Bi-Weekly Geopolitical Report – The Geopolitics of US Dollar Stablecoins (March 9, 2026)

by Bill O’Grady  | PDF

The expansion and regulation of stablecoins have become major policy goals of the Trump administration. This form of cryptocurrency has the potential to dramatically improve the transfer of funds between economic entities and could be a new source of demand for US Treasurys. In this report, we will define what stablecoins are and then examine the evolving regulatory framework, how the emerging stablecoin market relates to monetary and geopolitical history, and the ways in which stablecoins could become a tool of geopolitical power for the US. As always, we will conclude with market ramifications.

What Are Stablecoins?

Cryptocurrencies are currency-like assets that are transferred on permissionless blockchains. This means that a public ledger exists (the blockchain) where a buyer and a seller of a particular cryptocurrency can engineer a transfer without using an existing banking system. Stablecoins are a type of cryptocurrency designed to hold a stable asset value relative to a fiat currency.[1] They differ from Bitcoin, Ethereum, or other cryptocurrencies, as these are not usually tied to any particular asset and thus their prices often fluctuate wildly. The initial use case for stablecoins was to offer holders of traditional cryptocurrencies an “off-ramp” from their cryptocurrency holdings.

Read the full report

Don’t miss our accompanying podcasts, available on our website and most podcast platforms: Apple | Spotify 

Daily Comment (March 9, 2026)

by Patrick Fearon-Hernandez, CFA, and Thomas Wash

[Posted: 9:30 AM ET] | PDF

Our Comment today opens with the big weekend surge in global energy prices, which has pushed Brent crude well above $100 per barrel and threatens to push US gasoline prices above $4.00 per gallon in the coming weeks. We next review several other international and US developments with the potential to affect the financial markets today, including growing tensions between the US and Israel over the conduct of the war and promises by the US administration to quickly develop a system to rebate tariffs that the Supreme Court recently invalidated.

US-Israel-Iran: Citing an unnamed administration official, Axios reported over the weekend that the US and Israel are mulling sending special operations forces into Iran at a later stage in the war to seize the country’s stock of enriched uranium and/or to seize its major oil export terminal on Kharg Island. The moves would aim to end Iran’s current nuclear weapons program and allow long-term control over its oil exports and economy.

  • The risk is that the small special ops forces could find themselves overwhelmed by Iran’s army and other forces. In that case, the pressure would rise for the US and Israel to commit large-scale “boots on the ground.” In turn, that could create further political headwinds for the administration, raising the possibility of the Democrats taking control of at least one chamber of Congress in the November midterm elections.
  • Separately, Iranian clerical leaders over the weekend chose Mojtaba Khamenei, son of the slain previous leader, to be the country’s new supreme leader, defying President Trump’s assertion that the son was not acceptable. The naming of Mojtaba Khamenei as supreme leader is being widely interpreted as a sign that the Iranian leadership will fight to the death rather than capitulate to US and Israeli demands in the war.
  • Separately, the Strait of Hormuz remains essentially closed, throttling shipments of oil, gas, fertilizers, and other commodities and driving up prices for those commodities. Earlier today, Brent crude oil jumped by more than 25% to almost $120 per barrel before pulling back to about $105 per barrel at this writing. Natural gas prices have also surged again today, while gold, silver, and copper prices are modestly lower, probably reflecting concerns about stagflation and elevated interest rates.
  • While the Trump administration has insisted it will not release oil from the US’s strategic petroleum reserve to hold down prices, the International Energy Agency today is coordinating an emergency meeting of finance ministers from the Group of 7 major nations to discuss a joint release of oil from their reserves. Historically, releases from the SPR in times of crisis have helped push oil prices lower.

United States-Israel: One development that has also helped push up energy prices today and rattled financial markets is that Israel attacked 30 of Iran’s fuel storage facilities over the weekend, going far beyond what US officials expected when Tel Aviv informed them of the impending attacks. The Israeli attack could invite Iran to increase its attacks on oil and gas facilities across the region, potentially sparking long-term supply shortages even if the Strait of Hormuz is reopened quickly. The attacks have also increased US-Israeli political tensions.

US Tariff Policy: Ahead of a late Friday meeting between administration lawyers and the federal judge who struck down most of President Trump’s new tariffs, US Customs and Border Protection official Brandon Lord announced that the government will develop a system for returning $166 billion in tariff ‌payments to around 330,000 importers within 45 days. Lord also vowed that the new system would only require minimal submissions from affected companies.

  • If the tariff rebate system is up and running as quickly as promised, it would suggest firms could see a significant influx of cash in the second quarter. Firms could potentially accrue the rebates in the first quarter, raising corporate earnings. In any case, the rebates are likely positive for US stocks.
  • Of course, one issue will be the extent to which firms share the rebates with their customers, either by outright refunds or lower prices going forward.
  • Finally, it’s important to remember that any rebates paid will have a negative impact on the federal budget deficit and debt levels.

US Housing Policy: Senators working on legislation designed to make housing more affordable have inserted a provision that would prohibit large-scale investors from buying existing single family homes and would require them to sell their newly built rental properties to individuals within seven years of completing them. The industry has begun pushing back fiercely against the idea, and it isn’t clear if it will ultimately be signed into law. Nevertheless, it represents a risk to firms aiming to buy and rent out large numbers of homes.

China-Russia: Beijing’s draft five-year plan for 2026-2030 reportedly includes funds for two pipelines transporting natural gas from Russia, suggesting President Putin’s pet project to strengthen China-Russian economic relations, the Power of Siberia 2, could be on the fast track for construction. The pipeline would likely take years to complete, so it won’t make much difference for today’s energy crisis. However, it would likely cement Russia’s role as a key gas supplier for China for years to come.

China: The February consumer price index was up 1.3% year-over-year, beating expectations and accelerating from the 0.2% rise in the year to January. According to the national statistics agency, the acceleration was driven by surging oil prices as tensions around Iran heated up and strong demand around the Lunar New Year holidays. Consumer price inflation is now at its highest in more than three years. However, producer prices continue to fall amid excess production.

Germany: In regional elections in the key industrial state of Baden-Württemberg yesterday, the left-wing Greens narrowly came in first with 30.2% of the vote, edging out Chancellor Merz’s Christian Democrats despite opinion polls showing the CDU would win. Just as important, the far-right Alternative for Germany party nearly doubled its vote share to 18.8%. The results point to a further weakening of the country’s traditional centrist parties.

View PDF

Daily Comment (March 6, 2026)

by Patrick Fearon-Hernandez, CFA, and Thomas Wash

[Posted: 9:30 AM ET] | PDF

Our Comment opens with our views on how the Middle East conflict is shaping the monetary policy outlook. We then provide a brief overview of other key market developments, including state lawsuits seeking to roll back the latest tariffs, new restrictions on chip exports, normalizing ties between the US and Venezuela, and the escalating dispute between the Pentagon and Anthropic. We also include a summary of recent US and international data releases.

Iran and Monetary Policy: The escalating Middle East conflict is clouding the Federal Reserve’s policy path, introducing fresh uncertainty as it threatens to reignite inflation. Heightened tensions are raising alarms over potential global supply chain disruptions, with Brent crude nearing $90 a barrel and US gasoline prices climbing nearly 30 cents since hostilities began. This renewed price pressure has led to concerns that the Fed could pivot from debating when to cut rates to weighing whether hikes are needed to balance supply and demand.

  • Concerns over the potential inflationary impact of the war have already begun to weigh on both the fixed income and currency markets. The 10-year Treasury yield has surged, rising nearly 15 basis points over the last three days to hit a three-week high. Meanwhile, futures markets are rapidly pricing out expectations for rate cuts, with war-induced price pressures now seen as a key factor that could prevent the Federal Reserve from easing policy at all this year.
  • The recent market moves highlight concerns that the war could last longer than initially expected and potentially widen its geographic footprint. Azerbaijan has accused Iran of drone attacks on its territory and demanded explanations from Tehran, underscoring the risk of spillover along Iran’s northern border. At the same time, a US submarine strike that sank an Iranian warship off the coast of Sri Lanka has brought the conflict directly into the Indian Ocean, closer to key shipping routes serving India and Sri Lanka.
  • The conflict has already raised alarms about supply chain disruptions amid slowing trade flows. The Strait of Hormuz, a critical global shipping chokepoint, has already seen traffic sharply curtailed, raising the risk of broader trade bottlenecks. While energy markets have drawn the most attention, regional instability is also affecting other commodities, with industrial metals such as aluminum increasingly vulnerable to being caught in the crosshairs.

  • What the Fed does next will likely hinge on whether the conflict creates a meaningful supply/demand imbalance. If policymakers judge that supply disruptions could trigger a sustained price shock, they may feel compelled to pause rate cuts and even consider another hike. By contrast, if they expect the conflict to be short-lived, with supply normalizing quickly, or if they believe weaker demand will contain inflation without further action, then they may opt to keep policy unchanged.
  • The labor market is likely to be another key factor in whether the Federal Reserve shifts its policy stance. After a weak 2025, when employment recorded the slowest non‑recession job growth in more than two decades, hiring now appears to be stabilizing and gradually improving. If that nascent recovery were to fade, Fed officials could feel pressure to lower rates to support job creation.

  • In our view, the recent conflict and associated risk of a supply shock have likely reduced the scope for rate cuts this year, given the potential for higher input prices to feed into inflation. That said, we still see the possibility for some easing, assuming the conflict is resolved relatively quickly or the labor market slips back toward the pronounced slowdown seen in 2025.

Tariff Troubles: Several US states are pressing the Trump administration to halt the next round of tariffs following the Supreme Court’s decision to overturn the original measures. The pushback comes as the White House seeks alternative ways to ensure trading partners comply with the terms of its trade agreements. This added friction is likely to deepen uncertainty for businesses, which are struggling to assess whether current or proposed tariffs will ultimately remain in place, potentially leading to a period of strategic inertia.

Chip Restrictions: The US is weighing new rules that would further limit where chipmakers can do business. Under draft regulations from the Commerce Department, exports of certain chips would be restricted to destinations that have not received explicit approval from the White House. Although not yet final, the proposal could effectively curb the sale of most high‑end AI accelerators. The move underscores the government’s growing role in shaping the broader economy.

‘Don’roe Doctrine: The US and Venezuela have officially restored diplomatic ties, highlighting Washington’s renewed focus on Latin America. The move follows the US-backed transition that removed Nicolás Maduro from power earlier this year and signals a desire to draw South America more firmly back into its strategic and economic orbit. In our view, South American countries that deepen ties with the US could benefit from preferential trade access and increased investment flows, making them potentially attractive destinations for long‑term capital.

AI Showdwon: The dispute between Anthropic and the Pentagon has intensified after the US government formally categorized the AI firm’s technology as a supply-chain risk. The designation could restrict Anthropic from future defense collaborations and threatens its existing $200 million Pentagon contract. The conflict stems from disagreements over the company’s willingness to support certain government applications that it believes conflict with its internal ethical guidelines. This standoff could set a precedent for future public-private partnerships.

View PDF

Daily Comment (March 5, 2026)

by Patrick Fearon-Hernandez, CFA, and Thomas Wash

[Posted: 9:30 AM ET] | PDF

Our Comment opens with our take on China’s decision to revise its growth target. We then discuss the US economy in light of the latest ISM survey and ADP report. Next, we provide an update on Iran, examine another key breakthrough for crypto, and assess US shale’s ability to meet incremental demand following the Middle East conflict. We close with a summary of key US economic data and notable moves across global markets.

China Rethinks Target: The world’s second-largest economy has lowered its GDP target for the first time since 2023. On Wednesday, Beijing announced it would cut its growth target to a range of 4.5% to 5.0%, down from the previous target of 5.0%. The downgrade is being viewed as a signal that the government is willing to tolerate slower expansion as it pivots its growth model to address current challenges, including global pushback against its export-led strategy and a struggling real estate sector.

  • Beijing’s move to set a lower growth target range is widely seen as giving policymakers more room to tackle structural problems such as industrial overcapacity and weak domestic demand — issues that have also drawn criticism from key trading partners. At the same time, China’s state-led growth model has come under intensifying scrutiny, with the IMF recently urging Beijing to scale back sizable industrial subsidies and shift toward a more consumption-led model.
  • A transition in China’s growth model would be desirable, but it is unclear if the government is prepared to make the pivot. Consumers are seeing their net worth erode as the real estate sector continues to struggle, depleting household savings. Meanwhile, rather than stepping in with stimulus to restore confidence, Beijing has chosen to trim subsidies for consumer goods, raising questions about its commitment to supporting households through the transition.
  • That said, the shift represents an opportunity for China to negotiate a trade pact with the US as Presidents Xi Jinping and Donald Trump prepare to meet in a few weeks. The White House has signaled that any new agreement will require China to reform its export model and improve access for US business interests. Consequently, a lower growth target may signal China’s willingness to alter its economic model in exchange for reduced tariffs.
  • While the market ramifications of China reducing its growth target may not be immediate, we believe the move is a net positive if it paves the way for more productive trade talks. A potential agreement would benefit both equity markets but would be particularly impactful for US tech companies. In particular, a deal that loosens restrictions on Chinese rare earth minerals, critical components for emerging technologies, would provide a significant boost to the sector.

Economic Momentum: There are growing signs that the economy is gaining momentum as firms become more confident about future planning. The latest ISM Purchasing Managers’ Index showed business activity accelerating at its fastest pace since 2022, rising from 53.8 to 56.1 in February. Meanwhile, new data from ADP revealed that private employers added 63,000 jobs last month, well above the downwardly revised 11,000 in January, marking the strongest gain since July and suggesting companies are increasingly optimistic about future demand.

  • The latest ISM services report points to a clear pickup in demand. Key components such as inventories, backlogs, and new export orders are all in expansion territory, indicating a broad-based surge in activity. At the same time, the prices‑paid index has fallen below its 12‑month average, signaling that cost pressures, while still elevated, are starting to ease.
  • Meanwhile, private payroll data show that healthcare remains the primary driver of job growth, adding 58,000 positions in February. Construction also contributed significantly, with a gain of 19,000 jobs, while the information sector added another 11,000. In contrast, employment across most other sectors either declined slightly or remained largely unchanged from the previous month.
  • Despite ongoing economic improvement, business sentiment is being tempered by significant concerns over tariffs and the disruptive potential of AI. The latest ISM report underscores this shift, with anecdotal commentary revealing an intensified focus on cost pressures. On the labor front, the absence of robust job gains points to a prevailing “low hire, low fire” mentality. Crucially, this corporate caution regarding workforce expansion appears to be directly amplified by the rapid iteration and integration of AI technologies.
  • Overall, the economy continues to demonstrate resilience and is likely to remain on solid footing barring a major external shock. However, uncertainty surrounding tariffs and AI disruption warrants a cautious stance. We recommend managing risk by maintaining a balanced portfolio that includes diversifying beyond technology into other overlooked large cap sectors poised for growth, while also adding international exposure to hedge against domestic volatility.

Iran Update: The conflict has now entered its sixth day, and there are still no clear signs of an off-ramp. Iranian officials on Wednesday rejected reports of backchannel talks with the United States and warned that their war efforts will intensify. The White House, however, continues to express confidence that it has degraded Iran’s capacity to strike and is moving closer to bringing the conflict to an end. We continue to presume this turmoil will affect commodity markets, with higher oil prices and aluminum prices now also moving up. 

Crypto Access: In a landmark move for digital assets, the Federal Reserve has granted its first master account to a cryptocurrency firm. Kraken Financial secured a limited-purpose master account, providing direct access to the Fedwire Funds Service. This integration allows for significantly faster transfers and serves as a pivotal signal that cryptocurrency is maturing into a mainstream fixture of the global financial system.

US Shale Constraints: US shale drillers are signaling they may struggle to meet additional supply needs in the wake of the recent Middle East turmoil. Their main concern is that the high cost of new projects could undermine competitiveness at a time when the industry is focused on repaying shareholders. New developments are also expected to take time before coming online, limiting the near-term response. Taken together, constrained US supply suggests a prolonged conflict in the Middle East could keep oil prices elevated.

View PDF

Daily Comment (March 4, 2026)

by Patrick Fearon-Hernandez, CFA, and Thomas Wash

[Posted: 9:30 AM ET] | PDF

Our Comment opens with our assessment of the latest developments in Iran. We then examine how the conflict is reshaping the US relationship with its transatlantic allies. Next, we look at the Texas primary elections, review a new report on Germany’s infrastructure woes, and highlight emerging signs of renewed US engagement in South America. We also include a summary of key US economic data and notable moves in global markets.

Iran Conflict Broadens: Iran’s actions have disrupted trade throughout the Middle East and damaged several key oil storage facilities. Both Saudi Arabia and Iraq are reportedly running short on storage capacity in the aftermath of the attacks. Meanwhile, China has faced difficulties securing the energy supplies it depends on from the Strait of Hormuz. These developments drove a sharp spike in energy prices, which were later eased following the US announcement of plans to escort tankers through the region’s troubled waters.

  • There are growing signs that the US is making meaningful progress in its campaign against Iran, sparking debate over what comes next. US officials say ongoing strikes are steadily degrading Iran’s ability to threaten American interests and regional partners. At the same time, President Trump has cautioned against leaving Iran with a leader who is “no better” than the previous ruler. As a result, the administration has left open the option of deploying US ground forces, even as it insists such a move may not be necessary.
  • That said, the conflict has shown signs of intensifying. Iran appears to be broadening the conflict across the Middle East to provoke its neighbors into intervening. The campaign escalated sharply this week with major strikes on Monday against the US Embassy compound in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia, and on Tuesday near the US Consulate in Dubai. The UAE has been a primary target, facing nearly as many drone and missile attacks as Israel.
  • As of this morning, there are tentative signs that Iran may be seeking an off‑ramp from the conflict. Reporting indicates that Iranian intelligence officials have made indirect contact with US counterparts to probe possible terms for ending the war. This comes amid mounting signals that Mojtaba Khamenei, the son of the late Supreme Leader Ali Khamenei, has emerged as the regime’s favored choice to succeed his father, even if that succession has yet to be fully formalized in public.
  • While we are cautiously optimistic that the conflict could wind down in the coming days, there are still no definitive signs that an end is imminent. We continue to see maintaining commodity exposure as a prudent stance for now, with prices, especially in energy, likely to remain supported by ongoing disruption and uncertainty. That said, if tensions begin to ease in a more durable way, a rotation away from commodities could already be in its early stages.

Allies Disunited: The US-Israel joint operation has triggered notable pushback as several allied governments question the speed and scale of the escalation. On Thursday, Spain and the UK were sharply criticized by the White House after both initially refused to let the US use military bases on their territory to conduct strikes on Iran. In response, President Trump has threatened to cut off trade with Spain and publicly disparaged UK Prime Minister Keir Starmer’s leadership, saying he is “no Churchill.” The friction is another sign of the fraying transatlantic relationship.

  • Around the world, the response has been mixed, with many US allies stressing that Iran’s nuclear ambitions and regional aggression must be constrained even as they voice concern about the scale and legality of the US‑Israeli strikes. This tension was captured by Canadian Prime Minister Mark Carney, who backed efforts to prevent Iran from obtaining a nuclear weapon “with regret,” called the conflict “another example of the failure of the international order,” and urged rapid de‑escalation in the region.
  • Disagreements over the Iran strikes are emerging just as the US and its allies rework their broader security relationship. Washington is pressing partners to shoulder more of their own defense burdens, while the rest of the West steps up support for Ukraine and adjusts to a less predictable role from the US. This shift has pushed other Western countries to accelerate defense spending and raise their international profiles, from military outlays to crisis diplomacy in Ukraine and the Middle East.
  • While we do not think the US will completely abandon its Western allies, we do expect them to gradually diversify their exposure to the US. This is likely to involve strengthening their own defense capabilities, deepening trade ties with other partners, and reshaping their financial markets to better compete with the US for investment flows. Nevertheless, this would be a drawn‑out adjustment rather than a rapid, wholesale shift.
  • This gradual diversification is mirrored by a broad de‑risking across global markets, where the prolonged conflict appears to have shifted investor sentiment. Gold and silver have declined even as the dollar has strengthened, underscoring its continued status as the cornerstone of the financial system. While the dollar has since given back some of its gains as of this writing, we will be watching closely to see whether this marks the start of a more durable trend.

Texas Primary: The Texas primary saw James Talarico defeat his Democratic rival, Jasmine Crockett, in a closely watched US Senate contest. On the Republican side, Senator John Cornyn and Attorney General Ken Paxton both advanced to a runoff for their party’s nomination. The Senate race has drawn international attention because it offers Democrats a rare chance to flip a seat in a state that has been reliably Republican for decades, with potential implications for the chamber’s balance of power.

German Infrastructure: Germany has pledged to improve its military readiness, but recent reports suggest it still has a long way to go. While its armed forces now benefit from better equipment and facilities after Berlin moved to strengthen security in the wake of Russia’s invasion of Ukraine, chronic underinvestment means basic infrastructure remains a major constraint. We continue to view higher defense outlays as a positive catalyst for German equities, particularly within the country’s defense sector.

US Ecuador: The US is continuing to deepen its ties across Latin America, in what increasingly resembles a modern Monroe Doctrine-style approach to the region. On Tuesday, the US and Ecuador launched a joint military operation targeting drug trafficking, underscoring Washington’s growing security footprint. We see this kind of cooperation as a potential precursor to closer economic links as well, suggesting that South American countries with strong relationships with the White House could become attractive destinations for investment.

View PDF

Daily Comment (March 3, 2026)

by Patrick Fearon-Hernandez, CFA, and Thomas Wash

[Posted: 9:30 AM ET] | PDF

Our Comment today opens with an update on the war in the Middle East. We next review several other international and US developments with the potential to affect the financial markets today, including a move by France to extend its nuclear weapons umbrella across Europe and reports that Kevin Warsh, the nominee to be the next chair of the Federal Reserve, does not intend to cut the central bank’s balance sheet as sharply as some have feared.

United States-Israel-Iran: The war against Iran not only continues today but shows signs of widening into a broader regional conflict that could increasingly impair the production and shipment of energy supplies. Iran continues to lash out at countries all over the Middle East, including a drone attack on the US Embassy in Saudi Arabia and missile attacks on key airports. We have also seen reports of rioting in Bahrain, raising the specter that Iran has pre-positioned civil unrest squads across the region.

  • In support of Iran, Hezbollah militants in Lebanon launched attacks on Israel, prompting the Israeli military to stage attacks across that country and send troops over the border.
  • Meanwhile, the US and its allies are becoming increasingly concerned that Iran’s unexpectedly large inventory of available missiles and drones could lead them to deplete their inventories of air-defense missiles.
  • President Trump has tried to dismiss those concerns explicitly, saying the US has a “virtually unlimited supply” of most weapons, while acknowledging that the country is “not where we want to be” on the highest-end weapons. Nevertheless, the threat of a shortage illustrates how the US and its allies have failed to field Ukraine-style anti-drone units armed with less expensive but still relatively effective defenses against drones.
  • In any case, the rapid depletion of US and allied air-defense assets likely increases the risk that other adversaries will take advantage of the situation. For example, it could tempt China to make a grab for Taiwan, while Russia could conceivably be tempted to stage attacks in Eastern Europe.
  • As the conflict continues to expand, investors are becoming more concerned about the global economic impact. Energy prices continue to rise, with Brent crude oil today up another 7.5% to $83.53 per barrel. Natural gas prices are also surging. In contrast, gold and silver prices have pulled back a bit, perhaps reflecting both profit taking and concerns about an economic slowdown sparked by high energy prices. Indeed, stock index futures and copper prices are also down sharply so far this morning.

US Politics: President Trump has offered a range of justifications for launching the war against Iran now, angering the Republican Party’s influential “America First” wing, but the concerns were amplified yesterday by Secretary of State Rubio’s assertion that the US had to act because Israel was going to attack. The statement was interpreted by some as subordinating US interests to those of Israel. The growing controversy among Republicans could increase the odds of the Democrats taking control of the House in the November midterm elections.

Eurozone: In an initial estimate, the February consumer price index was up 1.9% from the same month one year earlier, above expectations and up from 1.7% in the year to January. Excluding the volatile food and energy components, February core CPI was up 2.4% on the year, up from 2.2% in the year to January. The accelerating price hikes were driven in part by an uptick in energy prices as investors looked to the possibility of war against Iran. Now that the war has begun, price inflation in Europe is expected to accelerate further.

France: President Macron yesterday said France is working on a plan under which it will boost its arsenal of nuclear weapons and forward-deploy them among eight other European nations including the UK, Belgium, the Netherlands, Sweden, Denmark, Germany, Poland, and Greece. The goal of the program would be to offer Europe a comprehensive nuclear deterrence with increased survivability in time of war. The announcement is consistent with our oft-stated belief that current geopolitical changes could well spark a new, global nuclear arms race.

  • Importantly, if France becomes the linchpin for Europe’s nuclear deterrence, it would greatly increase the country’s influence over the rest of the Continent. At some point, that would likely become intolerable to Germany, given its centuries-old rivalry with France. Germany and other European countries, such as Poland, might then seek to develop their own independent nuclear forces.
  • While the future prospects for uranium prices are rosy because of Chinese and Indian plans for more nuclear electricity in the coming years, we have long maintained that the added demand for nuclear weapons around the world will also tend to push up prices for the metal.

US Monetary Policy: According to the Financial Times, acquaintances of Kevin Warsh say the nominee to be the next Fed chair would reduce the central bank’s balance sheet over time, avoiding sudden moves that could destabilize the financial markets. The sources also said Warsh would only seek to shrink the balance sheet after extensive talks on its potential effects with banks and the broader public. If accurate, the report suggests that Warsh got the nomination by promising President Trump that he won’t tighten monetary policy too quickly.

US Private Credit Industry: The Financial Times reports that Blackstone’s $82 billion private credit fund, Bcred, suffered net outflows of $1.7 billion in the first quarter, equal to 7.9% of its assets. Coming shortly after Blue Owl halted redemptions from its private fund focused on the same asset class, the news illustrates how investors have become increasingly worried about “cockroaches” in exotic private debt and asset-backed lending markets. That will likely help tighten financial conditions, increasing the risk of an economic or financial market downturn.

View PDF

Daily Comment (March 2, 2026)

by Patrick Fearon-Hernandez, CFA, and Thomas Wash

[Posted: 9:30 AM ET] | PDF

Our Comment today opens with some thoughts on the new war against Iran that the US and Israel launched on Saturday. We next review several other international and US developments that could affect the financial markets today, including more signs of weak consumer demand in China and a continued effort by Canada and India to reduce their trade dependency on the US.

United States-Israel-Iran: Obviously, the weekend launch of a joint US-Israeli military attack on Iran is the key news that will drive the markets today. The news has been widely reported, so we’ll just focus on the key highlights for investors. Importantly, the attacks targeted both Iran’s political leadership and its military, resulting in the death of supreme leader Ayatollah Khamenei on Saturday as well as dozens of other high officials. Nevertheless, the Iranian military has launched retaliatory strikes across the region, and military operations continue.

  • Reports suggest that Khamenei dispersed political and military authority before the fighting started, ensuring in particular that the Iranian military had standing orders to keep fighting even if he were killed. Indeed, some reports suggest the Iranian Revolutionary Guards Corps is now fighting nearly independently. That could make it difficult to stop the fighting even if some political leaders or groups in Iran decide they want peace.
  • More broadly, the chaos has the potential to spark secession efforts by various groups within Iran, similar efforts by groups in other regional countries, and/or intervention by other regional powers. In other words, the situation continues to pose the risk of a wider regional war.
  • The main goals of the US appear to be further degrading Iran’s military capability (especially its nuclear and missile programs) and prompting a popular uprising that would lead to a new regime or at least a serious alteration of the current one. However, if that doesn’t occur within the next several weeks, we suspect President Trump would declare victory and stop the operation. We believe Trump is especially cognizant that US voters have little stomach for yet another long war aimed at regime change in the Middle East.
  • All the same, military operations are notoriously difficult to control. At the moment, much risk remains, and investors are rightly on edge about further conflict and risks related to the region’s energy supplies.
  • Reports this morning say Iran has now staged a drone attack on one of Saudi Arabia’s most important oil facilities at Ras Tanura and is expanding its attacks on shipping through the Strait of Hormuz. That will raise the risk of Saudi Arabia joining the attacks on Iran and potentially spur Iran to further escalate its attacks on Saudi Arabia.
  • Separately, other reports say Iranian attacks have forced Qatar to shut down its liquefied natural gas production, causing global prices to soar and risking bringing Qatar into the conflict.
  • As a result, global oil prices are surging this morning, with Brent up about 8.6% to $79.04 per barrel. Natural gas prices have also surged. Gold prices are up 3.1% to $5,409.40 per ounce, but Treasury obligations have weakened, probably on concerns about rising consumer price inflation. Benchmark 10-year Treasury yields as of this writing are up modestly to 4.006%. Finally, US and European defense stocks are getting a strong bid.

China: BYD, which is now the world’s largest electric vehicle maker, said its February sales were down a whopping 41% year-over-year as a 50% rise in export sales was more than offset by a 65% plunge in domestic sales. The figures show how Chinese firms’ efforts to make up for China’s weak domestic demand by going abroad won’t necessarily work. The figures therefore illustrate a key vulnerability for Chinese stocks that are heavily focused on sales to domestic consumers.

South Korea: According to new data from the Trade Ministry, exports in February were up a strong 29% year-over-year, beating expectations and almost matching the 34% rise in January. The data show that much of the strength came from semiconductors, reflecting South Korea’s strength in producing memory chips. This serves as a reminder that foreign economies and stocks are also benefiting from the surge in US data-center construction for artificial intelligence.

Canada-India: During Canadian Prime Minister Carney’s visit to New Delhi today, he and Indian Prime Minister Modi agreed to accelerate their talks on a free-trade deal, seeking to sign a pact by the end of the year. The agreement illustrates how both countries are trying to broaden their trade relationships to reduce their dependence on the US. Over time, the plethora of new non-US trade deals could potentially rejigger world trade flows and affect global stocks, although it’s probably too early to identify the winners and losers at this point.

Argentina: In President Milei’s biggest legislative victory so far, the Senate on Friday passed a major deregulation of the labor market that will make it easier for firms to lay off employees. The reform will also roll back rigid restraints on hiring and working hours. By giving companies greater flexibility, the reform could improve economic efficiency and ease business conditions. That could also help boost foreign investment in the country. Overall, the reform is likely to be positive for the Argentine economy and stock values.

US Artificial Intelligence (AI) Industry: As threatened, the White House late Friday ordered all federal agencies to halt use of Anthropic’s Claude AI model over the company’s insistence on specific prohibitions against the Pentagon using the model for mass surveillance of US citizens or the autonomous killing of foreign adversaries. The Pentagon also designated Anthropic a “Supply-Chain Risk to National Security,” preventing any company doing business with the US military from also having a commercial relationship with Anthropic.

  • The big winner from the confrontation is likely to be OpenAI, which closed on a new funding round worth $110 billion on Friday and then later announced that it had reached a deal in which the Pentagon would use its AI models subject to red lines similar to those that Anthropic had demanded.
  • Nevertheless, the incident is another example of how the US government has now become much more aggressive about intervening in the economy and pressuring private firms to adopt or abandon specific policies.

Global Asset-Backed Securities Market: Investors in the asset-backed securities market have become alarmed by the collapse of British mortgage lender Managed Financial Solutions last week after it was discovered that the firm double-pledged collateral on some of its bonds. The scandal echoed recent concerns about similar shenanigans in the US asset-backed markets. These incidents are likely to make asset-backed investors increasingly skittish, which would likely raise the risk of a credit crunch and financial disruptions.

View PDF