Daily Comment (August 23, 2022)

by Patrick Fearon-Hernandez, CFA, and Thomas Wash

[Posted: 9:30 AM EDT] | PDF

Our Comment today opens with an update on the Russia-Ukraine war, where military operations remain relatively quiet.  We next review a wide range of other international and U.S. developments with the potential to affect the financial markets today, including more evidence of financial volatility and economic weakness in Europe.

Russia-Ukraine:  Russian forces continue to make only the most limited of territorial gains in Ukraine’s eastern Donbas region, and some observers suggest those gains have only been possible because the Ukrainians are thinning out their lines in the region in order to move more troops to the Kherson area.  The Ukrainians continue to suggest they will launch a counteroffensive to retake the city of Kherson and surrounding areas from their Russian occupiers, and in recent weeks they have taken some steps toward preparing for that counteroffensive.  Lately, however, we have seen very little sign of the counteroffensive ramping up in earnest, suggesting the Ukrainians may have changed their plans.

Global Energy Markets:  Saudi Arabia Energy Minister Prince Abdulaziz bin Salman has warned that OPEC and its Russia-led allies may cut their crude oil production because of the recent volatility in futures markets.  In response, global oil prices have jumped almost 1.4% so far this morning, with Brent now trading at $97.82 per barrel.

  • We would note that key members of the OPEC+ alliance haven’t been able to meet their production targets.  Most importantly, some analysts have questioned how much spare capacity Saudi Arabia really has.  An announced production cut might, therefore, have relatively little impact on actual supply.  The energy minister’s statement could well have been geared merely to reverse the recent softening in oil prices as investors grew more concerned about weakening economic growth across the globe.
  • Meanwhile, Russia’s latest announced “maintenance” shutdown of the Nord Stream 1 natural gas pipeline to Europe and high demand for air conditioning in Europe’s heatwave continue to buoy gas prices.  U.S. natural gas futures have reached $10.00 per BTU, up some 20% over the last month and equal to their highest level in 14 years.
  • Reflecting the difficulties and long lead-time likely required to secure Europe’s energy security, Belgium Prime Minister Alexander De Croo has warned that the Continent’s next “five to ten winters will be difficult.”

Eurozone Financial Markets:  While the major central banks’ monetary tightening has affected financial markets all over the world, there is increasing evidence that the ECB’s reduced bond buying has stoked volatility in the Eurozone’s bond market.  For example, German government bond yields have recently been more volatile than at any other time in the last decade, and spreads between German and Italian yields are reaching concerning levels again.  Fears of a looming recession and Europe’s usual summer trading lull have also sapped liquidity.

Eurozone Economy:  As shown in the Foreign Releases section in the pdf, S&P Global’s flash composite purchasing managers’ index for August fell to 49.2, as compared with 49.9 in July.  As with most major PMIs, the index is designed so that readings below 50 signal contracting economic activity.  Now that the index has been below that mark for two straight months, it’s becoming clearer that the European economy is indeed slowing and could be on the verge of the recession many analysts are already expecting.

  • The news has helped push the euro down even farther so far this morning.
  • The currency is currently trading at $0.9920, its lowest level in some 20 years.

Hong Kong:  The municipal government reported 6,617 new cases of COVID-19 yesterday, marking the sixth straight day in which the tally topped 6,000.  Officials have also said the city now has multiple transmission chains, raising the prospects of a sharp clampdown under President Xi’s Zero-COVID policy.

U.S. Labor Market:  Teachers at the Columbus School District, the largest in Ohio, have voted to strike over a wide range of issues including classroom sizes, teacher pay, caps on the number of class periods in the day, and heating and air conditioning availability in school buildings.  As we’ve noted before, falling labor force participation and fast economic growth have tightened labor markets in many countries, giving workers the leverage to demand better pay and working conditions.  If the wave of strikes drives up labor costs enough, it would help keep inflation high and erode corporate profit margins.

U.S. Apartment Market:  New details show that some 420,000 apartment units are due to be completed in the U.S. this year, marking the highest rate of completions in 50 years.  Initially, many of those new units will likely be snapped up by people shut out of the single-family home market by soaring prices and high interest rates.  Eventually, however, the new units could help bring down rents and inflation rates.

U.S. Military:  As we’ve mentioned previously, U.S. military forces have been facing huge challenges in recruiting new members, with the Army likely to end up with far fewer troops than planned in the next year or two.  Now, it turns out that applications to West Point and the other highly selective, prestigious service academies are down 10% to 30% from last year.  The shortfalls reflect problems ranging from the strong labor market, declining interest in the military after the long U.S. wars in Iraq and Afghanistan, and restrictions on in-person recruiting during much of the pandemic.

View PDF

Daily Comment (August 22, 2022)

by Patrick Fearon-Hernandez, CFA, and Thomas Wash

[Posted: 9:30 AM EDT] | PDF

Our Comment today opens with an update on the Russia-Ukraine war, where very few new territorial gains are being made by either side, but the weekend assassination of a Russian nationalist influencer has sparked concern that Russia may now be forced to intensify its efforts.  We next review a wide range of other international and U.S. developments with the potential to affect the financial markets today, including a few words on this week’s Federal Reserve conference in Jackson Hole, Wyoming, where officials could well push back against the market’s recent optimism about a halt to interest-rate hikes.

Russia-Ukraine:  It now appears that Russia has exhausted its limited offensive capabilities of the last few months, and it is now making very few territorial gains in Ukraine’s eastern Donbas region.  Meanwhile, it continues to dig in against an expected Ukrainian counteroffensive against the areas Russia controls around the southern city of Kherson.  Russia continues to use aircraft, missiles, and long-range artillery to attack targets around Ukraine, but that constitutes most of the damage it’s inflicting for the moment.  At the same time, the Ukrainians continue to leverage precision, long-range artillery and other systems from the West to destroy Russian logistics nodes and troop concentrations.

United Kingdom:  If you thought U.S. consumer prices are rising fast, and even if you thought U.K. prices were rising even faster, you ain’t seen nothing yet!  Analysts at Citigroup (C, $52.61) predict Britain’s consumer price index in January will be up 18.6% year-over-year, mostly due to Europe’s soaring natural gas prices and the planned lifting of price caps on that gas.

  • Such an inflation rate would likely push the U.K. economy deep into recession and force the Bank of England to keep raising interest rates aggressively.
  • Rising energy prices are also putting pressure on Foreign Minister Truss and Former Chancellor Sunak to spell out policies to address the cost-of-living crisis as they continue to campaign to succeed Boris Johnson as Conservative Party leader and prime minister.
  • In addition to rising energy costs, the U.K. is also facing a wave of strikes as workers leverage the tight labor market to demand higher pay and better working conditions.  Today, barristers in the country’s criminal court system voted to go on strike beginning September 5, joining transport and other workers who have staged walkouts.  If the strikes lead to higher wage costs, they will also contribute to rising price pressures.

China:  As is normal shortly after the People’s Bank of China cuts interest rates, as it did last week, commercial banks in China have implemented a series of modest prime-rate cuts on commercial and household loans.  The biggest cut was in the benchmark five-year mortgage rate, which was reduced from 4.45% to 4.30%.  However, the rate cuts are quite modest and are not expected to give any major boost to the economy.

  • While China has reopened from the most recent COVID lockdowns, the economy is still facing serious headwinds from pandemic uncertainty, government crackdowns on property development and technology, and other factors.
  • Southwestern China also continues to face a debilitating drought and heatwave, which has reduced hydroelectric production and prompted the government to impose energy conservation rules.

China-Taiwan-Japan:  Following a number of high-profile visits to Taiwan by U.S. lawmakers to show their support for the island democracy, a delegation of Japanese parliament members has begun a similar three-day trip to Taipei today.  The Japanese visit underscores how Tokyo has thrown its weight behind the U.S.’s effort to counter China’s growing geopolitical aggressiveness in the region.

Pakistan:  Former Prime Minister Khan has been charged with terrorism offenses after a weekend political rally in which he warned that his supporters “won’t spare” the officials from current Prime Minister Sharif’s government who were responsible for detaining Shahbaz Gill, one of his allies, earlier this month.  Khan’s supporters are seeing the charges as an attempt to silence Khan politically.  The rising tensions threaten to produce further political instability in Pakistan.

United States-South Korea:  Today, for the first time in four years, the U.S. and South Korea will begin more than a week of live military exercises together.  The joint drills will signal stronger cooperation between the two allies as the threats from China and North Korea increase, although they will also likely increase tensions with those two countries.

Canada:  Prime Minister Trudeau’s government is proposing that farmers cut their use of fertilizers in order to reduce their emissions 30% from 2020 levels by 2030, with those refusing to do so facing reduced eligibility for green investment incentives.  Although the government so far isn’t facing the intense backlash seen in the Netherlands when its government proposed new farming rules to reduce greenhouse gas emissions, farmers and farm-dependent provinces in Canada are pushing back strongly against the proposal.

U.S. Monetary Policy:  The Kansas City FRB opens its annual conference in Jackson Hole, Wyoming, starting on Wednesday, and investors are bracing for the possibility that Fed Chair Powell and other policymakers will push back against the recent market optimism over the possibility of a pivot toward interest-rate cuts.  Stock futures, bonds, cryptocurrencies, and a range of commodities are trading weaker this morning, while the dollar is up.  In addition, the euro has fallen back below parity, recently trading around $0.9900.

U.S. Education Policy:  In an interview yesterday, Education Secretary Cardona called on school districts to provide more competitive salaries to teachers, improve their working conditions, and give them a greater voice in school administrative decisions.  That follows on the Biden administration’s call for school districts to help alleviate the national teacher shortage by providing pay increases with part of the money they received last year from the administration’s pandemic relief program, although many Republicans want to alleviate the shortage by loosening teacher licensing standards.

View PDF

Asset Allocation Bi-Weekly – The Inflation Surprise (August 22, 2022)

by the Asset Allocation Committee | PDF

July inflation came in below expectations.  On a yearly basis, the market expected an overall rate of 8.7%, while the actual reading was 8.5%.  For core CPI, the actual was 5.9% compared to expectations of 6.1%.  Perhaps the most bullish part of the report was the monthly change, where the overall rate was unchanged compared to June and the core rose by 0.3% compared to expectations of a 0.5% rise.  This was the first monthly reading for the overall rate that was zero or less since May 2020.

The reaction of financial markets was swift and bullish.  The S&P 500 rose over 2% on Wednesday, August 10.  The dollar fell, commodities mostly rose, and the short end of the yield curve rallied.  Why the strong reaction?  The July data was the first time in months we have seen a modest rise in inflation and there is hope that we may be past “peak inflation.”  This hope may be fulfilled.  It’s clear the U.S. economy is slowing and there is evidence that supply chains are slowly improving.

Is this optimism justified?  Although the news on inflation was positive, comparing the policy rate relative to CPI and unemployment suggests the FOMC still has a long way to go before achieving a neutral rate.

In the above chart, the independent variable is CPI less the unemployment rate.  The blue line shows the difference from the model’s estimation of what the policy rate should be based on the difference between CPI and unemployment.  Since 1957, the Federal Reserve has never conducted a policy this easy.  Although recent tightening has somewhat narrowed the gap, the FOMC needs to see either a rise in unemployment or a sharp drop in inflation.

Financial markets, in contrast, are anticipating an end to this tightening cycle.  Comparing the implied interest rate from the Eurodollar futures market, two years into the future, suggests the Fed will be easing in the coming months.

Eurodollar futures are already projecting a lower rate over the next two years.  We have not reached the extremes of earlier tightening cycles, but another rate hike of 50 bps will push the deviation into easing territory.

So, why the difference in the two models?  The financial markets are anticipating a change in economic conditions, either falling inflation, rising unemployment, or both.  Why?  In part, it’s because the financial markets are anticipating recessionary conditions.  For example, the yield curve has inverted.   The chart below depicts a study that looks at 10 different Treasury yield curves.  History shows that when more than six of these curves invert, a recession occurs, on average, in 15 months.  In July, eight of the curves inverted.  As an aside, note that it is common for these curves to steepen after the inversion but before the recession develops.  One should not take any comfort in fewer yield curves inverting once we exceed six.

What is unknown is how fast inflation will fall or unemployment will rise.  Our concern is that the financial markets are anticipating a rapid adjustment in the first chart’s indicator that may not be borne out by the data.  If that outcome occurs, the FOMC may tighten more than the market expects and maintain that tightness longer than anticipated.  That outcome would likely be negative for equities, but for now, hopes of falling inflation and an easing response from policymakers have lifted risk assets.  If this positive outcome fails to materialize, a downturn in risk assets is likely.

View PDF

 

Daily Comment (August 19, 2022)

by Patrick Fearon-Hernandez, CFA, and Thomas Wash

[Posted: 9:30 AM EDT] | PDF

Today’s Comment begins with a discussion concerning central bank policies and how they may help foreign currencies to appreciate against the dollar. Next, we review whether the U.S. and China’s power struggle in Asia could benefit U.S. firms with domestic operations. We end the report with our thoughts about the latest developments in the Russia-Ukraine conflict.

Central Bank News: Mixed messages from the Fed regarding whether it will keep raising rates next year could allow foreign currencies to appreciate against the dollar.

  • There is a split among Fed members about whether the central bank should raise rates until inflation is firmly under control or raise rates into restrictive territory and pause. In the former camp, Minneapolis Federal Reserve Bank President Neel Kashkari, the most hawkish member of the Fed, asserted that the central bank needs to urgently bring down inflation and has hinted that a recession may be necessary in order to restore price stability. Kansas City Fed President Esther George stated that the pace of hikes is debatable but that ending tightening before inflation has fallen is not. In the latter camp, San Francisco Fed President Mary Daly and St. Louis President James Bullard argued that the bank should raise rates but be cautious not to overdo it.
    • If the U.S. falls into a recession, the Fed could be pressured to back off on raising rates. As a result, some policymakers may be uncomfortable with committing to raising rates in 2023 for fear of political backlash.
  • The Bank of Japan will maintain its ultra-loose monetary policy even as inflation rises above its target of 2 percent. In July, headline CPI rose 2.61% from the prior year, its fastest pace in almost eight years. The bank’s insistence on maintaining an accommodative policy is due to the country’s excessive debt burden. If it allowed rates to rise by lifting its yield cap, the government would have more difficulty servicing its interest payments. Additionally, the drop in energy prices has allowed the yen to slightly appreciate against the dollar from its yearly low in July. As a result, the central bank will likely not change its monetary stance anytime soon.
    • Despite the strong reading, inflation in Japan is still relatively low compared to the rest of the world. As the chart below indicates, Inflation rose 1.2% from the prior year when energy and food are excluded.

  • Speculators predict that the policy rate of the Bank of England will surpass that of the Federal Reserve in one to three years. In July, U.K. headline CPI rose 10.1% from the prior year, while U.S. inflation was 8.6% in that same period. The increased inflation rate suggests that the BOE will need to become more hawkish in order to control inflation. The Bloomberg implied market rate shows that the BOE could lift its rate to 3.75% and cut after that.

The U.S. dollar value surged against other currencies throughout 2021 and 2022 due to the country’s relatively strong economic growth and hawkish monetary policy. This dollar strength could ease, however, as the American economy slows, and the Fed relaxes policy tightening. This outcome will benefit commodity-reliant countries like Japan and provide a tailwind for firms with significant foreign revenue exposure.

Asia News: The U.S. and China’s power struggle continues to play out in Asia.

  • The U.S. and China continue to bicker over access to the Taiwan Strait. South Korea and the U.S. will participate in joint military exercises next week. During these activities, the countries will navigate their ships through the strait. China considers movement within the Taiwanese waters as a provocation, claiming the body of water represents Chinese territory. The dispute over transit routes is an example of escalating tensions between the two major powers. As a result, we suspect that the decoupling between the U.S. and China will continue and could be detrimental to U.S. firms with revenue and supply chain exposure in China and Taiwan.
  • Against U.S. wishes, Russian President Vladimir Putin will attend the G-20 meeting in Bali. The White House has pushed Indonesia to exclude Russia due to its invasion of Ukraine. Indonesia’s decision to allow Putin to participate in the summit is another example of how countries are attempting to remain neutral in the rivalry between major powers. In the short term, the nonaligned countries may benefit from competition from major powers trying to win over their support. Indonesia, for example, recently secured wheat supply from Russia while maintaining U.S. military presence in the Pacific. However, this strategy isn’t perfect. During the cold war, nonaligned countries could not prevent proxy battles from breaking out in nearby regions. Therefore, the neutrality of countries could lead to more instability in Asia.
    • On an unrelated note, Indonesia is considering an export tax on nickel. The levy will weigh on automakers’ profit as the commodity is essential for EV batteries, and Indonesia is the largest producer of this metal. By imposing a tax, the government hopes to convince car companies to build factories in Indonesia.
  • The U.S. warned North Korea against performing another nuclear test. The warning came soon after North Korea launched two cruise missiles off its west coast. The country’s rapid improvement in its military capabilities raises the prospect of a war on the Korean peninsula. Although China does not support the nuclearization of North Korea, it has improved its trade relationship with Pyongyang in light of recent weapons tests. The conflict in Korea is likely the second most significant geopolitical event in Asia and threatens to add to the global supply chain worries on the continent. We will be monitoring this situation closely.

Competition between the U.S. and China threatens firms’ ability to operate in Asia. As tensions continue to rise throughout the continent, firms could also struggle to find ways to make both sides happy. Although nonaligned countries appear to be a haven for firms looking to remain neutral, relocating to these areas will be risky. This outcome could benefit American companies with operations solely in the U.S.

Russia-Ukraine update: The cost of the war is rising, but a reshuffling in European governments could pave the way for an end to the war.

  • Russian officials may shut down the main nuclear plant in Ukraine on Friday. Russia has warned that it needs to switch off the power plant to prevent a human-made disaster due to the war. However, Ukrainian officials argued that the plant shut down is related to Russia wanting to stage a large-scale provocation that could lead to a nuclear disaster. Such an incident could threaten to create an international crisis.
  • Italians expect Russian interference in the upcoming parliamentary elections in September. Russian officials have urged Europeans to push out elected officials that support Ukrainian war efforts. The possibility of interference will likely undermine the election’s credibility and could lead people to stay home. That said, Italy’s right-wing bloc appears to be in a prime position to take over the government after the election. Although the leader of the most popular party, Giorgia Meloni, supports Ukraine, other parties within the right-wing bloc, such as the Forza Italia and the League, do not. As a result, it is possible that Italy could weaken its support for Ukraine after the election.
    • Ukraine needs the support of the West to maintain its war effort. If European countries begin to pull their support of Ukraine, it may be forced into accepting an unfavorable peace deal with Russia. The end of the war would be favorable to risk assets.

Wars are unpredictable and the conflict in Ukraine is no different. The potential of a nuclear disaster may force an international response and hurt global economic growth. The Chernobyl nuclear disaster not only impacted people but also contaminated forest and farmland and led to deformed livestock. That said, political shifts in Europe may help Russia change the tide of the war in its favor. At this time, we still view Europe to be a risky place to invest.

View PDF

Daily Comment (August 18, 2022)

by Patrick Fearon-Hernandez, CFA, and Thomas Wash

[Posted: 9:30 AM EDT] | PDF

Today’s Comment is split into two sections. In the first half, we explain why speculation about a Fed pivot is premature. We briefly summarize the meeting minutes, show the market’s reaction, and discuss how the strong jobs market will affect the central bank’s decision to raise rates. In the second half, we review reports indicating that regional bloc formation can change over time. We discuss India’s military exercises with U.S. rivals China and Russia, Beijing’s reaction to the U.S. trade negotiations with Taiwan, and Turkey’s growing disenchantment with the West. After each section, we provide a synopsis of the stories covered and their possible ramifications.

 Central Bank News: Meeting minutes revealed the Fed’s openness to a pivot, but employment and inflation data suggest that monetary tightening is still needed.

  • The Federal Reserve meeting minutes reinforced the market’s dovish perception of the central bank. Although Fed officials agreed unanimously to raise rates by 75 bps at the July 27 Federal Open Market Committee meeting, the minutes revealed that policymakers were also concerned about the economy. Fed officials noted that specific interest-rate-sensitive sectors, such as housing, were hurt by higher rates and warned the impact would spread into other areas of the economy. Additionally, it mentioned that some officials could support a pause once the rates reach the restrictive territory.
  • Investor optimism that the Fed will end its tightening cycle before achieving its 2% target is misguided. On Wednesday, the S&P 500 pared back most of the day’s losses, Treasury yields dipped, and the dollar fell from the day’s high. The market’s reaction suggests that a recession will force the Fed to change its policy path. However, the minutes revealed the central bank is only focused on achieving its dual mandate of price stability and low unemployment.
  • Prediction of policy moderations is overblown. The Fed would like the labor market to show tangible signs of deterioration before it ends its tightening cycle. The July employment payrolls report exceeded expectations, and the unemployment rate dropped from 3.6% to 3.5%. The Fed fears that an overly tight labor market leads to wage pressure, thus contributing to inflation. As a result, it is unlikely to stop raising rates as long as inflation remains high, and the unemployment rate is low.
    • Another reason for our skepticism of a Fed halt or reversal in its policy path is real fed funds. The Fed has never stopped tightening with a negative real Fed funds rate, which stands at -6.82% as of August 10. The Fed would need to raise rates almost 700 bps before the real Fed funds returned to positive territory.

The period of ultra-low inflation has likely passed, but it was good while it lasted. Although the Federal Reserve remains optimistic that slower economic growth will eventually resolve supply chain issues, we are not. Ongoing geopolitical tensions in Europe and Asia will make firms rethink their supply chains. Relatively safe countries that are friendly to the U.S. will be attractive destinations for firms looking to move their operations. That said, in the short run, labor will be able to extract higher wages from their employers, especially as the U.S. unemployment rate remains low. As a result, we believe investors should position themselves to adjust to a higher interest rate and inflation environment.

Geopolitical Tensions: Regional blocs are forming in ways that are hard to predict in the long run.

  • U.S. ally India will join China, Russia, and Belarus for joint military exercises. India’s participation highlights the delicate balance countries are playing not to align with major power blocs. Its decision to play both sides isn’t without precedence. India was one of the founding members of the nonalignment movement during the cold war. The U.S. has recently turned a blind eye to India’s buying of Russian fuel and weapons. However, it isn’t clear if they will continue to do so indefinitely. The U.S. has built closer ties with India as a way to isolate China in the Indo-Pacific region. If it turns out that India is cozying up to China, the U.S. could back away and look for an alternative country to challenge China’s dominance within the region.
    • India has been a significant foreign direct investment target over the last two years. Firms have relocated manufacturing and service operations to the country due to its vast labor market and relatively low costs. If India’s relationship with the U.S. begins to sour, it could force firms to change tactics and look elsewhere.
  • The U.S. continues to annoy China with its flirtation with Taiwanese recognition. The White House plans to hold trade discussions with Taiwan in the fall of this year. The talks have angered China, which views the gesture as another attempt to undermine its sovereign claim over the self-governing island. Although the negotiations are unlikely to lead to conflict, they may pave the way for further escalation. Hence, the possibility of a direct confrontation between the two major powers remains elevated. Firms with considerable revenue exposure or deep supply chains within China or Taiwan may be at risk.
    • Despite the dangers, European firms are still investing in China. Financial inflows from Europe increased 15% in the first half of  2022 compared to a year earlier. The increased investment suggests that firms are prioritizing short-term gains over long-term security.
  • Internal rivalries within the Western military alliance threaten the group’s commitment to supporting Ukraine. To the annoyance of Ankara, Greece has played a central role in the U.S.’s ability to transport weapons to the Ukrainians. The Mediterranean nations have a long and heated rivalry, including conflict over Cyprus and other territorial disputes. Turkey fears its ties with the U.S. are threatened by Greece’s growing importance in the war. The growing closeness between the U.S. and Greece can partially explain why Turkey has built closer economic relations with Russia. The breakdown of the Western alliance will likely make it harder for Ukraine to maintain its war efforts and could pave the way for the war’s conclusion. Any end to the conflict will be taken positively by markets.

The reshuffling of allies is not unusual during times of war. During World War II, Italy notoriously declared war on its former Axis partner Germany. Therefore, as regional blocs start to form, we do expect that certain countries could decide to switch sides or choose to fly solo. Over the last few weeks, we have been paying close attention to the European Union. Although it has historical and economic ties with the U.S., its reliance on Russian energy and its exposure to China shows its interests are not fully aligned with its American counterparts. We are not predicting a break of ties but rather that the two regions may push for separate aims. If we are correct, the lack of foreign policy cohesion between the U.S. and Europe could severely complicate firms’ ability to operate in different countries.

View PDF

Weekly Energy Update (August 18, 2022)

by Bill O’Grady, Thomas Wash, and Patrick Fearon-Hernandez, CFA | PDF

Crude oil prices remain under pressure on fears of a deal with Iran and weakening economic growth.

(Source: Barchart.com)

Crude oil inventories fell 7.1 mb compared to a 0.3 mb build forecast.  The SPR declined 3.4 mb, meaning the net draw was 10.2 mb.

In the details, U.S. crude oil production was steady at 12.2 mbpd.  Exports rose 2.9 mb, while imports were unchanged.  Refining activity dipped 0.8% to 93.5% of capacity.

(Sources: DOE, CIM)

The above chart shows the seasonal pattern for crude oil inventories.  Clearly, this year is deviating from the normal path of commercial inventory levels although this week’s outsized decline is consistent with seasonal behavior.  We will approach the usual seasonal trough for inventories in mid-September.

Since the SPR is being used, to some extent, as a buffer stock, we have constructed oil inventory charts incorporating both the SPR and commercial inventories.

Total stockpiles peaked in 2017 and are now at levels last seen in 2004.  Using total stocks since 2015, fair value is $104.45.

With so many crosscurrents in the oil markets, we are beginning to see some degree of normalization.  The inventory/EUR model suggests oil prices should be around $64 per barrel, so we are seeing about $24 of risk premium in the market.

Market news:

 Geopolitical news:

 Alternative energy/policy news:

  • With the Inflation Reduction Act now signed into law, a backlash against economists for pushing for a carbon tax is developing. To some extent, this makes sense as using other tools can be more politically popular.  However, from an efficiency standpoint, a carbon tax would still be a superior policy, but obviously, if you can’t get it passed, holding on to that policy to the exclusion of all others makes little sense.  What the bill is really all about is industrial policy.  Government shaping the economy is nothing new but is generally considered legitimate only in cases of clear market failure.  Since a carbon tax was never implemented, it really hasn’t been proven that a market failure exists.
  • There is great excitement in the environmental community over the new measures but one potential concern is the lack of workers to build out the plan.
  • Germany is extending the life of its three remaining nuclear power plants.
  • Any commodity activity disturbs something. Whether its drilling, ranching, farming, or mining, something or someone gets disturbed.  As demand for lithium rises, opposition to mining or brining has emerged.  Although such opposition may be overcome, higher costs are likely to result.
  • As we noted last week, the price of EVs continues to climb. Ford’s (F, $16.18) announcement of substantial price increases on its F-150 “Lightning” EV pickup is the most recent example of this issue.
  • There is growing evidence that the Arctic is warming faster than other parts of the world. The impact is difficult to estimate, but we would expect greater weather variability from this situation.
  • Much of the Midwest, parts of the Southwest, Florida, and the Atlantic coast could become subject to extreme heat events in the coming decades. But the real worry is heat in areas unprepared. The linked map shows the areas of installed air conditioning.
  • Hot weather just isn’t an inconvenience. The drought and warm weather is affecting industrial activity in Germany.  In China, power shortages, caused by hot weather, are causing car and battery plants to suspend operations.  Tech firms have also temporarily shut down.
  • Delays of utility-scale solar projects are steadily rising. These delays may be tied to trade restrictions which have recently been eased.
  • California looks ready to extend the life of the Diablo Canyon nuclear power plant that was scheduled for decommissioning.
  • Increasingly, we are seeing an “all of the above” strategy in energy investment. Investing in renewables doesn’t necessarily preclude investing in fossil fuels.
  • Although wood burning is not necessarily environmentally friendly, it appears Germans are considering it in the face of rising fossil fuel prices. Wood pellets are also seeing rising demand in Europe and Asia.
  • This recent report from the Peterson Institute details China’s dominance in rare earths processing.

  View PDF

Daily Comment (August 16, 2022)

by Patrick Fearon-Hernandez, CFA, and Thomas Wash

[Posted: 9:30 AM EDT] | PDF

Our Comment today opens with an update on the Russia-Ukraine war, where the Russians continue to face troop constraints and the Ukrainians continue to find success in attacking Russian troop concentrations and logistical nodes.  We next review a wide range of other international and U.S. developments with the potential to affect the financial markets today.

Russia-Ukraine:  Russian forces continue to make small, incremental territorial gains in the eastern Donbas region of Ukraine, but we are seeing more reports of conscripts from one ethnic Russian part of the region refusing to fight other ethnic Russian parts.  The reports are consistent with other signs that Moscow’s troop depletion and reliance on a hodgepodge of volunteers and other less-qualified troops have left it with a relatively ineffective fighting force.  Adding to morale problems, there are also reports that Moscow is failing to pay some Russian reservists and volunteers fighting in Ukraine.  Meanwhile, Ukrainian officials urged civilians around the Russian-occupied southern city of Kherson to evacuate so Kyiv’s forces could continue ramping up their counteroffensive to retake the area.

European Energy Market:  As the EU looks for ways to cut its reliance on Russian energy, bloc officials are reportedly considering the possibility of lowering regulatory barriers to the mining and production of critical green energy materials such as lithium, cobalt, and graphite.  While it appears that any such deregulation of mining is still off in the future, even the consideration of such an idea seems to illustrate just how desperate EU leaders are to shore up their energy security.

Germany:  The ZEW Institute’s closely watched index of investor expectations fell to an 11-year low of -55.3, down from -53.8 last month.  Against the backdrop of the Ukraine war, surging energy costs, and rising inflation, the figures suggest investors are now more pessimistic about the German economy than they have been at any time since the Eurozone debt crisis more than a decade ago.

United Kingdom:  The Office of National Statistics reported that second quarter real wages fell by a seasonally adjusted 3.0%, marking their steepest decline in at least two decades.  According to the report, nominal pay rose 4.7% in the quarter, but that rise was more than wiped out by increased consumer prices.  As energy and other prices rise faster than wage gains, similar declines in real wages are being reported in countries across the globe.

China:  Property developers’ stocks have risen sharply today on rumors that the government will instruct state-owned institutions to guarantee their domestic bonds.  If true, the new government support would likely be targeted toward helping the developers complete homes that have already been paid for but not yet finished or delivered.  That could help stabilize China’s housing market and weaken one of the headwinds facing the Chinese economy, but the country and its financial markets would still face a range of challenges, such as unpredictable, draconian pandemic lockdowns, a regulatory crackdown on its technology industry, and fracturing trade and investment ties with the West.

Australia:  In what could be a major new scandal, Former Prime Minister Scott Morrison has been accused of secretly appointing himself as head of five separate ministries during the coronavirus pandemic.  Morrison has tried to defend himself by arguing that the moves were necessary to cut the risk of ministers contracting COVID-19 during the pandemic, but he is being widely pilloried for undermining democracy and government accountability, even by members of his own opposition Liberal Party.

Kenya:  Deputy President William Ruto has been declared the winner of last week’s presidential election with 50.5% of the vote, but his main rival’s supporters and some election commissioners are disputing the result.  The risk is that Kenya could be thrown into yet another round of political unrest and violence, adding to the overall instability sparked by rising commodity prices and high interest rates in many emerging markets.

U.S. Bond Market:  New analysis shows that just 6.2% of U.S. junk bonds are now trading at distressed levels, down from 11.6% as recently as early July.  The new study, which defines “distressed” bonds as those trading at a yield greater than 10.0% above comparable U.S. Treasury obligations, illustrates just how dramatically investors have jumped back into the junk bond market as they’ve come to expect the Fed will pivot to interest rate cuts as early as 2023.

U.S. Technology Trade:  In a potential scandal in the U.S., a new analysis shows that a Commerce Department-led process meant to review sensitive technology exports to China approves almost all requests and hasn’t stopped an increase in the sales of some particularly important technologies.  As a result, the U.S. continues to send to China an array of semiconductors, aerospace components, artificial-intelligence technology, and other items that could be used to advance Beijing’s military development.

  • Given that being tough on China is now a political necessity for both Republicans and Democrats, it would not be a surprise if the news prompts tightened restrictions.
  • The news therefore presents new regulatory risks for U.S. technology and aerospace firms that could be forced to cut their sales to China.

U.S. Agriculture Market:  Faced with a withering drought, cotton growers in the Southwest are abandoning up to 40% of the acres that they planted in spring, prompting forecasts for the weakest U.S. harvest in more than a decade and sending prices sharply higher.  Cotton futures prices rose some 13% in the last week, ending Monday at approximately $1.136 per pound.

View PDF

Asset Allocation Bi-Weekly – The Devil Is in the Details (August 8, 2022)

by the Asset Allocation Committee | PDF

U.S. policymakers used deregulation and globalization to corral inflation from 1966 to 1982.  Unfortunately, that policy was at odds with America’s superpower role, which required the U.S. to act as global importer of last resort.  If the U.S. didn’t consume all the goods the world wanted to sell to Americans, the world economy would face a liquidity crisis.  Policymakers addressed the issues of containing inflation and providing global liquidity by deregulating financial services, which made it easier for households to borrow money.  Although deregulation and globalization slowed real income growth, the ability to borrow allowed households to absorb global imports, holding the international system together.  After 1995, this lending was increasingly attached to residential real estate, which was considered safe.  Sadly, one of the key economic imbalances that was revealed during the Great Financial Crisis was excessive household debt.  Since the crisis, the economy has been trying to address this debt overhang.  There has been some progress as household debt peaked at 129.4% of after-tax income in Q1 2008 but fell to 84.4% in Q1 2021.  Since then, it has risen to 96.5%.

Although policymakers haven’t targeted this issue, we believe that addressing this debt situation is not only key to improving the health of the economy, but the austerity required to reduce debt may be a factor behind political polarization.  The last time the U.S. had a similar debt issue was in the late 1920s when the Great Depression was the resolution, although the situation wasn’t fully addressed until WWII.  From a financial perspective, WWII finally resolved the private sector debt problem by placing that debt on the public balance sheet.  The debt relative to the size of the economy was reduced on the public balance sheet through financial repression.

One of the difficulties in discussing debt is proper scaling; in other words, how do we know when debt is “too high”?  Economists often use nominal GDP or some sort of income measure to scale debt.  The problem is that both GDP and income are “flow” data, meaning that they measure a quantity calculated over a period of time, while debt is “stock” data, which is a level at a specific time.  In terms of debt, income or GDP may or may not tell us much about the ability to service the debt.

Accounting often creates ratios that measure stock or flows.  For example, assets divided by liabilities are two stock numbers that give us some idea about the balance sheet of a firm or household.  Clearly, if the assets exceed liabilities, it suggests solvency.

From 1970 to 1990, American households had more cash than debt.[1]  After 1990, household leverage rose, peaking with debt exceeding cash to the tune of nearly $6.0 trillion.  The difference narrowed after the Great Financial Crisis by more than 50%.  The huge injection of fiscal aid to households during the COVID-19 pandemic finally led to cash exceeding debt for the first time in three decades.

So, have we resolved the household debt problem?  Perhaps, but the Federal Reserve’s Distributional Financial Accounts, which examines household balance sheets by income, suggests that the debt situation hasn’t necessarily been fixed.

We divide households into three groups: the top 10%, the middle 40%, and the bottom 50%.  The top 10% has seen its cash levels rise relative to debt for most of this century, but this difference widened dramatically during the pandemic.  Since the upper income brackets were mostly excluded from direct cash payments, it’s likely that this group liquidated appreciated assets.  We do note that all three classes took on more debt, but in the case of the top 10%, the cash accumulation far exceeded these new liabilities.  The middle 40% saw cash rise relative to debt into Q1 2021, but over the past year, liabilities grew modestly relative to debt.  However, for the bottom 50%, net debt continued to rise even with the influx of pandemic transfer payments.

We don’t have a data series by income prior to 1989, so we can’t compare what occurred during and after WWII, but, given the high marginal tax rates of that period, we suspect that the lower income classes saw their balance sheets improve.  What can we take away from the above chart?  First, as interest rates rise, consumption may fall since the bottom 50% increased their leverage during the pandemic.  Consumption will then have to come from the upper 50%.  Second, given the massive cash balances of the top 10%, asset prices could find support in the coming months.  Although higher cash yields from rising interest rates might keep this cash on the sidelines, we suspect this level of cash will eventually find its way into the equity, commodity, and debt markets.  This flow may depend on signs that the FOMC is near the end of its tightening cycle, but once such a catalyst emerges, the conditions for a strong financial market recovery are in place.  The great unknown, of course, is which market the potential flows will favor.

View PDF


[1] This dataset, from the FRB’s Financial Accounts of the U.S., includes households plus non-profits that service households.  Thus, strictly speaking, this isn’t just households, but data suggests the non-profit contribution is relatively minor.

Daily Comment (August 5, 2022)

by Patrick Fearon-Hernandez, CFA, and Thomas Wash

[Posted: 9:30 AM EDT] | PDF

Today’s Comment starts with a focus on the potential spillover effects of Russia’s invasion of Ukraine. Next, we examine policymakers’ dilemma of whether to promote growth or contain inflation. We conclude by discussing a possible rightward shift in U.S. policy.

Russia: The Ukraine war could potentially lead to new conflicts in other parts of Europe and the Middle East.

  • NATO Secretary-General Jens Stoltenberg stated that the Ukraine war was the most dangerous moment in Europe since WWII and that Russia must not win it. He also suggested that NATO might act if Russia seeks to extend its military campaign into an allied country. His comments appear to be a veiled threat to Moscow not to provoke a NATO ally. Although the Kremlin has not directly mentioned another country, there are concerns that Russia could incite a war over Kosovo, a non-aligned country with NATO forces.
  • Tensions in Eurasia pose a threat to the continent’s delicate commodity supply. Azerbaijan has reignited tensions with Armenia over the heavily contested Nagorno-Karabakh. On Thursday, Azerbaijan forces took over a strategic region in the disputed territory. While Moscow has forces stationed in the area to prevent clashes, the war in Ukraine has made Russia’s presence less effective. Thus, Azerbaijan’s advancement in Nagorno-Karabakh exemplifies how tensions between rival countries within Eurasia could heighten as war continues in Ukraine. Although many countries in Eurasia are typically ignored, disruptions in the region could make it harder for firms to secure natural resources. As a result, these conflicts could exacerbate the energy crisis in Europe.
  • Vladimir Putin is expected to meet with Turkish President Recep Tayyip Erdoğan in Sochi on Friday. The two leaders will discuss the ongoing situation in Syria. Turkey would like to mount a military offensive against Kurdish fighters within Syria without worrying about a possible conflict with Russian troops stationed in the area. Because Turkey is a NATO ally, a conflict with the Russian military could lead to a broader conflict that includes other members of the security pact.

A broader war in Europe would rattle financial markets and could make commodity supply concerns deeply entrenched. As a result, we expect European firms may look to set up operations in areas that are resource-rich and relatively safe, like the U.S. and Canada.

Inflation worries: Around the world, governments struggle to determine whether they should prioritize inflation or GDP growth when creating new economic policy.

  • Chinese Premier Li Keqiang implied that the government would tolerate GDP growth rates below its target as long as inflation and unemployment stay under 3.5% and 5.5%, respectively. Like the rest of the world, China is seeing an increase in consumer prices. In June, headline CPI rose 2.43% from the prior year, its highest jump in over a decade. Keqiang’s remarks suggest that Beijing is reluctant to inject fiscal stimulus into the economy due to concerns that it might worsen inflation. The lack of government support in China will weigh on global growth.
  • In the U.K., Liz Truss, the frontrunner candidate for prime minister, directed her ire at the Bank of England and the Treasury for the country’s inflation problem. Although the BOE was the first major central bank to raise interest rates after the pandemic, Truss insists that it should have acted even sooner. Her criticism of the BOE suggests that she may favor eliminating the central bank’s independence. In a speech at a husting of Conservative party members, Truss hinted at changing the BOE’s mandate to align more closely with the other central banks. Her rebuke suggests that she will likely place the blame for inflation on the central bank in order to gain support for her tax cut proposal.
  • In Europe, countries are looking to implement measures designed to combat rising inflation. For example, the French Parliament passed legislation on Thursday that would cap rent increases and extend fuel subsidies. Meanwhile, Ireland is considering imposing a windfall tax on energy profits. Government actions to rein in inflation will likely not be too effective because subsidies on fuel and windfall taxes on energy profits prevent consumers and suppliers from adjusting to the market. Fuel subsidies prevent demand destruction, while taxes on excess profits limit energy companies’ ability to expand investment in production capacity.

The decision to address inflation over GDP suggests that governments fear the public may be more sensitive to prices than the economy. This preference could mean countries will be reluctant to stimulate their economies as inflation remains elevated. The lack of financial support from the government during times of economic weakness suggests that any recovery from recession will likely be slow. Thus, we could be headed toward a sustained period of slow economic growth.

U.S. policy: The Democrats may be on the verge of passing another bill, but conservatives still strongly influence domestic and foreign policy.

  • Senator Kyrsten Sinema (D-AZ) has agreed to support the climate and tax bill. Her support came after Democrats revised the legislation to eliminate a provision that would narrow a tax break for carried interest. Additionally, there were provisions to alter the 15% minimum corporate tax and add a 1% excise tax on stock buybacks. The tax changes in the bill may not have a significant impact on investors. Instead, they reflect a broader trend away from government spending as the country copes with rising inflation.
  • The fallout continues following House Speaker Nancy Pelosi’s provocative trip to Taiwan. On Friday, China announced that it would impose sanctions on Pelosi and has halted cooperation with the U.S. in several areas, including talks on climate change and defense. Her visit to Taiwan has not only accelerated the decoupling between the U.S. and China but is also forcing firms to reconsider plans to invest in Taiwan.
    • Equities are already starting to see movement following the trip. Since Pelosi’s visit, stocks related to chipmakers have surged due to predictions that the U.S. and China will invest more in domestically made semiconductors.

There does seem to be relatively more support for conservative policies going into the midterm elections. Democrats who initially pushed for a bill that would have added to the deficit over 10 years are now backing a bill that reduces the deficit, suggesting the country is becoming fiscally cautious. Additionally, Pelosi’s trip reinforces our view that the country is becoming more skeptical of China. It is too soon to say whether this represents a broader trend, but it is something we are monitoring closely.

View PDF