by Patrick Fearon-Hernandez, CFA, and Thomas Wash
[Posted: 9:30 AM ET] | PDF
Our Comment begins with an analysis of the bipartisan push for greater government involvement in AI development. We then examine the growing significance of next year’s Federal Reserve reappointments, followed by a focus on the White House’s embrace of high-skill foreign labor and the ongoing strength in credit card spending. As always, the report includes a comprehensive roundup of key international and domestic data releases.
The Artificial Intelligent State: A bipartisan panel formed under both the Trump and Biden administrations has urgently called for greater government involvement in the economy to strengthen the tech sector, citing critical national security concerns. The group highlighted two major risks: a lack of private investment in strategically important industries and an overreliance on rival nations for key supply chain components. The warning underscores how national security concerns are driving a fundamental rethinking of traditional economic norms.
- The proposed policy represents a sharp departure from the mostly laissez-faire framework that has shaped US economic strategy since the Reagan era. While the 2008 financial crisis exposed the limits of free markets, it was the Biden administration that institutionalized a more active industrial policy, channeling targeted stimulus into strategically vital sectors. This shift was later reinforced and broadened by the Trump administration’s reliance on tariffs to shield domestic producers and promote targeted private investment.
- This bipartisan warning could be foreshadowing the potential for the state to provide loan guarantees to strategically vital firms. The concept of government-backed debt was recently raised by AI companies, notably OpenAI, whose executives have cited colossal commitments to funding billions of dollars in equipment. These massive capital expenditures currently outpace the company’s revenue stream, fueling concerns that a potential default could trigger the bursting of the long-speculated AI bubble.
- While increased government involvement can provide strategic support, it inevitably risks market distortions. One significant concern is the crowding out effect, where large public investments in strategic sectors divert capital, talent, and resources away from other productive areas of the economy. Moreover, this intervention may lead to substantial overcapacity in supported industries, making the broader economy more susceptible to speculative bubbles.
- This dynamic creates a perilous incentive for lawmakers. Having staked their policy — and potentially public funds as well — on the success of strategic sectors like AI, the government has developed a vested interest in ensuring the continued growth of the industry, even if it becomes detached from market fundamentals. While it is uncertain whether this decoupling will persist, the state is likely to attempt to manage the market and possibly artificially prop up valuations to prevent a collapse.
A Dovish Tilt: Atlanta Fed President Raphael Bostic has announced he will retire at the end of his term in February. His decision to forgo reappointment means the Federal Reserve could lose another key hawk from the committee. While Bostic has had a reputation for focusing on the maximum employment side of the Fed’s dual mandate, the unprecedented post-pandemic inflation surge positioned him as a leading voice for keeping interest rates elevated to restore price stability. His departure is therefore likely to open a seat for another dove on the committee.
- Bostic’s exit is part of a broader leadership transition, as the terms for several regional Fed presidents are scheduled to expire next year. The selection process for these roles, which carry five-year terms ending in one or six, involves a vote by local boards but requires final confirmation from the Federal Reserve Board in Washington.
- Traditionally an obscure procedural matter, the appointment of Federal Reserve presidents has now entered mainstream political discourse. This shift is driven by the White House’s ambition to exert more control over monetary policy, raising concerns that the administration may attempt to influence the selection of regional bank presidents by reshaping the Federal Reserve Board itself.
- The White House currently has two reliable allies on the Federal Reserve Board in Governors Stephen Miran and Michelle Bowman. A third, Christopher Waller, could also be considered part of this camp, given his nomination by the current president. A pivotal moment will be the Supreme Court’s January hearing, which will consider the president’s authority to remove a Fed governor. If the Court rules that the president can indeed remove Governor Lisa Cook, then the White House could secure a majority on the Board.
- While the US dollar is influenced by a multitude of factors, from economic growth to financial flows, we believe central bank policy is among the most critical. Any perception that the Federal Reserve is losing its independence could significantly weaken the dollar, prompting investors to diversify into gold and other currencies. This scenario would also likely provide a substantial tailwind for international equities.
H1-B Visas Good? President Trump indicated that H-1B visas could help address critical talent shortages in key industries. His comments may signal an imminent trade agreement with India, a key source of skilled immigrant labor, and more strategically, acknowledge that recruiting top global talent is essential for winning the international AI race. This stance aligns with the tech sector’s long-standing argument that a scarcity of skilled domestic workers has hindered its efforts to reshore production and innovate.
Government Data: The White House has announced that the release of October’s CPI and jobs reports will be suspended due to complications from the government shutdown. This absence of official data will hamper the Fed’s data-dependent approach. To fill this void, the central bank will be forced to rely more heavily on private-sector data, which, although readily available, is generally considered less reliable than official government statistics. Our analysis of current alternative data trends indicates that these conditions warrant a rate cut by the Fed in December.
No More Pennies: The US Mint has announced it will cease production of the penny for public circulation as a cost-cutting measure, marking a symbolic endpoint for a coin whose metal value has long exceeded its one-cent face value. While limited editions will continue for collectors, the move is expected to exacerbate an existing penny shortage. This has prompted calls for legislation to allow cash transactions to be rounded to the nearest five cents, a measure retailers and banks support to avoid potential lawsuits and operational headaches.
More Spending: Recent credit card data from Bank of America indicates that consumer spending accelerated to its fastest pace since early 2024. The report revealed that the increase was broad-based across all income classes, driven largely by a combination of higher wages and elevated inflation. The bank also noted that, despite reports of increased financial restraint, consumer deposit levels remain above pre-pandemic levels. This data reinforces the view that household balance sheets remain stable despite economic headwinds.




