by Patrick Fearon-Hernandez, CFA, and Thomas Wash
[Posted: 9:30 AM ET] | PDF
Our Comment begins with an analysis of a potential change to the Fed’s inflation target. We then provide insights on the latest White House investment initiatives aimed at promoting its policy agenda. Additional topics include the possibility of further tariffs, the US’s financial support for Argentina, and the ongoing efforts to resolve the conflict in Gaza. We also provide a summary of recent global and domestic key economic indicators.
Soft Inflation Target? A growing number of Federal Reserve officials have signaled a willingness to consider an inflation target range, moving away from a rigid inflation target. This perspective has been highlighted in recent speeches by Fed Governors Christopher Waller and Michelle Bowman, alongside Atlanta Fed President Raphael Bostic. These comments emerge as the Fed digests the findings of its latest five-year policy framework review, which was completed in August.
- Of the three officials who mentioned a possible change, only Raphael Bostic provided a concrete example. During an appearance on the “Macro Musings” podcast, the Atlanta Fed President suggested he could favor an inflation target range of 1.75% to 2.25%. Under such a framework, the Fed would likely raise interest rates if inflation exceeded the upper limit and lower them if it fell below the lower bound.
- Adopting an inflation target range would represent a significant shift in how most central banks approach their price stability mandate. However, this model has a clear precedent. The Central Bank of Brazil successfully manages inflation with a system that includes a tolerance band of ±1.5 percentage points around its central target, effectively targeting a range from 1.50% to 4.50%.
- Additionally, the adoption of a rigid 2% inflation target was somewhat arbitrary, as the original proposal was a bit vague. The concept was first introduced by Harvard economist Sumner Slichter in a 1952 Harper’s Weekly article, “How Bad Is Inflation?”, where he explicitly proposed a target of 2 or 3%. This was a significant departure from the prevailing economic view that price stability meant inflation should average zero in the long run.
- A move to an inflation target range likely signals concern within the Fed that its current communication is ineffective. A defined range would force more pre-emptive and unambiguous rate adjustments ahead of policy meetings. However, this clarity could well have negative implications for bond markets, as a rules-based approach might limit the Fed’s flexibility in responding to unexpected economic shocks.
New Industrial State: The White House is considering acquiring a 10% stake in Lithium Americas as part of a renegotiation of its $2.3 billion loan from the Department of Energy. This potential move underscores a growing trend of direct government involvement in the economy, specifically aimed at ensuring that the US can become more self-sufficient in developing critical technologies and reducing reliance on foreign supply chains, particularly from China.
- This action is the latest example of growing integration between the public and private sectors. It follows a similar deal with Intel, in which the government also took a 10% share in the company. This emerging practice suggests that the government may be seeking greater control and a direct return on investment for companies receiving significant public funding, especially in sectors deemed critical to national and economic security.
- Beyond government support, companies receiving public backing are also attracting significant private investment. This was demonstrated on Tuesday, when it was reported that Intel, which had already secured a $2 billion investment from SoftBank, is now in talks with Apple for another cash injection. These discussions are part of Intel’s broader strategy to sell its chips to the iPhone maker, as Apple faces growing pressure to reshore much of its manufacturing capacity to the United States.
- The evolving relationship between the government and the private sector points toward greater integration. A probable consequence is a competitive advantage for firms with close government affiliations, which may receive preferential treatment in the form of directed contracts. The long-term risk of this arrangement, however, is a potential decline in operational efficiency for these favored companies, as market discipline may be weakened by guaranteed government support.
New Tariffs: The White House has launched an investigation into imports of robotics, industrial machinery, and medical devices under Section 232 of the Trade Expansion Act. The process, which began on September 2, authorizes the president to impose tariffs on goods deemed critical to national security. While potential tariffs on these specific goods have not been discussed, the president has routinely shown a willingness to use this authority (typically imposing tariffs 50% or higher for specific products) to protect strategically important industries.
Weak Lending Standards: Debt investors are concerned about increasingly lax credit standards following the recent failures of two seemingly healthy companies. This apprehension stems from the collapse of subprime lender Tricolor and car parts supplier First Brands Group filing for bankruptcy, both of which had access to favorable financing before their respective downfalls. While this issue is not expected to trigger a financial crisis, it is raising questions about the financial health and stability of other companies in the market.
Argentine Bailout: The US government has moved to support Argentina and prevent a collapse of its currency. Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent has signaled a willingness to purchase Argentine dollar-denominated bonds and could offer standby credit via the Exchange Stabilization Fund. This action underscores the US dollar’s enduring influence globally, even as its reserve currency status faces challenges. While we maintain a bearish outlook on the dollar, we expect its decline to be volatile.
Gaza Peace Plan: The White House has reportedly presented a 21-point plan to Arab and Muslim leaders aimed at ending the war in Gaza and establishing a post-Hamas government. This diplomatic push comes as the US seeks an urgent resolution to the conflict to focus on other pressing global issues. During the discussions, the US reportedly reassured leaders that it would not permit Israel to annex the West Bank. A peaceful resolution to the Middle East conflict would expectedly help stabilize global oil markets
Energy Policy: A survey from the Federal Reserve Bank of Dallas reveals significant concern within the oil industry that current US government policies are negatively impacting profitability. Industry participants cite the administration’s dual pressures of advocating for lower energy prices while supporting tariffs on essential equipment as major factors compressing margins. This weak sentiment suggests that certain sectors may take longer than expected to adapt to the new policy environment.