Weekly Geopolitical Report – Welcome to the World, the Country of Catalonia? (October 6, 2014)

by Kaisa Stucke & Bill O’Grady

On November 9, the Catalonia region of Spain is due to hold a referendum for independence.  The referendum had previously been approved by the regional government; however, it was ruled unconstitutional by the Spanish Supreme Court.  Currently, it is unclear whether the November 9 referendum would result in a different outcome.

This week, we will look at the separatist movement in Catalonia.  We will start by giving a brief overview of the region’s history and politics, then look at the roots of the independence movement.  We will explore the probability of independence, the potential future relationship between the region and the central government, and the role of the EU and the Eurozone.  As always, we will conclude with market ramifications.

View the full report

Weekly Geopolitical Report – Ebola (September 29, 2014)

by Kaisa Stucke & Bill O’Grady

Last week marked six months since the Ebola outbreak was identified in the African country of Guinea.  The current Ebola epidemic is the largest, most severe and most complex outbreak of the disease in the history of the virus.  More cases have been diagnosed and more people have died than in all the prior outbreaks combined.  All 24 of the previous outbreaks have occurred in Central Africa.  The virus was able to spread undetected for months as this is the first episode of the virus to take place in West Africa.  Complicating the initial diagnosis was the fact that the symptoms of Ebola are identical to many other diseases in the region.

Ebola is a viral hemorrhaging fever that attacks the blood vessels, causing internal bleeding and leading to multiple organ failure.  Fast-spreading and fatal in more than half the cases, the virus can be easily spread through direct contact with an infected person’s bodily fluids or contact with contaminated items.  The symptoms start after an incubation period of two to 21 days, and it is believed that a person is only contagious after symptoms appear.

Since the disease is so fast-spreading and healthcare facilities so strained, it is hard to keep an accurate running count but as of the time of this writing the World Health Organization (WHO) estimates the case count is currently at 6,574 and the death count is 3,091.  Global observers believe that this number is underestimated.  The Centers for Disease Control (CDC) estimated last week that the total number of cases could reach between 550,000 and 1.4 million by January 2015.  Without a significant improvement in fighting the disease, the number of cases could double every 20 days.  We note that this estimate does not account for the recently announced funding support from the U.S. to combat the disease.

This week, we will explore the Ebola outbreak, looking at the origin of the disease, how it has spread and how it has developed into a serious epidemic.  Although it is hard to find comparable epidemics due to the complexities of the disease, we will look at a couple of other disease outbreaks in order to gain a better understanding of the scale of the current Ebola epidemic.  As always, we will finish with geopolitical and market ramifications.

View the full report

Asset Allocation Weekly (February 28, 2014)

by Asset Allocation Committee

At the founding of our asset allocation process in the second quarter of 2000, the prevailing method of asset allocation was strategic, which is usually defined as an allocation based on a time horizon of at least 7-10 years.  However, in practice, strategic programs assumed that adjustments to the model were usually unnecessary, and only required when truly secular changes occurred in markets, society, government or geopolitics.  For the period of the 1980s through the 1990s, when equities were in a secular bull market, unchanging models generally performed well, although it could be argued that the risk-adjusted returns they provided were rather lackluster.

In the late 1990s, when Mark Keller, the current CIO and CEO of Confluence Investment Management, was appointed to head the Investment Strategy Committee at A.G. Edwards, there was a concern that static models were exposing investors to excessive risk.  For example, by December 1999, the Shiller Cyclically Adjusted P/E had reached 44.2x earnings, an all-time high.  Financial advisors at the firm wanted Mark to devise a program that would take market and economic conditions into account in making asset allocation decisions.

At the same time, there was hesitancy among the members of the committee to create a purely tactical allocation program.  These programs are usually rules-based by design, using past trends to establish positions.  The promise of tactical systems is that they can “capture the upside or avoid the downside.”  And, if the past perfectly matches the future, they will perform as advertised.  However, the Investment Strategy Committee was concerned that unusual events that had not occurred over the period for which the tactical program was created would likely not be incorporated into the “model” and thus lead to adverse results.

And so, the Investment Strategy Committee created a hybrid between these two polar opposites, a Cyclical Asset Allocation Program.  The process incorporated a variety of viewpoints, including economic, political, geopolitical, and financial factors that evaluated risk, yield and total return of 10 (now 12) different asset classes on a rolling three-year time horizon.  Each member of the committee submitted forecasts for these asset classes and presented these forecasts to the entire committee in a series of meetings.  After all the forecasts were submitted, the committee would establish a consensus that, in the end, best incorporated the committee’s expectations for the markets over the next 12 quarters.  The asset allocation process used today here at Confluence is unchanged from that original process.

This process was designed to address the weaknesses of both the strategic and tactical allocation models.  Strategic models usually are first established via a fundamental process—the manager looks at the world and designs a program that will work over the long term, assuming that underlying trends in markets and the economy will roughly remain the same.  Tactical models, on the other hand, tend to be “twitchy,” moving positions around fairly often to try to capture short-term gains.  Tactical models have tended to evolve into algorithms that have been heavily back-tested; although the back-tests offer some comfort, as we noted above, they will only work as expected if the future resembles the past rather closely.

Our method, instead, looks at the world through a variety of viewpoints; each member of the committee has a unique background and methodology in creating their forecasts.  The consensus drawn is not a mere average of forecasts; instead, it works to establish a viewpoint that reflects the basic expectations of how the next three years will unfold.  It does not purport to be perfect but the program does create a process where an ever changing world can be evaluated with a consistent approach and rebalanced at least every three months.  We believe our cyclical asset allocation program offers a unique method of addressing uncertainty that is flexible enough to make changes, but not so rules-based as to miss major changes in the world order.

View the PDF

Weekly Geopolitical Report – The TTIP and the TPP (January 27, 2014)

by Bill O’Grady

The Transatlantic Trade and Investment Partnership (TTIP) is a trade and investment treaty being negotiated between the European Union (EU) and the U.S.  The Trans-Pacific Partnership (TPP) is a similar pact being negotiated between the U.S. and various Pacific Rim nations in both the eastern and western hemisphere.  If enacted, both these trade agreements will have significant geopolitical consequences.

In this report, we will begin by discussing the nations involved.  We will examine overall details of the proposals, focusing on how they are different from traditional trade agreements.  From there, an analysis of the controversy surrounding these proposals will be presented.  A look at the geopolitical aims of each agreement will follow and the likelihood that these treaties will be enacted.  As always, we will conclude with potential market ramifications.

View the full report

Weekly Geopolitical Report – Best Consumed Below Zero? (December 9, 2013)

by Kaisa Stucke & Bill O’Grady

When ECB President Mario Draghi was asked at a recent press conference if the central bank would consider a negative deposit rate, Draghi answered that the institution has approached the question “with an open mind.”  This topic is fascinating in terms of alternative options in monetary policy as well as the possible geopolitical ramifications if a major currency country undertakes a below-zero rate program.  Looking back at recent history, there are two examples of European countries that have instituted negative term deposit rates since the 2008 crisis.  Denmark first utilized a negative deposit rate of -0.2% in July 2012 and then adjusted it in January 2013 to slightly less negative, but it has remained at -0.1% since.  Sweden employed a negative term rate between July 2009 and September 2010.  In both cases, the rate cut was a reaction to the appreciating currency due to large capital flows out of the Eurozone and into the perceived safety of non-Eurozone European Union countries.

We will turn our attention to Denmark to study its decision to undertake the below-zero rate, the specifics of the situation that prompted it and the effects of the negative rate on financial conditions and the broader economy.  We will then briefly look at the possibility of a below-zero rate policy for the ECB and, most importantly, the geopolitical ramifications of the decision by the world’s second largest currency block to ease into unknown consequences of negative rates to stimulate the economy.

View the full report

Weekly Geopolitical Report – Elections in Chile (November 25, 2013)

by Bill O’Grady

On November 17th, Chileans went to the polls to vote on a new president and parliament.  Polls correctly forecasted that Michelle Bachelet, who was president from 2006-10, would win a plurality.  She won a whopping 47% of the vote, beating seven other candidates handily.  The second place finisher, Evelyn Matthei, won 25% of the vote.  These two women, who are friends from childhood, will face each other in a runoff election on December 15th.

In this report, we offer short biographies of the two candidates, focusing mostly on Bachelet.  From there, we will provide a short history of Chile, primarily to highlight the tensions between the forces of liberalization and reaction.  An examination of the Allende-Pinochet period will detail the factors that have affected Chile’s political structure over the past five decades.  Recent student protests frame a significant demographic change that is affecting Chilean politics and moving the country beyond the issues experienced in the 1970s.  As always, we will conclude with market ramifications.

View the full report

Weekly Geopolitical Report – France and the Iranian Negotiations (November 18, 2013)

by Bill O’Grady

Earlier this month, negotiations between Iran and the P5+1 (U.S., U.K., France, China and Russia, the five permanent members of the U.N. Security Council, plus Germany) failed to reach an agreement despite great hopes that one was near.  In fact, on expectations that a proposed nuclear deal was in the offing, U.S. Secretary of State Kerry cut short his talks with Israel and the Palestinians to join the discussions.  However, near the end of the talks, France raised objections to the proposed agreement and its concerns could not be resolved.  And so, the parties agreed to meet later this month but with lower level officials manning the discussions.

U.S. and French relations have seen many twists and turns since the end of WWII.  France refused to join NATO and opted for its own nuclear arsenal.  It tried to hew a line between the U.S. and the U.S.S.R. during the Cold War, upsetting both sides at times.  France was a reluctant ally during the Gulf War and was strongly opposed to America’s war to oust Saddam Hussein in 2003.  However, France strongly backed the effort to protect Libyans from the wrath of Muammar Gaddafi in 2011 and also pressed to use military force against the Assad regime for deploying chemical weapons.  France is one of the best examples of Lord Palmerston’s famous quote, “Nations have permanent interests but no permanent friends.”

In this report, we will examine the reasons behind French objections to a nuclear deal with Iran.  We will begin with an examination of France’s relations with the Middle East, focusing on its relations with Israel.  Using this history as a guide, we will analyze why the French scotched the potential agreement.  A short discussion will follow of the impact of France’s objection on the evolution of U.S. policy with Iran.  As always, we will conclude with market ramifications.

View the full report

Weekly Geopolitical Report – Let’s Party Like it’s 1978 (November 11, 2013)

by Bill O’Grady & Kaisa Stucke

A twice yearly meeting of the Chinese government officials, formally known as the third plenary session of the 18th Communist Party of China Central Committee, started on Saturday and will end tomorrow.

Officials have indicated that this plenary session could be a springboard for major reforms.  In fact, Chinese General Secretary Xi Jinping has indicated that this session could be as consequential as the plenary session in 1978 which introduced policies that set in motion the Chinese growth engine.  The 1978 meeting was a significant turning point for both the country and the Communist Party itself.

This week, we are going to take a closer look at the changes from the plenary session 35 years ago, the circumstances leading up to the session and how China changed following the meeting.  In understanding the changes associated with the 1978 meeting, we can better assess the statement that this week’s meeting could be just as significant.

View the full report

Weekly Geopolitical Report – The Saudi Tribulation (November 4, 2013)

by Bill O’Grady

On October 18th, Saudi King Abdullah’s government announced that his kingdom would reject an invitation by the U.N. Security Council to occupy a seat on the council.  This rejection is the first in the history of the United Nations and occurred after Saudi diplomats had worked diligently to garner the invitation.  The rejection came as a surprise to the U.N. and to the U.S.

According to reports, King Abdullah decided to reject the seat due to the Security Council’s “double standards.”  He argued that the inability to resolve the Palestinian issue, prevent the proliferation of WMD and stop the Syrian regime from killing its citizens as reasons for the refusal to accept the post.  However, these factors are generally thought to be excuses.  Instead, the Saudi regime, incensed at U.S. policy decisions, rejected the seat as a way to express the kingdom’s displeasure with the American government.  We note that Turkey and Egypt, also unhappy with recent decisions by the Obama administration, supported the kingdom’s decision.

In this report, we will discuss the basic history of U.S. and Saudi relations, focusing on the historical commonality of goals between the two nations.  We will detail how the aims of the two nations have diverged since the Cold War ended and use this to examine America’s evolving plans for the Middle East.  We will discuss how the evolution of U.S. policy is affecting Saudi Arabia and the pressures these changes are bringing to the kingdom.  As always, we will conclude with market ramifications.

View the full report