s offer came after meeting with French Emmanuel Macron. In the past, Macron has criticized the U.S. for profiting from the conflict at Europe’s expense. Thus, there is a possibility that Western support for Ukraine could be fading, which should be favorable to financial markets.
  • Although demand remains an important driver of inflation, there are still many supply-side factors that can support higher prices. The growing power of labor unions has given unions more leverage to negotiate higher wages and benefits from firms. Meanwhile, the uncertainty in Ukraine suggests that commodity prices will continue to fluctuate. The Fed will consider these factors when determining whether it should lower rates. That said, U.S. central bank officials have shown no intention of distinguishing demand and supply pressures when deciding policy. Thus, supply-side shocks could lead the Fed to raise rates higher and for longer than the market currently expects.

Russia Risk Rising: A string of suspicious packages sent across Europe raises new questions about the war; meanwhile, the EU continues to bicker over price caps.

  • Threatening packages were sent to Ukrainian embassies in Hungary, the Netherlands, Poland, Croatia, Italy, and Austria. Packages contained varying materials, from explosives to animal parts. Although no one was harmed, Western governments believe that the boxes are a form of terrorism and intimidation. The delivery of these threatening items could be a warning that there are factions, within Russia or sympathetic to, who are willing to escalate the war outside of the Ukrainian borders. At this time, the packages do not provide present a risk but could be a warning of something worse to come.
  • Meanwhile, EU members still need to settle on a price cap for Russian oil. Although the recent proposal shows a price cap of $60, some countries within the bloc would like the lid to be lower, and others prefer to do away with the price cap entirely. Countries most in danger of being invaded are pushing for a lower limit as it would deprive Moscow of needed revenues to expand its war aims. However, EU members most adversely impacted by the price limit have warned that a low cap could make it harder for countries to receive energy supplies.
  • Uncertainty in Ukraine represents a prevalent risk for European equities. Despite efforts from the West to curtail Russian oil production, it has still been able to increase its shipments worldwide. OPEC’s willingness to work with Moscow to minimize the impact of Western restrictions makes the problem worse. Meanwhile, the threat of a broader conflict could escalate tensions between the West and Russia. In short, investors should be mindful that any de-escalation of the war effort will likely be taken positively by the markets, especially in Europe. In the meantime, the U.S. remains safe, a place to hide and wait.

View PDF

Daily Comment (December 1, 2022)

by Patrick Fearon-Hernandez, CFA, and Thomas Wash

[Posted: 9:30 AM EST] | PDF

Good morning! Today’s Comment begins with our thoughts about Wednesday’s speech by Fed Chair Powell. Next, we give an overview of China’s move away from its Zero-COVID policy. We end with international news focusing on the growing fractures within the Western alliance.

Fed Talks: Fed Chair Jerome Powell signaled that the central bank is not prepared to lower rates; however, the market is not convinced.

  • The market rejoiced following suggestions that the Federal Reserve would scale back the size of rate increases. On Wednesday, Powell hinted that the central bank may moderate the pace of hikes at its December meeting but also that the Fed was not done raising rates. The S&P 500 soared over 3%, there was a bullish steepening in the yield curve, and the U.S. dollar index dropped. This market reaction indicates that investors are confident that the Fed is nearly finished with its tightening cycle. The latest Fed Watch Tools show that the market has priced in a nearly 80% chance that the Fed will raise its policy rate by 50 bps at its meeting later this month. Meanwhile, market bets predict that the Fed will begin cutting rates in the latter half of 2023.

  • This bullish reaction from investors was likely not the response Powell expected when he made his comments. Fed officials have insisted that they will not stop tightening until inflation makes sufficient gains toward its 2% target. Thus, we suspect Fed Governors Michelle Bowman and Michael Barr will attempt to rein in expectations when they speak on Thursday. Additionally, stronger-than-expected employment data to be released on Friday might also reduce sentiment that the Fed is close to ending its tightening cycle. Therefore, Wednesday’s gain could be short-lived.
  • Although inflation remains stubbornly high, there are signs that price pressures are starting to ease. U.S. rent prices fell for the third consecutive month in November, according to ApartmentList.com. Meanwhile, data collected from the Standard & Poor’s Case-Shiller Home Price Index shows that national home prices are also falling. Shelter prices comprise a third of the Consumer Price Index, so a drop would weigh heavily on price pressures. That said, it generally takes several months for the index to pick up changes in the housing market due to how the data is tracked.
    • There is also a risk that if the dollar weakens and OPEC+ follows through on rumored production cuts, energy prices could rise and prevent inflation from falling further.

China in Focus: Beijing is walking a fine line as it attempts to display confidence in its pandemic response while also pacifying a growingly disgruntled public.

  • China hinted that it may reduce the pandemic restrictions as public anger arises after a new round of lockdowns. A top Chinese official announced that the latest variant of COVID was “less pathogenic” than previous strains. This sentiment was also reflected in the state media’s softer tone when discussing the virus. One editorial went as far as to say that people “should not be too afraid of Omicron.” Over recent weeks, the country has ramped up its vaccination efforts and has entertained the possibility of importing Western vaccines. The renewed push is likely a positive sign for Chinese equities.
  • Although substantial policy changes did not follow the remarks, the market believes reopening is on the horizon. The news initially led to a sharp rally in the Hang Seng China Enterprises Index, which rose to as high as 3.7% on the day; however, most of those gains subsided as investors realized that a reopening was not expected to be smooth. Beijing will likely drop restrictions at a slow pace as it does not want to give the impression that it is caving to public pressures. Additionally, there may be some hesitancy among people still wary to leave their homes due to COVID concerns.
  • The reopening of the Chinese economy provides both positives and negatives for the rest of the world. The loosening of restrictions should increase economic activity, which should then help boost global growth and relieve some supply chain pressures. However, the reemergence of the Chinese consumers will increase the demand for energy products and push up the prices for commodities. In short, the overall impact of China’s reopening is complicated, to say the least. Thus, a slow reopening will likely fare better for equities than a quick one would.

Friends or Foe:  Allies within the North Atlantic Treaty Organization are becoming frustrated with U.S. foreign and economic policies.

View PDF

Weekly Energy Update (December 1, 2022)

by Bill O’Grady, Thomas Wash, and Patrick Fearon-Hernandez, CFA | PDF

Crude oil prices have been falling on fears of weaker Chinese demand due to COVID issues.  We note that the futures market structure has moved into contango, where the deferred contracts trade at a premium to the spot.  This is a bearish market structure.

(Source: Barchart.com)

Crude oil inventories fell 12.6 mb compared to a 3.1 mb draw forecast.  The SPR declined 1.4 mb, meaning the net draw was 14.0 mb.

In the details, U.S. crude oil production was steady at 12.1 mbpd.  Exports rose 0.7 mbpd, while imports fell 1.0 mbpd.  Refining activity rose 1.3% to 95.2% of capacity.

(Sources: DOE, CIM)

The above chart shows the seasonal pattern for crude oil inventories.  As the chart shows, we are past the seasonal trough in inventories and heading toward the secondary peak which occurs later this month.  SPR sales have distorted the usual seasonal pattern in this data.  This week’s large draw takes inventories below the seasonal average, though perhaps the most important takeaway is that the usual seasonal pattern in inventory is breaking down.

Since the SPR is being used, to some extent, as a buffer stock, we have constructed oil inventory charts incorporating both the SPR and commercial inventories.

Total stockpiles peaked in 2017 and are now at levels last seen in 2001.  Using total stocks since 2015, fair value is $108.94.

 Refinery runs are elevated as refiners take advantage of favorable crack spreads.

(Sources:  DOE, CIM)

 Market News:

  • This is a major week for global oil markets. On December 5, the EU is expected to implement its sanctions on Russian oil exports, specifically targeting the insurance and financing infrastructure of the oil trade.  Tied to these sanctions is U.S. support for a price cap.  The goal of the EU sanctions is to cut Russian oil from world markets and undermine Russia’s ability to conduct the war in Ukraine.  The goal of the price cap is to allow some level of Russian oil flows but at reduced prices.  So far, Moscow says it won’t sell oil under the price cap system.  In addition, the EU hasn’t been able to decide on a price since more hawkish nations want a low price, while others, who are less hawkish, want something closer to the market price.
    • The consensus is that the price cap won’t work because, generally speaking, a consumer can’t usually dictate what the price of a product will be. As consumers, we may decide not to buy at a given price, but we can’t go to the seller and simply set the price.  After all, if we could do that, it would literally be a “free world”!  However, if a buyer has market power, then they can influence the price that sellers can get for their product.  OPEC+ is worried that the price cap mechanism will be turned on them, and that the cap could evolve into a “buyer’s cartel.”  That is a risk, but we doubt that will occur.  In this specific case, however, Russia is deeply vulnerable to the sanctions and cap.  Why?  Russia is dependent on foreign tankers and especially foreign insurance and financing to move oil.  Russian ports can’t handle the largest crude carriers and the supply of smaller vessels is tight. Also, despite its best efforts, Russia has not been able to duplicate the existing insurance and financing system for oil sales, which reduces the number of tankers available to carry Russian oil.  That doesn’t mean there are not rogue carriers, but they are not big enough to matter much.
    • The U.S. wants the cap because it fears that the EU plan will result in a spike in oil prices. It wants to keep Russian oil flowing but reduce the revenue Russia receives.  If Russia holds to the policy that it won’t honor the price cap, it could easily find itself in a situation where it is forced to close in production, and once shut in, that production may be lost indefinitely.  If that occurs, oil prices could jump.
    • It should be noted that Russia is finding fewer takers of its oil, and the Urals benchmark price has fallen to around $52 per barrel. So, even without a cap, the expectations of one seem to be having an impact.
  • Although OPEC+ was making noises about cutting production in the face of weak prices, it looks like the cartel is more likely to maintain current production targets.
  • Tensions within the ruling coalition have led Norway to delay any new oil and gas leases until 2025, a blow to European energy supplies.
  • As diesel prices soar, the “magic” of markets is starting to work. Consumption is easing, and refining operations are increasing, causing inventories to lift.

(Sources: DOE, CIM)

  • However, this good news may still not be enough for New England to escape high prices and shortages.
  • Europeans have been complaining that the U.S. is profiting from the war in Ukraine[1] by pointing at the massive price differential between U.S. and EU gas prices. However, it turns out the profiteers are European.  Most LNG sold by the U.S. is based on the Henry Hub price, the benchmark for the CME futures contract.  Currently, that’s set at 115% plus $3.00 of the benchmark price.  However, the actual price in Europe is far higher; for example, a $6.00 per MMBTU price at the Henry Hub translates to a €32.59 MWH price.  European utilities are buying at that price and reselling the gas at nearly €119 MWH.
  • As global demand weakens and supply chains begin to improve, freight rates are falling rapidly, but that isn’t the case with oil tanker rates. High demand and the scramble to secure transportation before EU sanctions on Russian oil are in place are sending rates to record levels.
  • Japan is warning that global LNG supplies are sold out “for years,” but what they mean is that most LNG is sold on long-term contracts. That’s how the infrastructure for LNG is usually financed — a project aligns buyers on long-term contracts at a set price to pay for the build-out of the project and then sends the gas to the buyers regardless of the spot price.  Japanese buyers report that there are no long-term contracts available before 2026, meaning that the “marginal molecule” is being sold at spot rates.
  • Germany and Qatar have agreed to a 15-year supply deal for LNG.
  • There is growing evidence that the Middle East has reached oil capacity limits and shale oil production has not reacted to high oil prices as it has in the past. However, one bright spot for additional barrels is coming from deep-water offshore projects such as Brazil and Guyana.
  • Western Canada is seeing a jump in natural gas production and could become a significant supplier of LNG to the Asia-Pacific region.
  • Despite having what appears to be ample generating capacity, China suffers from regular blackouts. The reasons are complicated but involve the lack of market pricing and  regional distrust, which then leads to excess capacity construction.

 Geopolitical News:

 Alternative Energy/Policy News:


[1] Among other general complaints.

[2] In fact, French President Macron is visiting the U.S. this week and subsidies are expected to be discussed.

  View PDF