Striving for a Consistent Risk Profile: Quality and Value (October 2026)

Insights from the Value Equities Investment Committee | PDF

“In the short run, the market is a voting machine, but in the long run, it is a weighing machine.” –Benjamin Graham

Advances in AI have captured investors’ imaginations and opened a wide gap between the beneficiaries and the rest of the market. The resulting concentration in mega-cap technology businesses has exposed the limitations of how many “passive” indexes are constructed, and it is a reminder of how fluid their risk profiles can be. It also highlights how differently active managers may define fundamental attributes such as quality and value, and how firmly they adhere to their stated philosophy and process. The late stages of extended market cycles test that commitment, and the end of the cycle reveals it.

At Confluence, one of our key tenets is maintaining a consistent risk profile throughout market cycles by adhering to our philosophy and process. That philosophy was adopted at inception in 1994 at our predecessor firm and remains in place today. It has successfully navigated both the internet boom and bust of the late 1990s and early 2000s and the Global Financial Crisis of 2008-09. It rests on understanding and valuing individual businesses, with an emphasis on owning competitively advantaged companies at attractive prices: quality and value.

Read the full report

A Moving Yardstick: Dynamic Risk Profiles of the Indexes (October 2026)

Insights from the Value Equities Investment Committee | PDF

Benchmark index construction rules generally do not account for fundamentals, underlying quality, or risk management

We’ve written at length about the rules that determine the composition of the style indexes against which many active managers are benchmarked. An index’s composition is a function of mechanical rules, not a stable definition of “value” or “growth.” Those rules cause companies to shuffle in and out of the Growth and Value indexes, and cause weightings to evolve dramatically over short periods, based on market sentiment. As a result, the Russell 1000 Value Index carries a risk profile that can change (and has changed) meaningfully within a single year and could shift again at each style reconstitution in June.

We don’t expect clients to monitor every nuance of index construction methodology. But we do think it is important for advisors to understand just how dynamic a style index’s risk profile really is, particularly since most clients have risk profiles that remain stable from year to year.

Read the full report